I have the Century 2001 with 35000 miles on it. I love it. Am the second owner. An play CD and Cassette player working Perfectly fine. You may not believe battery is original too.
This car was a hidden gem. I test drove a medium blue base model 2000 LeSabre that was fully loaded with moonroof, several option packages and the touring suspension pkg and bought the car on the spot. And that was when I was only 33 years old! It even had the trunk mounted 12 disk CD changer! That car rode amazing yet handled the curves well and the 3800 tied to the performance 3.05 optional gearing made it very lively yet it still managed 30 plus highway MPG! Tie all this with nice looks, a large trunk with low lift height and you have a car that Buick is incapable of making today. The current Lacrosse doesn't even come close in many ways with it's tiny trunk, narrow body, poor visibility and lower fuel economy when V6 models are compared. Yes Buick and GM lost a great car when the LeSabre was dropped.
The Vanilla family & their neighbor's the white-breads. They all just got back from the High School football game, lunch at friendly's and a trip to the local Sears. They made it home in time to catch 60 mins.
8th gen LeSabre's- good cars. Suspension much better than 7th gen Dynaride. Had a '99 that was wrecked and settled for an '01 replacement. Would still like to pick up a good 7th gen if I could find one in good shape. My '01 is now my daily driver, replacing my '07 Camry, which I still have and respect as a better car, but I prefer Buicks.
Im 21 with a 2000 lesabre its gold with 136k miles I got it with 125k for $4k great paint condition and body condition a few scratches but that isnt gonna stop it from driving and its a baby park ave
I was wanting to like this new Lesabre so much more than I did. The 00 to 05 models were so much bigger on the outside and smaller on the inside than the 92-99 models. The backseat especially. It was terribly cramped. I had a 93 I was going to replace with a 2000. I remember having an argument with a salesman about size, so I pulled my car right up to the 2000 I was considering and showed the skeptical dealer (who said, no, they’re exactly the same size inside and out) and he couldn’t believe it either. The longer hood and longer trunk of the of the 2000 ate away the interior space. The 92-99 had a shorter hood and smaller trunk which gave tons of interior room. This was a bad move on GM’s part. They gave it large car proportions on the exterior and midsize car proportions on the interior. The roominess of the outgoing models was the whole reason I was considering a Lesabre again and instead moved up to a Park Avenue to get the same level of spaciousness as the outgoing Lesabre. I also remember thinking the materials quality inside the car seemed cheaper. Low quality leather and plastics.
@@generaloranger6150 I’m replying to this message while sitting in the very 2000 Park Avenue Ultra that I chose over the Lesabre Limited when I traded in my 1993. Still running strong and looking beautiful even after 23 years. For what it’s worth, I agree and even my 2000 Ultra is cheaped out with more plastic than the 1993 Lesabre I replaced. That’s where GM went to hell. Plastic and cost cutting. No more sedans. No more of the traditional vehicles the buyers all loved. It’s why I’m still driving this car after 23 years. I love it, but hate new cars now and would never buy a new Buick today. I digress; bottom line, and cheapness aside, I think the biggest mistake for the 2000 model year was taking the perfectly fine LeSabre model that everyone loved, making it bigger on the outside, smaller on the inside and telling people “no change, nothing to see here“ Side note. I should probably make RUclips vids of my 2000 Ultra as the original owner, ie “this is what the old Buicks could do…withstand the test of time.”
The 1991 Park Ave was a great moment in auto styling and engineering and the rest of the Buick line, especially the LaSabre from 92 on benefited. Some of the handsomest cars since about 1970 or 72. The second gen park Aves and eight gen LaSabres are quite attractive, but I still like the first and seventh gen, respectively, better. Have an 01 LaSabre and 94 Park Ave. Like the LaSabre, love the Park Ave.
I'm 24 but I love buicks. Best cars for long drives
Im18
I'm 18
I have the Century 2001 with 35000 miles on it. I love it. Am the second owner. An play CD and Cassette player working
Perfectly fine. You may not believe battery is original too.
This car was a hidden gem. I test drove a medium blue base model 2000 LeSabre that was fully loaded with moonroof, several option packages and the touring suspension pkg and bought the car on the spot. And that was when I was only 33 years old! It even had the trunk mounted 12 disk CD changer! That car rode amazing yet handled the curves well and the 3800 tied to the performance 3.05 optional gearing made it very lively yet it still managed 30 plus highway MPG! Tie all this with nice looks, a large trunk with low lift height and you have a car that Buick is incapable of making today. The current Lacrosse doesn't even come close in many ways with it's tiny trunk, narrow body, poor visibility and lower fuel economy when V6 models are compared. Yes Buick and GM lost a great car when the LeSabre was dropped.
Agreed
The doggo running in the beginning ❤❤❤❤
The Vanilla family & their neighbor's the white-breads. They all just got back from the High School football game, lunch at friendly's and a trip to the local Sears. They made it home in time to catch 60 mins.
So many old people, I swear I thought I saw my grandma in this video
I'm 18
8th gen LeSabre's- good cars. Suspension much better than 7th gen Dynaride. Had a '99 that was wrecked and settled for an '01 replacement. Would still like to pick up a good 7th gen if I could find one in good shape. My '01 is now my daily driver, replacing my '07 Camry, which I still have and respect as a better car, but I prefer Buicks.
Im 21 with a 2000 lesabre its gold with 136k miles I got it with 125k for $4k great paint condition and body condition a few scratches but that isnt gonna stop it from driving and its a baby park ave
I wish I realized how great these cars were at your age. I'm impressed. I was much older till I realized how awesome these cars are.
That's how you play football
Whats the dog got to do with the car?
I was wanting to like this new Lesabre so much more than I did. The 00 to 05 models were so much bigger on the outside and smaller on the inside than the 92-99 models. The backseat especially. It was terribly cramped. I had a 93 I was going to replace with a 2000. I remember having an argument with a salesman about size, so I pulled my car right up to the 2000 I was considering and showed the skeptical dealer (who said, no, they’re exactly the same size inside and out) and he couldn’t believe it either. The longer hood and longer trunk of the of the 2000 ate away the interior space. The 92-99 had a shorter hood and smaller trunk which gave tons of interior room. This was a bad move on GM’s part. They gave it large car proportions on the exterior and midsize car proportions on the interior. The roominess of the outgoing models was the whole reason I was considering a Lesabre again and instead moved up to a Park Avenue to get the same level of spaciousness as the outgoing Lesabre. I also remember thinking the materials quality inside the car seemed cheaper. Low quality leather and plastics.
park ave has more room
GM cheaped out on a lot of things post 2000. They even cut standard ABS on 2003-2004.
@@generaloranger6150 I’m replying to this message while sitting in the very 2000 Park Avenue Ultra that I chose over the Lesabre Limited when I traded in my 1993. Still running strong and looking beautiful even after 23 years. For what it’s worth, I agree and even my 2000 Ultra is cheaped out with more plastic than the 1993 Lesabre I replaced. That’s where GM went to hell. Plastic and cost cutting. No more sedans. No more of the traditional vehicles the buyers all loved. It’s why I’m still driving this car after 23 years. I love it, but hate new cars now and would never buy a new Buick today. I digress; bottom line, and cheapness aside, I think the biggest mistake for the 2000 model year was taking the perfectly fine LeSabre model that everyone loved, making it bigger on the outside, smaller on the inside and telling people “no change, nothing to see here“
Side note. I should probably make RUclips vids of my 2000 Ultra as the original owner, ie “this is what the old Buicks could do…withstand the test of time.”
17 I like Buick Cadillac mustang
This is the whitest Ad I have ever seen
hell yeah but, that's not bad lol
That's hilarious!
8:14 tesla stole his idea
i like the look of the 1992-1996 & 1997-1999 better however i do think the 1988-1991 are very ugly
themamagoatshow These models mimic the look of the Park Avenue, yet are distinctive in their own right.
The 1991 Park Ave was a great moment in auto styling and engineering and the rest of the Buick line, especially the LaSabre from 92 on benefited. Some of the handsomest cars since about 1970 or 72. The second gen park Aves and eight gen LaSabres are quite attractive, but I still like the first and seventh gen, respectively, better. Have an 01 LaSabre and 94 Park Ave. Like the LaSabre, love the Park Ave.
A chevy impala