Siskel & Ebert Classics - 1991 Holiday Video Gift Guide

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 33

  • @zxbc1
    @zxbc1 2 года назад +17

    "Nice sized screen... you know, 25 inches." I still remember the 21 inch Sony TV that my family watched for 15 years. It's such nostalgia listening to Danny Devito.

    • @jeffcarlin5866
      @jeffcarlin5866 Год назад

      I will stop complaining about my 43", my 55", and my 65" T.V.s forthwith.

  • @DeformedConscience
    @DeformedConscience Год назад +8

    55:59 - Siskel and Ebert play Super Nintendo

  • @themadwomanskitchen9732
    @themadwomanskitchen9732 Год назад +4

    Interesting watching this interview of Danny DeVito knowing that in the coming decades DVDs would take over VHS.

  • @redandbluebulldog1508
    @redandbluebulldog1508 2 года назад +9

    Wow. Thirty years ago. Doesn’t seem like it, and I feel old for saying that, and I don’t feel old normally. I would’ve been a freshman at university at this time. Love S&E, but I don’t remember these holiday episodes, and now I think I know why. I was in college and hardly watched any tv that whole time.

  • @mikejna
    @mikejna 2 года назад +18

    VCR Plus?! I need to look into this exciting new technology.

  • @bijibadness
    @bijibadness Год назад +3

    11:18 watching those olds ads I really realized something that I never thought about -- ads used to _talk_ to us. they used to actually _say_ things. whole sentences, ideas, relatively complicated concepts like a United States Marines [?] Gift Drive. the whole ad's a spiel.
    not a GOOD spiel, and I'd say 98% of all those old talky ads are either filled with lies or ridiculous corniness, but still IDEAS.
    at the time this was taped I guess it was still 1991. and I'd say by about 1995 ads had settled into either marketing slogans or screaming things at you.
    ads -- with _Attitude._
    I 'member the '90s. I 'member.

  • @WillCWilson
    @WillCWilson 2 года назад +6

    48:42 Siskel and Ebert talk about Barney the Dinosaur

    • @babyitsnatural
      @babyitsnatural 11 месяцев назад

      Barney is so fucking weird

    • @supermariof0521
      @supermariof0521 2 месяца назад

      I wonder if they reviewed "Barney's Great Adventure: The Movie".

  • @RemoGutierrez1
    @RemoGutierrez1 9 месяцев назад +2

    Nobody really used laserdiscs. Born in 78'. I never saw any

  • @tf692
    @tf692 2 года назад +3

    LOVE THIS! Thank you so much!

  • @bucksdiaryfan
    @bucksdiaryfan 7 месяцев назад

    Siskel and Ebert are the ones who turned me on to "widescreen" viewing, and after their special on the topic (not this one) every one of my next movie purchases were widescreen... its a HUGE difference that I was ingnorant of... now that TV is mostly shot in widescreen, TVs are manufactured for widescreen, the issue is no longer really relevant -- I haven't seen a pan/scan butchery in quite some time

  • @eggsandbacon6038
    @eggsandbacon6038 Год назад +8

    Man I feel like an old piece of shit

    • @thekingofmovies193
      @thekingofmovies193 3 месяца назад

      Don't discredit yourself. Just be glad that you got to be around during all of those fine decades when times were still good (or ar least better than they were).

  • @Jeffdraws101
    @Jeffdraws101 Год назад +3

    Aww look at little 28 year old Jodie Foster.

  • @bijibadness
    @bijibadness Год назад +4

    ohhhh wow. that's awesome.
    Gene Siskel _shaming_ Roger Ebert for being adept and enthusiastic about computers.
    what a world we live in.
    there was a time, kids (not TOO long ago), when being at all interested in computers was hopelessly shameful for kids growing up. or video games. if you weren't into sports, you were a loser.
    maybe it's not so different these days - how would I know? - but you're not going to find many Gen Z babies making fun of anyone for spending too much time on their computer.
    I think we've all sort of become remotely bionic people. we live on our computers. sad? I dunno. maybe.

  • @tfronauer
    @tfronauer 2 года назад +6

    Michael Caine seems heavily sedated

  • @benkline8996
    @benkline8996 Год назад +2

    This is a nice piece of laserdisc 📀 history on this show 🎬 but when Danny DeVito was talking about getting a nice size TV screen I would think he would have said at least 32-in screen not 25 in 📼

  • @supermariof0521
    @supermariof0521 2 месяца назад

    48:42 I wonder if anyone has a copy of Siskel and Ebert's review of "Barney's Great Adventure: The Movie".

  • @ianmaclellan7623
    @ianmaclellan7623 Год назад +1

    Laserdisc setups cost a lot ofomey back then though.

    • @jeffcarlin5866
      @jeffcarlin5866 Год назад +1

      I remember when my dad bought our first D.V.D. for $39.99 plus tax. Blu-ray was expensive at first as well. I never bought a LaserDisc, but they were $50 or so, right?

  • @dragondaveltd1992
    @dragondaveltd1992 Год назад

    16:42 Can anyone understand on what Snaps just said?!?

  • @commanderkeen3787
    @commanderkeen3787 Год назад +1

    No color negative is "pristine". Color negatives begin to deteriorate the second they are developed, even in perfect storage, which is why many old films look bad in remasters. Black & white film is often pristine and will usually not deteriorate if stored correctly. If you watch a remastered black & white film, often it will look as sharp as if it was filmed yesterday

  • @WildFungus
    @WildFungus 10 месяцев назад

    wtf film did michael caine say was his favourite movie?

  • @jlscoyserney
    @jlscoyserney Год назад +1

    laserdisc paid these dudes a tonne of money clearly

    • @kyloren3693
      @kyloren3693 Год назад +3

      Yes, but laserdisc really was ahead of it's time. It had tons of features that the consumer market wouldn't see in video tech until dvd.

    • @jlscoyserney
      @jlscoyserney Год назад

      @@kyloren3693 fair

    • @ryanbates9668
      @ryanbates9668 Год назад +8

      Laserdisc wasn't a company that could pay anyone off, it was a format, and a much superior one to the alternative VHS. Maybe being film critics and all they just preferred the higher quality.