YDDES Of course there is the missing piece of the puzzle of what it is in that mass that creates the gravity in the first place. Maybe there are a few that have cracked the code and got buried in the bureaucratic red tape or buried all together for "reasons of national security" or whatever other reasons they can dream up. Not unlike what you have done but can't shed any further light on I'll bet. Don't get me wrong I am a skeptic when it comes to things like flat earth (because it's stupid low hanging fruit and easily debunked) but some things are not so easily explained away. There are precedents that are official yet not explained, but also aren't acknowledged by skeptics in any way shape or form. I always challenge the skeptics to reply but they always decline, it doesn't seem right to me. I make this type of comment about once a week in much larger threads fyi, and still nothing.
@@itachi_uchiha1538 Thats a pretty movie-esque hypotechical. It's almost like it is completely made up nonsense that never has and doubtfully ever will occur in human history. Also, I would not trust the US military any more than i would trust the Chinese military.
So Ning Li: this is a way to make anti gravity 5 years later: nope, doesn't work leaves University and starts company of the "thing that doesn't work". Gets awarded grant from defense for the same "thing that doesn't work". Nowhere to be seen afterwards...
If it is storing energy, the DoD would be interested. It could be used as a non chemical battery, even if it has no effect on gravity at all. That potentially sidesteps the theoretical maximum we are running into with regards to chemical energy storage. A battery with 10x the storage of current batteries would permit aircraft with longer range and no infra red signature. That is even before we consider the destructive uses of it. Conservation of energy means that the energy stored is dissipated rapidly if confinement is lost. Unlike a conventional battery with two chemicals separated by a barrier, this has spinning bits kept from crashing by cold and quantum mechanics. If it breaks, it goes bang. 10x current battery storage would make it double up as an explosive with more energy than anything currently available. The energy not being chemical also means we don't run into chemistry based temperature limits. Get it to 100x storage and most of the energy would be X-rays. That could potentially replace a fission device as the primary in a hydrogen bomb. There goes all the nuclear safeguards, as those rely on limiting fission primaries. If they have demonstrated a way to pump energy into a system that doesn't have well understood theoretical limits, the DoD will put money into finding those limits. The cost of letting somebody else find something amazing first with regards to energy storage is way too high a risk.
Given the number of bullshit science "discoveries" your DoD has funded, I wouldn't be surprised to discover it doesn't work, period. Also: when the military find a game changer, they use it. _Always._ The fact they didn't speaks volumes. It's a dead end, like all those other "secret projects" that led to nothing.
@@agsystems8220 I was going to rant about this underrated comment, then I saw it's posted 10 mins ago. So yeah. This event doesn't prove the scientist found anti-gravity, but it proves she found something of great potential value. I'm sure we will find about it a couple of decades when it gets declassified and put into smarphones.
Actually enjoyed the relatively accurate explanation of current theories. Hate when people assume they are “proven” generally just because of mathematics.
Identifying areas of science: If it is green and wiggles, it is Biology. If it is smelly, it is Chemistry. If it does not work, it is Physics. If it is absolute and yet somehow exceedingly vague and fluffy, it is mathematics.
While the general public may make such assumptions (and those public assumptions are rarely based on math), physicists do not. Physicists never assume that a prevailing theory is the gospel or that it is set in stone. That is simply not how they think. At the same time however they also realize some of these theories can be extremely useful even before they are proven to be 100% correct. In fact theoretical physics is responsible for many technological breakthroughs which have in turn brought us many of our modern conveniences. As for some lay people insisting that some theories have been proven to be completely correct when they have not, this can definitely be annoying at times. Still, this is not nearly as annoying as the people on the flip side of that coin. I’m referring of course to people who are so ignorant and pig headed that they will even deny that natural laws are proven facts. For example they might insist that perpetual motion - and thus energy from nothing - is possible when in fact it is not possible in this universe as such a thing would violate the laws of physics (laws, not theories). These people are not necessarily all completely unintelligent of course but rather the are just highly irrational and because of this their opinions are always based on what they need to believe rather than on the facts. These types also tend to be conspiracy theorists more often than not. In any case there is no point in trying to reason with them and trying to do so is just an exercise in futility.
These are, indeed, weighty matters to consider. For some reason I find them quite attractive. I am however, at a loss as to why I keep falling for them.
Department of Defense: "Oh.. Whatcha got there." Inventor: "I just invented this anti-gravity device." .... **Inventor goes missing and stops posting publically** Media (on command from DoD): "Too bad we can't verify these results." Edit: haha, thanks for the likes and comments guys!
Typically when a scientist's research disappears from public journals and universities is either one, they gave up and there experiments are failures. Two, there funding gets cut and the research projects are cancelled. And finally, if they are successful and they get Dod approval, there research will go dark and become classified depending upon the invention and whether or not the military wants to reveal certain military technological advancements to the public. They usually reveal "new military technologies" at a time when they have developed a classified technology that makes the older one obsolete. When the media reports a story about DARPA developing some new technology, it's probably already 20 years old or more.
@@alphega1983 “There” means in that place: We drove there early in the morning. “Their” is a possessive form of they: They gave their earnings to charity. “They're” is a contraction of they+are: When Grandma and Grandpa get here, they're going to take us out to lunch.
@@alphega1983 Another angle on that though is that it is much easier to convince DARPA grant reviewers of things than domain experts like other scientists, so a lot of shady operators, when their research looks like it is about to collapse publicly, stop publishing and convincing the DoD to fund them. As long as you give them convincing powerpoint presentations every year or so and have a good personal relationship with someone in the department, you can fund a small lab for a LONG time and not produce any results. People put WAY too much faith in the professionalism and planning of DARPA. It is mostly rotating fiefdoms, vague calls for research, and blocks of money given out to what sounds interesting to people unqualified to evaluate feasibility but who really like meetings and paperwork.
1:Discovers possible anti-gravity options. 2: Puts 'new' research out saying there is no anti-gravity. 3: Opens her own company and calls it *AC Gravity LLC* Nothing suspicious here at all.
exactly, I know someone that disagrees with this baloney sandwish..Antigravity has been explored already...Einstein was wrong in many issues inc Spooky action at a distance, which is called Entanglement...too much baloney sandwich in physics taught in school..Antigravity in itself is one of many terms explored already..How about air cavity resonance instead? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov
@@lordinquisitorjohn1357 yes john. You can just create $ forever as much as you like. Even though every other time in human history it has failed this time it won't. Of course
Roland Deschain That is actually false, as there are gravimetric forces in space. There is gravimetric forces everywhere, no matter how small, due to how gravity is defined in both newtonian physics and physics surrounding gravity by Einstein.
@@millhouse782 Superconductors have been around since the 1950s, do you think nobody bothered to see if they affected gravity untill a few years ago..... nay
This is literally what Bob Lazar has been saying since the day he came out with his claims. That the craft that the government have use some kind of anti-gravity technology powered by element 115.
What about that released videos by the NAVY of UFO's? That looked like anti gravity to me. The pilots seemed shocked in the video, at what they were seeing. These people are highly trained to identify other aircraft.
It sounds like any time we hear about scientists getting close to discovering a method of simulating anti-gravity both the project and scientist go dark and are never heard about again. Gee, I can only imagine why this is.
@@Saugaverse True, every year thousands of people "get close" to discovering a free energy device, only for the project and creator to go dark for the same reason. It failed! ;)
@@HPPalmtopTube No such thing as free energy, but yes a few drastically novel energy sources/harvesters are researched in secret I believe. We live in an amazing world, the truth is out there.
Like bionic arms but actually getting closer, also aerospike engine, succeded but never used since it isnt efficient because of the weight... Also random, do yoi think quantum computers will really get close?
You are like that "Dizzy" character. He discovered Anti-Gravity after falling out of a tree and breaking his leg. He has been "anti-gravity" ever since. Perhaps the men in black threw him off the tree?
*has promising results* "nevermind guess it was nothing" *goes private, gets Defense money, goes quiet but still operational* Sounds like it was something
@@JeanLucCaptain Damn right. I boycotted CBS so they'd know not to take Advantage of us loyal trek fans but I was sad to hear so many weak willed people gave in and forked over CBS's subscription fee just to watch 1 tv series in real time. They couldnt even wait a few years to see it free thru syndication. They may live long but with such weak wills, they clearly will not prosper. CBS U make Ferengis look honest!
@@gamaximusaurelius8969 KIA lol what? First of all in the military in assassinations we say 'liquidated' or 'dispatched', second if she was on to something they would recruit her and definitely not kill her.
@@rollog1248 Term fits the purpose. on other hand do you really think the gov going to hire everyone who comes up with an idea like that and gives a nice fat big pay check with a Porsche and villa on Malibu?? u must be naive mate. also, why hire if they already have the tech?? Can u prove the opposite? Tech like that would totally ruin the known economy. They not gonna give a chance to leak information to foreign forces therefore she is highly likely a liability.thats why...
@@rollog1248 Firstly, it's concerning that the military has more than one word for assassination. Secondly, if they already had the technology, they wouldn't want or need somebody else coming up with it.
In the late 60s too early '70s my dad was studying electronics for the military they were using it to project variations in radar signals used at the time to protect B-52 bombers over Vietnam. He mentioned to me that there was a story about a device that could be attached to equipment to make it lighter and more easily moved. We hear a lot of stories and come in contact with many things throughout our lives.
@@BrjanBuckmaster if you would have asked anyone about atomic energy 500 year’s ago he would have called you crazy. We don’t know what can be done in 500 year’s from today. The possibilities are endless.
I’m a simple man. I see a new curious droid video, I click on it. In all seriousness, you’ve been an inspiration. I’ve been watching your videos for years at this point. As a scientist, I’ve always loved your content. And as now being part of the space program, your videos have a different weight and relevancy
@@Bloodgt3 I was saying WHAT !, because I didn't understand shit he was saying....lol, But the disappearance doesn't surprise me. She's maybe working on a new weapon to kill people right now. For the Gov. no less.
It would seem on the face of it humans have had it in the past if the hindu sacred literature is anything to go by. And it seems that it is. As a concept it should be possible using very high end super conductors and super magnets. It would be necessary to produce power of a high amount in a very small limited space using a mercury ion generator of some kind as the sanskrit literature writes about this concept. Its a matter of harnessing negative and positive effects of magnetism.
_"Gravity. The Big G, got a hold on me"_ isn't accurate, which was one of the problems with Newtonian gravity. According to Newton, if the sun instantaneously winked out of existence, the Earth would immediately careen out of orbit. Both light an gravity are extremely fast... however, we know through observation and experiment that neither is instantaneous; both travel at 299,792,458 m/s.
Anty gravity is probably the only way to create the force needed to reach, a unbelievable speed. Never possible for many reasons. There's a giant pile of questions that need answers But clarity it's hiding within.
He legally has to wear the shirt due to legal reason. He is a noted illegal drag racer but he has no car yet races drag cars. Crazy I know but he runs at a top speed of 126mph with unrivaled acceleration if he did not have that shirt drivers wouldnt know it was really him and they would therefore jack him in the neck with a 2by4. Good day all
looks like she pocketed the money. I mean if the government comes around and offers you a lot money for research that in the end will amount to nothing anyway, you'd still want the money lol
@@carlosandleon if only girl clothes had pockets. Most are just flaps for show or tiny pockets just large enough to fit a single square wrapped condom. You think we enjoy having to carry around our cute designer purses? You're right, we do! 😜
Speaking of sci fi travel. I wonder what a warp would look like? Would this space ship just disappear in thin air as it enters the fourth dimension? Or would it disappear in some direction? Or a portion of it disappearing before another part does? What would it visually look like if it could be seen at all?
In the summer of 1967, the Rice University Physics Dept. sent a backyard inventor to me at Shell Pipeline Corp. to evaluate his supposed antigravity device. The demo device was made largely of Plexiglas and powered by compressed air. The theory was that acceleration of the air stream would "induce" a static gravitational effect, visible by the motion of small balls. The embarrassing thing was, it seemed to work as advertised! A back-of-the-envelope calculation showed that any genuine effect along those lines should have not have been detectable. We hypothesized several causes for the observed effect. After some work in the machine shop and a couple of tries, we were able to track the effect down to leakage of turbulent flow within the air stream. Nice try, but no cigar.
@1234 Can you tell me what causes the Tajmar effect in rotating near-superconducting metals? Do you think it is a symptom of the Casimir effect, composite bosons interacting with gravitomagnetic fields, complex gyroscopic procession and vibrational error, or interactions with the recently confirmed Higgs? When you push a Megajoule per microsecond through superconducting discs, what particle exactly allows some of that energy to travel through blocks of lead, if at all? (You can find a video on this one) If we can ignore the UFO-Mania campaigns, and think rationally for ourselves, we could certainly get a lot of individuals studying these materials. We need a lot more yes or no answers than what we have, then we can drill down on why. There are many researchers that have been working on this for over 2 or 3 decades now, some with more or less success and attention to detail. One that seemed to believe what he said on television shows was Eugene Podkletnov, but his dishonesty or irrationality got him expelled from his institution. It appears that he was trying to explain flux pinning or induced diamagnetism in place of gravitational shielding, but the jury of peers is still out, and his 1997 comments are still a mystery.
6Beers&1Waitress The Germans were experimenting with it since the 1930s. The TR-3B is the first known anti gravity vehicle the US has developed. Today we have the Black Manta. Take a look at Bob Lazar on RUclips. The Black Manta is discussed in detail by industrialsurrealism.com. "What's in our skies."
After listening to this you wonder if the idea of gravity as a thing in itself is just an illusion and the effects of “gravity” are due to something we don’t understand about the other known forces.
My entire family acts as multiple graviton beams, forcing me to drive to their house, have dinner, and sit and watch my teenage nephew open three dozen Christmas presents. The only way I've found to break the forces is to start talking about politics.
As a Military Brat, one thing I witnessed was Military Personnel, Terrified , yelling to Run the Restraints are goin .. lots of quick comments.. then this thing broke loose and just shot straight into the night sky like a magnet repelling it's opposite polarity ... It did not come back down from what I saw and it shot up faster than almost anything I've ever seen.. I was across a field 4x4ing through the woods in a black area... There is alot of crazy things going on at Bases...
@USA#1 !! Yes, and the Preachers Daughter is a Virgin... The Police Chiefs Son isn't a Thief, and the World is Flat.. Take it as you want or don't. I've witnessed some amazing things. I grew up as a Military Brat where NASA, USAF, Private AeroSpace , etc all come together.. That meant Many Good Family Friends and Incredible Mentors over the years.. If you think what I witnessed is so impossible then You couldn't possibly Believe in or Comprehend where Man is Technologically. In the 40s you would have said Space Flight is Crazy talk or Cell Phones.. well thats just Down Right Maaad.. I Tell Ya... You wouldn't believe there are craft that in a bad day , can suck electricity right out of the power grid to gimp home, causing rolling blackouts. Or Craft that look invisible, direct energy weapons that are used pretty frequently and much more.. So you Mock all You want.. Personally, I would have not acted like a prick and maybe asked a question or two or left it alone. But when They prove the World is Round and we are Flying through the Air in Giant Air Planes , everyone is carrying around a phone and computer in their pocket, and we are Launching People into Space... You'll have to Look at Yourself in the Mirror and think about all the people You Crucified and all the witches You Burned.. Then again.. judging from your demeanor, you will probably say.. Yup.. I knew about it all along... Lighten Up. Or why would anyone share information or experiences with You.. Who knows.. You could have asked where and when and do I think that research is still going on in these places.. Its5one thing to see something shoot across the sky while your driving , it's a whole other beast to goto a place where you can see something coming and going or an accident once in awhile that shakes you to your very core.. Treat others as You want them to treat you or just go on about your day. P.s. The World isn't Flat...
It's amazing that we still don't know what gravity is. We can't put it in a jar, we can't paint it red. We can only measure it's effect. Any anti-gravity device will be expertly built but we'll have no idea how or why it works.
Spoiler Alert: We've had anti-gravity technology since 1956. The "government" is keeping it under wraps, however. Want to catch up with the truth that most people are ignorant of? Give me a "click" if you're ready for information that's more important than anti-gravity: including, the simple cure for cancer and the Meaning of Life.....
Possible leads: Zero point energy, quantum foam, vacuum permittivity (ε0), negative energy, negative resistance, E=mc², energy density, inductor properties in electronic circuits, quantum behavior of inductors, relative behavior of differential values (maybe also vectors?) - a loophole of sorts for properties with absolute values to act like negatives, magnetic fields, and superconductors. My take on it is that gravity is associated with mass only due to the potential energy contained within the mass. So instead of taking it in regard to mass, it's the amount of energy within the mass vs. the distance from the average center of mass, vs. the (spherical?) surface area in relation to the radius from the averaged center. And in relation for every interaction it's something like the sum of that effect going each way. Crazy enough how I picture it, I lack the patience for math to put it in more clear terms, but somebody else could take a shot at it from this perspective and see if it goes anywhere. And if it's getting close, it may be interesting to see how some already known constants may wedge in there to make the model balance out.
@@thisistheway96 only super fast spinning black holes are omnidirectional since the singularity cant compress to a single point. Or thats the likely theory. Olso black planets?
Sure boblazars sayings saund like they are true but most of the documentaries bend the truth guite a bit. And there still are meny inconsistensies. (Sorry for bad english)
This is a fascinating subject and what is not so surprising is that the work seems to have gone underground. It will take the birth of another Einstein type of genius to find an answer to what gravity actually is. Imaging the possibilities.
at 0:15 the question is, "Could an apple that falls onto a table and splits into 4 equally sized pieces with surfaces sliced perfectly flat Really Be Possible?"
well, it's called Moscovium, and it was finally synthesized in 2003 and it has none of the properties lazar claimed back in the 1980's. It's also completely useless as it decays less than a second after it's created, so you can't store / keep it. Just like the 2012 end of the world prediction, lazar's claims are all made up fantasy which has given him a massive, free advertising campaign for his business called "United Nuclear"...
this dude has amazing content, his research is so good, everything he has said in this video makes me feel so much like their are some conspiracy's going on
At my 71 years of age I have been there and done that and came to the conclusion, it would be best that certain things that you learn to stay very quiet, remember if the enemy find out what you know from your love ones to your country could be used to destroy anyone, careful, stay quiet and leave longer and in peace.
2001: Scientist given $450,000 grant to study a theoretical anti-gravity drive. 2004: F/A-18 pilot engages an aircraft that seemingly defies gravity and flies faster than any known aircraft. 😳
Nope, juste the same bullshit claims over and over: www.skeptic.com/reading_room/pentagon-ufos-to-the-stars-academy-ttsa-ufo-media-frenzy/ Apparently your supposed anti grav UFOs are just more BS from the modern media business model that must sell BS claims to continue to exist.
Luc Fauvarque That article is fair about what it says about George Knapp, Tom DeLonge, (especially) Jeremy Corbell, et. al., who’ll attribute anything to aliens, but Cdr. Fravor’s encounter and the videos can’t easily dismissed. Fravor didn’t “assume” the disturbance in the water was caused by the TicTac; as he explains in his interview with Joe Rogan, he actually saw it visually erratically flying over it, and after flying closer and getting it to mirror him, he saw it disappear instantly, and 30 seconds later the USS Princeton saw it on radar 60 miles away. Fravor also explains what’s going on in the targeting pod footage of it taken by a pilot who took off after him. He said it’d have shown an exhaust plume if it was any sort of aircraft, and while the pod’s range does change right before it takes off, Fravor says it’d still have to be going faster than anything we have to do that (BTW Joe mentions how Mick West, who pointed out the range change, finds every excuse to rationally explain something. But I’d trust someone who uses and knows how this equipment works over someone hell-bent on disproving everything). As for it being a bird or something, Fravor could visually see it was about 40 ft. long, and was actively jamming the radar of F-18 that got the video of it, so it was more than likely something technological. As for the Gimbal video, the “aura” likely being an artifact is irrelevant. What is relevant is this thing was hovering in place for hours, totally resistant to the wind, something no plane, bird, balloon, etc. can do. As for the lack of “overwhelming video, photographic, and instrumental evidence of them” and the question “doesn’t the Navy have any cameras, radar and other surveillance equipment?” as the article states, the radar scans literally are “instrumental” evidence of them hanging around “all day.” Fravor also said if something like that appears on a ship’s radar, they really can’t do anything to to look at it closer unless a fighter jet with a camera pod is nearby, which the Gimbal video is, which clearly shows something quite unusual. I’m not saying these things are for sure aliens, but unless there’s some ultra-secret branch of the government that’s testing these things, they can do stuff nothing we have is capable of.
Possible. The rotating or moving body becomes "heavy", which is resolved by STR within relativistic masses. However, if the body is unsymmetrical (quadrupole moment), it loses energy through gravitational waves. Therefore, something that creates a compact feature is being considered and dark matter is the best candidate (for now). However, it is certainly a good idea to take into account your remark, ie the mass and space in the mixer, which induces additional gravity from the deformation of entrainment of space-time.
And also dark matter which keeps the galaxy together. Galexies spins too fast for the amount of gravity the galaxy creates meaning all the stars should 'fling' out of the galaxy like kids getting flung off a merry go round if an adult spins it fast enough. They can calculate the mass of a galaxy and the speed at which it rotates. This is how dark matter was discovered.
@@nvstewart Sure, but it's good to consider other mechanisms that emerge as an alternative to dark matter. It is a spiral structure of the arms, which adheres to its own gravity and equally to the central body. Then it's secondary gravity, etc. It's still under investigation.
Yes, amazing. Thank you so much for your review on anti-gravity possibilities, this is what i wanted, not just videos on "simulating gravity with centrifugal force".
Whoever makes an anti-grav craft would be super rich. Imagine floating down into the parking lot for another day at work. Everybody would be checking you out asking, whoa, how much did that thing cost?
I've always found the concept of gravity control extremely fascinating. I also think it's amazing that we still basically have no idea what gravity is.
The odd thing is that we can measure gravity, and its effects. We can send probes to all the planets using gravity as a means of propulsion and guidance. But all this time nobody knows what gravity really is?
@@kirkjohnson9353 I've had this feeling, that once we figure it out, it's going to be so simple and so obvious it'll be amazing we didn't understand sooner. And also I kind of think when/if we figure out FTL travel, it'll require very little energy. Although... I think my thoughts and ideas have been slightly influenced by the book "Speaker For The Dead". So I'm probably way off.
@Braxton Conley What you described is called a "teleporter" (molecular disassembly in one spot and reassemble in another). Different from using gravity to lift, move, or stop objects.
If gravity really is just the difference in "graviton pressure" by blocking graviton with mass in one direction, then we would need a way to redirect this graviton with energy which does not carry gravity, before they hit the object we want to influence. So we need to block the "up" or generate our own gravitons in the direction of the "down". Since we found gravity waves and neutrinos I am confident that it is possible, but only with more base research in field manipulation and energy transformation.
Nothing pulls you, the earth does not pull, gravity does not exist, it is the subatomic particle AETHER that pushes you towards the magnetism of the earth. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I was wondering about the TR3B astra & was just about to comment. Do you have any vid links on it or literature links that you can point me to? My neighbor used to drive truck & make deliveries to several aerospace companies as well as experimental air force bases located near the everglades & near Kennedy space center (NASA). He claims he's seen the tr3b twice & gave me very vivid descriptions of it.
@@RichardCranium321 Nearly a year ago myself and a friend had one fly low overhead of us in Eastern Montana. It was completely silent and much bigger than I would have imagined. Where we were it was on course for Malmstrom airforce base which was about 75 miles by air.
@@justme-ij2qy Nice! I saw a black triangle 15 years ago, along with a couple other round looking lights. I've been trying to get footage of them! Figured 3 in 1 spot there's a reason they're there.... I saw an odd red flashing light there a few weeks ago. My goal is to record one of those things flying directly over my head, or record one accelerate at impossible speeds :) With the amount of sightings and phones with a camera.... we need more footage!!
@@justme-ij2qy one here was down a remote stretch of alligator alley & yes, it flew silent but moreover, it was moving slowly from east to west & then without spinning & no delay it immediately reversed course & was going back west to east in the same orientation + it didnt make a sound the whole time. What about lights, could you see any clearly to count? I've become very interested in this & I've seen footage of middle East where grunt level soldiers have captured it on film using what looked like some kind of light based particle weaponry to just level entire compounds in milliseconds
@@RichardCranium321 When I first noticed it, it was way off in the distance and the only way that I could tell that something was coming was because stars would disappear and then reappear in a pattern coming towards me. When it got close I could faintly see orange glowing circles underneath it, basically the color of dim red hot metal and when it passed overhead I could clearly make out it's triangular shape. The glowing areas struck me as openings, almost like a type of exhaust or a way of directing thrust/energy. There were no lights on it though.
What is gravity? If our space is spacetime and we visibly see an anomaly in space, then something is dragging the flow of time. Massive objects are simply stealing our time. In any case you massively stole my time with your great RUclips video's, keep up the good work.
I've watched several of your video's. This one motivated me to subscribe. Write a book, I'll buy it. If you are not a PHD or a professor, you should be. You have my attention. Thank you for the enlightenment.
The stats wants a space force so they can control all areas while nobody should control land sea air or space eexcept where they live. If they get their spaceforce were all fucked so if that happens Its just more reason to off politicians
Anti gravity is actually electromagnetic propulsion. That's part of it, the rest is the ability to change the specific gravity of an object so it can be "dialed" to a point where the object can be turned off and still stay at the altitude it was set to without any additional power.
When I hear descriptions or approaches to anti-gravity, I feel as if too many people are missing the plot completely, and it owes to our language. You hear discussions about cancelling or repelling gravity, but that approach stems from viewing gravity as a force to be repelled or cancelled. Gravity is actually just the bending of space-time, and an anti-gravity machine should be approached as the goal of re-straightening that space-time. When people stop fiddling with spinners and chemical reactions and the like and begin approaches targeting the shape of space, then true lack-of-gravity can exist. I expect this to eventually not only happen, but become fairly commonplace, as we strongly need a local area unaffected by the gravity of earth and stars for quite a lot of research to be done and for a lot of fact-checking over previous research where we might find new behavior in elementary particles and reformulate their descriptive equations such that gravity is properly sorted out.
As I was watching this, an idea occurred to me. Most of the existing antigravity concepts involve some form of mechanical rotation, or electromagnetism, or both, to create an antigravity effect. But what if.....what if the problem is thinking in terms of ANTIgravity? Could we instead think in terms of creating a gravitational field around the air/space craft itself, but a controllable field, one that could be directed so that it could be offset from the vehicle's center of gravity, thus causing it to literally fall towards equilibrium in any direction the operators wish? The potential here is that anyone inside the craft would not feel any G force whatsoever, no matter what kind of insane maneuvers the craft performs. Essentially, using directed gravitational beaming, the craft and its occupants would exist within their own gravitational bubble. This would also have the effect of slowing down time within the craft, relative to the external universe. If this could actually be done, what we'd have would essentially be a form of warp drive. It would require a lot of power to produce a gravitational field strong enough to achieve truly spectacular performance, but it would also be highly efficient. No rockets, no jets, no huge fuel load to burned and hurled out the Craft's rear. The power source would almost certainly have to be nuclear, since that is the best way we know to get massive power from a relatively small amount of fuel that lasts a very long time. Right. So how do we produce this self contained gravitational bubble? I keep thinking about gravitational lensing, the phenomenon in which the gravitational field around large bodies like stars actually bends light. Einstein's principle of universal covariance says that everything has an effect on everything else, and Newton agrees, "for every action, an equal and opposite reaction." So. Gravitation bends light. Can light bend gravitation? Meaning, is it possible to warp spacetime with light? Not just any light, this would require extreme LIGHT DENSITY using the very upper limit possible in lasers. The idea is, even the light from the sun, intense as it is, is not coherent nor is it highly concentrated in a small space. It is spread out, so its effect on spacetime (hence gravitation) is very minute. This is rather like the gravitational interaction between a planet and a 170 pound astronaut on a spacewalk gone bad. Earth's gravitational field is pulling at the astronaut, but the astronaut is also pulling at the earth. The huge mass difference means the earth wins, and the astronaut plummets to his doom. But. The Earth moves too. Just a TINY bit, maybe no more than the breadth of a quark. Photons are massless, though, so how could they warp spacetime to create gravity? See, I literally am thinking this through as I write, so I'm none too sure that this idea is going anywhere but down the toilet with all the other waste material. Even so, I keep going back to universal covariance. Everything in the universe affects everything else. Change value A, then value B is also altered. So is value X. And value J. So if we have super high powered laser light, generated by nuclear fusion & packed into a small a space as possible, going around rings which encircle our hypothetical air/space craft, with no gaps whatsoever between the rings which cover the entire craft, would the sheer light intensity at maximum density affect spacetime? I think...I THINK🤣 that it might, because spacetime affects light. And, if we take the view that all particles are actually distortions or twists in a fundamental spacetime field, then it surely would. So yeah. I just gave myself about 20 years of work to do🤣😹
Dude ... magnets ! The Earth has a magnetic force and what happens when two magnets are pushed together at the negative or positive ends ? They repel each other. Is there a machine or way to increase the magnetic force in am object ? So in theory a craft could defy gravity and if you could increase turn up the strength of the magnet you could use it to travel in a certain direction ! Work smarter, not harder. Also, you want to verify the information you base your theory on . They say that we are on a spinning ball in space which is not accurate.
@@edwardfletcher7790 We currently can't. There was a time when we couldn't create an electromagnetic field or a nuclear reactor either, but that did not stop us from trying until we finally succeeded. There is ongoing research into gravitational propulsion by NASA and the US military. The US Navy, after the Tic Tac event became known worldwide, admitted that UAP's are real physical objects that appear to fly using technology that manipulates gravity and inertia. Science has a history of claiming that things are impossible and then uncovering new data that proves the 'impossible.' I think it likely (if we do not allow our 'leaders' to 'lead' us into oblivion) that we will develop gravitational warp drive sometime within the next 50 years.
Professor Eric Laithwaite is absolutely amazing. I would suggest to people of all skill levels to watch some of his lectures and presentations. He is both incredibly skilled and amazingly entertaining, and I have no doubt that he would have had a very popular youtube channel or even TV show had the opportunities been available to him. I'm a postgraduate physicist, I love his work. Some of his work was directed towards children, even if you don't want to learn he is still incredibly entertaining. I can't say enough good things about the man and frankly wish I had the opportunity to meet him before he passed away.
So, when he (youtuber) says that in the 80's and 90's we actually investigated gyroscopic thrust. We didn't. Scientists just abandoned it because they assumed it was 'impossible', and the clip shown in the beginning of the video was, for example, never explained.
@@battmann5083 I've researched the Sandy Kidd device, and no, no serious research was conducted. It was figuratively just dropped like yesterday's trash because there's a lot on the line in terms of career for scientists today. The only ones willing to look at it are people in powerful positions, where they really can't "lose" because they're at the top. Eric Laithwaite (seen in the video) did have a brief look at it, but ultimately he only focused on his own gyro experiments, failed, and then died. Literally. Sandy's device was never properly researched, and in a few years the 'hype' surrounding it disappeared, and the inventor became bitter and basically never recovered. He's pushing 80+ now.
@@battmann5083 Either way it's technically a lie to say that it was "investigated and they discovered it didn't work", which is what was said in this video. The only way to find out if it actually works or not is to actually investigate it, not stand and look at it and say "Wow, interesting", as you contemplate what's for tomorrow's breakfast.
The us navy has their own "ufos." Google Salvatore Pais patents. They're not even classified. The patents describe tech almost identical to what Bob Lazar described working on in the 80s. Different power source, same basic design and function.
I bet the Navy has more interesting classified information than in all of Steven Greer's "Vault" (see "Unacknowledged"). As far back and further than Tesla, the Navy was involved in some really super high tech craziness. Even the details of the Philadelphia Experiment, even minus some weird disinformation, has some incredible implications. USOs are all over and travelling at speeds that can't be understood, yet today I believe most of them are ours. Aristotle, yes THE Aristotle, the man that originated the great taxonomy of all things, a superb observer and an incredibly deep thinker saw something he described as a very large shield, fly in from the sky and dive straight into the Mediterranean. He set up a submerged observation station to keep an eye out for another one. A round shiny shield is a great description of a flying saucer. Having struggled to follow the enormous thoughts of Aristotle in philosophy grad school, I can't think of a more trustworthy observation. There's that case that's been public. A saucer crashes into the water near a navy vessel. The vessel anchored over the USO and sent divers down. They listened to the goings on inside the craft for over a WEEK before the craft whirled up and moved out of the way of the navy and then shot out of the water. I imagine there is a ton of classified information that would be fascinating. If they've got one instance of a long term stake out of a live alien craft, they've probably got several. Some channels on RUclips shown tracking of sea floor objects, miles in diameter, moving around. I think that'd be the best way to recover treasure but would it need to be so big? No. Another billion dollar idea from me on a random thought. I think my last one was an international joint operation to clean our plastic out of the oceans and produce a type of Trex lumber with help fibers instead of sawdust like Trex lumber. The lumber lasts forever and is expensive. This new kind would require some chemistry and the product could save countless trees and finance a small portion of the recovery effort but the biggest payoff would be the give the US a better reputation worldwide. After invading innocent nation's, creating millions of refugees, over 100,000 dead, mostly their police officers, who are all people whom over a billion Muslims will never forget like we surely have, plus Guantanamo, speaking of flush and forget, held without charge, bail, trial or anything. Kidnappees. seizure of humans, citizens of other nations in most cases, forgotten by no one, except everyone American, the perpetrator, and Trump, no explanation required... Anyway, if we must fund the operation then so be it. We had no trouble coming up with 3 trillion bucks it took to kill people in other countries randomly out of misplaced revenge. In any case, we may have to be yelled at and just listen, an uncomfortable situation, but we must stone in some way and healing the planet in a tiny way is just the first step in international cooperation to pick up our trash. The sea is not a trash can. It's not an all-you- can-eat buffet either. Anyway, lumber that lasts like Trex but made by cleaning the planet and other sources of free plastic is a billion dollar idea. I'd love a fence I don't have to replace with fresh trees every 15 years would be a change with vast benefits everywhere. I got how I got sidetracked. Oh yeah, the navy? UFOs? Their secrets could make the cleanup go much smoother surely. Maybe it'd be a waste of classified capability, for the next stupid idea involving revenge overseas, from any retarded president, if that's something the US public really wants. I say that because we're supposed to be a democracy. Do you who felt the loss of young people on 911 convince you to kill 40 times as many other people's children? When those people had no part in the hijackings? All the hijackers died in the crash, in case that wasn't clear. oh, and they were Saudis. What am I.....? Clean the oceans, mend relations, save sea turtles and birds, smile ... "click"
*One needs to define gravity first: Gravity is simply the electrons in elements ALL traveling in an elliptical orbit. If you get enough mass together the elliptical orbit of of many septillion electrons crates gravity. On the surface of a black hole (A sphere of tightly packed neutrons) massive amounts of electrons crowd on the surface unable to pass into the tightly packed neutron mass. The elliptical orbit of these electrons could be measured in centimeters or or even meters and create massive gravity. Why is an elliptical neutron producing an invisible force? It's not the elliptical orbit but the differential in speed. The electron moves very slowly away from the element and on the flight back down to the element speeds up immensely. This acceleration towards the element creates the gravitational field. To control gravity one simply needs to control the flight of electrons and their shape and their orbit which is not so simple. If we ever do create anti-gravity it will take as much power in electricity as a rocket engine expels in chemical energy. That law can never be broken. It takes raw energy to defy gravity and in the future we will discover a device that will utilize these large amounts of energy necessary to power it.*
Yes, and gravity is electromagnetism. You create the proper field resonating at a specific frequency that cancels out the frequency of earth's magnetic field. It's how all your UFO's operate. It's rather simple really.
@@A.Martin Ultimately humanity has put the cart before the horse in their search for the cause of this phenomena. Order of discovery: 1)Things fall down 2) things in lower GPE pass through time slower. This sequence of observations in combination with evolutionary disposition towards the affects of gravity biases it as the cause (and the seeking of the agent responsible i.e. graviton), not the consequence of other more tangible (yet minute) phenomena i.e. time dilation. The derivation of The Propagator that includes the possibility frontier to accommodate regions of different time dilation (i.e. regions of lower/higher GPE) should show when evaluating the path integral, a propensity towards the "slower" time dilation regions... i.e. "it fell down". This same tool set will be useful in explaining weirdness when that possibility frontier includes regions where there is no future outside once crossed... i.e. crossing an event horizon.
humanhiveanomaly “At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in the comment section is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.”
A damn race of Traitors is out there paying artists like this to advertise what doesn't exist, it's a way of distraction for the Humanity. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Spoiler Alert: We've had anti-gravity technology since 1956. The "government" is keeping it under wraps, however. Want to catch up with the truth that most people are ignorant of? Give me a "click" if you're ready for information that's more important than anti-gravity: including, the simple cure for cancer and the Meaning of Life.....
@@tomrhodes1629 I'm more interested in essential oils that keep big pharma from touching my home-schooled measles-riddled child-experiment. Do you have any of that?
Yea true but you need like quadrillion pounds of pressure for it to work at just above 32° Fahrenheit. So is superconducting really here or did we just discover its sister who we can't be with also?
"Antigravity" does not exist and never will be. Unless you're the master of time and dealing with the antimatter that would result. All that remains is the expansion of space through dark energy, but even that does not interfere with gravity and is unusable on a small scale.
Atleast you understand that also, not many people understand that Mercury works well with electromagnetism, or the fact that when both combined, it defies physics....there's even a patent for it also
@lee morse aren't you a charming one, obviously you haven't seen it listed, literally type it in Google you nob head! Also you moron, each listed Patent that has been made also got abandoned because of the theoretical physics of it being explained, next time choose your words wisely and research before making yourself look like a complete idiot, all the patents that have been abandoned are all listed publicly. Patents identification number. *CN102761296A *US20120092107A1 *CA2831299A1 *CN102092254A
@lee morse you're telling me to grow up yet you whine and call me stupid, obviously you have no respect, just a common tool who wasn't raised properly by your parents, such shame you bring yourself child. Also that technology isn't ready for the public convention of technology dim wit, if I was a politician, I would ban such technology and put it to use only in the military 🤭🤭🤭 Seriously though, such tech isn't ready for a commercial scale and if you believe it simply can't be manufactured, I'm deadset sure the military will have it first before the rest of the world does... besides we have NDA's for a reason.
"I have created an anti gravity device"
US: military:
"It's mine now, also it does not exist"
Of course, it doesn’t exist. Don’t You know, the gravity is created by mass?
YDDES Of course there is the missing piece of the puzzle of what it is in that mass that creates the gravity in the first place. Maybe there are a few that have cracked the code and got buried in the bureaucratic red tape or buried all together for "reasons of national security" or whatever other reasons they can dream up. Not unlike what you have done but can't shed any further light on I'll bet.
Don't get me wrong I am a skeptic when it comes to things like flat earth (because it's stupid low hanging fruit and easily debunked) but some things are not so easily explained away. There are precedents that are official yet not explained, but also aren't acknowledged by skeptics in any way shape or form.
I always challenge the skeptics to reply but they always decline, it doesn't seem right to me. I make this type of comment about once a week in much larger threads fyi, and still nothing.
@@YDDES
*CITATION NEEDED*
behemuth would you rather have a greedy business owner who ordered the assisination of his partner to gain so much money he controls the world
@@itachi_uchiha1538 Thats a pretty movie-esque hypotechical. It's almost like it is completely made up nonsense that never has and doubtfully ever will occur in human history.
Also, I would not trust the US military any more than i would trust the Chinese military.
So Ning Li: this is a way to make anti gravity
5 years later: nope, doesn't work
leaves University and starts company of the "thing that doesn't work".
Gets awarded grant from defense for the same "thing that doesn't work".
Nowhere to be seen afterwards...
Have you checked Area 51?
it may not work for anti-gravity.... but she clearly found another use for it. ;)
If it is storing energy, the DoD would be interested. It could be used as a non chemical battery, even if it has no effect on gravity at all. That potentially sidesteps the theoretical maximum we are running into with regards to chemical energy storage. A battery with 10x the storage of current batteries would permit aircraft with longer range and no infra red signature.
That is even before we consider the destructive uses of it. Conservation of energy means that the energy stored is dissipated rapidly if confinement is lost. Unlike a conventional battery with two chemicals separated by a barrier, this has spinning bits kept from crashing by cold and quantum mechanics. If it breaks, it goes bang. 10x current battery storage would make it double up as an explosive with more energy than anything currently available. The energy not being chemical also means we don't run into chemistry based temperature limits. Get it to 100x storage and most of the energy would be X-rays. That could potentially replace a fission device as the primary in a hydrogen bomb. There goes all the nuclear safeguards, as those rely on limiting fission primaries.
If they have demonstrated a way to pump energy into a system that doesn't have well understood theoretical limits, the DoD will put money into finding those limits. The cost of letting somebody else find something amazing first with regards to energy storage is way too high a risk.
Given the number of bullshit science "discoveries" your DoD has funded, I wouldn't be surprised to discover it doesn't work, period.
Also: when the military find a game changer, they use it. _Always._ The fact they didn't speaks volumes. It's a dead end, like all those other "secret projects" that led to nothing.
@@agsystems8220 I was going to rant about this underrated comment, then I saw it's posted 10 mins ago.
So yeah. This event doesn't prove the scientist found anti-gravity, but it proves she found something of great potential value. I'm sure we will find about it a couple of decades when it gets declassified and put into smarphones.
NASA: Whatcha got there?
Dr Ning Li: A smoothie
DoD: *I've come for your pickle*
An infinite improbability drive!
$450,000
Walking in a park
Nasa- Never A Straight Answer
Actually enjoyed the relatively accurate explanation of current theories. Hate when people assume they are “proven” generally just because of mathematics.
Identifying areas of science:
If it is green and wiggles, it is Biology.
If it is smelly, it is Chemistry.
If it does not work, it is Physics.
If it is absolute and yet somehow exceedingly vague and fluffy, it is mathematics.
While the general public may make such assumptions (and those public assumptions are rarely based on math), physicists do not. Physicists never assume that a prevailing theory is the gospel or that it is set in stone. That is simply not how they think. At the same time however they also realize some of these theories can be extremely useful even before they are proven to be 100% correct. In fact theoretical physics is responsible for many technological breakthroughs which have in turn brought us many of our modern conveniences.
As for some lay people insisting that some theories have been proven to be completely correct when they have not, this can definitely be annoying at times. Still, this is not nearly as annoying as the people on the flip side of that coin. I’m referring of course to people who are so ignorant and pig headed that they will even deny that natural laws are proven facts. For example they might insist that perpetual motion - and thus energy from nothing - is possible when in fact it is not possible in this universe as such a thing would violate the laws of physics (laws, not theories). These people are not necessarily all completely unintelligent of course but rather the are just highly irrational and because of this their opinions are always based on what they need to believe rather than on the facts. These types also tend to be conspiracy theorists more often than not. In any case there is no point in trying to reason with them and trying to do so is just an exercise in futility.
@@SLOBeachboy finally someone who knows what he is talking about! kudos!
Thank you for treating this subject with the gravity it deserves.
Wow
I bet this comment will attract many likes in the futur
Get out.
Ha !
These are, indeed, weighty matters to consider. For some reason I find them quite attractive. I am however, at a loss as to why I keep falling for them.
Department of Defense: "Oh.. Whatcha got there."
Inventor: "I just invented this anti-gravity device."
....
**Inventor goes missing and stops posting publically**
Media (on command from DoD): "Too bad we can't verify these results."
Edit: haha, thanks for the likes and comments guys!
You don't have to be Einstein to figure that one out!
Typically when a scientist's research disappears from public journals and universities is either one, they gave up and there experiments are failures. Two, there funding gets cut and the research projects are cancelled. And finally, if they are successful and they get Dod approval, there research will go dark and become classified depending upon the invention and whether or not the military wants to reveal certain military technological advancements to the public. They usually reveal "new military technologies" at a time when they have developed a classified technology that makes the older one obsolete. When the media reports a story about DARPA developing some new technology, it's probably already 20 years old or more.
@@alphega1983 “There” means in that place: We drove there early in the morning. “Their” is a possessive form of they: They gave their earnings to charity. “They're” is a contraction of they+are: When Grandma and Grandpa get here, they're going to take us out to lunch.
@@alphega1983 Another angle on that though is that it is much easier to convince DARPA grant reviewers of things than domain experts like other scientists, so a lot of shady operators, when their research looks like it is about to collapse publicly, stop publishing and convincing the DoD to fund them. As long as you give them convincing powerpoint presentations every year or so and have a good personal relationship with someone in the department, you can fund a small lab for a LONG time and not produce any results.
People put WAY too much faith in the professionalism and planning of DARPA. It is mostly rotating fiefdoms, vague calls for research, and blocks of money given out to what sounds interesting to people unqualified to evaluate feasibility but who really like meetings and paperwork.
@@alphega1983 Or they get put into a bag that gets put into he ground, but hey, we never know.
Was already solved with buttered toast taped to the back of a cat.
Purr-petual motion...
radwizard - By far the best comment. 😄👍
I do wonder, if the experiments on gravity in CERN are successful, will that mean a toast made of antimatter would actually land on the "right" side?
@@slyseal2091 It might do but only because it's that 'I can't believe it's not butter' inferior substitute.
If you add an additional openface sandwich and an open book then you have enough stators to make a perpetual rotational energy device
Thank you. Rare to find a presenter as good as you. Understand gravity before ever finding antigravity.
1:Discovers possible anti-gravity options.
2: Puts 'new' research out saying there is no anti-gravity.
3: Opens her own company and calls it *AC Gravity LLC*
Nothing suspicious here at all.
And then disappeared forever!
@@Rafayel06 With $400k
And then NASA starts: stops it all. Then Boeing starts looking into it: shut down. Black project? No comment.
Not suspicious at all.
exactly, I know someone that disagrees with this baloney sandwish..Antigravity has been explored already...Einstein was wrong in many issues inc Spooky action at a distance, which is called Entanglement...too much baloney sandwich in physics taught in school..Antigravity in itself is one of many terms explored already..How about air cavity resonance instead? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov
Sounds like somebody got a job at Area 51.... (or wherever the really cool stuff actually is, if Area 51 is just the decoy site)
[Gravity]: What goes Up, must come Down . . .
[US National Debt]: *hold my beer* . . .
That cant go up forever either. Leads to a large collapse
@@goldengun9970 Bet
@@lordinquisitorjohn1357 yes john. You can just create $ forever as much as you like. Even though every other time in human history it has failed this time it won't. Of course
@@goldengun9970 *sigh* It's just a joke man.
@@lordinquisitorjohn1357 i wish it was
Science: antigravity could open the gate to space exploration
Boeing: Let's steer enemy missiles
There is no gravity in space. There is tons of electricity and electromagnetism, however.
Roland Deschain That is actually false, as there are gravimetric forces in space. There is gravimetric forces everywhere, no matter how small, due to how gravity is defined in both newtonian physics and physics surrounding gravity by Einstein.
@@isorokudono wtf are you talking about? What do you think moves the planets?
Roland Deschain
Wait. What?
What is holding the entire universe in place?
How are we still alive?
@@isorokudono yep, I can see the earth sailing into open space now 🌎😂😉👍
Don't forget the earth is flat as well 🤣👏
I'm calling it: the recently released videos of UFOs are top secret antigravity machines made by Ning Li for the Department of Defense.
but if the feds have admitted they’ve been documenting them since at least the 70’s, who knew about the tech 20 years before Ning Li?
Oh I bet the department of defense and Boeing DARPA but they're working on it
@@millhouse782 Superconductors have been around since the 1950s, do you think nobody bothered to see if they affected gravity untill a few years ago..... nay
same here dude
This is literally what Bob Lazar has been saying since the day he came out with his claims. That the craft that the government have use some kind of anti-gravity technology powered by element 115.
"[Rockets] are nothing more than a chemical reaction"
Rocket engineers: "Guess i'll just die"
Dark matter is a funding scam!!!
Nathan Toms correct
What about that released videos by the NAVY of UFO's? That looked like anti gravity to me.
The pilots seemed shocked in the video, at what they were seeing. These people are highly trained to identify other aircraft.
A complex reaction which involves fluid dynamics, pressure mediation and changes etc etc.
@@nathanieltoms7733 what makes you think that?
"I have created an anti gravity device"
*Homeland security would like to know your location*
They already know.
more like, H S get down and shut up, in the middle of the night after the power randomly cuts out
@@allenjenkins7947 : The interagency memo was circulated already.
Refer to NSA doc 20191108-0735DC3Gw463rAsz362178054447-aqc32
THEY KNOW YOUR LOCATION....THAT'S EASY
@@allenjenkins7947 Next: "They think they know. That's just a decoy. I have developed a teleportation device." XD
It sounds like any time we hear about scientists getting close to discovering a method of simulating anti-gravity both the project and scientist go dark and are never heard about again. Gee, I can only imagine why this is.
Odds are their projects failed and that was that.
Like an old girlfriend, you never see them again.
@@Saugaverse True, every year thousands of people "get close" to discovering a free energy device, only for the project and creator to go dark for the same reason. It failed! ;)
@@HPPalmtopTube No such thing as free energy, but yes a few drastically novel energy sources/harvesters are researched in secret I believe. We live in an amazing world, the truth is out there.
Like bionic arms but actually getting closer, also aerospike engine, succeded but never used since it isnt efficient because of the weight...
Also random, do yoi think quantum computers will really get close?
Jeffrey050711 alien abduction
"I have discovered anti gravity!"
_Later_
"No, no I have not! Just... just forget about it"
That's a way to avoid accidents I guess.
You are like that "Dizzy" character. He discovered Anti-Gravity after falling out of a tree and breaking his leg. He has been "anti-gravity" ever since. Perhaps the men in black threw him off the tree?
*has promising results*
"nevermind guess it was nothing"
*goes private, gets Defense money, goes quiet but still operational*
Sounds like it was something
no necessarily. the U.S. needs to research based off even the remote possibility of there being 'something' to ensure its national defence.
@@davemustaine7504 national defense from whom
@@Krystalmyth the offense.........
Funding by the US Govt is proof that this does not and will not work.
Anti Gravity: *Exists*
DoD: "Not anymore."
Star trek: exists
CBS: NOT ANY MORE.
@@JeanLucCaptain Damn right. I boycotted CBS so they'd know not to take Advantage of us loyal trek fans but I was sad to hear so many weak willed people gave in and forked over CBS's subscription fee just to watch 1 tv series in real time. They couldnt even wait a few years to see it free thru syndication. They may live long but with such weak wills, they clearly will not prosper. CBS U make Ferengis look honest!
The DOD are the main ones creating antigravity ships.(* cough the TR3B couch *) That's where all the "black money" is going to.
DoD has killed more promising technology than Google.
@@jayyyzeee6409 That's not really fair. Microsoft squashed MANY promising tech companies in their day. Even more than IBM + Apple combined.
5:20
Sounds like she was figuring it out and her project went top secret..
and / or KIA
@@gamaximusaurelius8969 Why would she be killed?
@@gamaximusaurelius8969 KIA lol what? First of all in the military in assassinations we say 'liquidated' or 'dispatched', second if she was on to something they would recruit her and definitely not kill her.
@@rollog1248 Term fits the purpose. on other hand do you really think the gov going to hire everyone who comes up with an idea like that and gives a nice fat big pay check with a Porsche and villa on Malibu?? u must be naive mate. also, why hire if they already have the tech?? Can u prove the opposite?
Tech like that would totally ruin the known economy. They not gonna give a chance to leak information to foreign forces therefore she is highly likely a liability.thats why...
@@rollog1248 Firstly, it's concerning that the military has more than one word for assassination. Secondly, if they already had the technology, they wouldn't want or need somebody else coming up with it.
In the late 60s too early '70s my dad was studying electronics for the military they were using it to project variations in radar signals used at the time to protect B-52 bombers over Vietnam. He mentioned to me that there was a story about a device that could be attached to equipment to make it lighter and more easily moved. We hear a lot of stories and come in contact with many things throughout our lives.
The operative word is “story”. I heard lots of stories in the Army.
@@BrjanBuckmaster yes, I'm with you, but I find it amazing how many stories turn out to be true 10 years down the line.
@@derrillyager7946 Well, any story that implies the existence of anti gravity will not turn out to be true - ever.
@@BrjanBuckmaster if you would have asked anyone about atomic energy 500 year’s ago he would have called you crazy. We don’t know what can be done in 500 year’s from today. The possibilities are endless.
@@Lion_Hamza The possibilities may be endless but not anti gravity. It doesn’t exist and will never exist. Just like perpetual motion.
I’m a simple man. I see a new curious droid video, I click on it. In all seriousness, you’ve been an inspiration. I’ve been watching your videos for years at this point. As a scientist, I’ve always loved your content. And as now being part of the space program, your videos have a different weight and relevancy
Gravity explained here (this is not a joke): ruclips.net/video/NTpytbccqgs/видео.html Do you know this stuff in the space program?
@@scottmcrae7410 Lol
Ning Li was last seen flying a Tic tac shaped UFO off the coast of San Diego.
Alabama Woman leads F-18s on “UFO chase”
She was also seen at a zoo in China, munching on bamboo .. Oh that was Ling-Ling! So sorry.
Let me guess...it tasted like mint?
Not this again.
@@thememoryhole9355 Racist morons everywhere..
"We don't know what gravity is..."
It's a heavy subject, man... :)
pun intended? yeah, must be weighty discussion
I see what you did there , I give your joke 9.81/10
That's deep.
@Beumadine Sweevy Nice copypasta m8
VERY!!
This is a well researched and good presentation. Thanks so much for posting it.
"Since 2001 she has effectively dissapeared"
*Tin foil hats begin to quiver*
lol....hhhmmmmm?
I mean, come on, you cant say thats not weird . figures out gravity then disappeared.
@@Bloodgt3 I was saying WHAT !, because I didn't understand shit he was saying....lol, But the disappearance doesn't surprise me. She's maybe working on a new weapon to kill people right now. For the Gov. no less.
"Since 2001 she has effectively dissapeared" .... suspicious....or a terminal case of "What the hell was I drinking?"
@@dumptrump3788 MAYBE BOTH
My physics teacher told us that mankind already have anti gravity power :
The more mass a person has, the less attractive they are.
It would seem on the face of it humans have had it in the past if the hindu sacred literature is anything to go by. And it seems that it is. As a concept it should be possible using very high end super conductors and super magnets. It would be necessary to produce power of a high amount in a very small limited space using a mercury ion generator of some kind as the sanskrit literature writes about this concept. Its a matter of harnessing negative and positive effects of magnetism.
That’s fucked up and it’s not even funny
Hahah okie dokie
LEELe hahaha okie dokie
@@destineyrodgers1733 YOU MUST BE A FATTY !!
To quote James Brown “Gravity. The Big G, got a hold on me”. He was onto something.
No. He was “on” something 😂
_"Gravity. The Big G, got a hold on me"_ isn't accurate, which was one of the problems with Newtonian gravity. According to Newton, if the sun instantaneously winked out of existence, the Earth would immediately careen out of orbit. Both light an gravity are extremely fast... however, we know through observation and experiment that neither is instantaneous; both travel at 299,792,458 m/s.
Scott McLennan 🤣 ‘Brother is saying something here!’
Christopher Noel so you’re telling me James Brown was possibly on the wrong track with his theories?
But Bob Marley expanded on the concept....
"Every little Action... Deserves a Reaction."
Gotta give it to you, you have a great narrative voice
Yeap, the voice alone made me subscribe
Paul’s shirt actually has anti-gravity capability.
Anty gravity is probably
the only way to create the
force needed to reach, a
unbelievable speed. Never
possible for many reasons.
There's a giant pile of questions that need answers
But clarity it's hiding within.
Cause it's repulsive?
@@alliedvera4960 exactly.
He legally has to wear the shirt due to legal reason. He is a noted illegal drag racer but he has no car yet races drag cars. Crazy I know but he runs at a top speed of 126mph with unrivaled acceleration if he did not have that shirt drivers wouldnt know it was really him and they would therefore jack him in the neck with a 2by4.
Good day all
I LOVE his shirt....maybe its a time-warp-portal-device
Back in the 80’s everything was more “heavy”
Except the youth
illusions77 why is that? Is there something wrong with the earths gravitational pull?
Except for the hair.
Back in the 80’s gravity had a different value other than 9.8ms, Thant made things less or more heavy. ESP during exam times :)
@illusions77 Nice Back to the Future reference/pun!
That story about 'Ning Li' and her research is scektch as hell
I remember reading about Ning Li afew years ago. She just disappeared and never heard of again. Crazy story!
I’ve never heard of her, but I had heard of Podkletnov. I didn’t realize their stories were so similar. Might have been onto something.
I wear sketcher sneakers. I hope they don't disappear me too.
looks like she pocketed the money. I mean if the government comes around and offers you a lot money for research that in the end will amount to nothing anyway, you'd still want the money lol
@@carlosandleon if only girl clothes had pockets. Most are just flaps for show or tiny pockets just large enough to fit a single square wrapped condom. You think we enjoy having to carry around our cute designer purses? You're right, we do! 😜
Speaking of sci fi travel. I wonder what a warp would look like? Would this space ship just disappear in thin air as it enters the fourth dimension? Or would it disappear in some direction? Or a portion of it disappearing before another part does? What would it visually look like if it could be seen at all?
In the summer of 1967, the Rice University Physics Dept. sent a backyard inventor to me at Shell Pipeline Corp. to evaluate his supposed antigravity device. The demo device was made largely of Plexiglas and powered by compressed air. The theory was that acceleration of the air stream would "induce" a static gravitational effect, visible by the motion of small balls. The embarrassing thing was, it seemed to work as advertised! A back-of-the-envelope calculation showed that any genuine effect along those lines should have not have been detectable. We hypothesized several causes for the observed effect. After some work in the machine shop and a couple of tries, we were able to track the effect down to leakage of turbulent flow within the air stream. Nice try, but no cigar.
Betteridge's law of headlies: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no"
Yep. On youtube, pretty much always.
Idk, I got a "maybe, we don't know yet" from this video.
Can any headline ending in a question mark be answered with a no?
Paradoxically, you've broken the 'law'.
For science topics, that law should be reformulated to "Possibly until we have information. But not now".
I tried to listen to the video, but was mesmerized by his shirt.
That shirt right?if he wasn't smart we just laugh at him 😁😅
He does wear some wild ones, huh:)?
I think its fractal
I want it. Whhere could i get it, i wonder?
lol i didn't even realize his shirt till i read this comment had to go back to see what the u were talking about
They never had a problem with this on Star Trek.
Of course not, they had good story writers.
When a scientist working for DoD quietly "disappears", it means they discovered something very useful.
billyman ; there is a high possibility of that.
Or that they discovered something that could be useful but the DoD doesn't want to take the risk of further research being seen by the public.
@@illusions77 Yep, it could be anything, not necessarily antigravity. How many discoveries are accidental?
You have nailed it my friend.
Usually it just means the researcher pocketed most of the cash after he or she came to the conclusion their idea failed.
Thank you for getting right to it, no ads.
The more I watch Curious Droid, *_the more I like it_*
Excellent presentation. This is very educational and deserves to be widely viewed.
Anti-gravity?? Actually, I’m PRO-gravity. Helps keep me from floating away.
Ok boomer (;
@@syaondri Use a balloon. Duh.
Gravity kills!!!
syaondri, if you plan on floating away, make sure you have oxygen handy for your trip
Nabre Labre, that depends.. gravity on Earth saves lives. Gravity in a black hole ends lives.
Best video on "antigravity". No BS just the science. Thank you.
If some kind of anti-gravity device or engine were discovered, you can bet on it that we'd be the very last to know - if it all.
The government has had it for years. Just because msnbc hasn't told us about it, doesnt mean it doesn't exist.
Uh.....so you think people wouldn't be climbing over themselves to make a fortune on such a discovery? Yea, that's likely....
@Agent J Right. Why do I let myself get sucked into these things ha ha ha
@1234 Can you tell me what causes the Tajmar effect in rotating near-superconducting metals? Do you think it is a symptom of the Casimir effect, composite bosons interacting with gravitomagnetic fields, complex gyroscopic procession and vibrational error, or interactions with the recently confirmed Higgs?
When you push a Megajoule per microsecond through superconducting discs, what particle exactly allows some of that energy to travel through blocks of lead, if at all? (You can find a video on this one)
If we can ignore the UFO-Mania campaigns, and think rationally for ourselves, we could certainly get a lot of individuals studying these materials. We need a lot more yes or no answers than what we have, then we can drill down on why. There are many researchers that have been working on this for over 2 or 3 decades now, some with more or less success and attention to detail. One that seemed to believe what he said on television shows was Eugene Podkletnov, but his dishonesty or irrationality got him expelled from his institution. It appears that he was trying to explain flux pinning or induced diamagnetism in place of gravitational shielding, but the jury of peers is still out, and his 1997 comments are still a mystery.
6Beers&1Waitress The Germans were experimenting with it since the 1930s. The TR-3B is the first known anti gravity vehicle the US has developed. Today we have the Black Manta. Take a look at Bob Lazar on RUclips. The Black Manta is discussed in detail by industrialsurrealism.com. "What's in our skies."
After listening to this you wonder if the idea of gravity as a thing in itself is just an illusion and the effects of “gravity” are due to something we don’t understand about the other known forces.
Does my mother-in-law count?
Because when she leaves after holidays I no longer feel pinned to the ground with a rhino sitting on me.
Hahahaha... Classic.
diGritz1 same here....
My entire family acts as multiple graviton beams, forcing me to drive to their house, have dinner, and sit and watch my teenage nephew open three dozen Christmas presents. The only way I've found to break the forces is to start talking about politics.
Test pilot in a broomstick factory by any chance?
Xanax = anti gravity (mother in law variant 🤣)
Gravity has somthing to do with vodka.. After 2 shots i feel like gravity is increased by 2 times
Just 2 shots? Get your liver tested buddy
@David Daivdson oh in that case register for a transplant 1st and then get it tested
weakness disgusts me
after 3 shots gravity disappears alltogether
You should try taking two shots from the law, the gravity of the force is over powered
As a Military Brat, one thing I witnessed was Military Personnel, Terrified , yelling to Run the Restraints are goin .. lots of quick comments.. then this thing broke loose and just shot straight into the night sky like a magnet repelling it's opposite polarity ...
It did not come back down from what I saw and it shot up faster than almost anything I've ever seen..
I was across a field 4x4ing through the woods in a black area...
There is alot of crazy things going on at Bases...
Why should we trust u
Vodka that's why
@USA#1 !! You haven't met any of the military brats I have known. They are nothing like this fantasy you have concocted.
@@tanyahall5072 exactly
@USA#1 !! Yes, and the Preachers Daughter is a Virgin... The Police Chiefs Son isn't a Thief, and the World is Flat..
Take it as you want or don't. I've witnessed some amazing things. I grew up as a Military Brat where NASA, USAF, Private AeroSpace , etc all come together.. That meant Many Good Family Friends and Incredible Mentors over the years.. If you think what I witnessed is so impossible then You couldn't possibly Believe in or Comprehend where Man is Technologically.
In the 40s you would have said Space Flight is Crazy talk or Cell Phones.. well thats just Down Right Maaad.. I Tell Ya...
You wouldn't believe there are craft that in a bad day , can suck electricity right out of the power grid to gimp home, causing rolling blackouts. Or Craft that look invisible, direct energy weapons that are used pretty frequently and much more.. So you Mock all You want.. Personally, I would have not acted like a prick and maybe asked a question or two or left it alone. But when They prove the World is Round and we are Flying through the Air in Giant Air Planes , everyone is carrying around a phone and computer in their pocket, and we are Launching People into Space... You'll have to Look at Yourself in the Mirror and think about all the people You Crucified and all the witches You Burned.. Then again.. judging from your demeanor, you will probably say.. Yup.. I knew about it all along...
Lighten Up. Or why would anyone share information or experiences with You.. Who knows.. You could have asked where and when and do I think that research is still going on in these places.. Its5one thing to see something shoot across the sky while your driving , it's a whole other beast to goto a place where you can see something coming and going or an accident once in awhile that shakes you to your very core..
Treat others as You want them to treat you or just go on about your day.
P.s. The World isn't Flat...
To say we know nothing about the universe is an understatement.
It's amazing that we still don't know what gravity is. We can't put it in a jar, we can't paint it red. We can only measure it's effect. Any anti-gravity device will be expertly built but we'll have no idea how or why it works.
And thats what the scientists whove been studying the captured alien saucers for the last 70 years have been thinking.
Spoiler Alert: We've had anti-gravity technology since 1956. The "government" is keeping it under wraps, however. Want to catch up with the truth that most people are ignorant of? Give me a "click" if you're ready for information that's more important than anti-gravity: including, the simple cure for cancer and the Meaning of Life.....
@@tomrhodes1629 How about "no"?
@@tomrhodes1629 Ahh yes the beauty of conspiracy nonsense. Just amazing the technological advances that do not exist that have supposedly been made.
Possible leads:
Zero point energy, quantum foam, vacuum permittivity (ε0), negative energy, negative resistance, E=mc², energy density, inductor properties in electronic circuits, quantum behavior of inductors, relative behavior of differential values (maybe also vectors?) - a loophole of sorts for properties with absolute values to act like negatives, magnetic fields, and superconductors.
My take on it is that gravity is associated with mass only due to the potential energy contained within the mass. So instead of taking it in regard to mass, it's the amount of energy within the mass vs. the distance from the average center of mass, vs. the (spherical?) surface area in relation to the radius from the averaged center. And in relation for every interaction it's something like the sum of that effect going each way. Crazy enough how I picture it, I lack the patience for math to put it in more clear terms, but somebody else could take a shot at it from this perspective and see if it goes anywhere. And if it's getting close, it may be interesting to see how some already known constants may wedge in there to make the model balance out.
To make an anti-gravity technology, we truly need to know what gravity is. We have known its effect. Much more to explore.
You mean worlds scientist dont know what gravity is
Vikrant bagde exactly. We can measure it and derive important equations from it but nobody really knows what gravity is.
@The Swoop oh shit i better guickly steal that so ican finally return to neptunia
@@thisistheway96 only super fast spinning black holes are omnidirectional since the singularity cant compress to a single point. Or thats the likely theory. Olso black planets?
Sure boblazars sayings saund like they are true but most of the documentaries bend the truth guite a bit. And there still are meny inconsistensies.
(Sorry for bad english)
Something about this video just 'pulled me in' when I saw it pop up in my subscriptions box.
RPKVids I must admit, it is a very attractive topic.
This is a fascinating subject and what is not so surprising is that the work seems to have gone underground.
It will take the birth of another Einstein type of genius to find an answer to what gravity actually is.
Imaging the possibilities.
at 0:15 the question is, "Could an apple that falls onto a table and splits into 4 equally sized pieces with surfaces sliced perfectly flat Really Be Possible?"
I really need a anti gravity to push me out of bed every morning
need to get some of that element 115.....
well, it's called Moscovium, and it was finally synthesized in 2003 and it has none of the properties lazar claimed back in the 1980's.
It's also completely useless as it decays less than a second after it's created, so you can't store / keep it.
Just like the 2012 end of the world prediction, lazar's claims are all made up fantasy which has given him a massive, free advertising campaign for his business called "United Nuclear"...
How do you know of this???? Keep your mouth shut!!!
@@ShanerTheGrey ehh ???
@@HPPalmtopTube ya lazar is a liar no doubt but it was a funny comment.
@@HPPalmtopTube That because the element 115 that was found on the craft was stabilized. Current element 115 the we hold isn' stabilized.
I read a book on Anti-gravity once... and found the subject rather impossible to put down.
Newton: invented gravity in 1687
People in 1686: fly
Invented?
Asia Asia not exactly but come on man, I'm just joking :D
@@asiaasia2157 you are the woosh
@@colchronic woosh?
@@Dingobigboy357 do you really think so?
Since I started watching CD my psychedelics consumption went down.
No time for a trip? Just watch Paul's new shirt!
Literally
Curious Driod: Could Anti-gravity Really be Possible?
Flat Earther: Gravity isn't real! Buoyancy and density
As if buoyancy in any medium had any meaning without gravity...
@@stardolphin2 You don't understand buoyancy. High pressure seeks low pressure
Gravity is the centripetal force of earths rotation.
@@kellymartin3575 gravity is... Umm we don't actually know what it is. But it is there and constant and measurable.
Kelly Martin no, it is not.
human ancestors 2000 years from now:how did primitive man not understand anti-gravity tech?
Love the video's, wish they came out more often but keep up the great work ma man
Rather quality over quantity.
this dude has amazing content, his research is so good, everything he has said in this video makes me feel so much like their are some conspiracy's going on
Anon (So I'll call you, 🤔Hmm... Greg) is that your Phone Number after the 4 characters of text? If so why and perhaps you may wish to change it.
Lord Varys is not only interested in politics, he looks into science and physics to find ways to "climb laddahs" using anti-gravity.
I didn’t make a connection that they looked similar, but now I love them both more.
Xd
This is amazing
At my 71 years of age I have been there and done that and came to the conclusion, it would be best that certain things that you learn to stay very quiet, remember if the enemy find out what you know from your love ones to your country could be used to destroy anyone, careful, stay quiet and leave longer and in peace.
2001: Scientist given $450,000 grant to study a theoretical anti-gravity drive.
2004: F/A-18 pilot engages an aircraft that seemingly defies gravity and flies faster than any known aircraft.
😳
Nope, juste the same bullshit claims over and over:
www.skeptic.com/reading_room/pentagon-ufos-to-the-stars-academy-ttsa-ufo-media-frenzy/
Apparently your supposed anti grav UFOs are just more BS from the modern media business model that must sell BS claims to continue to exist.
@@lucofparis4819 Stop lying to people.
Luc Fauvarque That article is fair about what it says about George Knapp, Tom DeLonge, (especially) Jeremy Corbell, et. al., who’ll attribute anything to aliens, but Cdr. Fravor’s encounter and the videos can’t easily dismissed. Fravor didn’t “assume” the disturbance in the water was caused by the TicTac; as he explains in his interview with Joe Rogan, he actually saw it visually erratically flying over it, and after flying closer and getting it to mirror him, he saw it disappear instantly, and 30 seconds later the USS Princeton saw it on radar 60 miles away. Fravor also explains what’s going on in the targeting pod footage of it taken by a pilot who took off after him. He said it’d have shown an exhaust plume if it was any sort of aircraft, and while the pod’s range does change right before it takes off, Fravor says it’d still have to be going faster than anything we have to do that (BTW Joe mentions how Mick West, who pointed out the range change, finds every excuse to rationally explain something. But I’d trust someone who uses and knows how this equipment works over someone hell-bent on disproving everything). As for it being a bird or something, Fravor could visually see it was about 40 ft. long, and was actively jamming the radar of F-18 that got the video of it, so it was more than likely something technological.
As for the Gimbal video, the “aura” likely being an artifact is irrelevant. What is relevant is this thing was hovering in place for hours, totally resistant to the wind, something no plane, bird, balloon, etc. can do. As for the lack of “overwhelming video, photographic, and instrumental evidence of them” and the question “doesn’t the Navy have any cameras, radar and other surveillance equipment?” as the article states, the radar scans literally are “instrumental” evidence of them hanging around “all day.” Fravor also said if something like that appears on a ship’s radar, they really can’t do anything to to look at it closer unless a fighter jet with a camera pod is nearby, which the Gimbal video is, which clearly shows something quite unusual.
I’m not saying these things are for sure aliens, but unless there’s some ultra-secret branch of the government that’s testing these things, they can do stuff nothing we have is capable of.
Frame dragging; the reason galaxies spin faster than they should.
Possible. The rotating or moving body becomes "heavy", which is resolved by STR within relativistic masses. However, if the body is unsymmetrical (quadrupole moment), it loses energy through gravitational waves. Therefore, something that creates a compact feature is being considered and dark matter is the best candidate (for now). However, it is certainly a good idea to take into account your remark, ie the mass and space in the mixer, which induces additional gravity from the deformation of entrainment of space-time.
And also dark matter which keeps the galaxy together. Galexies spins too fast for the amount of gravity the galaxy creates meaning all the stars should 'fling' out of the galaxy like kids getting flung off a merry go round if an adult spins it fast enough. They can calculate the mass of a galaxy and the speed at which it rotates. This is how dark matter was discovered.
@@nvstewart Sure, but it's good to consider other mechanisms that emerge as an alternative to dark matter. It is a spiral structure of the arms, which adheres to its own gravity and equally to the central body. Then it's secondary gravity, etc. It's still under investigation.
Yes, amazing. Thank you so much for your review on anti-gravity possibilities, this is what i wanted, not just videos on "simulating gravity with centrifugal force".
Whoever makes an anti-grav craft would be super rich. Imagine floating down into the parking lot for another day at work. Everybody would be checking you out asking, whoa, how much did that thing cost?
beautiful documentary, nicely explained for everyone who has some interest in science
Gumnam Musafir. Still No anti gravity…
I've always found the concept of gravity control extremely fascinating.
I also think it's amazing that we still basically have no idea what gravity is.
The odd thing is that we can measure gravity, and its effects.
We can send probes to all the planets using gravity as a means of propulsion and guidance.
But all this time nobody knows what gravity really is?
Not too long ago we observed electricity and had no idea what it was- now look at us. There is reason to hope.
@@kirkjohnson9353 I've had this feeling, that once we figure it out, it's going to be so simple and so obvious it'll be amazing we didn't understand sooner. And also I kind of think when/if we figure out FTL travel, it'll require very little energy.
Although... I think my thoughts and ideas have been slightly influenced by the book "Speaker For The Dead". So I'm probably way off.
"A steerable artificial gravity source"? Why not just say "tractor beam"?
God damnit, Scott, I'm a doctor, not an engineer!
Beam me up
@Braxton Conley What you described is called a "teleporter" (molecular disassembly in one spot and reassemble in another). Different from using gravity to lift, move, or stop objects.
@Braxton Conley...
"Teleporter", and "tractor beam", have both been depicted in science fiction... but are two distinctly different things.
Doesn't Disney own that name now? Maybe there's your answer.
If gravity really is just the difference in "graviton pressure" by blocking graviton with mass in one direction, then we would need a way to redirect this graviton with energy which does not carry gravity, before they hit the object we want to influence.
So we need to block the "up" or generate our own gravitons in the direction of the "down".
Since we found gravity waves and neutrinos I am confident that it is possible, but only with more base research in field manipulation and energy transformation.
Earth: pulls u in
*pulls out reverse card*
You:pull earth in
Nothing pulls you, the earth does not pull, gravity does not exist, it is the subatomic particle AETHER that pushes you towards the magnetism of the earth. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
3:00 Now the TR-3Bs Black Triangles being charged by lightning might make sense.
I was wondering about the TR3B astra & was just about to comment. Do you have any vid links on it or literature links that you can point me to? My neighbor used to drive truck & make deliveries to several aerospace companies as well as experimental air force bases located near the everglades & near Kennedy space center (NASA). He claims he's seen the tr3b twice & gave me very vivid descriptions of it.
@@RichardCranium321 Nearly a year ago myself and a friend had one fly low overhead of us in Eastern Montana. It was completely silent and much bigger than I would have imagined. Where we were it was on course for Malmstrom airforce base which was about 75 miles by air.
@@justme-ij2qy Nice! I saw a black triangle 15 years ago, along with a couple other round looking lights. I've been trying to get footage of them! Figured 3 in 1 spot there's a reason they're there.... I saw an odd red flashing light there a few weeks ago.
My goal is to record one of those things flying directly over my head, or record one accelerate at impossible speeds :)
With the amount of sightings and phones with a camera.... we need more footage!!
@@justme-ij2qy one here was down a remote stretch of alligator alley & yes, it flew silent but moreover, it was moving slowly from east to west & then without spinning & no delay it immediately reversed course & was going back west to east in the same orientation + it didnt make a sound the whole time. What about lights, could you see any clearly to count? I've become very interested in this & I've seen footage of middle East where grunt level soldiers have captured it on film using what looked like some kind of light based particle weaponry to just level entire compounds in milliseconds
@@RichardCranium321 When I first noticed it, it was way off in the distance and the only way that I could tell that something was coming was because stars would disappear and then reappear in a pattern coming towards me. When it got close I could faintly see orange glowing circles underneath it, basically the color of dim red hot metal and when it passed overhead I could clearly make out it's triangular shape. The glowing areas struck me as openings, almost like a type of exhaust or a way of directing thrust/energy. There were no lights on it though.
I've reached the age to where I'm more interested in nullifying entropy.
I won't even buy green Bananas....
@@infiniteepoch8 Nah. Sounds like too much work.
Entropy is inevitable without pure energy conservation
@@dominickstewart433 I'm working on energy conservation, too.
@1234 I remember those days. (somewhat) They were fun.
What is gravity? If our space is spacetime and we visibly see an anomaly in space, then something is dragging the flow of time. Massive objects are simply stealing our time. In any case you massively stole my time with your great RUclips video's, keep up the good work.
I've watched several of your video's. This one motivated me to subscribe. Write a book, I'll buy it. If you are not a PHD or a professor, you should be. You have my attention. Thank you for the enlightenment.
Curious Droid : "Could Anti-gravity Really be Possible?"
Bob Lazar : "oh, gimme a break...."
Bob Lazar is a fraud.
@@zalankarpati4387 surprise, loser... he's not.
Could we have a complete series on “gravity” ? Your videos are awesome! Lol
There some alien out there looking at us like "psshtt wait till the dinosaurs come back "
I can't get excited about the subject of gravity. It just brings me down.
Those jokes are really heavy
Ah man 👍
Company
" We created an anti-gravity device "
US Departement of defense
" *Its free real estate !* "
The stats wants a space force so they can control all areas while nobody should control land sea air or space eexcept where they live. If they get their spaceforce were all fucked so if that happens Its just more reason to off politicians
Anti gravity is actually electromagnetic propulsion. That's part of it, the rest is the ability to change the specific gravity of an object so it can be "dialed" to a point where the object can be turned off and still stay at the altitude it was set to without any additional power.
Antigravity is linked with the notion of antimatter and anti-universe. Gemelar universes interacting via gravity force is how our world may work.
When I hear descriptions or approaches to anti-gravity, I feel as if too many people are missing the plot completely, and it owes to our language. You hear discussions about cancelling or repelling gravity, but that approach stems from viewing gravity as a force to be repelled or cancelled.
Gravity is actually just the bending of space-time, and an anti-gravity machine should be approached as the goal of re-straightening that space-time.
When people stop fiddling with spinners and chemical reactions and the like and begin approaches targeting the shape of space, then true lack-of-gravity can exist.
I expect this to eventually not only happen, but become fairly commonplace, as we strongly need a local area unaffected by the gravity of earth and stars for quite a lot of research to be done and for a lot of fact-checking over previous research where we might find new behavior in elementary particles and reformulate their descriptive equations such that gravity is properly sorted out.
Me: "im gonna try to sleep early"
Me at 2am:
LITERALLY ME
Along with boiling pasta
Yawn, I'm going to bed at 8, stays sitting up in bed watching RUclips videos until 2:30am.
02:01am here...
That happens to me nearly every day
Ya'll lightweights! If I'm not going to bed after the sun comes up during winter it's early to me.
Professional insominiac speaking lol
Gravity seems like science fiction.
9:32 "We still don't know what Gravity really is."
My guess is, "gravity" is an electromagnetic effect, affected by rotating cosmic bodies of varying mass interacting with one another.
As I was watching this, an idea occurred to me. Most of the existing antigravity concepts involve some form of mechanical rotation, or electromagnetism, or both, to create an antigravity effect. But what if.....what if the problem is thinking in terms of ANTIgravity? Could we instead think in terms of creating a gravitational field around the air/space craft itself, but a controllable field, one that could be directed so that it could be offset from the vehicle's center of gravity, thus causing it to literally fall towards equilibrium in any direction the operators wish? The potential here is that anyone inside the craft would not feel any G force whatsoever, no matter what kind of insane maneuvers the craft performs. Essentially, using directed gravitational beaming, the craft and its occupants would exist within their own gravitational bubble. This would also have the effect of slowing down time within the craft, relative to the external universe.
If this could actually be done, what we'd have would essentially be a form of warp drive. It would require a lot of power to produce a gravitational field strong enough to achieve truly spectacular performance, but it would also be highly efficient. No rockets, no jets, no huge fuel load to burned and hurled out the Craft's rear. The power source would almost certainly have to be nuclear, since that is the best way we know to get massive power from a relatively small amount of fuel that lasts a very long time.
Right. So how do we produce this self contained gravitational bubble?
I keep thinking about gravitational lensing, the phenomenon in which the gravitational field around large bodies like stars actually bends light. Einstein's principle of universal covariance says that everything has an effect on everything else, and Newton agrees, "for every action, an equal and opposite reaction."
So. Gravitation bends light. Can light bend gravitation? Meaning, is it possible to warp spacetime with light?
Not just any light, this would require extreme LIGHT DENSITY using the very upper limit possible in lasers. The idea is, even the light from the sun, intense as it is, is not coherent nor is it highly concentrated in a small space. It is spread out, so its effect on spacetime (hence gravitation) is very minute. This is rather like the gravitational interaction between a planet and a 170 pound astronaut on a spacewalk gone bad. Earth's gravitational field is pulling at the astronaut, but the astronaut is also pulling at the earth. The huge mass difference means the earth wins, and the astronaut plummets to his doom.
But. The Earth moves too. Just a TINY bit, maybe no more than the breadth of a quark.
Photons are massless, though, so how could they warp spacetime to create gravity?
See, I literally am thinking this through as I write, so I'm none too sure that this idea is going anywhere but down the toilet with all the other waste material. Even so, I keep going back to universal covariance. Everything in the universe affects everything else. Change value A, then value B is also altered. So is value X. And value J. So if we have super high powered laser light, generated by nuclear fusion & packed into a small a space as possible, going around rings which encircle our hypothetical air/space craft, with no gaps whatsoever between the rings which cover the entire craft, would the sheer light intensity at maximum density affect spacetime?
I think...I THINK🤣 that it might, because spacetime affects light. And, if we take the view that all particles are actually distortions or twists in a fundamental spacetime field, then it surely would.
So yeah. I just gave myself about 20 years of work to do🤣😹
Dude ... magnets !
The Earth has a magnetic force and what happens when two magnets are pushed together at the negative or positive ends ?
They repel each other. Is there a machine or way to increase the magnetic force in am object ?
So in theory a craft could defy gravity and if you could increase turn up the strength of the magnet you could use it to travel in a certain direction !
Work smarter, not harder.
Also, you want to verify the information you base your theory on .
They say that we are on a spinning ball in space which is not accurate.
That’s actually interesting… please message more if you figure something out that’s interesting.
Nice rant, but you're talking as if we can create a gravitational force, we can't.
@@wardaddy9910 Magnets aren't gravity. The Earth's magnetic field is WEAK.
Your whole hypothesis is relying on the Dunning Kruger Effect...
@@edwardfletcher7790
We currently can't. There was a time when we couldn't create an electromagnetic field or a nuclear reactor either, but that did not stop us from trying until we finally succeeded. There is ongoing research into gravitational propulsion by NASA and the US military. The US Navy, after the Tic Tac event became known worldwide, admitted that UAP's are real physical objects that appear to fly using technology that manipulates gravity and inertia. Science has a history of claiming that things are impossible and then uncovering new data that proves the 'impossible.'
I think it likely (if we do not allow our 'leaders' to 'lead' us into oblivion) that we will develop gravitational warp drive sometime within the next 50 years.
Professor Eric Laithwaite is absolutely amazing. I would suggest to people of all skill levels to watch some of his lectures and presentations. He is both incredibly skilled and amazingly entertaining, and I have no doubt that he would have had a very popular youtube channel or even TV show had the opportunities been available to him. I'm a postgraduate physicist, I love his work. Some of his work was directed towards children, even if you don't want to learn he is still incredibly entertaining. I can't say enough good things about the man and frankly wish I had the opportunity to meet him before he passed away.
May your wish come true!
So, when he (youtuber) says that in the 80's and 90's we actually investigated gyroscopic thrust. We didn't. Scientists just abandoned it because they assumed it was 'impossible', and the clip shown in the beginning of the video was, for example, never explained.
@@battmann5083 I've researched the Sandy Kidd device, and no, no serious research was conducted. It was figuratively just dropped like yesterday's trash because there's a lot on the line in terms of career for scientists today. The only ones willing to look at it are people in powerful positions, where they really can't "lose" because they're at the top.
Eric Laithwaite (seen in the video) did have a brief look at it, but ultimately he only focused on his own gyro experiments, failed, and then died. Literally. Sandy's device was never properly researched, and in a few years the 'hype' surrounding it disappeared, and the inventor became bitter and basically never recovered. He's pushing 80+ now.
@@battmann5083 Either way it's technically a lie to say that it was "investigated and they discovered it didn't work", which is what was said in this video. The only way to find out if it actually works or not is to actually investigate it, not stand and look at it and say "Wow, interesting", as you contemplate what's for tomorrow's breakfast.
Would love a follow up on this on the declassified us navy UFO clips...
The us navy has their own "ufos." Google Salvatore Pais patents. They're not even classified. The patents describe tech almost identical to what Bob Lazar described working on in the 80s. Different power source, same basic design and function.
The "tic tac" story was a CIA operation using government black budget anti gravity drones. Of course the Navy pilots knew nothing of this.
ruclips.net/video/_q32YJtOJ5Q/видео.html
I bet the Navy has more interesting classified information than in all of Steven Greer's "Vault" (see "Unacknowledged"). As far back and further than Tesla, the Navy was involved in some really super high tech craziness. Even the details of the Philadelphia Experiment, even minus some weird disinformation, has some incredible implications. USOs are all over and travelling at speeds that can't be understood, yet today I believe most of them are ours. Aristotle, yes THE Aristotle, the man that originated the great taxonomy of all things, a superb observer and an incredibly deep thinker saw something he described as a very large shield, fly in from the sky and dive straight into the Mediterranean. He set up a submerged observation station to keep an eye out for another one. A round shiny shield is a great description of a flying saucer. Having struggled to follow the enormous thoughts of Aristotle in philosophy grad school, I can't think of a more trustworthy observation.
There's that case that's been public. A saucer crashes into the water near a navy vessel. The vessel anchored over the USO and sent divers down. They listened to the goings on inside the craft for over a WEEK before the craft whirled up and moved out of the way of the navy and then shot out of the water. I imagine there is a ton of classified information that would be fascinating. If they've got one instance of a long term stake out of a live alien craft, they've probably got several. Some channels on RUclips shown tracking of sea floor objects, miles in diameter, moving around. I think that'd be the best way to recover treasure but would it need to be so big? No. Another billion dollar idea from me on a random thought.
I think my last one was an international joint operation to clean our plastic out of the oceans and produce a type of Trex lumber with help fibers instead of sawdust like Trex lumber. The lumber lasts forever and is expensive. This new kind would require some chemistry and the product could save countless trees and finance a small portion of the recovery effort but the biggest payoff would be the give the US a better reputation worldwide. After invading innocent nation's, creating millions of refugees, over 100,000 dead, mostly their police officers, who are all people whom over a billion Muslims will never forget like we surely have, plus Guantanamo, speaking of flush and forget, held without charge, bail, trial or anything. Kidnappees. seizure of humans, citizens of other nations in most cases, forgotten by no one, except everyone American, the perpetrator, and Trump, no explanation required... Anyway, if we must fund the operation then so be it. We had no trouble coming up with 3 trillion bucks it took to kill people in other countries randomly out of misplaced revenge. In any case, we may have to be yelled at and just listen, an uncomfortable situation, but we must stone in some way and healing the planet in a tiny way is just the first step in international cooperation to pick up our trash. The sea is not a trash can. It's not an all-you- can-eat buffet either. Anyway, lumber that lasts like Trex but made by cleaning the planet and other sources of free plastic is a billion dollar idea. I'd love a fence I don't have to replace with fresh trees every 15 years would be a change with vast benefits everywhere. I got how I got sidetracked. Oh yeah, the navy? UFOs? Their secrets could make the cleanup go much smoother surely. Maybe it'd be a waste of classified capability, for the next stupid idea involving revenge overseas, from any retarded president, if that's something the US public really wants. I say that because we're supposed to be a democracy. Do you who felt the loss of young people on 911 convince you to kill 40 times as many other people's children? When those people had no part in the hijackings? All the hijackers died in the crash, in case that wasn't clear. oh, and they were Saudis. What am I.....? Clean the oceans, mend relations, save sea turtles and birds, smile ... "click"
@@likesrush WRONG !!
5:30 - sounds like she got it working, then.
Hence she was "disappeared"
@@anarchyantz1564 at least she wasn't "never existed" like Bob Lazar
@@UnfiItered Who? :)
duh
That or she's being utilized to study something unknown to us lol
*One needs to define gravity first: Gravity is simply the electrons in elements ALL traveling in an elliptical orbit. If you get enough mass together the elliptical orbit of of many septillion electrons crates gravity. On the surface of a black hole (A sphere of tightly packed neutrons) massive amounts of electrons crowd on the surface unable to pass into the tightly packed neutron mass. The elliptical orbit of these electrons could be measured in centimeters or or even meters and create massive gravity. Why is an elliptical neutron producing an invisible force? It's not the elliptical orbit but the differential in speed. The electron moves very slowly away from the element and on the flight back down to the element speeds up immensely. This acceleration towards the element creates the gravitational field. To control gravity one simply needs to control the flight of electrons and their shape and their orbit which is not so simple. If we ever do create anti-gravity it will take as much power in electricity as a rocket engine expels in chemical energy. That law can never be broken. It takes raw energy to defy gravity and in the future we will discover a device that will utilize these large amounts of energy necessary to power it.*
I've gotten into it with Droid before but he's truly a brilliant guy so I still find his stuff interesting 👍
Short answer: no. Long answer: what is gravity?
Yes, and gravity is electromagnetism. You create the proper field resonating at a specific frequency that cancels out the frequency of earth's magnetic field. It's how all your UFO's operate. It's rather simple really.
@@A.Martin Ultimately humanity has put the cart before the horse in their search for the cause of this phenomena. Order of discovery: 1)Things fall down 2) things in lower GPE pass through time slower. This sequence of observations in combination with evolutionary disposition towards the affects of gravity biases it as the cause (and the seeking of the agent responsible i.e. graviton), not the consequence of other more tangible (yet minute) phenomena i.e. time dilation.
The derivation of The Propagator that includes the possibility frontier to accommodate regions of different time dilation (i.e. regions of lower/higher GPE) should show when evaluating the path integral, a propensity towards the "slower" time dilation regions... i.e. "it fell down".
This same tool set will be useful in explaining weirdness when that possibility frontier includes regions where there is no future outside once crossed... i.e. crossing an event horizon.
humanhiveanomaly “At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in the comment section is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.”
Love that reply.
@@intrepidmind5264 hahaha
I'm distracted by the style of this man constantly.
I'm distracted by his shirt
Dont you dare to mess with his awesome shirts! Just awesome...
A damn race of Traitors is out there paying artists like this to advertise what doesn't exist, it's a way of distraction for the Humanity. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Hmm...Seems like Dr. Ning and Yevgeny are onto something.
...or on something
Pretty sure that anyone could replicate her experiments.
@Cowworshiper PissDrinkingHindus just search up on arvix. Haven't checked but would assume researchers with resources would.
Spoiler Alert: We've had anti-gravity technology since 1956. The "government" is keeping it under wraps, however. Want to catch up with the truth that most people are ignorant of? Give me a "click" if you're ready for information that's more important than anti-gravity: including, the simple cure for cancer and the Meaning of Life.....
@@tomrhodes1629 I'm more interested in essential oils that keep big pharma from touching my home-schooled measles-riddled child-experiment. Do you have any of that?
Superconductivity at room temperature is finally here. Next is anti-gravity.
4
Yea true but you need like quadrillion pounds of pressure for it to work at just above 32° Fahrenheit. So is superconducting really here or did we just discover its sister who we can't be with also?
@@MauricioBarragan 0.0 o.0
"Antigravity" does not exist and never will be. Unless you're the master of time and dealing with the antimatter that would result. All that remains is the expansion of space through dark energy, but even that does not interfere with gravity and is unusable on a small scale.
Electro-gravitics have been experimented with since 1954 according to the late Ben Rich, former CEO of Lockeed's "skunk works" in SOCAL.
Try rotating Mercury with a high electro magnetic field it lifts
Atleast you understand that also, not many people understand that Mercury works well with electromagnetism, or the fact that when both combined, it defies physics....there's even a patent for it also
@@mrlorddoom3948 a semantic argument: it doesn't actually defy physics if it works. It just isn't easy to explain.
yes, this is called electromagnetism. It's how magnets work
@lee morse aren't you a charming one, obviously you haven't seen it listed, literally type it in Google you nob head!
Also you moron, each listed Patent that has been made also got abandoned because of the theoretical physics of it being explained, next time choose your words wisely and research before making yourself look like a complete idiot, all the patents that have been abandoned are all listed publicly.
Patents identification number.
*CN102761296A
*US20120092107A1
*CA2831299A1
*CN102092254A
@lee morse you're telling me to grow up yet you whine and call me stupid, obviously you have no respect, just a common tool who wasn't raised properly by your parents, such shame you bring yourself child.
Also that technology isn't ready for the public convention of technology dim wit, if I was a politician, I would ban such technology and put it to use only in the military 🤭🤭🤭
Seriously though, such tech isn't ready for a commercial scale and if you believe it simply can't be manufactured, I'm deadset sure the military will have it first before the rest of the world does... besides we have NDA's for a reason.
Not only is it possible, but it’s a fact that someone has the ability to overcome gravity. And I swear by my behind that is a true statement!!
Kudos for pronouncing the name of Yevgeny Podkletnov 🤣
Do math with gravity being a push. and its omni present energy
Garyuniqueme Erbe Nice comment dude, makes total sense and is 100% related to the comment from OP.