You should end more episodes like this! I’m not smart and can’t remember a lot of details, so dumbed-down explanations of the pros and cons like you did here would help a lot.
Break up concentration of power with ballot initiative process in Albuquerque and other cities... Economic power at the top is concentration of power which becomes corrupt and causes distopian futures... ... Break up concentration of power and economics! I think UBI or UBD of 50% of GDP might work better for the inflation issues with big corporations.. Here is Canada hopefully get inspired. www.youtube.com/@UBIWorks/playlists
Ok just by the title alone I'm confused. I received tanf in the past. I was a very young single mother of 2. It was 2004. I was given $118 per month. I wasn't able to have any income or I'd lose my assistance. My child support was also taken away when it was actually paid by their father to pay back the tanf. This is how I had to live until my youngest daughter was a few months old and was able to get child care assistance. I know for me tanf was basically like a Payday advance. It wasn't a grant, it was definitely a loan. Again, this was Indiana 2004.
You were not allowed income because the government wanted you to be completely reliant on them for your financial future. This would make you much more likely to vote for a bigger government to continue assisting you. Interesting don't you think?
@@iggy5895 Such requirements are always added by Republicans, not by Democrats. Republicans like to break things so that they can say "see, it doesn't work".
$118 a month and no additional income? Any job at minimum wage job ($5.15 at the time) would have given you the same amount of money at 22 hours per week, 25 if you had to pay taxes in the 10% bracket. Simply working a 40 hour week would have benefited you more. Programs like this are only meant to tie you over for a few months as you find other work. It should not be used for 2 consecutive years as the video indicated one could. It should be like an advanced as it is not free money. You borrowed money from your statesmen in a time of need. It was available for you to stay afloat. You should pay it back. I don't see anything wrong with that.
@@radamh I wasn't able to work at the time. i would have come out in the red waiting for child care assistance. at the time i had 2 small children, daycare cost 75/week per child and there weren't many jobs i felt i could do that would work me during daycare hours. it's fine to require the money to be paid back, but A: state that up front and B: how is taking away my child support good for my family? a small wage garnishment would be more reasonable rather than just taking every last penny of the money intended to help me pay for my kids until the state is paid back. also something people don't know about tanf: i could only ever get support for the children i had at the time of my first application. people always talk about women making babies to keep that welfare coming in. idk about everywhere, but that doesn't happen here.
I enjoyed your presentation and wished to cite you in my coursework. However, I went to click on the transcripts, and it's in Portuguese! Nevertheless, Please keep up the great work and keep the people informed. Excellent job!
I'm curious if the work requirements finding on poverty goes both ways. That is to say if there's no difference to poverty level with and without work requirements, does that also mean not having the work requirements would not change the poverty level? So if the purpose of having hte program is to fight poverty, wouldn't that mean it's a failure on that front?
You wasn't the smartest one in your 15 years of High School was Ya, for those who aren't little Entitled bastard you start out at a low level and lean work your way up to a Better job, with working records and work history.
Friendly input: Fashion always changes, it's not a science. "Proper" is just a trumped up word for your taste or preference of this year. For the longest time it wasn't "proper" for women to wear pants and a "proper" tie was 5 inches wide, not to mention those ridiculous giant white wigs men in government had to wear because.... it was proper? You would benefit from allowing people to dress however they feel, though no harm in suggesting, "I think x would suit him better," if you can't help but comment.
Like any good business leader, when the funds begin to dwindle, instead of making more assistance available, they devise ways to reduce the cost to the program rather than the cause of the need in the first place. Put an idiot in charge of economic issues and watch our country slip further behind the rest of the developed world in quality of life.
They claim because I was getting the additional 300 bucks on top of my state unemployment of 468.00 before taxes that I get to much cash to get food stamps and my rent alone is 1229.00 monthly.what do I need to do boss Lady.
A lady I know. She was getting cash assistance in Maryland. For herself and 4 kids. I worked pretty much all my life. Somehow, she and her kids can go on vacation every year. They stay at nice motels. I don't get it. I was never able to afford to take my 4 sons on any kind of vacation. So, how does somebody do it that gets cash assistance?????
Because she lives at such a low income rate, her bills are probably way cheaper than yours so that’s how she could do this and remember all welfare is corporate welfare look at how much money the place you work at makes and how much money they pay you and then find out if you want to go to work in the morning are they paying you really what you’re worth are you an economic slavery? It sounds like to me that you are upset because you can’t figure out how to live like that woman. I’m just saying Hope God bless you and your endeavors.
Remember folks: graduate high school, get a full time job, and have responsible sex habits. These 3 tips alone could save so many people from poverty. Let's help them do so! Interesting vid HT, looking forward to the next one.
It's more like: graduate college with a computer science degree, get a full time job, and pay back about 50K USD in student loans. You won't have time for sex or children.
People who say "graduate high school, get a full-time job, and have responsible sex habits" are the very people who go out of their way to abolish /cut/reduce comprehensive sex education in public schools in the name of Jesus.
If people could work and earn sufficient income to live decently, they would. There is a very low percentage of grifters (most of them like Brett Favre, and not actually needy families). Have you seen the process to get people back to work??? It’s a f**king joke. Sending random listings for low- and no-skilled jobs to random recipients like the act of sending job listings does anything. And somebody is getting paid to do this. Meanwhile, if a company hires someone from this pool, they get paid, too. Want to see waste in public spending? Look at all the “qualifications” Republicans have enacted to prevent people from actually getting help. How much would we save, how much more good would we do if we just gave the needy the money and left out the obstacle course???
So the TANF work requirements decreased the number of people receiving welfare and increased the number of people working. How is that NOT a good thing? In other words, why should the goal of a welfare initiative be to KEEP people on it?
Keeping people on TANF is not the goal. The question is what the goal should be. Should it be simply reducing the number of people receiving it, or should it be to help those people get out of poverty so they can become productive members of society. Those two things are not equivalent, and simply barring people from receiving TANF (through structural barriers) does nothing to help people get out of poverty. I don't see how it's a win for anyone to have a large underclass of chronically poor people.
The people were still living in poverty. If you just shut down the entire TANF program less people would be on it, but that doesn't mean people are magically benefiting. More people working is good, but to some extent they may be taking worse jobs to make ends meet and they'll be prevented from pursuing an education or other opportunities that would both benefit them and make them a more productive member of society in the long run.
@@jpisello the single largest shift of poverty to sustainable wealth, in the entirety of history nonetheless, occurred during these past few decades when China and India got rid of all there stupid programs like these and just opened up the free market! That should be our goal in my humble opinion
@@jpisello There are no programs to cite and that's the point. The markets were set free/loosened up when India got out from under the thumb of British colonialism and China from communism, and subsequently an entire new middle class was born in just a few decades! It took us a couple of centuries to get there, mostly due to our revolution and civil wars, so I say bravo capitalism...
@@TheBighatter "A new law that allows Georgians to buy health insurance plans approved by other states was envisioned as free-market solution that would lower prices and increase choices."So far, the law has failed to produce results: Not a single insurer is offering a policy under the new law." No out-of-state insurers offer plans in Georgia Monday, April 30, 2012 Atlanta Journal-Constitution “Despite the often forceful arguments for and against across state lines proposals, there has been little opportunity to assess how they work in practice. To understand the impact of across state lines proposals on the availability of health insurance and the competitiveness of state health insurance markets, we analyzed legislation that has been enacted in six states-Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Rhode Island, Washington and Wyoming-to require, encourage or study the feasibility of allowing the sale of health insurance across state lines or the formation of interstate health insurance compacts… “The two states that have implemented across state lines laws, Georgia and Wyoming, reported similar challenges. No out-of- state insurers have entered either of these markets or indicated their intent to do so as a result of the states’ across state lines legislation. Maine officials reported that no out-of-state insurers have yet indicated their intent to enter the market under Maine’s new across state lines law..."Respondents universally reported the enormous difficulty that out-of-state insurers face in building a network of local providers, and insurers identified doing so as a significant barrier to market entry that far surpasses concerns about a state’s regulatory environment or benefit mandates." Selling Health Insurance Across State Lines: An Assessment of State Laws and Implications for Improving Choice and Affordability of Coverage Center on Health Insurance Reforms - Georgetown University October 2012
At the very least drug users should be disbarred, and We should not give assistance to people that can't get a loan from a bank or those that recently got laid off.
People often get fired for bullshit corporate reasons that have nothing to do with their job performance (downsizing, buy-out, whatever), why should we not help those people when their situation is not their fault?
I never said not to help them. "those that recently got laid off." is where we both agree. Besides, that. It should be treated as a privilege. No one should be forced to help others.
You wrote "We should not give assistance to people that can't get a loan from a bank or those that recently got laid off." Or shortened, "We should not give assistance to people ... that recently got laid off." So you'll have to excuse me for reading that and thinking you mean we shouldn't assist people who recently got laid off...
![Gunna - HIM ALL ALONG [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HiCxoDeo0hc/mqdefault.jpg)
You should end more episodes like this! I’m not smart and can’t remember a lot of details, so dumbed-down explanations of the pros and cons like you did here would help a lot.
Break up concentration of power with ballot initiative process in Albuquerque and other cities... Economic power at the top is concentration of power which becomes corrupt and causes distopian futures... ... Break up concentration of power and economics! I think UBI or UBD of 50% of GDP might work better for the inflation issues with big corporations.. Here is Canada hopefully get inspired. www.youtube.com/@UBIWorks/playlists
These are sooooo good. It's so hard to wait a week.
Are you having problems getting free legal aid text mr Williams on google hangout for assistance.. sm7919482@gmail.com
Very interesting results. The success is determined by what outcome was desired, which was probably a decrease in applicants.
Ok just by the title alone I'm confused. I received tanf in the past. I was a very young single mother of 2. It was 2004. I was given $118 per month. I wasn't able to have any income or I'd lose my assistance. My child support was also taken away when it was actually paid by their father to pay back the tanf. This is how I had to live until my youngest daughter was a few months old and was able to get child care assistance. I know for me tanf was basically like a Payday advance. It wasn't a grant, it was definitely a loan. Again, this was Indiana 2004.
You were not allowed income because the government wanted you to be completely reliant on them for your financial future. This would make you much more likely to vote for a bigger government to continue assisting you. Interesting don't you think?
@@iggy5895 Such requirements are always added by Republicans, not by Democrats. Republicans like to break things so that they can say "see, it doesn't work".
$118 a month and no additional income? Any job at minimum wage job ($5.15 at the time) would have given you the same amount of money at 22 hours per week, 25 if you had to pay taxes in the 10% bracket. Simply working a 40 hour week would have benefited you more. Programs like this are only meant to tie you over for a few months as you find other work. It should not be used for 2 consecutive years as the video indicated one could. It should be like an advanced as it is not free money. You borrowed money from your statesmen in a time of need. It was available for you to stay afloat. You should pay it back. I don't see anything wrong with that.
@@iggy5895 most of the people on the program don't or didn't at least vote at all.
@@radamh I wasn't able to work at the time. i would have come out in the red waiting for child care assistance. at the time i had 2 small children, daycare cost 75/week per child and there weren't many jobs i felt i could do that would work me during daycare hours. it's fine to require the money to be paid back, but A: state that up front and B: how is taking away my child support good for my family? a small wage garnishment would be more reasonable rather than just taking every last penny of the money intended to help me pay for my kids until the state is paid back.
also something people don't know about tanf: i could only ever get support for the children i had at the time of my first application. people always talk about women making babies to keep that welfare coming in. idk about everywhere, but that doesn't happen here.
Excellent. Am using it in social policy class. Thank you.
I enjoyed your presentation and wished to cite you in my coursework. However, I went to click on the transcripts, and it's in Portuguese! Nevertheless, Please keep up the great work and keep the people informed. Excellent job!
I'm curious if the work requirements finding on poverty goes both ways. That is to say if there's no difference to poverty level with and without work requirements, does that also mean not having the work requirements would not change the poverty level? So if the purpose of having hte program is to fight poverty, wouldn't that mean it's a failure on that front?
The purpose of TANF was never to reduce poverty. Using that as a metric would seem to be unfair.
www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title04/0401.htm
That's not what I got out of that. I thought he meant adding work requirements to TANF did not reduce poverty.
All four of those goals are poverty reduction goals dude. They target different periodicities though.
You wasn't the smartest one in your 15 years of High School was Ya, for those who aren't little Entitled bastard you start out at a low level and lean work your way up to a Better job, with working records and work history.
I already know I'm eligible but how do I apply? Can you apply online. I can't seem to find the application online. Or do I have to go in person
Can this cover accordingly clothing for the season
Friendly input: You would benefit from a narrower collar. Kudos on the proper knot collar ratio.
Friendly input: Fashion always changes, it's not a science. "Proper" is just a trumped up word for your taste or preference of this year. For the longest time it wasn't "proper" for women to wear pants and a "proper" tie was 5 inches wide, not to mention those ridiculous giant white wigs men in government had to wear because.... it was proper? You would benefit from allowing people to dress however they feel, though no harm in suggesting, "I think x would suit him better," if you can't help but comment.
Like any good business leader, when the funds begin to dwindle, instead of making more assistance available, they devise ways to reduce the cost to the program rather than the cause of the need in the first place. Put an idiot in charge of economic issues and watch our country slip further behind the rest of the developed world in quality of life.
How can i be helped
To get it
Hi I'm interested mom 3kids under 19 I have low income ,I can get benefits
They claim because I was getting the additional 300 bucks on top of my state unemployment of 468.00 before taxes that I get to much cash to get food stamps and my rent alone is 1229.00 monthly.what do I need to do boss Lady.
@Gift Glorious good afternoon.no i live here in dallas tx
@Gift Glorious ok kool beans im ho email her now
Do she help with back pay on rent as well
Nope
Intro music is super quiet again
A lady I know. She was getting cash assistance in Maryland. For herself and 4 kids. I worked pretty much all my life. Somehow, she and her kids can go on vacation every year. They stay at nice motels. I don't get it. I was never able to afford to take my 4 sons on any kind of vacation. So, how does somebody do it that gets cash assistance?????
Because she lives at such a low income rate, her bills are probably way cheaper than yours so that’s how she could do this and remember all welfare is corporate welfare look at how much money the place you work at makes and how much money they pay you and then find out if you want to go to work in the morning are they paying you really what you’re worth are you an economic slavery? It sounds like to me that you are upset because you can’t figure out how to live like that woman. I’m just saying Hope God bless you and your endeavors.
@@ericneering6357 I agree with you!
Get you still receive it if you have a part time job
Are you having problems getting free legal aid text mr Williams on google hangout for assistance.. sm7919482@gmail.com
Am asingle mother
How can I be helped
How bout can soups can meat
well explained
Are you having problems getting free legal aid text mr Williams on google hangout for assistance.. sm7919482@gmail.com
first!
Last
Remember folks: graduate high school, get a full time job, and have responsible sex habits. These 3 tips alone could save so many people from poverty. Let's help them do so! Interesting vid HT, looking forward to the next one.
@jfsfrnd I like how you imply that women should be sexually promiscuous and stupid!
It's more like: graduate college with a computer science degree, get a full time job, and pay back about 50K USD in student loans. You won't have time for sex or children.
People who say "graduate high school, get a full-time job, and have responsible sex habits" are the very people who go out of their way to abolish /cut/reduce comprehensive sex education in public schools in the name of Jesus.
@@SumuduVNagodavithana the only partner you need in your life is jesus :) (joking dont hate plz)
@@SumuduVNagodavithana "personal responsibility?! REEEEEE!!!!!"
If people could work and earn sufficient income to live decently, they would. There is a very low percentage of grifters (most of them like Brett Favre, and not actually needy families). Have you seen the process to get people back to work??? It’s a f**king joke. Sending random listings for low- and no-skilled jobs to random recipients like the act of sending job listings does anything. And somebody is getting paid to do this. Meanwhile, if a company hires someone from this pool, they get paid, too. Want to see waste in public spending? Look at all the “qualifications” Republicans have enacted to prevent people from actually getting help. How much would we save, how much more good would we do if we just gave the needy the money and left out the obstacle course???
🙌🏾
So the TANF work requirements decreased the number of people receiving welfare and increased the number of people working. How is that NOT a good thing? In other words, why should the goal of a welfare initiative be to KEEP people on it?
Keeping people on TANF is not the goal. The question is what the goal should be. Should it be simply reducing the number of people receiving it, or should it be to help those people get out of poverty so they can become productive members of society. Those two things are not equivalent, and simply barring people from receiving TANF (through structural barriers) does nothing to help people get out of poverty. I don't see how it's a win for anyone to have a large underclass of chronically poor people.
The people were still living in poverty. If you just shut down the entire TANF program less people would be on it, but that doesn't mean people are magically benefiting. More people working is good, but to some extent they may be taking worse jobs to make ends meet and they'll be prevented from pursuing an education or other opportunities that would both benefit them and make them a more productive member of society in the long run.
@@jpisello the single largest shift of poverty to sustainable wealth, in the entirety of history nonetheless, occurred during these past few decades when China and India got rid of all there stupid programs like these and just opened up the free market! That should be our goal in my humble opinion
@@adambutsch2820 can you cite any studies to back up your assertions? I'm not aware of any such programs in China or India.
@@jpisello There are no programs to cite and that's the point. The markets were set free/loosened up when India got out from under the thumb of British colonialism and China from communism, and subsequently an entire new middle class was born in just a few decades! It took us a couple of centuries to get there, mostly due to our revolution and civil wars, so I say bravo capitalism...
Just do universal healthcare. Jesus christ.
Pass. Makes more sense to divorce health insurance from employment and allow multi-state pools.
@@TheBighatter been tried. Doesn't work.
@@steveh46 News to me. When, where?
@@TheBighatter "A new law that allows Georgians to buy health insurance plans approved by other states was envisioned as free-market solution that would lower prices and increase choices."So far, the law has failed to produce results: Not a single insurer is offering a policy under the new law."
No out-of-state insurers offer plans in Georgia
Monday, April 30, 2012
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
“Despite the often forceful arguments for and against across state lines proposals, there has been little opportunity to assess how they work in practice. To understand the impact of across state lines proposals on the availability of health insurance and the competitiveness of state health insurance markets, we analyzed legislation that has been enacted in six states-Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Rhode Island, Washington and Wyoming-to require, encourage or study the feasibility of allowing the sale of health insurance across state lines or the formation of interstate health insurance compacts…
“The two states that have implemented across state lines laws, Georgia and Wyoming, reported similar challenges. No out-of- state insurers have entered either of these markets or indicated their intent to do so as a result of the states’ across state lines legislation. Maine officials reported that no out-of-state insurers have yet indicated their intent to enter the market under Maine’s new across state lines law..."Respondents universally reported the enormous difficulty that out-of-state insurers face in building a network of local providers, and insurers identified doing so as a significant barrier to market entry that far surpasses concerns about a state’s regulatory environment or benefit mandates."
Selling Health Insurance Across State Lines: An Assessment of State Laws and Implications for Improving Choice and Affordability of Coverage
Center on Health Insurance Reforms - Georgetown University
October 2012
Scott Hendricks +
This app is fake
Holy hell, so it turns out that introducing work requirements means fewer people qualifying because....the people in this demographic DON'T all work!
At the very least drug users should be disbarred, and We should not give assistance to people that can't get a loan from a bank or those that recently got laid off.
People often get fired for bullshit corporate reasons that have nothing to do with their job performance (downsizing, buy-out, whatever), why should we not help those people when their situation is not their fault?
I never said not to help them. "those that recently got laid off." is where we both agree. Besides, that. It should be treated as a privilege. No one should be forced to help others.
@@FearlessP4P1 There must be a typo in your original comment then...
No, you just lack reading comprehension.
You wrote "We should not give assistance to people that can't get a loan from a bank or those that recently got laid off." Or shortened, "We should not give assistance to people ... that recently got laid off." So you'll have to excuse me for reading that and thinking you mean we shouldn't assist people who recently got laid off...