3 Reasons why I hate the Porsche Turbo S * Huracan Tecnica 1/4 Mile vs Turbo S
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2023
- We race my new Lamborghini Huracan Tecnica vs the Porsche Turbo S down the 1/4 Mile.
Stock Turbo S vs Huracan EVO: • New Turbo S vs EVO * P...
#lamborghini #tecnica #turbos 
Авто/Мото
What's the verdict? Was the Turbo S tuned? For reference, Stock Turbo S vs Huracan EVO Race: ruclips.net/video/JzV2ZA4WJZQ/видео.html
They run low-mid 10's stock so probably not. Good weather and track conditions? Lambo's are always slower than Ferrari, Mclaren and Porsche
Probably not, seems to be running the same as other Turbo S cars
looks like a mild tune on it....
No.
Stock I'd say.
Porsche's launch control is insane and paired with the PDK transmission makes it a tough opponent.
Plaid's launch and traction control are the best. No transmission and no shifting to slow it down ⚡️🇺🇸
And its got way more torque
@@larryc1616 A rocket car is better no traction control needed, since we comparing things with completly different engines and control systems.
So too the Lambo..BUT..that torque, that gobsmacking twin turbo torque, as the N/A V12 is revving and bulding up, the 911 Turbo is already there, i think this is the difference.That said I think Porsche well underquote power and torque, if they say 650hp, more like 700 or more, same goes for whatever torque figure is.
@@larryc1616 the two arent comparable fan boy
This race went exactly how it should. The Porsche is one of the most reliable and consistent cars there is for this type of race and its figures are well known and were even stated before the race started lol.
I’d still rather have the Lambo.
'Brooks' was just butthurt that the other dude wasn't mentally handicapped like some of the other people he races
Model S Plaid typing lol
Every video I've seen the Porsche is consistently running 10.2's.
reliable🤡
Personally think the gap would be higher if the turbo s was tuned
yep way higher, that one is stock
thanks captain obvious
Exactly 😂
Yea but what if the Lambo was tuned too?
@@thedumbconspirator4956 that’s definitely stock lol tuned this probably would’ve tied the turbo S
Three reasons why I love Porsches, beautiful ,fast ,reliable.
but the turbo s sounds awful with all these mufflers... I would take the lambo any time of the day, that v10 is better than any drag race results...
@@elcrackengaitos_bs4804yes the lambo still losses, lambo the brand itself isn’t a good car brand either, they aren’t reliable, don’t look good, to damn expensive and they are horrible on the roads
@@D1N0NUGGIE3 don't look good?
Every lambo looks better than your Prius blud + lambos are not horrible on the road
@@elcrackengaitos_bs4804 my bad, they are terrible I’m the roads ask any lambo owner how they are on the roads
3 reasons why i hate it, 1 it smokes everything, 2 smokes evrything and 3. Smokes literally everything
McLaren 720s doggy walks it
@@Smzxe dude the turbo s walks it in the quarter mile, can't beat awd of the line ,just not possible
maybe on CNN it does, but I have 3 cars in my garage that beat it easily....
@@chrism869 Lmfao 🤣 720s dog walked on Turbo S 10 times in a row on many different channels I can link 10 videos 720s even walked on Tuned turbo S
But Carwow used worst driver in worst condition wet track
Even 720s spider ran 10.1 @145 mph on Autocar channel that was on a dusty Runway
So 720s is clearly Faster
@@Smzxe carwow multiple races from the dig and the turbo s beat the 720s every single time, it's just rwd vs awd traction, you can try to get a good launch, but you'll never ever ever get even close to launching as good as awd, unless you're on a prepped strip and drag radials. What you mentioned, probably the turbo s got out front in the beginning cause of the awd ,and the 720s caught it at the end, you cant beat the launch on the turbo s ,and carwow did it on the dry,not in the wet
Porsche engineering is always impressive
There's no reason to suspect that the Turbo is tuned. Those times have been done on other channels on non prepped surfaces. But your technica is still gorgeous Brooks!!
Why is 60-130 better tho?
Awd and the trans are so quick. I have same color and speck. Im in Midwest its cold now and car is even quicker. 🍻
@alim7502 that small difference could be the prepped track, the car wow strip looks dusty.
Really could be better fuel?
@@bugpumper 60-130 being better does not have to do with prep when both cars are not slipping
Porsche HP are bigger than everyone else’s.😂
Yeah these things always punch above their weight it’s crazy
Well tell me how is a 650hp 1600kg car doing 60-130 in 7.2 secs while the 1520 kgs 640hp is doing 7.6 secs??
German hp*
@@alim7502
That is because of the 992 Turbo S' AWD and torque advantage. But do realize that a McLaren 600LT will beat the 992 Turbo S at higher speed acceleration...100 - 200 kph, for example? And the 600LT is older and has less hp.
@@alim7502 I’ve given up trying to work out why. For instance Why is my bone stock 1,900kg Smart electric car quicker than an Audi RS3 & BMW M2 at 0-60 & quarter mile ? It makes no sense. Duel motor AWD
428hp 543Nm 0-60 3.7 quarter mile 12.1 on tarmac.
Oh and at £43,450 it’s cheaper too.
Turbo, S is the only car that is ever given me a slight sensation of tunnel vision, where my ion at the periphery of my retina is turning black. And I’ve driven most of the Lamborghinis and I own a Corvette. But the turbo S is a different sensation.
Crazy, that Turbo S runs 10.2 on the strip and can run the same thing on the road! Just goes to show how good of a street/daily car it is
On road 10.3-10.4
Nothing in its class punches as hard as a 911 Turbo. Only way to beat it is way more power.
Exactly ! a thing that a lot of people forget when they are comparing a turbo with 1000hp cars like the plaid or the SF90
@@CLSTRN911 yes. People should try to beat a 911 Turbo in a car with comparable power.
Hint: they wont beat it. People comparing it to a Plaid are straight up idiots. We can compare a Plaid to a Rimac too
All the Teslasimps in the comments are just too funny.
@@Teslapromo103 No they're not. The plaid only has 10% more power to weight ratio and destroys the Turbo S by a whole second.
(I've also seen it beat a 800- 900 hp Turbo S despite a power too weight disadvantage)
Also, the Plaid is a 90,000-130,000 sedan, the 911 is a 180,000+ supercar, while the Rimac is a 2,000,000 Hypercar with about double the Plaid's power to weight ratio, so clearly it makes more sense to compare the Plaid with the Turbo S.
@@cubozoan9448 Lol i don't know where your numbers come from, but Plaid puts almost 1080whp down, so no, its not 'just' 10% better. Plaid also has instant torque and better aerodynamics. Tons of advantages to beat a 911 Turbo in a straight line.
A 800hp Turbo S still has a worse power to ratio than a Plaid and is only half a carlength behind it. So, nice try, but the 911 performs better for what it is. Especially for being Ice, coming from a Teslaowner.
You can quite literally hear the Turbo S get into its power sooner than the Tecnica. You'll need a much longer strip for the Tecnica's top end to make a difference.
Even at a half mile the Porsche would win since it’s so far ahead at the quarter mile. A mile race might bring them even.
@@briankearn6991No Lambo makes less hp
@@sjhudon386 dont matter, aero also comes into play
Porsche has better top end, it does weight less tho
For rear wheel drive, the Tecnica is very fast. Top end run, the Tecnica will be faster. My friend and I did a test, in his 992 turbo, and my Tecnica. Very competitive .
My factory 992 Turbo S does 10.1 all day! I did literally 6 of them in a row.
Porsches consistency is amazing
Put it on the dyno, if you dare.... No way it runs 10.1 seconds with only 650 horsepower (550 whp since it is AWD and has increased drivetrain losses). The Turbo S 992 is definitely making more power than claimed to output.
@@Seventh7ArtLol so what. Most turbo cars have more hp thsn advertised
@@Seventh7Artalready done - ~670hp at the crank for a turbo s
@@Seventh7Art Hey brother, Porsche, as with many manufacturers, underrate HP. Porsche are known to release figures based on worse case scenario (averages). Many other manufacturers often release best case scenario figures. That factory rated 640hp and/or 1/4 mile & 0-60 times was more than likely what they noted while testing in the heat of South Africa.
Note, the Turbo S in this video was cutting ~1.48 '60 times...track surface was really good and thus it was not short shifting into 2nd and/or killing his '330. That same car on that day and track with a tune and exhaust would have ran 9.50's. Ask me how I know😊 😊
That ain't bs that's the truth
On Carwow the Turbo S does 10.1-10.3 on unprepped surface, so no i dont think that he tuned his Porsche.
exactly!
Fake numbers lol
yo, that 992 Turbo S is stock, the 992 turbo you ran against the evo was running super slow, stock 992s run 10.1/10.0@133+ and lightweight pack runs 9.9@135+
🤡
@@cleverusernamecl5532 🤡
It wasn’t running slow, those times you quoted were pretty much ideal conditions. Car and driver tested them at those times with a 4mph higher trap speed for both.
So while it’s possible, you can’t expect ideal every time, even if the cars are extremely consistent and can manage to set those times. Just the way the world works
no bro, I meant the times on the other video, when it was runnin slow, check on the link he put@@PapiAndrey
in that one video it was runnin much lower@@PapiAndrey
Porsche's launch are getting better every time u launch it
That Turbo S is a beast, and it would be happy to do this all day without hiccups!😅
The Turbo S is the best all rounder
Bro just keeps on hating Porsches for no reason lmao
In the looks department they're boring.
@@brownro214looks are deceiving my friend
@@brownro214said no one ever. Americans are just salty they need like 400hp more to beat a 911.
@@artansadiki3244I’ve seen a boat hellcat gap one with 2 bolt ons 🤣
@@johncena-hq1ti Yeah probably had 1000hp to keep up with a stock 650 911 as usual 🤣
I imagine our friends in Stuttgart will have a cheeky smile at this but all credit Brooks for giving it all you could. Great to see you back racing !
The Turbo S has, is, and will always be the standard.
The car you will hate even more is the 992.2 Turbo S E Hybrid which will do 9.6 quarter miles.
No it won’t. It’ll be too heavy. Won’t be any faster than a non-hybrid Turbo S.
Yeah it's not gonna eclipse the plaid
@thedumbconspirator4956 electric cars who cares
@@MrJohndoe996 no it will be faster. Porsche said that the hybrid system will be there only for the performance
@@MrJohndoe996it will. It won’t be a plug in hybrid, just a mild hybrid to boost performance
Glad to see you back on the drag strip, and I'm digging the new camera work and sound mixing!
The current Turbo S is my favorite production car available! The Turbo S's stock exhaust is anemic. The Plaid is a quicker and straight-line bargain.
200,000 isn’t a bargain and it isn’t faster in top speed than most porsches
The Plaid is under $100k, where are you getting $200k? And top speed is kind of a silly comparison. No one is ever topping any of these cars out.
@@ericship8383$89k=200k? Weird
What are you 12? No one gives a shit about top speed.
@@ericship8383 sure it is. Plaid tops out at what 200? 205? 217? Porsche 911 hovers right around the 200 mph marker as well with 718, cayenne, Macan taycan all being slower...
Not that it matters because that plaid is leaving the Porsche up until maybe 190 mph, and you're never going 190 unless ur on the autobahn
I still like the lambo more
10.5 or anything just under 11 is fast enough. I'd be happy with the Lamborghini.
Same here. You can't ignore the sound experience from a NA v10. But, would choose 992 gt3 rs for the same money if available at its sticker price.
Carwow has hit 10.1-10.2 with the Turbo S pretty much everyone time they run one on an un prepped surface
The Turbo S is definitely stock and would also beat an AWD Huracan Performante.
That’s…debatable, I believe there’s a video on Carwow they have a video of the turbo s vs Performante and the Perf won…
When both cars are that fast it only comes down to looks and sound, one clear winner here.
Turbo S wasn’t tuned, seemed like everyone on here knew you where gonna get smacked except you 😂
Great races and Great video, Brooks! Love the extra little clips you put in there too!
Your going to hate the turbo s more when the hybrid BEAST comes!
My first automatic thought of a reason you hate the turbo s is because no matter what you buy, the turbo s will be faster lol
Until I bring my Plaid. 😎
@TheMadmax0609 Brooks has a Plaid. Notice how he didn't mention it? Because no one cares lol
@@MrJsevo29 Oh EVERYONE cares... They just can't keep up. 🤣🤣
His SF90 is way faster
@@TheMadmax0609 🤡🤡🤡
this is the 3 REASONS WHY I LOVE THE TURBO S!!
I love the turbo s and I had one, I just wish they didn't sound like a vacuum cleaner.
Ja, der Klang des turbo s ist viel zu leise
Wow, that was amazing footage! Great races and super consistent times with the Lambo! But that Porsche seriously blast!
I'm more impressed on how well a RWD Tecnica did against a AWD Turbo S.
Counter any Turbo S by asking them to rev there engine. Sounds like absolute trash
Curious as to why people always bring up sound when the objective is about winning races ? Yes, it sounds like trash, but what ice vehicle in its class is beating it straight out of the dealership?
And a 5k exhaust can fix it 😂
The edit on this one Brooks is awesome man!
Good vid. Like the B roll when introducing the car specs.
If the Porsche was tuned the Tecnica wouldn’t even stand a place in the race
3 losses...yea, that might do it.
Turbo S mph is stock, not tuned.
Great content.
That 992 Turbo S is simply stunning 0:28, the Gentian Blue Metallic colour suits it perfectly - what a beast and it sounds monstrous too!
God that Turbo S spec is gorgeous and running 10.1 stock.....wow.
still would have a tecnica over a turbo S anyday personally. that V10 is golden.
Me too
Hallo. Ich bin Deutscher, und wohne in Stuttgart. Aber ich würde auch den Hurracan nehmen, ich liebe v10 Sauger Klang
A roll race @ 50 would’ve been interesting.
Nice to see the car you are racing against cutting just as good a light as you always do - doesn't happen very often
Brooks, Tecnica vs Pista vs Svj !!! It will be close...
Dragtimes Awesome Video I think it's awesome that 992 911 Turbo S's are that Fast from factory and I can't wait to see some more Huracan Technica Racing action
I‘d still rather have the lambo any day of the week! Just looks and sounds better and has that wow exotic factor. Great video 💯
Facts .. honestly me also I wouldn't care that a car beats Me by like half a second in the 1/4 me the Lamborghini with the color and sound is so breathtaking
@willzuehlke37 The problem I have with your statement is Lambo's are suppose to be competitive fast. Are we now gonna just let that slip and accept "well, I like the looks and sound, who cares its not fast enough?"
Lamborghini has fallen way behind in the speed department. They're years past due to fix that.
@@ronin7645 Dude no they aren't..... They have never ever been about pure speed and performance, which is why they have NA engines. They are about amazing sound, looks, and drama, which is what they give you
@@markoon139 Yes and no. You can't tell me Lambo's isn't about speed. Of course their brand is about looks, and sound. But that's not it. It has to be fast as well. They definitely have fallen behind the speed category compared to its competition. Porsche and Ferrari has easily passed them in speed. Even the Vette has caught up with them.
@@ronin7645 yeah, so?
Sounds like you need a Turbo S :) we all know Porsches are underrated
2:43 - where i spat out my star bucks.
I loved your line “I don’t know what to do, other than red light, just a piss him off…” 🤣
If you can't beat them, join them!
Because it smokes everything lol ?
720s?
You said they run low 10's and your correct. Why are you surprised?
It’s crazy how the 992 Turbo S was announced over 3 years ago. I remember watching the announcement vid, back in a college lecture, right before Covid lockdown.
The editing in the first race was hilarious
That 6.44 1/8th is bonkers. Such a beautiful machine, in Gentian Blue too
Everyone knows, Porsche and WV group underestimates their HP ratings.
Americans hate Porsches so much because they cant catch them after so many decades lol. If they beat a 911 in straights in a cat with way much hp, the 911 beats you on tracks. Totally normal behaviour, frustration because someone just does it way better.
Exactly....
Can’t wait to see the Lambo run against the C8 Corvette Z06. If the Vette has a tire it will be a great race.
C8Z06 has a great launch and 0-60 but just not enough to keep it going, it's trap speed is on the lower side but its ET is pretty quick. Should be pretty close. Love the new Z06's btw.
Both cars are pretty neck n neck but the huracan being around 250lbs lighter edges out the c8 z. According to reviewers though both cars trap around the same, mid 10s, low 130s
Great races , great numbers for both. Don’t be upset Brooks , some cars are just faster than others. Like my old 2008 I bought brand new and bone stock Lexus IS F that you thought was the quickest stock ever … I ran 12.5 at over 117 mph and the thing was a beast.
Had the pleasure of driving a 992 Turbo S and Taycan Turbo S at Porsche Experience in ATL. Amazing performance cars. Launch control is insane!
10.5 for the Technica is awesome!! Amazing! Great job, Brooks!
Not really, an Evo does the same
@@blazesmooth5573 of course it would it is AWD: I expected for the Technica to be slower that the EVO.
@@timmietz If that's the case the STO does the same 10.5
@@blazesmooth5573 yes, ie believe it does.
Dang that turbo is insane
technically, the Lamborghini lost😘
We ve known for years 911Turbo s is the nest nag for the buck all around sports car.
Your Lambo is beautiful but the Turbo S is business 😂
Awesome video! Legit question though, why do you wear a helmet in some clips and not in others?
Yeah, I own both and the big P is just at another level, performance wise. The big P is a bit boring in its own way because it’s just about perfect. No drama! If it wasn’t for my aftermarket exhaust on my big P, it would truly be super boring. I enjoy it because it just blends in. The Lamborghini is just nucking futz😂. The sound - oh what glorious music! I love em both but for different reasons…
You should post videos of both cars. I think us plebians on here would love to see some content if you own both.
Congrats on the 1/2 million subz!!!
Thank you!
“The engineers at Porsche had one goal…”
Brooks, organize Pista coupe vs Svj coupe (with the same oil and stock tires and with no pipes), please !!!
The wide angle lens you're using makes the cars look like Power Wheels.
I love the Huracan but Lambo really need to step up with the engines. A NA is from 2 generations ago (then Turbo then Hybrid). Basically the Huracan has had 640 hp for the past 10 years.
Who cares! It is not about quarter mile time look at Ferrari it killed the brand with its stupid turbos ! Put a turbo on a honda civic it will be faster only immature people care about how quick the car is
AWD and twin turbo torque tells the story here! 👍
I get how the turbo s got out front to 330 or 1/8, but shocking to see it still pulling slightly on the back 1/8. It has to be modded or is underated on hp. Maybe its more like 700? Maybe its just that the turbo S shifts are quicker - just enough to carry it through the gears to a gap.
Traction+torque+PDK is the difference I think.
The Lambo is probably down a bit on torque off the line. Hard to compete with a good turbo car.
mine is tuned and runs a 9.6. ran 10 flat when it was stock in the perfect conditions. it could run 10.1 and 10.2 all day long bone stock
They don't call the Turbo S an Exotic car killer for nothing.
Best performing Turbo S I’ve seen in person if it really is stock! Out launched my Plaid on the same day at the same track; 1.48 60 foot stock 👌
The “blue Uranus” gets me every time 💀😂
Man, I love the color of that Porsche
The S seemed to keep on pulling so something appears a bit out of sync compared with EVO vs the S.
10.5 rwd is awsome saying the awd perf did 10.3...porsche awd and turbo torque is inevetable. Good effort for the technica. Also notice how short the gearing is in the turbo-s.
Did 10.45 later that day in the Tecnica
@@DragTimesstill trash
Vw group rules!
And the the fact that the Stuttgart beast is primarily designed for lap times at the ring!
as always, porsche is king
720s is quicker. Drag times ran 9.7 with a stock mclaren 720s turbo s only did 10.09, slower than mclaren, slower than Tesla
@@N0neofyourbusiness.720s is 100k more expensive and of ur in a normal road it will never d0 10.3
@@N0neofyourbusiness.Should be quicker since it has more hp and less weight. Weird comparsion
I feel like the 911 turbo s got like a secret mild update because I saw motor trend tested one and got 2.3 and 10.3@132 then got another at 2.2 and 10.0@137 which is insane
That Porsche driver ain’t no slouch, He really knows how to launch his car.. ❤❤❤❤
They both got faster after each run! That 911 Is NEXT level ish!!🤔💪💪
Porsche is underrated just a bit and its just hard to overcome the 160lb ft pf torque difference
Turbo S is just different gravy man
Turbo seems stock to be fair
love that moment :)
Yessss!! A return to the drag strip!
Turbo s doing normal Porsche things
Any plans to twin turbo the huracan?
Turbo S can do 10.3s on unprepared track all day so i am pretty sure it was stock. It can also do 100-200 kmh in 5.9s. Watch carwow or AutotopNL and you will see.