"My Asthma has got worst since living in that flat" - but she's been in the flat for 45 years!!! It's not like she moved in 2 years ago and suddenly got Asthma. I simply don't believe she can't sell a LONDON flat just because of pollution - pobably just the prise is way too high! :D
Wow how crap is this discussion , im asthmatic probably due to walking to school in the 70s, yet if a ulez came to my city id be housebound! Im disabled and public transport isnt an option nor would getting a compliant car it wouldnt be financially doable under Khans rules. Her use of stats is as bad as Khans to and this is what gets people angry the manipulation of the narrative
Totally agree! Coming up on my 50th and been asthmatic since before I can remember, The air is cleaner than its ever been but the UK is such a minuscule percentage of the world when it comes to pollution. What we do is pissing into the wind as far as global problems are concerned!
A 73 year old "asthmatic" who has no trouble drawing breath to proclaim difficulty selling a house (read not getting what she wants) in North London and bellows like a Bull when she wants to. Even the UK pollution of the steam age required a still and stable air mass to hold the pollution close to the ground and prevent the prevailing Atlantic winds scrubbing the air clean in a couple of days. Pity we cannot dump her in 1990s Souel for a week to show her how well off she is. I fear I am asking to much but I would love to hear her reason justification of just one of her independent off the cuff claims. Sympathy for those displaying symptoms of asthma is one thing but telling the rest of us to get out of the way because I have been diagnosed as asthmatic sounds more like aggresive beggar patter. I got out of the south where I was brought up because the land has changed beyond recognition not because the mobile air mass is a threat.
it really isnt, and you need to learn to spell complying not complaining@@90kaste this will push so many people into poverty and the pollution isnt impacted positively by this in any way beyond insignificant values
People are talking like it’s all cars! If you go out and count how many cars are older than 2006 it’s in a minority and to buy a car of that age is about £2k unless you want a big SUV. I think it’s fair.
Wrong! Its diesel vehicles older than 2017 which includes vans and there's practically no such thing as a petrol van. Many of those vans and diesel cars are worth well over £15000. Who drives vans? Therefore by default it affects the working man. Go look at actual data instead of talking off the top of your head. In some boroughs within the scheme it affects 40% of vehicles. On top of that when you force thousands of people to scrap perfect good vehicles that have long since paid their environmental production cost you create a chain for the the purchase of a new vehicle at the top of that purchase chain which will use fossil fuels and plastics to produce, and those cars are NOT going to be electric cars because the cost is way too prohibitive so now you have more internal combustion cars on the road for even longer. Also if you think this scheme is going to stop at "older cars" just wait as they constantly move the bar and it will be your car next. Why cant people like you ask simple questions like "if it just affects a few older cars why would they go to the bother of installing a massive camera system over every square metre of greater London and many other cities in the UK". Just to have them up for three years and then take them down? Do you really think the camera charging and surveillance scheme is coming down whilst the whole of the political class wont shut up about "Net Zero" and the constant false end of the world scenario. people like you are the real problem, who have zero critical reasoning skills, zero information, zero capacity to question things yet you will go around calling people conspiracy theorists who have looked at all of the information as if that is the foolish thing to do. Go on, say it...."you are not a scientist". Boring, pathetic and juvenile responses like that are just laughable.
Rubbish from Mike Perry and usual… it’s the definition of stronger with the weak and weak with the powerful… This is how you should divide who’s fair and who’s there for interest (Mike Perry)
She should off moved years ago
Yasmin has got a brain worm !
She is the intelligent one, it is the idiotic Mike Parry is the one who has had a frontal labotomy
She's insufferable 🤮
"My Asthma has got worst since living in that flat" - but she's been in the flat for 45 years!!! It's not like she moved in 2 years ago and suddenly got Asthma. I simply don't believe she can't sell a LONDON flat just because of pollution - pobably just the prise is way too high! :D
Spot on!she piles it on thick with her moaning 🤮
I believe she is a millionaire?
Wow how crap is this discussion , im asthmatic probably due to walking to school in the 70s, yet if a ulez came to my city id be housebound! Im disabled and public transport isnt an option nor would getting a compliant car it wouldnt be financially doable under Khans rules. Her use of stats is as bad as Khans to and this is what gets people angry the manipulation of the narrative
Totally agree! Coming up on my 50th and been asthmatic since before I can remember, The air is cleaner than its ever been but the UK is such a minuscule percentage of the world when it comes to pollution. What we do is pissing into the wind as far as global problems are concerned!
A 73 year old "asthmatic" who has no trouble drawing breath to proclaim difficulty selling a house (read not getting what she wants) in North London and bellows like a Bull when she wants to. Even the UK pollution of the steam age required a still and stable air mass to hold the pollution close to the ground and prevent the prevailing Atlantic winds scrubbing the air clean in a couple of days. Pity we cannot dump her in 1990s Souel for a week to show her how well off she is. I fear I am asking to much but I would love to hear her reason justification of just one of her independent off the cuff claims. Sympathy for those displaying symptoms of asthma is one thing but telling the rest of us to get out of the way because I have been diagnosed as asthmatic sounds more like aggresive beggar patter. I got out of the south where I was brought up because the land has changed beyond recognition not because the mobile air mass is a threat.
The woman is an idiot! If she thinks that ULEZ is going to help her sell her house then she is SORELY mistaken!!
Exactly how many drivers does this effect?! We never hear a percentage.
Around 10% as 90% of the car are complaining with the rules, so all this is simply hysteria nothing else
it really isnt, and you need to learn to spell complying not complaining@@90kaste
this will push so many people into poverty and the pollution isnt impacted positively by this in any way beyond insignificant values
Yasmine knows mike is right she dont want to listen.
Jeremy Vile pond life
Why don’t she bloody move
She's just a misery guts 😂
"It'll be a wasteland!" has to be the most absurd comment on the whole subject. What a bloody lie!
Don't say we didn't tell you!
She can always move out of london it is a free country apart from in london
Trust her to side with khan!!!!!
I can't watch this show when Mike is on it. He's so sensationalist, it's like he's programmed only to scaremonger and whip up hatred.
The unbelievable selfishness of asthmatics, children, scooters, cyclist's and pedestrians in not putting the motorist first.
So Mike's worried about the economy , what a hypocrit
0:55 mick is good
Maybe pressure the tory government to increase funding to those in the home counties who will not benefit from Khans scrappage scheme.
People are talking like it’s all cars! If you go out and count how many cars are older than 2006 it’s in a minority and to buy a car of that age is about £2k unless you want a big SUV. I think it’s fair.
Wrong! Its diesel vehicles older than 2017 which includes vans and there's practically no such thing as a petrol van. Many of those vans and diesel cars are worth well over £15000. Who drives vans? Therefore by default it affects the working man. Go look at actual data instead of talking off the top of your head. In some boroughs within the scheme it affects 40% of vehicles. On top of that when you force thousands of people to scrap perfect good vehicles that have long since paid their environmental production cost you create a chain for the the purchase of a new vehicle at the top of that purchase chain which will use fossil fuels and plastics to produce, and those cars are NOT going to be electric cars because the cost is way too prohibitive so now you have more internal combustion cars on the road for even longer. Also if you think this scheme is going to stop at "older cars" just wait as they constantly move the bar and it will be your car next. Why cant people like you ask simple questions like "if it just affects a few older cars why would they go to the bother of installing a massive camera system over every square metre of greater London and many other cities in the UK". Just to have them up for three years and then take them down? Do you really think the camera charging and surveillance scheme is coming down whilst the whole of the political class wont shut up about "Net Zero" and the constant false end of the world scenario. people like you are the real problem, who have zero critical reasoning skills, zero information, zero capacity to question things yet you will go around calling people conspiracy theorists who have looked at all of the information as if that is the foolish thing to do. Go on, say it...."you are not a scientist". Boring, pathetic and juvenile responses like that are just laughable.
Rubbish from Mike Perry and usual… it’s the definition of stronger with the weak and weak with the powerful…
This is how you should divide who’s fair and who’s there for interest (Mike Perry)
Cant stand this bias crap
A bit here she owns a cat that's why she's asthmatic
😔😔
Awful debate. Shouting at each other.
That woman is a FRUITCAKE