here ... Krishnamurtiji was the light and you brother were the guide. I still can't digest the fact that how someone can use familiar words to describe a not so familiar beautiful thought in a very raw manner. So in what level does the fully conscious divine be speaking!!
Im watiching this again... Roger you are great. First time you are reacting to J Krishnamurti & you are grasping what he is saying.. but honestly speaking i was like sabine.. same expression.. It took many videos for me to understand him... Now you may be thinking why am i watching again.. becoz when we watch same thing again & again then we will notice many things which we have skipped earlier.(Becoz we were not matured enough at that time) Thank You once again.
What an eye opening video guys. I really appreciate the explanation by Roger , I got alittle lost as will 😆. jiddu krishnamurti is an amazing philosopher let's see more from him
Jiddu Krishnamurthy is a very very critical to the point of being Truth Seeker and Speaker without telling or adding some fancy dancy Stories / tales around it , which oftenly goes above average minded people heads Krishnamurthy is like - Simple Plain Brutal Truth (take it leave it it's up to you ) Even Osho had so much respect and admiration for J Krishnamurthy
I think JK points out that we as human beings, tend to believe in an ideology/philosophy or just a mere thought, and by doing so we're shrinking the size of our very minds, so that it is easier to get hold of it now. The result is you get satisfaction.
Those who are discontent with every thing in this world and those who are passionate about every thing in this world both are climbing the same mountain . But 99.9% of us are neither because our discontent or passion is only to the point of convenience.
Correction: JK started by saying that it is good that he is antogonistic in the beginning, but once he went through the process of releasing the fire from reactionary, antogonistic frustration mind, he dumped that antogonistic in the end as bad thing(not good anymore).
You two are cute guys... I follow your videos just for the selections you do... and your sincerity of seeking is visible clearly... You are born in right times... Wish you good luck... In India among seekers we call this as Sat-sang.. that is being with higher ones the way you be in these videos and pondering over while you must also be doing your practicals in daily routine...
Thank You Sabina & Roger for reacting to Jiddu Krishnamurti🙏 When i started to listen to J Krishnamurti i was lost completely... when i started digging more deeper and deeper i started disbelieving everything around me.. Honestly speaking even the ancient stories😑😶 I thought i will become nastika(an Atheist).. But im a spiritual seeker..and there is no end for search.. But u know... Jiddu Krishnamurti showed me a completely different path.... Becoz of J Krishnamurti i understood what sadhguru was saying... If we dig deeper..deeper...deeper.... somewhere the Ancient Wisdom and Jiddu Krishnamurti's teaching meet...(im not comparing).. Im saying that he will show a different path...so that we will not identified with anything...(we will not hold on to anything but still searching)... So sadhguru explains Ancient Wisdom in much simpler way... Jiddu Krishnamurti says dont read any books(including books about speaker) or believe anythng.. the content of your conciousness is itself a book...(read , observe yourself).. J. Krishnamurti - Amsterdam 1981 - Public Talk 1 - Thought and time are the root of fear This one video has changed the way of my thinking.... Some other videos in my playlist...(my fav) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is there fear without the word 'fear'? | Krishnamurti The brain cells undergo a change | Krishnamurti What will change the brain cells? | Krishnamurti Can thought be separated from sensory perceptions? | J. Krishnamurti How does one go to the very source of thought? | J. Krishnamurti On the relationship between thought and consciousness | J. Krishnamurti Why can't we sustain attention? | J. Krishnamurti
Hi brijesh i also had the same thought after reading and understanding j krishnamurti buy after finding two channels called Deep knowledge and Acharya Prashant many of my doubts resolved they are way better the sadguru you should check those channels out, if you're real seeker you should start reading Zen yoga by PJ saher . It's very rare boook which contains mathematical formulas and equations about the step by step progress on spiritual path and practices you can do its very rare science.
I think, it's probably a mistake to equate what Krishnamurti says with other spiritual traditions. It's a common mistake I think people generally make, to compare his teachings with other Hindu/vedic traditions, advaita and such and think they are the same. There are some important fundamental differences imo. Krishnamurti also warns of this. He's also stated countless times his works aren't intellectual excercise or dissection. If you haven't read or studied him in detail you may be left with the impression that it is very intellectual. But if you understand him, you may find it to be very not intellectual. He's said this himself, and it's also been my experience. It's more real than intellectual.
This indicates that we are not absolute in anything means contentment or discontentment... that's why we are in creation otherwise we also would have been in the management position of this creation like god ...
I have no idea what that beautiful gentleman was speaking. I was hear for Sabina. But didn't understand anything in the shared video. I might be too simple for this to understand. So I'll leave the gentleman gracefully to you guys.
Hehe, sweet!❤️ It is a complicated video indeed 🙃 It's really wonderful that you don't judge but simply say that it's not for you. May more people react as kind as you🙏🏻✨
That COMPLETE discontent with antagonism and the flame led Siddhartha to sit and meditate until the TRUTH is revealed. The outcome, Buddha was born. That burning desire and tenacity with its complete urgency will lead to a totally different realization. That calamity is the source.
It is a very good reaction of u guys on jiddu krishnamurti.. I just wish for first time if u could choose a different video (there are plenty) to understand him much better easily and totally.. it would have been great.. please try not to ignore his teachings just because he seems very intellectual and just keeping in mind what sadhguru has talked about him..please be open.. if u pay attention to what he has to say it might work in different ways for u guys u never know.. he has that ability to change anybody..
Thanks so much for your thoughts🙏🏻 We never know what we get into before we actually watch a video😅 But I hope the next one we watch of his will be easier😅 We are not giving up yet🤗💙
In my opinion JK is a Gyan/Jnana Yogi. One of the 4 paths to reach the ultimate. The other 3 being path of Bhakti (devotion), Karma(Action), Energy. People on the path of Gyan are of the opinion that with Intellect, one can know the ultimate. Get enlightened.
He would have definitely disagreed with what you have said. You are simply repeating the words of your guru. He commented on people like you even in this video and clearly indicated that you are going nowhere.
It is those of great importance, at least the ones who take themselves as such, which are the ones who most beautifully can explain how they seem to be discontented with how this life plays out to be. And they for sure have all the answers and ideas, and if it was up to them they would scorch this earth clean of all of its discontentment and start clean over again with their own drawing board and their own interpreted symphony of perfection. That is what J is talking about. The other guy with the other fire, is no different. Two directions that does nothing but harm. One says everything is ok, one says it isn't. And if we do not understand that, then that is why we are experiencing it that way.
I watch your all videos I have one small request to you please put swami Vivekananda videos and gaur gopal das videos then very soon you will achieve millions of subscribers from India hare Krishna Om namay sivay
Sir, I think you got the opposite of what he is saying in the end(I may be wrong). In the end He said that as long you are with your "pure discontent" without developing any reaction towards it..you and me are same..but People dont do it they damp down that "pure discontent" with feeling of antagonism(They want to get rid of the feeling of discontent by developing hateful emotions towards others)..as soon as you become antagonistic you move away from the "pure discontent" and this causes the difference between you and speaker. if you stay with that "pure discontent" or "pure longing" without developing any reaction towards it..then that "longing" will guide you to your true self.
Yes, This interpretation sounds correct. He said never developing any reaction/being antagonist. Just pure discontent(flame without any form) then both are same.
I'm glad manoj pointed out this. I was about to comment the same thing as manoj. When Roger was explaining in the end, I was like no,no, no...no. You got it wrong brother! No judgment tho roger, much love😄
It's an EPIC book! Sabine is just 'reading it' (more like meditating it😅) it and Roger already did. Absolutely recommended. It's like mini meditations/pith instructions 🤯
The way how I understood is, he started with saying that "discontent with something" or "discontent in itself (innate)". If disconnect with something, then there is a course that is easily attainable, and by doing so we are satisfied, at the same time narrowing the mind. Discontent with everything (immovable) and not trying to get anything from the speaker or any sort of certainty. Then this flame is same as Speaker's. Fire is Fire. Discontent with everything but antagonist against the speaker (not immovable) then this flame (Questioner) is not the same as Speaker's. Fire is dampened.
there is three thing is important need wisdom compassion and medetation these are the toll bring us to othere shore our whrre our own inner buddha waiting fou us many life time may be this life or other we will hear the voice and take the journey . tenzin dolma
What he means to say that perhaps that when you are angry or hateful towards anything you are no longer neutral you are no longer indifferent to that thing which you hate, when you show hatred and anger towards anything you are taking a position vis-a-vis that thing ..... what he means to say perhaps that being indifferent to a particular thing is far worse than being reactionary to a particular thing even if that reaction may be negative ..... so even when you show negative reaction you show charge you no longer stay neutral ..... when you start to be positive or negative about anything you start to feed something to something ..... the fact also is that many things die because of indifference or because of lack of attention..... Because I believe love and hated both are capable of spurring growth in something .
Yeah, first JK reaction. 👏 Poor Sabine, I guess some other video could have been better for the first time 😂. She felt the energy though! But Roger was there, loved the pauses in this video, they were needed! For me sometimes, It takes a couple rewind and play and rewind…… JK is like no other. In most of his videos I watched so far he says, “I wonder if you follow all this” and yes he always refers himself as The Speaker Please watch “End the known now” by JK. Sabine, you’ll not be lost here.
Sadhguru wanted to become a Guru, he wanted fame, that's why he forcibly became an Enlightened One by doing Sadhana, whereas Krishnamurti had no such desire, he neither wanted to be Enlightened nor wanted fame, in fact even when Theosophical Society tried to make him one, he rejected the title of Jagatguru(world teacher), In short he was a naturally Enlightened One, that is why Sadhguru's words reflect logic and cleverness whereas Krishnamurti's words reflect deep insight. 💞🙏🏻
JK here says about two, one totally discontent and the other exactly the opposite. Do you really agree that two such entities exist at all...no way. In Cosmic terms we are just new-born babies and a lot less a microscopic speck. The Cosmos exists for the individual only as long as the individual entity lives; once dead, nothing exists. JK makes a lot of statements or explanations but he does not show any way ahead since such is the nature of the Cosmic entity. Perhaps!! Kenopanishad says, it does not know !!! The human tools of perception are highly limited....we can't even look at our own back. All our knowledge is based on memory and nothing springs afresh. We do not have the medium of communication...at all. I am not at all pessimistic. I know there is way...someone shall arrive....Good Luck.
At 36:55 you're wrong there, he says at 30:30 the antagonism dampens the flame, it doesn't fuel it. The moment you are antagonistic, you have moved away from him. The two flames are only the same when they meet without antagonism (as he says).
As far as I understand, Krishnamurti, is that Krishnamurti doesn't favor contentment over discontentment. The questioners state, in the video, is smothered through his antagonism, he is not any more totally with discontent. Therefore, he is not that flame anymore. I think Roger is wrong when he says antagonism and aggression are on a higher level, and K is endorsing that. I think K would quite be happy to meet this totally discontent person because then two flames would meet. Two immovable beings meet then. When I understood it correctly, then it would be two beings, without cause. Because the questioners discontent has neither a cause because he is discontent with everything. And there is no end to things without a cause. That would be my explanation of that video. I am seeing it, probably the fourth or fifth time and still not really sure.
Who makes fun of parmahansa yogananda , sri sri ravi shankar, Sadhguru brahmakumaris, sndeep maheshwari, even books like secret A big NOOOOO. He is. Frustated not spiritual 😅😅
@@AbhaySingh-ke7ej he is fearless and alive promoting veganism, geeta,vedanta, kabir etc.. He promotes 24X7sprituality rather than 1 hrs escapist feel good sprituality..He has valid practical reasons for making fun of those and also of Cosumerism and liberalism.. Above all his teaching worked for me..!!
We are not familiar with him at all, and still have some other teachers that we do know about that we would like to learn from first... Thank you though 🙏🙏💙💙 Very happy that he has helped you
We started to watch it, and realized very quickly that it is more political than Spiritual... We are a Spiritual Channel... There are other channels out there for that... Sorry 🙏💙
apa yg dijelaskan oleh krishnaji itu bukan intelektualitas,verbal tetapi aktualitas, krishnaji melakukan dialog dengan audience untuk menjalin hubungan pada level yang sama bukan penjelasan intelektual penuh teori ilusi.
JK is good but i dont trust sadghuru a bit that guy is crooked, he always talks about not looking down or up to anybody but his pictures are all around the ashrams where his sheep work and help him bild his own empire
Who makes fun of parmahansa yogananda , sri sri ravi shankar, Sadhguru brahmakumaris, sndeep maheshwari, even books like secret A big NOOOOO. He is. Frustated not spiritual 😅😅
![Hunxho - Ball Forever [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nki9ZTF9Uls/mqdefault.jpg)
Shadguru can think he is all intellect but that last seconds touch your heart because it shows you how beautiful truth is
J Krishnamurti speaks with such passion he puts his heart in everything he says🕉️
Great teaching jiddu Krishnamurti sir love you all
here ... Krishnamurtiji was the light and you brother were the guide. I still can't digest the fact that how someone can use familiar words to describe a not so familiar beautiful thought in a very raw manner. So in what level does the fully conscious divine be speaking!!
Im watiching this again... Roger you are great. First time you are reacting to J Krishnamurti & you are grasping what he is saying.. but honestly speaking i was like sabine.. same expression.. It took many videos for me to understand him...
Now you may be thinking why am i watching again.. becoz when we watch same thing again & again then we will notice many things which we have skipped earlier.(Becoz we were not matured enough at that time)
Thank You once again.
Krishnamurti's teaching is very revolutionary
What an eye opening video guys. I really appreciate the explanation by Roger , I got alittle lost as will 😆. jiddu krishnamurti is an amazing philosopher let's see more from him
Glad you liked it 🙏🙏💙💙
Roger's understanding is incredible. He is clearly highly developed.
Awww... Thank you... But I see from some of the other comments here that there are also other ways to interpret what he said.... Very fascinating 🙏🙏💙💙
Jiddu Krishnamurthy is a very very critical to the point of being Truth Seeker and Speaker without telling or adding some fancy dancy Stories / tales around it , which oftenly goes above average minded people heads
Krishnamurthy is like - Simple Plain Brutal Truth (take it leave it it's up to you )
Even Osho had so much respect and admiration for J Krishnamurthy
Thank you, Sabine & Roger! We wish you a wonderful winter time! ❤️❄️🎄
To a wonderful winter time everyone 😃💙🌏✨❄️🎄
Krishnamurti is the GOAT
I think JK points out that we as human beings, tend to believe in an ideology/philosophy or just a mere thought, and by doing so we're shrinking the size of our very minds, so that it is easier to get hold of it now. The result is you get satisfaction.
Damn I have been studying JK for 20 years and I still discover new depts to the same vids. Your translation helps me see even more new things. Thank!
kindly react to "Is there GOD?" by krishnamurti. That explains a lot of his belief and answers a lot. This one was a tough one truly.
Don't use the word OLD TEACHINGS. He is 1000 years ahead of us ☺😊
😉
absolutely.. absolutely.. absolutely
He is not ahead nor behind, he is beyond the time.
Those who are discontent with every thing in this world and those who are passionate about every thing in this world both are climbing the same mountain . But 99.9% of us are neither because our discontent or passion is only to the point of convenience.
Well Said 🙏🙏💙💙
Thank you brother, for this explanation.
It’s called comfortable enough to be miserable most of the time.
Correction: JK started by saying that it is good that he is antogonistic in the beginning, but once he went through the process of releasing the fire from reactionary, antogonistic frustration mind, he dumped that antogonistic in the end as bad thing(not good anymore).
He very well defined the possibility in absence on congruity. Very nice.
logical tradition .Hard-core logic not very soothing but its a big school of hindu philosophy.
You both are so sweet I love both of you ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ love from India my friend ❤
Jai Shree Krishna 🙏🙏
Thank you so much 😊 Love back from Canada 🙏💙📿🦚🦚📿💙🙏
@@RaiseTheWorldProjectNow 😍🥰🥰
You people are absolute legends 😎😎😎.... ❤️From India
Legends is a big word☺️🤩
❤️ from Canada to you Abhijit
@@RaiseTheWorldProjectNow 😊❤️
now they see what sadh guru was talking about when he said they didnt get krishnamrti
Sri m ❤️
Wow! Love this teacher. Thankyou for all the explanations I needed them!!
You are so welcome! 🙏🙏💙💙
he was and is not a teacher, jk said it himself
Sir and Mam lots of love and respect from India
Great review by you both and that's given time to think along with you on what the 'Speaker' was saying.
His videos on death and timelessness are really cool. Great reaction guys!
Go inward to know what lies in the outward.
Discontentment is good to occur without which one cannot know the TRUTH in exploring the contentment.
I was picturizing when Ramdass met Maharaji (Neem Karoli baba) 😇😇 on his first visit.
You two are cute guys... I follow your videos just for the selections you do... and your sincerity of seeking is visible clearly... You are born in right times... Wish you good luck... In India among seekers we call this as Sat-sang.. that is being with higher ones the way you be in these videos and pondering over while you must also be doing your practicals in daily routine...
Thank You Sabina & Roger for reacting to Jiddu Krishnamurti🙏
When i started to listen to J Krishnamurti i was lost completely... when i started digging more deeper and deeper i started disbelieving everything around me.. Honestly speaking even the ancient stories😑😶
I thought i will become nastika(an Atheist).. But im a spiritual seeker..and there is no end for search..
But u know... Jiddu Krishnamurti showed me a completely different path....
Becoz of J Krishnamurti i understood what sadhguru was saying...
If we dig deeper..deeper...deeper.... somewhere the Ancient Wisdom and Jiddu Krishnamurti's teaching meet...(im not comparing).. Im saying that he will show a different path...so that we will not identified with anything...(we will not hold on to anything but still searching)...
So sadhguru explains Ancient Wisdom in much simpler way... Jiddu Krishnamurti says dont read any books(including books about speaker) or believe anythng.. the content of your conciousness is itself a book...(read , observe yourself)..
J. Krishnamurti - Amsterdam 1981 - Public Talk 1 - Thought and time are the root of fear
This one video has changed the way of my thinking....
Some other videos in my playlist...(my fav)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there fear without the word 'fear'? | Krishnamurti
The brain cells undergo a change | Krishnamurti
What will change the brain cells? | Krishnamurti
Can thought be separated from sensory perceptions? | J. Krishnamurti
How does one go to the very source of thought? | J. Krishnamurti
On the relationship between thought and consciousness | J. Krishnamurti
Why can't we sustain attention? | J. Krishnamurti
Excellent! 🙏🙏💙💙 Thanks for Sharing
Hi brijesh i also had the same thought after reading and understanding j krishnamurti buy after finding two channels called Deep knowledge and Acharya Prashant many of my doubts resolved they are way better the sadguru you should check those channels out, if you're real seeker you should start reading Zen yoga by PJ saher . It's very rare boook which contains mathematical formulas and equations about the step by step progress on spiritual path and practices you can do its very rare science.
Like an existential suffering!
I think, it's probably a mistake to equate what Krishnamurti says with other spiritual traditions. It's a common mistake I think people generally make, to compare his teachings with other Hindu/vedic traditions, advaita and such and think they are the same. There are some important fundamental differences imo. Krishnamurti also warns of this. He's also stated countless times his works aren't intellectual excercise or dissection. If you haven't read or studied him in detail you may be left with the impression that it is very intellectual. But if you understand him, you may find it to be very not intellectual. He's said this himself, and it's also been my experience. It's more real than intellectual.
This indicates that we are not absolute in anything means contentment or discontentment... that's why we are in creation otherwise we also would have been in the management position of this creation like god ...
You may check with JIddu Krishnamurti's best known book "The first and last freedom"
I have no idea what that beautiful gentleman was speaking. I was hear for Sabina. But didn't understand anything in the shared video. I might be too simple for this to understand. So I'll leave the gentleman gracefully to you guys.
Hehe, sweet!❤️ It is a complicated video indeed 🙃 It's really wonderful that you don't judge but simply say that it's not for you. May more people react as kind as you🙏🏻✨
That COMPLETE discontent with antagonism and the flame led Siddhartha to sit and meditate until the TRUTH is revealed. The outcome, Buddha was born.
That burning desire and tenacity with its complete urgency will lead to a totally different realization. That calamity is the source.
🙏🙏💙💙
It is a very good reaction of u guys on jiddu krishnamurti.. I just wish for first time if u could choose a different video (there are plenty) to understand him much better easily and totally.. it would have been great.. please try not to ignore his teachings just because he seems very intellectual and just keeping in mind what sadhguru has talked about him..please be open.. if u pay attention to what he has to say it might work in different ways for u guys u never know.. he has that ability to change anybody..
Thanks so much for your thoughts🙏🏻 We never know what we get into before we actually watch a video😅 But I hope the next one we watch of his will be easier😅 We are not giving up yet🤗💙
ISKCON temple video reaction 🙏🕉️
In my opinion JK is a Gyan/Jnana Yogi.
One of the 4 paths to reach the ultimate. The other 3 being path of Bhakti (devotion), Karma(Action), Energy.
People on the path of Gyan are of the opinion that with Intellect, one can know the ultimate. Get enlightened.
Why do you compare ?
He would have definitely disagreed with what you have said. You are simply repeating the words of your guru. He commented on people like you even in this video and clearly indicated that you are going nowhere.
Please react to as much as krishna and Mahabharata and bhagavad gita videos 😍😍😍 love ur reaction
Roger explain it very well what jk is talking about
He describe himself as oneself or speaker, he did not used 'I' to express himself.
It is those of great importance, at least the ones who take themselves as such, which are the ones who most beautifully can explain how they seem to be discontented with how this life plays out to be. And they for sure have all the answers and ideas, and if it was up to them they would scorch this earth clean of all of its discontentment and start clean over again with their own drawing board and their own interpreted symphony of perfection. That is what J is talking about.
The other guy with the other fire, is no different. Two directions that does nothing but harm. One says everything is ok, one says it isn't. And if we do not understand that, then that is why we are experiencing it that way.
Poor you guys you went into wrong topic first hand
He is something I can’t describe
Blissful
Please react to UG Krishnamurthi's
You are all afraid video..
He is saying that your antagonism dampens the discontent, hence it is a moving away, which is undesirable.
I watch your all videos I have one small request to you please put swami Vivekananda videos and gaur gopal das videos then very soon you will achieve millions of subscribers from India hare Krishna
Om namay sivay
🙏💙📿🔱🦚🦚🔱📿💙🙏
Sir, I think you got the opposite of what he is saying in the end(I may be wrong).
In the end He said that as long you are with your "pure discontent" without developing any reaction towards it..you and me are same..but People dont do it they damp down that "pure discontent" with feeling of antagonism(They want to get rid of the feeling of discontent by developing hateful emotions towards others)..as soon as you become antagonistic you move away from the "pure discontent" and this causes the difference between you and speaker.
if you stay with that "pure discontent" or "pure longing" without developing any reaction towards it..then that "longing" will guide you to your true self.
Hmmmm... Yes I see how there can be different interpretations... Even now I think that what I said meant what you are saying here... 🙏🙏💙💙
Yes, This interpretation sounds correct. He said never developing any reaction/being antagonist. Just pure discontent(flame without any form) then both are same.
I'm glad manoj pointed out this. I was about to comment the same thing as manoj. When Roger was explaining in the end, I was like no,no, no...no. You got it wrong brother! No judgment tho roger, much love😄
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🌺🌸🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
thanks for reacting....great j.k
❤️
Namaskaram 🙏🙏🙏.
Awesome reaction to jk
PLease react to challenge of change by krishnamurti
Nisargadatta maharaja...book- 'I am that'.
It's an EPIC book! Sabine is just 'reading it' (more like meditating it😅) it and Roger already did. Absolutely recommended. It's like mini meditations/pith instructions 🤯
Great 🥰
In this video, Roger belonged to the miniscule % of World's population and Sabrina belonged to the majority. 😃😆😂🤣. Who wins? 🤔😀
Hahahaha totally! We all win in this Divine Play 😁
A reaction video about silence? Silence is ending of reaction.
Thank you from Greece.
How wonderful! You are the first one greeting us from Greece🌏💙
React to "soojugada" devotional song
The way how I understood is, he started with saying that "discontent with something" or "discontent in itself (innate)". If disconnect with something, then there is a course that is easily attainable, and by doing so we are satisfied, at the same time narrowing the mind.
Discontent with everything (immovable) and not trying to get anything from the speaker or any sort of certainty. Then this flame is same as Speaker's. Fire is Fire.
Discontent with everything but antagonist against the speaker (not immovable) then this flame (Questioner) is not the same as Speaker's. Fire is dampened.
Ah... Ok Thank you 😊🙏💙
I think the 2nd sentence somewhat explains the meaning of "Brahmacharya"... Please correct me if im wrong.. Thank You
🙏🙏🙏❤️
.l once hear that our true buddha nature calling us to connect with it other wise no matter what we do we always seeking and don;t what it is.
there is three thing is important need wisdom compassion and medetation these are the toll bring us to othere shore our whrre our own inner buddha waiting fou us many life time may be this life or other we will hear the voice and take the journey . tenzin dolma
🙏🙏💙💙
What he means to say that perhaps that when you are angry or hateful towards anything you are no longer neutral you are no longer indifferent to that thing which you hate, when you show hatred and anger towards anything you are taking a position vis-a-vis that thing ..... what he means to say perhaps that being indifferent to a particular thing is far worse than being reactionary to a particular thing even if that reaction may be negative ..... so even when you show negative reaction you show charge you no longer stay neutral ..... when you start to be positive or negative about anything you start to feed something to something ..... the fact also is that many things die because of indifference or because of lack of attention.....
Because I believe love and hated both are capable of spurring growth in something .
Oh yes 🙏🙏💙💙 Thank you... Nice perspective
Nice
Sabine was me in the whole video😇🙃
Hehe, glad I am not alone 😁❤️❤️
Yeah, first JK reaction. 👏
Poor Sabine, I guess some other video could have been better for the first time 😂. She felt the energy though! But Roger was there, loved the pauses in this video, they were needed!
For me sometimes, It takes a couple rewind and play and rewind…… JK is like no other. In most of his videos I watched so far he says, “I wonder if you follow all this” and yes he always refers himself as The Speaker
Please watch “End the known now” by JK.
Sabine, you’ll not be lost here.
😂😂🙏💙 Thank you...
🎭⚛️🎭
Sadhguru wanted to become a Guru, he wanted fame, that's why he forcibly became an Enlightened One by doing Sadhana, whereas Krishnamurti had no such desire, he neither wanted to be Enlightened nor wanted fame, in fact even when Theosophical Society tried to make him one, he rejected the title of Jagatguru(world teacher),
In short he was a naturally Enlightened One, that is why Sadhguru's words reflect logic and cleverness whereas Krishnamurti's words reflect deep insight. 💞🙏🏻
There are many videos of jk with better audio visual quality...🙏💕
J Krishnamurti always talks about himself in 3rd person, he uses we and he when he talks about himself
JK here says about two, one totally discontent and the other exactly the opposite. Do you really agree that two such entities exist at all...no way. In Cosmic terms we are just new-born babies and a lot less a microscopic speck. The Cosmos exists for the individual only as long as the individual entity lives; once dead, nothing exists. JK makes a lot of statements or explanations but he does not show any way ahead since such is the nature of the Cosmic entity. Perhaps!! Kenopanishad says, it does not know !!! The human tools of perception are highly limited....we can't even look at our own back. All our knowledge is based on memory and nothing springs afresh. We do not have the medium of communication...at all. I am not at all pessimistic. I know there is way...someone shall arrive....Good Luck.
You need to watch just him no one else
Alan watt also talk about jk in some of his podcast
I love it how they are all connected🙂 Let's see if we can find that podcast😍
At 36:55 you're wrong there, he says at 30:30 the antagonism dampens the flame, it doesn't fuel it. The moment you are antagonistic, you have moved away from him. The two flames are only the same when they meet without antagonism (as he says).
As far as I understand, Krishnamurti, is that Krishnamurti doesn't favor contentment over discontentment. The questioners state, in the video, is smothered through his antagonism, he is not any more totally with discontent. Therefore, he is not that flame anymore. I think Roger is wrong when he says antagonism and aggression are on a higher level, and K is endorsing that. I think K would quite be happy to meet this totally discontent person because then two flames would meet. Two immovable beings meet then.
When I understood it correctly, then it would be two beings, without cause. Because the questioners discontent has neither a cause because he is discontent with everything. And there is no end to things without a cause. That would be my explanation of that video. I am seeing it, probably the fourth or fifth time and still not really sure.
When are u going to upload the Sadhguru's past 4 lives reaction
When you guys react sadguru videos that makes you popular because sadguru is as popular as krishna himself in today's world
Plz do react on four gopal das videos
We already published one and soon more
Ananya Bhat Performance in front of Sadhguru 😍😍
es passiert jedem, du musst ihm nur aufmerksamer zuhören, du wirst es bekommen, keine Sorge... übrigens, es ist Google Translate XDXD
Aww... How sweet... 😊🥰💙🙏 Thank you
React to "Acharya prashant"
Who makes fun of parmahansa yogananda , sri sri ravi shankar, Sadhguru brahmakumaris, sndeep maheshwari, even books like secret A big NOOOOO. He is. Frustated not spiritual 😅😅
@@AbhaySingh-ke7ej he is fearless and alive promoting veganism, geeta,vedanta, kabir etc.. He promotes 24X7sprituality rather than 1 hrs escapist feel good sprituality..He has valid practical reasons for making fun of those and also of Cosumerism and liberalism.. Above all his teaching worked for me..!!
We are not familiar with him at all, and still have some other teachers that we do know about that we would like to learn from first... Thank you though 🙏🙏💙💙 Very happy that he has helped you
And further I think you have not actually understood what he said... If you really want to understand you need to be more than this...
Sir and Mam please react on are u brainwashed about india Karolina goswami video
We started to watch it, and realized very quickly that it is more political than Spiritual... We are a Spiritual Channel... There are other channels out there for that... Sorry 🙏💙
apa yg dijelaskan oleh krishnaji itu bukan intelektualitas,verbal tetapi aktualitas, krishnaji melakukan dialog dengan audience untuk menjalin hubungan pada level yang sama bukan penjelasan intelektual penuh teori ilusi.
Sadly he did not understand J krishnamurti.
JK is good but i dont trust sadghuru a bit that guy is crooked, he always talks about not looking down or up to anybody but his pictures are all around the ashrams where his sheep work and help him bild his own empire
When will you guys explore Acharya Prashant??
Who makes fun of parmahansa yogananda , sri sri ravi shankar, Sadhguru brahmakumaris, sndeep maheshwari, even books like secret A big NOOOOO. He is. Frustated not spiritual 😅😅
We are not sure... There are many teachers we know of that we still have to cover first... 🙏🙏💙💙