I love seeing how you played against the 3000+ bot too, that's really educational, see how it keeps its pieces centralized and always has extremely flexible pieces and everything is well defended? Even if king is still in the center. We can learn a lot from it, especially about defense.
Yes maybe taking the approach of learning from it instead of trying to beat it is the right way Honestly I was feeling so whupped that I'm not even sure what happened 😆 it just feels like whatever u do ur screwed. Normally I don't care to play bots so much but I'll give the higher ones a go like u suggest
Yes maybe taking the approach of learning from it instead of trying to beat it is the right way Honestly I was feeling so whupped that I'm not even sure what happened 😆 it just feels like whatever u do ur screwed. Normally I don't care to play bots so much but I'll give the higher ones a go like u suggest
Great job, great review. I'm especially proud that you looked at your 2000-bot-opponent not defending properly. I was shouting out to myself IT MISSED f6/f5! during the game (I just knew f pawn would need to move, didn't really look at f5, because same thing as f6 kinda with an en-passant possibility there) , Nice job!!
I recommend 2200-2400 level bots for you. They are around the perfect difficulty for improvement (based on how you played), not impossible for you, and they don't usually have bad habits like some 2000 bots, but sometimes have interesting openings or ways to defend (not near as creative as the 3000+ though lol). I only won half of the time when I tried few years ago against that range so they are competitive for 2000+ players too. 2500-2700 are painful and I lose way more than I win. Generally it's good to sometimes train with something 300-500 points stronger than you. I can understand why you didn't want to continue with the 3000 bot lol , same here xD
Nice top & is that a wine bottle in the back…& why isn’t it finished? GGs.
Lol not mine
I love seeing how you played against the 3000+ bot too, that's really educational, see how it keeps its pieces centralized and always has extremely flexible pieces and everything is well defended? Even if king is still in the center. We can learn a lot from it, especially about defense.
Yes maybe taking the approach of learning from it instead of trying to beat it is the right way
Honestly I was feeling so whupped that I'm not even sure what happened 😆 it just feels like whatever u do ur screwed.
Normally I don't care to play bots so much but I'll give the higher ones a go like u suggest
Yes maybe taking the approach of learning from it instead of trying to beat it is the right way
Honestly I was feeling so whupped that I'm not even sure what happened 😆 it just feels like whatever u do ur screwed.
Normally I don't care to play bots so much but I'll give the higher ones a go like u suggest
Great job, great review. I'm especially proud that you looked at your 2000-bot-opponent not defending properly. I was shouting out to myself IT MISSED f6/f5! during the game (I just knew f pawn would need to move, didn't really look at f5, because same thing as f6 kinda with an en-passant possibility there) , Nice job!!
Haha he had to create the passant possibility cuz he's prof passant
❤
Using that furry thing helps alot
I recommend you to enlarge the chess board and make your camera smaller
guh
Heyy, lets play 1 game?
Can we schedule a time?
I recommend 2200-2400 level bots for you. They are around the perfect difficulty for improvement (based on how you played), not impossible for you, and they don't usually have bad habits like some 2000 bots, but sometimes have interesting openings or ways to defend (not near as creative as the 3000+ though lol). I only won half of the time when I tried few years ago against that range so they are competitive for 2000+ players too. 2500-2700 are painful and I lose way more than I win. Generally it's good to sometimes train with something 300-500 points stronger than you. I can understand why you didn't want to continue with the 3000 bot lol , same here xD