@ 1:20 Full throttle with the Outlander and very carefully with RAV??? This not a goo test at all. Not the same location and not done by the same driver. One driver floors it and the other gives careful acceleration.
There is no flooring in the tests, speed up to 25 km/h. We are looking for the best throttle level which is different in different cars. Mitsubishi needs more. And I don't see any connection between location and result of the test.
@@valdius85 If you consider extreme values - means 3x0% and 1x100% then no. But if these values are less extreme, then yeap, can happen: ruclips.net/video/R_mf-y8lIRw/видео.html
As for Mitsu - this is usual Mitsu AWC... The US, South America, and CIS versions at the top level are bundled with S-AWC, which easily deals with the last test. Unfortunately, in EU it is mostly unavailable for Outlander (but Eclipse Cross has it)
has nothing to do with it, limited slip diff has enough torque on the front with 3 rollers (at least the mitsubishi) but not on the back (I'm guessing because the rear is lighter)
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
I personally think this test was not really "fair". The driver of the Mitsubishi floored it once while the driver of the Toyota actually gently pushed/pumped the gas pedal instead of flooring it AND the driver of the Toyota actually turned the handle from left and right so it helps it get over the rollers. Meanwhile the driver of the Mitsubishi just went straight and floored it. The Toyota had a higher chance and the tests were not really "equal" because of this.
There is no flooring in these tests, max speed is about 25 km/h. Mitsubishi cars usually need more throttle to engage traction control to work. When it comes to steering wheel - it is explained here: ruclips.net/video/O1mEqyU9KDo/видео.html
@@justcustom110 That idiot driver in Mitsubishi was much smarter than you. And unlike you, he knew how the TC works in these cars. I don't know which Outlander you have, if not the newest one, then take the owners manual and read it. It clearly says that the TC requires a speed of at least 15 km/h to react (it starts working effectively from 20 km/h). I drove more than 150 000 kilometers with the ASX, so I know exactly how it works. You can find on my channel old tests of ASX, with additional camera view of the speedometer and tachometer, tests up to 15 km/h and above 15 km/h.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers I did not mean gassing the pedal all the way to the floorboard of the car by "flooring it". The toyota driver was a bit more "gentle/easier" on the gas pedal. We have the 2020 AWC PHev outlander. Is the AWC system different/improved than the 2019/2018 models?
@@cheez1012 As far as I am concerned, Mitsubishi made major software update for latest PHEV. Previously it wasn't tuned well for traction, rather for handling only: ruclips.net/video/swXwSQoToj4/видео.html
I do not quite get why you test both right wheels without traction and then also front right and rear left. These two tests are in principle the same, always one wheel on each axle.
Lol Rav4 much better looking then boat Outlander. These are both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
+0O0O0 - Mitsubishi Outlander is safer than Toyota RAV4, but if you want the best in safety (which is also the best in AWD), your choice is neither: ruclips.net/video/E41b2pQVjX4/видео.html ruclips.net/video/fThvc24xbUY/видео.html ruclips.net/video/p_nukPBl1J8/видео.html
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
what happened to you..Mitsubishi?...you used to be the king of 4wd, and styling, the RAV4 looks even more incredible after looking at your sad effort of styling the Outlander. I hope u build the Tourer , and keep your brand, as a new Montero..!
@Gerard Ferry yes, Super, or intelligent...most awd systems have the technology to transfer power away from the spinning wheel and to the other side. It is an old technology. But Mitsubishi and Subaru know awd and turbos. Next!
@@SilentWarriorEU Rzeszów. Byliśmy na testach w Warszawie tydzień temu, będziemy też pewnie w sierpniu. Niestety nie stać nas na wypożyczanie samochodów. Chyba, że wypożyczalnia zgodzi się udostępnić auto na ich parkingu w zamian za reklamę na filmie, tak kiedyś dogadaliśmy się z siecią wypożyczalni express.pl :)
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
Such a stupid comment to make but I can't stand the way the guy in the Rav 4 drove off the rollers.. Either drove to far and drove over them or stopped on them lol. Guy realizes he doesn't have to run into something before he stops right?
They have 3 kind of awd on the 2019 Toyota rav4 , you should try the hybrid version with the électric awd and the Trail edition with the dynamic torc vectoring system 😉
Rav4 with Dynamic Torque All Wheel Drive is not available in my country. Just like Outlander with S-AWC. Hybrid Rav4 is here: ruclips.net/video/cJeFOLc_0Sw/видео.html
electric isn't very good with rear roller because electric just shoots torque unrelated to front wheel diff. and spins away uselessly while front has underpowered light gasoline engine technically 2wd open diff it's great for road and city uses but real offroad forget electric plus Dynamic torque is just pre-setup AWD behavior rather than, on the fly computer directed
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
@@jacekplacek9776 W Piotrkowie dwa samochody czekają już na test, więc wkrótce postaramy się przyjechać. Podeślij jakieś namiary na siebie przez nasz profil na FB.
Yes much better then a Toyota 4Runner or Jeep 😂 This outlander is an average AWD system. Much better systems out there, including 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
+abuomar abuomar - Are you sure? ruclips.net/video/O1tPIOeVvVU/видео.html ruclips.net/video/O48gTNBpXak/видео.html ruclips.net/video/SCbraJIvtGg/видео.html ruclips.net/video/tKu2NAIOe3M/видео.html
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
An interesting test. Thanks for sharing!
Спасибо за честность...
Was hoping the Outlander would pass the 1 rear wheel test, especially on 4WD LOCK.
Interesting to see that lock really isn't a diff lock! Probably sending power equally to four wheels tho...
@@LocoMe4u LOCK is a function of front/rear torque distribution. It is not a locker but more aggresive algorithms setup for awd clutch-pack.
Same result for both cars. here LOCK does not mean LOCK at all. It is a light LOCK. Thanks for the video!
Lock is more aggressive setup of awd system. It is not a locker.
It locks 50/50 front and rear split.
@@keyner111It locks the system into permanent awd but torque split remains variable.
@@keyner111Did you delete the comment about AWC and S-AWC? I see the notification but no comment.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers yep, I deleted it.
Both did well. Both do well on trails.
@4:13 rav4 failed on the 3 roller
@ 1:20 Full throttle with the Outlander and very carefully with RAV???
This not a goo test at all. Not the same location and not done by the same driver. One driver floors it and the other gives careful acceleration.
There is no flooring in the tests, speed up to 25 km/h. We are looking for the best throttle level which is different in different cars. Mitsubishi needs more. And I don't see any connection between location and result of the test.
Good comparison! I am really keen on Outlander but last test is just big time fail... In summary - both awd systems are disappointing ...
Thanks! Luckily the last test (and the last but one) doesn't really matter in real life conditions 🙂
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers I was wondering - is there any edge case scenario where only one wheel would have traction and the rest zero traction?
@@valdius85 If you consider extreme values - means 3x0% and 1x100% then no. But if these values are less extreme, then yeap, can happen: ruclips.net/video/R_mf-y8lIRw/видео.html
As for Mitsu - this is usual Mitsu AWC... The US, South America, and CIS versions at the top level are bundled with S-AWC, which easily deals with the last test. Unfortunately, in EU it is mostly unavailable for Outlander (but Eclipse Cross has it)
Great example. Thank you ;)
Have you tried also with the turned off ESC?
Yes, you can find it on my channel in some other tests of the same Outlander.
has nothing to do with it, limited slip diff has enough torque on the front with 3 rollers (at least the mitsubishi) but not on the back (I'm guessing because the rear is lighter)
Surprise surprise... the Mitsubishi is doing better than the RAV4.
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
Outlander won. Would like to see S-AWC in this test
There is a test of Outlander with S-AWC on my channel, check it out 🙂
Toyota was 2WD and now it is 3WD.
Big progress far behind competitors.
Others had 4WD 10 years ago.
Igor if you consider the previous hybrid model, was even a 1WD
OOF both front wheels and a back wheel on the rollers and it's over! very interesting
That's standard result for majority of such vehicles.
I personally think this test was not really "fair". The driver of the Mitsubishi floored it once while the driver of the Toyota actually gently pushed/pumped the gas pedal instead of flooring it AND the driver of the Toyota actually turned the handle from left and right so it helps it get over the rollers. Meanwhile the driver of the Mitsubishi just went straight and floored it. The Toyota had a higher chance and the tests were not really "equal" because of this.
There is no flooring in these tests, max speed is about 25 km/h. Mitsubishi cars usually need more throttle to engage traction control to work. When it comes to steering wheel - it is explained here: ruclips.net/video/O1mEqyU9KDo/видео.html
@@justcustom110 That idiot driver in Mitsubishi was much smarter than you. And unlike you, he knew how the TC works in these cars. I don't know which Outlander you have, if not the newest one, then take the owners manual and read it. It clearly says that the TC requires a speed of at least 15 km/h to react (it starts working effectively from 20 km/h). I drove more than 150 000 kilometers with the ASX, so I know exactly how it works. You can find on my channel old tests of ASX, with additional camera view of the speedometer and tachometer, tests up to 15 km/h and above 15 km/h.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers I did not mean gassing the pedal all the way to the floorboard of the car by "flooring it". The toyota driver was a bit more "gentle/easier" on the gas pedal. We have the 2020 AWC PHev outlander. Is the AWC system different/improved than the 2019/2018 models?
@@cheez1012 As far as I am concerned, Mitsubishi made major software update for latest PHEV. Previously it wasn't tuned well for traction, rather for handling only: ruclips.net/video/swXwSQoToj4/видео.html
I do not quite get why you test both right wheels without traction and then also front right and rear left. These two tests are in principle the same, always one wheel on each axle.
Tests are in principle the same, but sometimes awd systems react different.
On the outlander there just full accelerating but on the Toyota they only lightly accelerate to make it seem like a better car
There is no full acceleration in any tests. Both cars got the same result.
Great video. What is the ground clearance of these two vehicles.?
Would it be possible to do this same test with the RAV4 hybrid and outlander phev .
Thanks. Unfortunately I don't know the ground clearance.
When it comes to Rav4 Hybrid and Outlander PHEV - you can find these tests on my channel.
RAV4 hibrid is 2WD
@@rusMusDie not the 2020 2021 and 2022 models they have AWD
Chciał bym zobaczyć porównanie mitsubishi pajero i Toyota Land cruiser 😉
Spróbujemy coś takiego zorganizować 🙂
Not only outlander looks better and cheaper, it is much more safer. That ugly new rav4 is epic fail.
Lol Rav4 much better looking then boat Outlander. These are both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
+0O0O0
- Mitsubishi Outlander is safer than Toyota RAV4, but if you want the best in safety (which is also the best in AWD), your choice is neither:
ruclips.net/video/E41b2pQVjX4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/fThvc24xbUY/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/p_nukPBl1J8/видео.html
Would love to see how the Range Rover Evoque and Velar perform in this...
Discovery 4 coming next :-)
Outlander👍
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
伊間式真 - Both fail.
what happened to you..Mitsubishi?...you used to be the king of 4wd, and styling, the RAV4 looks even more incredible after looking at your sad effort of styling the Outlander. I hope u build the Tourer , and keep your brand, as a new Montero..!
@Gerard Ferry yes, Super, or intelligent...most awd systems have the technology to transfer power away from the spinning wheel and to the other side. It is an old technology. But Mitsubishi and Subaru know awd and turbos. Next!
MITSUBISHI DELICA D:5 ｖｓ TOYOTA LAND CRUISER PRADO ？人
please test outlander phev 2019
Unfortunately 2019 PHEV is not available in my country.
Well the driving technique was quite different between the two cars....
Driving technique counts up to the point when system takes over the control, so actually up to the point of slippage detection.
Nissan X-trail tests please...
Thank you
Still looking for a volunteer...
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Nissan X-Trail vs Mitsubishi Outlander would be cool!
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers w Warszawie jedna wypozyczalnia ma X-Traila, bo jezdzilem nim... A Wy skad jestes(cie) ?
@@SilentWarriorEU Rzeszów. Byliśmy na testach w Warszawie tydzień temu, będziemy też pewnie w sierpniu. Niestety nie stać nas na wypożyczanie samochodów. Chyba, że wypożyczalnia zgodzi się udostępnić auto na ich parkingu w zamian za reklamę na filmie, tak kiedyś dogadaliśmy się z siecią wypożyczalni express.pl :)
Outlander wins !
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
+gabojam - Both fail
the non hybrid rav4 awd system is better
Such a stupid comment to make but I can't stand the way the guy in the Rav 4 drove off the rollers.. Either drove to far and drove over them or stopped on them lol. Guy realizes he doesn't have to run into something before he stops right?
That's what happens when I don't inform the drivers to stop immediately after leaving rollers 🙂
They have 3 kind of awd on the 2019 Toyota rav4 , you should try the hybrid version with the électric awd and the Trail edition with the dynamic torc vectoring system 😉
Rav4 with Dynamic Torque All Wheel Drive is not available in my country. Just like Outlander with S-AWC. Hybrid Rav4 is here: ruclips.net/video/cJeFOLc_0Sw/видео.html
electric isn't very good with rear roller because electric just shoots torque unrelated to front wheel diff. and spins away uselessly while front has underpowered light gasoline engine technically 2wd open diff
it's great for road and city uses but real offroad forget electric
plus Dynamic torque is just pre-setup AWD behavior rather than, on the fly computer directed
Outlander 🥇
Disagree. They're both 6/10 AWD systems. Both more then enough on road/winter and good for light/moderate offroading. Outlander def better AWD then 2019 Rav4 hybrid but inferior to 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
+
jose luis Yañez Ferrada - Both fail.
New mazda cx5?
Coming in July :)
Very interested to see how CX5 will do. My guess is so so.
@@James-rd9mo guess is great
同じローラー（？）を使ってないと公平な比較とは言い難いと思う。
These are the same, repainted.
The outlander look like it was struggling.
except it completed one more test than the rav
@@LocoMe4u It didn't. Both failed the last one.
No i powiedz czemu nie ma jeszcze hyundai tucsona prosilem cie juz 3 razy ale huj tam😂
Nie jest tak łatwo dostępny, jak myślałem. Jeśli masz swojego, to zapraszam na test.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers ok mam jestem chetny
@@jacekplacek9776 A skąd jesteś?
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Piotrkow Trybunalski
@@jacekplacek9776 W Piotrkowie dwa samochody czekają już na test, więc wkrótce postaramy się przyjechać. Podeślij jakieś namiary na siebie przez nasz profil na FB.
Słabo ostatnia kombinacja. Jak mnie pamięć nie myli to osobowe z 4x4 zjeżdżały....
Zdarzało się, ale to nie reguła.
Outlander do the Best 😎😎😎
Mitsubishi is the king of off road .. the history prove that.
Yes much better then a Toyota 4Runner or Jeep 😂 This outlander is an average AWD system. Much better systems out there, including 2019 Rav4 Trail/Adventure.
+abuomar abuomar - Are you sure?
ruclips.net/video/O1tPIOeVvVU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/O48gTNBpXak/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/SCbraJIvtGg/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/tKu2NAIOe3M/видео.html
Mizu SuppeR
Spróbuj jakąś przeprawowkę :)
Jaką? :)
Outlander should be copmared with toyota prado
OUTLANDER PHEV 2019🙏
We didn't test 2019 PHEV, we tested 2014 and 2015.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers thanks. I watched that video. I think this is very nice test.
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟👍🇺🇦
Шо то говно шо то, Suzuki vitara nice!!!