this is like the only year where this system would've been more tense, but I still prefer the current system, since 439 point landslides in the televote are supremely uncommon
Nah the older system is more tense because any country could be called out at any time, but in the new system everyone sits back until it's their turn.
In this system we wouldn't be sure who will win to the last moment, because when I heard that Ukraine received more than 400 points it was obvious that they have just won, and watching Sweden, Spain, and UK receiving their points wasn't emotional at all
@@АртемДовгаль-ф6л But we still wouldn't know if thay country has won. They could be in first by only 1 point difference while they didn't have many jury votes, or at least not enough jury votes. The suspense would be there until the last points were announced
For normal contests like 2019 or 2021 it makes the suspense last until the very last second, obviously no suspense was there for 2022, we’ve known it for 3 months and I don’t know why I even bothered hoping for Ukraine not to win because literally this year was just shitty (the contest was absolutely awesome, but the only fact that they won ruined it all)
@@thisbabyslays actually you can already know the final result, under every type of voting announce system, as soon as the second last country is announced, since there's a grand total of 116*n (n equals the number of countries voting) points to be assigned, you can just subtract all the points already assigned and see the final result
@@aleksaranitovic You do not take into account the fact that Serbia receives the maximum points from their neighbors, plus the diaspora of Serbia and Moldova/Romania
@@dabrat4149 almost everyone have neighboring countries, the fact is that In Corpore Sano was smash hit on Balkans and through out Europe. But in the end you're also wrong, cause Serbia didn't receive points from only 2 countries in televote.
Switch Azerbaijan, Belgium and Switzerland’s jury points with Lithuania, Estonia and Poland’s jury points and I actually would’ve been kinda satisfied with the jury vote
@Aela Ooh, well done! That's interesting, no drastic changes then in regards to the top 5 😅 I wondered if it would have been very different. Thanks for working out and sharing 🙂
With 0 points, it is Switzerland. With 2 points, it is Australia. With 3 points, it is Azerbaijan. With 5 points, it is Czech Republic. With the same amount of 5 points, it is Belgium. With 6 points, it is Germany. With 8 points, it is France. With 10 points, it is Iceland. With 21 points, it is Armenia. With 26 points, it is Finland. With 36 points, it is Portugal. With 42 points, it is The Netherlands. With 53 points, it is Romania. With 57 points, it is Greece. With 93 points, it is Lithuania.
@@C-handle-r More intrigue because when bottom jury country gey 200+ ponits, for example, Moldova or Norway 2019. We don't know Have country who get more or no.
Back to corrupt televoting alone, say hello to 12 points from all neighbouring countries. No. I'm from Belgium, and we were continuously screwed, because we didn't have to expect 10 or 12 points from France, Germany or the Netherlands. I think the mixed results from juries and televoting is the best.
@@artsrunkhangeldyan83 Of course, these practices should be banned. But normally, the judges scores should be OK, since there are 5 or 6 jury members for each country. Maybe there should be a different selection of the judges.
We had only televoting and we saw how it turned out, with mediocre or bad songs being high just because they had a big diaspora while countries with small disspora didn't have a chance at all, like debut of San Marino being last in semi, while being one of their best entries and overall a good song.
this is like the only year where this system would've been more tense, but I still prefer the current system, since 439 point landslides in the televote are supremely uncommon
if they got 12 from every country they would have had 468
2016 was tense too
Yeah I like this new system. You don't really know what to expect when the televoting points has started giving point to countries.
Nah the older system is more tense because any country could be called out at any time, but in the new system everyone sits back until it's their turn.
In this system we wouldn't be sure who will win to the last moment, because when I heard that Ukraine received more than 400 points it was obvious that they have just won, and watching Sweden, Spain, and UK receiving their points wasn't emotional at all
This system not better, because in the last moment you know that you definitely have more points than other 24 countries
@@АртемДовгаль-ф6л But we still wouldn't know if thay country has won. They could be in first by only 1 point difference while they didn't have many jury votes, or at least not enough jury votes. The suspense would be there until the last points were announced
For normal contests like 2019 or 2021 it makes the suspense last until the very last second, obviously no suspense was there for 2022, we’ve known it for 3 months and I don’t know why I even bothered hoping for Ukraine not to win because literally this year was just shitty (the contest was absolutely awesome, but the only fact that they won ruined it all)
@@thisbabyslays actually you can already know the final result, under every type of voting announce system, as soon as the second last country is announced, since there's a grand total of 116*n (n equals the number of countries voting) points to be assigned, you can just subtract all the points already assigned and see the final result
@@marcodamasio Yes but i'm not gonna do the math while watching the televotes. I'm too stressed at that point, i couldn't even put 2 & 2 together
This is the only year that this system would be more interesting. I surely prefer the one we use since 2019 though
I still prefer the way it's presenting here, it's more stressful imo
The fact that Moldova is higher in televote then Spain … gold! 😂
Lmao imagine 💀
Spain song was uhh FIREEEEEEE 🔥🔥❤🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥❤❤🇪🇸
Even Serbia was close to Spain with televote. I think there was like 3 point difference.
@@aleksaranitovic You do not take into account the fact that Serbia receives the maximum points from their neighbors, plus the diaspora of Serbia and Moldova/Romania
I loooooved that hahahaha
@@dabrat4149 almost everyone have neighboring countries, the fact is that In Corpore Sano was smash hit on Balkans and through out Europe. But in the end you're also wrong, cause Serbia didn't receive points from only 2 countries in televote.
Lithuania was so underrated by the juries like how are y’all about to give Sentimentai 35 points?
Cos it was terrible imo
Old system is more interesting in this year
BITI ZDRAVA💪🏼
Thank for video, that's interesting ;)
This old system will be way emotional this year.
Switch Azerbaijan, Belgium and Switzerland’s jury points with Lithuania, Estonia and Poland’s jury points and I actually would’ve been kinda satisfied with the jury vote
You ought to start counting votes with the country with the lowest jury total score, and work your way upwards.
I believe this system to be better somehow. The one that is now is just utter chaos; you have NO idea what the placements for the televote are.
exactly, like Norway in 2019 got no recognition as a televote winner
You don't need to know, really
Pretty sure that's why many people prefer the new system tbh 😂
Bring this voting announcement back!!
I like the new system way better especually for other years
I wonder what the results would have been using the even older system, pre 2016 where the jury and tele votes weren't separate
I agree, I didn't like the voting system before 2016.
@@manujelly3156 Same, I like that we can see the jury and public separate
@Aela Ooh, well done! That's interesting, no drastic changes then in regards to the top 5 😅 I wondered if it would have been very different. Thanks for working out and sharing 🙂
scores are given from low to high
Azerbaijan got very few points
Me waiting for this year’s version of this
Cooming soon...
@@escvalerio 💖💖💖
Who program you use
With 0 points, it is Switzerland.
LOVE ❤ TIRANA
how do u make this animations?
PowerPoint - morphing transition
@@escvalerio ok, thanks
Sweden compared to Ukraine, was 1 point closer.
They just wanted to Hold them Closer
how did u make this?
PowerPoint
With 6 points, it is Germany.
A l b a n i a ❤ TITAN
I'm in love with Sam Ryder. He had to win! ❤❤❤
With 0 points, it is Switzerland.
With 2 points, it is Australia.
With 3 points, it is Azerbaijan.
With 5 points, it is Czech Republic.
With the same amount of 5 points, it is Belgium.
With 6 points, it is Germany.
With 8 points, it is France.
With 10 points, it is Iceland.
With 21 points, it is Armenia.
With 26 points, it is Finland.
With 36 points, it is Portugal.
With 42 points, it is The Netherlands.
With 53 points, it is Romania.
With 57 points, it is Greece.
With 93 points, it is Lithuania.
The most unfair victory in the history of the competition
How
I agree
Nah
Moldova killing the televote reminds me of Poland in 2016...
Wait? What is the difference in the system? I thought they only changed it once...
Its system been 2016-2018. Now TV points said from last jury place to first. But 2016-2018 said from last tv place to first
@@hiteen7004 Ooohh thank you! I understand now!
But wait .. I would say hat that would hardly make a difference..?
@@C-handle-r More intrigue because when bottom jury country gey 200+ ponits, for example, Moldova or Norway 2019. We don't know Have country who get more or no.
You must be very young to call this "old system"
ukraine was obviously vote because of you know why
Tutorial
Bring the old system back please. So tired of corrupt and biased jury.
Back to corrupt televoting alone, say hello to 12 points from all neighbouring countries. No. I'm from Belgium, and we were continuously screwed, because we didn't have to expect 10 or 12 points from France, Germany or the Netherlands.
I think the mixed results from juries and televoting is the best.
One word... Diaspora! I really hate the televote, think that it has ruined the show.
Then we need some new rules for judge voting. It is more biased and corrupt than televoting. Some countries keep buying or negotiating on points.
@@artsrunkhangeldyan83 Of course, these practices should be banned. But normally, the judges scores should be OK, since there are 5 or 6 jury members for each country.
Maybe there should be a different selection of the judges.
We had only televoting and we saw how it turned out, with mediocre or bad songs being high just because they had a big diaspora while countries with small disspora didn't have a chance at all, like debut of San Marino being last in semi, while being one of their best entries and overall a good song.
I mean I prefer new sistem, as a Spanish, it would have been a double shot from UK surpassing with 7 points and then the pity win
This is probably the one year where getting rid of the televote altogether would've been more interesting.
this year was a joke
Eurovisión no thanks 🤮👎
Ofc, ucrein won because of their "good singers" and not external factors😂