We are most grateful for all the support and prayers for the research! Thank you for considering joining our monthly members web site so that we can continue the Noah's ark work this year!
Steve Haukdahl nothing really in-depth has been done outside of the boat formation to compare. Only a few small scans but not good enough for a comparison study. The resistivity scans in 2014 did go outside of the boat.
@@Btw_visit_____todacarne-com Yea the Turkish archaeologists who would be doing this would do it in a professional manner and are professionals themselves and would do their best to minimize damage yet maximize our understanding of what is below ground and determine what we are seeing in the geophysical surveys.
Why is this the first time I’m hearing about this?! Why was this not the find of our entire history?! I mean, I’ve always been a believer but it sure is nice to finally have these stories confirmed. It renews my faith. God bless those who refused to give up on this site.
This was discovered, confirmed and broadcast back in the 80's by American and Turkish archeologists, physicist, etc. 20/20 did a special on it as well. Maybe you were not born then, but this is not new!
You answered your own question. You are a believer living in a satanic world that hates the truth.they don’t want more evidence to support our faith in the holy scriptures.
Check my playlists. If this impresses you, wait until you see the DNA evidence for Christ. And there is stuff on the archaeology of Sodom & Gammorrah, also real. Archaeology of Israel and data on the Red Sea findings where Israel crossed over. Not to mention a ton of mathematics that show that the underlying accuracy and transmission of the Bible is intact.
Because it's BS .there were 8 people on the ark to feed and care for over 2 million creature's if they didn't sleep or rest they spent approx 43 seconds caring for each creature by the time they fed the last creature ,the first one they fed would have been dead from starvation . Stop accepting the bible as gospel ( no pun intended) do some real scientific research. It's a good story but that's all it is a story,myth fable. Sorry to piss on your parade
Approximately halfway through the video there is a radar imaging of the buried ship. It seem to show evenly spaced ribs of a ship. Almost like the buried remains of a Viking ship during excavations. I would be happy to get an answer whether the radar does show the ribs or partial framework of this buried vessel. Many thanks, and keep up the good work.
Possibly or the walls or partitions to rooms. The radar is definitely showing angular structure at different depths below the ground. If this was a natural object of mud and rock you wouldn't expect to find such right angles and straight lines.
@@DiscoveredMedia thank you for the answer, it was very helpful. This is definitely a buried ship of gigantic proportions high up in mountainous terrain. There is no other explanation. God seem to have a way of confounding the skeptics.
@@DiscoveredMedia Not to throw water on your ideas. If you're talking in general terms, clear angles and straight lines normally not possible under typical deformation and stress. The most boxy types of rocks are Basalt and this picture below has some near right angles. live.staticflickr .com/3138/3076603417_89bae5f5e0_b.jpg
SO if this is/was Noah's ark....what is the large (although broken), wooden structure with multiple levels buried in rock/glacier 12,000-13,000 feet up Mt. Ararat?
Could it be possible that there were two arks tethered together because a Chinese exploration team have found an ark on mount Ararat and they have filmed and photographs of its internal cavities?
Brother If you are not around mount ararat the which mountain is it? Please reply. I want to know the exact name of the mountain and the place where you were besides the ark.. Brother are you standing on Mount judi?
It's 15-20 miles south of Mount Ararat goo.gl/maps/ggZJdunaa4V7rwdR9 it's in the "mountains of Ararat" as the Bible says. Local villagers do call the area there "Judi/Cudi" so the name given in the Quran matches as well.
@@carvinlambert6899 no that’s not true. He tried many times to excavate it and get funding and even once was promised a permit but was taken hostage by terrorists a few days later. You need to read up on the history of his work at the site and watch videos of his meetings. He wanted many times to do some form of excavation to ultimately prove what’s there.
@@DiscoveredMedia Hello, I appreciate the work you're doing. I want to know if a Chinese group of excavators found the Ark and was able to examine certain parts of it. Thank you
The Ark of the Covenant is a rectangle box but the Hebrew word "Ark" here is not the same Hebrew word "Ark" used for Noah's Ark. The Hebrew word "Ark" for Noah's Ark is the same Hebrew word "Ark" word which is used for the "Box" (a rectangle box to float, with no navigation) Moses was placed in in the Nile, as a baby. And, the retangle box allowed for maximum cargo capacity, which is greatly reduced by modern day boat shape/design.
As is pointed out here by the Christian ministry that runs Ark Encounters who made this display the book of Genesis does not say the ark was a rectangular box. ruclips.net/user/postUgxTRsCOBIPUMZ4uRpR4AaABCQ
Would like some detail on how the door was built into the side of the ark, and the timbers found showing little to no evidence of growth rings in the wood. This would help clarify the mystery for some, that we did not have 4 seasons before the flood, only after the flood for they are 1st mentioned at the covenant of the rainbow. The first 12 chapters of the book of Genesis are written with information presented sequentially and spacially. More info on titanium rivets and aluminum metal found there would be awsome too. Don't know if such scanners can look at the cross grain laminated construction but if such could be done, wow, could help others to realize that the bible is true.
I'm not familiar with the written account. If there was a powerful world wide flood, would Noah's family needed the materials from the Ark at that time when the waters receded? Would they not have disassembled it? Just a question.
He possibly used some of it though not all. We have many historical ancient records of people visiting the ark up through the time of Christ so we know the ship remains were still there 1000s of years later after the flood and not destroyed.
@@DiscoveredMedia don't the historical accounts say they had to climb mt ararat? I wouldn't dismiss the structures on the mountain so quickly. Do you have any ide how hard it would be to find 5000 year old wood, carry it thousands of feet up a mountain, build it then cover it with ice and rock? You say it was proven to be a hoax. I've read that your site has been proven to be an odd shaped rock formation. Not saying it is. Just saying that because someone dismisses something as fake doesn't necessarily make it so
@@nobodyspecial6513 yea good point on not being quick to dismiss a site based on what others say. But based on talking to locals in that area of what they did to put the wood on the hot summer days up there over a few years and then taking the Chinese to the site after they had frozen in place during the winter and knowing that Ararat is a stratovolcano and knowing it was built on a plain laid down by the flood per geology I would find it highly unlikely that the mountain was there during the flood or even at that height and unlikely anything would survive a stratovolcano erupting over and over as it builds itself up to the size of the mountain it is today. So no I didn’t quickly dismiss it just because it wasn’t the site we are researching.
@@DiscoveredMedia thank you for your kind reply. I didn't know all the facts about the mountain's volcanic nature. I know so very little about all this stuff but I'm very interested. Take care my friend. God bless you all
Genesis 11:2, KJV: "And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there." Shinar is in modern day Iraq. Turkey is in northwest of Iraq, not in the east of Iraq. Hence the ark didn't land in Turkey. The ark landed in the Himalayas. From the Himalayas, Noah's family went to Iraq. But of course not right away. They settled in the Indus Valley first. That's why the Indus Valley is indeed the birthplace of civilization.
Let's give credit where credit's due Ron Wyatt discovered this either in the late 70s very early 80s God let him find this he also found the Ark of the Covenant do your research people
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
Ron Wyatt said the the ark had come to a stop higher on the ridge and then the lava or mud flow had pushed it down to the current site. THat the bottom of the art was still there and the flow had pushed the upper part of the boat to the current site. Have you seen any signs of that and can you take pictures of that? That has to be the site because the day they let the animals out of the ark, the scriptures say that Noah and probably with the help of his son had put built a humed alter to the Lordout of rough stone and jad sacrificed several bulls and or lambs or goats to the Lord the very same day. Seems like Ron said it was between the ark and lower down the hi nearer Noah's House.
Hi Robert, I’ve been up to the original landing site valley many times but still need to go over the area better and haven’t gone over each square inch to find the part of the bottom that Ron said he saw up there. So still more work to do there. I’ve also seen the stele inscription marker on the border right above the landing site. The altar and house site Ron talks about is about 20 miles away in the village of Arzap just northwest of Dogubayazit.
Has anyone considered making a lateral cut through the middle of the site to be sure that the ark is what we have observing? One lateral cut either lengthwise or widthwise would tell a lot, both would even be better. I also have been following this for years and I, for one, would love to know definitively one way or the other.
@@stevenhird1837 you're absolutely correct. It's an ancient landslide which seem to have inundated an object in the form of a great ship. Anyone with eyes a d a brain could see that.
@@stevenhird1837 go and confirm it at the site if you are so sure it's just a landslide. And come back to post again after you gather the evidence to back up your claim.
when are we going to excavate and see inside, I see the Chinees have already been inside and posted video's of their findings, so what's keeping us from getting video of inside if it's already accessible?
Oh yea the fraud fake ark up on Ararat planted in the glacier was shown in 2010 and then in 2014 etc. This location is along the border with Iran and the Turks just don't let anyone come over with a shovel to dig. Thankfully we are working with Turkish scientists to do the preliminary work on the site before any excavations can be done. More news coming soon on this project happening this year.
@@DiscoveredMedia Almost five thousand years later, as the Hebrew priests in Babylonian captivity sought to trace the Jewish people back to Adam, they found great difficulty in piecing the story together; and it occurred to one of them to abandon the effort, to let the whole world drown in its wickedness at the time of Noah’s flood, and thus to be in a better position to trace Abraham right back to one of the three surviving sons of Noah. Mount Ararat was the sacred mountain of northern Mesopotamia, and since much of your tradition of these ancient times was acquired in connection with the Babylonian story of the flood, it is not surprising that Mount Ararat and its region were woven into the later Jewish story of Noah and the universal flood. But Noah really lived; he was a wine maker of Aram, a river settlement near Erech. He kept a written record of the days of the river’s rise from year to year. He brought much ridicule upon himself by going up and down the river valley advocating that all houses be built of wood, boat fashion, and that the family animals be put on board each night as the flood season approached. He would go to the neighboring river settlements every year and warn them that in so many days the floods would come. Finally a year came in which the annual floods were greatly augmented by unusually heavy rainfall so that the sudden rise of the waters wiped out the entire village; only Noah and his immediate family were saved in their houseboat. These floods completed the disruption of Andite civilization. With the ending of this period of deluge, the second garden was no more. Only in the south and among the Sumerians did any trace of the former glory remain. ruclips.net/video/OrDNpRJFKU8/видео.html
Yes but we are just waiting for the borders to reopen due to the coronavirus. We hope to do tours again in September and October. We will let everyone know on all the websites we run and the email lists and on the social media platforms. You can add your name to the interest list by filling out the contact form here eastturkeyexpedition.com/contact-us/ and checking off the newsletter box. Also, our tour web site is here: eastturkeyexpedition.com/tours/noahs-ark/ Blessings!
Seriously stupid people...so they havnt excavated a single thing and they are profiting off of your money by doing tours through a mere claim and no actual visual evidence....like a piece of wood with your eyes.
@@SDL-xu7em Video's nice looking though. Previous expeditions have cored and found nothing but natural phenomena. The problem is that when you expect to find something, you will likely see only what fits your expectations. Personally, I believe the ark did exist in ancient history, but don't hold that it must be found to justify my beliefs. The Wyatt guy was a complete flake--he said he discovered the Ark of the Covenant too, but again no evidence. Modern Don Quixotes...
@@dmedlin8118. Metal "rivets" have been found, and the metal has been tested. ( The resistivity scans that have been done on the ground have brought to light some interesting things)
I'm curious why after all these years there hasn't been any kind of excavation? How are we still doing radar type research decades after discovery? It's not that I don't believe it, if anything I'm just frustrated that this isn't a top priority.
I was wondering if your scanning the upper mud slide for the rest of the Ark Meaning the bottom of it. I have been quietly following this story since it was discovered in the 80s, I am 55 now and I know they found more of the Wood trapped further up in the ice where the Ark stopped after the flood. Anyone who can't see this is the real Noahs Ark is a lost soul.
So far we can't due to the location being right beside the Iranian border. Hopefully that upper site can be scanned/excavated in the future with proper permission. We have hiked all around there though.
@@DiscoveredMedia Thanks for the information regarding the situation. I will quietly be watching your channel with excitement. I was watching the Japanese Tsunami footage over Christmas because its coming up to the 10th anniversary of the earthquake. I am interested in how the earth works, Geology and it made me realise the shear power of water over land and the way is can totally alter the landscape and as if it was a message from God him self I started seeing Geology programs on the Hydroplate theory and it doesn't take the brain of a rocket scientist too add the Ark and the way the two plates separated. I watched the six part long dynamics documentary that used allot of physics too explain it and Wow I am a born again I swear 🙏 God be with you.
@@DiscoveredMedia just curious. What do you think about the other ark sightings? I know that they are somewhat sporadic and this is more than likely it, but I cant doubt a few of the other claims either.
@@lostamericanhistory2536 I'll be doing a video about the Ararat "sightings." But definitely being that it's a stratovolcano built on a flood plain deposit and all the sightings have it in a glacier which would shed itself and move the ark off the mountain or grind it up there is no way due to all this that the ark landed up there.
Ron Wyatt mentioned during a TV interview that he'd found pictographs near the site showing 8 people and a boat. Where are those pictures? That would really be something to see. Thank you
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The Turkish scientists are doing a complete geophysical survey of the site to better understand the location and help preserve it plus to use the data for future excavation attempts.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
I don't really think is Noah's Ark, but we never know, it might be. The Bible says the Ark landed on the "mountains of Ararat", many usually think it's referring to Mount Ararat, but it's most likely not, it doesn't say "mountain of Ararat" or "mountain Ararat", instead it says "mountains", in plural, there are 2 things it may refer and I'll explain why: 1 - Regional area with lots of mountains close to Mount Ararat: this area might have already been called Ararat a long time ago, before Mount Ararat, so it might be referring that the Ark landed on one of the mountains around this region, in case, the highest mountain in that region, which wasn't Ararat at the time, instead, it might have been other one; supporting this possible Ark, it might be the Durupinar site. Also, why the highest mountain? Well, in the Bible, after the Ark lands, a few months later, it says the tops of the other mountains could be seen, so it might mean the Ark landed on the highest mountain at that region. 2 - The Zagros Mountains on the Ancient Urartu: well, the word translated as Ararat, in the Hebrew Bible is HWRRT, which sounds like Ararat, but sounds more like Urart than Ararat, so it might be referring to the ancient region of Urartu, and the most likely place on Urartu for it to land is in the Zagros Mountains, as they fit the description of the Bible, if that is correct, then this Ark on the video is false. But why not Mount Ararat? As I said, the Bible says it landed on the "mountains of Ararat", and also, in other book on the Bible, I guess it's 2Kings 9:26, it refers Ararat as "the land of Ararat", implying that Ararat is a land, and not a mountain.
This is a world heritage site and needs too be protected. People randomly walking all over it will degrade the site. Amazing scanner images. Are we even older than we are been lead too believe. The Hydroplate hypothesis of how the great flood happened makes total sense.
The Bible says the ark landed in the "Mountains (plural) of Ararat" (Genesis 8:4) not "Mount Ararat." This site is in the mountains of Ararat and is 15-20 miles south of the large post flood volcano called Mount Ararat.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The Ark is wedged in a Glacier, at the 14,000 ft. Elevation. Huge timbers are there of Oak , which is called Gopherwood. The impression on the ground in this video is Not the Ark, but if IT keeps people from climbing up there and to destroy The Real Ark, then I understand why this is the claim. C. Lambert
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@carvinlambert6899 yes the ark is in the mountains of Ararat which include a larger area and is not just one mountain we call today Ararat. The site we are working on is in the mountains of Ararat as the Bible says.
Not the ark. Just fraud seeking money. We know the real ark has been explored and samples taken from it. That shape isn't even what the Bible says it was shaped like.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The supposed wooden ark on Ararat discovered in 2009 or 2010 is a fraud and locals will tell you all about how other locals did it. Those that did this fraud made millions off the Chinese Christian group sadly. Ararat is a post flood stratovolcano and the ark did not land there.
@@DiscoveredMedia and you are certain of this? I have only seen the videos, no real verification talk. Why couldn't the ark have landed there? It can land on a non active volcano. Are you just saying that it would have been burnt by past eruptions.
@@bloomerb4162 Ararat is built on a flood plain deposit from the global flood. Thus it was formed after the flood. The lava around it was all laid down on land and not underwater too. Thus it was formed not surrounded or under any water but after the flood. So any eruptions that formed this volcano would have destroyed any ark that landed on it if the mountain was even around in some shape or form. Plus all the eyewitness accounts of an "ark" on Ararat conflict with each other. This 2010 ark "discovery" story that the Chinese were promoting the locals again will tell you how their friends helped in getting old wood up there and putting in old food as if Noah left food there or others. Again no credible evidence for that claim.
Genesis 11:2, KJV: "And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there." Shinar is in modern day Iraq. Turkey is in northwest of Iraq, not in the east of Iraq. Hence the ark didn't land in Turkey. If you want to search for Noah's ark, go to the Himalayas. That is assuming that the ark is still there and not disassembled for its timber.
@@eastonvonschist2283 LOL and I have unicorn droppings great for growing everything, better than BS 😂 I can't believe Noah missed the unicorns (bummer) I bet that was the day he was in Australia rounding up Kangaroos , wallabies and duck billed platypus, or maybe he was at one of the poles sexing polar bears or penguins 🐧 . You don't want to get all the way back to Mesopotamia to find out you have 2 male penguins ( just cos it was a bit cold the day you determined their sex)
I’m deeply interested in your RUclips channel, please don’t think what I’m about to share is intended to be negative or hateful. I and many others have first hand experience to know that this isn’t the resting site of the great vessel, built by the Biblical character Noah. I used to believe it was until I took part in a UK backed expedition in the early 90’s, to investigate the Ararat Anomaly. I do feel the Ron Wyatt location warrants architectural merit as a site of interest, but it’s not the Ark. Our brief was given after original satellite images showed a structural anomaly, thought to be the remains of an ancient monastery or man made building. We also had exclusive viewing of short footage taken by the Russian Imperial Army on mount Ararat between 1900 and 1917. It was of poor quality, clearly shot with an early aeroscope camera. It showed the soldiers walking down a huge dark wall that appeared to be made of timber. The soldiers were also firing what appeared to be their berdan rifles into the structure. Before our UK funded expedition to Turkey, we managed to examine in great detail, the Ararat Anomaly satellite images on an IBM PS computer. It showed an object, or objects located on Ararat at approximately 15000 feet from the the summit. The images showed what appeared to be a linear man made structure that had broken into at least 2 large pieces. The structure or structures appeared to be joined at some point but had been damaged by the deep glacier it was buried in. The weather was unusually mild for the summer and had resulted in large parts of the object to be exposed. From the evidence we gathered, it had 3 levels with a central atrium running the entire length. The atrium we estimated served no other purpose other than to allow light to reach all the levels. We had no way of estimating the size of the structure given that most of it was under the ice. The material it was constructed from was timber, that had either blackened from age or had some type of coating added. It was felt that the latter applied and this enabled its survival. Our time at the location was short but was long enough for this object to be documented with hundreds of supporting photographs and camcorder footage. Everyone who witnessed this vast object couldn’t help but be moved with great awe and wonderment.
There was an excavation, or I should say still is ongoing, into the structures you're talking about. It was a Chinese Christian group with some other folks. Look up mt ararat structure here on RUclips. I'll bet it's the same place you're talking about. It's under ice so many thousands of feet up. Has what appeared to be stables and corridors. The outer walls were said to have black coating on them. Throughout history, many different people, some famous, spoke of climbing to the ark. Take care
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@76e85 800 years after Adam. 5-ply lamina wood, riveted for strength, 3 decks. There is a full sized replica in Tenessee built as a tourist attraction and education centre. They detail the construction and run courses on flood geology. They really weren't dumb people. At the time of the flood the global population was about the same as ours today. They could move 5000 ton rocks and their knowledge metallurgy can't be replicated even today.
@@voiceofreason162 thats so cool, i didnt think id be so invested on this but my foot's already in the water, imma just dive right in. Thanks for the link and answering my questions!
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
I thank that really is noahs ark from way back then the 8 people that where chosen to repopulate the world through the righteous blood line of noah and his wife and three sons and there wifes. God cleanse the world of sin with the flood to start a new. Even tho the world was still tainted and still in the devils hands just reshuffled. And the world today is like it was maybe BUT with computer technologys and cars and what ever knowledge have brought forth. Hope noahs ark can some day be carefully uncovered and renewed some how. Good luck.
She does look like a grand boat of some kind, but Noah's ship? Didn't that run aground in the mountains of Ararat, why yes it did, NOT Sinai. No idea who this one belonged to, Gilgamesh? Can both stories be true perhaps? Both talking about the same event?
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@DiscoveredMedia then please be respectful and mention that it was Rin Wyatss original discovery and analysis of site in your videos. Otherwise you are misleading people by not stating that you are only continuing and building upon HIS work!!!
@@georgiacollett2235 obviously we are researching the same site he researched in the 1980s. No one here is claiming to have found this nor that we are the first to do research on it. This video update was about the new research we are attempting to do with the Turks not a retelling of the story of the site and how it was found etc. I met Ron twice in high school and college and also talked with him many hours on the phone since I first learned of his work in 1990 while in middle school. Relax.
@@DiscoveredMedia I still think it's only right that he should be mentioned as the founder of the site at the start of your video. Many will not have seen your previous videos, like myself and will assume it as your discovery or have no knowledge of Ron Wyatts work.
@@georgiacollett2235 we can’t do the work for people who don’t look up our stuff based on one video. 🤣 if someone wants to think that then that’s their fault. But definitely our motives is not to steal anyone’s credit. 👍🙏
Boy! This is really CONFUSING! What about that other, much more famous ship three quarters covered with ice and snow? The one the CIA took aerial photos of??? The one folks have been visiting and writing about for nearly 3000 years! Have you not looked at THAT one??
Todo el que vea este comentario que cree en el señor Jesucristo diga en voz alta jesus te recibo como mi señor y mi salvador unico amen os aseguro que os ira bien amen probad hacerla y vivireis amén
This is it. It is less than a mile to the house that Noah built with rocks and wood. And the house is near the unhumed alter that Noah and his son made the same day they disembarked from the Ark. Noah sacrificed the extra lambs, bulls and goats theu.took aboard the ark to thank God.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
Sorry. But I haven't seen enough proof to confirm this location. It looks to me like an eroded hill that is very similar to other landscape in the area. If it is truly a possibility, then do a grid style excavation of a segment of the outer wall and confirm it with samples of buried or petrified wood. Maybe even some types of fasteners or tools made of bronze. Until then, you're just looking silly.
MP this was already done in the 70s with ron wyatt. There's a video documentary where they pulled the petrified wood, used metal detectors which detected consecutive patterns, anchor stones, etc. And just recently with new 3d technology it is confirmed to be a ship. So we have the evidence
Ron Wyatt was a huckster. He also claimed to have found Noah's Ark, Sodom and Gomorrah, Mt. Sinai, the remains of Pharoah's army at the bottom of the Red Sea, the Ark of the Covenant, the Ten Commandment stones and much more. Many of his claims have been proven by Christian archeologists as FLAT OUT LIES. Ron Wyatt did more damage to Christian archeology than anyone in history. I have read his books and the claims he made are just complete lies.
@@rickd1412 Ron Wyatt wasn't the 1st to discover the Ark, it was the Turkish military. They couldn't excavate it at that time. Ron Wyatt came across the information and revisited it. Also he had multiple experts in different fields of knowledge involved. It would be one thing if it was just him alone but it wasn't
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The measurement of the that ark was totally wrong and there was some steel materials used on that ark and that time steel was not yet discovered. Mount Ararat is not the highest mountain in the world and it was short of 12,000 ft. to Mount Everest. GOD BLESS.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
AMAZING!!! To see that the first built Ship in the world - built by giants, had as it's designer the Master Architect...God Himself. WOW!! Unbelievable!
@@8ColousBIT I'm always open to proper information or knowledge. So please inform me about any manmade ship(s) prior to the one built by Noah. I'll patiently wait for your reply.
@@8ColousBIT I really do appreciate your response. We may not really differ as it may have seem after all. Let me put it this way. But before I say anything else, I would like to make it clear that it is only speculation on my part. I don't believe that the Bible goes into details or is it specific on a lot of things. Therefore I believe that this discussion concerning ships or boats that may or may not have existed before the great flood is not important salvation wise. It is one of the reasons why I believe God saw fit to exclude certain topics from the Bible. God's main focus is on saving us, not satisfying our curiosity. My opinion may be a minority opinion, but I have thought about these things a lot, and have done quite a bit of research due to my own curiosity. The Bible makes it clear that before the great global flood the earth spoke one language. The earth I could also assume had basically one climate - or perhaps it didn't fluctuate from one extreme to another extreme. Now taking these few details into consideration, I therefore assume that there would have been one race of people. I hold that position because I know that the climate on a global scale changed drastically after the flood. Places that never experienced the presence of snow and ice, was now buried in it. Places that were once lush and green and fertile, are now barren and dry. When God confounded the language of mankind during the tower of Babel, civilization was splintered, and scattered out to the four corners of the earth. God placed in all living things the ability to cope and change with the environment - which brought about the different races of men. Now let me return back to the time before the great flood. Since the world population at that time spoke a single language - also consisted of only one race - the youthful earth having an ideal environment, humanity practically lived lives of seeming pleasure. There harbour no need to spread out across the globe. Why risk one's life and venture into the unknown verdant forests full of strange and frightening beasts and huge reptiles. In my opinion I feel that humanity did not venture far from where God first created the first human pair. Think of it - it was the location of Paradise - the Garden of Eden, a place of perfection. The Bible claims that it never rained prior to the flood, but the earth was watered by a mist which rises up in the evening and water the whole surface of the earth. Why would anyone want to build a ship in such a perfect environment - and then go where? To another forested unknown region harbouring huge gigantic frightful animals? It would have feel much safer remaining with your other human companions - there is strength in unity. It is not to say that smaller boats were not built to traverse streams and rivers...but why build a ship? When Noah began to preach about the coming global cataclysm, he need not have ventured far. The Bible said that when Cain fled from the presence of God, he established himself in the land of Nod. Apparently the land of Nod must not have been too far from where the worshipers of God, or Seth's offspring (the Godly or those that retain their loyalty to God) resided. They remained near the vicinity of the Gates of Eden. Noah's Ark was a spectacle to the world in those days.The question was why would a man build such a huge ship in such a perfect environment, and away from any large body of water? The only conclusion was that he must be crazy. So ironically he drew the crowds, which allowed him to warn the world of his day of the coming destruction of the earth.
@@8ColousBIT I do not disagree that the pre-flood civilization was very advanced. Because it wasn't too long after the fall of man that inventions began to take place. For example the descendants of Cain invented certain musical instruments, and developed metallurgy etc. Many asian countries like Japan for example retain certain knowledge about wood joinery which has been almost lost to western countries. They can actually build a structure without nails or dowels. You mentioned about carbon dating etc, and why you believe that the evidence shows that humanity can be dated back to over 200,000 years. I have serious issues with carbon dating, and that humanity goes back hundreds of thousands of years. Allow me to give a few examples why I do not subscribe to these long ages of time. Let us say that on the day that God created man, and then was examined by a doctor who had time traveled back to the past, (this is a hypothetical example). The doctor looked him over and medically examined him, all the while not knowing anything about God's creative power. The doctor's report would read that Adam is a man about 25 to 30 years old and in perfect health. No matter how sincere the doctor would feel about his report, he would be nonetheless sincerely wrong. The doctor did not take into consideration the creative power of God. Adam would tell the doctor that he haven't even been alive for a week as yet, but that he's just only a day old. The doctor would say that his carbon dating shows that the man is at least 25 yrs old. But he would be wrong. So things may appear to be of great ages, but that may not necessarily be the case. Another example is that basically nearly all ancient civilizations can be dated back to between 4,000 to 7,000 years ago. The invention of writing also dates to that time period more or less. I believe the scattered remains of human bones found around the world that scientists claim to be over 200,000 years are actually post flood remains. Which interestingly would make them 5,000 to 4,000 years old. Far younger than the great ages that today's scientists attach to them. I believe that they are misreading the fossil record. You mentioned about the huge mega monuments, and enormous blocks of stone, obviously worked by human hands. Again, due to my research, I conclude that most, if not all of these are probably post flood constructions. Like I mentioned earlier, I believe that after the fall of man (approximately 6,000 years ago), humanity remained concentrated in a specific area in the Middle East region - perhaps the region of southern Iraq and the Persian Gulf area. So far I do not believe any preflood human remains have been discovered as yet. (If they have been discovered, then they may have been kept secret from the public). The reason I give for them not being discovered, is that God totally buried them under the waters of the Persian Gulf. According to the Bible humans were created as giants in the beginning just as the animals were created as giants. As soon as men left the Ark, their longevity began to decrease as well as their stature. It is only logical to assume that if nearly all fossils of animals were huge sizes, humans most certainly must also have been of giant size. It would be unsual for God to pay a visit to an adverage height Adam of just 5' 7" tall, while the height of God would be about 18 feet tall - and all the animals around of gigantic proportions. If Og king of Bashan was at least 13 to 14 feet tall, then I'm sure God must have been taller, and so was Adam, for all humanity descended from Adam and Eve. Any other view would not be supported by the Bible. Those descendants of Noah which left the Ark, I believe are responsible for the huge monumental structures found around the world. The giants of antiquity were our ancestors, and the descendants of Noah and his three sons, Shem, Japheth and Ham - all being giant in statue. But as time went on everything, including man decreased in size to what it is today.
@@8ColousBIT you have stated some interesting and informative points which is worth contemplating. But archaeological discoveries, and other scientific evidence which I have examined tend to support the accuracy of of the Bible. Scientific theories are constantly being changed and revised. Most of the theories pertaining to ancient man - geology, astronomy quantum physics etc. are constantly being changed and or discarded as being unworkable. For example Darwin's book on the origin of species. The book is so out dated I doubt that it's even used in the schools. But of course he is considered the father the scientific principle of the evolutionary theory - a foundation upon which modern science rest. A flimsy foundation indeed, because most of what Darwin considered to be the workings of evolution, is in fact adaptation - or change occurring within a species. No jump from a dog to a cat. Dogs remained dogs from the beginning of time until today, same as every other species. The only difference is that there may be variations in the species, but no jump from one species to another. Even though that is what is proposed as scientific fact. The difference is that God's Word is dependable, trustworthy and unchanging. Psalm 119:105 states, "Thy Word is a Lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. How can I not believe and accept those trustworthy words, when the very One that I refer to as my Lord and God also was sustained by those Words. The servant is not greater than the Master. If the Master upholds the servant complies. Jesus took the story of Noah and the rest of Genesis as a literal events. And I concur wholeheartedly. Yes I have read that some of the ancient writers downplayed the fact that Goliath was as large as stated in scripture. My response to that is that they then have a lot of explaining to do. If I'm not mistaken, Goliath's coat of mail would just be to heavy for any ordinary man, except he was of a huge statue. His spear the Bible claims was like a weavers beam. A spear fit for a giant. To understand how chemistry works, there are certain formulas and rules which must be applied. The same as with Physics and Mathematics. The Bible is govern by similar principles. The Bible is not a book Shakespeare that one picks up and expect grasp it's meaning. One must lay aside their ego. They must leave all their baggage behind, and change their mode of thinking. The natural man must have a change of mindset from the natural to the spiritual. God is the law-Maker. He has created the natural laws to govern nature. But there are times He chooses to override natural law. For to comprehend God one must become spiritual minded. For the natural mind cannot grasp the things of the Bible, because he's using the wrong formula. He must be spiritual minded to understand biblical truths.
No, Noah's Ark was not the first vessel, but the largest wooden vessel up to date, and it wasn't built by giants, nowhere on the Bible implies Noah and his family were giants, and yes, God designed the Ark, and designed it good.
Yeah, except the ark was box shaped. This is a scam. However, the real ark has been explored and samples taken from it, higher up the mountain. We know that Noah lived at the base of the mountain. We know there are many artifacts from the ark, still in the area. I believe this is a building that was built after the flood, not the ark itself.. the shape is all wrong.
Genesis 11:2, KJV: "And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there." Shinar is in modern day Iraq. Turkey is in northwest of Iraq, not in the east of Iraq. Hence the ark didn't land in Turkey.
Don't think that ron got this right at all just look at the direction each son went vs how they have laid out the sons land. I think it was much further at least thousand miles from that area is where the ark landed.
While I hope this is the resting place of The Ark I just don't see how it could be. The Ark would have to been massive to contain all the animals and this doesn't look as though it would be big enough. I do welcome correction though.
Well it is the Biblical length given in Genesis (aka 300 cubits). We believe Moses wrote the book of Genesis and would have used the known measurement of the day which was the royal Egyptian cubit. That would place the ark at around 515 feet or so in length which is exactly what this site is.
Noah’s ark is going to be disappear some thing I don’t understand why they don’t protect it ??? Or build something on top to protect whatever is left otherwise few years from now it’s not gonna be there
Most likely not as ancient historians wrote about people visiting the ark remains up through the time of Christ so the ark wasn’t totally dismantled and it was big vessel.
We are most grateful for all the support and prayers for the research! Thank you for considering joining our monthly members web site so that we can continue the Noah's ark work this year!
I forget if there has been scans around the area of the ark to show the difference?
Steve Haukdahl nothing really in-depth has been done outside of the boat formation to compare. Only a few small scans but not good enough for a comparison study. The resistivity scans in 2014 did go outside of the boat.
@@DiscoveredMedia a comparison video to show would be helpful in recruiting skeptics.
What is the purpose of an excavation? It sound destructive.
@@Btw_visit_____todacarne-com Yea the Turkish archaeologists who would be doing this would do it in a professional manner and are professionals themselves and would do their best to minimize damage yet maximize our understanding of what is below ground and determine what we are seeing in the geophysical surveys.
Why is this the first time I’m hearing about this?! Why was this not the find of our entire history?! I mean, I’ve always been a believer but it sure is nice to finally have these stories confirmed. It renews my faith. God bless those who refused to give up on this site.
This was discovered, confirmed and broadcast back in the 80's by American and Turkish archeologists, physicist, etc. 20/20 did a special on it as well. Maybe you were not born then, but this is not new!
You answered your own question. You are a believer living in a satanic world that hates the truth.they don’t want more evidence to support our faith in the holy scriptures.
Also ask your church that question
Check my playlists. If this impresses you, wait until you see the DNA evidence for Christ. And there is stuff on the archaeology of Sodom & Gammorrah, also real. Archaeology of Israel and data on the Red Sea findings where Israel crossed over. Not to mention a ton of mathematics that show that the underlying accuracy and transmission of the Bible is intact.
Because it's BS .there were 8 people on the ark to feed and care for over 2 million creature's if they didn't sleep or rest they spent approx 43 seconds caring for each creature by the time they fed the last creature ,the first one they fed would have been dead from starvation . Stop accepting the bible as gospel ( no pun intended) do some real scientific research. It's a good story but that's all it is a story,myth fable. Sorry to piss on your parade
Approximately halfway through the video there is a radar imaging of the buried ship. It seem to show evenly spaced ribs of a ship. Almost like the buried remains of a Viking ship during excavations. I would be happy to get an answer whether the radar does show the ribs or partial framework of this buried vessel. Many thanks, and keep up the good work.
Possibly or the walls or partitions to rooms. The radar is definitely showing angular structure at different depths below the ground. If this was a natural object of mud and rock you wouldn't expect to find such right angles and straight lines.
@@DiscoveredMedia thank you for the answer, it was very helpful. This is definitely a buried ship of gigantic proportions high up in mountainous terrain. There is no other explanation. God seem to have a way of confounding the skeptics.
@@sethflores1680 Very true!!!
@@sethflores1680 Check out our latest video showing more of the radar scans.
@@DiscoveredMedia
Not to throw water on your ideas.
If you're talking in general terms, clear angles and straight lines normally not possible under typical deformation and stress.
The most boxy types of rocks are Basalt and this picture below has some near right angles.
live.staticflickr .com/3138/3076603417_89bae5f5e0_b.jpg
SO if this is/was Noah's ark....what is the large (although broken), wooden structure with multiple levels buried in rock/glacier 12,000-13,000 feet up Mt. Ararat?
A hoax
Could it be possible that there were two arks tethered together because a Chinese exploration team have found an ark on mount Ararat and they have filmed and photographs of its internal cavities?
Could it have been just an ancient building? Like a village or temple?
Brother If you are not around mount ararat the which mountain is it? Please reply. I want to know the exact name of the mountain and the place where you were besides the ark..
Brother are you standing on Mount judi?
It's 15-20 miles south of Mount Ararat goo.gl/maps/ggZJdunaa4V7rwdR9 it's in the "mountains of Ararat" as the Bible says. Local villagers do call the area there "Judi/Cudi" so the name given in the Quran matches as well.
Excitement is building! Thanks for the 3d look! 😲👍🏼
Glad you can finally see some of the results! Blessings!
@@DiscoveredMedia 🙏🏼
I would love to visit the Ark sometime!
Check out our 3 and 5 day tours: eastturkeyexpedition.com/
Better late than never. I watched Ron Wyatt videos years ago from the 80's
Yea we are continuing the research he started and hopefully the Turks will excavate the site which he never got to do.
Ron never ever wanted to Excavate the Site. He knew it was nearby. He wanted it be left for others to see and not to harm ANY BIBLICAL SITE.
@@carvinlambert6899 no that’s not true. He tried many times to excavate it and get funding and even once was promised a permit but was taken hostage by terrorists a few days later. You need to read up on the history of his work at the site and watch videos of his meetings. He wanted many times to do some form of excavation to ultimately prove what’s there.
@@DiscoveredMedia
Hello, I appreciate the work you're doing. I want to know if a Chinese group of excavators found the Ark and was able to examine certain parts of it.
Thank you
@@JRenee-Sings No the Chinese are interested in a site high up on the mountain that is a hoax. No excavations have been done at that site.
The Ark of the Covenant is a rectangle box but the Hebrew word "Ark" here is not the same Hebrew word "Ark" used for Noah's Ark.
The Hebrew word "Ark" for Noah's Ark is the same Hebrew word "Ark" word which is used for the "Box" (a rectangle box to float, with no navigation) Moses was placed in in the Nile, as a baby.
And, the retangle box allowed for maximum cargo capacity, which is greatly reduced by modern day boat shape/design.
As is pointed out here by the Christian ministry that runs Ark Encounters who made this display the book of Genesis does not say the ark was a rectangular box. ruclips.net/user/postUgxTRsCOBIPUMZ4uRpR4AaABCQ
Ron Wyatt Was The Only One To Discover All Of These Sites Giving To Him By The Lord🌍📖
Would like some detail on how the door was built into the side of the ark, and the timbers found showing little to no evidence of growth rings in the wood. This would help clarify the mystery for some, that we did not have 4 seasons before the flood, only after the flood for they are 1st mentioned at the covenant of the rainbow. The first 12 chapters of the book of Genesis are written with information presented sequentially and spacially. More info on titanium rivets and aluminum metal found there would be awsome too. Don't know if such scanners can look at the cross grain laminated construction but if such could be done, wow, could help others to realize that the bible is true.
this is on Mount Judi.. if you are a truly truth seeker..please stick to it for God's sake~!
I'm not familiar with the written account. If there was a powerful world wide flood, would Noah's family needed the materials from the Ark at that time when the waters receded? Would they not have disassembled it? Just a question.
He possibly used some of it though not all. We have many historical ancient records of people visiting the ark up through the time of Christ so we know the ship remains were still there 1000s of years later after the flood and not destroyed.
@@DiscoveredMedia don't the historical accounts say they had to climb mt ararat? I wouldn't dismiss the structures on the mountain so quickly. Do you have any ide how hard it would be to find 5000 year old wood, carry it thousands of feet up a mountain, build it then cover it with ice and rock? You say it was proven to be a hoax. I've read that your site has been proven to be an odd shaped rock formation. Not saying it is. Just saying that because someone dismisses something as fake doesn't necessarily make it so
@@nobodyspecial6513 yea good point on not being quick to dismiss a site based on what others say. But based on talking to locals in that area of what they did to put the wood on the hot summer days up there over a few years and then taking the Chinese to the site after they had frozen in place during the winter and knowing that Ararat is a stratovolcano and knowing it was built on a plain laid down by the flood per geology I would find it highly unlikely that the mountain was there during the flood or even at that height and unlikely anything would survive a stratovolcano erupting over and over as it builds itself up to the size of the mountain it is today. So no I didn’t quickly dismiss it just because it wasn’t the site we are researching.
@@DiscoveredMedia thank you for your kind reply. I didn't know all the facts about the mountain's volcanic nature. I know so very little about all this stuff but I'm very interested. Take care my friend. God bless you all
@@nobodyspecial6513 Blessings to you too! Have a great weekend!
Noah was a great man.
Porfect video. People need coming and see have very good area.
Thanks!!
ruclips.net/video/f_PHUjMb7iw/видео.html
Heads Up Ararat is opening up again 👍
Yep I've seen it all over the news here in Turkey too.
Ron Wyatt found all this!! Why do they keep his work under the radar?
This is the birthplace of humanity after the great flood. This is Noah's Ark. God blessed 🙏 Ron Wyatt and the Wyatt family.
Genesis 11:2, KJV: "And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there."
Shinar is in modern day Iraq. Turkey is in northwest of Iraq, not in the east of Iraq. Hence the ark didn't land in Turkey. The ark landed in the Himalayas. From the Himalayas, Noah's family went to Iraq. But of course not right away. They settled in the Indus Valley first. That's why the Indus Valley is indeed the birthplace of civilization.
I'm so interested to find out if this is it. Seems to match ancient archaeological evidence
We will keep everyone updated! :-)
A recent video suggests there’s multiple layers. Indicating deck layers!
The Quran fails on so many levels I don't know where to start.👎
@@johnstown2451 they proved all of this decades ago.
Let's give credit where credit's due Ron Wyatt discovered this either in the late 70s very early 80s God let him find this he also found the Ark of the Covenant do your research people
What reason is there to assert that this is Noah's Ark as opposed to saying that they're researching the possibility?
Mount Sinai is in Arabia.Galatians tells by Paul the apostle.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
I came here because of Ron Wyatt... who found this first but thankyou for the update ^^
Yep he did all that hard early work on the site in the 1970s-1990s! God bless!
Ron Wyatt said the the ark had come to a stop higher on the ridge and then the lava or mud flow had pushed it down to the current site. THat the bottom of the art was still there and the flow had pushed the upper part of the boat to the current site. Have you seen any signs of that and can you take pictures of that?
That has to be the site because the day they let the animals out of the ark, the scriptures say that Noah and probably with the help of his son had put built a humed alter to the Lordout of rough stone and jad sacrificed several bulls and or lambs or goats to the Lord the very same day. Seems like Ron said it was between the ark and lower down the hi nearer Noah's House.
Hi Robert, I’ve been up to the original landing site valley many times but still need to go over the area better and haven’t gone over each square inch to find the part of the bottom that Ron said he saw up there. So still more work to do there. I’ve also seen the stele inscription marker on the border right above the landing site. The altar and house site Ron talks about is about 20 miles away in the village of Arzap just northwest of Dogubayazit.
Has anyone considered making a lateral cut through the middle of the site to be sure that the ark is what we have observing? One lateral cut either lengthwise or widthwise would tell a lot, both would even be better. I also have been following this for years and I, for one, would love to know definitively one way or the other.
Definitely the Turkish archaeologists and geologists will do a careful study of the site.
Wow, Beautiful Drone footage.
Many thanks!
Such a monumental discovery wow!!!
Thanks to Ron Wyatt
It’s just a land slide Check it out
@@stevenhird1837 you're absolutely correct. It's an ancient landslide which seem to have inundated an object in the form of a great ship. Anyone with eyes a d a brain could see that.
@@stevenhird1837 go and confirm it at the site if you are so sure it's just a landslide. And come back to post again after you gather the evidence to back up your claim.
when are we going to excavate and see inside, I see the Chinees have already been inside and posted video's of their findings, so what's keeping us from getting video of inside if it's already accessible?
Oh yea the fraud fake ark up on Ararat planted in the glacier was shown in 2010 and then in 2014 etc. This location is along the border with Iran and the Turks just don't let anyone come over with a shovel to dig. Thankfully we are working with Turkish scientists to do the preliminary work on the site before any excavations can be done. More news coming soon on this project happening this year.
@@DiscoveredMedia Almost five thousand years later, as the Hebrew priests in Babylonian captivity sought to trace the Jewish people back to Adam, they found great difficulty in piecing the story together; and it occurred to one of them to abandon the effort, to let the whole world drown in its wickedness at the time of Noah’s flood, and thus to be in a better position to trace Abraham right back to one of the three surviving sons of Noah. Mount Ararat was the sacred mountain of northern Mesopotamia, and since much of your tradition of these ancient times was acquired in connection with the Babylonian story of the flood, it is not surprising that Mount Ararat and its region were woven into the later Jewish story of Noah and the universal flood. But Noah really lived; he was a wine maker of Aram, a river settlement near Erech. He kept a written record of the days of the river’s rise from year to year. He brought much ridicule upon himself by going up and down the river valley advocating that all houses be built of wood, boat fashion, and that the family animals be put on board each night as the flood season approached. He would go to the neighboring river settlements every year and warn them that in so many days the floods would come. Finally a year came in which the annual floods were greatly augmented by unusually heavy rainfall so that the sudden rise of the waters wiped out the entire village; only Noah and his immediate family were saved in their houseboat. These floods completed the disruption of Andite civilization. With the ending of this period of deluge, the second garden was no more. Only in the south and among the Sumerians did any trace of the former glory remain. ruclips.net/video/OrDNpRJFKU8/видео.html
Are you doing any future tours for people who wish to go see these sites?
Yes but we are just waiting for the borders to reopen due to the coronavirus. We hope to do tours again in September and October. We will let everyone know on all the websites we run and the email lists and on the social media platforms. You can add your name to the interest list by filling out the contact form here eastturkeyexpedition.com/contact-us/ and checking off the newsletter box. Also, our tour web site is here: eastturkeyexpedition.com/tours/noahs-ark/ Blessings!
Seriously stupid people...so they havnt excavated a single thing and they are profiting off of your money by doing tours through a mere claim and no actual visual evidence....like a piece of wood with your eyes.
@@SDL-xu7em Video's nice looking though. Previous expeditions have cored and found nothing but natural phenomena. The problem is that when you expect to find something, you will likely see only what fits your expectations. Personally, I believe the ark did exist in ancient history, but don't hold that it must be found to justify my beliefs. The Wyatt guy was a complete flake--he said he discovered the Ark of the Covenant too, but again no evidence. Modern Don Quixotes...
@@SDL-xu7em I see your point but it looks like they are trying to scientifically prove if this is Noahs Ark.
@@dmedlin8118. Metal "rivets" have been found, and the metal has been tested. ( The resistivity scans that have been done on the ground have brought to light some interesting things)
I like the split rock friend =D
I'm curious why after all these years there hasn't been any kind of excavation? How are we still doing radar type research decades after discovery? It's not that I don't believe it, if anything I'm just frustrated that this isn't a top priority.
I was wondering if your scanning the upper mud slide for the rest of the Ark Meaning the bottom of it. I have been quietly following this story since it was discovered in the 80s, I am 55 now and I know they found more of the Wood trapped further up in the ice where the Ark stopped after the flood. Anyone who can't see this is the real Noahs Ark is a lost soul.
So far we can't due to the location being right beside the Iranian border. Hopefully that upper site can be scanned/excavated in the future with proper permission. We have hiked all around there though.
@@DiscoveredMedia Thanks for the information regarding the situation. I will quietly be watching your channel with excitement. I was watching the Japanese Tsunami footage over Christmas because its coming up to the 10th anniversary of the earthquake. I am interested in how the earth works, Geology and it made me realise the shear power of water over land and the way is can totally alter the landscape and as if it was a message from God him self I started seeing Geology programs on the Hydroplate theory and it doesn't take the brain of a rocket scientist too add the Ark and the way the two plates separated. I watched the six part long dynamics documentary that used allot of physics too explain it and Wow I am a born again I swear 🙏 God be with you.
Why are you so sure this is noahs ark?
@@DiscoveredMedia just curious. What do you think about the other ark sightings? I know that they are somewhat sporadic and this is more than likely it, but I cant doubt a few of the other claims either.
@@lostamericanhistory2536 I'll be doing a video about the Ararat "sightings." But definitely being that it's a stratovolcano built on a flood plain deposit and all the sightings have it in a glacier which would shed itself and move the ark off the mountain or grind it up there is no way due to all this that the ark landed up there.
Ron Wyatt mentioned during a TV interview that he'd found pictographs near the site showing 8 people and a boat. Where are those pictures? That would really be something to see.
Thank you
We have a video coming up about that. Those were found 1.25 miles up the hill on the Turkish-Iranian border.
Awesome...thank you
thx
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
My question is, where did it launch from.
The Bible doesn't say so not sure.
@@DiscoveredMediaI cant help but wonder if it was from the N. American continent. A lot of evidence is showing that the flood originated here
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
so what about the iron braces found in the Ark?
They were with Noah's iron belt to stop his trousers falling down!
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
To awesome! Just became a member!
Awesome!!
Amen Yahweh
Why now. If we've known for a very long time. What is the significance now.. is something trying to be said. Is it do to happen again.
The Turkish scientists are doing a complete geophysical survey of the site to better understand the location and help preserve it plus to use the data for future excavation attempts.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@BossHossStudios a troll.
I don't really think is Noah's Ark, but we never know, it might be. The Bible says the Ark landed on the "mountains of Ararat", many usually think it's referring to Mount Ararat, but it's most likely not, it doesn't say "mountain of Ararat" or "mountain Ararat", instead it says "mountains", in plural, there are 2 things it may refer and I'll explain why:
1 - Regional area with lots of mountains close to Mount Ararat: this area might have already been called Ararat a long time ago, before Mount Ararat, so it might be referring that the Ark landed on one of the mountains around this region, in case, the highest mountain in that region, which wasn't Ararat at the time, instead, it might have been other one; supporting this possible Ark, it might be the Durupinar site. Also, why the highest mountain? Well, in the Bible, after the Ark lands, a few months later, it says the tops of the other mountains could be seen, so it might mean the Ark landed on the highest mountain at that region.
2 - The Zagros Mountains on the Ancient Urartu: well, the word translated as Ararat, in the Hebrew Bible is HWRRT, which sounds like Ararat, but sounds more like Urart than Ararat, so it might be referring to the ancient region of Urartu, and the most likely place on Urartu for it to land is in the Zagros Mountains, as they fit the description of the Bible, if that is correct, then this Ark on the video is false.
But why not Mount Ararat? As I said, the Bible says it landed on the "mountains of Ararat", and also, in other book on the Bible, I guess it's 2Kings 9:26, it refers Ararat as "the land of Ararat", implying that Ararat is a land, and not a mountain.
This is a world heritage site and needs too be protected. People randomly walking all over it will degrade the site. Amazing scanner images. Are we even older than we are been lead too believe. The Hydroplate hypothesis of how the great flood happened makes total sense.
Agreed!!
But the Bible says it's on Mount Ararat in Turkey??????
The Bible says the ark landed in the "Mountains (plural) of Ararat" (Genesis 8:4) not "Mount Ararat." This site is in the mountains of Ararat and is 15-20 miles south of the large post flood volcano called Mount Ararat.
What is the outcome??? found any woods??
Excavations have not yet taken place. Last year the pandemic postponed the next phase of the work.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
Are there google earth coords for this site?
goo.gl/maps/TSyWFk9Pq5gKiEMv7
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
I think we met in 2016 or 2017 at the Noah's Park visitor center.
ruclips.net/video/f_PHUjMb7iw/видео.html
The Ark is wedged in a Glacier, at the 14,000 ft. Elevation. Huge timbers are there of Oak , which is called Gopherwood.
The impression on the ground in this video is Not the Ark, but if IT keeps people from climbing up there and to destroy The Real Ark, then I understand why this is the claim.
C. Lambert
Sorry Ararat is a stratovolcano built up after the flood on a plain made of the flood deposits. No ark up there. Just scams.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@DiscoveredMedia
The Ark, is told in the Bible.
It came to Rest on The Mountains of Ararat. It IS there. The Bible is not mistaken.
@@carvinlambert6899 yes the ark is in the mountains of Ararat which include a larger area and is not just one mountain we call today Ararat. The site we are working on is in the mountains of Ararat as the Bible says.
Not the ark. Just fraud seeking money. We know the real ark has been explored and samples taken from it. That shape isn't even what the Bible says it was shaped like.
Where is the country?
Turkey
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@BossHossStudios are u a troll?
So why are there wooden remains on the top of Mt. Ararat? Can you show those as well?
The supposed wooden ark on Ararat discovered in 2009 or 2010 is a fraud and locals will tell you all about how other locals did it. Those that did this fraud made millions off the Chinese Christian group sadly. Ararat is a post flood stratovolcano and the ark did not land there.
@@DiscoveredMedia so it's more of a tourist attraction? Thanks what a shame.
@@DiscoveredMedia and you are certain of this? I have only seen the videos, no real verification talk.
Why couldn't the ark have landed there? It can land on a non active volcano. Are you just saying that it would have been burnt by past eruptions.
@@bloomerb4162 Ararat is built on a flood plain deposit from the global flood. Thus it was formed after the flood. The lava around it was all laid down on land and not underwater too. Thus it was formed not surrounded or under any water but after the flood. So any eruptions that formed this volcano would have destroyed any ark that landed on it if the mountain was even around in some shape or form. Plus all the eyewitness accounts of an "ark" on Ararat conflict with each other. This 2010 ark "discovery" story that the Chinese were promoting the locals again will tell you how their friends helped in getting old wood up there and putting in old food as if Noah left food there or others. Again no credible evidence for that claim.
@@DiscoveredMedia, but doesn't the Bible say the ark came to rest on mount Ararat?
How much would someone have to donate to come to the actual cite there and help with things
The best way is to contact us here: www.discoverednoahsark.com/contact-us/ and we can go over the details.
Genesis 11:2, KJV: "And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there."
Shinar is in modern day Iraq. Turkey is in northwest of Iraq, not in the east of Iraq. Hence the ark didn't land in Turkey. If you want to search for Noah's ark, go to the Himalayas. That is assuming that the ark is still there and not disassembled for its timber.
It looks fantastic there !
WE ALREADY KNOW ITS IT RON WYATT FOUND IT ALONG WITH ARC COVENANT AN JESUS'S BLOOD ETC
Right! So idk why ppl are acting like this is new.
And if you believe that I have some beach front property in the Sahara desert to sell you!
@@eastonvonschist2283 LOL and I have unicorn droppings great for growing everything, better than BS 😂 I can't believe Noah missed the unicorns (bummer) I bet that was the day he was in Australia rounding up Kangaroos , wallabies and duck billed platypus, or maybe he was at one of the poles sexing polar bears or penguins 🐧 . You don't want to get all the way back to Mesopotamia to find out you have 2 male penguins ( just cos it was a bit cold the day you determined their sex)
I might of missed it but how do I go about being a donor?
Hi Ryan, you can join by going to the link in the video description. Here is the link here too: discoveredsinai.com/membership-plans/ blessings!
Wonderful work !!! And which I would love to help support, however I can't get it to work on my phone... ?
by faith ok another way to give is via PayPal at this url. Sorry the website isn’t working. www.paypal.com/paypalme/andrewmjones/
@@byfaith3541 Also if you wish to contact us for another method to donate you can email me at info@discoveredsinai.com
What a organ donor.
Is that the Ararat mount ?
you are doing a super-important work in this so thank you and Godspeed !
The Ark isn't in this spot. The Ark was found on Mount Ararat in Turkey.
I’m deeply interested in your RUclips channel, please don’t think what I’m about to share is intended to be negative or hateful.
I and many others have first hand experience to know that this isn’t the resting site of the great vessel, built by the Biblical character Noah. I used to believe it was until I took part in a UK backed expedition in the early 90’s, to investigate the Ararat Anomaly. I do feel the Ron Wyatt location warrants architectural merit as a site of interest, but it’s not the Ark.
Our brief was given after original satellite images showed a structural anomaly, thought to be the remains of an ancient monastery or man made building. We also had exclusive viewing of short footage taken by the Russian Imperial Army on mount Ararat between 1900 and 1917. It was of poor quality, clearly shot with an early aeroscope camera. It showed the soldiers walking down a huge dark wall that appeared to be made of timber. The soldiers were also firing what appeared to be their berdan rifles into the structure.
Before our UK funded expedition to Turkey, we managed to examine in great detail, the Ararat Anomaly satellite images on an IBM PS computer. It showed an object, or objects located on Ararat at approximately 15000 feet from the the summit. The images showed what appeared to be a linear man made structure that had broken into at least 2 large pieces.
The structure or structures appeared to be joined at some point but had been damaged by the deep glacier it was buried in. The weather was unusually mild for the summer and had resulted in large parts of the object to be exposed. From the evidence we gathered, it had 3 levels with a central atrium running the entire length. The atrium we estimated served no other purpose other than to allow light to reach all the levels. We had no way of estimating the size of the structure given that most of it was under the ice. The material it was constructed from was timber, that had either blackened from age or had some type of coating added. It was felt that the latter applied and this enabled its survival.
Our time at the location was short but was long enough for this object to be documented with hundreds of supporting photographs and camcorder footage. Everyone who witnessed this vast object couldn’t help but be moved with great awe and wonderment.
There was an excavation, or I should say still is ongoing, into the structures you're talking about. It was a Chinese Christian group with some other folks. Look up mt ararat structure here on RUclips. I'll bet it's the same place you're talking about. It's under ice so many thousands of feet up. Has what appeared to be stables and corridors. The outer walls were said to have black coating on them. Throughout history, many different people, some famous, spoke of climbing to the ark. Take care
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
I keep hearing it a natural object that just happens to look like a ship; which is it????
Ron Wyatt
Very Good!
Is there any chambers that can be accessed?
We hope the Turkish government will excavate soon.
@UCSYkSiHPmDMw_-36GnowteQ
I forget if there has been scans around the area of the ark to show the difference?
How long is it actually?
512 ft.
@@voiceofreason162 holy w0t? How old is it? Howd they make such a massive ship with their tech? Thats so cool.
@@76e85 800 years after Adam. 5-ply lamina wood, riveted for strength, 3 decks. There is a full sized replica in Tenessee built as a tourist attraction and education centre. They detail the construction and run courses on flood geology. They really weren't dumb people. At the time of the flood the global population was about the same as ours today. They could move 5000 ton rocks and their knowledge metallurgy can't be replicated even today.
@@76e85 here is the replica ruclips.net/video/PeNOURXWCmM/видео.html the original is in Turkey.
@@voiceofreason162 thats so cool, i didnt think id be so invested on this but my foot's already in the water, imma just dive right in. Thanks for the link and answering my questions!
gad never! You probably meant ELOHIM!! accept no false names for your creator
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
I thank that really is noahs ark from way back then the 8 people that where chosen to repopulate the world through the righteous blood line of noah and his wife and three sons and there wifes. God cleanse the world of sin with the flood to start a new. Even tho the world was still tainted and still in the devils hands just reshuffled. And the world today is like it was maybe BUT with computer technologys and cars and what ever knowledge have brought forth. Hope noahs ark can some day be carefully uncovered and renewed some how. Good luck.
The nephilim where an attack on Christ humanity. If Satan could eliminate pure human beings, then Christ could not be an Adam equivalent.
ruclips.net/video/f_PHUjMb7iw/видео.html
She does look like a grand boat of some kind, but Noah's ship? Didn't that run aground in the mountains of Ararat, why yes it did, NOT Sinai. No idea who this one belonged to, Gilgamesh? Can both stories be true perhaps? Both talking about the same event?
Huh? This is in the mountains of Ararat (mountains of the ancient kingdom of Urartu) in modern day eastern Turkey. This is NOT Mount Sinai in Arabia.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@BossHossStudios u must be a troll.
@@mikeh3005 your mom
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
What is the latest news 🤔
Hi A now where is the Ark Box if you can help me
Not sure what you mean.
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
@@DiscoveredMedia bay bebe
I've always enjoyed those Noah's ark movies; except for John Voights.
LOL agreed. Thought I didn't like the look of the boxy ark and rock monsters in the last major film.
@@DiscoveredMedia
Oh that's right. Don't remember his name. I didn't see that 1.
@@SabbatarianSundayer. I just looked it up. Russell Crowe played Noah and the movie was called Noah.
@@DiscoveredMedia They made Noah look like a jerk. Very depressing movie in my opinion.
@@Sasquatch64 yea Hollywood always gets it wrong with their versions of the Bible stories. 😢
Why support some thing that already has been discovered RON WYATT BEAT YOU TO IT
Yep we are continuing his research including hopefully excavations.
@@DiscoveredMedia then please be respectful and mention that it was Rin Wyatss original discovery and analysis of site in your videos. Otherwise you are misleading people by not stating that you are only continuing and building upon HIS work!!!
@@georgiacollett2235 obviously we are researching the same site he researched in the 1980s. No one here is claiming to have found this nor that we are the first to do research on it. This video update was about the new research we are attempting to do with the Turks not a retelling of the story of the site and how it was found etc. I met Ron twice in high school and college and also talked with him many hours on the phone since I first learned of his work in 1990 while in middle school. Relax.
@@DiscoveredMedia I still think it's only right that he should be mentioned as the founder of the site at the start of your video. Many will not have seen your previous videos, like myself and will assume it as your discovery or have no knowledge of Ron Wyatts work.
@@georgiacollett2235 we can’t do the work for people who don’t look up our stuff based on one video. 🤣 if someone wants to think that then that’s their fault. But definitely our motives is not to steal anyone’s credit. 👍🙏
Boy!
This is really CONFUSING!
What about that other, much more famous ship three quarters covered with ice and snow? The one the CIA took aerial photos of???
The one folks have been visiting and writing about for nearly 3000 years! Have you not looked at THAT one??
No ship up there. Just a fake site the locals will tell you about how other locals brought wood up there to make money off tourists sadly.
Is research still continuing with covid going on?
Yes but in the planning stages. More to announce about the 2021 plans soon. Watch this channel for more updates.
Todo el que vea este comentario que cree en el señor Jesucristo diga en voz alta jesus te recibo como mi señor y mi salvador unico amen os aseguro que os ira bien amen probad hacerla y vivireis amén
I lucky that I seen that place.because I read the story of Nuha allihissslam in Holy QURAN.
This is it. It is less than a mile to the house that Noah built with rocks and wood. And the house is near the unhumed alter that Noah and his son made the same day they disembarked from the Ark. Noah sacrificed the extra lambs, bulls and goats theu.took aboard the ark to thank God.
ruclips.net/video/f_PHUjMb7iw/видео.html
Not the ark
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
A+++ 👍🙌🙌👍🎖👍🎖 🇨🇱AustinTX.... Liam Donaldssen McIntyre,Jr...”Mr Don”
Sorry. But I haven't seen enough proof to confirm this location. It looks to me like an eroded hill that is very similar to other landscape in the area. If it is truly a possibility, then do a grid style excavation of a segment of the outer wall and confirm it with samples of buried or petrified wood. Maybe even some types of fasteners or tools made of bronze. Until then, you're just looking silly.
MP this was already done in the 70s with ron wyatt. There's a video documentary where they pulled the petrified wood, used metal detectors which detected consecutive patterns, anchor stones, etc. And just recently with new 3d technology it is confirmed to be a ship. So we have the evidence
Ron Wyatt was a huckster. He also claimed to have found Noah's Ark, Sodom and Gomorrah, Mt. Sinai, the remains of Pharoah's army at the bottom of the Red Sea, the Ark of the Covenant, the Ten Commandment stones and much more. Many of his claims have been proven by Christian archeologists as FLAT OUT LIES. Ron Wyatt did more damage to Christian archeology than anyone in history. I have read his books and the claims he made are just complete lies.
ruclips.net/video/f_PHUjMb7iw/видео.html
@@rickd1412 Ron Wyatt wasn't the 1st to discover the Ark, it was the Turkish military. They couldn't excavate it at that time. Ron Wyatt came across the information and revisited it. Also he had multiple experts in different fields of knowledge involved. It would be one thing if it was just him alone but it wasn't
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
Do you have a link for donations
Hi you can donate via one of our websites. www.discoverednoahsark.com/donate or if you wish to use PayPal let us know.
Check out Ron Wyatt. He originally found the arc and has a lot of research and irrefutable evidence.
He has been refuted on everything he has thought he has found!
ruclips.net/video/f_PHUjMb7iw/видео.html
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
The measurement of the that ark was totally wrong and there was some steel materials used on that ark and that time steel was not yet discovered. Mount Ararat is not the highest mountain in the world and it was short of 12,000 ft. to Mount Everest. GOD BLESS.
This looks way wider than 50 cubits wide??
Yes it's splayed (decayed out) in the middle (138 feet).
Not everyone is a Speed Reader so please slow down. So I am not getting bits and peace’s.
👍👍
The biblical account for Noah’s ark is an elongated rectangle. Not a ship. The work Ark means a Box in Hebrew. You can delete my comment like you deleted my other. But know that you are stopping any critical thinking. The word Urat was from the Hebrew word for the nation of Armenia. The word Urat was not a place but a nation. The mountains of Urat (Armenia).
AMAZING!!! To see that the first built Ship in the world - built by giants, had as it's designer the Master Architect...God Himself. WOW!! Unbelievable!
@@8ColousBIT I'm always open to proper information or knowledge. So please inform me about any manmade ship(s) prior to the one built by Noah. I'll patiently wait for your reply.
@@8ColousBIT I really do appreciate your response. We may not really differ as it may have seem after all. Let me put it this way. But before I say anything else, I would like to make it clear that it is only speculation on my part. I don't believe that the Bible goes into details or is it specific on a lot of things. Therefore I believe that this discussion concerning ships or boats that may or may not have existed before the great flood is not important salvation wise. It is one of the reasons why I believe God saw fit to exclude certain topics from the Bible. God's main focus is on saving us, not satisfying our curiosity.
My opinion may be a minority opinion, but I have thought about these things a lot, and have done quite a bit of research due to my own curiosity.
The Bible makes it clear that before the great global flood the earth spoke one language. The earth I could also assume had basically one climate - or perhaps it didn't fluctuate from one extreme to another extreme. Now taking these few details into consideration, I therefore assume that there would have been one race of people. I hold that position because I know that the climate on a global scale changed drastically after the flood. Places that never experienced the presence of snow and ice, was now buried in it. Places that were once lush and green and fertile, are now barren and dry. When God confounded the language of mankind during the tower of Babel, civilization was splintered, and scattered out to the four corners of the earth. God placed in all living things the ability to cope and change with the environment - which brought about the different races of men.
Now let me return back to the time before the great flood. Since the world population at that time spoke a single language - also consisted of only one race - the youthful earth having an ideal environment, humanity practically lived lives of seeming pleasure. There harbour no need to spread out across the globe. Why risk one's life and venture into the unknown verdant forests full of strange and frightening beasts and huge reptiles. In my opinion I feel that humanity did not venture far from where God first created the first human pair. Think of it - it was the location of Paradise - the Garden of Eden, a place of perfection. The Bible claims that it never rained prior to the flood, but the earth was watered by a mist which rises up in the evening and water the whole surface of the earth. Why would anyone want to build a ship in such a perfect environment - and then go where? To another forested unknown region harbouring huge gigantic frightful animals? It would have feel much safer remaining with your other human companions - there is strength in unity. It is not to say that smaller boats were not built to traverse streams and rivers...but why build a ship?
When Noah began to preach about the coming global cataclysm, he need not have ventured far.
The Bible said that when Cain fled from the presence of God, he established himself in the land of Nod. Apparently the land of Nod must not have been too far from where the worshipers of God, or Seth's offspring (the Godly or those that retain their loyalty to God) resided. They remained near the vicinity of the Gates of Eden.
Noah's Ark was a spectacle to the world in those days.The question was why would a man build such a huge ship in such a perfect environment, and away from any large body of water? The only conclusion was that he must be crazy. So ironically he drew the crowds, which allowed him to warn the world of his day of the coming destruction of the earth.
@@8ColousBIT I do not disagree that the pre-flood civilization was very advanced. Because it wasn't too long after the fall of man that inventions began to take place. For example the descendants of Cain invented certain musical instruments, and developed metallurgy etc. Many asian countries like Japan for example retain certain knowledge about wood joinery which has been almost lost to western countries. They can actually build a structure without nails or dowels.
You mentioned about carbon dating etc, and why you believe that the evidence shows that humanity can be dated back to over 200,000 years.
I have serious issues with carbon dating, and that humanity goes back hundreds of thousands of years. Allow me to give a few examples why I do not subscribe to these long ages of time.
Let us say that on the day that God created man, and then was examined by a doctor who had time traveled back to the past, (this is a hypothetical example). The doctor looked him over and medically examined him, all the while not knowing anything about God's creative power. The doctor's report would read that Adam is a man about 25 to 30 years old and in perfect health. No matter how sincere the doctor would feel about his report, he would be nonetheless sincerely wrong. The doctor did not take into consideration the creative power of God. Adam would tell the doctor that he haven't even been alive for a week as yet, but that he's just only a day old. The doctor would say that his carbon dating shows that the man is at least 25 yrs old. But he would be wrong. So things may appear to be of great ages, but that may not necessarily be the case.
Another example is that basically nearly all ancient civilizations can be dated back to between 4,000 to 7,000 years ago. The invention of writing also dates to that time period more or less.
I believe the scattered remains of human bones found around the world that scientists claim to be over 200,000 years are actually post flood remains. Which interestingly would make them 5,000 to 4,000 years old. Far younger than the great ages that today's scientists attach to them. I believe that they are misreading the fossil record.
You mentioned about the huge mega monuments, and enormous blocks of stone, obviously worked by human hands. Again, due to my research, I conclude that most, if not all of these are probably post flood constructions.
Like I mentioned earlier, I believe that after the fall of man (approximately 6,000 years ago), humanity remained concentrated in a specific area in the Middle East region - perhaps the region of southern Iraq and the Persian Gulf area. So far I do not believe any preflood human remains have been discovered as yet. (If they have been discovered, then they may have been kept secret from the public).
The reason I give for them not being discovered, is that God totally buried them under the waters of the Persian Gulf. According to the Bible humans were created as giants in the beginning just as the animals were created as giants. As soon as men left the Ark, their longevity began to decrease as well as their stature. It is only logical to assume that if nearly all fossils of animals were huge sizes, humans most certainly must also have been of giant size. It would be unsual for God to pay a visit to an adverage height Adam of just 5' 7" tall, while the height of God would be about 18 feet tall - and all the animals around of gigantic proportions. If Og king of Bashan was at least 13 to 14 feet tall, then I'm sure God must have been taller, and so was Adam, for all humanity descended from Adam and Eve. Any other view would not be supported by the Bible.
Those descendants of Noah which left the Ark, I believe are responsible for the huge monumental structures found around the world. The giants of antiquity were our ancestors, and the descendants of Noah and his three sons, Shem, Japheth and Ham - all being giant in statue. But as time went on everything, including man decreased in size to what it is today.
@@8ColousBIT you have stated some interesting and informative points which is worth contemplating. But archaeological discoveries, and other scientific evidence which I have examined tend to support the accuracy of of the Bible.
Scientific theories are constantly being changed and revised. Most of the theories pertaining to ancient man - geology, astronomy quantum physics etc. are constantly being changed and or discarded as being unworkable. For example Darwin's book on the origin of species. The book is so out dated I doubt that it's even used in the schools. But of course he is considered the father the scientific principle of the evolutionary theory - a foundation upon which modern science rest. A flimsy foundation indeed, because most of what Darwin considered to be the workings of evolution, is in fact adaptation - or change occurring within a species. No jump from a dog to a cat. Dogs remained dogs from the beginning of time until today, same as every other species. The only difference is that there may be variations in the species, but no jump from one species to another. Even though that is what is proposed as scientific fact.
The difference is that God's Word is dependable, trustworthy and unchanging. Psalm 119:105 states, "Thy Word is a Lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.
How can I not believe and accept those trustworthy words, when the very One that I refer to as my Lord and God also was sustained by those Words. The servant is not greater than the Master. If the Master upholds the servant complies. Jesus took the story of Noah and the rest of Genesis as a literal events. And I concur wholeheartedly.
Yes I have read that some of the ancient writers downplayed the fact that Goliath was as large as stated in scripture. My response to that is that they then have a lot of explaining to do. If I'm not mistaken, Goliath's coat of mail would just be to heavy for any ordinary man, except he was of a huge statue. His spear the Bible claims was like a weavers beam. A spear fit for a giant.
To understand how chemistry works, there are certain formulas and rules which must be applied. The same as with Physics and Mathematics. The Bible is govern by similar principles. The Bible is not a book Shakespeare that one picks up and expect grasp it's meaning. One must lay aside their ego. They must leave all their baggage behind, and change their mode of thinking. The natural man must have a change of mindset from the natural to the spiritual. God is the law-Maker. He has created the natural laws to govern nature. But there are times He chooses to override natural law. For to comprehend God one must become spiritual minded. For the natural mind cannot grasp the things of the Bible, because he's using the wrong formula. He must be spiritual minded to understand biblical truths.
No, Noah's Ark was not the first vessel, but the largest wooden vessel up to date, and it wasn't built by giants, nowhere on the Bible implies Noah and his family were giants, and yes, God designed the Ark, and designed it good.
Amen! 🙏 God Bless You All! Finally the Bible story in Genesis unearthed! To God Be the Glory!
Ive been following this site for 20 years. You can CLEARLY see the outline of a huge vessel.
Yeah, except the ark was box shaped. This is a scam. However, the real ark has been explored and samples taken from it, higher up the mountain. We know that Noah lived at the base of the mountain. We know there are many artifacts from the ark, still in the area. I believe this is a building that was built after the flood, not the ark itself.. the shape is all wrong.
@@KBS117 but what about the whole thing that the government of Turkey declared it being the ark?
Where is the music from?
www.musicbed.com/songs/the-way-home/24191
@@DiscoveredMedia thx!
People need to give credit to RON WYATT.
Yep we are continuing the research he started in the 1980s-1990s.
I just found you and Ron a couple months ago...I’m so thankful for your work. Are you still working this project and collecting funds?
Genesis 11:2, KJV: "And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there."
Shinar is in modern day Iraq. Turkey is in northwest of Iraq, not in the east of Iraq. Hence the ark didn't land in Turkey.
I could watch these videos all day long!
How About Coming Up The Mountain Some; And Do Your Radar Imaging On My ''Real'' Noah's Ark'' Site.
No, that's MY ark!
Don't think that ron got this right at all just look at the direction each son went vs how they have laid out the sons land. I think it was much further at least thousand miles from that area is where the ark landed.
Amen and Praise the Lord. God Bless you and be with you all for all you do.
While I hope this is the resting place of The Ark I just don't see how it could be. The Ark would have to been massive to contain all the animals and this doesn't look as though it would be big enough.
I do welcome correction though.
Well it is the Biblical length given in Genesis (aka 300 cubits). We believe Moses wrote the book of Genesis and would have used the known measurement of the day which was the royal Egyptian cubit. That would place the ark at around 515 feet or so in length which is exactly what this site is.
🤘🥰🤘
Noah’s ark is going to be disappear some thing I don’t understand why they don’t protect it ??? Or build something on top to protect whatever is left otherwise few years from now it’s not gonna be there
Just thing NOAH most likely used the wood from his boat to build a roof for the house he built
Most likely not as ancient historians wrote about people visiting the ark remains up through the time of Christ so the ark wasn’t totally dismantled and it was big vessel.
ruclips.net/video/f_PHUjMb7iw/видео.html
@@BossHossStudios he makes some good points on why the ark didn’t land high up on the volcano Ararat.