Thanks Down to earth team for starting a climate change debate in india. While there's zero coverage of these critical issues in mainstream indian media, channels like these will enlighten the youth about these issue.
The mangroves in Sunderbans used to save West Bengal and Odisha from cyclones.But ever since mangroves are destroyed and becoming less and less its becoming a problem.Plus due to global warming Bay of Bengal water is warming up fast and forming depression and cyclones at regular intervals.The only solution to this is to check pollution and plant more and more trees.
Excellent analysis. Thank you! Wondering if there's a model to determine the impact of heat and rainfall increases too. What happens to food, water, health, worker productivity, businesses etc
It's not only in India but the whole world is facing it. Look at Europe for instance, it is getting warmer year after year and the rivers are drying up. It would be a thought provoking topic to look into.
Bangladesh temperature won't rise up much. Bit since the country is small and has too many people, and overall is low lying area prone to sea level rise, its problematic overall.
Unfortunately the Narrator and Supposed Climate Expert missed the "known fact" that Land Areas warm 2X - 4X the GAT. The GAT (Global Average Temperature is actually the Ocean Surface Temperature. So 1.5'c will mean 6'c on Land Areas.
Water has a higher melting point, boiling point, heat of vaporization, heat of fusion, and surface tension than such comparable hydrides as Hydrogen Sulphide and Ammonia or, for that matter, than most common liquids. All these properties indicate that the forces of attraction between the molecules in liquid water, and thus its internal cohesion, are relatively high. ~ Albert L. Lehninger,( Biochemistry), 2nd Edition
This also means that global warming can cause flooding, if, the temperatures are incredibly high and start exceeding the heat of vaporization of water remarkably.
Your report is largely biased because it doesn't say anything about several states & what's going to happen to them in terms of temperature & precipitation increases - Goa, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Maharashtra, MP, UP etc. I feel that your data is skewed & only talks about northwestern or northeastern states, but not the ones missed out.
All people commenting doesnt even have 2 trees in their home, maybe only 10% of you do, other dont. I doubt even the make of the videos have any place for trees in their home. Start with yourselves first.
Oh yes i will as soon our association allow planting two large trees in out flat. 🤦♂ Mate it's not the people you should be blaming here but the government. City planning and it's management dictates how people built their own home. Add our government's silence on property price and how we are having less and less single family homes, even if they exist for the current price not many are rich enough to leave space for a large tree.
The arctic is warming faster than the rest of the world.They are already at 2C of warming.There they are experiencing some periods that are 20 to 30C above average temperatures.If this were to happen in India just imagine the devastation.
Dr. Guy McPherson discusses the peer reviewed studies that show we are already past 1.5C, and that devastating climate change is no longer reversible. Is he wrong?
To limit global warming, rich countries like Canada must end oil and gas production by 2034: report ----------------- For the world to have a shot at limiting global warming to 1.5 C, Canada and other wealthy fossil fuel producing nations need to stop all production by 2034, according to a new report. The reduction in greenhouse gas emissions required to secure a livable future is “far more challenging” than any global leader is prepared to acknowledge, said Kevin Anderson, one of the authors of the report and a professor of energy and climate change at the University of Manchester. Emissions from fossil fuels are one of the main drivers of human-caused climate change. Published on March 21, the report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development proposes different phaseout dates for oil and gas producing countries by grouping them according to their differing wealth, development and economic reliance on fossil fuels. It found there isn’t room for any country in the world to increase fossil fuel production, and wealthy countries like Canada, the U.S. and the U.K. must be the first to end production to give smaller, poorer nations an equitable transition and provide them with financial support. The richest countries, which produce over a third of the world’s oil and gas, must cut output by 74 per cent by 2030 while the poorest, which supply just one ninth of global demand, must cut back by 14 per cent. If wealthy countries end fossil fuel production by 2034, middle-income countries by 2043 and the poorest countries by 2050, the world will have a 50 per cent chance of keeping global warming below 1.5 C, according to the report. “Would we be prepared to put our children on a plane with a 50/50 chance they're going to land safely?” Anderson asked. “I think we probably wouldn't … Why is it better to take that risk with their futures?” A recent report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that even if countries act urgently and limit global warming to 1.5 C - the threshold scientists say is necessary to maintain a livable planet - the world will still face “unavoidable” and steadily worsening impacts from climate change over the next two decades. Canada has had a taste of these impacts with the deadly heat wave, floods and wildfires that plagued B.C. last year. Anderson said people in poor countries are already suffering more severe effects of climate change, and warming beyond 1.5 C is “nearly a death sentence.” “Many people are suffering and dying from climate change a long way from the places that are causing the problems like the E.U., the U.K., Canada, the U.S.,” he said. The report found wealthy nations must phase out fossil fuel production well before poorer producing nations for there to be any semblance of an equitable transition. The authors determined how much economic capacity all the fossil fuel producing countries have by calculating each nation’s GDP without oil and gas revenues. Despite being small fossil fuel producers, countries like South Sudan, Congo-Brazzaville and Gabon have little economic revenue apart from oil and gas production, so rapidly removing this income could threaten their political stability and collapse their economies, said Anderson. “For some parts of the world, oil and gas is like 60-odd per cent of their economy. If you remove that … they've almost got nothing left,” he said. Wealthy nations like Canada that are major producers, on the other hand, have very diverse economies and typically remain wealthy even once the oil and gas revenue is removed, said Anderson. For example, the report says Canada’s GDP would remain the 13th highest globally, even without revenue from oil and gas. Oil and gas revenues make up 10 per cent of Canada’s GDP, according to the report, which is “not an insignificant amount, but an amount that's relatively easy for us to replace with other sources,” said Catherine Abreu, founder of Destination Zero and a member of Canada’s Net-Zero Advisory Body. If we “keep up the pretence” that Canada’s oil and gas industry is critical for the country’s economic well-being and it will be “too hard” to transition, “how can we expect anyone else for whom it is actually much more difficult to do it?” asked Abreu. “Canada's plans for fossil fuel expansion (are) the second largest in the world … So Canada is really one of the worst culprits in putting forward plans for this industry that are really out of step with our commitments in the Paris Agreement.” The Canada Energy Regulator says that under the country’s current policies, Canadian oil production is projected to keep increasing and peak in 2040 before declining slightly, while gas production will steadily increase to 40 per cent above current levels by 2050. It does not include any scenarios compatible with achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 or holding to 1.5 C. The phaseout dates in the report were calculated by taking stock of the world’s carbon budget, countries’ total fossil fuel production and their economic ability to phase out coal, oil and gas. Although this method allowed some wiggle room to give poorer countries more time to transition, it is “still not fair for poorer countries” and needs to be paired with “big financial transfers” from wealthy countries, said Anderson. “Our pathways still (are) unfair on the poorer parts of the world if you look at the total emissions per person over the timeframe that we have,” he said. The fact that women, children and people of colour are most impacted by climate change points to a broader issue of racism embedded in climate action, or lack thereof, Anderson added, and the institutional racism that exists in the Global North also manifests itself globally. “We've been highly inequitable to people who have suffered those racial injustices for centuries now and we're just layering another racial injustice on top,” he said. The federal government recently announced that $315 million of Canada’s five-year, $5.3-billion climate finance commitment will be available for organizations in Canada and the Global South to partner on climate adaptation projects, but rich countries - including Canada - are still falling well short of what is needed. At the end of the month, the federal government will unveil its emissions reduction plan, which Abreu says is the first step to acknowledging Canada has to tackle oil and gas sector emissions. This report makes it clear we need to be going beyond that first step and account for the emissions from the oil and gas we export, not just production, said Abreu. The report does not include negative-emissions technologies like carbon capture and storage and nature-based solutions because “they are highly uncertain and speculative, (and) we do not have any examples at scale,” said Anderson. “It's dangerous to assume that it will work when it's that uncertain,” he said, noting the report’s authors still researched negative-emissions technologies but left them out to avoid increasing the carbon budget without a guarantee it is safe to do so. “We always ignore the part of the science that tells us actually, the budgets might be much smaller so your policies need to be much more stringent,” he said. World leaders are gambling if they continue to use more fossil fuels and don’t act urgently to phase them out, he added. “We're playing Russian roulette with our own children's futures,” said Anderson. “That's what we're doing, spinning the chamber with one bullet in it and holding it up to our children's head at breakfast and saying, ‘Shall we be lucky?’”
For the fist time after 15 years I felt cold in Ocrober in Delhi. I give credit to the lockdown. Good thing is that govt is trying to shift towards non-coal base elrectricity generation in less prices compared to the prices in the west. However, the free electricity drive by the Delhi govt will break the very infra of electricity generation and maintenance due to the non-payment of the dues, good luck to Delhi, hope you will be not blackened out due to freebies one day or lakh rupees of bill will not arrive to you
Please provide what 1.2 °c increase of 10% more rainfall means for a 10 year old to understand.. this is full of information but nothing that can make an impact on common ppl
Your analysis doesn't match with reality. Summer in Bihar, jharkand is getting hotter and hotter. Month of September and October was hottest in year 2021, I have ever felt living here.
We're already at 1.1 - 1.3 degrees so it's hard to see 0.2 making a practical difference. Crop yields continue to grow the Earth is greening (CO2 will do that) A bit less hyperbole would be good.
Freeze new big constructions from now, apartments are the most constructed in big cities with most of them having 50percent empty, occupy empty homes first, need more energy efficient nuclear power plants for clean energy generation than our traditional coal based electricity generation. stop diesel vehicles for now - we have more vehicles than roads.
Why does everyone keep taking about the problems. Why nobody cares about the solution? The solution is to work on developing renewables to support everyone
We need to go nuclear, solar and wind and lessen fossil fuels energy generation, and instead of giving india lecture on global warming all this super power country like US and Europe needs to clear misconceptions on nuclear energy and help whole world in development of more durable and better battery which can store electricity better than current batteries we have, but i know they won't cause they only see there pocket from this oil giants
I hope the policy makers will listen to these scientific studies and act to avert calamities. I hope the high level corruptions will not interfere with the proper actions.
Good that solar power is gaining momentum. Need to quickly do water networking in entire country. Water must be used as primary source for cooling. Both Potable and semitreated water should be available everywhere to be utilized for household and irrigation requirements. It will boost agriculture, lower down electricity requirement, reduce flooding, and help our cities cleaner.
In the name of development, unnecessarily four to eight lane highways are being built in many districts where for another two decades definitely so much traffic will not develop. Where around 35 mtrs would suffice, they are expanding to 45 mtrs. Cutting of trees for roads and, industrialization purpose. Most trees remain untouched at roadsides and hence are huge. These leaders have now got a reason to cut these huge trees. Become a lucrative business. They don't care for environment
Putting all the responsibilities on policy makers will be destructive in nature! This is extremely serious challenge, and we don't have time to prepare! It requires exponential contribution for each and every person! We are not living in a idealistic world, If you think that fossil-fuel based economy will be zero in next 2-3 or even 5 years, wake up you are dreaming! If you think govt should do that, well economies will collapse. So many of our livelihood. These changes will take time and lots of investment, so called activist will argue that this this type of model will bring this this benefits and this this lesser damage, in the end its not gonna happen next day, it will take time and until that many livelihood will collapse. we are sitting on a bomb, that is gonna explode. We can try to reduce the effect of it, make it more bearable until we eliminate the challenge. Brining immediate change in our daily life will be more productive way to fight climate change. Using Electricity as much as we really need! Conserve water as much as we can! Even cutting the milk packet's corner differently can help conserve the climate like not cutting it completely removing it, cut it little so that the plastic will be reused. Simple, isn't it? If you wants to go and buy a milk packet from what 100-200 meter far from our home, we choose vehicle over walking! Daily hair wash with shampoo/conditioner is wasting more water than you can imagine, not just by your consumption but also to make those products! Be it soft drinks, or meat processing, fancy leather clothes you are wearing, everything is affecting the climate change! So, if you blame policy makers and sit inside AC room, keeping the AC temp at 16-18 and using blanket coz its too cold inside while the outside temp is 32-36 you are the culprit! Climate change will be best dealt with bottom down approach than top-down! If you think you can't compromise on your daily routine, then don't expect anything from policy makers as well, many will won't like what I said and maybe I am also not changing my life as per the climate change need! We all need to do our bits and that bit is not restricted to a blame game only!
Typical western chauvinism. Just a year or so before Covid, a similar report had come out showing the US and the UK to be "best prepared for a pandemic" ... But we all know what happened when a pandemic actually struck
It's good for Rajasthan and Gujrat to get more rainfall. 1.5 degree more is not that threatening. And other than few more warmer days nothing gonna happen ? This video sucks. Tell us more consequences. Otherwise better sol will be to make infrastructure able to hold more rain. Which can also help with water availability and restoring underground water. Until and unless there is serious consequences we have a lot more pros for continuing like we are.
Subtle... Really.. ROFL And leta do it then... You and me.. ROFL let's have some fun . ROFL oh please don't hold back... ROFL agni astram... Ende vayitilotu viddu...veshunnu vayya... ROFL
It is not only becoming hot but hummid also which is the killer.
Humidity??? Or is this something else??
It's getting colder in South of india - it will stay
@@vinjagvijya yes it is but simultaneously it is also getting hotter in summer
Good for flora and fauna though. Its so dry out here in rajasthan.
Hooray, someone has finally realised that it's water vapour that hears the planet and co2
These videos are supposed to be seen by more people than other viral videos... kudos to down to earth...
Thanks Down to earth team for starting a climate change debate in india. While there's zero coverage of these critical issues in mainstream indian media, channels like these will enlighten the youth about these issue.
Awesome channel. Dire message for policy makers. Cant imagine what wet bulb temperatures would be in Kerala and other coastal areas.
What about cyclones ? Cyclones are hitting Odisha and West Bengal almost each and every year
The mangroves in Sunderbans used to save West Bengal and Odisha from cyclones.But ever since mangroves are destroyed and becoming less and less its becoming a problem.Plus due to global warming Bay of Bengal water is warming up fast and forming depression and cyclones at regular intervals.The only solution to this is to check pollution and plant more and more trees.
They do normally
Nicely covered. Hope you had also covered regarding sea level rise associated with the rise in temp.
Excellent analysis. Thank you! Wondering if there's a model to determine the impact of heat and rainfall increases too. What happens to food, water, health, worker productivity, businesses etc
Heavy labour will become more noctural that is obvious. There will be more pressure on businesses to ensure cooler workplaces.
Cooling water should be used for primary cooling. AC use should be minimized.
Good for India with more rains
Productivity will only decrease due to shifting of amicable bands
It's not only in India but the whole world is facing it. Look at Europe for instance, it is getting warmer year after year and the rivers are drying up. It would be a thought provoking topic to look into.
How many times in the past 100 years has the flow of European rivers been sluggish
over the years europe will enter permafrost rather than warming due to climate change....
Please make a video about how it will impact the flora and fauna, and lives of the vulnerable people.
That's why I have started a startup to counter climate change
What is it any info ?!
Haha haha 😂😂😂😂😂
Ur startup will tame nature😂😂😂😂😂
Nature is beyond controllable but humans need to change which they will not
$tfu@@sumeetpalsingh2125 atleast he is trying
Thanks for the insights .I am closely connected to the cause & I want to work with you down to earth to contribute in preserving earth.
Don't use Internet.
@@PalnaduTV wtf
@7:10, how come the climate risk map ranks Bangladesh as having very low risk index!!
Bangladesh temperature won't rise up much. Bit since the country is small and has too many people, and overall is low lying area prone to sea level rise, its problematic overall.
Quite useful analysis. Thanks D2E😊
The quality of the voice recording is pretty bad. It's often hard to detect when the sentence is ending or continuing
Superb video. This is what I was looking for. A prediction of future crisis.
Thank you Down to Earth team
Is it just me Or the states of eastern India recording
Unfortunately the Narrator and Supposed Climate Expert missed the "known fact" that Land Areas warm 2X - 4X the GAT. The GAT (Global Average Temperature is actually the Ocean Surface Temperature. So 1.5'c will mean 6'c on Land Areas.
Kerala will face severe rainfall cus of ghats, less snow falls & melting glaciers lower regions will face floods
Global average may look very low increase, but but keep in mind north & south pole have upto -50c tempratures.
Bangalore already feels hot in Feb 2023
PLz ameliorate the the direction in the tropical easterly jet stream, 7;00 onwards video clip. Animation is showing direction of westerly.
Very interesting and distressing at the same time
Do explain why the coldest states in Bharat (India) will experience highest temperature increase ?
Water has a higher melting point, boiling point, heat of vaporization, heat of fusion, and surface tension than such comparable hydrides as Hydrogen Sulphide and Ammonia or, for that matter, than most common liquids. All these properties indicate that the forces of attraction between the molecules in liquid water, and thus its internal cohesion, are relatively high.
~ Albert L. Lehninger,( Biochemistry), 2nd Edition
This also means that global warming can cause flooding, if, the temperatures are incredibly high and start exceeding the heat of vaporization of water remarkably.
The solution is in the hands of people .
Government alone can't tackle this problem.
People should be ready for eco friendly lifestyle.
I remember last august in Chennai feels like temp (not true temp) hit 56 C in my phne weather app
Nothing happens to Karnataka?
The report highlighted the worst affected.
North Karnataka will feel the heat
Karnataka and Maharashtra do not exist for Down To Earth.
@@solarhoney Madhya pradesh, Telangana was also not mentioned, what is your point?
Many parts of Karnataka are on high Deccan plateau. So it will not be so hot during summer except few parts
What about karnataka how much will the precip increase?
It's raining here in Rajasthan in the month of May 2023.
Your report is largely biased because it doesn't say anything about several states & what's going to happen to them in terms of temperature & precipitation increases - Goa, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Maharashtra, MP, UP etc. I feel that your data is skewed & only talks about northwestern or northeastern states, but not the ones missed out.
All people commenting doesnt even have 2 trees in their home, maybe only 10% of you do, other dont. I doubt even the make of the videos have any place for trees in their home. Start with yourselves first.
Oh yes i will as soon our association allow planting two large trees in out flat. 🤦♂
Mate it's not the people you should be blaming here but the government. City planning and it's management dictates how people built their own home. Add our government's silence on property price and how we are having less and less single family homes, even if they exist for the current price not many are rich enough to leave space for a large tree.
The arctic is warming faster than the rest of the world.They are already at 2C of warming.There they are experiencing some periods that are 20 to 30C above average temperatures.If this were to happen in India just imagine the devastation.
Nothing will happen to Bharat, others need to worry about.
How to i get temperature data for 10 years and above for specific place?
Dr. Guy McPherson discusses the peer reviewed studies that show we are already past 1.5C, and that devastating climate change is no longer reversible. Is he wrong?
To limit global warming, rich countries like Canada must end oil and gas production by 2034: report -----------------
For the world to have a shot at limiting global warming to 1.5 C, Canada and other wealthy fossil fuel producing nations need to stop all production by 2034, according to a new report.
The reduction in greenhouse gas emissions required to secure a livable future is “far more challenging” than any global leader is prepared to acknowledge, said Kevin Anderson, one of the authors of the report and a professor of energy and climate change at the University of Manchester. Emissions from fossil fuels are one of the main drivers of human-caused climate change.
Published on March 21, the report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development proposes different phaseout dates for oil and gas producing countries by grouping them according to their differing wealth, development and economic reliance on fossil fuels.
It found there isn’t room for any country in the world to increase fossil fuel production, and wealthy countries like Canada, the U.S. and the U.K. must be the first to end production to give smaller, poorer nations an equitable transition and provide them with financial support. The richest countries, which produce over a third of the world’s oil and gas, must cut output by 74 per cent by 2030 while the poorest, which supply just one ninth of global demand, must cut back by 14 per cent.
If wealthy countries end fossil fuel production by 2034, middle-income countries by 2043 and the poorest countries by 2050, the world will have a 50 per cent chance of keeping global warming below 1.5 C, according to the report.
“Would we be prepared to put our children on a plane with a 50/50 chance they're going to land safely?” Anderson asked. “I think we probably wouldn't … Why is it better to take that risk with their futures?”
A recent report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that even if countries act urgently and limit global warming to 1.5 C - the threshold scientists say is necessary to maintain a livable planet - the world will still face “unavoidable” and steadily worsening impacts from climate change over the next two decades.
Canada has had a taste of these impacts with the deadly heat wave, floods and wildfires that plagued B.C. last year. Anderson said people in poor countries are already suffering more severe effects of climate change, and warming beyond 1.5 C is “nearly a death sentence.”
“Many people are suffering and dying from climate change a long way from the places that are causing the problems like the E.U., the U.K., Canada, the U.S.,” he said.
The report found wealthy nations must phase out fossil fuel production well before poorer producing nations for there to be any semblance of an equitable transition.
The authors determined how much economic capacity all the fossil fuel producing countries have by calculating each nation’s GDP without oil and gas revenues.
Despite being small fossil fuel producers, countries like South Sudan, Congo-Brazzaville and Gabon have little economic revenue apart from oil and gas production, so rapidly removing this income could threaten their political stability and collapse their economies, said Anderson.
“For some parts of the world, oil and gas is like 60-odd per cent of their economy. If you remove that … they've almost got nothing left,” he said.
Wealthy nations like Canada that are major producers, on the other hand, have very diverse economies and typically remain wealthy even once the oil and gas revenue is removed, said Anderson.
For example, the report says Canada’s GDP would remain the 13th highest globally, even without revenue from oil and gas.
Oil and gas revenues make up 10 per cent of Canada’s GDP, according to the report, which is “not an insignificant amount, but an amount that's relatively easy for us to replace with other sources,” said Catherine Abreu, founder of Destination Zero and a member of Canada’s Net-Zero Advisory Body.
If we “keep up the pretence” that Canada’s oil and gas industry is critical for the country’s economic well-being and it will be “too hard” to transition, “how can we expect anyone else for whom it is actually much more difficult to do it?” asked Abreu.
“Canada's plans for fossil fuel expansion (are) the second largest in the world … So Canada is really one of the worst culprits in putting forward plans for this industry that are really out of step with our commitments in the Paris Agreement.”
The Canada Energy Regulator says that under the country’s current policies, Canadian oil production is projected to keep increasing and peak in 2040 before declining slightly, while gas production will steadily increase to 40 per cent above current levels by 2050. It does not include any scenarios compatible with achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 or holding to 1.5 C.
The phaseout dates in the report were calculated by taking stock of the world’s carbon budget, countries’ total fossil fuel production and their economic ability to phase out coal, oil and gas. Although this method allowed some wiggle room to give poorer countries more time to transition, it is “still not fair for poorer countries” and needs to be paired with “big financial transfers” from wealthy countries, said Anderson.
“Our pathways still (are) unfair on the poorer parts of the world if you look at the total emissions per person over the timeframe that we have,” he said. The fact that women, children and people of colour are most impacted by climate change points to a broader issue of racism embedded in climate action, or lack thereof, Anderson added, and the institutional racism that exists in the Global North also manifests itself globally.
“We've been highly inequitable to people who have suffered those racial injustices for centuries now and we're just layering another racial injustice on top,” he said.
The federal government recently announced that $315 million of Canada’s five-year, $5.3-billion climate finance commitment will be available for organizations in Canada and the Global South to partner on climate adaptation projects, but rich countries - including Canada - are still falling well short of what is needed.
At the end of the month, the federal government will unveil its emissions reduction plan, which Abreu says is the first step to acknowledging Canada has to tackle oil and gas sector emissions. This report makes it clear we need to be going beyond that first step and account for the emissions from the oil and gas we export, not just production, said Abreu.
The report does not include negative-emissions technologies like carbon capture and storage and nature-based solutions because “they are highly uncertain and speculative, (and) we do not have any examples at scale,” said Anderson.
“It's dangerous to assume that it will work when it's that uncertain,” he said, noting the report’s authors still researched negative-emissions technologies but left them out to avoid increasing the carbon budget without a guarantee it is safe to do so.
“We always ignore the part of the science that tells us actually, the budgets might be much smaller so your policies need to be much more stringent,” he said.
World leaders are gambling if they continue to use more fossil fuels and don’t act urgently to phase them out, he added.
“We're playing Russian roulette with our own children's futures,” said Anderson. “That's what we're doing, spinning the chamber with one bullet in it and holding it up to our children's head at breakfast and saying, ‘Shall we be lucky?’”
For the fist time after 15 years I felt cold in Ocrober in Delhi. I give credit to the lockdown. Good thing is that govt is trying to shift towards non-coal base elrectricity generation in less prices compared to the prices in the west.
However, the free electricity drive by the Delhi govt will break the very infra of electricity generation and maintenance due to the non-payment of the dues, good luck to Delhi, hope you will be not blackened out due to freebies one day or lakh rupees of bill will not arrive to you
Sadly the reality is you are much more likely to see a 3 C change not 1.5.
Maharashtra comes in India right? What about Maharashtra.
Please provide what 1.2 °c increase of 10% more rainfall means for a 10 year old to understand.. this is full of information but nothing that can make an impact on common ppl
It will be bad but we have to adjust
It means MH, KA AND MP will not be affected whatsoever? Interesting
Your analysis doesn't match with reality.
Summer in Bihar, jharkand is getting hotter and hotter. Month of September and October was hottest in year 2021, I have ever felt living here.
Every metro city should install air scrubbers mandatorily.
We must consciously do something like more afforestation and making artificial water ways to keep the earth cool.
Waw it's Gotta be Streamy
We're already at 1.1 - 1.3 degrees so it's hard to see 0.2 making a practical difference. Crop yields continue to grow the Earth is greening (CO2 will do that) A bit less hyperbole would be good.
SIR.what about karnataka and other South states.
sea level rise is the issue for coastal states
We're going into a mini Ice Age, best to prepare warm pajamas and housing for your elephants.
Freeze new big constructions from now, apartments are the most constructed in big cities with most of them having 50percent empty, occupy empty homes first, need more energy efficient nuclear power plants for clean energy generation than our traditional coal based electricity generation. stop diesel vehicles for now - we have more vehicles than roads.
Fear the cold, worship the warmth. Far more people die from cold related deaths than heatwaves.
Hummid and hot temp in india day by day man i am exaggerated with headache and vomiting
Wonder why Antarctica is growing?
In India govt cut million trees for making roads 😁
Why does everyone keep taking about the problems. Why nobody cares about the solution? The solution is to work on developing renewables to support everyone
What will happen to the WORLD at 1.5C? We're at 1.2C now, and look how bad it is around the world!
We need to go nuclear, solar and wind and lessen fossil fuels energy generation, and instead of giving india lecture on global warming all this super power country like US and Europe needs to clear misconceptions on nuclear energy and help whole world in development of more durable and better battery which can store electricity better than current batteries we have, but i know they won't cause they only see there pocket from this oil giants
We welcome city people of India to the hill stations for holidays .
I hope the policy makers will listen to these scientific studies and act to avert calamities. I hope the high level corruptions will not interfere with the proper actions.
Good that solar power is gaining momentum.
Need to quickly do water networking in entire country.
Water must be used as primary source for cooling.
Both Potable and semitreated water should be available everywhere to be utilized for household and irrigation requirements. It will boost agriculture, lower down electricity requirement, reduce flooding, and help our cities cleaner.
Thank god people of Karnataka are invincible from global warming.😐
What will happen to Africa , SA and Australia in not imaginable so dont worry world will adopt
karnataka is safe 😍🤗🤫
Jai Karnataka.
1.5 degree? What is going to happen in Kerala, we will get more rains and floods.
We all are going to die. Only god can save us
This is kalyug. We just have to suffer.
You have ample Ice for a glass of Whiskey
end is nearing
it's raining here
In the name of development, unnecessarily four to eight lane highways are being built in many districts where for another two decades definitely so much traffic will not develop. Where around 35 mtrs would suffice, they are expanding to 45 mtrs. Cutting of trees for roads and, industrialization purpose. Most trees remain untouched at roadsides and hence are huge. These leaders have now got a reason to cut these huge trees. Become a lucrative business. They don't care for environment
People be like: Mai lakh rupay ke crackers jalaunga. Mujhe ghanta farak padhta
We can do it in a controlled way.
not going to make it as a religious issue but beef and other meat and dairy is highly carbon intensive and yea we should stop crackers.
Lot of trees need to be planted and relying on chemical products on daily lives shud be reduced considerably, that's the only solution
Putting all the responsibilities on policy makers will be destructive in nature! This is extremely serious challenge, and we don't have time to prepare! It requires exponential contribution for each and every person! We are not living in a idealistic world, If you think that fossil-fuel based economy will be zero in next 2-3 or even 5 years, wake up you are dreaming! If you think govt should do that, well economies will collapse. So many of our livelihood. These changes will take time and lots of investment, so called activist will argue that this this type of model will bring this this benefits and this this lesser damage, in the end its not gonna happen next day, it will take time and until that many livelihood will collapse. we are sitting on a bomb, that is gonna explode. We can try to reduce the effect of it, make it more bearable until we eliminate the challenge. Brining immediate change in our daily life will be more productive way to fight climate change. Using Electricity as much as we really need! Conserve water as much as we can! Even cutting the milk packet's corner differently can help conserve the climate like not cutting it completely removing it, cut it little so that the plastic will be reused. Simple, isn't it? If you wants to go and buy a milk packet from what 100-200 meter far from our home, we choose vehicle over walking! Daily hair wash with shampoo/conditioner is wasting more water than you can imagine, not just by your consumption but also to make those products! Be it soft drinks, or meat processing, fancy leather clothes you are wearing, everything is affecting the climate change! So, if you blame policy makers and sit inside AC room, keeping the AC temp at 16-18 and using blanket coz its too cold inside while the outside temp is 32-36 you are the culprit! Climate change will be best dealt with bottom down approach than top-down! If you think you can't compromise on your daily routine, then don't expect anything from policy makers as well, many will won't like what I said and maybe I am also not changing my life as per the climate change need! We all need to do our bits and that bit is not restricted to a blame game only!
Modi won’t do anything to stop climate change
1.5 will be breached without a doubt. 2.5- 3 is where we will be by 2050
People are not willing to act to stop it
Should India buy some land from Russia?
Stop coal extraction
And change to bio diesel polution free vehicles
even if there is only one diseased human left, policymakers (elected or otherwise) will worship money.
I think one day we become dianosures
Stop doing all with machines, try doing it manually or humanly
🙏🏼🙏🏼
The Ganges is drying up, due to evaporation
What
Act now or suffer later.
People are ready to suffer later cause they will not act now
This won't happen
About the germanwatch report....it's rubbish by the way.
Typical western chauvinism. Just a year or so before Covid, a similar report had come out showing the US and the UK to be "best prepared for a pandemic" ... But we all know what happened when a pandemic actually struck
No it's real
PeolesdestroyednaturenaturewillnotsparedesyroypeoplesofworldEveryactionshasequalandoppositereactionsNewTon3rdlaw
Plant more trees.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's good for Rajasthan and Gujrat to get more rainfall. 1.5 degree more is not that threatening. And other than few more warmer days nothing gonna happen ? This video sucks. Tell us more consequences. Otherwise better sol will be to make infrastructure able to hold more rain. Which can also help with water availability and restoring underground water. Until and unless there is serious consequences we have a lot more pros for continuing like we are.
Subtle... Really.. ROFL
And leta do it then... You and me.. ROFL let's have some fun . ROFL oh please don't hold back... ROFL agni astram... Ende vayitilotu viddu...veshunnu vayya... ROFL