When I was growing up my grandfather used to say to me: "Avoid status symbols like the plague." Not wanting the plague, I avoid status symbols to this day.
Having owned and own rolex, its a nice watch, it also requires maintenance like a ferrari which is annoying. I dont wear a watch anymore except for black tie events where i wear a rollie
My Rolex is an Oyster of approx. 1941 vintage..... the dealer wasn't able to determine exactly. I bought mine at a household auction, got into a pissing mach with another guy and ended up paying $151 I think. Got the watch after paying, and it was old, abused, neglected and almost junk. Got it sent into Rolex and they sent it back looking like new for $560.-ish. This was 1990-1992 ish. Now I have a Rolex that no one else does !!!!!!
Are there any under 40mm that aren't trying desperately to be the center of attention? That's been my biggest issue with Bulova as a whole. Much of the modern stuff tries too hard and is thoroughly stuck in a 00's shopping mall.
@@waffle911 Yikes!! I just looked on the Bulova website, and I saw what you are saying. I looked on Amazon and could only find one (classy) Precisionist watch that I purchased five to ten years ago (Bulova Men's 98B156 Precisionist Champagne dial Watch). This is a shame! I really like the Precisionist movement but in a subtle, classy body.
I have worn the Burberry The City Chronograph watch, which I have had for over 10 years and still one of my favorites for every day use (working in the ER with repeated hand washing), back then was $500, but probably discontinued; the metal band and beveled links gives it a sparkle when light strikes the wrist. Substantial in weight but timeless without robbing your wallet.
I love that the first alt shown is a Casio Duro. I have 3 of them myself. Awesome work watches. I purchased my Milgauss solely for the anti-electric function and that sexy second hand.
Not sure why it wasn’t mentioned, but the Tudor Black Bay 58 is the Rolex Submariner by another name. I know Tudor was already mentioned for the GMT, but Omega was already mentioned for the Datejust. Definitely should have gotten a reference for the above $1K category.
Good contribution, Vincenzo! With videos like these, we always aim for as much variety as possible, and realize that other enthusiasts will chip in with suggestions in the comments! 😊
If you are keen on quality watches but don’t want to part with the cash it is worth checking out vintage watch stores. Most larger cities have them. Pick a reputable one. Many even provide warranties and offer great advice. You can get most high end brands for less than half of new price. We are talking about watches that are cleaned and serviced and will last a lifetime. Avoid pawnshops because provenance is sketchy sometimes. Also buying online is risky because you don’t want to spend big bucks and discover the band doesn’t fit your wrist. Recently purchased a Tag 2000 series. Paid $800 and I swear looks brand new. Seen them cheaper on eBay but you don’t always know what you’re buying. Anyway it’s worth considering
Grand Seiko crafts spectacular watches, with breath-taking precision that makes Swiss watchmakers weep and the most beautiful faces in the world. Delighted to see one mentioned here.
As an OP alternative, let me propose the Seiko SNXS79. An automatic watch that goes for under $200, and has a look that matches the discontinued OP 39MM with the rhodium dial. I have one and would recommend it!
It's funny, I'm big into Omega. it started as getting alternatives to Rolex, but at this point I don't think I'd trade my collection at all for Rolex's offerings - even though I still think they're classic.
I learned this lesson early from my uncle: he is wealthy enough to easily afford Rolex watches but he is not one to front for the sake of posturing. And he always said there are cheaper options with just as great a movement and design - so why would he waste money? Since then, I have only bought Seikos which have yet to disappoint me.
I wear a blue Duro every day. Just changed the awful rubber strap for a nice leather one. If it dies today, I’m going back to Walmart to replace it. I think it was a fuzz over $50.
I would rather have a Breitling Chronomat Automatic as a substitute for the Justdate. Swiss made, 36-40mm case, elegant, many combinations of dials, faces, and straps, and still enough of a status symbol for anyone familiar with the brand. While Rolex is synonymous with sailing, Breitling is synonymous with aviation. The AVI line would be my choice in a chronograph watch. They’re big, but still stylish in a more casual setting and the high contrast face is large allowing it to be much easier read than their gimicky Navitimer, especially while flying.
The obvious choice for a chrono is the Omega Speedmaster which is one of the most iconic chronographs ever made. I get it though, it you wanted to you could put an Omega in every category to compete with Rolex with the GMT being the only exception as Omega tends to put GMT functions on existing models for the most part and no real GMT line.
Not really a watch enthusiast but a Timex Easy Reader works for me. I used to have a couple pocket watches but ended up donating them which I do regret now. Appreciate the content as always.
@@vinzenzboman607 I never had any waistcoats so honestly I never really got to try them on properly. I just got them as gifts as I have been pretty fascinated with pocket watches. Perhaps someday if I do decide to get a couple new ones I could try on a vest that would work well but in a more casual fabric rather than a full suit. Any decent choices for casual vests? Perhaps Tweed or Corduroy nothing formal. Thanks for the response.
I don't know if I am the only but this is a video I think needs to be done. If it already is then please point me to it. I am 28 (soon to be 29) and these last few weeks I have been going through some changes in my mental. I swapped to wet shaving and now love shaving (thanks to this cannel, Kirby Allison, and shave nation), I use beard balms and oils along with soon to be beard butters. All this has combined to make me rethink my image which was very no F's given. I would wear whatever I had around that was clean. That all being said gentlemens gazette has really inspired me to look into the 1920's-1970's dressware and things alike because I just love that dapper or gentlemens wardrobe style. I want to now get into casual dressware, business/ professional dressware. I know this is going to take a long time and even years of investment to get into this dressware style. I don't mind the transition taking a long time so long as I can get there before I turn say 35. With ALL of that being said. Where do I even start the transition. Shirts? Pants? Shoes? There's so many things to account for after watching so many videos from this channel. It would honestly be alot easier to make this decision with some help from you folks by making a "how to transition your wardrobe" video. I don't have alot of money I can just drop at once so having thar kind of video would help me decide what kind of pieces of clothing I should be looking to first
Thanks for your support, Helix! I get where you're coming from with your video idea. The tricky part is that everyone will be transitioning their wardrobe from a different starting point, so it's possible to make a video that appeals to a small group of people, but it won't be relevant for the majority. This is why we've made previous videos such as our tips for dressing on a budget - this could be the best place to start for you! www.gentlemansgazette.com/gentleman-dress-suit-budget-15-tips-guide/?
@@gentlemansgazette I appreciate the links! Some of them I did find just after digging through the plethora of videos on here (not a bad thing). I've been spending some hours just watching videos and taking note. I haven't been getting burnt out because I really am enjoying the wealth of knowledge you and the others have. I really loved the 15 tips and 3 dress shoes videos because I think they are a great set to help someone decide where to start with their capsule wardrobe. I love all of you at gentlemens gazette and will continue to support this channel. Thank you for being here and keeping this look alive! P.S is it possible to rock a ponytail with this style? Me and my wife both don't want me to cut my hair.
I am very happy of my Orient Bambinos (3 of them), particularly the small seconds one. If I had the cash to splash, I'd buy a Longines Heritage (Flagship or Conquest).
They are good watches, a bambino was my first watch and at first I was pleased with it, but after discovering the vintage watch market I don't wear mine anymore. For the price of a bambino you can buy a vintage swiss watch and get it serviced, and you'll have a much higher attention to details, a wonderful and precise swiss movement, and a readonable case size instead of the huge 40 mm.
Let's see... Steinhart produce great alternatives for the Submariner and GMT Master 2. In addition they have vintage style models which would be very difficult to obtain. Long Island watch make a great alternative to the datejust. As for the daytona, I would look at Seiko Speed timer. Another GMT pick is the Baltic Aquascaphe GMT
They were avoiding homages, so no Steinhart, and Islander Brookville might still be too close for comfort. Yes to the Seiko Speedtimer and Aquascaphe GMT, though.
I don’t wear wrist watches, I have two Tissot pocket watches, both mechanical wind. In my opinion, this is the only way to carry classic time on your body.
There are alot of good Swiss watches out there you may have never heard of mines a Candino Chronograph the motor actually a Tag Huer, its a well-built rectangular watch everything luxury for under 500€ Try the whole Certina group as well as Glycine, Mondaine some less than your average Seiko but not as well known in the US as here in Europe. Breitling watches for a little more are loved even by the critics.
Wouldn't the Air King be entry-level? Still costly but I always thought the Air King was their entry-level timepiece. Absolutely love my Omega Seamaster, found a lightly used 007 Seamaster from Tomorrow Never Dies and will be passed down to my son when I'm gone.
Not wanting to get into the price points of Rolex I have acquired several of the models you used as examples in your video. Over the years I have acquired the Omega Aqua Terra, Tag Heuer Aquaracer, Omega Speedtimer, and most recently the Tudor GMT(Pepsi). Love them all but all are so much less that Rolex. A few of them, I think are equal in quality to Rolex in both design and function. Not sure if I will ever get a Rolex, maybe for retirement, yea, a nice gold Datejust, or not.
The funny thing is that I actually think the Omegas are better looking than the Rolex in a lot of these. Ill take a Seamaster over a Submariner any day!
I have two watches than looks almost like a Rolex submariner and a Rolex datejust the submariner alike is gold pleated and the datejust alike is in stainless steel the brand is max time at is like 99 percent cheaper than a Rolex obviusly isnt the same quality and beautiful as a true Rolex but they got the soul of the Rolex watches
Looking through their current catalogs, anything either brand has that could be comparable in style to a Rolex tends to have much larger or more awkward proportions that don't wear as elegantly, and the stuff that is well-proportioned isn't directly comparable.
I've got the tissot gentleman powermatic 80 silicium (in blue), not even remotely close to rolex caliber, but I'm sure it's style will stay priceless for my entire life.
The timex is such a bad alternative to the datejust... owning a watch that is only a bad copy of another one looks cheap, if you can't get the rolex just buy something else but with its own personality, the hamilton, omega and grand seiko are all good choices (even though I prefer swiss watches, so I don't think I'd pick the grand seiko) and there are lots of other good swiss houses (my favourite is longines since it as a good quality and an accessible price). Also as a lover of vintage watches I prefer buying old swiss watches at a fraction of their price and then get them serviced, the older designs go perfectly well with classic menswear outfits and you'll have at your wrist something different from everyone else.
Rolex is the KING, heritage, and is an actual watch that does why it’s supposed to. With that said I agree with alternatives, but I do not like the copycat theory. Might as well save for what you really want.
Agree on Orient. I have a Submariner that I love, but the my Orient Kamasu is also a great watch. I have a handful of different straps that make it fun and stylish.
Right now probably the only Rolex that I'd buy might be the Rolex Submariner.....although that also has competition. Rolex is losing its "dope factor" or "cool factor" to me. It used to be a professional's watch. Now it tries to be aa rich man's watch but it will never get close to the "Holy Trinity" or Audemars Piquet, Patek Philippe or Vacheron Constantin.
There seems to be a misunderstanding. They were introducing alternatives *to* the Datejust. They introduce the Rolex model first, then the alternatives.
I'm personally very fond of a lot of low end Chinese watch brands, yes they are on the homage side, not copies or knockoffs, but at the same time Rolex doesn't own the rights these watch sizes and shapes. I'm actually thinking about buying a Pegani GMT watch rn
Not to be negative, but the premise of this video is somewhat useless. People aren't buying a Rolex because they're stylish; they buy them because of the brand and status symbol. If you want a Rolex, you're better off skipping these alternatives and just saving up for an actual (gently used) Rolex. TL;DR There are no alternatives to status symbols.
Fed is always class! Nice video gentleman. I have been lucky enough to have owned a 2015 sub and a datejust from 1988. Both no longer with me as the money was needed for house. My Seiko will do just fine until I can move back into the luxury tier.
Yes. If you want to wear a Rolex, you need to commit to the image. Wear tailored clothing, drive a nice car, live in a nice house, etc. People will see through you very quickly if you're "watch poor".
@@jesusmgw I know that "affordable" and "espensive" are relative, but dang! calling a Rolex Explorer affordable is either out of touch or I'm really poorer than I thought!
Surely being able to sell your products without even trying due to your reputation constitutes incredible marketing? The products and reputation market themselves
The company's *reputation* was built entirely on marketing stunts and half-truths masquerading as innovation, and are the largest watchmaker by volume in Switzerland despite pricing and availability-because the demand for Rolex above all others is just that ludicrously high. They are possibly the finest example of successful marketing on the planet, and Apple is right up there with them. Reputation is marketing. Marketing is reputation. They go hand-in-hand.
My * "expensive" / collectable watch is my Luminox 3500. I bought it new, @ 1/2 price, as a "shelf model." That said, I've been a Seiko fan most of my life. but actually favor Timex.
Rolex is an overrated brand, they are made for people that has money and knows nothing about watches. there are far better (in so many ways) options out there.
It's an awkward price range where not a lot of direct Rolex alternatives end up. Loads of other unique and interesting stuff, though, and much of it is German.
When I was growing up my grandfather used to say to me: "Avoid status symbols like the plague." Not wanting the plague, I avoid status symbols to this day.
Having owned and own rolex, its a nice watch, it also requires maintenance like a ferrari which is annoying. I dont wear a watch anymore except for black tie events where i wear a rollie
Look, your gramps is right, but apart form status symbol, rolexes are very durable and good quality
I wouldn't mind ONE Rolex someday but i really like watches
My Rolex is an Oyster of approx. 1941 vintage..... the dealer wasn't able to determine exactly. I bought mine at a household auction, got into a pissing mach with another guy and ended up paying $151 I think. Got the watch after paying, and it was old, abused, neglected and almost junk. Got it sent into Rolex and they sent it back looking like new for $560.-ish. This was 1990-1992 ish. Now I have a Rolex that no one else does !!!!!!
you should make a video
Thanks for introducing me to watches! I really love the way chronographs look. Both the Rotary and Yema watches are definetly pieces I want to own!
It's our pleasure, Akira! Glad to be with you on your watch-collecting journey 😀
I love my Bulova Precisionist watches. They are well-made and battery powered. The second hand sweeps with 16 beats per second.
Are there any under 40mm that aren't trying desperately to be the center of attention? That's been my biggest issue with Bulova as a whole. Much of the modern stuff tries too hard and is thoroughly stuck in a 00's shopping mall.
@@waffle911 Yikes!! I just looked on the Bulova website, and I saw what you are saying. I looked on Amazon and could only find one (classy) Precisionist watch that I purchased five to ten years ago (Bulova Men's 98B156 Precisionist Champagne dial Watch). This is a shame! I really like the Precisionist movement but in a subtle, classy body.
I'm still crazy about Raphael's wearing a red and a blue cufflink to match the GMT. Style through and through.
I have worn the Burberry The City Chronograph watch, which I have had for over 10 years and still one of my favorites for every day use (working in the ER with repeated hand washing), back then was $500, but probably discontinued; the metal band and beveled links gives it a sparkle when light strikes the wrist. Substantial in weight but timeless without robbing your wallet.
I love that the first alt shown is a Casio Duro. I have 3 of them myself. Awesome work watches. I purchased my Milgauss solely for the anti-electric function and that sexy second hand.
Thanks a lot. I want the Submariner Starbucks soooo bad but 15k at 16 is a crazy price, so Casio Duro is perfect
Seiko watches u mentioned all are discontinued 😢
Not sure why it wasn’t mentioned, but the Tudor Black Bay 58 is the Rolex Submariner by another name. I know Tudor was already mentioned for the GMT, but Omega was already mentioned for the Datejust. Definitely should have gotten a reference for the above $1K category.
Good contribution, Vincenzo! With videos like these, we always aim for as much variety as possible, and realize that other enthusiasts will chip in with suggestions in the comments! 😊
If you are keen on quality watches but don’t want to part with the cash it is worth checking out vintage watch stores. Most larger cities have them. Pick a reputable one. Many even provide warranties and offer great advice. You can get most high end brands for less than half of new price. We are talking about watches that are cleaned and serviced and will last a lifetime.
Avoid pawnshops because provenance is sketchy sometimes. Also buying online is risky because you don’t want to spend big bucks and discover the band doesn’t fit your wrist.
Recently purchased a Tag 2000 series. Paid $800 and I swear looks brand new. Seen them cheaper on eBay but you don’t always know what you’re buying.
Anyway it’s worth considering
Grand Seiko crafts spectacular watches, with breath-taking precision that makes Swiss watchmakers weep and the most beautiful faces in the world. Delighted to see one mentioned here.
As an OP alternative, let me propose the Seiko SNXS79.
An automatic watch that goes for under $200, and has a look that matches the discontinued OP 39MM with the rhodium dial. I have one and would recommend it!
Love those they’re just tough to find!
It's funny, I'm big into Omega. it started as getting alternatives to Rolex, but at this point I don't think I'd trade my collection at all for Rolex's offerings - even though I still think they're classic.
Surprisingly solid list.
Why surprisingly?
@@gentlemansgazette I suppose because you're not known for being primarily a watch channel. And not many people know Nathan is a watch nerd.
I learned this lesson early from my uncle: he is wealthy enough to easily afford Rolex watches but he is not one to front for the sake of posturing. And he always said there are cheaper options with just as great a movement and design - so why would he waste money?
Since then, I have only bought Seikos which have yet to disappoint me.
When Rolex came out in 1905 they were made in London, they went to Switzerland in (i believe) 1919
I wear a blue Duro every day. Just changed the awful rubber strap for a nice leather one. If it dies today, I’m going back to Walmart to replace it. I think it was a fuzz over $50.
Haven't seen a Duro at Walmart in years, you'd need to get it off Amazon.
Just replace the battery for $5 and you won't waste your watch
Finally you corrected yourself in terms of replica and homage watches, good job Nathan
I know this is an older video, but a great alternative is the Seiko 5 Ref SRPE. Solid watch and very stylish!
where can you find the timex legacy watch in brick and mortar stores?
These recommendations are right on the money- great job!
I'm surprised you didn't include the seagull 1963, it's such a good watch for the money!
I think that skipping over the Cellini was a mistake!
I'm good with my peasant 100$ Skagen/Invicta/La Coste/CK collection
I would rather have a Breitling Chronomat Automatic as a substitute for the Justdate. Swiss made, 36-40mm case, elegant, many combinations of dials, faces, and straps, and still enough of a status symbol for anyone familiar with the brand. While Rolex is synonymous with sailing, Breitling is synonymous with aviation. The AVI line would be my choice in a chronograph watch. They’re big, but still stylish in a more casual setting and the high contrast face is large allowing it to be much easier read than their gimicky Navitimer, especially while flying.
The obvious choice for a chrono is the Omega Speedmaster which is one of the most iconic chronographs ever made. I get it though, it you wanted to you could put an Omega in every category to compete with Rolex with the GMT being the only exception as Omega tends to put GMT functions on existing models for the most part and no real GMT line.
Not really a watch enthusiast but a Timex Easy Reader works for me. I used to have a couple pocket watches but ended up donating them which I do regret now. Appreciate the content as always.
How did you wear your pocket watches?
Did you wear it with your suite?
@@vinzenzboman607 I never had any waistcoats so honestly I never really got to try them on properly. I just got them as gifts as I have been pretty fascinated with pocket watches. Perhaps someday if I do decide to get a couple new ones I could try on a vest that would work well but in a more casual fabric rather than a full suit. Any decent choices for casual vests? Perhaps Tweed or Corduroy nothing formal. Thanks for the response.
I don't know if I am the only but this is a video I think needs to be done. If it already is then please point me to it.
I am 28 (soon to be 29) and these last few weeks I have been going through some changes in my mental. I swapped to wet shaving and now love shaving (thanks to this cannel, Kirby Allison, and shave nation), I use beard balms and oils along with soon to be beard butters. All this has combined to make me rethink my image which was very no F's given. I would wear whatever I had around that was clean.
That all being said gentlemens gazette has really inspired me to look into the 1920's-1970's dressware and things alike because I just love that dapper or gentlemens wardrobe style. I want to now get into casual dressware, business/ professional dressware.
I know this is going to take a long time and even years of investment to get into this dressware style. I don't mind the transition taking a long time so long as I can get there before I turn say 35.
With ALL of that being said. Where do I even start the transition. Shirts? Pants? Shoes? There's so many things to account for after watching so many videos from this channel. It would honestly be alot easier to make this decision with some help from you folks by making a "how to transition your wardrobe" video.
I don't have alot of money I can just drop at once so having thar kind of video would help me decide what kind of pieces of clothing I should be looking to first
Thanks for your support, Helix! I get where you're coming from with your video idea. The tricky part is that everyone will be transitioning their wardrobe from a different starting point, so it's possible to make a video that appeals to a small group of people, but it won't be relevant for the majority. This is why we've made previous videos such as our tips for dressing on a budget - this could be the best place to start for you! www.gentlemansgazette.com/gentleman-dress-suit-budget-15-tips-guide/?
@@gentlemansgazette I appreciate the links! Some of them I did find just after digging through the plethora of videos on here (not a bad thing). I've been spending some hours just watching videos and taking note. I haven't been getting burnt out because I really am enjoying the wealth of knowledge you and the others have. I really loved the 15 tips and 3 dress shoes videos because I think they are a great set to help someone decide where to start with their capsule wardrobe.
I love all of you at gentlemens gazette and will continue to support this channel. Thank you for being here and keeping this look alive!
P.S is it possible to rock a ponytail with this style? Me and my wife both don't want me to cut my hair.
I am very happy of my Orient Bambinos (3 of them), particularly the small seconds one. If I had the cash to splash, I'd buy a Longines Heritage (Flagship or Conquest).
I have 3 Orient watches, and am crazy pleased with them. Outstanding quality for the price.
They are good watches, a bambino was my first watch and at first I was pleased with it, but after discovering the vintage watch market I don't wear mine anymore. For the price of a bambino you can buy a vintage swiss watch and get it serviced, and you'll have a much higher attention to details, a wonderful and precise swiss movement, and a readonable case size instead of the huge 40 mm.
Let's see... Steinhart produce great alternatives for the Submariner and GMT Master 2. In addition they have vintage style models which would be very difficult to obtain. Long Island watch make a great alternative to the datejust. As for the daytona, I would look at Seiko Speed timer. Another GMT pick is the Baltic Aquascaphe GMT
They were avoiding homages, so no Steinhart, and Islander Brookville might still be too close for comfort. Yes to the Seiko Speedtimer and Aquascaphe GMT, though.
I don’t wear wrist watches, I have two Tissot pocket watches, both mechanical wind.
In my opinion, this is the only way to carry classic time on your body.
An excellent vid! You nailed it!
You were showing spring drive models as you praised the high beat movement when discussing the Grand Seiko alternative to the date just.
Who needs hi-beat when you can have **infinite beat**
The Rolex Datejust is the best designer ever imo. I know a lot of watches but this looks so luxurious and perfect for literally everyone.
There are alot of good Swiss watches out there you may have never heard of mines a Candino Chronograph the motor actually a Tag Huer, its a well-built rectangular watch everything luxury for under 500€ Try the whole Certina group as well as Glycine, Mondaine some less than your average Seiko but not as well known in the US as here in Europe. Breitling watches for a little more are loved even by the critics.
Great video know you should do one on alternatives to expensive clothes
SARB033, Tissot Gentleman, Datejust alternative.
Cadisen, Pagani design, San Martín, Berny, Parnis in my opinion have a good cuality and have Al the cache of the stile.
So beautiful watch
Wouldn't the Air King be entry-level? Still costly but I always thought the Air King was their entry-level timepiece. Absolutely love my Omega Seamaster, found a lightly used 007 Seamaster from Tomorrow Never Dies and will be passed down to my son when I'm gone.
Oyster Perpetual is the "entry level" Rolex.
@@gyang333 the Air King costs less than the Oyster Perpetual which is why I asked the question.
@@michaelwilliams-nq6zg AK retails at $7400. OP41 is $6150. Not sure what price list you're using.
Not wanting to get into the price points of Rolex I have acquired several of the models you used as examples in your video. Over the years I have acquired the Omega Aqua Terra, Tag Heuer Aquaracer, Omega Speedtimer, and most recently the Tudor GMT(Pepsi). Love them all but all are so much less that Rolex. A few of them, I think are equal in quality to Rolex in both design and function. Not sure if I will ever get a Rolex, maybe for retirement, yea, a nice gold Datejust, or not.
Buy a flatiron!! Sheeesh!
I own a $525 Citizen Eco-drive Promaster Diver watch that is virtually identical in appearance to the much overpriced Rolex submariner watch.
Thank you for this Video
I own a simple vintage 6426 black dial.
What's the watch at 10:20?
That is a Nomos Club
The best watch is one in which you have to open up the casing to see who made it!
The funny thing is that I actually think the Omegas are better looking than the Rolex in a lot of these.
Ill take a Seamaster over a Submariner any day!
The OMEGA Seamaster Planet Ocean first issue puts the Sub Rolex to shame.
Watches aren’t that expensive if you compare them to jewelry.
I have two watches than looks almost like a Rolex submariner and a Rolex datejust the submariner alike is gold pleated and the datejust alike is in stainless steel the brand is max time at is like 99 percent cheaper than a Rolex obviusly isnt the same quality and beautiful as a true Rolex but they got the soul of the Rolex watches
Next Time Jlc Reverso /Cartier Tank Alternative
No true alternative to the Reverso, but Seiko has a great alternative to the Tank.
@@waffle911 Indeed! It features in our list, here: www.gentlemansgazette.com/luxury-watch-alternatives/?
I did a shot every time he said iconic. I’m typing this from the hospital
Who knew we could provide entertainment on so many different levels? Cheers! 🥂😂
How about Yacht Master?
I want the date just in gold and silver
Nathan why did you let go of the Aqua Terra? What did you replace it with?
Timex Q gmt is way better than that recommended waterbury
I really want a speedmaster but it's so expensive
What? No Citizen? No Bulova?
Looking through their current catalogs, anything either brand has that could be comparable in style to a Rolex tends to have much larger or more awkward proportions that don't wear as elegantly, and the stuff that is well-proportioned isn't directly comparable.
The Rolex watch is not the best watch in the world, but it is the best watch in the world for signifying business success.
The vast majority of people dont know a rolex from another watch if it werent for a logo/name
Please do a video about Vostok watches ..
I like how, as a young man, my entire wardrobe is worth less than some of these watches.
Fine watches at fine prices. How much of it is tax?
Bold of you to assume Rolex is stylish.
First. I was actually just in the Rolex subreddit when this notification came up.
I've got the tissot gentleman powermatic 80 silicium (in blue), not even remotely close to rolex caliber, but I'm sure it's style will stay priceless for my entire life.
That watch should be been mentioned as an alternative to the DJ instead of the alternative to the OP.
The timex is such a bad alternative to the datejust... owning a watch that is only a bad copy of another one looks cheap, if you can't get the rolex just buy something else but with its own personality, the hamilton, omega and grand seiko are all good choices (even though I prefer swiss watches, so I don't think I'd pick the grand seiko) and there are lots of other good swiss houses (my favourite is longines since it as a good quality and an accessible price). Also as a lover of vintage watches I prefer buying old swiss watches at a fraction of their price and then get them serviced, the older designs go perfectly well with classic menswear outfits and you'll have at your wrist something different from everyone else.
you need to get the liner for that coat.
! CITIZEN !
Rolex is the KING, heritage, and is an actual watch that does why it’s supposed to. With that said I agree with alternatives, but I do not like the copycat theory. Might as well save for what you really want.
I enjoy wearing my Orient Automatic Submarina style watch. Case, face and bracelet all in black. Around $200
Agree on Orient. I have a Submariner that I love, but the my Orient Kamasu is also a great watch. I have a handful of different straps that make it fun and stylish.
Right now probably the only Rolex that I'd buy might be the Rolex Submariner.....although that also has competition. Rolex is losing its "dope factor" or "cool factor" to me. It used to be a professional's watch. Now it tries to be aa rich man's watch but it will never get close to the "Holy Trinity" or Audemars Piquet, Patek Philippe or Vacheron Constantin.
Nothing wrong with a "Swiss Made" homage.
Correct me if I’m wrong here but a DateJust is a Rolex, not an alternative to? 🤔
There seems to be a misunderstanding. They were introducing alternatives *to* the Datejust. They introduce the Rolex model first, then the alternatives.
When you buy a Rolex or any other high end timepiece , you’re not ‘burning money’. Bad analogy
I'm personally very fond of a lot of low end Chinese watch brands, yes they are on the homage side, not copies or knockoffs, but at the same time Rolex doesn't own the rights these watch sizes and shapes.
I'm actually thinking about buying a Pegani GMT watch rn
Got any watches for 20 quid?
Not to be negative, but the premise of this video is somewhat useless. People aren't buying a Rolex because they're stylish; they buy them because of the brand and status symbol.
If you want a Rolex, you're better off skipping these alternatives and just saving up for an actual (gently used) Rolex.
TL;DR There are no alternatives to status symbols.
Fed is always class! Nice video gentleman. I have been lucky enough to have owned a 2015 sub and a datejust from 1988. Both no longer with me as the money was needed for house. My Seiko will do just fine until I can move back into the luxury tier.
1.
Great video, though unfortunate reference to Nico.
Forget the watches - those boots are gorgeous! :)
Omega Seamaster 300 '21 in stainless steel. Gets me hyped up every time I wear it!
For wearing a rolex you need to have the worth of wearing it.
Or it would look like a crow carrying some swarn's feathers and imitating it.
Yes. If you want to wear a Rolex, you need to commit to the image. Wear tailored clothing, drive a nice car, live in a nice house, etc. People will see through you very quickly if you're "watch poor".
Daytona and seamaster? Lol. You mean speedmaster...
Dude! The EXPLORER!!! The only Rolex I could be interested in. Why did you skip it?
Addendum RUclips short please!
I had a shot at buying an Explorer at a boutique a few years ago but somehow it didn’t sing to me when I tried it on wrist.
@@eyeheartsushi2212 that's why it's crucial to try on-wrist. The chemistry can't be decided from behind a two-dimensional screen.
@@benmoore7946 Exactly
Explorer is really affordable, it doesn't really needs a budget alternative.
@@jesusmgw I know that "affordable" and "espensive" are relative, but dang! calling a Rolex Explorer affordable is either out of touch or I'm really poorer than I thought!
Except SOME Omegas, everything else is money wasted. Just save for that Rolex.
A watch is a tool not an investment
As a gentleman’s style channel I’d expect that you iron your pants. The bottom was a wrinkle fest……
Rolex marketing is terrible. As is Apple’s. They rely on their reputation to sell.
What are you on about??? Hahaha. How do you think they got that reputation….marketing DuH!
Surely being able to sell your products without even trying due to your reputation constitutes incredible marketing? The products and reputation market themselves
Utter nonsense. Apple was killing it in marketing until the iPod after Jobs took back over.
The company's *reputation* was built entirely on marketing stunts and half-truths masquerading as innovation, and are the largest watchmaker by volume in Switzerland despite pricing and availability-because the demand for Rolex above all others is just that ludicrously high. They are possibly the finest example of successful marketing on the planet, and Apple is right up there with them.
Reputation is marketing. Marketing is reputation. They go hand-in-hand.
Ive been wearing Rolex Date just since 1969. I gave my first one to my son and traded my Patek Philippe for my second one.
Swatch !
💎
My * "expensive" / collectable watch is my Luminox 3500. I bought it new, @ 1/2 price, as a "shelf model." That said, I've been a Seiko fan most of my life. but actually favor Timex.
Rolex is an overrated brand, they are made for people that has money and knows nothing about watches. there are far better (in so many ways) options out there.
I think you should include one between the 2nd & 3rd price ranges (~$1000 to $3000)
It's an awkward price range where not a lot of direct Rolex alternatives end up. Loads of other unique and interesting stuff, though, and much of it is German.
Just say NO to the Texas Timex. The watch never makes the man especially an overpriced Rolex.
The fact that Raphael Schneider would not own a Rolex causes me to seriously doubt is sense of style for gentlemen.
Here are the reasons behind that decision: www.gentlemansgazette.com/7-reasons-id-never-buy-a-rolex/?
If you want cheap Rolex you can get speed King for under 2k