"What we have here is a potential space drive," Laithwaite said. "Properly developed, this would take you to the outer universe on a spoonful of uranium."
The entire thing is supposed to run on only one engine, there is no reason to have two engines. When the device spins on it's axis it could run the spinning wheels on the outside of the bell by positioning cogs against a stationary cog that spins a transmission. The entire thing spins against one engine that is attached to a vehicle or other object you wish to lift. Also, there needs to be 13 weighted wheels, not two. Two is not enough to produce enough lift for anything. Also, the weighted wheels need to be positioned within a bell so that the outside is smooth, this virtually eliminates wind drag. It still isn't an anti gravity machine though, it is a good step forward but this device isn't going to do what you want. The reason 13 is needed is because it will cause a disturbance in the balance of the two opposing forces, which at high speeds will cause lift to occur. It is balanced enough to be stable but the tiny variations in balance will produce lift.
Almost borders on a Python sketch... ...she ran off with the Milkman, and he was abducted by aliens. Bless... wonder if he ever found out that we've had working anti gravity tech since the 1930's?
One of the greatest Rube Goldberg machine's ever made. "I did all this while working with only a very basic grasp of mathematics and physics". Should have put that quote at the beginning of the video. He's got some good mechanical ingenuity, but definitely no understanding of physics.
Many years I spent building my very own anti-gravity machine. Experiment after experiment. Failed test after test and then finally, I had it; my very own Anti-Gravity device. After the initial launch, all my notes on board, it all went wrong. It worked for sure, but the last I saw of it, it was flying past Pluto.
This is the traditional woman we (some) traditional men still look for in 2023.... That believes in us and it's comprehensive and understanding. And still takes us a sandwich to our garage
It's kind of sad how many people have a slight grasp of physics and extrapolate that into some nonsensical anti-gravity gadget that almost works, but never quite. It's like they would save themselves a lot of frustration if they just took a couple semesters of science classes at a community college.
It's funny to hear scottish accent - I didn't guess it's scottish until I checked where Dundee town is. It's a little similar to polish accent - hard "r" - so maybe Poles living in Scotland don't have to exercise english accent:) Anyway - was this device tested or checked if it really works ? I watched so many anti-grav engines and vehicles - that sky would be filled by copies of these devices..
Hahaha had to much time in prison well he just said fuck it ill go buy an Orange jumpsuit and lets see if i can get my mojo back tada!! Tesla would be like finally someone that doesn't give a fuck what they think about him!! I think he's got a good plug that bings him some uncut breaking bad juice! Keep up the tweekkng ya killin it
hahahah - thats funny. I used to live a few doors down from Sean in London. One day I went out in a Tux and he passed me in the street in a scruffy tracksuit. Sort of irony.
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on RUclips and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
If 1 man in his garage can make this with no money over 4 years, imagine what an unlimited black project budget and a team of top scientific minds can do.
But that team should be creative just like him. Having knowledge is different from having curiosity and idea For such things we need to think out of the box. The right thought should strike our mind just at the right moment.
And people wonder where UFOs USOs. originate brom. Isn't it obvious? WE made them. they're OURS. now...let that sink in. ready? Okay now ask this question. why? just why? think about all of the secrecy in private agencies. alien abductions. attle mutilations. YOUR OWN YOUR PEOPLE ARE ***KING WITH YOU! your just sheep. now. ack to sleep little sheeple. this is all a ream >:)
Other Half to enslave us to oil and basic electricity we could of left to other planets, maybe we have, maybe there is slavery on mars, while there is a genocide on the Middle East. Who knows how far this thing goes and where it leads
@@rodneyharris9681 It's funny how Star Trek, sexualized the poor Enterprises ship. She has been mangled by different species, space wars, planetary gravity, time travel chasing the Borg, and it's own internal warp-drive, which acts like a giant dildo, ripping her inner coil and preventing her from taking any more. I always thought that the Captain got off on this. Lol
Not if he was basing his calculations on Einstein's restrictive laws, which obviously one day will be broken or surpassed by better laws and theories, as have those of other famous scientists. What would have helped is having access to the antigravity and flying machine patents designed by Nikolai Tesla, but the majority of those are still locked away. Modern science is held back by those too scared to disagree with Einstein and also by greed, as all the ingenious and new inventions are bought and paid for by the wealthy oil and electric companies, to prevent them being manufactured and ruining their profits.
I like the polite professor, he knows perfectly well the machine will never work but doesn't spoil it for him and encourages him to try to improve the machine until he realizes too...
It’s really sad that people like this trick themselves into thinking they have some thing when they don’t. He even tricked his family and wasted his entire life for nothing.
I get your point but it's not wasted if he had fun and the illusion of working on a breakthrough project elevated his subjective life quality to a higher level.
Very sad to see someone so blind to the spirit of exploration and discovery. We don't find anything new by doing things we already know work. What you're advocating for is stasis.
One of my strongest memories as a teenager was seeing this exact machine demonstrated on the old Nation Wide show, and I have been obsessed with toying with similar ideas involving the hidden forces of gyroscopes ever since. I can't believe I have found this again after so many decades. Thank you for posting!
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on RUclips and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
6:25 Prof. Laithwaite could have performed a very easy test by simply standing on a scale with the disk spinning and not spinning. There is no difference in weight. He just did not understand the physics of a gyroscope which are admittedly not quite simple.
@TQ jokes on you buddy, the Flux capacitor was a hoax! Besides, everyone knows you need a minimum of 4 food processors eating a full bundle of banana peels EACH to reach anywhere near 1.21 gigawatts!
of COURSE you have a Punisher avatar 😂 dude can't get laid and he blames it's the way women are today and not the bald acorn he's got between his legs gtfoohwts 😂
The guy could’ve saved 10 years of his life by just putting a propeller on the model airplane engine and would’ve generated more lift then his entire machine in less than five minutes
Hello Phil violin maker! Retired professional violinist/violist here. I think you just might be right! Truly mind boggling isn't it? I feel sorry for his poor wife. She's a widow/divorcee without a death or court ruling to show for it. If she's still alive these forty years on, she'll be left a friendless pauper if he predeceases her. It's pretty evident at this point that it all came to naught.
Your pretty close gyroscope, the gyroscope uses a fulcrum and the arm of the gyroscope once spun presents lift. So imagine a wheel with in a wheel or more once spun presents lift as with the demonstration with the barbell. Once the barbell disc spun and the man becomes the fulcrum the barbell disc became weightless. A wheel with in a wheel activated by an engine creates anti gravity. Except the multi giro mechanism is much larger big time.
@@jojolafrite90 I pray to God Almighty that He reveals the secrets of flight and anti gravity, to His/God's Elect One's. I pray He saves that adventure for us, away from you hypocritical mockers. This govt sold itself out to fallen entities for the Knowles that we could of gotten for free from God. Obviously the helical pattern, is a pattern of the universe. And we can capture free energy if we work with nature instead of against it. And I pray that He casts down the fallen angels and their human followers and deceivers. Those in high places censoring and eliminating men who come across too much knowledge. I know they've found much more efficient ways to create flying craft using gyroscope effect and/or mercury vortex propulsion engines. The US govt has certainly studied the crap out of this and left us all in the dark. May God give us the victory, through our trials and tribulations. Not you nay saying mocking hypocrites who do nothing but attack a man's hopes and dreams. When all you are is a shadow. A shade of a man
@@Chompchompyerded o my goodness. The man is working out of his house... garage. His family still had access to him. His wife found a fake social life more important than discovering anti gravity. Which is exactly what he is cracking into. Women have made this whole life into a fake materialistic splurge to beautify themselves and compete with others over God's natural gifts and have the audacity to criticize a man seeking street greatness. Bet if he created anti gravity tech and became the world's richest man. You and almost every other woman would divorce their husband to get a piece of that pie. This world is PURE hypocrisy
Sir, I am now an old man and I have spent most of my life at similar pursuits. Nothing else mattered. I ate, slept and breathed the research of a particular device. Then came a point where I was just about broken and alone which forced me to peruse more lucrative endeavors. God bless you brother. Thank you for sharing. Sometimes inventing can be very lonely, not many people understand. Been there, done that. I wish you all the luck in the universe.
Sorry, you're completely wrong there. Gravity and inertia are completely different things. Inertia is the property by which mass/matter continues in its existing state when no force is acting upon it; whereas gravity is the (attractive) property that; (i) provides mass with the feature of weight; and (ii) warps space-time according to Einstein. Newtonian gravity is unusual in that it is the only force the pulls; rather than pushes - as is the case with all other modeled forces.
Now if you had said that gravity and acceleration were the same perhaps that may be the start of an intelligent discussion about Einstein’s TOR. Take care.
@XY ZW That is why I provided you with a (simpler) Newtonian version of gravity. As, I was quite sure that - since you were already mistaken about the science involved with the so called “Anti Gravity” video as well as being clueless about what inertia and gravity are - you probably would not know about (and/or reject) other more advanced theories (such as Einstein’s theories) that require a very good grasp of astrophysics and you to accept that you're wrong. Einstein’s theory about relativity/gravity - contrary to your claims that assert it has never been proven - was largely accepted/substantiated by several tests within the 1800 and/or 1900’s; including the test which verified the theories’ ability to accurately explain/predict the (previously insurmountable/problematic) precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion. In the mid to late 1800’s and also the early 1900’s Newton’s gravitational/other theories (particularly the Newtonian physics that dealt with 2 body systems) were unable to reliably/accurately explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion. Yet Einstein’s theory was able to resolve, what was ultimately, a shortfall in Newton’s gravitation/other theories - by way of accurately explaining/predicting the precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun. Clearly from the fact that Isaac Newton (and others) failed to get it right, accurately explaining/predicting the precession of Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun, was no simple task. You may be surprised to learn that the problem was not resolved by pretending magnetism and gravity were one and the same. The way Einstein solved the problem (to both his peer’s and also the scientific communities’ satisfaction) was (not by way of pretending magnetism equaled inertia, but) by way of applying his theory of general relativity. Please read the following slowly (and use a dictionary) so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . . . In Einstein’s theory of general relativity the precession of Mercury was modeled/represented and explained by; A) The spasmodic variance that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it periodically orbited around the Sun; within its own elliptical plane. B) Treating gravity as a curvature of space-time. In doing so Einstein revealed that, unlike Newtonian Physics, his general relativity provided a means within which to solve previously insurmountable and/or complex astrophysical problems, as well as; (i) accurately explain the observed precession that Mercury and/or its perihelion/aphelion exhibited; (ii) predict the future position of Mercury; (iii) accurately forecast the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as Mercury orbited around the Sun; and; (iv) highlight the deficiencies associated with (the widely accepted) Newtonian mechanics/physics. Given the acceptance of Newtonian mechanics at the time despite the fact that it clearly fell over when it came to explaining Mercury’s precession around the Sun and other scientific phenomena; the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, become instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate construct for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time. From there the fact that Einstein’s theory of general relativity was able to pass other tests and accurately reveal/predict; (i) how light behaved and/or deviated from a straight path/line (in ways that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) in the presence of a large mass; (ii) relativistic time delays in the propagation electromagnetic signals (that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) as a result of the electromagnetic signal path being close to a large mass and/or the Sun; and (iii) the precession of binary pulsars with only 4° arc per year of orbital shift in ways that, not only were consistent with the space-time curvatures Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicted for the binary pulsar’s precessions - but also, then went on to become the foundation for accurately calculating the masses of the 2 neutron stars constituting the binary pulsar. From there the discovery of gravitational lensing - predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity - further bolstered Einstein’s general relativity theory. As such, you are wrong about inertia, gravity, and how proven some of Einstein’s theories are. Furthermore, inertia and magnetism are not the same; so you're wrong there too. That said, if you were to provide *proof* that inertia and magnetism were - as you claim - supposedly same, then I would be happy to read (and/or laugh at) it. By proof, I mean your theory - that inertia and magnetism are one and the same - must be published within a respected scientific journal and be reviewed/accepted by experts in their field. Until that happens; A) Almost every deep space probe and/or GPS satellite that has been and/or currently is traversing around the earth and/or through our solar system and/or beyond; will still be utilizing aspects of Einstein’s TOR to ensure positional/other data and performance is accurate. B) Please take care and try to get some sleep.
@XY ZW You seem to have overlooked that (in addition to me previously advising that you ought read my previous post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand)I didn’t explicitly state that Einstein’s theory of general relativity served as *“proof”* for any of the theorem’s we were discussing. So, sorry to burst your little bubble there. You seem to have jumped to that conclusion all by yourself - which is a trait of bad science. Let’s try again; and this time, please read my post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . . Here is an excerpt from my previous post and note the word *construct* . . . Jim Stanley Post 27 April 2020; “the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, became instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate *construct* for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time”. As such, even your recent post’s comment . . . . . XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”. That (whilst pretending gravitational lensing has not been observed - whilst at the same time overlooking the other examples I provided that substantiate how/why Einstein’s theory of general relativity became a more accurate theory) appears to seek to discredit Einstein’s theory of general relativity insofar as it applies to the curvature of Spacetime constituting relativistic gravity; is questionable for various reasons including the following . . . . It may well be the case that (as you seem to say) the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of Mercury as you put it) does not in itself substantiate that, as you say, “space bends”. Furthermore, it may also be the case that (as you seem to say) that the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of mercury as you put it) is also disproof of Newton’s theory. But all of that actually fits with what I stated previously. As, previously I described the success of Einstein’s theory of general relativity within the context of (at least) disproving Newtonian mechanics and providing a better *construct*; which, really, is what your below and/or above-mentioned statement basically says, before it goes astray by way of pretending the win for Einstein’s theory of general relativity never occurred. XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”. Only a fool would argue that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (regardless of how reliable it may be) didn’t experience a win as a result of disproving the Newtonian theory of gravity and/or providing a better *construct* (Spacetime and the curvature of it) to explain the precession of Mercury’s perihelion. If you wish to discredit Einstein’s theories your time may be better spent on; A) Understanding his theories more comprehensively and within a historical context; rather than questionably presuming acceptance/success was not granted to Einstein for his theories of relativity, and that gravitational lensing was not a part of it. B) Mathematically examining Einstein’s use of pseudotensors to represent gravitational fields. So, at this stage, as far as I am concerned, it seems you're misinterpreting my posts (possibly) as a means to portray yourself as being correct; all whilst you're yet to substantiate that magnetism and gravity are the same. So, before I move ahead and deal with your other questionable allegations and oversights . . . . . If you would kindly substantiate prove that magnetism and gravity are the same (and/or reference the scientific papers that support this view) that would be nice; as it was with this claim that your opened your first response/post time mine.
@@StormCentre88 I feel your pain trying to explain this. I worked in energy-automation science/engineering and quite often I would see ridiculous experiments from someone having "thrown a physics textbook in a blender" and conjoined phrases and concepts in a manner that is incorrect. Sometimes I would explain to a friend that it wouldn't work and explain why. Even when I kept it simple and politely said that the energy input would exceed the energy output. Then I would get a pause and a blank look and they would say, " but this is something different". I gave up.
Mines would tell me I worthless when I was going thru tough financial time, made me feel like utter garbage. I picked myself up and moved on. Glad there good women who supports their husband
for most part of my life from age 5 to age 29 I been working alone on my designs until I got into college and my inventing process changed. For those inventors who keep pushing boundaries in the garage a gentle advice, a textbook or two of reading and thorough analysis will save a lot of time, money and anguish later on.
@@ishkibable The guy that spent 24 years living off his parents and inventing things in their garage is ambiguous, vague and provides few details. *Surprised face*
The problem with your advice is that almost everything you learn in your text books is either completely wrong or it teaches you limitations based on our currently accepted physics. People like Sandy dont need text books they would actually hinder his ingenuity. People like Sandy are directed by unseen forces on himself. In summary, your advice for especially gifted people is BULLOCKS!
@@suckOnThese3 you can use the books as stepping stones they usually have the fundamentals which are really important when putting the pieces of a puzzle together
Love this guy so much ambition and peace in him.. amazing wife loyal respectful and so accepting.. The women of today.. would have this guy done for domestic abuse..
Considering when this was recorded you should know that she had no other option than to accept it. Back then we could not let a flat, get a credit card, or open a checking or savings account, or buy a house without a man's signature. We also made only a fraction of the amount that men made for exactly the same work, and in addition we were limited to what kinds of work we could do. Most worst jobs were considered women's work. We are much better off now because if we did get stuck with a guy who decided to go lost pilot on us we can get out of the marriage, get good jobs (still paid a bit less than the boys), open financial accounts and live a fairly normal life afterward. It's a different world now than it was then.
What a great woman, and he gave it a fair shot, more power to him for trying! You can't screw up if you never try anything, but you'll never make anything good neither..
That navy video is of a distant heat signature like a jet exhaust. The shape you see in the video is hot air, and glare. The "turning" sideways is glare from the glass that's turning in front of the camera.
It happens to me too a lot of people when you become obsessed with something and you get so close to it from what you've imagined and put on paper and then when it comes to life it just becomes an obsession. And it is men and women like this who have changed our world look at Einstein he couldn't hold a relationship to save his life because they're obsessed the people who invented jet engines the internal combustion engine and so on these are all obsessions at one point now it's just a reality we take for granted
I have always believed there’s a way to manipulate gravity with magnets. Maybe if you have an enclosure with all the same polarities pushing against each other.
Magnet fields are just electric fields seen in a moving frame of reference, lots of youtube videos on it of physics PhDs. If you can't manipulate gravity with electric fields, you can't do it with magnetic fields.
This is my 3ed time watching this and it still amazes me. We r all into something we r driven to. U should be proud of yourself and your wife is someone very special.
Will be watching and learning all tonight! My cousin Jimmy Fraser used to talk about you all the time when he first come to Australia, jimmy and Jan and their kids Cameron and Leslie. Howdy you genius!
its a gamble, some ppl did the same thing and became billionaires, elon musk bil gates, steve jobs, steve vozniak to name a few, but many didn't have same luck
Did any of you ever wonder why I did not permit comments to be posted with respect to this item up until now.?. I was persuaded to allow comments, although it was a forgone conclusion that every RUclips viewing technically illiterate numb nut, (and there is an unlimited amount of them) for some reason experience an undeniable urge to open their mouths and utter unintelligible nonsense in an attempt to appear smart. Please take heed. “Blessed are they who have nothing to say and cannot be persuaded to say it.” Sandy Kidd
Why did you allow comments? Because the world is changing right now. More than ever people are starting to consider these ideas as reality and not science fiction. There are more people now questioning science! WE DO NOT UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING! I think that's why you allowed them. The people who care about this kind of thing want to see the world change and are looking for people to help.
what counts is not what sounds plausible, not what we believe, not what two witnesses claim, but by what is supported by hard evidence, rigorously and skeptically examined. extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. - carl sagan If it (the hypothesis) disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are who made the guess, or what his name is… If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it. - richard feynman
I ran a large hand held polishing machine for years at work.. The machine had a 12inch round wool pad on it. The pad was shaped like an upside down frisbee or deep dinner plate. it's edges curved upwards towards the machine itself. It was easy to feel the weight changed when the pad was rotating, as opposed to being stationary. The very strange aspect was that when the pad was held close to any surface, the entire machine would gain noticeable weight in you hand. Then become lighter as it was moved away from the surface. I have never heard of surface proximity changing gyro effect.
Although he was heading down the wrong path you have to admire his persistence. He wasn't doing a Stan Meyer on it. He genuinely thought he was on to something.
As long as this thing is fastened to the ground, that lift they are seeing could be from the rubbing of the thing against the bearings. If it truly lifts, then make 2 that are moving in opposite directions, attach a motor, and let the thing sit in a yard and lift off the ground. if it can do that without flipping all over the place and crashing, give me a call.
U people just don't get it there's been hundreds and hundreds of real free energy devices the elite will not let us have free power it takes away there welded death grip on the planet once that welded death grip was almost destroyed by no other than president Kennedy that's why they murdered him he was going to make the power brokers famous put a spotlight on them it's way to late now the only one that they can't corrupt and control there trying to throw in jail yes that's his name Donald trump u cannot corrupt what is already but what does is take a few cookies out of the cookie jar nothing like world domination like the kind they killed Kennedy trump is against these people
Should be called the how to avoid your wife and hide in the garage machine.
you got it ! , it is fake- anti tingkiling propaganda -..
How to get drunk without anyone bothering you
if my wife looked like that I'd be inventing stuff in my garage too
@@richardsonjoseph9660 lololololol
That's funny! LOL
Someone give this lady a medal for putting up with this guy 😂
More like his absence.
In the shape of a gyro.
it was great
It's the other way around
Poindexturetunes-:
He was
Awarded
A bravery commendation for actually
Getting into bed with her and
Consummating the marriage -
Bleeech!
Orange jumpsuit , his own personal prison
Test/research pilots wear orange flight suits, I think that's where he's going with it.
The entire thing is supposed to run on only one engine, there is no reason to have two engines. When the device spins on it's axis it could run the spinning wheels on the outside of the bell by positioning cogs against a stationary cog that spins a transmission. The entire thing spins against one engine that is attached to a vehicle or other object you wish to lift. Also, there needs to be 13 weighted wheels, not two. Two is not enough to produce enough lift for anything. Also, the weighted wheels need to be positioned within a bell so that the outside is smooth, this virtually eliminates wind drag. It still isn't an anti gravity machine though, it is a good step forward but this device isn't going to do what you want. The reason 13 is needed is because it will cause a disturbance in the balance of the two opposing forces, which at high speeds will cause lift to occur. It is balanced enough to be stable but the tiny variations in balance will produce lift.
Anti-Gravity Machine (part two): Somewhere in deep space....
Almost borders on a Python sketch... ...she ran off with the Milkman, and he was abducted by aliens. Bless... wonder if he ever found out that we've had working anti gravity tech since the 1930's?
One of the greatest Rube Goldberg machine's ever made. "I did all this while working with only a very basic grasp of mathematics and physics". Should have put that quote at the beginning of the video. He's got some good mechanical ingenuity, but definitely no understanding of physics.
Just a basic understanding of conservation of momentum would have freed up his life
I think that people that have created anything from nothing but a idea have lived under the same conditions a uncontrollable urge to figure it out.
Aye, the greatest inventors of all our species had thier share of simple minded criticism.
Many years I spent building my very own anti-gravity machine. Experiment after experiment. Failed test after test and then finally, I had it; my very own Anti-Gravity device. After the initial launch, all my notes on board, it all went wrong. It worked for sure, but the last I saw of it, it was flying past Pluto.
If my wife looked like that id be in the garage every second of the day too
I went ti school IN ABERDEEN SCOTLAND
Dad was cheif engineer and platform manager for the Murchison
Finally ! The machine to cook sausages by anti-gravity!
Great excuse to get out of housework.
And yet still no anti-gravity machine.
30 years later, they found that the machine never worked and strange smell coming from that garage.
This is the traditional woman we (some) traditional men still look for in 2023.... That believes in us and it's comprehensive and understanding.
And still takes us a sandwich to our garage
I hope she does not find him in a pool of his own consternation, Lobotomised by "The Machine'... Be Careful!
Its the reduction in fuel weight that suddenly lets it levitate, that is all.
i can see them too meeting at a bar.
Him: my what big eyes you have, ever heard of a gyroscope?
And he did not even own a gyroscope.
His wife's voice + hairdo explains it all
🏃
Good, now use round Neodynium magnets to turn the gyroscopes without belts and pullies
When she said she does the gardening, man that was some garden
Corporations: "That looks suspicious, kill that man."
The spinning gyros generate an upward force, they do not generate lift.
It's kind of sad how many people have a slight grasp of physics and extrapolate that into some nonsensical anti-gravity gadget that almost works, but never quite.
It's like they would save themselves a lot of frustration if they just took a couple semesters of science classes at a community college.
Shoulder beer called 'how to fool the public about outer space machine.'
Now they say this is how the flying saucer works. On history channel
So this might be the « tictoc thing »that the USA Navy witnessed on 2004?
It's funny to hear scottish accent - I didn't guess it's scottish until I checked where Dundee town is. It's a little similar to polish accent - hard "r" - so maybe Poles living in Scotland don't have to exercise english accent:) Anyway - was this device tested or checked if it really works ? I watched so many anti-grav engines and vehicles - that sky would be filled by copies of these devices..
In the Emerald Tablets Of Thoth The Atlantean he tells of his craft that is hidden under the Sphinx that overcomes Earth force (gravity)
Holy crap. A rotating machine that defies gravity. We need to give it a name. What about helicopter?
Helicopters do not defy gravity, they merely oppose gravity.
Works if your gyro is an RBCO superconducting magnet charged up to about a terawatt.
I’m lucky enough to know I don’t know enough, had he had the internet he’d probably have given up after a few weeks of research.
Magnets and Static. Create a gyroscope. Create a self revolving shape that has a pattern of control for such a gyro. Simple. Abcs
No one tell this man we have mixing bowl mixers?
Why not show it producing lift?
Has he been researching tic-tacs?
6:14 and yet they raised a family.
What about the laws of thermodynamics?
Where is this guy now??
According too 3.50 he may have built his spaceship and went to Mars. But couldn't figure out how to get back.
If I had a wife that looked like that I would spend all my time in the garage as well.
Behind every great man there's a greater woman.
Was later remarketed as time machine and sold to Napoleon Dynamite uncle Rico.
Dude's excuse to not do any house work or chores was to say he was building a space ship engine 😂😂😂😂
That lady's hair has been defying gravity since 1954
He's my hero
@@TonyEnglandUK 🤣
Can't tell but is his name sandy kid? Haha wow. Also this guys just brewing beer for sure
Also so glad scrooge McDuck is doing narrative voice overs
We'll know if he was truly on to something if he ends up getting murdered in part-2.
Found dead in a dumpster, coroner states toxicology results are under investigation.
@@kkristopher7413 Just wishful thinking.
Found dead in hotel room. Apparent suicide.
You guys are very misleading it was suicide by self-strangulation he was found with his arms tied behind his back
Nah, it was an accident, he shoot himself in the head... from behind.
Anyone wearing a orange jumpsuit like that, is bout to get shit done
If he had ever sold one of his machines, he would have ended up in jail for fraud ... and wearing another orange jumpsuit.
Trent Fuller 😁🤘
😂
Hahaha had to much time in prison well he just said fuck it ill go buy an Orange jumpsuit and lets see if i can get my mojo back tada!! Tesla would be like finally someone that doesn't give a fuck what they think about him!! I think he's got a good plug that bings him some uncut breaking bad juice! Keep up the tweekkng ya killin it
Trent Fuller this may be the single funniest comment ever
All those years in the garage and he finally created a machine that spins.
and is seriously out of balance.
Well, spinning is a good trick.
He reinvented the wheel. A wheel that runs perfectly out of balance.
😆😆😆
With two motors one gas one electric
His voice is similair to shawn connery and elvis presley combined
lol thought about the same, mostly the Elvis voice
its called a scottish accent. millions of people talk that way, not just sean connery lol
His hair is Elvis hair
hahahah - thats funny. I used to live a few doors down from Sean in London. One day I went out in a Tux and he passed me in the street in a scruffy tracksuit. Sort of irony.
@@joemusic2882 Wait - do you think... he IS Elvis?!
It’s nice to see Scrooge McDuck is broadening his skill set into narration.
Fucking prick.
😂
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on RUclips and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
Touché sir
Top comment 😂
If 1 man in his garage can make this with no money over 4 years, imagine what an unlimited black project budget and a team of top scientific minds can do.
But that team should be creative just like him.
Having knowledge is different from having curiosity and idea
For such things we need to think out of the box. The right thought should strike our mind just at the right moment.
Already happened in the Nevada dessert 51 paper clip
Its 3 motors ..... about 50 $ worth of materials total
And people wonder where UFOs USOs. originate brom. Isn't it obvious? WE made them. they're OURS. now...let that sink in. ready? Okay now ask this question. why? just why? think about all of the secrecy in private agencies. alien abductions. attle mutilations. YOUR OWN YOUR PEOPLE ARE ***KING WITH YOU! your just sheep. now. ack to sleep little sheeple. this is all a ream >:)
Other Half to enslave us to oil and basic electricity we could of left to other planets, maybe we have, maybe there is slavery on mars, while there is a genocide on the Middle East. Who knows how far this thing goes and where it leads
He seems to enjoy putting his head dangerously close to that spinning thing
Ikr.
Same thing I was thinking, wonder if he died from severe head trauma?
I noticed that as well...
So when he dies touching it people will think the secret services covered his death
That’ll be the producer: “get in shot, closer... closer..”
"Im giving her all she's got captain"
Funny, but you forgot " She can't take no more" captain.
Haa haa ha.....shit,!!
@@rodneyharris9681 It's funny how Star Trek, sexualized the poor Enterprises ship. She has been mangled by different species, space wars, planetary gravity, time travel chasing the Borg, and it's own internal warp-drive, which acts like a giant dildo, ripping her inner coil and preventing her from taking any more. I always thought that the Captain got off on this. Lol
@@marccarrion9164 That's "She canna take any more, captain!"
@@LarryH54 Damm, I just thought about what you said, and you're right. You're 100% correct. Lol
I would spend all my time in the garage too if my wife looked like that
I think he could have saved a lot of time by just learning some math and physics.
Not if he was basing his calculations on Einstein's restrictive laws, which obviously one day will be broken or surpassed by better laws and theories, as have those of other famous scientists. What would have helped is having access to the antigravity and flying machine patents designed by Nikolai Tesla, but the majority of those are still locked away. Modern science is held back by those too scared to disagree with Einstein and also by greed, as all the ingenious and new inventions are bought and paid for by the wealthy oil and electric companies, to prevent them being manufactured and ruining their profits.
Soon as he spoke I knew, seeing the women with a mouth full of Wrigley extra. I realised his mum was his sister
@@DJIInLondon LMAO!
lol
@@DJIInLondon 💀
I like the polite professor, he knows perfectly well the machine will never work but doesn't spoil it for him and encourages him to try to improve the machine until he realizes too...
This is the MOST SADDEST STORY I ever witnessed. Poor guy and his wife.
People have lots of hobbies.. nobody was harmed..
@@morbidmanmusic Obviously, they don't have kids and he has no income. Very sad situation.
"Aye, I've built a machine, donkayy"
@Djaalab Joseph I was thinking shrek but ramsay works too lol
Probably this? Lol
ruclips.net/video/N6j_13-qzDY/видео.html
You must be American.
@@nairdacharles9492 *Texan
If he had an America wife she would of left him already!
And force him to sell half his machinery to not continue in his work.
Ate you black American?
It’s really sad that people like this trick themselves into thinking they have some thing when they don’t. He even tricked his family and wasted his entire life for nothing.
I get your point but it's not wasted if he had fun and the illusion of working on a breakthrough project elevated his subjective life quality to a higher level.
Very sad to see someone so blind to the spirit of exploration and discovery. We don't find anything new by doing things we already know work. What you're advocating for is stasis.
To be fair most people waste their entire lives working and hustling away for nothing in the end anyway.
One of my strongest memories as a teenager was seeing this exact machine demonstrated on the old Nation Wide show, and I have been obsessed with toying with similar ideas involving the hidden forces of gyroscopes ever since. I can't believe I have found this again after so many decades. Thank you for posting!
What would those hidden forces be exactly? They're quite well understood, even around the time this was made.
@@matthewyabsley YES... that's the thing, right? I'm seeing some comments and... My God... People need to stop skypping classes...
@@sandokan1578skipping English classes for instance? 😂
@@gasmanrus😂😂Burn!
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on RUclips and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
6:25 Prof. Laithwaite could have performed a very easy test by simply standing on a scale with the disk spinning and not spinning. There is no difference in weight. He just did not understand the physics of a gyroscope which are admittedly not quite simple.
7:29
😂
@TQ jokes on you buddy, the Flux capacitor was a hoax! Besides, everyone knows you need a minimum of 4 food processors eating a full bundle of banana peels EACH to reach anywhere near 1.21 gigawatts!
Back when real women existed, bless you love
No hiccups, no loneliness which will lead to cheating. If not, then I’ll him be!! 👈🏼 that’s the attitude
of COURSE you have a Punisher avatar 😂
dude can't get laid and he blames it's the way women are today and not the bald acorn he's got between his legs
gtfoohwts 😂
@Demo he can't be an idiot, he was just onto something.
Sheesh. Spoken like a true dumbass. Hopefully you have zero women in your life 😂
@Demo I guess you didn't see the flying saucer model he had.
The guy could’ve saved 10 years of his life by just putting a propeller on the model airplane engine and would’ve generated more lift then his entire machine in less than five minutes
That requires air.... How u suppose that to work in enclosed environment or in space?
Thinking the same thing once I saw the starter and heard the two stroke fire
It was a make work to avoid the mrs project
If you are so smart, just do it yourself.
LOLL these comments are good.
Dude wasted so much of this poor womans life... yikes ☹️
She had the freedom to divorce him.
So far it seems he might just have re-invented the Gyroscope.
Hello Phil violin maker! Retired professional violinist/violist here. I think you just might be right! Truly mind boggling isn't it? I feel sorry for his poor wife. She's a widow/divorcee without a death or court ruling to show for it. If she's still alive these forty years on, she'll be left a friendless pauper if he predeceases her. It's pretty evident at this point that it all came to naught.
Your pretty close gyroscope, the gyroscope uses a fulcrum and the arm of the gyroscope once spun presents lift. So imagine a wheel with in a wheel or more once spun presents lift as with the demonstration with the barbell. Once the barbell disc spun and the man becomes the fulcrum the barbell disc became weightless. A wheel with in a wheel activated by an engine creates anti gravity. Except the multi giro mechanism is much larger big time.
@@jojolafrite90 I pray to God Almighty that He reveals the secrets of flight and anti gravity, to His/God's Elect One's. I pray He saves that adventure for us, away from you hypocritical mockers. This govt sold itself out to fallen entities for the Knowles that we could of gotten for free from God. Obviously the helical pattern, is a pattern of the universe. And we can capture free energy if we work with nature instead of against it. And I pray that He casts down the fallen angels and their human followers and deceivers. Those in high places censoring and eliminating men who come across too much knowledge. I know they've found much more efficient ways to create flying craft using gyroscope effect and/or mercury vortex propulsion engines. The US govt has certainly studied the crap out of this and left us all in the dark.
May God give us the victory, through our trials and tribulations. Not you nay saying mocking hypocrites who do nothing but attack a man's hopes and dreams.
When all you are is a shadow. A shade of a man
@@Chompchompyerded o my goodness. The man is working out of his house... garage. His family still had access to him. His wife found a fake social life more important than discovering anti gravity. Which is exactly what he is cracking into.
Women have made this whole life into a fake materialistic splurge to beautify themselves and compete with others over God's natural gifts and have the audacity to criticize a man seeking street greatness. Bet if he created anti gravity tech and became the world's richest man. You and almost every other woman would divorce their husband to get a piece of that pie.
This world is PURE hypocrisy
@@garygallegos8202
No.
The way he motioned the craft moving is the same way bob Lazar said the sport model moved through space belly up
Watch Joe Rogan 1361
Stephen V so Bob Lazar watch this documentary
Would it have been a documentary or live broadcast or RUclips video?
So you're saying Sandy was driving?
If only more people believed in this horse shit science. Imagine how far man could go.
whow ,he dosnt seem to be concerned about having his brain cracked open with that dangerous spinning gyro.
I wish someone would crack my brain open so i can get off the horrible piece of molten rock
*head
thats what i was thinking seeing that heap of pointed metal flying around inches from his head!
Sir, I am now an old man and I have spent most of my life at similar pursuits. Nothing else mattered. I ate, slept and breathed the research of a particular device. Then came a point where I was just about broken and alone which forced me to peruse more lucrative endeavors. God bless you brother. Thank you for sharing. Sometimes inventing can be very lonely, not many people understand. Been there, done that. I wish you all the luck in the universe.
Dave G god be with us all
@@ronr.53400 Which god?
True.👍
The only God The creator of the heavens and the earth
@@JohnDoe-op8nn There are no gods, but belief in them is the cause of most of the misery on Earth. Keep your sick ideas to yourself.
6:35 - this nothing more than; physics, angular momentum, torque, and gyroscopic motion.
It is not anti-gravity.
Sorry, you're completely wrong there.
Gravity and inertia are completely different things.
Inertia is the property by which mass/matter continues in its existing state when no force is acting upon it; whereas gravity is the (attractive) property that; (i) provides mass with the feature of weight; and (ii) warps space-time according to Einstein.
Newtonian gravity is unusual in that it is the only force the pulls; rather than pushes - as is the case with all other modeled forces.
Now if you had said that gravity and acceleration were the same perhaps that may be the start of an intelligent discussion about Einstein’s TOR.
Take care.
@XY ZW That is why I provided you with a (simpler) Newtonian version of gravity.
As, I was quite sure that - since you were already mistaken about the science involved with the so called “Anti Gravity” video as well as being clueless about what inertia and gravity are - you probably would not know about (and/or reject) other more advanced theories (such as Einstein’s theories) that require a very good grasp of astrophysics and you to accept that you're wrong.
Einstein’s theory about relativity/gravity - contrary to your claims that assert it has never been proven - was largely accepted/substantiated by several tests within the 1800 and/or 1900’s; including the test which verified the theories’ ability to accurately explain/predict the (previously insurmountable/problematic) precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion.
In the mid to late 1800’s and also the early 1900’s Newton’s gravitational/other theories (particularly the Newtonian physics that dealt with 2 body systems) were unable to reliably/accurately explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion.
Yet Einstein’s theory was able to resolve, what was ultimately, a shortfall in Newton’s gravitation/other theories - by way of accurately explaining/predicting the precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun.
Clearly from the fact that Isaac Newton (and others) failed to get it right, accurately explaining/predicting the precession of Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun, was no simple task.
You may be surprised to learn that the problem was not resolved by pretending magnetism and gravity were one and the same.
The way Einstein solved the problem (to both his peer’s and also the scientific communities’ satisfaction) was (not by way of pretending magnetism equaled inertia, but) by way of applying his theory of general relativity.
Please read the following slowly (and use a dictionary) so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . . .
In Einstein’s theory of general relativity the precession of Mercury was modeled/represented and explained by;
A) The spasmodic variance that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it periodically orbited around the Sun; within its own elliptical plane.
B) Treating gravity as a curvature of space-time.
In doing so Einstein revealed that, unlike Newtonian Physics, his general relativity provided a means within which to solve previously insurmountable and/or complex astrophysical problems, as well as; (i) accurately explain the observed precession that Mercury and/or its perihelion/aphelion exhibited; (ii) predict the future position of Mercury; (iii) accurately forecast the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as Mercury orbited around the Sun; and; (iv) highlight the deficiencies associated with (the widely accepted) Newtonian mechanics/physics.
Given the acceptance of Newtonian mechanics at the time despite the fact that it clearly fell over when it came to explaining Mercury’s precession around the Sun and other scientific phenomena; the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, become instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate construct for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time.
From there the fact that Einstein’s theory of general relativity was able to pass other tests and accurately reveal/predict; (i) how light behaved and/or deviated from a straight path/line (in ways that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) in the presence of a large mass; (ii) relativistic time delays in the propagation electromagnetic signals (that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) as a result of the electromagnetic signal path being close to a large mass and/or the Sun; and (iii) the precession of binary pulsars with only 4° arc per year of orbital shift in ways that, not only were consistent with the space-time curvatures Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicted for the binary pulsar’s precessions - but also, then went on to become the foundation for accurately calculating the masses of the 2 neutron stars constituting the binary pulsar.
From there the discovery of gravitational lensing - predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity - further bolstered Einstein’s general relativity theory.
As such, you are wrong about inertia, gravity, and how proven some of Einstein’s theories are.
Furthermore, inertia and magnetism are not the same; so you're wrong there too.
That said, if you were to provide *proof* that inertia and magnetism were - as you claim - supposedly same, then I would be happy to read (and/or laugh at) it.
By proof, I mean your theory - that inertia and magnetism are one and the same - must be published within a respected scientific journal and be reviewed/accepted by experts in their field.
Until that happens;
A) Almost every deep space probe and/or GPS satellite that has been and/or currently is traversing around the earth and/or through our solar system and/or beyond; will still be utilizing aspects of Einstein’s TOR to ensure positional/other data and performance is accurate.
B) Please take care and try to get some sleep.
@XY ZW You seem to have overlooked that (in addition to me previously advising that you ought read my previous post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand)I didn’t explicitly state that Einstein’s theory of general relativity served as *“proof”* for any of the theorem’s we were discussing.
So, sorry to burst your little bubble there.
You seem to have jumped to that conclusion all by yourself - which is a trait of bad science.
Let’s try again; and this time, please read my post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . .
Here is an excerpt from my previous post and note the word *construct* . . .
Jim Stanley Post 27 April 2020; “the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, became instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate *construct* for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time”.
As such, even your recent post’s comment . . . . .
XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”.
That (whilst pretending gravitational lensing has not been observed - whilst at the same time overlooking the other examples I provided that substantiate how/why Einstein’s theory of general relativity became a more accurate theory) appears to seek to discredit Einstein’s theory of general relativity insofar as it applies to the curvature of Spacetime constituting relativistic gravity; is questionable for various reasons including the following . . . .
It may well be the case that (as you seem to say) the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of Mercury as you put it) does not in itself substantiate that, as you say, “space bends”. Furthermore, it may also be the case that (as you seem to say) that the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of mercury as you put it) is also disproof of Newton’s theory.
But all of that actually fits with what I stated previously.
As, previously I described the success of Einstein’s theory of general relativity within the context of (at least) disproving Newtonian mechanics and providing a better *construct*; which, really, is what your below and/or above-mentioned statement basically says, before it goes astray by way of pretending the win for Einstein’s theory of general relativity never occurred.
XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”.
Only a fool would argue that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (regardless of how reliable it may be) didn’t experience a win as a result of disproving the Newtonian theory of gravity and/or providing a better *construct* (Spacetime and the curvature of it) to explain the precession of Mercury’s perihelion.
If you wish to discredit Einstein’s theories your time may be better spent on;
A) Understanding his theories more comprehensively and within a historical context; rather than questionably presuming acceptance/success was not granted to Einstein for his theories of relativity, and that gravitational lensing was not a part of it.
B) Mathematically examining Einstein’s use of pseudotensors to represent gravitational fields.
So, at this stage, as far as I am concerned, it seems you're misinterpreting my posts (possibly) as a means to portray yourself as being correct; all whilst you're yet to substantiate that magnetism and gravity are the same.
So, before I move ahead and deal with your other questionable allegations and oversights . . . . .
If you would kindly substantiate prove that magnetism and gravity are the same (and/or reference the scientific papers that support this view) that would be nice; as it was with this claim that your opened your first response/post time mine.
*eats popcorn in anticipation*
@@StormCentre88 I feel your pain trying to explain this. I worked in energy-automation science/engineering and quite often I would see ridiculous experiments from someone having "thrown a physics textbook in a blender" and conjoined phrases and concepts in a manner that is incorrect. Sometimes I would explain to a friend that it wouldn't work and explain why. Even when I kept it simple and politely said that the energy input would exceed the energy output. Then I would get a pause and a blank look and they would say, " but this is something different". I gave up.
I'd be building a UFO too. My god. He's trying to get his wife home.
Underrated comment LoL
Dang snap.. 💯
Dude im rolling!!
Harsh, but funny!
That comment wins the Internet sir. Well done 💰💰💰
This was how my ex wife was with my coding. She was so supportive. I spent a fucking lot of hours on random projects... God do I miss her dearly.
LIES I tell you, LIES. Just admit it, life is more peaceful and simplified without her........ mine is 🤣🤣🤣
Let me guess you now own 25% of what you use to.
She was awesome wife, it was only 4 year to this point.. Behind every good man is an even better women.
Mines would tell me I worthless when I was going thru tough financial time, made me feel like utter garbage. I picked myself up and moved on. Glad there good women who supports their husband
Word.
My ex was a piece of shit though. Good riddance.
-Did you do it?
Yes!
-What did it cost?
Everything...
Team Thanos..1
Like Leonidas in 300 movie
-Give them nothing... but take from them everything!
Team THANOS!!!
yes it is propaganda.
I thought that was his mother. Holy hell no wonder he was making a time machine.
for most part of my life from age 5 to age 29 I been working alone on my designs until I got into college and my inventing process changed. For those inventors who keep pushing boundaries in the garage a gentle advice, a textbook or two of reading and thorough analysis will save a lot of time, money and anguish later on.
What do you invent?
@@ishkibable The guy that spent 24 years living off his parents and inventing things in their garage is ambiguous, vague and provides few details. *Surprised face*
This is a very good point.
Think way outside the box.
But make sure you've mastered the basics first
I've learned that the hard way as well.
The problem with your advice is that almost everything you learn in your text books is either completely wrong or it teaches you limitations based on our currently accepted physics. People like Sandy dont need text books they would actually hinder his ingenuity. People like Sandy are directed by unseen forces on himself. In summary, your advice for especially gifted people is BULLOCKS!
@@suckOnThese3 you can use the books as stepping stones they usually have the fundamentals which are really important when putting the pieces of a puzzle together
funny that he shows us the upwards UFO flight 30 years before the US Airforce made that video public with an UFO doing exactly that
Have you been hiding under a rock?
Yeah
You mean the avrocar
Has antigravity machine. Still opens garage door by hand
Yes. And we still do lots of things with our hands. Amazing isn't it?
@@robertdewar1752 yes huuurrrrr duuurrrrrr
Love this guy so much ambition and peace in him.. amazing wife loyal respectful and so accepting.. The women of today.. would have this guy done for domestic abuse..
Considering when this was recorded you should know that she had no other option than to accept it. Back then we could not let a flat, get a credit card, or open a checking or savings account, or buy a house without a man's signature. We also made only a fraction of the amount that men made for exactly the same work, and in addition we were limited to what kinds of work we could do. Most worst jobs were considered women's work. We are much better off now because if we did get stuck with a guy who decided to go lost pilot on us we can get out of the marriage, get good jobs (still paid a bit less than the boys), open financial accounts and live a fairly normal life afterward. It's a different world now than it was then.
Pure genius = pure creativity. Some will spend a lifetime to reach new levels, new ideas or new realities.
That thing looks bloody lethal!
What a great woman, and he gave it a fair shot, more power to him for trying!
You can't screw up if you never try anything, but you'll never make anything good neither..
Was anyone else thinking “...what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired...” - Liam Neeson, Taken
I was thinking, "how on Earth did he ever make a living as a tool-fitter?"
Notice how he shows that it would fly belly up just like the one that the fighter pilots from the US Navy caught on gun cam
That caught my attention as well.
And bob Lazar
That navy video is of a distant heat signature like a jet exhaust.
The shape you see in the video is hot air, and glare. The "turning" sideways is glare from the glass that's turning in front of the camera.
Also, its targeting pod video, not the gun cam. Gun cam being slang for HUD cam.
Came here to post this lol, the flying belly up is just to much of a coincidence for me.
Great salute to his wife.!!!
Great Wife to support his dreams! If you have a wife like this take time out for hers dreams as well🤔💯
A great wife doesn't have dreams, she has children.
@@LuciusKyrus sexism is cringe bro.
@@haroldfarthington7492 Yeah, most soyBoys think like you.
@@LuciusKyrus I think the woman’s admirable for supporting her conspiracy theorist husband. Bruh don’t have to be a dick tho. Tf is your problem
Janet is rated a good looking woman in Scotland. This is why we are so miserable.
It's the weather man......
Ha har.
@@bansheebot2 I did not see a weather man in the video?
I understand him and her 100%. It's a lonely road when you have something you want to do or prove. Either success or failures, you still want to try.
It happens to me too a lot of people when you become obsessed with something and you get so close to it from what you've imagined and put on paper and then when it comes to life it just becomes an obsession. And it is men and women like this who have changed our world look at Einstein he couldn't hold a relationship to save his life because they're obsessed the people who invented jet engines the internal combustion engine and so on these are all obsessions at one point now it's just a reality we take for granted
I have always believed there’s a way to manipulate gravity with magnets. Maybe if you have an enclosure with all the same polarities pushing against each other.
You got something right , I believe.
Entropy would like a word with you.
There is always an equilibrium.
Magnet fields are just electric fields seen in a moving frame of reference, lots of youtube videos on it of physics PhDs. If you can't manipulate gravity with electric fields, you can't do it with magnetic fields.
This is my 3ed time watching this and it still amazes me. We r all into something we r driven to. U should be proud of yourself and your wife is someone very special.
Learn how to spell.
See “Antigravity Machine (Part 3)”
Kind Regards,
Sandy Kidd
I didn't found
Will be watching and learning all tonight! My cousin Jimmy Fraser used to talk about you all the time when he first come to Australia, jimmy and Jan and their kids Cameron and Leslie. Howdy you genius!
Can’t seem to find part three
ruclips.net/video/ExCC9zZeZuY/видео.html
His suit looks like a prison jumpsuit
Wtf what year 1978 prsion?
This video was made in 1982 - so where is my personal flying saucer? Was his devotion paid off with success, or was his life wasted?
its a gamble, some ppl did the same thing and became billionaires, elon musk bil gates, steve jobs, steve vozniak to name a few, but many didn't have same luck
@@iTube4U They did not go against elementary physics.
Did any of you ever wonder why I did not permit comments to be posted with respect to this item up until now.?.
I was persuaded to allow comments, although it was a forgone conclusion that every RUclips viewing technically illiterate numb nut, (and there is an unlimited amount of them) for some reason experience an undeniable urge to open their mouths and utter unintelligible nonsense in an attempt to appear smart.
Please take heed.
“Blessed are they who have nothing to say and cannot be persuaded to say it.”
Sandy Kidd
You are a crank. Know your place.
Sandy, I'd very much like to contact you in private. My email address is principalwisdom at g mail dot c o m. Thanks.
Sandy Kidd Hello Sandy. Is that you from the film?
Why did you allow comments? Because the world is changing right now. More than ever people are starting to consider these ideas as reality and not science fiction. There are more people now questioning science! WE DO NOT UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING! I think that's why you allowed them. The people who care about this kind of thing want to see the world change and are looking for people to help.
what counts is not what sounds plausible, not what we believe, not what two witnesses claim, but by what is supported by hard evidence, rigorously and skeptically examined. extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. - carl sagan
If it (the hypothesis) disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are who made the guess, or what his name is… If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it. - richard feynman
He worked 24 hours a day and she couldn't even brush her teeth...
i found myself expecting the monty python crew to come barging in
Nobody expects the money python crew to come barging in
Haha I agree, the narrator sounded like Michael Palin doing a Scottish impersonation
count me in
lol so true
we are just gonna make one ourself
I saw this when I was a kid and it got me interested in machines and physics. Never thought id see it again.
I always wondered what happened to this ? 🤔
I wonder where his tech went.
@@barblitt4222 government had something to do with it
@@stanleybochenek1862 very true and very sad.
@@stanleybochenek1862 Sure buddy.
Eventually the husband always escapes to the garage and ends up living there.
That is why im never going to get married. I want my whole house available not just my shit confined to the garage.
@@bazookajoe8904 why do you want the whole house. The only interesting mechanical stuff happens in the shed
sssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, thats the plan
I ran a large hand held polishing machine for years at work.. The machine had a 12inch round wool pad on it. The pad was shaped like an upside down frisbee or deep dinner plate. it's edges curved upwards towards the machine itself. It was easy to feel the weight changed when the pad was rotating, as opposed to being stationary.
The very strange aspect was that when the pad was held close to any surface, the entire machine would gain noticeable weight in you hand. Then become lighter as it was moved away from the surface. I have never heard of surface proximity changing gyro effect.
could be just a vacuum effect . that disc could act as a "propellor" and when the gap gets tighter it produce enough airflow to get some suction..
you mean close but still no contact, right? I'd understand it somehow if the disc diminished its speed by any means.
Sounds like eddy currents from a coil motor and either a copper or an aluminium surface brought together. Magnetic braking basically....
Although he was heading down the wrong path you have to admire his persistence. He wasn't doing a Stan Meyer on it. He genuinely thought he was on to something.
I’d love to own his prototype saucer. That’s a real life treasure right there.
bet it's made out of shortbread tin lids with tartan paint on 😂😂😂😂
As long as this thing is fastened to the ground, that lift they are seeing could be from the rubbing of the thing against the bearings. If it truly lifts, then make 2 that are moving in opposite directions, attach a motor, and let the thing sit in a yard and lift off the ground. if it can do that without flipping all over the place and crashing, give me a call.
U people just don't get it there's been hundreds and hundreds of real free energy devices the elite will not let us have free power it takes away there welded death grip on the planet once that welded death grip was almost destroyed by no other than president Kennedy that's why they murdered him he was going to make the power brokers famous put a spotlight on them it's way to late now the only one that they can't corrupt and control there trying to throw in jail yes that's his name Donald trump u cannot corrupt what is already but what does is take a few cookies out of the cookie jar nothing like world domination like the kind they killed Kennedy trump is against these people