Philo-co-Loco | Clip | Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июн 2022
- Imam al-Shaafa’i said:
"The people did not become ignorant and begin to differ until they abandoned Arabic terminology and adopted the terminology of Aristotle."
Clip from:
Al-Aqeedatul-Waasitiyyah | 86 Al-Eemaan and the Sinner | Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari
• Al-Aqeedatul-Waasitiyy...
#like #share #subscribe
________________
👍 Follow us on:
🌍 www.onewaytoparadise.net
🔗 Facebook: / abumussabwajdiakkari
🔗 Facebook: / onewaytoparadise
📱 Telegram: t.me/onewaytoparadise
How is Abu Mussab always able to make it extremely humorous yet educational?? 😭😭👍 May Allāh bless him
Aameen
What is educational in this video?
1+1 =2 ?
If this what you got, then sadly you aren't ready to comprehend education. May Allaah make it easy for you.
@@OneWayToParadise Bro 1 +1 =2 or straightforward info is revolutionary to these ppl, Ashari imams hide going to the text to cover their greco bida.
the ppl of bida have same flaws as ahlul kitab who think 1+1+1 =1 because mystery & admit ignorance but instead kalamist say philosophy & feign intellect.
1 The Prophet P.B.U.H Did ➡️ NOT ⬅️ instruct us to follow any imam.
2 Allah Did ➡️ NOT ⬅️ instruct us to follow any imam.
3 The imams did ➡️ NOT ⬅️ instruct us to follow them.
4 The ➡️ complete & perfect ⬅️ Islam existed before the arrival of all the Imams.
5 All the 4 Great imams said, if you find a hadith which contradicts what we have taught you then ➡️ REJECT ⬅️ what we taught you & follow the teachings of Prophet P.B.U.H.
6 Are you ready to follow an imam if it means ➡️ REJECTING ⬅️ a Hadith 🤦🏻♂️❓
If Abu Mussab was able to make that at the spot, imagine how further they can go in making these arguments just by connecting random things! 😭😭 May Allāh protect us..
It is mere speculation at the end of the day. But look at there coincidence, the real delusional people are them, the philosophers.
Jazakallah kheyran
SHEIKH IS SO FUNNYYYYY........ AND THE EDITING IS GETTING BETTER DAY BY DAY😁
Love it talk of Abu Mussab❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Allahumma barak
When Ustadh Abu Mussab started to rhyme with 'Meta', I just lost it 😂😂😂😭
Ustadh is really gifted with rhyming on the spot Allahuma Barik.
Yesss 😭
ustadh should make a poem soonn it seems
All those muslims who claim we must believe in a person with a Degree, are lying
👉🏻 Because an Average BARELVI will REJECT a SHIA Scholar with a DEGREE
👉🏻 Because an Average DEOBANDI will REJECT a AHL I HADITH Scholar with a DEGREE
👉🏻 Because the perfected & complete islam did not instruct us to have a 👨🏼🎓 degree to preach
👉🏻 Because the Prophet P.B.U.H said even if you know one ayat pass it on, this proves we do not need any degree & it proves we do not need to become a SCH0LAR, MUFTI or ALIM before preaching
he is the Al-MetaSheikh
May Allah protect this religion and the people Allah destined to guide other people into its purest form ❤️
The saying in my country is the emptiest barrel sounds the loudest. Barakallahu fiik bro Wajdi, keep em coming.
2:54 - props to the editor!!!!!!! It keeps getting better and better!
Mussab this time, baaraka'Allaahu feeh.
Esp the bit where the owl pops out during hoooo oooo😹😹👏👏
The ending was beautiful and needed - perfect transition 😂😂🙌
No fancy words, just common sense! Easy to understand. It's always a pleasure listening to you.
Mashallah, Mus'aab has lot of talent.
"I am more worthy of that banana before my workout"....subhan Allah !!!
More power to you ya akhi fil Islam.
As our beloved prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him) said tell your brother if you love him.
I am saying I love you Akhi for the sake of Allah .
1:09 I lost it there 😭😭😂 the editing in this video had me dying😭🤣🤌🏻
Wow MashaAllah very well said Wallahi.
🤣 your breakdowns are too funny 🤣 and soooo on point.
May Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) bless you and your family abundantly.
I was attending this class and I died laughing 😂😂😂
Can you send me its link.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq ruclips.net/video/JHvM1iHKTiQ/видео.html
Oh.. you died huh.. it depends what you mean by "died". 😂
We were all request this part to be the clip. And they did. Mashaa'Allah Tabaarakallaah.
I can’t explain how accurate this video is 😂😂.
This is exactly one of the people I know who claims to be intellectual and a student of philosophy acts like.
The "weeeeeeeee" took me out LOL!
Good expression of “smart intellectual” 👍
Philo-co-Loco yaa sheikh you’re funny 🤣
Ahh... I love this attitude from you Ustad.. Legendary..💯🙌👍
جزاك الله خيرا والله مرات يا ابو مصعب تفصل هههه الله المستعان فتخلينا نضحك معاك أسعد الله في الدارين.
Been expecting this clip. Baarakallahu fiikum!
wa feeka baaraka'Allaah
Jazakallah Khair ustadh
Wa iyyaak
The editing makes it even more funnier 😭👍
To, the person who edited this, (I think Mussab did) you did an amazing job, had me laughing... Lol 😂😭
Perfect guess
@@OneWayToParadise Good job Musab. Barakallah feek.
Lol 😂 the cats ......
May Allaah grant u all aafiyah keep up the good work!
Aameen
May Allah keep you steadfast my beautiful brother
hahaha...great point...may Allah give you tawfek
Our job is to spread the message of the Quran and Sunnah, not philosophy
I heard one deobandi saying that this is the discussion for scholars only because its complicated. I said to myself that yes it is complicated in terms of philosophy. Without philosophy its easy to understand.
@@osamamanan2723 Shows you an illustrative line between man made religions and the divine religion.
❤️🍁
You are doing a great job sheikh May Almighty Allah continue to keep you for us Ameen
May Allah bless the ustadh, Wallah He is very funny.
Subhanallah sheikh. That was pretty awesome that you come up with random facts in your head like a snap. And it has connection to the topic at hand. Aewesom
The logic of putting Quran and Sunnah first, this is of Tawhid, if you don't have this logic you dont have any...
When he said philosophers speak sp much and say so little it says it all, the sunnah is to be concise, this is enough to refute kalam batil, even if they weren't ignorant their method would frustrate themselves to the point of compromise the din...
Absolutely.
Our Salafī brothers accuse the Ashāʿirah that their methodology of understanding Allāh’s certain attributes is against the pious Salaf and has been taken from Greek philosophy. This is incorrect and a slander. The Ashāʿirah’s method is in line with the Salaf and sound reasoning. Take this one example, amongst the many, which clearly demonstrates their valid methodology: Allāh says in the Quran: Everything will perish except His ‘Wajh’ (Sūrah Al-Qaṣas). If one takes the literal meaning of ‘wajh’, which is ‘face’, this will mean that everything will perish except for Allāh’s face. So the question is: can those literalist, who establish two hands, two eyes, etc., for Allāh suggest that the meaning of this verse is that His face will only remain after everything else perishes? And Allāh’s refuge is sought!
This is why Imām al-Bukhārī (yes, Imām al-Bukhārī) in his Ṣaḥīḥ compilation interpreted the ‘wajh’ of Allāh as 'ملكه' (His kingdom). Imām al-Bukhārī understood that the literal meaning of these words is not intended as it anthropomorphises Allāh, which is against His majesty, His absolute transcendence and contradicts the unambiguous verses like ‘There is nothing like Him’. In addition, there isn’t a single authentic report that the Salaf translated these words into the English language.
Ashāʿirah preserved the creed of the Salaf just as Imām al-Bukhārī, and the Ḥadīth scholars, preserved the Ḥadīth from the Salaf.
#Ashāʿirah&Māturīdiyyah
The truth of the matter is that the framework of dialectical theology (ʿilm al-kalām) expounded by the notable Ashāʿirah & Māturīdiyyah is the solution to the theological challenges we face here in the West by atheists and others.
A literalist, who is devoid from sound reason & contextualisation of revelatory evidences, cannot coherently explain why he believes that Allāh is on the throne with His essence and, at the same time, descends to the sky in the latter portion of the night - not forgetting that every moment it is the latter portion of the night somewhere in the world!
How can Allāh always be on His throne with His essence and simultaneously be in the heavens? And Allāh’s refuge is sought from such obfuscations!
In addition, those who advocate that Allāh literally descends with His essence to the sky of the earth are justifying the creed of ‘Ḥulūl’; that is to say that God dwelled in His creation. This is the Christian doctrine that God dwelled in Jesus and the doctrine of all those who believe in a human deity. The disbelievers will ask: According to these Muslims, if God can dwell in the sky, which is His creation, why can’t He dwell in another human which is also His creation? والعياذ بالله
Thus, the creed of Ahl as-Sunnah is that Allāh is free of place, space and direction. ‘Allāh is the Creator of everything’ (Quran). ‘Allāh existed and nothing apart from Him (including place, space, direction, sky, etc) existed’ (Bukhārī).
Don’t let the literalist tell you that you shouldn’t use your reason and intellect. Allāh says: ‘Will you not use (your) reason (ʿaql)?’ (Quran).
Using our reason and intellect to understand revelation is part of our religion. As Imām Al-Ghazālī says in his Al-Iqtiṣād , a blind person cannot appreciate the light of the sun; likewise, one who is devoid from sound reason cannot understand revelation.
I was discussing with you in another comment, but the entire discussion got removed or deleted I think, Allah knows best.
I responded with something like, "life" itself doesn't necessitate any limbs especially God's living, that reasoning is like saying knowledge necessitates a brain or God needs oxygen for His independent life just cause the creation do, but that is contradictory as God is independent. Your argument of, "cause creation needs therefore creator needs" is patently false of course. Knowledge on its own or Gods perfect knowledge obviously doesn't necessitate a brain, Nor does God - the exalted - need oxygen for His living obviously as *He's completely independent and is distinct from creation entirely* . Furthermore, the problem as you are falsely conflating, isn't with the *qualitative attributes* such as, life, knowledge, seeing, hearing, power, will etc. as none of these bring eyes, limbs, anything composite or anything anthropomorphic to the mind or liken God to creation, this isn't a proper analogy compared to when you take "aboveness" literally or "yad" literally/the false outward meanings that then necessitates a sort of limb and likening God - the Exalted - to Humans or creation.
(*the following is taken from a book ) The premise here is that the qualitative attributes and the expressions and ascriptions mentioned in the ambiguous texts are equal. This premise is flawed as we shall demonstrate. The distinction between the expressions that indicate corporeal bodies and those that indicate qualitative meanings is vast. The first thing that comes to mind when the former is heard is a limb and body- for which the terms were coined. When those expressions are ascribed to Allah, the exalted, the one who knows Allah clearly and incontrovertibly knows that the outward and primary meanings are impossible and are negated from Allah, the exalted, and that the context of the words indicates a metaphor or figurative speech, This is like the expressions hand, finger, foot, shin, face, laughter, rising descent, and other expressions that, in their literal sense that first appears to the mind , refer to sensory objects. as for the latter The Qualitative attributes, they refer to a meaning, such as power, will, hearing, seeing, and so on. There is no implication of resemblance for the one who understands them in their outward and literal sense, because they are meanings and realties that befit Allah, the exalted, and and when they are ascribed to the creation, they have realities fitting for them. For this reason, the scholars of the Umma were not obliged to disregard their outward meanings. Strengthening this view is the fact that is is not reported from any of the pious predecessors - may God be pleased with them - that they said regarding the *qualitative attributes* "pass it along without "how"" or "pass it along without explanation," and so on. This was due to there awareness of the distinction between the two types of expressions (end of book passage).
Moreover, we don't reject what God - the Exalted - ascribed for Himself, 'ala arsh or yadan, as is falsely attributed to Us. We just reject the literal/the impossible outward meanings for the expressions that aren't qualitative, but the ones that indicate corporeal expression which entail limbs or deficiencies and anthropomorphism and God - the Exalted - said: "there is nothing like unto Him" "nothing is comparable to Him".
Look at aqidah tahawiyyah, which pretty much the entire ummah is accepting of, which negates limbs, limits, directions etc. for God. Here is just to give one quote from the venerable scholars and salaf - may God have mercy on them:
And consider this statement from Imam Ahmed - may God be pleased with Him - that was recorded in His tabaqat al- Hanabila (2:291): Indeed, Allah, the exalted, possess "two hands" and both are an attribute of His in His essence. They are not physical limbs; they are not composite; they are not corporeal or from the genus of corporeal bodies; they are not from the the genus of that which is limited and composite or (the genus) of parts of limbs. Analogy is not to be made with them; He does not posses a wrist or forearm; nor that which is implied when they (people) apply their statement "hand" except what is articulated in the holy Quran or authentically reported from the messenger of Allah peace be upon Him in the sunna regarding it."
- Here we see that Imam Ahmed - may God be pleased with Him - negated everything that was linked to false outward meanings, such as physical limb, parts, compositeness, and so one. He clarified that further with his statement "...nor that which is implied when they (people) apply their statement "hand."") What this means is that all of the aforementioned meanings that apply to the word "hand," such as it being physical limb and body, are negated from our lord - the exalted.
"The logic of putting Quran and Sunnah first, this is of Tawhid, if you don't have this logic you dont have any...
When he said philosophers speak sp much and say so little it says it all, the sunnah is to be concise, this is enough to refute kalam batil, even if they weren't ignorant their method would frustrate themselves to the point of compromise the din"
Not sure where din is ever compromised, and your first claim is like saying a non muslim cant be logical. Also Allah says "will you not reason", many a times we use reason and logic to understand scripture, revelation and to come to the realisation of a creator of this universe who is one... Not sure where you demonstrated "kalam" is batil, I'm certain you barely know what it means. Furthermore, just look at the contributions from ones who used "ilm al kalam" and wholly accepted it , a few examples imam nawawi, ibn hajar, Imam ghazali, imam Juwayni, imam suyuti imam, qurtubi the mufassir, by God, this is just barley scratching the surface. I'm guessing according to you and your cult these venerable giants were all extremely misguided and "like pharoah" in this regard. We seek refuge in God - the exalted - from that.
I didn't understand that 1+1=2 part (ofcourse the philosopher's one) 😭😂😂😂😂
نعم
Those same people who say Allah is everywhere are the same people who point up to say their shahada.☝🏼😂
Wallahi I couldn’t stop laughing man 😭🤣😭🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
love the clip lol. the editing is improving substantially.
معك حق كنت أشاهد أحد الدعاة لما يتحاورون ملحد بلفلسفه كنت اقول في نفسي شو هاد ماني فاهمه شيء شو عم يدور هون وكنت متحيره والله بعدها خلاص ابتعدت اي كائن بيتكلم فلسفه لانو محا استفيد إلا الضياع الوقت جزاكم الله خيرا
assalaamu 'alaikum.
Allahumma barik.
Keep up the hard work akhi 👍👍
may Allah bless you and your family ameen.
This was more hilarious than what I was expecting :))
Great video, jazaka Allah khair. 2 divided by 1/2 is 4 though 😅
U went on a funny roller coaster
3:29 they edited out the part where he was ranting in Arabic 😂😂😂
صح
🤣🤣🤣
(Fact: When there is lack of religion there is an increase in philosophy and vice versa !) Peace !
6:57 i lost it here 😂😭😭 The little animation 💀
🤣🤣🤣 you should have said at the beginning that's entire video is funny.. I ended up laughing louder in a crowd ..subhanallah. Qur'an &Sunnah suffices alhamdulillah.
Hahaha that's hilarious. Happens to the best of us.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 i can't breathe!
May Allah guide or destroy those Asharis , maturidi , or other deviants sects . They have caused a lot harm to the ummah with their kufr beliefs.
Aameen
ustadh seems to be so fed up of these people🤣🤣
@Stephanie Asiya yeah!!👍
yeah!!👍
The example of mathematic ( 1 + 1=2 ) is exactly how asharis, maturidi, or others deviant sects sound when it comes to the attributes of Allah .
The funny thing is all of there premise stands from the Plato cave anology, that all of reality can be known while you sit in the comfort of your bedroom. This is the reason why it is called speculative theology, because at the end of the day all of there premise and conclusions are unprovable.
wa'rehmatallahi wa'barakatu !! Ustad I wanted to ask this thing, I watched a video by ustad Shamsudden ( Shamsi ) saying about Aqeeda clarification from Ustad Uthman ibn Farooq . If you have any idea about this thing can you please make a video and make a layman like me understand. Jazakallah khayr
I hate to be that guy but 2 divided by 1/2 is 4 not 1 🤫
But its mujjassima.....😂😂😂
Yeah, he wanted to say 2 x ½
The Clown of the dawah
No. Are you the clown of the comments section?
If you don't like ustahd's way of dawah,.no one is forcing you to watch. Just leave.
Have you conducted any class for hajj.. Please provide the links if you have any?
Lol hehe but yeah i take your point and i second it
What did Abu Mussab drink/eat before the class?? 😭 Allāhumma Bārik
🤣
Coffee maybe
They think if you object, then you are necessarily unable to understand.
Mr me my self and i in action again...
Assalamualaikum warahmatullah wa barakaatuh Brother Abu Mussab, do you have any lectures regarding LGBT issue? May Allaah put barakaah on everything you do.
Wa 'alaykumus-salaam wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh
#7 Tafseer As-Sa'di: Soorah Ash-Shu`arâ' | Aayahs 160-175 | Abu Musssab Wajdi Akkari
ruclips.net/video/4oMQszG7oLg/видео.html
It’s true thou you not lying
Have you ever opened an usul al-fiqh book?
How can we help you brother?
@@OneWayToParadise If you're so mad about terminology and التدقيق في المسائل then you should be attacking Fiqh, Usul al-Fiqh, Mustalah al-Hadith, Nahw, Sarf, etc. books first before attacking philosophy.
This whole video is basically saying "I don't understand the arguments philosophers make, therefore they are wrong".
@@user-hp2dr5qc8p They are wrong because the Salaf condemned them, there approach undermine every tenant of Islam.
Abd al-Rahman b. Mahdi said:
“I entered upon Malik, and with him was a man asking him. So he said: ‘It seems you are from the companions of ‘Amr b. ‘Ubayd? May Allah curse ‘Amr! Verily, he innovated this innovation of Kalâm; and if Kalâm had been knowledge, then the Companions and the Followers would have spoken about it, just as they spoke about the rules and regulations.”
[Source: Abdallah al-Ansari, Damm al-Kalâm wa-Ahlih 4:116 no.874]
Imam Malik stated:
“I do not like Kalam except in what involves ‘Amal (action), but as for Kalam about Allah, silence is better than it.”
Imam Malik used to say also:
“Kalâm concerning the religion I hate. And the people of our land (i.e. Madinah al-Munawwarah) have not ceased to detest it and to prohibit from it, like the idle speech founded in the opinion of Jahm and al-Qadar and everything that resembles that. And speech (kalâm) is not liked, except when it has action under it. So as for speech (kalâm) concerning the religion of Allah and concerning Allah ,the Mighty and Majestic, then silence is beloved to me. For I have seen the people of our country prohibiting from speech concerning the Religion, except that which has action under it.”
[Source: Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, Jami’ Bayân al-‘Ilm wa Fadlihi p. 415]
Imam Abu Hanifah said:
“I use to count Kalâm the most preferred science. And I used to say: This al-Kalâm concerns the foundation of the religion. I then returned myself after what passed of my age and pondered. and said: [in myself]: Verily, the preceders from the Companions of the Prophet, peace and the blessing be upon him, and the Followers and those who followed them were not passed by anything what we perceive [today]. And they were better able and acquainted and knowledgeable about the realities of things; furthermore, they did not rise against disputants and discussers, nor did they partake in it but rather held off from that (i.e. Kalâm). They prohibited that strongly.. - until he says - ..after this what we’ve described manifested to us concerning their conditions, we abandoned dispute and debate and plunging into Kalâm; and we returned to that where the Salaf were upon.”
[Source: al-Kardari, Manaqib Abi Hanifah p.137-138]
Imam al-Shafi’i’s famous statement:
““My judgment with respect to the partisans of Kalâm is that they be smitten with fresh leafless palm branches, that they be paraded among the communities and tribes, and that it be proclaimed: “This is the punishment of him who has deserted the Book and the Sunna, and taken up Kalâm!”
[Source: al-Bayhaqi, Manâqib al-Shafi’i 1:462 and many others]
Imam Ahmad said during the Mihna:
“I am not a person of argumentation or Kalâm. I am only a person of narrations and reports.”
[Source: Hanbal b. Ishaq, al-Mihnah p. 54]
Imam Ahmad stated:
“Whoever is given to Kalâm will not succeed, and whoever is given to Kalâm will not be free from becoming Jahmite.”
[Source: Ibn al-Jawziy, Manaqib al-Imam Ahmad p. 205]
And from Imam Ahmad who said
“If you see a man loving Kalâm, then warn against him!”
[Source: Ibn Battah, al-Ibanah 2:54 and others]
Imam Shu’bah b. al-Hajjâj said:
“Sufyan al-Thawri used to hate the Ahl al-Ahwâ’ and prohibit strongly sitting with them. And he used to say: ‘Upon you are the Athâr and beware of Kalâm concerning Allah’s Essence!'”
[Source: Abdallah al-Ansari, Damm al-Kalam wa-Ahlih, 4:171 no.950]
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq
Imām al-Bayhaqī narrated that Imām ash-Shāfi‘ī said:
"Every mutakallim that is on the Qur'an and Sunnah (meaning limits himself to the Qur'an and Sunnah) then this is the necessary limit, and every mutakallim that has no principles (meaning no limits) and no sunnah then this is delusion".
Aṣ-Ṣāḥib ibn ‘Abbād narrated with his chain up to Isḥāq ibn Ismā‘īl ibn Ḥammād that he said:
"One day ash-Shāfi‘ī was discussing with some jurist, and he scrutinized and detailed, and made it hard for him to understand, so it was said to him: O Abā ‘Abdillāh (meaning Imām ash-Shāfi‘ī), this is for the people of kalām, not the people of ḥalāl and ḥarām! So he said: We had mastered the former before the latter."
Abū Yūsuf al-Fasawī narrated that Imām Mālik said:
"Ibn Hurmuz was a man that I loved to emulate, he rarely spoke and rarely gave fatwa, [he was] extremely discreet, and when he gives a fatwa to man, he used to often send someone to inform him to come back to tell him other than what he already gave him fatwa on. He (Imām Mālik) said: and he was very knowledgeable in kalām, and he used to refute the people of desires, and he was the most knowledgeable among the people on what the people differed upon regarding these desires."
Al-Khallāl narrated that al-Marrūẓī, the student of Imām Aḥmad said:
"Abū ‘Abdillāh (meaning Imām Aḥmad) used to rebuke the one who discusses matters of kalām, if there was no earlier Imām that spoke on them."
@@user-hp2dr5qc8p Still persistent on your deviance, after ample evidence I have given. Even these can easily be refuted. But I will give you something better read the book Dhamm Al-Kalām wa Ahlihi by Al-Harawi. or " Condemning Kalām(speculative theology) and Mutakallimeen (practitioners of Kalām)" is a book written by Abu Ismail Abdullah Ibn Muhammad Al-Harawi Al-Ansari, known as Abu Ismail Al-Harawi (396H - 481H) in which he warns against speculative theology and responds to the Mutakallimeen. He is great scholar who established the Sunnah and rejected innovations.
He cited the Hadiths of the Prophet, the sayings of the Companions and Followers, and then the sayings of the Scholars of his time.
The book is considered one of the references in responding to the theologians, and its author have been nicknamed Sheikh al-Islam because of his immense mastery of religious sciences.
Habibi, please turn the comments off before you blow your head
Also, many Ashari and Maturidi will be spamming the commenting section, doing internet bullying.
"We used 2 worship the law of cause & effect" 6:49 ; How did U do that?
😂😂😅😅 reminded me of NAK pondering
lolollllll 😭😭😂😂😂
With due respect,Can you tell me where you studied?
@Stephanie Asiya medina university?
And his age?
@@DAWAHFORHIDAAYAH 40+. A revert brother from Lebanese.
@Stephanie Asiya i studied about him.but didn't say anywhere that he studied in mediniah university academically.
Brother what is your take related to the controversy against Sheikh Uthman ibn Farooq?
What controversy? He calls to Quran and sunnah with understanding of the Salaf. None of us are free of mistakes and from good manners is we make dua for our brothers and hope for the best for them. He was Minhaj checked by our brother Mansour and it is clear He like us and you are only trying to be from those upon the correct understanding of Islam. Having said that May Allah make us from the 70000 that make it into Jannah without being questioned and grant us Jannah Firdaus. Ameen
@@rafaelsantiago9624 i mean the manhaj checking issue and his analysis to it. I am also giving benefit to Sheikh Uthman.
@@osamamanan2723 being Minhaj checked is super beneficial. Abu Mussab can attest many famous books of the scholars were written to clarify their Minhaj/aqeedah to the doubters. Instead of calling it Minhaj checked which comes off a bit distasteful we could just call it a clarification. Different words similar in meaning
@@rafaelsantiago9624 i am not against manhaj check but I trust what a muslim says unless he has clear cut mistakes even after the hujjah is established completely onto them e.g. brother Uthman said that he follows salaf, not a khariji, not an ashari so dont come and manhaj check me. So we should accept him as salafi because if he goes against the salaf that is only due to misunderstanding or a mistake not because he doesnt want to follow a manhaj. Thats why there is a difference between a mubtadia or a sahib al biddah. A person might be salafi but sahib al biddah. It can happen. Thats why I agree that unless a scholar is passing a judgement laymen or students of knowledge should not go manhaj checking. It was general statement by Sheikh Uthman. His point was that he probably clarified enough so people shouldnt check him.
@@osamamanan2723 Also, we should at least defend our brother from the Non-Salafi attacks, such as the recent Deobandi attack against him, by cherry picking his video and claiming he doesn't know how to recite the Quran.
Brother, could you please make a video to explain how we can still optimally use our reason as commanded by the Quran many times without falling into philosophy? Because you point out in this video that those who favor philosophy tend to argue that those who only follow the Quran and the Sunnah don't use their reasoning capacity. I experienced it myself. Although I understand that even studying the Quran and the Sunnah in the simplest manner need reasoning capacity and we will not be able to encompass the whole knowledge even until we die, I find it difficult to explain.
Read a book Akhi called the Logical Proof for the Oneness of Allah by Imam As-Sadi. It will help you a lot.
Also, by pondering over the Quran and the Sunnah, and being from the Ashab ul-Hadith, spending your time with the narrations of the Messenger of Allah.
Also, Akhi constantly ponder over statement of the Salaf condemning ilm ul-Kalam. I will mention to you some.
Abd al-Rahman b. Mahdi said:
“I entered upon Malik, and with him was a man asking him. So he said: ‘It seems you are from the companions of ‘Amr b. ‘Ubayd? May Allah curse ‘Amr! Verily, he innovated this innovation of Kalâm; and if Kalâm had been knowledge, then the Companions and the Followers would have spoken about it, just as they spoke about the rules and regulations.”
[Source: Abdallah al-Ansari, Damm al-Kalâm wa-Ahlih 4:116 no.874]
Imam Malik stated:
“I do not like Kalam except in what involves ‘Amal (action), but as for Kalam about Allah, silence is better than it.”
Imam Malik used to say also:
“Kalâm concerning the religion I hate. And the people of our land (i.e. Madinah al-Munawwarah) have not ceased to detest it and to prohibit from it, like the idle speech founded in the opinion of Jahm and al-Qadar and everything that resembles that. And speech (kalâm) is not liked, except when it has action under it. So as for speech (kalâm) concerning the religion of Allah and concerning Allah ,the Mighty and Majestic, then silence is beloved to me. For I have seen the people of our country prohibiting from speech concerning the Religion, except that which has action under it".
[Source: Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, Jami’ Bayân al-‘Ilm wa Fadlihi p. 415]
Imam Abu Hanifah said:
“I use to count Kalâm the most preferred science. And I used to say: This al-Kalâm concerns the foundation of the religion. I then returned myself after what passed of my age and pondered. and said: [in myself]: Verily, the preceders from the Companions of the Prophet, peace and the blessing be upon him, and the Followers and those who followed them were not passed by anything what we perceive [today]. And they were better able and acquainted and knowledgeable about the realities of things; furthermore, they did not rise against disputants and discusses, nor did they partake in it but rather held off from that (i.e. Kalâm). They prohibited that strongly.. - until he says - ..after this what we’ve described manifested to us concerning their conditions, we abandoned dispute and debate and plunging into Kalâm; and we returned to that where the Salaf were upon.”
[Source: al-Kardari, Manaqib Abi Hanifah p.137-138]
Imam al-Shafi’i’s famous statement:
““My judgement with respect to the partisans of Kalâm is that they be smitten with fresh leafless palm branches, that they be paraded among the communities and tribes, and that it be proclaimed: “This is the punishment of him who has deserted the Book and the Sunnah, and taken up Kalâm!”
[Source: al-Bayhaqi, Manâqib al-Shafi’i 1:462 and many others]
Imam Ahmad said during the Mihna:
“I am not a person of argumentation or Kalâm. I am only a person of narrations and reports.”
[Source: Hanbal b. Ishaq, al-Mihnah p. 54]
Imam Ahmad stated:
“Whoever is given to Kalâm will not succeed, and whoever is given to Kalâm will not be free from becoming Jahmite.”
[Source: Ibn al-Jawziy, Manaqib al-Imam Ahmad p. 205]
And from Imam Ahmad who said
“If you see a man loving Kalâm, then warn against him!”
[Source: Ibn Battah, al-Ibanah 2:54 and others]
Imam Shu’bah b. al-Hajjâj said:
“Sufyan al-Thawri used to hate the Ahl al-Ahwâ’ and prohibit strongly sitting with them. And he used to say: ‘Upon you are the Athâr and beware of Kalâm concerning Allah’s Essence!'”
[Source: Abdallah al-Ansari, Damm al-Kalam wa-Ahlih, 4:171 no.950]
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq Maa shaa' Allah. Jazakallahu khayran for the detailed replies yaa akhi. I will check the recommended book and take your advice into consideration in shaa' Allah. I hope other people will also benefit from your replies.
@@AlAmriArifSandy Likewise Akhi, May Allah bless you as well.
1 + 1 = 2 🚫
1/1 + 2*1/2*...... = 2 ✨
Underrated comment😭🤣🤌🏻
Brother, I think it's best you take a break from the youtube comments for a while. It seems to have taken quite the uh... toll on you... 😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂you..... wright Sheikh...
What i see is too much coffee ustad haha , try green tea maybe
Jazakallah khair
wa iyyaak
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Any thoughts on the recent insult to the Prophet pbuh by Indian BJP spokesperson?
This is a caricature and kinda unfair. I do agree brothers engaging in philosophy in dawah need to calm down a bit and that philosophy really should be more subtle and used in very specific circumstances to emphasis a point. May Allah forgive us all for our shortcoming🤲
Hello abu mussab
You said your field is I'm dawah
Thoughts on uthman farooq?
why are there cat pictures when taking about crucifixion ??🤣😂
Meta biology meta astronomy meta engineering ⚙️🧬🔭
2:38 You said 2 ÷ 1/2 that is 4 not 1. I can clearly see that you haven't studied metamorphogical quantum physics ya shaykh. It went right over your head😉
You bet I did not. Hope you realize that I was inventing this on the go... I don't rehearse or anything. Tough crowd lol.
@@OneWayToParadise I was joking akhi lol.
I had a feeling. Dang it.
@@OneWayToParadise This is Mussab right?
May Allah bless both of you
When you realise asha'irah, maturidiyyah and philosophers weren't mathmaticians in 'aqeedah...
Are you refuting Ibn Taymiyya? 😂
No of course. I was referring to sweet people like you.
@@OneWayToParadise How do you know he's sweet?
@@was1 there js a thing called sarcasm😭💀🤌🏻
😅😂
Is saying “oh son of a shoe” and Arab phrase for something else, or is it how it means - insulting someone’s mother?
@Seeker of knowledge طالب العلم because I was thinking of sharing the video, but if it’s the ustaadh insulting someone’s mother then I won’t
@Seeker of knowledge طالب العلم and it isn’t very good manners and doesn’t portray salafiyyah
2 divided by half is 4. Lol
2 MULTIPLIED BY half is 1. Lol
I’m just joking delete my comment if it’s annoyingn
PHAYLASOOFIYAH 😂
2 divided by half makes 4, not 1 ya captain hahah
I hope you realize that the whole delivery including the very thoughts were extemporaneous and impromptu. So please pardon the mathematical blunder. lol.
Something i noticed with philosphers that they are so arrogant and think they are always right ..i have came across too many of them and most of them share the same trait
I follow and learn from you a lot.and not a die hard philosophy fan.but this video is childish.leave them alone if it bothers you. Why not just propagate the knowledge you’re trying to propagate. I don’t see how these videos help any seekers of knowledge other than entertainment of "fans".
This is not meant to help you seek knowledge as there are hundreds of hours of classes on Tafseer and Aqeedah dedicated to that. This is an attempt to highlight the ridiculous nature of these people.
If you see that such videos do not suit you, we understand and apologize. We advise not to watch them. While they don't help you, they help others in different ways.
1+1=10 in binary 🤣
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
Reminds me of the woke lgbtqrst+×÷ lol
😂😂😂 meta bateekh.....
I though 1 + 1 = 11
2:32
2 ÷ ½ = 4
Just saying 🙄