Singapore encourages you to exercise/learning/support in a different way, we got ActiveSG/Skillfuture credit/voucher given by gov. eg. when accessing the public sports facilities, the credit is likely sufficient in view of the fee already heavily subsidies.
Hi Mr Shiu, In the US, the MPF equivalent is called Social Security. Similar to other "Pay as you go" system which retiree can start to collect after the age of 62 at about 2/3 of the full amount. At age 67, you can collect the full amount. At 70, one can receive about 120%. The amount of money you would received is based on the contribution one made during one's working life.
Sing CPF model is very good, flexible and caring.👍👍 Whether it can be implemented in other countries depends on the ability and integrity of the government. Hong Kong?🤔🤔
Hi, mr.shiu. Singapore CPF is employor pay 17%, employee 20%.
新加坡是私人供20%，公司供17%
支持蕭若元！
excellent system for the oldmen...BRAVO !
错， employee 20% employers 17.5% depending on age.
美國當然有社保制度，雇主同雇員每月供款月薪6.2%，最高上限八千五百三十七美元一年，另外還有醫療保險1.45%，到退休年齡就可以每個月攞錢，越遲退休越攞得多
美國政府沒有供款, social security和medicare都是雇主和雇員的供款。
閣下的理論很奇怪，當銀行利息只有0.25%時，政府給予我們的公積金2.5% 至4%的利息竟然是「剝削」？淡馬錫賺錢竟然是錯？你以為每個基金公司都一定賺錢？
Singapore encourages you to exercise/learning/support in a different way, we got ActiveSG/Skillfuture credit/voucher given by gov. eg. when accessing the public sports facilities, the credit is likely sufficient in view of the fee already heavily subsidies.
新加坡起碼人人有樓住先,吾洗同D大媽爭,日日咁多大6新移民爭香港資源！
不用以新加坡政府比較香港的政府！
一邊係每幾年選一次自己的政府和總理！
另一邊係一千二百票和魚農票，點比較？
新加坡的選舉其實都唔值得羨慕
@@limlisa 新加坡係威權政府, 佢地打壓反對派都相當嚴重。
同埋新加坡政府一樣會玩規則, 令到反對派選唔到, 例如重劃選區。
不過情況不及香港嚴重
@@qlwhbks 求教，然則那些國家的選舉是最完美的呢？ 可否列舉數例子及其原因？！
也請解釋新加坡的選舉如何不濟呢？
@@qlwhbks 美國數個月後也會重畫選區，有利的政黨這两百年來也不是利用重畫選區而增強自己政黨的利益嗎？
請問世界上那個國家的政黨會刻意劃一個傷害自己利益的選區，煩請舉一些國家是反其道而行的？
@@qlwhbks 麻煩指教這幾年新加坡政府如何具體地「打壓」反對派？(不要舉五十年前恐共年代的例子)
我也想支持反對派呀，但，他們真係可以預備執政嗎？新加坡反對派正如香港的犯民一般不濟！唉！
謝謝分享😃
Thanks for your support
香港以前税制簡單,福利也粗疏,但麥理浩時代後,政府推廣公屋、免费教育、免费醫療政策等社會基本需求,照顧了大部份市民,加上經濟起飛,部份自顧的,政府可能有心放過,不用報税,多勞多得,由小康至小富.但近年簡單複雜化,各種細碎福利,唔湯唔水.其實而家社會進步咗,教育水平高咗,加上電腦化,可實行全民報税,有D福利係基於入息水平,是比較公平的.如65歲後,每月最小入息水平為5仟元,政府會補貼那此收入不夠5仟元的重5仟元,當然收入係任何收入,如退休金、租金、股息……等,其他如生果金等零碎福利则可免了.公屋雖然照顧了大部份人,但對夾心階層不公．應給自住私人樓的人,供樓利息對冲入息税,咁也可以减少很多怨氣,幫人上車.
Hi Mr Shiu, In the US, the MPF equivalent is called Social Security. Similar to other "Pay as you go" system which retiree can start to collect after the age of 62 at about 2/3 of the full amount. At age 67, you can collect the full amount. At 70, one can receive about 120%. The amount of money you would received is based on the contribution one made during one's working life.
so are north Europe happiest high tax gov organise people money counties, can be far better?
Sing CPF model is very good, flexible and caring.👍👍 Whether it can be implemented in other countries depends on the ability and integrity of the government. Hong Kong?🤔🤔
多謝分析！
美國有中央制度呀⋯⋯就是Federal 收的Social Security Tax。Employer 7.5%, Employee 7.5%，交Federal government. 將來退休之後，就可以領取 Social Securities Benefit。
谢谢分享。
支持SiuHK
赞成萧生
萧生你好，Singapore employee cpf contribute 20% every month, employer is 17% for those below 55 year old.
蕭先生, 大陸淘寶買唔到你本書...太好賣, 斷咗市...可能...
Support Mr Shiu
蕭生，現實係講就天花龍鳳做就寸步難行。
蕭生邏輯錯了。強積金本身當然有問題，我都支持回水，但政府幫你供幾個％，係普通香港人角度黎講當然賺左，因為稅收並唔係每個人都交一樣amount。蕭生二元分左「政府」同「民間」，其實係唔記得左呢類政策係想幫星斗市民，對有錢人黎講咩積金都係無用架啦。
一百億 每年攤分比香港市民 每人大約有一千蚊一年 不過香港醫療都將會冇負擔嘅 今日個個都小病變大病 大病變冇命呀
please forward to Police, open File, re:Public hospital Security systems, management systems
用cpf供小孩读书 他们日后是要还利息的 政府组屋也是一样 卖了之后也是要还利息的
蕭生仲會唔會講特朗普? 之前特朗普話會向支乸追討武肺一切賠償
其實都唔使講咁多啊
明眼人都已經知道根本有人圍內夾埋食香港人嘅錢
家庭醫生係專科醫生來
要有六年專科培訓
蕭生，在大陸怎麽買你的書？
馬來西亞的公積金同新加坡的相似
識諗就唔會做學者，教授啦。。。
畀呢面特區政府,似重播真腈玩周小林五其董生五元咗出三年應該作苦笑,净兩年前孟晚舟舜宇光學科技68元唔放今日156元
💪💪💪💪💪
說得對，但政府不做，我也不明白為何，無奈。
👍
蕭氏經濟學幾有創意，可以出書宏揚吓噃！
Butter
正傻hi
公积金系新加坡政府嘅猪仔钱罂
比中国好嘎啦～70 80 90 00都唔知点死