Stop devaluing the term "Antisemitism". Criticizing Israel's ethnic cleansing and genocide of Palestinians is not antisemitic. Never again means never again for anyone.
But she is worried about wearing her Star of David... that's much worse than 40,000 people including children's death... We should focus on that instead.
This is an absurd "strawman" argument. Nobody has suggested that it would be antisemitic for someone to ask why Israel is bombing Syria, nor for a country to defend itself against an attack by Israel. My suggestion would be to actually read the definition of "antisemitism" being applied here before commenting on it further.
@@canitbethat you need to a bıt try to perceive what is happening around you. Using cliche terms like 'straw man argument' does not make your comment any meaningful. What the person commented is perfect point he or she making. Any criticism of Israel's actions anyone gets blamed with antisemitism. I can't believe I have to explain this to you, it is a basic understanding of this issue, but hey hopefully it helped why he used it and how it makes the perfect sense unlike yours.
@canitbethat but according to Israel, it is antisemitic to recognise Palestine (Palestinians too are Semitic.... but not according to Israelis, despite it being confirmed that they are in their own Torah), it is also antisemitic to prosecute Israeli leaders for crimes against humanity, including genocide!
@@Richard1A2B This video is about the adoption of a definition of "antisemitism" by the German government, not Israel. Have you read that definition, and do you claim that it would call the examples you give here "antisemitic?" If not, why is your point relevant in this context?
@@canitbethat u wanna play words game , "strawman argument" , is this definition of antisemitism, its this other definition.... i call this playing words game. U ask a question and we have to stop the whole World and not think of nothing what has happened before this german resolution, not think why the germans r doing this, not think why at this time, not think who affects...not think of the thousands of dead, not think of the genocide going on as we texting...not think of obsolutely nothingggg....just answer the question u r asking and the answer to be how u like it, how suits u, posibly to read your mind and type it here would be great. Pfff..
¿You cannot discuss the existence of a state? ¿Can you not discuss the convenience of German reunification, the breaking apart of the USSR, the independence of Scotland or Catalonia, the creation of a Federal Europe? ¿Discussing any of these topics is a crime? ¡Of course not! Discussing the convenience of a political body is not a crime even if a fascist law says it is. The state of Israel is no different. Political bodies may or may not exist and people have the right to discuss their convenience.
On the matter: you mean Palestinian people in Palestine should have been given sovereignty and the safety of a state as much as everybody else from the start in the early 1900s, then we would not have far right apartheit succeed in insrael politics and hundreds of thousands of people would still be alive, - ? And whatever people want to discuss, they should be allowed to discuss it - ?
Well, reading the actual IHRA definition of "antisemitism," I don't see why any well-intentioned person would want to say anything it actually proscribes, even if they disagree with Israeli government policy. So, if this is what Germany has just adopted, I don't see how it's a threat to freedom. Why do you think it is?
I think the references to Israel in the IHRA definition of "antisemitism" are reasonable, and the examples there that involve Israel really are antisemitic. If you don't, why not?
They keep saying Israel has the right to exist but it is already existing.I think that it is Palestine that needs self determination-the right to exist
The idea of eliminating unwanted opinions through bans is absurd. Most people know absolutely nothing about Judaism. That would be a starting point for addressing antisemitism. But unfortunately, when it comes to this topic, you can't expect a rational and balanced approach from our MPs, as they have now proven several times.
I don't see how the IHRA definition of "antisemitism" would cover ordinary criticism of criminal acts on the part of the Israeli government that isn't made in antisemitic ways. If Germany is discouraging antisemitic speech based on that definition, how would that do what you claim here?
@@ArcangeldelFuego I assume you mean that those accused of genocide should be put on trial, and in case you hadn't heard, Israel is on trial right now before the ICJ for exactly this. So, again, what's your point?
Germany is colonized, Germany has no saying in foreign policy. we have lost ww2, you think they didnt colonize us completly militarily without other conditions? even thou the biggest US base outside of USA is in germany. 100k US soldiers in any given moment are in Germany. basicly AIPAC controlls germany by controlling USA
Wehret den Anfängen! Jude oder nicht, Ungerechtigkeiten sind Ungerechtigkeiten für ALLE. Statt neue Gesetze, bestehende durchsetzen: keine Waffen liefern bei Genozid Verdacht, wenn nur aus Vorsichtsmaßnahme.
They play the same game in the USA which is why antisemitism is losing all meaning. Candace Owens was named antisemite of the year and people just laughed about it.
All the isms and phobic charges have lost their power in the US. People are tired of being called names and judged by those who couldn't survive the first stone.
As I understand it, this report is saying that Germany is adopting the IHRA definition of "antisemitism." Have you read it, and do you have a specific problem with it?
Its absurd and dangerous to devalue the trrm 'antisemetism' by accusing everyone who critiques a state and government that routinely breaks international law of being atisemites. Some Israeli officials just accused the entire nation of Ireland of being 'antisemitic'. It completely waters down the very real problem of actual antisemitism, which is most certainly not about just critiquing Israel.
exactly, if you want to avoid being in the losing annd the wrong side of history, just wait till German make thier Choice. and chose anything other than what they have chosen
Under US law it is illegal to provide weapons to a country found to be in violation of International Humanitarian Law and the Leahy Act…Unless you’re Israel.
This is factually false. There will be violations of international law committed by soldiers in any army, so the requirement isn't that the country's army commit no violations, but that they follow up adequately on any ("gross") violations that are committed. The Department of State is empowered to determine whether the follow-up has been adequate, and in the case of Israel, they have determined that the investigations, prosecutions, etc., have been adequate so far. If you're sufficiently well informed about each violation and follow-up, you can take issue with the State Department's judgement on this, but there's been no violation of the Leahy Act.
It is also illegal under US law to provide weapons to a nuclear power who is a non signatory of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. (Symington-Glenn amendments)…Of course Israel likes to play cute with it’s nuclear ambiguity, barring IAEA inspectors.
@@ChristelvPost That is true!! Stop lying! It was happening even before this genocide when large massacres were happening and a few dared to speak out Germany proudly announced that those students will be kicked out of dormitorıes! And they did! And now it is true that they got expelled! Stop your arrogance and cover up wıth your exclamation marks!
We learn history not for the sake of mapping out the past, but to learn for the future. If Germany really wants to "learn from the holocaust", to come to terms with its historic guilt and responsibility, then it must ensure that something like that is never happening again
@3:26 This response is exactly why ppl are not trusting that term and call those who use it “the little boy who cried wolf”. Eventually, ppl don’t respond when there is a wolf because of all the times they did respond and there was no wolf.
Did I clearly hear her say the holocaust was "the biggest genocide in history"? What a nonsensical statement. What do you say of Leopold's genocide in the Congo? Are the 13 million Congolese less humans?
And don't forget the about 165 million deaths the British Empire produced between 1880 and 1920 in India alone... and the pride the Brits have until today for their colonialism. It's the industrialized way of mass murder which makes the Holocaust exeptional, not the bodycount.
The evil people who hide behind religion to commit their crimes will continue to find something else to hide behind to continue to commit their crimes. If you think religion is the issue and not those people, then they really succeeded in their camouflage!
I have concerns that the resolution will actually damage the image of Germany, this will not stop Criticism of Israel and this could lead to repercussions from bad actors exploiting this.
That world doesn’t work anymore !! That guy can talk all the way calm and kind as hime wants but the truth of the real modern face of Izraell is on the table in clear sight for the eyes that wants to see…
ISRAEL ist ein Volk, das sich gegen den islamischen Staat Iran wehrt und seinen Proxies= Hisbollah/ Hamas, die Israel auslöschen möchten!! Israel muss seine Bevölkerung vor diesen Terroristen beschützen.
It's every state's responsibility to protect the minorities within its borders. Germany, despite its past, should be like any other state in that matter and treat Israel like any other country.
Glad to hear that after so long in German mainstream media this topic is analyzed deeper. For now even in Yt there is censorship for most private blogs - they have to call that country "a state South of Litani River and North of Sinai" to avoid demonetization, no matter of content and opinion, just presence of certain words is bad.
It is imperative to recognize that while you attempt to distance yourselves from your past, your current support for Israel raises serious moral contradictions. Historical injustices cannot be ignored, and turning a blind eye to ongoing abuses only serves to perpetuate a cycle of denial and complicity. The phrase “never again” should hold true universally, yet it appears that Germany selectively applies this principle when it suits its narrative. Nations across Africa, Asia, South America, and Europe are watching, and they see a troubling pattern: Germany is enabling policies that resonate with ethnic supremacy while ignoring the cries for justice from numerous voices around the world. Your history should serve as a warning against extremism and discrimination, not as an excuse for continued injustice. If most of the global community condemns actions that echo past atrocities, it's time for Germany to engage in some serious self-reflection rather than standing by in support of those actions. We demand that Germany uphold the principles of justice and equality, taking a clear stance against any form of oppression. It’s time for accountability and true moral leadership, not complicity in furthering historical wrongs. This is not antisemitic
Thank you for this excellent example of how a comment ostensibly about Israel can actually be thinly veiled antisemitic hate speech. This is very helpful to the discussion of this video.
"10s of thousands have been killed after Israel started it's war against Hamas". Doesn't DW realise how non sensical that is? How can 10s of thousands die when Israel is purely targeting Hamas? It can only happen if Israel starts a war against the Gazan everyday people
This resolution doesn't ban anything. It only gives a definition, the most well-accepted definition of antisemitism among antisemitism scholars, which is the IHRA definition and criticizes said antisemitism. That's all this resolution does, it is a resolution after all, a simple declaration of intentions, it's not a law, there are no consequences if people criticize, slam or attack Israel. The most this can do is that private individuals(!) and public institutions on a local level may(!) look at this definition of antisemitism and not give their own or public money to antisemites.
as religion is the main point of fight, let the leaders of the two religion have a meeting to set a harmony agreements. No one should be discriminated by religion, killed/harassed because of beliefs. No one can draw sign/bear any sign. At first human life then religion and others. Tolerance, compromise and respect to each other in every form of expressions are the solutions. May Allah give all of us patience, tolerance and love for each other. When you are so far away from the main Objectives of a religion then this fight happens. Fight happens among the disbelievers and the less religious people. Praying everyday doesn’t make you religious. Religious education matters. A little learning is always a dangerous thing.
Could this be considered an example of how the judicial branch of government attempts to contain the narrative within what is considered a permissible framework?
They are so ashamed of themselves for what they did that they will let pass the most horrific things putting international law aside to protect the nazionist. Germany is always in the wrong side of history.
Freedom of Speech and Conscience are at the heart of human freedom. But throwing around charges of Fascism against your political enemies in the home of the Grandmasters of Fascism is more than ironic. The name-calling on all sides much stop. Especially by the elites who have lost their moral authority to make these imprecise distinctions.
it does not have the right to kill thousands of children because they claim that there are terrorists in the schools. It is Israel's military that is attacking innocent civilians more than any Hamas and Hezbollah combined.
...you mean of lately - Antisemitism existed in Europe for almost 2000 years, but just when we thought that we had almos managed to overcome it, the people you mentioned succeeded in letting it out again from the bottle with force
My problem with this video ist that I found it extremely difficult to understand the main presenter. She speaks much too quickly for me to follow all that she says - and I my English is mother-tongue level. I suggest that she be replaced, or at least - my preferred option - that she be given advanced training on public speaking.
Lol. If you had attempted to make this post before with correct spelling, and it had not posted...that is pretty funny, and on multiple levels. However, I'm inclined to believe it is actually not due to censorship of this specific topic, or that specific word. RUclips has become much less reliable in the last five years at posting comments in general, regardless of topic (at least in my experience).
Ausgewogen?? Die Resulution sagt nur: "Das Intuition oder Personen, die gegen die Existenz Israelis sind, kein Geld mehr bekommen. Und das ist richtig und wichtig!!!
If threath of being antisemititic is used to support worse than the worst example of word; a) germany really aint changed in its support of crimes against humanity b) is double standard implying victims cant do same or as it apears worse, when in power c) word should really loose all of its social impact, for betterment of the word.
Who voted? Only the politcians in the Bundestag voted. They are there for their personal interests of continuing Israel's Genocide in Gaza. At least have some basic knowledge on this subject.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Stop devaluing the term "Antisemitism". Criticizing Israel's ethnic cleansing and genocide of Palestinians is not antisemitic. Never again means never again for anyone.
But she is worried about wearing her Star of David... that's much worse than 40,000 people including children's death... We should focus on that instead.
The more you try to silence the critics, the more you defend a genocide. The more hate you will create.
Why is Israel bombmbing Syria? Or its antisemitism to ask? And..has Syria the right to defend itself? Again antisemitism? How does this work?
This is an absurd "strawman" argument. Nobody has suggested that it would be antisemitic for someone to ask why Israel is bombing Syria, nor for a country to defend itself against an attack by Israel. My suggestion would be to actually read the definition of "antisemitism" being applied here before commenting on it further.
@@canitbethat you need to a bıt try to perceive what is happening around you. Using cliche terms like 'straw man argument' does not make your comment any meaningful.
What the person commented is perfect point he or she making. Any criticism of Israel's actions anyone gets blamed with antisemitism. I can't believe I have to explain this to you, it is a basic understanding of this issue, but hey hopefully it helped why he used it and how it makes the perfect sense unlike yours.
@canitbethat but according to Israel, it is antisemitic to recognise Palestine (Palestinians too are Semitic.... but not according to Israelis, despite it being confirmed that they are in their own Torah), it is also antisemitic to prosecute Israeli leaders for crimes against humanity, including genocide!
@@Richard1A2B This video is about the adoption of a definition of "antisemitism" by the German government, not Israel. Have you read that definition, and do you claim that it would call the examples you give here "antisemitic?" If not, why is your point relevant in this context?
@@canitbethat u wanna play words game , "strawman argument" , is this definition of antisemitism, its this other definition.... i call this playing words game. U ask a question and we have to stop the whole World and not think of nothing what has happened before this german resolution, not think why the germans r doing this, not think why at this time, not think who affects...not think of the thousands of dead, not think of the genocide going on as we texting...not think of obsolutely nothingggg....just answer the question u r asking and the answer to be how u like it, how suits u, posibly to read your mind and type it here would be great. Pfff..
¿You cannot discuss the existence of a state? ¿Can you not discuss the convenience of German reunification, the breaking apart of the USSR, the independence of Scotland or Catalonia, the creation of a Federal Europe? ¿Discussing any of these topics is a crime? ¡Of course not! Discussing the convenience of a political body is not a crime even if a fascist law says it is. The state of Israel is no different. Political bodies may or may not exist and people have the right to discuss their convenience.
On the matter: you mean Palestinian people in Palestine should have been given sovereignty and the safety of a state as much as everybody else from the start in the early 1900s, then we would not have far right apartheit succeed in insrael politics and hundreds of thousands of people would still be alive, - ? And whatever people want to discuss, they should be allowed to discuss it - ?
so if israel killed another 40 thousands in gaza and injured another 60 thousands we still considered antisimite if we critisie israel
It is unbelievable. I am very anxious about freedom in Germany.
If you are, why don’t you return to Turkey?
Well, reading the actual IHRA definition of "antisemitism," I don't see why any well-intentioned person would want to say anything it actually proscribes, even if they disagree with Israeli government policy. So, if this is what Germany has just adopted, I don't see how it's a threat to freedom. Why do you think it is?
@@Greyhound10075 What a strawman argument, if we are concerned about freedom in China or Russia we should leave the country?
1- This will backfire
2- Germany always seems to be on the wrong side of History
Any definition of antisemitism that includes the word "Israel" is obviously incorrect
ahahahah says who?
I think the references to Israel in the IHRA definition of "antisemitism" are reasonable, and the examples there that involve Israel really are antisemitic. If you don't, why not?
You have no idea what you are talking about.
They keep saying Israel has the right to exist but it is already existing.I think that it is Palestine that needs self determination-the right to exist
The idea of eliminating unwanted opinions through bans is absurd. Most people know absolutely nothing about Judaism. That would be a starting point for addressing antisemitism. But unfortunately, when it comes to this topic, you can't expect a rational and balanced approach from our MPs, as they have now proven several times.
Yes it’s does stifle criticism of criminal acts being committed.
I don't see how the IHRA definition of "antisemitism" would cover ordinary criticism of criminal acts on the part of the Israeli government that isn't made in antisemitic ways. If Germany is discouraging antisemitic speech based on that definition, how would that do what you claim here?
Why not make a law against genocide ?
There already is, both in Germany and internationally. What's your point?
@@canitbethat That it should be enforced and not allowed because if historical guilt
@@ArcangeldelFuego I assume you mean that those accused of genocide should be put on trial, and in case you hadn't heard, Israel is on trial right now before the ICJ for exactly this. So, again, what's your point?
@canitbethat then why can’t Germany follow these genocide laws and stop supporting the terrorist state of Israel?
@@canitbethat why then go on supporting genocide, verbally as practically with weapon deliveries?
Germany passing authoritarian laws restricting free speech? Reminds me of something...
Free speech shouldn’t mean hate speech
The problem with your statement is that what is hate speech is opinions based.
After WW2 freedom of thought and free speech in future Germany was never on the agenda of the new masters...
the natzees didn’t rise to power because Germany over did it on protecting minorities if that really what worries you.
@@MetalGear1 How is it hate speach to critizize Israel?
Didn’t realize AIPAC has expanded to Germany.
This has nothing to do with Israel.
@シギ-p2f Sure thing buddy.
Have been since 1945
Aipac in usa, but europe has rothchilds.
Germany is colonized, Germany has no saying in foreign policy. we have lost ww2, you think they didnt colonize us completly militarily without other conditions? even thou the biggest US base outside of USA is in germany. 100k US soldiers in any given moment are in Germany. basicly AIPAC controlls germany by controlling USA
Good luck Germany. Germany needs badly and quickly new politicians, new thinking and new direction.
Germany always felt so comfortable with genocide. No wonder this path once again.
Maybe they have the trademark, no one can commit genocide without Germany involved directly or indirectly... who knows?
Wehret den Anfängen! Jude oder nicht, Ungerechtigkeiten sind Ungerechtigkeiten für ALLE. Statt neue Gesetze, bestehende durchsetzen: keine Waffen liefern bei Genozid Verdacht, wenn nur aus Vorsichtsmaßnahme.
Im Fall Israel ist das ja wohl kaum "Vorsichtsmassnahme".
Never again is now doesnt apply for palestinians 😢
They play the same game in the USA which is why antisemitism is losing all meaning.
Candace Owens was named antisemite of the year and people just laughed about it.
All the isms and phobic charges have lost their power in the US. People are tired of being called names and judged by those who couldn't survive the first stone.
As I understand it, this report is saying that Germany is adopting the IHRA definition of "antisemitism." Have you read it, and do you have a specific problem with it?
@@canitbethat yes, the IHRA is itself extremely antisemitic as it explicitly equates Israel with Judaism, which is unironically literal blood libel...
Its absurd and dangerous to devalue the trrm 'antisemetism' by accusing everyone who critiques a state and government that routinely breaks international law of being atisemites. Some Israeli officials just accused the entire nation of Ireland of being 'antisemitic'. It completely waters down the very real problem of actual antisemitism, which is most certainly not about just critiquing Israel.
What’s that saying about who you can’t critique is your controller
If you want to know who’s oppressing you, pay attention to who you’re not allowed to criticize or accuse
It isn’t a “war in Gaza”! It’s a genocide. I’m supposed to be an ignorant American, and I’m more capable of speaking on the subject.
Germany is always in the wrong side of history
It's kinda of not since trying to stop hate speech from communities, like your's.🤷🏻
WRONG
Not always, but in this case.
exactly, if you want to avoid being in the losing annd the wrong side of history, just wait till German make thier Choice. and chose anything other than what they have chosen
no.
Germany is determined to be on the WRONG SIDE of history again.
To know who controls you, pay attention to who you're not allowed to criticize.
Is it really that difficult to mention the 300k Palestinians that live in Germany? Is it really so hard to acknowledge them?
Netanyahu claimed that the arrest order against him is antisemitic... The word lost all its value.
Yes, they do they same across the world. Like Ireland.
Under US law it is illegal to provide weapons to a country found to be in violation of International Humanitarian Law and the Leahy Act…Unless you’re Israel.
This is factually false. There will be violations of international law committed by soldiers in any army, so the requirement isn't that the country's army commit no violations, but that they follow up adequately on any ("gross") violations that are committed. The Department of State is empowered to determine whether the follow-up has been adequate, and in the case of Israel, they have determined that the investigations, prosecutions, etc., have been adequate so far. If you're sufficiently well informed about each violation and follow-up, you can take issue with the State Department's judgement on this, but there's been no violation of the Leahy Act.
ProPublica 9/24/24 “Israel Deliberately Blocked Humanitarian Aid to Gaza, Two Government Bodies Concluded. Antony Blinken Rejected Them”
It is also illegal under US law to provide weapons to a nuclear power who is a non signatory of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. (Symington-Glenn amendments)…Of course Israel likes to play cute with it’s nuclear ambiguity, barring IAEA inspectors.
@@kevinjenner9502 Why is any of this relevant to Germany's antisemitism resolution (the subject of the video on which you're commenting here)?
Actually lots of foreign students who are concerned about gaza get expelled from german universitys 😢
Das stimmt nicht!!!!
@@ChristelvPost That is true!! Stop lying! It was happening even before this genocide when large massacres were happening and a few dared to speak out Germany proudly announced that those students will be kicked out of dormitorıes! And they did! And now it is true that they got expelled! Stop your arrogance and cover up wıth your exclamation marks!
Germany always stands with genocide and evil ?
We learn history not for the sake of mapping out the past, but to learn for the future.
If Germany really wants to "learn from the holocaust", to come to terms with its historic guilt and responsibility, then it must ensure that something like that is never happening again
@3:26 This response is exactly why ppl are not trusting that term and call those who use it “the little boy who cried wolf”. Eventually, ppl don’t respond when there is a wolf because of all the times they did respond and there was no wolf.
In other news: Germany has abandonded democracy because freedom of speech makes them uncomfortable. 😂
Did I clearly hear her say the holocaust was "the biggest genocide in history"? What a nonsensical statement. What do you say of Leopold's genocide in the Congo? Are the 13 million Congolese less humans?
Let alone native Americans
And don't forget the about 165 million deaths the British Empire produced between 1880 and 1920 in India alone... and the pride the Brits have until today for their colonialism.
It's the industrialized way of mass murder which makes the Holocaust exeptional, not the bodycount.
Thank you Amnesty International. ❤️❣️❤️
Such a joke! Europeans committed holocaust and Palestinians paid the bill
Religion! Imagine how great the world would be without it..
Guess what bad things will still happen
The evil people who hide behind religion to commit their crimes will continue to find something else to hide behind to continue to commit their crimes. If you think religion is the issue and not those people, then they really succeeded in their camouflage!
I have concerns that the resolution will actually damage the image of Germany, this will not stop Criticism of Israel and this could lead to repercussions from bad actors exploiting this.
what Image
That world doesn’t work anymore !! That guy can talk all the way calm and kind as hime wants but the truth of the real modern face of Izraell is on the table in clear sight for the eyes that wants to see…
ISRAEL ist ein Volk, das sich gegen den islamischen Staat Iran wehrt und seinen Proxies= Hisbollah/ Hamas, die Israel auslöschen möchten!!
Israel muss seine Bevölkerung vor diesen Terroristen beschützen.
I'm beginning to think that Germany has a penchant for villainy...
Naturally another DW report without any inclusion of Palestenian point of view....
It's every state's responsibility to protect the minorities within its borders. Germany, despite its past, should be like any other state in that matter and treat Israel like any other country.
German definition of never again = everyday in Palestine.
Yes and the same goes for here in the US
Stop with the isms
Poor Germans... poor world. Long live Palestine!
Face it, it’s not Germans who are doing it, it’s new arrivals with a piece of paper saying they are German.
Glad to hear that after so long in German mainstream media this topic is analyzed deeper. For now even in Yt there is censorship for most private blogs - they have to call that country "a state South of Litani River and North of Sinai" to avoid demonetization, no matter of content and opinion, just presence of certain words is bad.
It is imperative to recognize that while you attempt to distance yourselves from your past, your current support for Israel raises serious moral contradictions. Historical injustices cannot be ignored, and turning a blind eye to ongoing abuses only serves to perpetuate a cycle of denial and complicity.
The phrase “never again” should hold true universally, yet it appears that Germany selectively applies this principle when it suits its narrative. Nations across Africa, Asia, South America, and Europe are watching, and they see a troubling pattern: Germany is enabling policies that resonate with ethnic supremacy while ignoring the cries for justice from numerous voices around the world.
Your history should serve as a warning against extremism and discrimination, not as an excuse for continued injustice. If most of the global community condemns actions that echo past atrocities, it's time for Germany to engage in some serious self-reflection rather than standing by in support of those actions.
We demand that Germany uphold the principles of justice and equality, taking a clear stance against any form of oppression. It’s time for accountability and true moral leadership, not complicity in furthering historical wrongs.
This is not antisemitic
Don’t conflate anti-zionism with anti-semitism.
Israel soon to close embassy in Ireland…Here’s to a better smelling Ireland.
I think the other way around
That comment is uncalled for. Please debate your points without insults.
@@lisilein2 get off your high horse
yikes 😕
Thank you for this excellent example of how a comment ostensibly about Israel can actually be thinly veiled antisemitic hate speech. This is very helpful to the discussion of this video.
germany has been neutered from ww2 that in this subject, they would not want the optics to frame them in past negative light
Omg, this is beyond sick..
I respect german's views about israel but just because they are an appologetic nation, they have no right to tell me to do what they want me to.
Is a German "resolution" equivalent to a law in the rest of the world?
Criticize Netanyahu as much as you want, but Leave the people of Israel in peace!
What if some people in israel do crimes?
Netanyahu flies the bombers alone?
where do u think all the illegal settlers come from?
@@gaborrajnai6213 ahahaha u cant change nothing
@@Leaf8823 ahahah what else??
Yes
"10s of thousands have been killed after Israel started it's war against Hamas". Doesn't DW realise how non sensical that is? How can 10s of thousands die when Israel is purely targeting Hamas? It can only happen if Israel starts a war against the Gazan everyday people
This resolution doesn't ban anything. It only gives a definition, the most well-accepted definition of antisemitism among antisemitism scholars, which is the IHRA definition and criticizes said antisemitism. That's all this resolution does, it is a resolution after all, a simple declaration of intentions, it's not a law, there are no consequences if people criticize, slam or attack Israel.
The most this can do is that private individuals(!) and public institutions on a local level may(!) look at this definition of antisemitism and not give their own or public money to antisemites.
Exactly, dieser Beitrag war einfach völlig daneben!!
If opposing genocide, supporting peace & human rights makes me antisemitic, I'll gladly wear the label.
as religion is the main point of fight, let the leaders of the two religion have a meeting to set a harmony agreements. No one should be discriminated by religion, killed/harassed because of beliefs. No one can draw sign/bear any sign. At first human life then religion and others. Tolerance, compromise and respect to each other in every form of expressions are the solutions. May Allah give all of us patience, tolerance and love for each other. When you are so far away from the main Objectives of a religion then this fight happens. Fight happens among the disbelievers and the less religious people. Praying everyday doesn’t make you religious. Religious education matters. A little learning is always a dangerous thing.
Germany has lost its moral compass.
DW has weird undertones of late. Antisemitism has no place in Germany!
And antizionism is not antisemitism. Like it or not.
Could this be considered an example of how the judicial branch of government attempts to contain the narrative within what is considered a permissible framework?
2:53 how is showing star of david antisemitic? 🤔
They are so ashamed of themselves for what they did that they will let pass the most horrific things putting international law aside to protect the nazionist. Germany is always in the wrong side of history.
antisemitism has been rising and has been coinciding with Islamaphobia. Why this was left out?? I don't know
Germany has become a bad joke.
am israel chai
❤🎗🇩🇪🇮🇱🎗❤
Dianna is just The Best!!! 👍😎
Get Well and Come Back Soon!!! 💖🥰🙏💕
Freedom of Speech and Conscience are at the heart of human freedom. But throwing around charges of Fascism against your political enemies in the home of the Grandmasters of Fascism is more than ironic. The name-calling on all sides much stop. Especially by the elites who have lost their moral authority to make these imprecise distinctions.
Antisemitism?!? 😂😂😂 what a joke
If you want to know a country which is not control by Israel criticise Israel and wait for out come
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend".
israel has a right to defend itself
So do Palestinians.
it does not have the right to kill thousands of children because they claim that there are terrorists in the schools. It is Israel's military that is attacking innocent civilians more than any Hamas and Hezbollah combined.
Palestinians are not being very sucessfull at it, right?
Kinda seems more like an offensive to take land more than a defensive move
While killing innocent children more than thousands? It's not genocide?
DW working 24 hours to promote Jihadists, Investigate DW’s financial dealings with Iran.
Antisemitism came first of all from turkey and syria,iraq
...you mean of lately - Antisemitism existed in Europe for almost 2000 years, but just when we thought that we had almos managed to overcome it, the people you mentioned succeeded in letting it out again from the bottle with force
Antisomething
What about the right to existence of the GDR?
Didn't you get the memo?😅
Die gedanken sind frei 😉
My problem with this video ist that I found it extremely difficult to understand the main presenter. She speaks much too quickly for me to follow all that she says - and I my English is mother-tongue level. I suggest that she be replaced, or at least - my preferred option - that she be given advanced training on public speaking.
😂 this post is full of lies. Checks all the brainwashing boxes
Ja, sehe ich genauso!!
❤🎗🇮🇱🇩🇪🎗❤
This news report is extremely antisemantic. Thank you YT for making writing correctly spelled comments impossible. The censorship says it all.
Lol. If you had attempted to make this post before with correct spelling, and it had not posted...that is pretty funny, and on multiple levels.
However, I'm inclined to believe it is actually not due to censorship of this specific topic, or that specific word. RUclips has become much less reliable in the last five years at posting comments in general, regardless of topic (at least in my experience).
Ati semetic is bad
Maybe don't look at the groups of people and help all.....
God bless Germany.
God bless Israel.
I don't think he's blessing either one sorry
God Bless United States of America.
No, because DW will always criticise Israel.
Thanks for confirming you're weaponising antisemitism to shutdown criticism of a rogue state.
OH DEAR!
You would be hard pressed to find this kind of balanced reporting in most of Germany’s media. Yes it exists. But 99% would self censor this.
Ausgewogen??
Die Resulution sagt nur:
"Das Intuition oder Personen, die gegen die Existenz Israelis sind, kein Geld mehr bekommen.
Und das ist richtig und wichtig!!!
If threath of being antisemititic is used to support worse than the worst example of word; a) germany really aint changed in its support of crimes against humanity b) is double standard implying victims cant do same or as it apears worse, when in power c) word should really loose all of its social impact, for betterment of the word.
Democracy in action stop crying. Majority voted for it so if you don't like it leave
Who voted? Only the politcians in the Bundestag voted. They are there for their personal interests of continuing Israel's Genocide in Gaza. At least have some basic knowledge on this subject.
So if 51% vote to enslave 49%, you'd be fine with it?
most german citizens are critical of israel. so this is not democractic but rather a defense of corporate interests.
@@bucketlistreviews6593 and who voted for these politicians genius? - can you put one and one together or do i have to come hold your hand?
'Democracy is two wolves deciding what's for dinner a Republic is a well-armed sheep discussing the decision' mob rule is democracy
israel exists and a lot of jews live there.. connect the dots
Yes, it is the only reason for this law.
Poor Germans... poor world. Long live Palestine!
Poor Germans... poor world. Long live Palestine!
Poor Germans... poor world. Long live Palestine!