GodLogic Schools Mustafa Part 1 | Jesus is Good
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- @GodLogicApologetics vs Muslim Mustafa at UK
Jesus is Good
Original Video: • GodLogic SMASHES UK Da...
Please support the brother GodLogic as he makes his way towards full-time ministry!
#christian #muslim #debates #godlogic #apologetics #speakerscorner
How you can't win a debate with a muslim.
The Modern Muslim Rulebook for Debate
Rules are not same for both parties.
1-No question asked is for an answer. They only want you to accept it else your reply is of no use. So reply only if you agree to them.else your answers are of no use.
2-A muslim can use out of context verse but when you quote the same it's not accepted, and you should only accept their interpretation no matter what the book says.
3-They don't listen to what you are saying if you don't agree with them.
4-Bible is authentic only when it's useful for their reference.
5-When you talk about Qur'an you need go learn Arabic first, but they can teach you what in Hebrew and Aramaic should mean in your book.
6-They can ask for the early copies of Bible but you should not ask for the Qur'an copies from the time of Messenger.
7-Anything which doesn't suit their Idea of their faith then it's not acceptable.For example Qur'an never mentioned that Bible is corrupt.but they will reject it because it doesn't fit to their argument.
8-Finally when they ask questions they are very logical people but same logical questions you can't ask. For example Qur'an 14:4 says that every Prophet is sent for his language speaking people. Jesus is a prophet for the Israelites. Israelites speak Hebrew but Jesus spoke Aramaic. This is a contradiction to this verse because he is considered a prophet for the Jews...but you can't ask this question because you don't know Islam.
In other words, your response will be ignored unless it fits in with their narrative, which is always the Standard Islamic Narrative. They have no opinions or thoughts of their own.
Allhumdullah for the Grace of Islam..
Mustafa cooked this Anxious Avery. One of the best debates in terms of schooling.
Tnx u bro God logic continueos preaching d word of almighty God 4 Christianity God bless u always ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤'' '' ''
Love this I was watching this on a Muslim channel and it’s crazy
No logic.. The logic is crying in the corner.. For worshipping a human 😭😁😁😁😁
Like there was any way he would lose an argument to a man wearing a dress
Pastors wear similar clothes, do you make fun of them aswell?
This muslim thinks heez a proper rude boy debater. He aint bad, but aint as good as he thinks he is. As proved, again
Avery was disrespectful the whole deabate
Avery with the delusional lies again smh
What did he lie about? How do you expect Mustafa to know more than Avery when Avery has studied the Bible since he was a little boy, and Mustafa uses arguments from Jehovahs witnesses.
@@theelite5580 you want me to shatter your dreams? What if I told you that everything you were taught from a boy was a lie? If you listen to your God give heart you will know the difference
Of the twenty-seven writings that were added to the Jewish Scriptures by the Christians in antiquity as a “New Testament,” only seven are unanimously accepted by modern scholars as genuinely carrying the name of their original author. The seven are the following epistles of Paul: Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, and Philemon. The authenticity of several texts is disputed (especially Colossians, Ephesians, 2 Thessalonians, and 1 Peter). The rest of the writings contained in the New Testament were in all probability not written by the persons whose alleged authorship of these documents originally justified their inclusion in the canon.
The inauthenticity of these writings is of three different kinds. Some are instances of pseudepigraphy, that is, they were deliberately written under somebody else's name. This is, in the opinion of most scholars, the situation with the “deutero-Pauline” epistles: Colossians, Ephesians, 2 Thessalonians and the Pastoral Epistles. Also, 1 Peter is most likely pseudepigraphal, and 2 Peter certainly is. Other New Testament texts originally circulated anonymously and were only later ascribed to named authors. The four gospels and Acts belong to this category. The anonymous letter to the Hebrews was originally received as canonical on the assumption that it was written by Paul. A similar case is represented by the three letters ascribed to John. Finally, the Revelation of John and the letters of James and Jude may owe their canonical status rather to a mistake of identity: these documents may have been written by authors bearing the same names as the disciple and the two brothers of Jesus and later erroneously attributed to these apostolic figures
@@theelite5580 did Avery study the Bible as a lil boy?
@@theelite5580 thirteen letters of Ignatius of Antioch, six of them forged and the others falsely and severely interpolated. When we move deeper into the second century and on into the third and fourth, we see a heightened interest in the production of “apostolic” works - Gospels by Peter, Thomas, Philip, all forged; Paul’s letters to the Alexandrians and Laodiceans, forged; Jesus’ correspondence with Abgar, forged; Apocalypses of Peter and Paul, forged. We can move backward into writings forged in the names of the greats from antiquity, Isaiah or the Sybil, or forward into the writings forged in the names of orthodox church fathers - Basil, Augustine, Jerome. The list goes a very long way.
@@yaphotcham4083 Yes. Im pretty sure his father was a pastor