ISRO Starts Testing MEGA Semi Cryo Engine | SCE200

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 279

  • @cybertron42
    @cybertron42 Год назад +88

    At 1:17 the upgraded version of raptor is able to produce 2300kN of thrust as opposed to the older version with a thrust number of 1815 kN.
    Source: ruclips.net/video/ALiNmzoo1_E/видео.html

    • @IndoSB
      @IndoSB Год назад +9

      ISRO PSU banke bazaar se $¥€ kyo nhi uthata ? Iss field pe Space-X ko ek unfair advantage mil jaata h 😡

    • @cosmicfactz
      @cosmicfactz Год назад +1

      How to witness launch of isro Rockets anyone please help me with this

    • @tirthachakrabarti5912
      @tirthachakrabarti5912 Год назад

      @@cosmicfactz Near launch site or in video?

    • @dibakarsaha6807
      @dibakarsaha6807 Год назад +1

      @@IndoSB it's a govt organisation.....not a company

    • @IndoSB
      @IndoSB Год назад +1

      @@dibakarsaha6807 Galat, ISRO manufacturing v krta hai.

  • @bharathch5282
    @bharathch5282 Год назад +176

    RD-810 is a Ukrainian derivative of Russian engine RD-120. Russian RD-120 is developed in 1990 and China got this technology in 1990s from Russia. In 1995 USA got this engine and updated for there requirements. In 2006 government of India got blueprints of RD-810 engine from Ukraine. For people wondering yes it is 30 year old engine technology and it depends on ISRO to innovate it just like China and USA did. China got this technology in 1990s and created Yf engines in 2007 which power all LONG MARCH family rockets.

    • @yangshujian
      @yangshujian Год назад +17

      Not quite correct for the Chinese YF part. All Chinese liquid engines are named YF-XXX, including those hypergolic ones developed during 1970s, like YF-20, which is still powering the Long March 2/3/4 families today. The Chinese engine derived from RD-120 is called YF-100, which is being used on Long March 5/6/7/8, namely the "new generation Long March rockets" only.
      Today the majority of the Chinese launches are still completed by rockets powered by hypergolic engines, just like Vikas. Only about 15% of China's annual launches use the clean YF-100 engines. Yet they are all used to launch the heaviest payloads, like space station modules, cargo spacecrafts, or advanced communication satellites, all of which require high energy that the traditional engines can't handle.

    • @JohnSmith-vn8dm
      @JohnSmith-vn8dm Год назад +7

      The YF-115 is also closely derived from the RD-120. I didn't know the US had any updated RD-120 though, are you sure about that? I know they bought some RD-120s for the Atlas 3.

    • @uniquea4643
      @uniquea4643 Год назад +11

      From where you all getting this knowledge 😮😮 i feel jealous

    • @hera-nf8mz
      @hera-nf8mz Год назад +6

      you get excited by the headline and think , wah, and then you read a comment like yours and realise, this tech come to india quarter century late, then mood changes to desperation.
      still, hope comes form india making consistent progress.

    • @jarjarbinks3193
      @jarjarbinks3193 Год назад +4

      @@JohnSmith-vn8dm China's YF-100 is based on the Ukrainian RD-801 design, which is a derivative of the Soviet RD-120.
      India's SCE-200 is based on the Ukrainian RD-810 design, which is also a derivative of the Soviet RD-120.

  • @ashutoshkumar7452
    @ashutoshkumar7452 Год назад +80

    My brain starts to overflow with dopamine whenever I get a notification of your new vedio 🚀🚀🚀🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @rajoynunisa244
    @rajoynunisa244 Год назад +31

    Congratulations to the entire team for their efforts. And thanks for giving us brief and vivid explanation of SCE 200.

  • @gunasekaran7290
    @gunasekaran7290 Год назад +25

    Thank you for adding subtitles...it means a lot .

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +8

      Need to correct them will around lunch time

    • @hiren_bhatt
      @hiren_bhatt Год назад

      ​@@GareebScientist Yes. I noticed quite a few errors such as "leaks" instead of "leagues", and wrong spelling of "Mahendragiri". 😅

    • @dibakarsaha6807
      @dibakarsaha6807 Год назад

      ​@@hiren_bhatt kryojinik😂

  • @mratanusarkar
    @mratanusarkar Год назад +34

    What a time to be alive! 😍

    • @aps_indian
      @aps_indian Год назад +2

      Especially being GenZ in India ❤❤
      Very lucky

    • @supremeleader5516
      @supremeleader5516 14 часов назад

      Worst time man, 50 saal late ana chaiye tha, tab tak yeh shithole shi ho jata

    • @supremeleader5516
      @supremeleader5516 14 часов назад

      @aps_indian lmao genz not getting job! What lucky

  • @rakheekamble60
    @rakheekamble60 Год назад +16

    Love this guy! Never lets us down.

  • @appdev4861
    @appdev4861 Год назад +14

    As an engineer, cannt agree more that many times from-scratch projects are easier to productise than derived ones..

  • @audiotonic
    @audiotonic Год назад +2

    are you proactively working in the space industry .If not then man just flabbergasted by the level of knowledge you have about each and every topic Respect.

  • @sairampv1
    @sairampv1 Год назад +8

    last time i checked news about cryogenic engine development in India I was saddened due to the slow progress but after trying to do my engineering final year project i now understand building new things is so difficult even with a clear blueprint

    • @supremeleader5516
      @supremeleader5516 14 часов назад

      Bro you are college students and ISRO is full fledged govt company with crores of funding and top tier engineers, it should not be difficult for them

  • @AspirantKanishka
    @AspirantKanishka Год назад +12

    01:53 respect increased for ISRO as well as China

    • @-Blue-_
      @-Blue-_ Год назад +5

      Lol China

    • @tirthachakrabarti5912
      @tirthachakrabarti5912 Год назад +4

      @@-Blue-_ China is highly advanced. Currently only second to the USA.

    • @-Blue-_
      @-Blue-_ Год назад +2

      @@tirthachakrabarti5912 nope some European countries are advanced than China

    • @sidharthcs2110
      @sidharthcs2110 Год назад

      ​@@-Blue-_
      Ignorant, am i right?

    • @devbro2310
      @devbro2310 Год назад

      @@-Blue-_ learn to respect, I am gona copy several thing to start manufacturing in IND

  • @sjjerome8706
    @sjjerome8706 Год назад +2

    Man, that tubing is insane.....

  • @sandeepmore681
    @sandeepmore681 Год назад +1

    Are bhai kab iska kab se wait kar raha hun me 😍😍🤩😍😍

  • @laveena7358
    @laveena7358 Год назад +26

    Sir it's a request, please make a complete series of videos explaining everything related to Rocket technology from scratch. It would be helpful for us to understand the technical terms in a better way.

    • @mahir__2589
      @mahir__2589 Год назад +4

      You can view channels like everyday astronaut or bps space or scott manley for those kinda stuffs

  • @yellowNred
    @yellowNred Год назад +5

    Waiting for the day when ISRO starts competing and overtaking SpaceX. Dream big. Work hard and smart. 🇮🇳🙏👍

    • @sundarjoshi6568
      @sundarjoshi6568 6 месяцев назад

      ISRO can't overtake SpaceX bro never in a lifetime. They are way ahead.

  • @indranilchoudhury4723
    @indranilchoudhury4723 Год назад

    Jai Ho Ma Bharati
    ISRO World’s Envy Bharat’s Pride

  • @woman178
    @woman178 Год назад

    It's good news isro and for Indians home made asml machine talents of Indian s shining everywhere

  • @priyansutank
    @priyansutank Год назад +3

    Nambi sir has entered the chat!

  • @bundusingla1045
    @bundusingla1045 Год назад +4

    This is a big achievement. But ISRO has to speed up its complete development and integration trails with the rocket so that it may not left behind the race.

  • @r.a.wscientists
    @r.a.wscientists Год назад +10

    this year going to be fun 😁

    • @vadapallichaitu8799
      @vadapallichaitu8799 Год назад +2

      It will take 2 years for this engine to be ready . 2025 is the year you should look out for

    • @r.a.wscientists
      @r.a.wscientists Год назад +2

      @@vadapallichaitu8799 chandrayan 3 hai Aditya L1 ha uske liye excited

  • @ashwadhwani
    @ashwadhwani Год назад +3

    Pls set up ISRO challenge scholarship for engineering/science students where they get a chance to help from minor problems to roadblocks

  • @newworld2086
    @newworld2086 Год назад +10

    Great video and explanation. You mentioned about metallurgy. I know this engine and Kaveri are totally different but can metallurgy knowledge be transferred to Kaveri team or it is completely different? 😬

    • @arunramachandran5012
      @arunramachandran5012 Год назад +3

      The correct term is material science and metallurgy is one part of it. Yes, one of the biggest challenges in engineering today IS material science but nobody is giving it the due focus and value. Even Elon Musk routinely says that for SpaceX and Tesla, the biggest challenge is material science and his advice to young engineers is to focus on that field. Yes, some of the material science expertise can absolutely be transferred from the work done on Kaveri. But obviously, some of the specs and engineering requirements are also going to be brand new.

    • @newworld2086
      @newworld2086 Год назад +2

      @@arunramachandran5012 Thank you for detailed information.

    • @himanshusingh5214
      @himanshusingh5214 Год назад +1

      Material science is a well funded (by market and governemnts) multi trillion dollar Industry. It has been in existence since at least 1 lakh years. It has been a separate field of study since the first half of 20th century. It touches every aspect of your life and it is everywhere, even inside your pussy. Every year thousands of new materials get developed for millions of applications. People are always in the search of the new miracle material with desirable properties.
      Some examples of big breakthroughs in material science are plant fiber based fabric, processed leather, refined copper and silver, Ceramics, Steel, Aluminium (in 20th century), Kevelar, Plastic, Graphene, rubber, bitumen, refined silicon, body friendly materials, high melting point alloys, ultralight alloys, ultralight tiles, silicon nitride, high temperature superconductors.

    • @Dennis56781000
      @Dennis56781000 Год назад +6

      @@newworld2086 Someone once commented that Jet engines are far more sophisticated than Rocket engines. This is due to the fact that Jet engines have moving parts and require a very high degree of engineering and manufacturing expertise. That's why you'll see Rocket engine tech proliferating while Jet engine tech is a closely guarded secret that no one shares.
      Kaveri would require 5-10 billion dollars and a decade to function tbh. You will be amazed to know we spent only 2000 crore over a span of 30 years on Kaveri which is peanuts and it's a miracle that folks at GTRE still churned out a working engine.

  • @gamingwithkiran9610
    @gamingwithkiran9610 Год назад +3

    Please make a video on shukrayaan
    Maine suna delay kar diya gaya hai 2031 tak

  • @indiboy7
    @indiboy7 Год назад +5

    Wow! We will soon have our own cryo engine!

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +16

      We have once since decades,
      Ce 7. 5, ce20
      Semi cryo? Yes 1st time kind off. They have tested smaller scale ones. Nambi narayan book ha mention I guess

    • @indiboy7
      @indiboy7 Год назад

      @@GareebScientist ok. I am learning about rockets from your videos sir.

    • @tirthachakrabarti5912
      @tirthachakrabarti5912 Год назад +1

      @@indiboy7 You can say we are going to have lower/core stage (semi)cryogenic engine for the first time.

  • @vivekmanjeshwar2039
    @vivekmanjeshwar2039 Год назад

    Thanks for the Beutiful explanation admin, you have covered all the aspects, Congratulations to our team Isro, Jai Hind 🙏

  • @tirthachakrabarti5912
    @tirthachakrabarti5912 Год назад +2

    Happy to see you have used that Moon mission scheme in a video. I have a HD picture of SC120 stage. Tell me if you need that.

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +2

      Thanks Tirtha bhai for hunting it down. Arre mila. Mein ye rush mein kiya since later week would be difficult to make time. Rush shows in the broken flow

    • @tirthachakrabarti5912
      @tirthachakrabarti5912 Год назад

      @@GareebScientist oh..okay.

  • @gravy4708
    @gravy4708 Год назад +4

    Bhai ISRO ke future missions pe ek ek dedicated video bana do. Jaise Gaganyan, Chandryaan 3, Sun probe aur agar kuch aur honge to

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +1

      No waise videos mein point nahi lagta. Google karo

    • @r.a.wscientists
      @r.a.wscientists Год назад +1

      @@GareebScientist u believe in quality>quantity 🔥

  • @omdevs
    @omdevs Год назад +2

    Damn! Cool! Thanks

  • @gtvishal2521
    @gtvishal2521 Год назад

    Bade dino baat video ka notification aya tumhara

  • @vigneshb5347
    @vigneshb5347 5 месяцев назад

    Thanks for an Excellent info Bro 🙏

    • @vigneshb5347
      @vigneshb5347 5 месяцев назад

      About these engines, if I remember it right, the engines made for Saturn series in US can no longer be replicated as the engineers/ scientists who designed and made them are long gone and the Art they mastered too is gone.

  • @JBande
    @JBande 6 месяцев назад +1

    Please make a video on how spacex got so fast and so much ahead of the rest of the pack, did they develop the engines from scratch and so on...

    • @ManmohanSingh-ep1sc
      @ManmohanSingh-ep1sc 5 месяцев назад

      I think they got full technology from NASA when SpaceX started.

  • @SpaceTechExplorationprogram123
    @SpaceTechExplorationprogram123 Год назад +2

    SCE200
    Something you promised 3 years ago
    BTW Great video 🎉

  • @harshaprasad8666
    @harshaprasad8666 Год назад

    I don't even know what will I do with the information i get from this channel

  • @dhoomketu731
    @dhoomketu731 Год назад +1

    DRDO and ISRO should seriously start working together for developing Scramjets and Ramjets. We cannot afford to miss on these technologies.

    • @aniruddhamulay2932
      @aniruddhamulay2932 Год назад +1

      I guess you should read about DRDO's SFDR and HSTDV and ISRO's RLV-TD.

    • @dhoomketu731
      @dhoomketu731 Год назад

      @@aniruddhamulay2932 I have read about it. The thing is that we should fund such projects generously. Our scientists accomplish wonders on a shoe string budget. Give them international level funding and watch them soar above everyone else. Jai Hind!

  • @shivamwarwadkar4107
    @shivamwarwadkar4107 Год назад

    Dhanyawad bhau

  • @AyushKumar-km7ly
    @AyushKumar-km7ly Год назад

    most important development

  • @tayenderkumar3366
    @tayenderkumar3366 Год назад +2

    IMO goal thoda jyada bada rkh liya jaise Kaveri turbojet engine ka rkh liya. SpaceX ko bahot mushkil hui raptor ka temperature maintain krne me, Wish Isro all the very best.

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +3

      Spacex issue is more because of the complex full flow stage combustion cycle. Sce 200 os staged combustion similar to gslv mk2s ce7. 5

  • @gopallohar5534
    @gopallohar5534 Год назад +2

    Development of *Raptor* engine started in 2013....

  • @HarshSingh-eg2nb
    @HarshSingh-eg2nb Год назад +3

    Pls make a difference between semi cryogenic and cryogenic engine

  • @StanStanoi
    @StanStanoi Год назад

    A 7-year-old journey that started in 2016) called OSIRIS-REx to grab an asteroid sample ( a sample grabbed from asteroid BENNU in 2018) delivered to Earth tomorrow for us in asia ( when it is still sunday 24th sept ) there at the Utah desert ( USA ) within an expected 30-mile range. It will be eagerly awaited, and telecast as well - an easy deal to telecast, it is Earth where the drop-off happens and doesn't have to be animated. OSIRIS-REx after dropping it off, will go on to do other missions.

  • @saurabhsingh-ew5re
    @saurabhsingh-ew5re Год назад +1

    02:20 ok bro maan lia aesa ni hota hai....
    🤣🤣🤣 ❤

  • @manishsramon
    @manishsramon Год назад +2

    Whoever is questioning ISRO's decision to derive their preliminary design out of RD series. Most semi cryo sea-level engines in the world are of Soviet Origin. SpaceX's Raptor is also a Soviet Derivative in its preliminary design (RD180), which Elon himself admitted in an old video-look for it. It's just not considered wise to start everythig from scratch. Co-axial Swirl Injector technology is what made Soviets pioneers of Liquid Propellant engines while on the other hand in NASA was busy trying perfecting not so practical impinging injector design (In which they eventually did succeed). After the collapse USSR, NASA somehow managed to got that Soviet technology patented in their own names (Probably by buying some people at the Energomash I guess). Now there are literally enjoying loyalities on Soviets achievements. Well, their (NASA) story is that they invested ~$3 Billion to perfect that technology used in RD-180 cluster that later got incorporated in ULA's Atlas-V rocket.

    • @sidharthcs2110
      @sidharthcs2110 5 месяцев назад

      Ther Merlin is definitely not related to RD 180.
      RD 180 is a closed cycle design

    • @Phantom369-h3i
      @Phantom369-h3i 8 дней назад

      False, Elon just praised the rd-180 for its high chamber pressure and thrust to weight ratio and for making the metallurgy work out for LOX rich engines. He never said that raptor is a derivative of rd-180.

  • @prakhargupta3104
    @prakhargupta3104 Год назад

    I think another reason for chill down is to prevent cavitation during engine start when cold liquid touches hot surface and perhaps the primary reason.

  • @Sorry2701
    @Sorry2701 Год назад +1

    4:25, If we get SC-120 then ADMIRE Test is very near, Because Merlin-1D is same engine as Vikas but with different fuel, Grasshopper was tested with Merlin-1D which is similar to SC-120.

    • @azadahamed9677
      @azadahamed9677 3 месяца назад

      Marlin 1D and vikas are completely different engines. They use different fuels, marlin is regeneratively cooled where vikas is water cooled, the expansion ratio , chamber pressure, specific impulse all are better in marlin. And using hypergolic fuel instead of cryogenic or semi cryogenic fuel is way easier. So both are not the same.

  • @kapilsapre
    @kapilsapre Год назад

    Sir, ur narration is too simple to understand. Keep it up .

  • @HarshSingh-eg2nb
    @HarshSingh-eg2nb Год назад +3

    Is vikas engine is a cryogenic engine.

  • @User86559
    @User86559 Год назад +4

    People thinks reverse engineering is same as ctrl c and ctrl v lol😅

  • @harimohanbajpai8418
    @harimohanbajpai8418 Год назад +1

    Sir please make a video on nuclear fusion reactor 🙏

  • @archuss
    @archuss Год назад +1

    Dear GS subtitles need to be updated..i think

  • @CuriousEngineer
    @CuriousEngineer Год назад +1

    ISRO methelox engine pe bhi Kam kar raha hai right? And awesome video as always keep up the the good work bro. 👍

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +2

      Yes 1000kn thrust. Already tries 100 tonnes wala

    • @CuriousEngineer
      @CuriousEngineer Год назад +1

      @@GareebScientist i hope that SCE200 OUTPERFORM THE THRUST ASPECT JUST LIKE HOW VIKAS ENGINE DID BACK THEN ,PHIR NAYA NAMKARAN HOGA😂

    • @harshitrai5306
      @harshitrai5306 Год назад

      ​@@CuriousEngineer sc200 reusable engine hai kya ?? Ye vertical landing kar sakta hai ??

  • @dipti_dress_designing_tutorial

    Super informative videos

  • @capt.proton5041
    @capt.proton5041 5 месяцев назад

    Isro human moon mission and joining the Artemis mission what is the difference between these two?

  • @KumarK-xn5go
    @KumarK-xn5go 4 месяца назад

    Wonder why ISRO can't use the Vikas engine in cluster mode like the 9 Raptor engines used by Falcon Heavy?

  • @0xbinarylol
    @0xbinarylol Год назад

    🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 gazab cryogenic engine 😊

  • @archuss
    @archuss Год назад +2

    You just can't copy...GS❤

  • @unnouunususer7510
    @unnouunususer7510 Год назад

    At 3:44 what is that smoke slab thing coming out below the tower to the engine flame.
    Is that a coolant of some kind or just the smoke

  • @viralboy007
    @viralboy007 Год назад +1

    Ya engine complete kabtak hoga?

  • @newworld2086
    @newworld2086 Год назад +3

    Will this help in reducing our dependence on ESA for heavy launches?

    • @shrodingerscat8940
      @shrodingerscat8940 Год назад +2

      That problem is due to low production line and only one launchpad for gslv

  • @venkateshbc3912
    @venkateshbc3912 Год назад

    You are Ameer scientist 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @sheetalagarwalla1241
    @sheetalagarwalla1241 Год назад +1

    Bro if this sce 200 engine replaces vikas engine then then we may have gslv mk3 rocket capability equivalent to atlas v 🎉

  • @surajnag3650
    @surajnag3650 Год назад

    Hey bro can you make an informative video on Rocket fuel? Like types of fuel, pros & cons of each types of fuel. I know it would requires a lengthy video & you need to do extra work for that. But brother i think most nerdy folks would be interested in learning about rocket fuels.

  • @pandharisapate9942
    @pandharisapate9942 Год назад +1

    Super method in information

  • @lovepeacehatewar9818
    @lovepeacehatewar9818 Год назад +2

    Bhai 🙏🏻 Please SCE ka Test Kaisa raha Jaldi Suna digiye.
    Kaan Taras raha hai, Bahoot Becheni ho raha hai🤞🤞🤞, All The Best ISRO,💐💐💐💪💪💪🙌🙌🙌👏👏👏

  • @TigerCraft79
    @TigerCraft79 Год назад +2

    GS bro why has ISRO or Indian space companies have not joined/been invited to artemis program, i saw article claiming India is not involved to not anger china because china hates artemis program. What is the case?

  • @jaygagare4333
    @jaygagare4333 Год назад +3

    What will be the weight carrying capacity of this engine?

    • @commieTerminator
      @commieTerminator Год назад

      ~200 tones (It's in the name SCE-200). It sounds a lot for lifting satellites but majority of a rocket's weight is fuel itself

  • @akihokokurosaki
    @akihokokurosaki Год назад +3

    NGLV kb tk operational hoga??

  • @commieTerminator
    @commieTerminator Год назад +5

    What's the expected weight of SCE200?

  • @shrodingerscat8940
    @shrodingerscat8940 Год назад +3

    they also mentioned its capable of 2600kn in the article. does that mean it will a upgraed version like high thrust vikas ?

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +2

      2600kn limit is for the test stand
      Test stands have to have a higher tolerance than the actual

    • @shrodingerscat8940
      @shrodingerscat8940 Год назад +1

      @@GareebScientist if that's the limit then how will they test cluster engine for nglv?

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад +1

      Same doubt

    • @Bablu69_420
      @Bablu69_420 Год назад +1

      @@shrodingerscat8940 Maybe they will upgrade it with time, i guess they are still focusing on single SCE200 engine and clustered variant wont be available anytime soon.

    • @harshitrai5306
      @harshitrai5306 Год назад

      ​​@@Bablu69_420phir bhul jao next 5-10 year nglv rockets aayega or Heavy vehicle , rocket aayega Isro ke pass jo powerful ho

  • @nssdatta
    @nssdatta Год назад +1

    Attendence 🚀

  • @ra8620
    @ra8620 Год назад +5

    USA bought Russian engine to learn combined cycle rocket motor plumbing at 1990 .

  • @thesentientneuron6550
    @thesentientneuron6550 Год назад +2

    Is there any published article on Isrosene? Any idea what makes it differ from RP-1/RG-1?

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад

      Unfortunately couldn't find. From talking to people from isro, what i understood is it's sulphur content is higher than rp1 and coming temperature too higher. No specifics

    • @thesentientneuron6550
      @thesentientneuron6550 Год назад

      @@GareebScientist Thanks! Maybe the higher combustion temp counteracts the higher sulphur content potentially causing a buildup + free ISP boost? Side Note: I wonder if there's any book published on prop chem research conducted in India, like was done in "Ignition!", that would be a cool piece of space history.

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад

      Sorry I meant coking temperature. Yes would be cool to have one

    • @thesentientneuron6550
      @thesentientneuron6550 Год назад

      @@GareebScientist Oh, thanks for the clarification! From some 5-min quick research I'm able to hypothesize that Isrocene may have a higher molecular wt. and thus higher coking temp. but maybe also higher density? What are your thoughts? Ig it makes sense from a strategic perspective? Please keep us updated of any news is shared about this!

    • @Bablu69_420
      @Bablu69_420 Год назад

      I searched the term Isrosene in google i got an article from pib.

  • @anshulsingh8326
    @anshulsingh8326 Год назад +6

    What is their expected power?

    • @mantrachhaya6835
      @mantrachhaya6835 Год назад +4

      I gues about 2MN, it will be proper competition for raptor, but raptor is a methalox, while untill i know, sce200 is kerolox...

  • @alokkumarsahu9318
    @alokkumarsahu9318 Год назад +2

    Is sce-200 reusable?

  • @riscnx
    @riscnx Год назад +1

    I think population systems for ISRO missions is manufactured by MTAR (A Hyderabadi company), not ISRO.

  • @sudo11
    @sudo11 Год назад +2

    ❤️

  • @sandipselar6043
    @sandipselar6043 Год назад

    Great

  • @Kingshukpalchoudhury
    @Kingshukpalchoudhury Год назад

    What is expected thrust to weight ratio of SCE 200?

  • @HemanthKumarJadhav
    @HemanthKumarJadhav Год назад +4

    It would be nice to see a resusable rocket, so that we can resuse these engines again after proper refurbishment. That would save lot of cost and time.

    • @oadka
      @oadka Год назад +3

      Only if the engine has been designed to be able to be refurbished. It might happen that making it reusable (thus sacrificing performance and payload) will cost more than the money saved by reuse. For reusability to work I feel everything has to be designed from the ground up to be reusable.

    • @commieTerminator
      @commieTerminator Год назад +8

      I'd be happy if I can witness a heavy duty reusable ISRO rocket before I die. The speed at which ISRO works is the major concern

    • @HemanthKumarJadhav
      @HemanthKumarJadhav Год назад +1

      @@oadka well, SpaceX does resuse its rockets with Merlin and Raptor engines after refurbishment. Only difference is they use MethLOX as fuel & oxidizer and we use IsrosceneLOX.

    • @HemanthKumarJadhav
      @HemanthKumarJadhav Год назад +2

      @@commieTerminator we don't have the luxury of the funds and have a lot of bureaucratic red tapes for funds to get sanctioned.

    • @kunjukunjunil1481
      @kunjukunjunil1481 Год назад +1

      @@HemanthKumarJadhav Merlin still uses RP1 and oxygen. Only raptor is MethLox

  • @KaustubhBadgujarK2
    @KaustubhBadgujarK2 Год назад

    Sir apko Kay lagta hai ISRO our DRDO mil ke hypersonic missile bana sakte hai kya

  • @mayurcharniya8785
    @mayurcharniya8785 Год назад

    nice

  • @orion8364
    @orion8364 Год назад +1

    Which is better? Lox + RP 1 or Lox + methane?

  • @sandeepshekhar451
    @sandeepshekhar451 Год назад

    Is this close cycle engine and fuel rich or oxygen rich ?

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Год назад

      yes close cycle and fuel rich afaik, but you verify once

  • @abhinavayush967
    @abhinavayush967 Год назад +2

    Chines j15 tiger shark was developed from su33 bought from Ukraine, , they letter develope their own clone .

  • @a.harshvardhan9611
    @a.harshvardhan9611 Год назад +2

    kash, NASA ka jitna budget ISRO ko mil jaye !

    • @gravy4708
      @gravy4708 Год назад +3

      Government ulta ghata rahi hai budget ISRO ka consistently per year

    • @tirthachakrabarti5912
      @tirthachakrabarti5912 Год назад

      @@gravy4708 Nope

    • @gravy4708
      @gravy4708 Год назад

      @@tirthachakrabarti5912 Yes. Kaun si duniya me jee raha hai be tu

  • @2603insantosh
    @2603insantosh Год назад

    At present the maximum that we can lift is 8 ton i guess. With the new rock technology, how much more can we lift.. is it more than 20 ton. How many tons would a human moon mission require

  • @mauryasamrat935
    @mauryasamrat935 Год назад

    सर इसरो के मून लैंडिंग के लाइव विवर 8M थे इससे इसरो को कितने रुपए का फायदा हो जायेगा यूट्यूब के माध्यम से
    सर अगर फायदा ज्यादा है तो isro official को प्रमोट नही किया आप ने

  • @sidharthcs2110
    @sidharthcs2110 Год назад +1

    Why don't you make a video on what makes something a copy of something else.

  • @icfak27704
    @icfak27704 Год назад

    Bro make video of gslv future update

    • @icfak27704
      @icfak27704 Год назад

      Ulv and HIV kab tak aayega

  • @mantrachhaya6835
    @mantrachhaya6835 Год назад +2

    The be-4 engine was in development for so long, and stil lis in development, while the raptor is already ahead of it, it's like blue origin does not even care about it anymore, and when nasa favour spacex for being a chesper and trustworthy bet these companies complain about competition and political support to spacex...

  • @mauryasamrat935
    @mauryasamrat935 Год назад

    भारत के देश भक्तो की देश भक्ति के कुछ तथ्य ISRO official यूट्यूब चैनल पर 3 मिलियन सब्सक्राइबर है जबकि आज के लैंडिंग के व्यूज 64 मिलियन है।Nasa के यूट्यूब चैनल के 11 मिलियन सब्सक्राइबर हैSpacex के 6M

  • @pronavgaming_69
    @pronavgaming_69 Год назад

    Too true
    Warna to Nissan ki bhi supra banti

  • @cosmicfactz
    @cosmicfactz Год назад

    How to witness launch of isro Rockets anyone please help me with this

  • @shubhams5455
    @shubhams5455 Год назад +1

    Why Isro Didn't took baseline technology of CE 20 Engine to Develop a CE200 engine like Nasas RS 25, No one would've dared ISRO to say Copycat

  • @KumarK-xn5go
    @KumarK-xn5go Год назад

    It will be a great achievement for ISRO once they perfect the tech. As far as copying goes haven't various technologies been copied by the west too?

  • @harshaprasad8666
    @harshaprasad8666 Год назад

    1:52 haa he toh kya😂

  • @sundarjoshi6568
    @sundarjoshi6568 6 месяцев назад

    After 14 years of work and spending almost Rs 1800 crore they start testing this engine.....ISRO's pace is very slow.

  • @priyajain8190
    @priyajain8190 Год назад

    Gareeb scientist Chandrayaan -3 is going to launch at July 12 and landing at the moon Aug 23 can you please make a video about it.

  • @sgt-Badger
    @sgt-Badger Год назад +2

    Private space companies ka kya scope hai?

    • @r.a.wscientists
      @r.a.wscientists Год назад

      it depends on which company ur talking about

    • @rishabhshuklaa1
      @rishabhshuklaa1 Год назад +4

      Parts bnane wali companies kafi fayde me rahengi...

  • @jaymahakailchannel9109
    @jaymahakailchannel9109 Год назад

    ?But sir methan is good option than hydrogen i thing so and less costly

  • @rakesh96846
    @rakesh96846 Год назад

    🎉🎉