Lucy Letby: ‘high probability she’s innocent’ | Sir David Davis
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- “This was not a murder… this was suboptimal medical care.”
The case of death for the babies involved in this case was medical care not “an intervention” by a nurse as the prosecution argued, says Tory MP Sir David Davis.
Join this channel to get access to perks -
/ @listentotimesradio
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.c...
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.c...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.c...
This is a high profile case. There must be many low profile cases where this innocent are in jail
I agree..but creepy pervy middle aged unattractive men are not interested in those
true Starmer said that people in jail are making money in this country so this is why so many people went to jail and the laws are harder every single day
There's 4 nurses in prison for similar circumstances
Absolutely. The system is a farce
That’s always true.
Far more likely to be let out of death row, due to later discoveries, than life sentences.
Thank you, Sir David. I've had a lot of abuse online for questioning the strength of this conviction.
Don't let the trolls and haters get to you. Most of them are saddoes sitting in their lonely bedsits with nothing better to do.
There are alot of people who feel the same .there are idiots all over the world
@@joekavanagh7171 umm, no. We're thinking about the prospect of seven babies's deaths going unavenged. Do you think the prosecution has any case at all?
@@joekavanagh7171They could also be in flats , houses and caravans
No mention of the fact that David Davis has consistently voted for funding cuts to the NHS and was at the forefront of the Brexit campaign which directly lead to us having less experienced staff in hospitals? Seems relevant.
Google the case of Australian mother Kathleen Folbigg. She had 4 babies/toddlers die from cot death. The prosecution made much of statistics and the diary notes that she had been encouraged to record to help her cope with her grief. The prosecution Cherry picked the sentences and phrases that best suited their case. She spent 20 years in jail and was released last year . Scientists found a rogue gene in her bloodline that gave her children a predisposition to cot death . She hadn't killed any of them . At no point had she ever confessed and would likely have never been released.
Being jailed in such circumstances must be akin to being buried alive . Think about that for a minute.
"that's not how the system works"
With all due respect to Danny Shaw, it is becoming abundantly clear that the system does not in fact, work.
Do a job caring for others who may sadly pass away despite your best efforts and this is what you get.
IKR? Another 'stickler for the rules', even when it is clear that there has been a miscarriage of justice from the get go!
They tried to pull a Lucia de Berk on her.
Yes, Mr Shaw is not the sharpest pencil in the box - perhaps he's just covering for a horrible system
If she is innocent can you imagine what she’s been through, how she feels? To have been a good person whose life has been torn apart by those who needed a person to blame? Imagine how the parents feel to have thought their kids were murdered now have to be made to believe that wasn’t the case? Law suits will be everywhere 😮
She has her religion to get her through it. I don't know if I would have made it.
It's unimaginable. Being falsely accused, let alone convicted, of a heinous crime like this is some of the worst psychic trauma a human being can endure -- re: gaslighting and persecution
Agree 100%. That’s why I didn’t jump on the bandwagon being horrible online like some were. No one actually saw her do it so no actual concrete evidence!
I have been working for the NHS for 30 years and it would 100% throw someone to the wolves to protect it's image.
Yes and nhs needs to pay for it. My friend suffered sexual harassment at work and NHS made her leave as she filed an official complaint. They paid her 1 years salary to not take it further. Its disgusting, really
No mention of the fact that David Davis has consistently voted for funding cuts to the NHS and was at the forefront of the Brexit campaign which directly lead to us having less experienced staff in hospitals? Seems relevant.
As a union convenor in the public sector for many years this is a classic case of a "patsy" being found by the Management and then blamed for THEIR incompetence... That looks like what happened here.
Just a few points from Private Eye's excellent coverage of the Letby case.
1 The case against her hinges on the reliability of Dr Evans,who volunteered himself as the expert witness.
2 The trial judge was warned against his reliability by another judge,who'd presided over a court case with Dr Evans as a witness.
3 The doctors who produced todays report are far better qualified than Dr Evans.
Dr Phil Hammond's coverage in Private Eye brings to mind their reporting of the Post Office scandal.
You can't expert shop.
@@leesaunders8407 He volunteered himself, i hear.
@ No, he was chosen in the appeal.
Thanks. To say the doctors who produced the report are far better the Evans is a huge understatement. Those doctors who examined all cases are t op expert neonatologists while Evans is a paediatrician. His theory that injecting air into the nasogastric tube is beyond ridiculous and shows his poor understanding of the pathophysiology of premature babies.
@@snghanim I believe I'm right in saying that Dr Shoo Lee has published some 500 peer-reviewed papers, and that the others who examined the cases are similarly well published. I'm pretty sure I heard him say that Evans hasn't published a single one. Which hardly makes him an expert at anything much.
If Lucy Letby is exonerated, all credit to David Davis for giving this matter his attention.
I think you will find it will be thanks to multiple experts and reports of interested high profile people. And David Davis
@@bobbielang5685 he seems a god man.
He leaked secrets and let a civil servant take the blame and get sacked for it. He’s pro death penalty, anti abortion and anti lgbt rights
she looks evil. The animal should be under the jail.
@NapWinter youre funnay😊❤x
😊
Doctors covering up for their own incompetence maybe 🤔
Think of how evil you must be knowing you put an innocent person away for a whole life order, we only get one go at this life, nothing can get that time back, absolutely nothing
That Hospital Management must be sleeping well.
The NHS has thrown her to the wolves, and the most frightening part is, it doesn’t surprise me in the slightest!
You do get thrown to the wolves and nobody will help you.Happened to a family member.
The NHS cares as much about her as it does about our health.
I've unfortunately seen how brutal NHS can get just 2 protect any wrong doings. Threw me 2 the wolves. Ive never been the same again. Caused severe PTSD.
@lamiyaasgur1503 really? Sorry to hear that. Can you elaborate on your story?
@@omabdulganiwould, not can.
This prosecution is unsafe
Perfectly put. I have no idea if she is innocent or guilty but the court case was a total disaster for multiple reasons.
David Davis is a brave politician. Raising questions about a conviction is a very lonely place to be.
As an American, it's incredibly hard to imagine a member of our "conservative party" ever giving half a fu€£ about a wrongful conviction
Especially for a Tory. Tories are not renowned for their compassion.
She tortured babies to death.
No mention of the fact that David Davis has consistently voted for funding cuts to the NHS and was at the forefront of the Brexit campaign which directly lead to us having less experienced staff in hospitals? Seems relevant.
The system is corrupt who'd have thought.
The whole system is messed up.
corruption
And this is why I am glad that we don’t have the death sentence
17th century witch trail
Made a scapegoat for a failed hospital maternity department.
The real question to be asked is why was she charged at all. Dewi Evans putting himself forward as an expert witness while not holding the qualification to do so. Police and CPS not checking this out. Investigation directed by doctors who should have been viewed as suspects or negligent . Examine Dewi Evans track record as an expert. Bonnie Lewis, Justice Jackson and others. Thirlwall should have been a proper inquiry.
She wrote that she done it on a piece of paper 😂 how are poeple forgetting that.
@@rosskerr4860 I wrote that the moon is made of cheese the other week, people need to remember that, because it is made of cheese because I wrote it down on a piece of paper
@Greedy-y3r Spot on
Why does a transcript of this trial cost £100,000-00p ? This actually is a hinderance to the ordinary person to get a fair trial, and therefore justice?
We are in Birmingham Six territory. The Court of Appeal dragged their feet way past the time they should have released the six.
The Court of Appeal are a concern even in normal cases.
The Birmingham six were all IRA members caught on the mainland - they should have been in prison anyway!!
And the Guildford 4.
@ the Birmingham six were all IRA members attending a funeral for an IRA msn who blew himself up planting a bomb in a Coventry post office. Releasing them was the miscarriage of justice
Get that girl out of jail asap disgusting behaviour by the police and the cps
And back to the baby ward. My advice to her in the future would be, stop writing creepy post-it notes and stalking bereaved patients on FB. That doesn't help
guilty as sin, but hope they release her so the parents can meet her
Conspiracy nutcase
@@spudspuddywith all the new information it looks like she definitely wasn't guilty this whole case stunk from the very beginning. When she does get released and takes them on she will be paid thousands possibly millions she will have a new name new life and for sure no one will get to her 😂
If she was a man you'll be screaming for the death penalty
This is not a personal issue. It’s not about having an opinion. It’s not about taking a side. It’s about a very simple thing. Is the doubt over this conviction ? because if there is doubt it needs to be investigated.
Exactly. Convictions should occur only with PROOF beyond reasonable doubt. Now there is a reasonable doubt, so she should not be deemed guilty.
Dewi Evans came up with air embolism as cause of death because he couldn't think of anything else! He's a long retired paediatrician, not even a neonatologist. He's a hired gun for the consultants and the police.
Her defence team seemed inept at best.
Mr David Davis respect to you sir thank you for helping Lucy.
No mention of the fact that David Davis has consistently voted for funding cuts to the NHS and was at the forefront of the Brexit campaign which directly lead to us having less experienced staff in hospitals? Seems relevant.
If I was younger I’d emigrate from UK. If innocent a massive stain on NHS and our criminal justice system. Shame!!!
How's it the fault of the NHS that they've have had over a decade of budget cuts that David Davis voted for, and lost many experienced members of staff due to Brexit - which David Davis led the campaign for?
It's absolutely frightening that someone could be convicted of such serious crimes when there is such doubt about the evidence that was proffered for conviction.
Surely if there is this much doubt about the evidence then she should be released from prison and held somewhere safer until re-trial. I'm sure her life would be in danger given the nature of the accusations and her current proximity to people with an axe to grind.
I totally agree with you Barry. She MUST be released immediately. I am sure if she is found innocent after a few trial she will write a book and become rich. I wish Lucy all the best.
Incompetent managers, doctors,throwing a nurse to the wolfs.
This is post office level bad here.
💯 And each postmaster/mistress were told ( you're the only) 😮.
A new trial must be ordered and she must be released on parole until that trial.
The conviction has to be Unsafe and therefore must be reversed and compensation paid.
Dont forget the dead babies parents in all this. The hospital has some serious questions to answer.
The Lucy Letby case is a fine example of the depths the establishment will sink to in order to protect their own @rse.
Shocking that an article questioning this case was banned..... that in itself is a miscarriage !
I think there’s a great chance she will be released.
Yaaaasssss😊😊
Nope
@@Swansong321 yep. The momentum is unstoppable now. There are too many people unconvinced of her guilt. It's just a matter of time.
@@Swansong321 hate to disappoint you but there won't even be a retrial she will be out sooner than what people think innocent people don't belong in jail .
Free her
you should offer to let her come live in your house
@NapWinter free on bail , she has loving parents and a home to go to .
@ Unlike her victims ?
I guess you haven't kept up with developments, right? Haven't you seen they're now arguing she might actually be innocent? @NapWinter
@@Tube2097he did, but he won't let facts stand in his way. He prefers that she was a killer
If "Justice" cannot trump "process" then there is something seriously wrong with our Judicial system.
Exactly. They are not interested in the truth, only in perpetuating a process.
When you dig into the detail it’s shocking. This is going to be historic. The whole judicial system needs an immediate overhaul.
Absolute nonsense if you really have dug into the detail, how do you explain her absolute lack of empathy or emotion? Lack of crying only when the doctor she liked was named in court?
@@leesaunders8407 evidence?
@leesaunders8407 shut up will u...if she's innocent then she's innocent. All people are different..just because u perceive no emotion or empathy DOESN'T mean she's not feeling it inside. And this is the problem with life..not many are clued up to realise they don't know how someone else is feeling despite outward appearance and quick to judge
@@James007SAVS Then explain why when she was on holiday for 2 weeks the collapses and deaths stopped? They also stopped when she was arrested.
@ of?
Judiciary do not like to admit that they erred. Expect considerable stalling tactics to protect their reputations for as long as possible.
It took 10 or more years in other similar cases.
NHS cover up. Routine.
I had defended the conviction when there was initial questioning of the statistical evidence. I thought the medical and circumstantial evidence were more important and that the legal team were just trying to find weaknesses. After listening to the press conference today, I am stunned. This is a massive legal and medical scandal.
Admitting that you can be wrong about something when you encounter new evidence is the mark of an evolved human being, so you can pat yourself on the back.
@@RTAC_1234 Not really. He's just going with the current authority. I don't see anything particularly honourable in a sheep. He would garner more respect if he stuck to his original opinion.
@stephen but you never asked cui bono.
That was the first question I asked back in 2023 when I first heard of this case and it was immediately apparent she was innocent.
Let's get her appeal and retrial and see what the jury believes. Innocent or guilty.
The jury is a bunch of dummies. The feel the same as you reading a rocket science book When you are poor you get this treatment.
I've always said that the medical issues involved are so detailed and specialised that a panel of Doctors from around the world should have been a ' jury ' and 3 or more judges should have tried the case .
@@KeithFoad this will go straight to the appeal she won't be having a retrial she will be out sooner than what people think and rightly so.
This case had lots of gaps from the onset. Im not surprise of the new evidence. What a shame😢 miscarriage of justice
I thought she was innocent from the very start. Feel sorry for the parents who lost their babies but this poor girl should be released asap. One of the biggest miscarriages of justice in recent years.
Fran - you are right. Like you I did not think she was guilty.
@paulripley2178 👍🙏
The panel are the best of the best in the world theirs no one more qualified than these people surely that’s saying something when they say these babies wasn’t murdered.. I pray this is a miscarriage of justice and she sues the shxt out of the hospital that’s put her in jail and the doctors struck off for incompetence.. and the managers sacked for threatening nurses if they came forward with evidence
All forensic evidence is circumstantial. The argument for exonerating Letby is circumstantial, too.
My own experience in a neonatal unit was as a parent, where there was 2 ward rounds a day by consultant (not junior doctors), one even found my baby had a perforated stomach or something, can't remember. But in the place Lucy Letby worked it was 2 ward rounds a week, so that is basically appalling care, my son did die after 7 weeks, but in the place Lucy worked I doubt he would have made it a week.
When I saw the news initially I assumed she was guilty as the media portrayed that, but then when I saw more into the actual details, then I realised she was a scapegoat, she complained and got shafted. The parents of the children who died shouldn't be persuaded by the Expert witness, Dr Evans, as when you look into his past you realise this guy is a self righteous psychopath.
Just listening to the report by Dr Lee's panel, and it's fair to say the Doctors at Countess of Chester Hospital don't come out of it well, unless he's lying of course, which I'm damned sure he isn't.
Why ? He’s never examined any of those babies or worked at CoC but has opinions on everything
@@RockHunter-v7j neither did the prosecution witness, he managed to quote this experts published work in a way that was 100% false. He basically worked backwards and came up with a hypothetical method, which has been in front of the world picked apart by the leaders in this field of medicine.
@@RockHunter-v7j The 'panel', who are clinical experts and have examined 1000's of babies and written 1000's of reports and scientific papers (in contrast to Dr Dewi Evans the prosecution 'expert' witness who retired on 2009, having written NONE) have offered expert opinion only on the fully documented cases and test results provided by the prosecution. So, you're either a relative of one of the incompetent doctors or nurses at the CCH or you haven't actually listened to the report, or you are a common or garden thicko. I'm going with thicko.
@ the “panel” weren’t named so how do you know who or what they are ? The cult line has been 60 top neonatologists, then it was 40, now it’s 14. What are their views on detaching breathing tubes, changing medical records, stealing paperwork, stalking dead babies parents online, putting dead babies initials on her diary on the days she killed them, sorry, they died of natural causes, her photographic memory of good actions she did but almost total amnesia about the bad stuff
They were so dead set on prosecuting her and making her out to be the worst possible human being they could. She's simply a scapegoat for the state of the NHS.
Not true at all, in fact it took quite a bit of effort for them to acknowledge what she was doing.
The scapegoat narrative is completely fake.
It never made any sense. Absolutely nothing in her background to indicate she isn't a through and through good person.
@@ScottishAtheistmy mate is a gp, his wife is a gp. A midwife nearly killed her and her baby when she was in labour. He wrote a letter asking what happened. Their response was don’t worry, we’ve sacked the midwife. The midwife was only 2 years qualified and she had 3 times as many patients than she should have done that night. She was technically at fault, but the root cause of the incident is not as clear cut. The trust wouldn’t respond to his requests on clarifying these points. They took the easy and cheapest way out. This stuff happens daily.
@@Withnail1969what is there to indicate that she is a good person? I'm a nurse, and trust me the profession is renowned for being full of bully's and total cluster b personalities.... psychopaths, narcs, histrionics, borderlines. Then mix in the doctors that are always getting stuff wrong and trying to pin it on us.
Thank you,for everything you have been doing ,Sir David . I hope that Lucy is free very soon.🙏.
Really?
Yeah because Tory MPs love children 🙄
@@Toecutter875YES REALLY
@@harrye232is this some kind of joke?
@@Toecutter875 she's innocent
this is scandalous if she is innocent.
Why were no psychologists called to give evidence about an innocent person's state of mind when wrongly accused ?
There is of course the slight problem of the confessional notes including: "I killed them" and "I am evil" - and the collecting of paperwork relating to the dead babies and families.
The case against her went notably beyond merely medical matters.
She was told to right her thoughts and feelings down, she also wrote things that were said to her. She wrote what she was accused of, what others thought of her and her thoughts about what were said.
Many if not most of us have handover notes at home. Usually by accident, sometimes to keep record of a patient you will still have care of the next day so that continuity is aided.
I know that many do look families up on social media sometimes. We care about these families, we care for them and it affects us because we're human. Nothing unusual about any of it.
@@NikkiOwen
You need to ask yourself this.
In what circumstances could you ever imagine yourself writing down ‘I killed them’ and ‘I am evil.’
Just think about that.
I can tell you now, no therapist in the world could get me to write that out. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
It is a confession.
She had a complete mental breakdown, as would you in that position.
@@pippipster6767you have no understanding and ability to empathise, therefore you shouldn't be entitled to an opinion. I've a decade dealing with life and death, questioning decisions made in extremis, and dealing with negligent NHS Trusts. Her actions and notes are totally plausible.
@@mattvnewson
Huge desperation to get her off the hook.
I’m not persuaded at all.
Justice for Lucy. She must be freed immediately! The incompetence of the NHS and the Prosecutors win at all cost attitude has led to this clearly innocent Woman's conviction. People need to be in prison over this and it's not Lucy. Free her immediately!
And a jury has never got it wrong
Who would have thought that a Tory would be the person to highlight a miscarriage of justice?
Witch hunt from the beginning.
I think she is guilty, but is entitled to have it looked at.
Is Mr Danny Shaw obtuse or intentionally glossing over the importance of the medical experts? It looks like The Times is back to its role of covering for a system that is not fit for purpose.
Evens the so called proicution expert is a Nefarious, Narcissistic, he has an unreasonable high sense of his own importance. the world is saying his evidance was twisted , brainless and worthless. He is bias like no other . He should be the one locked up in prison for the rest of his life.
Disgraceful that article was banned here.
It was very clear to me listening to the original recordings of the doctors and hospital managers on interviews they were engaged in a cover up. Lots of magical handshakes involved to cover their tracks.
Nhs cover ups and a nurse taking the flak ? hmm sounds familiar . neglect ....
Not gonna happen. They dont admit theyre wrong even when they are.
Even if she is proven not guilty and released, the judicial system has ruined her life already.
It would seem that if the ‘ experts ‘ cannot agree then there must be some ‘ reasonable doubt ‘ if that is the case she ought to have been found ‘ not guilty ‘ sort this out , get her bailed out if this is gonna take years .
“Letsby” having her out of prison!
lol I dont understand this
😂 Was waiting for something like this
@
Letsby 😂😂😂😂 very funny
@ what does it mean?
Sympathies to the parents - this poor woman has had her life ruined, no career, job, income, friends, partner or children.
In or out of prison, her future life is bleak.
I think it deserves an appeal, that is not the same as saying she is innocent but if major thing were wrong with the trial, it should really be eligable for appeal. The first guy got something wrong, you don't have automatic appeal in England and Wales, that is the point you have to apply to appeal. Automatic means it happens without review.
Jezzz, all those highly paid Barristers and Judges plus court staff and experts and we got this distorted mess with no satisfactory result.
But isn't only showing a sentence on HALF a note "misleading the jury"?? All the evidence shown by the Prosecution was bias because that's their job, they don't ave to show anything that shows her to be innocent. So how do you define "misleading".
And what was the Defence doing when they discussed that note, did they make a point of shown the rest of it? I don't get how there is still so much uncertainty.
Defence did a bad job, they had other witnesses and didn't call them. So much is wrong here. Maybe the prosecution doesn't have to care but the defence should. And prosecution have to at least be accurate with the evidence .
I’ve seen first hand the depths of deceit and lies that Nhs will go to to protect a high up rather than admit something is wrong . Is just like Paula Vennels. And post office. They know
It's got nothing to do with probabilities.
Retrial is in the public interest, given the loss of confidence.
How can you have a retrial when according to new evidence babies weren't even murdered but instead indicates they died from illness, coupled with, delayed treatment and poor care. What crime has been comitted if that is the case?
@SN-ig2ml because as you said it's evidence. You can't undo a conviction without going back to court.
The original expert was in fact not an expert at all.
They need to hit pause on the Thirlwall farce. A massive waste of time and money.
I do not know if she is guilty or innocent
But her behaviour was bizarre for a registered nurse/midwife with the NMC
Was it? How? IMO everything is easily explainable... The diary scribbles amount to a false confession, which are incredibly common. Looking up the grieving parents on social media isn't weird at all and I'm shocked anyone thinks it is...
So what? Strange (debatably) behaviour is NOT a crime, much less a crime worthy of a lifetime of jail and infamous status in history. If we don't know with absolute PROOF then she needs to be released
@@JackAShepherd ,Taking confidential information home
Social media of bereaved parents
@ Delusional. I hope you never get a life sentence based on subjectively- and marginally-odd behavior
@JackAShepherd I was not in court so u do not no if she is guilty or not guilty
But her behavior goes against the resposibity and accountability of the N M C
I highly doubt they'll give a retrial until the so called medical professionals involved in the case or the hospital have either died, moved on or are no longer in the medical profession.
It took over a decade in other similar cases
This has momentum now. They'll have to do something.
It's funny how people's opinion quickly change in a heartbeat and think she's innocent all of a sudden and we haven't even got the whole truth yet.. the power of social media is crazy
The prosecution which deliberately gave selective "evidence" should be jailed for perverting the course of justice.
That is an absurd idea, the whole point of prosecution is to show evidence demonstrating guilt, not to play devils advocate or a defence...
I have a PhD in thermofluids so I have some experience in the analysis of complex data. Explaining such analysis in the context of an adversarial court is very challenging, even with the best of intentions. This is a fundamental weakness in the Anglophone legal system and would be so, even if lawyers as a class were deeply numerate, which is not generally obvious. I believe an examining magistrate, on the lines of the French system, to verify the analysis that might lead to a conviction, would be better. If a special magistrate with sufficient technical knowledge (so probably not a lawyer) had reviewed this case, it seems unlikely it would have gone to trial.
Yesterday a pediatrician, today a pathologist and tomorrow, Dr. Evans will fancy himself as a chimneysweep.
She is guilty.
She is innocent.
D. Davis is a tory MP. What expertise does he have? He just has a platform for opinion.
Hold the bandwagon and lets see whats proven. Lets not forget the real victims here... . Baddies can be female.
He is a trained scientist and mathematician.
Davis is he Brexi turd. I wouldn' trust him with anything.
@@inbb510No he's not.
Bsc Honours Molecular Science and Computer Science Warwick University 1971
@@edwardbartle277 A vaguely related degree from 54 years ago does not make him a trained scientist and mathematician. And I doubt that he would claim anything of the sort himself.
With one baby, she removed the breathing tube and turned off the heart monitors, but it was the blocked sink that did it, honestly the IQ rate in the country is dropping fast
Yes what about when she removed the tubes to take a photo of one baby?
“High probability” that’s an example of stone cold innumerate British math.
Judges lie?
*cough* post office *cough*
theres such thing as politically motivated rulings.
If she is found to be innocent then the people who are should all be given the same sentence as she was handed.
Didn't she admit to the evil crimes in her diary
then there would be evidence of guilt and none of this would be happening.
Well...let me see....would I let her nurse my baby knowing what other staff members said they saw and given she looked up bereaved families on social media?....Nah...
David Davies and all his big important sounding friends!?! Let her out then, reinstate her and flood the papers with sorry Lucy we all thought you killed babies, like what your note said…
What about her self confessions in that diary....
These so called confessions were not written in a diary, they were written on note paper and post it stamps, after she had been arrested and questioned over the deaths. She was advised by councillors to write down her feelings as a method of coping with the severe stress. If these confessions were taken literally, then why wasn't the same principle applied when she also expressed her innocence and feelings of persecution in these notes
The question mark on your header is an insult to our intelligence after watching the press conference - no need to question her innocence just question why she was made a scapegoat for he incompetence of the doctors in the birthing unit.
She wrote it down thst she did it. How do you explain that?
@@rosskerr4860 Much like Letby at trial, they can't explain any of her bizarre behaviour, from keeping medical notes as trophies, searching for the parents of dead babies online, etc.
Letby is a pathological narcissist, so she can't ever admit fault. You'll have noticed this in the trial when she describes events in such a way that avoids blame. The confidential medical notes for babies "have come home with her" instead of "I took them home with me and kept them. I shouldn't have done that, it was wrong and I apologise."
She literally cannot see herself as less than perfect, hence why they didn't use incompetence as a defence despite clear evidence of mistreatment of babies on her part. Just ONE example of dozens of incidents out of what was possibly hundreds (given Letby appears to have kept hospital medical notes as trophies after attacks): there are phone records showing she was texting a friend whilst - according to her own entries on the medical notes system - she was supposed to be feeding a baby, who then shortly afterwards presented with vomiting and a distended stomach: this is more than likely due to Letby becoming bored and frustrated so she force-fed the child to the point they were sick. That alone is child abuse.
@@rosskerr4860 show me any evidence that she wrote that she did it ... she wrote down her thoughts as the psychologist advised her. Never in any evidence has she been shown to have written that she did it - get the full facts before you make statements like that.
@ he says it in the video she writes it but on the same piece of paper says i’m innocent why is this happening, obviously after her consequences have caught up with her. Why is this even being given the time of day she definitely done it
@@rosskerr4860 if you had taken the time to listen to the evidence from the numerous experts in neonatal care from around the world, that was given in the press conference, you may actually understand the evidence is not there - try watching it all and then come back with your opinion when it is an informed opinion.
Consultants and Nurses who pointed the finger at lucy had better get they're Solicitors ready, because it's not looking good for them.
Their
Two years? That’s disgraceful 😡
I think there is someone powerful who likes and has been looking for someone like lucy letby and wants her free while also testing their power
If she was innocent then why didn't she seem shocked when arrested and what about the things she'd written in her diary? Plus why was she always on duty during the baby's deaths?
Because they had already questioned her several times and she felt they were going to arrest her. As for being present during the babies' deaths, who killed all the babies who died when she wasn't there?
she is 100% guilty.
She was thrown under the bus by the hierarchy of the hospital, it's a disgrace
interviewer with the moustache didn't challenge David Davis ..the prosecution made its case..but she had a defence team to challenge that at trial!🙄unbelievable
What a terrible miscarriage of judgement if she is. The hysteria around her always put me off. If she is innocent press and legal system should really question and amend their ways.
The question is has the random death of babies discontinued upon her being locked up? Let's not forget these babies died under her watch right?
And many others too. Not just her.
No. The level of care the unit was allowed to provide was downgraded as soon as Lucy was accused. This means that the most poorly babies were no longer admitted there, so the death statistics went down. This unit should not have been looking after such sick babies in the first place, it was inadequate for that level of care. Many of the babies were not even under her care when they died. So no, not on her watch.