Love your perspective - too many people have been trained to believe problems are solved by buying more gear. As a creative professional, I've learned that the best equipment is the always the thing between your ears ;) I'm a 6400 fan too - just subbed - cheers!
Thanks for this, i've been struggling to chose which camera to get and seeing as i'm just trying to get into videography this really helps me know what is should save up for, thank you so much you've just gained a really appreciative subscriber. Thanks🙏
Peace to you brother, I'm a new study starting with the ax6400. For some reason when I record in dark places my light isn't coming on😪 Also, lately when I take shots in manual or auto I see a blinkig white lighy. All of these shots are outdoors with Christmas lights in the background.
Thank you for asking! Thats called flicker. If all of the lights blinking than you should switch your camera from NTSC to PAL region or reverse. It causes some flickering. Check your region. I'm in a PAL region so i use it in PAL. Which changes the framerates from 24/60/120 to 25/50/100. Or if you have flickering in photo mode, than turn off the silent shooting mode, cause it causes that horrible lines on your frame. Have a nice day bro! :D
Hi Peter I am so confused between Canon R10 and sony A6400 which is best for photography and video?? Specially photography which is best for me ?? I have been using NikonD3300 📷 camera since eight years Now I want to be a bit more professional which is best for me ??
Hi! Huh it's a though question. Canon R10 and sony a6400 also a good camera. Not that much difference. I'm a sony guy, but I think between the two maybe the canon R10 a slightly better camera, because of the 4k60p. It has a big crop, but it's a good feature. I think both camera systems are good. In this price range the cameras kind a same. I can recommend the a6400 for photography and videography too. I think it's a solid pick. But keep in mind that the 4k of this camera has a terrible rolling shutter, but for interviews or this kind of shots it's not that much problem. In FHD you can go up to 120fps, so good for slow-motion. I don't want to dig deeper about the specs, because it not matters that much in my opinion. Both the Canon and the Sony has cons and pros. In Sony system you have a lot of third party lenses like Tamron, Sigma, Viltrox, Samyang..etc which is more budget friendly. I'm a sony user, so I recommend the sony more than the Canon. But Canon are also good. So it's a hard question my friend. I hope I was able to give some thoughts for the decision.
For photography, I'd probably go for the Canon. Canon tend to have better looking images straight out of camera. I have an A6400 and I also have a Canon DSLR.
Hi, Thinking to buy a6400, but also confused on a6700. The a6700 is out of my budget, and would need to wait atleast 3 4 months more. Also as this will be my first camera, not sure whether I should spend this much money in body alone. Planning to buy 50mm f1.8 with the a6400. Will use for both photo and video. Waiting for your feedback.
Hi! The a6700 is basically an upgraded a6400 you get bigger battery, In body stabilization, 10bit colors, and 4k 120fps and Ai autofocus. So if you ask me i would recommend the a6700 for long term. For video it's much better than the a6400. You'll grow out the a6400 so fast. I had an a6400 and after 3 years i felt that a little bit weak next to my other comeras. So a6700 more futureproof. But i would pick a more versatile lens than a 50mm f1.8 because it will be so limiting. You know if its a fullframe lens, than you will get a 1.5x crop if you use it on an apsc sensor camera like the a6700 or the a6400. So it will be around 75mm which is not versatile at all. I would go for the sigma 18-50 f2.8 . It's a great budget midrange all rounder lens. You will be thank me, because 50 and 75mm is so tight. You'll feel the tight limitations after a while. And usually people cant buy multiple lenses at first to cover all the focal lenghts. So a good zoom lens is a much better option. It's better to cover a lot of focal lengths (which looks also really good) than master 1 focal length and lose all the others. So if you ask me you should be a little bit patient. It will be much better in long term. I waited almost 2 years to get my bigger sony camera, and it worth every penny.
@@petersroom thanks man for your detailed advice. Will surely help a lot. However, as I am a hobbyist photographer, won't be able to make money from it . Also considering a6600 now, if not a6700 due to the Ibis, let's see..
Hi Peter, loving your content. I picked up the A6400 about 3 weeks ago, and I'm slowly trying to build up my gear as well. Also a growing youtuber, hopefully things go well haha. Subscribed to your channel, can't wait for the next video man.
Thanks man!🙏 I really appreciate. For youtube i think tha a6400 is a perfect choice. It will serve you many years. I hope your channel will do well, keep it up. Have a nice day! ✌
@@violettamae9388 Hi! I think this camera is an excellent choice for travel video/photo. The compact form factor, the price and the overall performance is very good. The lenses are so much cheaper than the fullframe ones and there are some third party lenses which is cheaper and works kind a same, or maybe better, than the native sony lenses. So i can recommend it for traveling. Have a nice day! ✌
Currently in the market for my first camera and the A6400 hits all the right spots. Especially with the vast lens eco system Sony and the other brands have created for the E mount!
Thank you for sharing! I dont know how S&Q help with the shakes. If you mean slow motion, than you only have slowmo in FullHD (in the a6400) and i usually work in 4k..but sure it's just a preference. Yes, the gimbal could help..if you could bring one with you. I have 2 gimbals, so it would be logical to bring one of them with me. But when you're for example in a trip with you wife or with your friends, there is a chance you don't want to bring a gimbal to a plane and walk around in the city all day with your expensive toy... especially if you are for example bigger cities where there are many robbers. And if you're a hybrid shooter like me, than the gimbal could be a big problem. So overall, yes... the gimbal could help you, but not all the time it's the best solution.
Thanks! I think the a6400 is still one of the best camera to jump into the sony ecosystem. I sold mine, because i had to upgrade and couldnt afford a third camera.. but i miss it so much. Sometimes i thought that i save some money and buy one again.
Hey, already subbed! Just bought the 6400 and looking to make cinematic footage and i'm confused which is the best picture profile (heard the s-log2 is not recommended for this camera)
Thanks man! I appreciate🙏 I'll make a video about the picture profiles, but here is the short answer. If you dont know much about colorgrade, i recommend the HLG pp which is the [pp10] on your a6400. You'll get good amount of dynamic range. If you want to play with colorgrade, try the Cine4. I made a custom pp to my pp1 slot. These are the settings: blacklevel +15, Gamut: Cine4. Colormode: Pro. Everything else is 0 or not changed. It lifts shadows a little bit so you have to correct at the editing part. I mostly use this Cine4, because it does not compress that much like the slog so the image won't fall apart, because of the 8-bit. And you'll get better dynamic range than HLG. But i think You can give a shot to slog-2, I think if you just correct the image (contrast,exposure) you won't see any difference. In the editing part, if you try to pull the colors, you can notice that some point the colors starts to fall apart. So ifyou dont want to go deeper and if you want instantly good image pick the HLG on pp10. Have a nice day! ✌
If you want a beginner budget sony apsc camera, i think this is the best choice. The zv-e10 is kind a same, but i like more the a6400 body. New sony apsc cameras will announce soon, but i think it'll be more expensive than the a6400. You know it depends on what you want to make with the camera. I can recommend it for taking pictures for social media and you can make pretty good videos for youtube. So it's a great hybrid camera if you have just started. And yes there are new features, but i think it doesn't matter that much. I like 10bit footage, but its not must have. I like 4k60, but i can live without. In the end you'll see that if you can't do good photos or videos with the a6400 you'll not able to do with a "better" camera like fx30 or with the higher end models. Nowadays i also use my a6400 for making content and i also have the a7sIII. I use a7sIII instead of the a6400 where the a6400 is not too good, like in the fast pased shots (because of the rolling shutter). So i can recommend it, and after a while you'll be very confident with the a camera and you'll feel the limitations. Then you can step up to a more advanced camera, and you can appreciate the new features which you missed from the previous one. I hope I was able to help you choose.
Hey! Thank you for asking. It depends on your needs. You have to know that what are you missing from the a6400. If the fullframe can help with that, buy a fullframe. But keep in mind, that in the fullframe world, everything is more expensive. I could buy 3 apsc lenses of the cost of my 1 fullframe lens. I think if you shoot stills for social media, the FF doesnt matter that much. The fullframe sensor helps you to push the boundaries out, because its better in low light, or the dynamic range is better. But I think it's not that much upgrade. If i show you 2 pictures, one made by a6400 and the other one by with a FF camera, you can't tell the difference. I think if i were you I would pick apsc lenses to make you're versatility better instead of jumping into the FF world. Anyway, if you don't know if FF would be a good investment, then still, APSC is a perfectly good choice. But you can try a fullframe camera. You can rent it for 1 day, its not that pricy, and you can see the results. Have a nice day mate 🙌
Can you suggest me a camera to buy my main reason to buy a camera is for making a Short film and I need a camera which is budget friendly so can you please help
Hey! I think for starting out the a6400 / zv-e10 could be the best budget option. With some zoom lens like the sigma 18-50 f2.8. If you have more budget, the next level is the a6700 /zv-e10 mark II. I prefer the a6700 because of the optical stabilisation and "better body". These cameras are insane good. you get 4k 10bit even in slowmotion. And the budget professional choice is the fx30. It has fans, so it will not overheat on you. But the a6700 also won't overheat if you use properly. (don't shoot 120fps 1 hour straight) I hope it helps bro :D
I think its not about buying the camera its about picking the ecosystem. Because when you buy one of them you will invest into a brand. I like better the sony so i would 100% go with the a6400. You will get a lot of lens options and great autofocus etc… its really reliable. 😎👌
Can i get rolling shutter in 1080p also? I'm really confused between zve10 and a6400 Can you please tell who is the clear winner in this two I'm more into filmmaking
Hi mate! Yes you have some rolling shutter in 1080p too, but it's so much better. The zv-e10 and the a6400 are kind the same. Same sensor, samer video codecs, etc.. The main differences between the two is the body. The body of the a6400 is a little bit bulkier, you have more buttons to customize and a little bit more comfortable. The zv-e10 has some extra features, like the fully articulated screen and active stabilization while the a6400 lacks of any stabilization. I think for filmmaking the zv-e10 is a little bit better, because of the articulating screen and the active stabilization. Have a nice day! :D
I'm beginner. I'm confused either Canon M50 mark ii or Sony A6400. I mostly wanna focus on taking pictures like potrait and scenery, and maybe for fun video. I really need help and also a little bit details on it cause I'm not really have many knowledge about camera
I dont know exactly the canon system, but overall i like more the sony system. I show the a6400 advantages over the canon M50. 1.) The sony a6400 has a lot of picture profiles, which is great if you want to make a little bit more professional videos. (the picture profiles adds more dynamic range to your cameras, so you can protect more the highlights and the shadows on your pictures. Almost every professional camera has picture profiles). The Canon does not have professional picture profiles or kind a same like the sony (S-log, cine, HLG). (as far as i know) 2) The a6400 has better buildt body, which is great, because when you shoot, the grip is much more comfortable than the M50. My friend had M50 and i dont like the grip, its to small to my big hands. 3) With sony you have awesome budget third party lenses like: Tamron, Sigma, Viltrox, Samyang, laowa. So you can choose between a lot of lens, which is not that pricy. 4) The autofocus is so great in the a6400. You have eye autofocus in photography and face autofocus in video mode. You have touch creen and when you touch somewhere, the focus goes there. And you have great track focus too. 5) You can record in 4k 25/30 fps which looks awesome. The camera oversamples from 6k and compress down to 4k. I think it looks cool. And the a6400 is not overheat, so you can record until your batteries die. 6) For taking pictures it's also a very good camera. You can check my pictures on my street photography videos. Easy to use and looks stunning. So overall i think for beginners the a6400 is a great choice, in my opinion its better than the M50. But it's my preference. I recommend the a6400. I hope I was able to help you make a decision. If you have some questions, you can ask anytime. Have a nice day! ✌
Thanks for asking. I think yes. I've shot several weddings with the a6400 (even on a completely sunny day) and it works great. There are two downsides to this camera. I recommend shooting in FHD instead of 4k for weddings because 4k doesn't look good with the rolling shutter. And most of the time I like to shoot in 60p, because it is possible to slow down the recording. The second issue is battery life. But I managed it with a power bank and chargers. I have 3 batteries and if I use one, the other two can be charged. But the image quality in fullHD is fine in my opinion, but there is not so much room for cropping, so you have to frame it correctly. If you have just started, I can also recommend it for a weddings. If you have some questions, feel free to ask. Have a nice day 😀
Thank you for asking! Sure. I made weddings and corporate photoshoots too with the a6400 and i didnt have any problem with the camera capabilities. The only thing that i want to mention is that you have to change batteries more often than the a7III. I only recommend the original Sony batteries. You’ll be grateful. So if you’re beginner i can recommend this camera. I started to make weddings with a6400 and 18-105 f4 during the day and some primes when the sun goes down. The science means the “color science”, which means how the camera renders the color tones. Sony always has some colder color science, sometimes the human skin looks a little bit purple instead of the natural skincolor. With the newer science the skin and the colors overall looks more natural and pleasing straight out of the camera. So in the a6400 you’ll get better science. The same as the a7III. And the a6400 has better autofocus features than the a7III. Dont worry to get this little boy. ✌️
@@dj-kj2zr I think high pixel is not the key if you want sharp images. I can make razor sharp images only with 12megapixel and i can make washed out pictures with 24mp or 33mp. 1) You need enough and good quality light 2) good focus and aperture 3) sharp lens 4) High shutter speed. But there are some advanced technique to achieve more resolution. 1) stack your images 2) increse the resolution digitally but the resolution does not mean that you picture will "POP". You can make an image shot by with your phone looks dope, if you know masking and colorgrading. I think you have to shape your light with masks to pull the viewers attention to a specific point. And if you can use contrast well your image looks so much sharper. I have one lightroom tutorial, where i use masks: ruclips.net/video/l1p-rVVUkho/видео.html
I want to buy my first camera (mainly for videos but also for photos) and I was thinking about a6400. but I would prefer to use a camera without the gimbal. Is it possible or would you go for a different camera?
Thank you for asking! Yes i can recommend this camera. It's perfect for photography. I really liked it. In video, there are some workarounds to make stable footage. You can pick stabilised lenses, those could help you a lot in handheld situations. You can rig it up with smallrig cage and a top handle, that could also help a lot with that extra contact point. But if you want in body stabilization, (which stacks with the lens stabilization) there is the new a6700 or the older a6600 which has the same sensor as the a6400. But i would go for the a6700 instead of the a6600. It's performing much better in video and it has all the fancy new Ai focus features. But if you want to stay budget, i recommend the a6400. Have a nice day mate!
You’re welcome ☺️ it depends on what you shoot. For portraits the 50mm 1.8 is good. If you mean FE 50mm f1.8. Its around 75mm on crop sensor. But if you want wide shots too, it will be tight. What do you want to shoot?
Thank you for asking! I'm a sony boy, so i know better the sony advanteges than canon. But i think the r10 a slightly better camera. You have 4k60p. Its a choice between the sony or canon. If you would like to invest to a camera system, i think you'll be stick to it. Cause after a while you'll buy new lenses etc.. I like the sony because of the third party lenses like tamron or Sigma etc.., so i think sony is a "cheaper" option in long term, if you buy third party lenses. Canon lenses are crazy expensive. So if you ask me i would buy the sony, because my gear buildt around sony. I have cheap sony lenses and i love them. But if you just compare the specs, the canon looks better, but the lens lineup is not that level, where sony is. But you can check it, maybe i'm wrong. I think if you know where would you use the camera, you can decide which is the perfect for you. For photography it's kind a same. For videography the canon is a little bit better, but i think it's not matter that much. I hope i could help you. Have a nice day 😎
Hey, I'm stuck between Sony A7 II and Sony A6400, I could use some help. I'm mainly going to use it for recording videos and taking pictures (nature, automotive, street and so on)
Hi! I think the a6400 is a better option. You’ll get better autofocus in photo and video too, 120fps in FHD, cheaper lenses, fully tilt up screen. And the a6400 has slightly better battery life. I think the only reason to Pick a7II because it’s fullframe. But in my opinion it doesnt matter. The camera features worth more than the ff sensor. And last the a6400 is compact. I like to use it more than my fullframe, because of the size. So my friend, i highly recommend the a6400 over the a7II. Have a nice day ✌️
Hi... I'm a bit late to this video. But can you please mention the lens that you used for the photo comparison between 6400 and a7iii and the aperture and mm details. Please
Thanks for asking! It was between the a7sIII and the a6400. In the a6400 i used the sigma 16mm f1.4 at f1.4 aperture and in the a7sIII i used the sigma 24-70mm f2.8 at f2.8. It looks kind the same. :D I hope it could help you :) Have a nice day!
Thank you for asking! 🙏I think if you're a photographer, you'll not get any huge upgrade with the a6400, except the autofocus. If you're new with the video side, the a6400 can be a great upgrade, because of the 1080p slow motion capabilities and 4k 30p which looks great. And with the picture profiles, you can increase your dynamic range too. Sony will release a new apsc camera soon, but i think it will be so much more expensive than the a6400. Anyway if you're a beginner, i think you'll not take adventage of the new camera "fancy" features. So i recommend to buy the a6400. But if the money is not a problem and you want a relatively futureproof camera, you can wait for the new one. I said relatively, because i think if you grow as a creator, there is a chance that you'll switch to the FullFrame world. I hope it helps you to decide. Have a nice day! ✌
Hi! I think smaller gimbals are pretty good for the a6400. I use the dji ronin sc. But you can go with zhiyun crane M3 or dji ronin rs3 mini, maybe rsc. Of corse you can go with bigger ones like the dji rs3/rs2, but in my opinion it's an overkill for this tiny camera. Have a nice day ✌
I think its a great starter camera. It never overheats. It has touch focus which makes our lifes easier 😀 anyway the autofocus is crazy good. the battery is okey, not perfect, but its not horrible.
It has great third party lens lineup. And also batteries, but i dont recommend third party battery because once it tightened to my camera and i almost cant remove. So i recommend the original one, i know its more expensive, but its worth the money.
Aloha..a6400 i am having issue with photo/video on outdoor Sunny Day comes out Foggy gray looking scenes...look like it was taken on Cloudy day...how can i chagne/fix tthis to make it cinamatic clear sunny photo/video? Thank You.
Hi! Check your camera settings, i think a picture profile applies on your image. You can see it in the left bottom of your screen PP1 or PP2 etc. It makes that foggy gray image because it increase your camera's dynamic range. (basically you have more informations in the highlight and the shadows) Slog is popular picture profile, but you have to correct it in post. But if you are not familiar with it, you can use pp10, which is "Hybrid Log Gamma" in short HLG and it will gives you good looking image instantly. You can check my video about setting up the a6400 at 11:56s there i'll show you how can you put it to your quick function menu, and if you pinned, you can just set it to pp10: ruclips.net/video/ZtStLFdVa0I/видео.html I think it will solve your problem. I hope it could help. Have a nice day mate! 😎
Thank you for asking! In FullHD the rolling shutter is not bad. Only just in 4k, but in my opinion if you shoot static shots from a tripod, it not that noticable. But sure it has rolling shutter in 4k.
I say it depends on the situation, mostly rolling shutter shows when you make fast pan movements (left to right or reverse), so if you use it with a tripod, it's less noticeable. Also if your camera is not stabilized with a gimbal or stadycam etc.. then the shakes could causes bad jelloy artifacts. I think my music video looks nice however it has some rolling shutter. So I think If you use the camera correctly, it's totally usable. I mean if you using your camera on a gimbal slow push and pulls it works just fine. So it really depends on how you shoot with it. Anyway, if your hand shaky, it looks bad with a much better camera too. If you want to make action movie style hardcore handheld scenes then, yes the rolling shutter can be a limitation. So it's more difficult to make it good. Most of the time, I can live with the rolling shutter, without causing me any trouble, because I know the limitations. But if you want better results, maybe an upgrade could help you. Like an fx30 or a6700 if you stick with apsc crop sensor. Those has less rolling shutter, but sure, you have to pay more for the body.
Depends how you look at it: it may be under-powered for certain tasks, but it's definitely OVER-powered for its size and class. The 6600 isn't that much better, and even the latest gen Sony cameras have shutter-roll and over-heating issues. It shoots great in 1080p, and if also connected to an external recorder, it's all good. It wouldn't hurt Sony too much to release a new firmware though, the lack of support for their "older" gear is the biggest problem with Sony overall
You're right. My a7sIII has the same problem. Sadly sony doesn't give a s*it about camera support even in the higher end models. It works, but it hurts a little bit, when you see a lot of new features in cameras which is so much cheaper.
@@petersroom Just look at the ZV-E10: a lot more toy-ish and cheaper, yet it has some software improvements, just because it's newer. I wouldn't mind the "product showcase" feature and some possibly updated AF definitions on the a6400 (it already has the processing power for them to work). They only released one update, ages ago, for a minor issue, yet they are still making and selling the camera. Your A7IIIS is another great example: all the power is there, but they refuse to bring it up to date by firmware, favouring the newer cheaper models.
Thanks! I appreciate. The people sometimes forget the "old but gold" gear and almost no one makes video about that, because there are the new cameras and features. I try to show that this camera is really good in 2023 too and it has great price and value. Have a nice day ✌
Thank you for asking! I think your camera in PAL settings. Set the camera to NTSC and it will change the base framrates. But be careful, it will format your card, so before save your footage. Have a nice day!
I love and have a6400 but can u tell me when me recording video in lowlight what pp i used slog2 or cine1234? and when me in day light and need dynamic range ? what pp i used for this ? Hlg or other ??
Hi! Thank you for asking! In my opinion you'll get the best dynamic range with slog in sony cameras, but with the a6400 there are some drawbacks to use it. The autofocus performs worse if you're in slog and the colors breaks easier if you try to colorgrade it. So with slog you win some dynamic range, but sacrifice a lot of other functions. HLG is a great solution if you dont really want to colorgrade the footage. Usually i use cine4 with lifted blacks in all situations even in lowlight. I dont really see much differences using pp in lowlight. So if you want to you can turn it off, but i leave in cine4 all the time.
Sure! I changed the pp1 because I don't use it. So I set Black Level +15, Gamma Cine4. Under the Black Gamma: Range wide, Level +7,Knee Mode Auto, Color mode: Pro And leave the rest. In the color grading part you have to correct the saturation and the black level.
im trying to film djs at live events which involves a lot of camera movement (gimbal not suited for my usecase!) and Im really struggling with shakes/jitters in my videos due to the lack of stabilisation! tricks and advise welcome !
Thank you for sharing! It was the same with me. If you shoot handheld a lot, xou should get a camera cage with side and top handle. It could help a lot with the stabilization. If you can afford, you should build a rig with a battery at the end, cause you can make a third contact with the battery if you pull close. Also you can hold the camera easier with just a top handle. I hope it helps ;)
It depends on the situations, most of the time it does not bother me. But there are some situations where it's really annoying. Mostly handheld, run and gun cases.
The A6500 is almost the same as the A6400. It's a great camera too. The a6500 has IBIS, which is good if you dont have stabilised lens like my favorite: sigma 16mm f1.4, so in this way it's better than the a400. The video features almost the same as the a6400, the a6400 has a slightly better autofocus and features like focus tracking, but i think the most of the time you wont see the difference between the two. Both are great. So overall the a6500 is a great camera. Have a nice day! ✌
It depends on the situation. For professional shooting i would go for the a6400. You can change the battery if it's dead and the sd card also. And the noise control also better on the bigger sensor. I only use my Iphone for B or C camera angle. Or quick notes if my main camera is not available. But the Iphone is a really great tool... Just it doesn't match with my workflow. Thank you the question 🙏
Love your perspective - too many people have been trained to believe problems are solved by buying more gear. As a creative professional, I've learned that the best equipment is the always the thing between your ears ;) I'm a 6400 fan too - just subbed - cheers!
Thanks man! I appreciate it 🙏 More gear is not always an option for better production. I have experienced. Have a nice day mate ✌️
Always knew that nose is the best equipment xD
@@daronz ;)
Gear craving never ends and never helps. Very clear and good point mate! Subbed!
Thanks man! I appreciate 🙏
Thanks for this, i've been struggling to chose which camera to get and seeing as i'm just trying to get into videography this really helps me know what is should save up for, thank you so much you've just gained a really appreciative subscriber. Thanks🙏
Thanks! Happy to hear that. Have a nice day! ☺
Peace to you brother, I'm a new study starting with the ax6400.
For some reason when I record in dark places my light isn't coming on😪
Also, lately when I take shots in manual or auto I see a blinkig white lighy. All of these shots are outdoors with Christmas lights in the background.
Thank you for asking! Thats called flicker. If all of the lights blinking than you should switch your camera from NTSC to PAL region or reverse. It causes some flickering. Check your region. I'm in a PAL region so i use it in PAL. Which changes the framerates from 24/60/120 to 25/50/100. Or if you have flickering in photo mode, than turn off the silent shooting mode, cause it causes that horrible lines on your frame. Have a nice day bro! :D
Hi Peter
I am so confused between Canon R10 and sony A6400 which is best for photography and video?? Specially photography which is best for me ??
I have been using NikonD3300 📷 camera since eight years Now I want to be a bit more professional which is best for me ??
Hi! Huh it's a though question. Canon R10 and sony a6400 also a good camera. Not that much difference. I'm a sony guy, but I think between the two maybe the canon R10 a slightly better camera, because of the 4k60p. It has a big crop, but it's a good feature. I think both camera systems are good. In this price range the cameras kind a same. I can recommend the a6400 for photography and videography too. I think it's a solid pick. But keep in mind that the 4k of this camera has a terrible rolling shutter, but for interviews or this kind of shots it's not that much problem. In FHD you can go up to 120fps, so good for slow-motion. I don't want to dig deeper about the specs, because it not matters that much in my opinion. Both the Canon and the Sony has cons and pros. In Sony system you have a lot of third party lenses like Tamron, Sigma, Viltrox, Samyang..etc which is more budget friendly. I'm a sony user, so I recommend the sony more than the Canon. But Canon are also good. So it's a hard question my friend. I hope I was able to give some thoughts for the decision.
@@petersroom Thank You so much 😊
It will help me a lot to buy camera Your thoughts will help me a lot .
For photography, I'd probably go for the Canon. Canon tend to have better looking images straight out of camera. I have an A6400 and I also have a Canon DSLR.
Hi, I really love ur vid about the A6400 and I just wonder, is the A6400 good for astrophotography ?
Hi! Thanks! 🙏 it is. I think combined with a sigma 16mm 1.4 or wider it could be a low light beast. 👌😎
Im more into photography, and i am thinking if Fujifilm X-T30 II or Sony A6400
Hi,
Thinking to buy a6400, but also confused on a6700. The a6700 is out of my budget, and would need to wait atleast 3 4 months more. Also as this will be my first camera, not sure whether I should spend this much money in body alone.
Planning to buy 50mm f1.8 with the a6400. Will use for both photo and video. Waiting for your feedback.
Hi! The a6700 is basically an upgraded a6400 you get bigger battery, In body stabilization, 10bit colors, and 4k 120fps and Ai autofocus. So if you ask me i would recommend the a6700 for long term. For video it's much better than the a6400. You'll grow out the a6400 so fast. I had an a6400 and after 3 years i felt that a little bit weak next to my other comeras. So a6700 more futureproof. But i would pick a more versatile lens than a 50mm f1.8 because it will be so limiting. You know if its a fullframe lens, than you will get a 1.5x crop if you use it on an apsc sensor camera like the a6700 or the a6400. So it will be around 75mm which is not versatile at all. I would go for the sigma 18-50 f2.8 . It's a great budget midrange all rounder lens. You will be thank me, because 50 and 75mm is so tight. You'll feel the tight limitations after a while. And usually people cant buy multiple lenses at first to cover all the focal lenghts. So a good zoom lens is a much better option. It's better to cover a lot of focal lengths (which looks also really good) than master 1 focal length and lose all the others. So if you ask me you should be a little bit patient. It will be much better in long term. I waited almost 2 years to get my bigger sony camera, and it worth every penny.
@@petersroom thanks man for your detailed advice. Will surely help a lot.
However, as I am a hobbyist photographer, won't be able to make money from it .
Also considering a6600 now, if not a6700 due to the Ibis, let's see..
Hi Peter, loving your content. I picked up the A6400 about 3 weeks ago, and I'm slowly trying to build up my gear as well. Also a growing youtuber, hopefully things go well haha. Subscribed to your channel, can't wait for the next video man.
Thanks man!🙏 I really appreciate. For youtube i think tha a6400 is a perfect choice. It will serve you many years. I hope your channel will do well, keep it up. Have a nice day! ✌
@@petersroom hi! Is it good to buy this camera for travel? Esthetics video with sunset etc
@@violettamae9388 Hi! I think this camera is an excellent choice for travel video/photo. The compact form factor, the price and the overall performance is very good. The lenses are so much cheaper than the fullframe ones and there are some third party lenses which is cheaper and works kind a same, or maybe better, than the native sony lenses. So i can recommend it for traveling. Have a nice day! ✌
Currently in the market for my first camera and the A6400 hits all the right spots. Especially with the vast lens eco system Sony and the other brands have created for the E mount!
I love E-mount. There are a lot of saturation of lens choices.
I'm looking for an apsc crop sensor camera for both photography and videography..is a6400 still good??
The a6400 is one of the best price-value camera in the market right now.
@@petersroom Thanks. But between a6400 and zve10 ii which one will u suggest?
Such a bummer that I got this camera after watching many reviews and primarily wanted to use it for vlogging. The results are nauseating.
The work around for the shakes is S&Q and getting a gimbal.
Thank you for sharing! I dont know how S&Q help with the shakes. If you mean slow motion, than you only have slowmo in FullHD (in the a6400) and i usually work in 4k..but sure it's just a preference. Yes, the gimbal could help..if you could bring one with you. I have 2 gimbals, so it would be logical to bring one of them with me. But when you're for example in a trip with you wife or with your friends, there is a chance you don't want to bring a gimbal to a plane and walk around in the city all day with your expensive toy... especially if you are for example bigger cities where there are many robbers. And if you're a hybrid shooter like me, than the gimbal could be a big problem. So overall, yes... the gimbal could help you, but not all the time it's the best solution.
Really cool, the camera doesnt take a photo or video, the people does :D thanks, now im motivated to buy this a6400
Thanks! I think the a6400 is still one of the best camera to jump into the sony ecosystem. I sold mine, because i had to upgrade and couldnt afford a third camera.. but i miss it so much. Sometimes i thought that i save some money and buy one again.
Hey, already subbed! Just bought the 6400 and looking to make cinematic footage and i'm confused which is the best picture profile (heard the s-log2 is not recommended for this camera)
Thanks man! I appreciate🙏 I'll make a video about the picture profiles, but here is the short answer. If you dont know much about colorgrade, i recommend the HLG pp which is the [pp10] on your a6400. You'll get good amount of dynamic range. If you want to play with colorgrade, try the Cine4. I made a custom pp to my pp1 slot. These are the settings: blacklevel +15, Gamut: Cine4. Colormode: Pro. Everything else is 0 or not changed. It lifts shadows a little bit so you have to correct at the editing part. I mostly use this Cine4, because it does not compress that much like the slog so the image won't fall apart, because of the 8-bit. And you'll get better dynamic range than HLG. But i think You can give a shot to slog-2, I think if you just correct the image (contrast,exposure) you won't see any difference. In the editing part, if you try to pull the colors, you can notice that some point the colors starts to fall apart. So ifyou dont want to go deeper and if you want instantly good image pick the HLG on pp10. Have a nice day! ✌
💫You are amazing man you reply to all comments no youtube channel behaves like this congrats to you 👏
Thanks! I know that it is often difficult to find information, so I always try to answer when people ask. Have a nice day mate! ✌️
Can I purchase alpha 6400 as it's a 4 year old camera? Dose it make any difference as day by day technology advances.
If you want a beginner budget sony apsc camera, i think this is the best choice. The zv-e10 is kind a same, but i like more the a6400 body. New sony apsc cameras will announce soon, but i think it'll be more expensive than the a6400. You know it depends on what you want to make with the camera. I can recommend it for taking pictures for social media and you can make pretty good videos for youtube. So it's a great hybrid camera if you have just started. And yes there are new features, but i think it doesn't matter that much. I like 10bit footage, but its not must have. I like 4k60, but i can live without. In the end you'll see that if you can't do good photos or videos with the a6400 you'll not able to do with a "better" camera like fx30 or with the higher end models. Nowadays i also use my a6400 for making content and i also have the a7sIII. I use a7sIII instead of the a6400 where the a6400 is not too good, like in the fast pased shots (because of the rolling shutter). So i can recommend it, and after a while you'll be very confident with the a camera and you'll feel the limitations. Then you can step up to a more advanced camera, and you can appreciate the new features which you missed from the previous one. I hope I was able to help you choose.
@@petersroom thank you, really appreciate the time you took to tell this in detail. I bought a6400 and am happy wit it now 🥰.
Nice! 👍 I'm happy to hear that. Enjoy 🙏😎
sir please help me my confusion
upgrade my a6400 to full frame
or upgrade my lenses of my a6400
which investment is good for me 😢
Hey! Thank you for asking. It depends on your needs. You have to know that what are you missing from the a6400. If the fullframe can help with that, buy a fullframe. But keep in mind, that in the fullframe world, everything is more expensive. I could buy 3 apsc lenses of the cost of my 1 fullframe lens. I think if you shoot stills for social media, the FF doesnt matter that much. The fullframe sensor helps you to push the boundaries out, because its better in low light, or the dynamic range is better. But I think it's not that much upgrade. If i show you 2 pictures, one made by a6400 and the other one by with a FF camera, you can't tell the difference. I think if i were you I would pick apsc lenses to make you're versatility better instead of jumping into the FF world. Anyway, if you don't know if FF would be a good investment, then still, APSC is a perfectly good choice. But you can try a fullframe camera. You can rent it for 1 day, its not that pricy, and you can see the results. Have a nice day mate 🙌
@@petersroom thank u sir.😍
Perfect video for new photographers. The best camera is the one you have or one you can afford to have! Subbed 😊
Thanks! I apreciate ☺️🙏
Hi bro for weeding video shoot which lens is good for a6400?
@@ayushbhj6609 hi! I recommend at least two lenses. The sony 18-105 f4 for the entire day and the sigma 16mm for the evening indoor shots. 😎🤘
@@petersroom thanks man
Can you suggest me a camera to buy my main reason to buy a camera is for making a Short film and I need a camera which is budget friendly so can you please help
Hey! I think for starting out the a6400 / zv-e10 could be the best budget option. With some zoom lens like the sigma 18-50 f2.8. If you have more budget, the next level is the a6700 /zv-e10 mark II. I prefer the a6700 because of the optical stabilisation and "better body". These cameras are insane good. you get 4k 10bit even in slowmotion. And the budget professional choice is the fx30. It has fans, so it will not overheat on you. But the a6700 also won't overheat if you use properly. (don't shoot 120fps 1 hour straight) I hope it helps bro :D
Can you please suggest me between sony a6400 vs fujifilm xs10
I think its not about buying the camera its about picking the ecosystem. Because when you buy one of them you will invest into a brand. I like better the sony so i would 100% go with the a6400. You will get a lot of lens options and great autofocus etc… its really reliable. 😎👌
Can i get rolling shutter in 1080p also?
I'm really confused between zve10 and a6400
Can you please tell who is the clear winner in this two
I'm more into filmmaking
Hi mate! Yes you have some rolling shutter in 1080p too, but it's so much better. The zv-e10 and the a6400 are kind the same. Same sensor, samer video codecs, etc.. The main differences between the two is the body. The body of the a6400 is a little bit bulkier, you have more buttons to customize and a little bit more comfortable. The zv-e10 has some extra features, like the fully articulated screen and active stabilization while the a6400 lacks of any stabilization. I think for filmmaking the zv-e10 is a little bit better, because of the articulating screen and the active stabilization. Have a nice day! :D
Do you have any dead pixels on your viewfinder for the A6400?
Thank you for asking! No i dont have any dead pixels.
Nope
I'm beginner. I'm confused either Canon M50 mark ii or Sony A6400.
I mostly wanna focus on taking pictures like potrait and scenery, and maybe for fun video.
I really need help and also a little bit details on it cause I'm not really have many knowledge about camera
I dont know exactly the canon system, but overall i like more the sony system. I show the a6400 advantages over the canon M50.
1.) The sony a6400 has a lot of picture profiles, which is great if you want to make a little bit more professional videos. (the picture profiles adds more dynamic range to your cameras, so you can protect more the highlights and the shadows on your pictures. Almost every professional camera has picture profiles). The Canon does not have professional picture profiles or kind a same like the sony (S-log, cine, HLG). (as far as i know)
2) The a6400 has better buildt body, which is great, because when you shoot, the grip is much more comfortable than the M50. My friend had M50 and i dont like the grip, its to small to my big hands.
3) With sony you have awesome budget third party lenses like: Tamron, Sigma, Viltrox, Samyang, laowa. So you can choose between a lot of lens, which is not that pricy.
4) The autofocus is so great in the a6400. You have eye autofocus in photography and face autofocus in video mode. You have touch creen and when you touch somewhere, the focus goes there. And you have great track focus too.
5) You can record in 4k 25/30 fps which looks awesome. The camera oversamples from 6k and compress down to 4k. I think it looks cool. And the a6400 is not overheat, so you can record until your batteries die.
6) For taking pictures it's also a very good camera. You can check my pictures on my street photography videos. Easy to use and looks stunning.
So overall i think for beginners the a6400 is a great choice, in my opinion its better than the M50. But it's my preference. I recommend the a6400.
I hope I was able to help you make a decision. If you have some questions, you can ask anytime. Have a nice day! ✌
the a6400 is great for photos
Can i rely on sony a6400 for weeding video and hardwork ?
Thanks for asking. I think yes. I've shot several weddings with the a6400 (even on a completely sunny day) and it works great. There are two downsides to this camera. I recommend shooting in FHD instead of 4k for weddings because 4k doesn't look good with the rolling shutter. And most of the time I like to shoot in 60p, because it is possible to slow down the recording. The second issue is battery life. But I managed it with a power bank and chargers. I have 3 batteries and if I use one, the other two can be charged. But the image quality in fullHD is fine in my opinion, but there is not so much room for cropping, so you have to frame it correctly. If you have just started, I can also recommend it for a weddings. If you have some questions, feel free to ask. Have a nice day 😀
A6400 wedding videos and photoshoot possible? More than people told same Science a7 mark3..? Pls explain bro
Thank you for asking! Sure. I made weddings and corporate photoshoots too with the a6400 and i didnt have any problem with the camera capabilities. The only thing that i want to mention is that you have to change batteries more often than the a7III. I only recommend the original Sony batteries. You’ll be grateful. So if you’re beginner i can recommend this camera. I started to make weddings with a6400 and 18-105 f4 during the day and some primes when the sun goes down. The science means the “color science”, which means how the camera renders the color tones. Sony always has some colder color science, sometimes the human skin looks a little bit purple instead of the natural skincolor. With the newer science the skin and the colors overall looks more natural and pleasing straight out of the camera. So in the a6400 you’ll get better science. The same as the a7III. And the a6400 has better autofocus features than the a7III. Dont worry to get this little boy. ✌️
@@petersroom You are amazing man you reply to all comments no youtube channel behaves like this congrats to you 👏
@@dj-kj2zr Thanks man! I really appreciate 🙏
@@petersroom how to take high pixels photos pls told me...
@@dj-kj2zr I think high pixel is not the key if you want sharp images. I can make razor sharp images only with 12megapixel and i can make washed out pictures with 24mp or 33mp. 1) You need enough and good quality light 2) good focus and aperture 3) sharp lens 4) High shutter speed. But there are some advanced technique to achieve more resolution. 1) stack your images 2) increse the resolution digitally but the resolution does not mean that you picture will "POP". You can make an image shot by with your phone looks dope, if you know masking and colorgrading. I think you have to shape your light with masks to pull the viewers attention to a specific point. And if you can use contrast well your image looks so much sharper. I have one lightroom tutorial, where i use masks: ruclips.net/video/l1p-rVVUkho/видео.html
Nice guy. Big hug from Brazil!
Thanks! 🙌
Nagyon szemezek ezzel a géppel :D LumixG80-ról leválva
Én nagyon szerettem ezt a kamerát. Szerintem nagyon jó belépő a sony rendszerbe. 😎
I want to buy my first camera (mainly for videos but also for photos) and I was thinking about a6400. but I would prefer to use a camera without the gimbal. Is it possible or would you go for a different camera?
Thank you for asking! Yes i can recommend this camera. It's perfect for photography. I really liked it. In video, there are some workarounds to make stable footage. You can pick stabilised lenses, those could help you a lot in handheld situations. You can rig it up with smallrig cage and a top handle, that could also help a lot with that extra contact point. But if you want in body stabilization, (which stacks with the lens stabilization) there is the new a6700 or the older a6600 which has the same sensor as the a6400. But i would go for the a6700 instead of the a6600. It's performing much better in video and it has all the fancy new Ai focus features. But if you want to stay budget, i recommend the a6400. Have a nice day mate!
Hi am from kerala❤️I have a doubt.. 50 mm 1.8 lens is suitable for 6400 for good photography?
You’re welcome ☺️ it depends on what you shoot. For portraits the 50mm 1.8 is good. If you mean FE 50mm f1.8. Its around 75mm on crop sensor. But if you want wide shots too, it will be tight. What do you want to shoot?
@@petersroom just portrait..i have confused btwn sony 6400 and canon R, 50
will you suggest purchasing sony a6400 over canon R10? in 2023
Thank you for asking! I'm a sony boy, so i know better the sony advanteges than canon. But i think the r10 a slightly better camera. You have 4k60p. Its a choice between the sony or canon. If you would like to invest to a camera system, i think you'll be stick to it. Cause after a while you'll buy new lenses etc.. I like the sony because of the third party lenses like tamron or Sigma etc.., so i think sony is a "cheaper" option in long term, if you buy third party lenses. Canon lenses are crazy expensive. So if you ask me i would buy the sony, because my gear buildt around sony. I have cheap sony lenses and i love them. But if you just compare the specs, the canon looks better, but the lens lineup is not that level, where sony is. But you can check it, maybe i'm wrong. I think if you know where would you use the camera, you can decide which is the perfect for you. For photography it's kind a same. For videography the canon is a little bit better, but i think it's not matter that much. I hope i could help you. Have a nice day 😎
Hey, I'm stuck between Sony A7 II and Sony A6400, I could use some help. I'm mainly going to use it for recording videos and taking pictures (nature, automotive, street and so on)
Hi! I think the a6400 is a better option. You’ll get better autofocus in photo and video too, 120fps in FHD, cheaper lenses, fully tilt up screen. And the a6400 has slightly better battery life. I think the only reason to Pick a7II because it’s fullframe. But in my opinion it doesnt matter. The camera features worth more than the ff sensor. And last the a6400 is compact. I like to use it more than my fullframe, because of the size. So my friend, i highly recommend the a6400 over the a7II. Have a nice day ✌️
@@petersroom thank you really much, I appreciate your suggestion
Hi... I'm a bit late to this video. But can you please mention the lens that you used for the photo comparison between 6400 and a7iii and the aperture and mm details. Please
Thanks for asking! It was between the a7sIII and the a6400. In the a6400 i used the sigma 16mm f1.4 at f1.4 aperture and in the a7sIII i used the sigma 24-70mm f2.8 at f2.8. It looks kind the same. :D I hope it could help you :) Have a nice day!
I have a6000 should i keep it or upgrade to a6400 or wait for next gen cameras?
Thank you for asking! 🙏I think if you're a photographer, you'll not get any huge upgrade with the a6400, except the autofocus. If you're new with the video side, the a6400 can be a great upgrade, because of the 1080p slow motion capabilities and 4k 30p which looks great. And with the picture profiles, you can increase your dynamic range too. Sony will release a new apsc camera soon, but i think it will be so much more expensive than the a6400. Anyway if you're a beginner, i think you'll not take adventage of the new camera "fancy" features. So i recommend to buy the a6400. But if the money is not a problem and you want a relatively futureproof camera, you can wait for the new one. I said relatively, because i think if you grow as a creator, there is a chance that you'll switch to the FullFrame world. I hope it helps you to decide. Have a nice day! ✌
Need sony 6400 basic camera setup video please please make it in-depth and descriptive
I'll make a camera settings in depth tutorial for photography and video too. Have a nice day😎
Bought this camera great camera I'm glad that i choose this
Nice! It’s a little workhorse. Enjoy 😎thank you for sharing! 🙌
Hey Peter, what should I use for video stabilization in my a6400?
Hi! I think smaller gimbals are pretty good for the a6400. I use the dji ronin sc. But you can go with zhiyun crane M3 or dji ronin rs3 mini, maybe rsc. Of corse you can go with bigger ones like the dji rs3/rs2, but in my opinion it's an overkill for this tiny camera. Have a nice day ✌
Is it good for beginners
Battery is good
Any heating issue are there
No touch screen so difficult to use for beginners
Last im a beginner😁
I think its a great starter camera. It never overheats. It has touch focus which makes our lifes easier 😀 anyway the autofocus is crazy good. the battery is okey, not perfect, but its not horrible.
@@petersroom thanku man love from kerala... ❤ third party lens and battery will support..?
Sonya6400 or canon r10
It has great third party lens lineup. And also batteries, but i dont recommend third party battery because once it tightened to my camera and i almost cant remove. So i recommend the original one, i know its more expensive, but its worth the money.
Its more chosing an ecosystem instead of camera. I would pick the sony 😀 im a sony fan
Aloha..a6400 i am having issue with photo/video on outdoor Sunny Day comes out Foggy gray looking scenes...look like it was taken on Cloudy day...how can i chagne/fix tthis to make it cinamatic clear sunny photo/video? Thank You.
Hi! Check your camera settings, i think a picture profile applies on your image. You can see it in the left bottom of your screen PP1 or PP2 etc. It makes that foggy gray image because it increase your camera's dynamic range. (basically you have more informations in the highlight and the shadows) Slog is popular picture profile, but you have to correct it in post. But if you are not familiar with it, you can use pp10, which is "Hybrid Log Gamma" in short HLG and it will gives you good looking image instantly. You can check my video about setting up the a6400 at 11:56s there i'll show you how can you put it to your quick function menu, and if you pinned, you can just set it to pp10: ruclips.net/video/ZtStLFdVa0I/видео.html I think it will solve your problem. I hope it could help. Have a nice day mate! 😎
i want to shoot dance videos. dance videos include fast moves. i don't know will there be rolling shutter or not like the sticks you have shown
Thank you for asking! In FullHD the rolling shutter is not bad. Only just in 4k, but in my opinion if you shoot static shots from a tripod, it not that noticable. But sure it has rolling shutter in 4k.
means hard to capture fast dance moves in 4k@@petersroom
I say it depends on the situation, mostly rolling shutter shows when you make fast pan movements (left to right or reverse), so if you use it with a tripod, it's less noticeable. Also if your camera is not stabilized with a gimbal or stadycam etc.. then the shakes could causes bad jelloy artifacts. I think my music video looks nice however it has some rolling shutter. So I think If you use the camera correctly, it's totally usable. I mean if you using your camera on a gimbal slow push and pulls it works just fine. So it really depends on how you shoot with it. Anyway, if your hand shaky, it looks bad with a much better camera too. If you want to make action movie style hardcore handheld scenes then, yes the rolling shutter can be a limitation. So it's more difficult to make it good. Most of the time, I can live with the rolling shutter, without causing me any trouble, because I know the limitations. But if you want better results, maybe an upgrade could help you. Like an fx30 or a6700 if you stick with apsc crop sensor. Those has less rolling shutter, but sure, you have to pay more for the body.
thankyou sir. thankyouvery much@@petersroom
Depends how you look at it: it may be under-powered for certain tasks, but it's definitely OVER-powered for its size and class. The 6600 isn't that much better, and even the latest gen Sony cameras have shutter-roll and over-heating issues. It shoots great in 1080p, and if also connected to an external recorder, it's all good. It wouldn't hurt Sony too much to release a new firmware though, the lack of support for their "older" gear is the biggest problem with Sony overall
You're right. My a7sIII has the same problem. Sadly sony doesn't give a s*it about camera support even in the higher end models. It works, but it hurts a little bit, when you see a lot of new features in cameras which is so much cheaper.
@@petersroom Just look at the ZV-E10: a lot more toy-ish and cheaper, yet it has some software improvements, just because it's newer. I wouldn't mind the "product showcase" feature and some possibly updated AF definitions on the a6400 (it already has the processing power for them to work). They only released one update, ages ago, for a minor issue, yet they are still making and selling the camera. Your A7IIIS is another great example: all the power is there, but they refuse to bring it up to date by firmware, favouring the newer cheaper models.
please give me tips for my sony a6000 handheld shoots
Thank you for asking! For photography or filmmaking?
@@petersroom film making sir
I recommend to use a neckstrap for handheld shots, because it can help you if you stretch it.
Keep doing a6400 videos! Good content 👌
Thanks! I appreciate. The people sometimes forget the "old but gold" gear and almost no one makes video about that, because there are the new cameras and features. I try to show that this camera is really good in 2023 too and it has great price and value. Have a nice day ✌
How do I get 30fps for video? I see 25 50 100 but want 30
Thank you for asking! I think your camera in PAL settings. Set the camera to NTSC and it will change the base framrates. But be careful, it will format your card, so before save your footage. Have a nice day!
I love and have a6400 but can u tell me when me recording video in lowlight what pp i used slog2 or cine1234? and when me in day light and need dynamic range ? what pp i used for this ? Hlg or other ??
Hi! Thank you for asking! In my opinion you'll get the best dynamic range with slog in sony cameras, but with the a6400 there are some drawbacks to use it. The autofocus performs worse if you're in slog and the colors breaks easier if you try to colorgrade it. So with slog you win some dynamic range, but sacrifice a lot of other functions. HLG is a great solution if you dont really want to colorgrade the footage. Usually i use cine4 with lifted blacks in all situations even in lowlight. I dont really see much differences using pp in lowlight. So if you want to you can turn it off, but i leave in cine4 all the time.
can u tell me cine4 setting ?@@petersroom
Sure! I changed the pp1 because I don't use it. So I set Black Level +15, Gamma Cine4. Under the Black Gamma: Range wide, Level +7,Knee Mode Auto, Color mode: Pro And leave the rest. In the color grading part you have to correct the saturation and the black level.
thanks my bro this need color grade or not or change color if i won't ? @@petersroom
This setting needs a little correction. But it's easy. If you play with the contrast and add some saturation you'll be fine.
im trying to film djs at live events which involves a lot of camera movement (gimbal not suited for my usecase!) and Im really struggling with shakes/jitters in my videos due to the lack of stabilisation! tricks and advise welcome !
Thank you for sharing! It was the same with me. If you shoot handheld a lot, xou should get a camera cage with side and top handle. It could help a lot with the stabilization. If you can afford, you should build a rig with a battery at the end, cause you can make a third contact with the battery if you pull close. Also you can hold the camera easier with just a top handle. I hope it helps ;)
great. thank you
Thanks! I appreciate 🙏
The rolling shutter does hold me back a lot unfortunately
It depends on the situations, most of the time it does not bother me. But there are some situations where it's really annoying. Mostly handheld, run and gun cases.
I'm thinking about getting this camera so thanks for sharing this! New sub👍🏼out here supporting smaller channels like mine!
Thanks bro! I appreciate 🙏 i checked your channel and i think its great, so i subscribed. Have a nice day ✌️
How about the A6500?
The A6500 is almost the same as the A6400. It's a great camera too. The a6500 has IBIS, which is good if you dont have stabilised lens like my favorite: sigma 16mm f1.4, so in this way it's better than the a400. The video features almost the same as the a6400, the a6400 has a slightly better autofocus and features like focus tracking, but i think the most of the time you wont see the difference between the two. Both are great. So overall the a6500 is a great camera. Have a nice day! ✌
rolling shutter is a side effect of a cmos censor
Sadly yes, but its still produce really great images 🤘😎
My camera vantage prblm pls reply me images not sharply
Hi! What is the problem with your camera?
Hi...how is the jpeg?
Hi! Which jpeg? I don't really use jpeg-s. I only shoot in RAW. Its so much better in my opinion.
15 pro max or A6400??\
It depends on the situation. For professional shooting i would go for the a6400. You can change the battery if it's dead and the sd card also. And the noise control also better on the bigger sensor. I only use my Iphone for B or C camera angle. Or quick notes if my main camera is not available. But the Iphone is a really great tool... Just it doesn't match with my workflow. Thank you the question 🙏
The crop sensor will tell you it’s B
I’m not sure what does it mean 😀
i also have sonya6400 🥳🥳
It's a really nice camera! Congratulations 😎🙌
You're hilarious!
Ty!
Okay waiting on if it’s worth it 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Yes 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I have a lot of projects currently, but if I have some time I'll do it. 😀 Have a nice day ✌️