Which is the best CS:GO resolution?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 авг 2024
- 🧽 Play on ECL - It's a FREE week for Division 3 (FACEIT lvl 1-4)!
ecl.gg/
Got the Navi resolutions from prosettings.net
To get a stretched resolution you can go through your GPU control panel, then look for desktop size and position where you can choose scaling mode "full-screen".
🔔 Subscribe for new videos weekly: / @mrmaxim
🧽 = Sponsor 
Игры
![J.P., NLE Choppa - Bad Bitty (Remix) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rBDa6BCvw10/mqdefault.jpg)
Just to put another option out there: You could take an ultrawide monitor (21:9 or 32:9) and stretch a normal 16:9 resolution to it. So you don't lose any information on the sides compared to 4:3 and you still have the effect that everything is bigger. :)
Yes this is a really neat solution. RUclips quality stays good and it's still the stretched feeling mode.
Only problem is 💸
It you play in 16:9 on a 21:9 monitor, you do lose information on the sides.
CSGO supports ultra-widescreen.
maybe im too poor to understand it :
Worse 1% and 0.1% lows. 1280x960 is all you need. Less distracting as long as its a custom res display scaled, not 1080p upscaled by windows and blurry
CSGO P2W confirmed
I've been playing CS:GO at 1920x1080 for 7 years now, tried 4:3 resolutions once in a while and I've only felt disadvantages. At the end it comes down to personal preferences.
yup
I'm playing native too
native gang rise up
Reinstalling the game will help you to play in 4:3😅
I used to play in 4:3, but now I'm playing in 16:9 like months
without having watched the video:
let me guess - it's personal preference
16:9 is me before the pandemic
4:3 stretched is me after the pandemic
I've been playing CS for over 17 years, 4:3 native back in CSS then switched to 16:9 native for csgo, but I never tried stretched. I decided to try it for past few months and my aim improved considerably, but my spray control suffered and movement felt too fast so I switched back to 16:9 native recently. Still can't decide which is better.
been playing 16:9 the whole time, i have switched to 4:3 in the past but awping and aiming moving opponents got way harder, thus i went back to 16:9. plus, bhopping is way nicer w a higher fov, to each their own ig
My personal take is that 4:3 stretched 1. makes it easier to see models and 2. allows you to focus on the center of your screen. Seeing models is important because being able to quickly identify and see models is an important aspect of aim. Allowing you to focus on the center of your screen will definitely help aim, such as with awping. You can quick scope a lot easier when your resolution is closer to a square
I'm also a firm believer in the THICC models. I think they help me hit targets better especially being 30+ years old. I also use a relatively big crosshair with a full outline so I don't ever lose vision of it in fast flicks and hectic gunfights. I can never really hit shots with the tiny barely visible crosshairs I see many people using, especially the younger players.
I've tried every resolution you can think of and tried them fairly. Through my search I have realized that At the end of the day whichever resolution you are comfortable on is for you. The only possible upside to lower res is fps. What you deem as more helpful and helps you focus on the center of your screen may be completely different for others who get there best out of higher resolution eg. Ropz. But it's nice to see everyone's input on the subject so just know that I'm just stating that all resolutions are good and there isn't simply an alpha resolution that will make everyone better.
As you said it's a personal take so I'm not gonna debate you xD however I wanted to say I started playing cs in April 2020 came from ow I'm pretty young so that works
I was good in ow and now I'm playing awp I have about 1.2k hours and pretty low time to dmg around the 300 to 400 ms Mark
I play default rez so I just want to say that it doesn't make it a lot easier to recognize an enemie anecdotal evidence= me
and you can miss a lot easier because everything seems to move faster xD
Do you want better aim and crosshair placement? Watch my last video and tell me if it helped
I used to play 4:3 stretched when I was MG2. Now I play 16:9, deranked to silver 3.
I tried this out for a few hours, and from what I can tell, it's mostly down to preference. If you have any gaming GPU released in the past 5 years, you can run CS:GO at 2560x1080 at anywhere from 70 to 300 FPS on highest settings. Performance isn't really an issue. Another reason people like to play at a narrower aspect ratio is because it improves their aim when stretched, however this is entirely subjective and is down to personal preference. It does help with visibility, but CS:GO is already designed to make players easy to spot, and a good eye will be able to do just fine on native resolution.
I play best at 21:9 (my monitor's native ratio), where the game does not have a stretched appearance. Other players like playing 4:3 stretched up to 16:9. Your aim on the horizontal axis will feel different depending on how stretched the image is because your crosshair on-screen is moving more in the real world, even though your aim is technically the same regardless of resolution. This was what killed stretched resolutions for me, it's something you have to be used to, and I did not like it personally. The only thing I liked about it was that the wider viewmodels were nicer to look at. However, I did try it in a _different_ game (Unreal Tournament 4) and it actually improved my aim significantly there. Previously, I was playing UT4 with black bars on the sides at a resolution of 1920x1080, the reason being that UT4 uses horizontal FOV instead of Vertical FOV like what CS:GO uses, so wider displays have smaller FOV. When switching to 16:9 stretched, the fatter targets allowed my eyes to lock on quicker and gave me better flick shot accuracy.
In conclusion, whether or not your gameplay improves at a stretched aspect ratio really depends on a case-by-case basis.
I think people focus to much on there settings, and try change them after a bad game. I have done this myself and after testing on native, 4:3 bb and 4:3 str. I can’t say that I play better or worse on either of them. I don’t really think the Navi players settings are the deciding factor on why they’re so good right now either ;-)
Watching s1mple try 1920x1080 in FPL for a week was hilarious tho. Dude still fragged ok but he was missing all kinds of easy shots that he would always hit.
@@Diavolo222 yea cause he isnt used to it
Really comes down to preference. s1mple, as most other pros, are simply used to 4:3 from the early 1.6 times when all monitors had that aspect ration. Never change a running system
Im here because I have constant 130fps on a 75hz monitor but the game looks worse than 60fps
@@Diavolo222 yeah, because he used 4:3 stretched for such a long time. Native is better and easier to aim with, although the advantage is minimal in games with as little vertical movement/tracking as CS.
I cant tell how happy I am! You solved my problem with screen turning black whenever I go near smokes! And it made my game look better! SO much love for you! you are the best!!!
No clue what I did but thanks!
@@MrMaxim 8xMSAA probably.
@@dav1d_csgo nope, its the custom resolution. Somehow it fixed the balck screen problem. Some people have issues with that and have no clue how to fix it!
I stumbled on 1280x960 by chance and it felt just right in all ways. So easy to get comfortable i instantly got used to it. Like it felt objectively better.
Another stretched disadvantage is that diagonal flicks will be harder, less natural.. Since the angle you flick the mouse will not be the same as what you see ingame.
However it gives you more control on that flat left-right movement. So it's down to preference. I would really like to see a FOV slider in csgo. Native res with lower fov could be the best of both worlds.
You can adjust your horizontal sensitivity to compensate for that weirdness though
It will take more mouse mouvement for you to do a 360 but at least horizontal and vertical mouse movements will feel consistent
m_yaw
don't forget that at 4:3 the players will move faster and that s a disadvantage and you can try chronometer for that
Use what ever res you want, im used to seeing the game in stretched res so it dosent matter. Just keep up the good content
I play stretched and I can tell you one reason not mentioned in this video: any openings, i.e. doors and such seem wider, meaning fighting in tight angles is alot easier and making small adjustments inside said opening is also easier.
Also the speed difference takes like maybe a day to get used to.
> making slight adjustments inside said opening is also easier
This is actually false, because your apparent sensitivity in the x-direction (the distance any reference point on the map seems to move when you move your mouse left to right a given amount) also increases. It does not actually provide any aiming advantage.
The advantage it does provide is visibility (or rather, zoom), since, by lowering your field of view, enemies appear larger. The same thing can be done by using a larger monitor or sitting closer to it, without the FOV or sensitivity inconsistency disadvantages.
However, the FOV on native 16:9 is not that high anyways, and going lower gives you a slight visibility disadvantage (for things that do not fit into your FOV).
2:30 It's more of GPU dependant. Back when I was playing with integrated Intel HD Graphics, 800x600 got me 2.5x more fps than 1920x1080. The worse your GPU, the better your performance from lowering your resolution.
Yup, going up in resolution = more strain in the GPU. As you go lower, the strain is put on the CPU.
If the GPU is strong enough, the game will just have very little differences across all resolutions like in this example, since now the limiting factor is the processor. And Counter Strike games have always been more CPU dependent.
4:3 stretched with 1280*960 is for me , gives more fps , player models are thicc and also flicks feel insanely fast.
All are placebo effect (except the fps boost)
Maximou, can you do a video about whats the more "balanced" settings options? or what options affects more the FPS?
I was a die hard 16:9 ropz believer, tried 16:10 for a week, and now 4:3 and can't go back to 16:9 ever again. And the extra 100fps also helps a lot
100 extra fps?
if he have low gpu yeah 100 fps seems fine
if you play on a laptop you'll notice it
@@MV-wb2cz yes I'm on a laptop with a 3060 5800h and an external monitor. Going from 1920x1080 -> 1280x960 made a huge difference in fps
@@keepthingscool1 I feel you, same!
in a game where people hold corners I see wider models far more important than harder to hit moving targets.
Side note: one res I've enjoyed is downscaled 4:3 stretched (similar to what you said at the end but if it were 1080p my res would be 1920:1440 so that there are more than enough pixels/inch to match the monitors native res.)
i would enjoy your videos even more on 4:3 because that gives me old school vibes :)
I've tried all and always switched back to native. But now I'm playing 16:10 1728x1080 stretched, i feel like it's the best of both worlds. The game has good quality res, it makes it just a little wider but you don't lose much fov compared to 4:3, and also doesn't feel too fast left-right like 4:3 does.
I'm actually using the same right now!
Me too
16:10 elite. I Play it at 1440p and it looks close to 16:9 (quality wise). I think even the older major stream were 16:10.
1680x1050 is the god 16:10 res
Switched to 4:3 stretched from 16:10 a few days back... started getting 100+ fps. Used to play on 60 fps earlier
Big win for my notebook😛
laptop gaming lets goooo
there is no 16:10 video end at 6:27, stop posting stuff lke this
@@raceallen1569 really hope this is a joke
@@raceallen1569 he means 16:10 aspect ratio. YT just auto timestamp linked it
your notebook probably only has a 60hz monitor (considering the performance you are getting) so there isnt much point in that extra fps
I used to play on 16:9 and my eyes were hard to focus on target, after a year i changed to 4:3 and now im stuck with it.
I don't really mind seeing in 4:3, in fact I prefer it. I got used to 4:3 so much that watching 16:9 feels abit weird for me.
Plus most pros are already streaming in 4:3 anyway so it's not that weird for a 4:3 footage to be on RUclips
agree 100%
16:9 weird? Which planet are you from? it's the resolution of 90% of the entire internet. Maybe see a doctor for ur eyes budd
@@soulsand6447 I mean on "pro streams", tell me how many CSGO pro streamers u know that stream in 16:9
@@BMHeades I don't care but since it's for csgo only then screw it other games are unplayable on that ratio
@@soulsand6447 lol, u r weird coming into a csgo comment session and saying 16:9 aint weird. LEL
I use 1920x1080 stretched on a 3440x1440 34 inch ultrawide.
Thanks for the tip about the black bars. I will try it out as looking at the radar and back to the center of the screen is really a lot of eye movement.
Did anyone tried 4:3 stretched on ultrawide?
i might try 4:3 with black bars because I don't like stretched and want some extra fps
I've used 1440x1080 stretched ever since I bought my PC three-ish years ago and I really like using it. I do have mates who use native res, but the ones that are actually good at CS tend to play stretched.
If they were good they wouldn't need to run a lower rez stretched. They NEED the bigger models because they suck!
@@twiztidsidfreak13 that's a joke right?
@@signeCS nope
@@signeCS If they are only "good" running 4:6 then they aren't good.
Same with using a thermal scope in CoD, it's a crutch for people who can't see and can't aim and have no game sense.
The ONLY reason people run low res is for the FOV change. They need the models to be bigger.
It's like running a 60FOV in Siege or CoD, you see less but what you see is bigger.
I run a 75-80 fov in most games
It's no different than playing with your keyboard sideways, it is not proven to help but some dudes think it makes them look cool. You took like a tool, turn your keyboard the right way, run the game at full res and GET GOOD SCRUB!
@@twiztidsidfreak13 you're clearly a troll
I try every type of resolution, in many fps games, from battlefield, to COD to csgo etc, and to be honest, i think starting a game when you are new is better with 16:9, because you have a better FOV, meaning you can see more and by that your learning curve is more quicker.
But when you play a certain amount of time, and when you get used to the game mechanics and and that you start having a good knowledge , lowering and stretch your resolution for the focus is not bad at all.
Just something you don't cover in your video is the impact on the vertical sensitivity of going from a stretch resolution to a "normal" and vice versa.
If the distance is the same, our brain loves to "confirm" what it sees, and without an aim with solid foundations, for young players, it can lead to a great disaster ^^.
See ya, and great vid :)
Yes. In team fortress 2, I've already know most of what I need to know in the game. But when I picked sniper, I could barely hit shots until switching to 4:3 with black bars. It reallly just does feel better to me.
@@user-bm3yv1pe1j
Yup, but with some practice ( around 2 week ) you can adapt yourself to everything, it's all in the head xD
After all, we all pick what feel good for us :)
Yeah, spray control is much easier in 16:9 than 4:3. I started csgo with 4:3 res cuz pcs in internet cafe wasnt giving constant 60fps with 16:9. I have been playing csgo for 5 years and I can say that whenever I change my res to 16:9 again I feel more comfortable while spraying. But it has other minuses compared to 4:3 as well.
So its just a personal preference.
I was just looking at the video you made on 27 Jun 2017 about resolutions.
Love seeing ECL being promoted, (Jeff must be happy... if i got that right).
4:3 this is a fasinating overview, thank you Maxim
I’ve tried literally all the resolutions and 16:9 is just the cleanest to me. 4:3 is just too fast side to side and feels awkward man. 16:10 is good but I noticed I would over flick too often.
Played 800x600 Black Bars back in 1.6, when CSGO came out in 2012 I stayed on black bars but changed to 1024x768 and then maybe 2014/15 I switched to 4:3 1024x768 Stretched and been playing on that since.
The Navi players are predominantly long time players and I assume most have used 4:3 for most of their pro career due to performance reasons and peer pressure. It’s really just down to what ur used to
it's funny that i actually found out just now that i was playing with the same settings as NAVI is. LOL
Me too lol
Maybe they copied your settings 🤷♂️😄
I began on 1080p for a while. I felt it was great for stationary shot (like defensive a site). I tried 4:3 stretched and I felt better on strafing, flicking, running, etc.
I don't know man. Just use what feels better for you
I've played since I made the transition from 1.6
I recently tried 16:9 for a few days but it was too difficult, I tried 16:10 and it seems like the perfect middle ground.
The only reason I stopped using 4:3 is the fast left and right movement, I'm starting to struggle with the ferrari peeks
then lower sens by 0.05 and see what it does?
dont forget about the possible additional input lag if you set up any non-native resolution for your display...
Tha black bars are like restricting the sight of horses in a horse run, so they can focus more at the goal.
Hey maximo! it doesn't matter what res you record your videos in, we'll love it eitherways!❤️❤️
I noticed your fps is capped to 240, I'm guessing you are using GSync. If that is the case, can you make a video on it and how affects CSGO gameplay?
I believe that the resolution should only matter to viewers if its a tutorial video. For example: NadeKing uses 1920x1080 in all of his videos. The quality is better, it's easier to understand some of the lineups for example.
I find watching someone play cs on 4:3 stretched way more enjoyable. The games just looks/feels smoother. I personally also play stretched because of this reason
What to do when my Nvidia control panel wont to work bcs when i start this just Show me a control panel screen and just crash
I want to change to 4:3 cause it feels better aiming, might be for the slight fps boost or something outside-ish. But my problem is, being playing with 16:9 for 3+ years it feels like im playing with 30 FOV and it hurts my brain
If you prefer wider models but hate how pixelated the game looks, i suggest trying a resolution that is 4:3 but with your width at max. Normally people suggest 1440x1080 but this limits by height. Playing 1920x1440 gives you a 4:3 that is crystal clear with performance as the only drawback if you dont have a great pc. Been playing 1920x1440 for a while now and holy mo its clean
I eont have 1440p monitor
@@BokiRS you can enable it with nvidia even if you dont have a 1440p monitor. My monitor is 1080p but i play 1920x1440
@@sodk5015 it doesnt make a difference. Your monitor cant display something that isnt there
@@BokiRS it squeezes the res down to fit ur monitor. The 1920 horizontal actually fits so no issue there, but then it squeezes the 1440 into 1080p. U cant say it doesnt work when i literally always use it.
@@sodk5015 if your monitor got 1080 pixels in y axis you cant display 1440 pixels there
Cool timing !
I just shifted to 4:3 to 16:10 LCD
Was thinking of res thanks
Thanks for the shoutout MrMaxim 😊😊😊😊😊😊
4:14
So, ok let me try to explain that one, the res works in the way that if you devide X:Y and the result get a proximity to 1, more streched the Character and less side vision you gonna have, let's get 6 examples, 16:9, 16:10, 3:2, 4:3, 5:4 and 1:1, if you get the X and divide by Y, more close to 1 the result is, more streched and less field of vision you have, 2 examples, 16/9=1.78, 4/3=1.34, did you what i mean?
I tried 4:3 stretched, but whenever I change the res in-game it also changes for my whole monitor setup. Meaning: I use 2 monitors and the res of second monitor (maybe if yt is open) changes, so it doesn't fit anymore. Anyone knows if this is fixable?
dont a lot of pros use 4:3 because they come from 1.6 and source so they are used to 4:3 resolutions cuz that was standard at the time
i don't notice nor mind different resolutions too much when watching videos. playing, however, i definitely notice and personally don't like 4:3. i'm used to flicking at targets in my peripherals, so stretching the game makes me constantly overshoot, thinking i need to move my mouse further than i really need to. i could see how black bars could help people focus, but for me i feel claustrophobic and like i can't see anything
It's kinda crazy how 4:3 BB feels claustrophobic but stretched doesn't. I personally play 4:3 stretched and I just can't ever agree that 4:3BB has any advantage over 16:9. The "you can focus on the center of your screen better" argument sounds kinda bs for me. Cropping your screen for no real reason just seems stupid. Rather move your HUD closer to the center if you like the 4:3 feel and still have the advantage of spotting enemies in your peripheral vision.
@@Remu- that too, my safezonex is .75 so i reek the same benefit of bb of not having to move my eyes as far
in 4:3 starched, does it change the horizontal vs vertical sensitivity?
since the horizontal sensitivity movement will be faster.
as someone who plays 5:4 stretch, it really doesn't matter what your res is, i recently switch to 16:9 cause its easier to create content with, csgo is a buggy game so sometimes 4:3 5:4 16:10 can mess with the display capture.
This could be useful to people who are just worse at spotting stuff. Most people should be fine with a 16:9 and will have no actual benefit from a 4:3 stretched. At best it will be a placebo, but when you actually try to test if you spot models more easily you quickly realize that there is no difference at all. The only universal benefit is going to be performance. The other important thing is the black bars. As you said, it helps you focus. This would be helpful for people that have simply developed poorly, which is more common in more recent generations. If you typically find it hard to focus on anything and your eyes wander to anything (lack of peripheral vision use) then 4:3 black bars should actually be a great help.
wider models = easier to spot when enemy swings out
Good video. I'm using 1280x1024 stretched 4:3 and is definitive my best setting for vision good contrast enemy model and crosshair on every distance without bad look of piksels on long distance. I'm using full HD monitor.
I have been playing 4:3 res and it's really helpful
Been doing this since 1.6 but can't find it in CS:GO
Just preferences … I feel like for most players 4:3 makes the game smoother. Also u forgot that not all of NaVi are using 1280x960. The headshot machine b1t uses 1440x1080 :)
Hey man, how to change the map logo? Let me know :)
Hello @BananaGaming ! I have an error witch i can`t fix ... can you help me please ? Wen i open my game ... and open the console i see this ,, DispatchAsyncEvent backlog, failed to dispatch all this frame. 240 of 272 remaining `` And i try to search the fix ... for this error ... but i can`t fix it ... :(
how can i make my game stretched, I put on 4:3 but it doesnt feel stretched
Feels like this video ended too early and suddenly.
i actually tried 1440x1080 and love it, i get the exact "feeling" as when i'm using 1280x960 but with a far better image quality !! i never tried it until i found this video so thanks brother
I’ve been using 1280x960 for so long it seems like it’s one of the most popular resolutions and for good reason
You didnt mention that you need a specific amount of faceit games to be played for the ecl, atleast thats how it was about a month ago
As a support player / lurker for my teammates, I use 16:9 for the extra FOV. It also doesn't really affect my FPS. I mean I can't really see the difference between 300 FPS and 400 FPS. And maybe that's because I'm just a noob right
There is no roles in MM
Why can't one play roles in MM? U can play a 5 stack and all have roles. U don't need to play esea or faceit to use roles buddy.
I personally use a 16:10 aspect ratio for competitive shooters at a custom res of 1152x720. It combines a good FOV, good graphics/clarity, and some stretching to make for a good experience.
It streches the game very minimally
1152×720 is not a good quality
There is no problem with showing a lower resolution, its more about consistency
Love watching and playing 4:3,viewmodels look much better on 4:3
I think 4:3 on native vertical of your monitor is the best 1440 x 1080p streched or black bars whatever you prefer and use MSAA x8 to the sharpest lock
Hi Mrmaxim, I just realized when using 4:3 1280x960 I'm using a 4k monitor, when most pro players are using a 1080 monitor, so i was wondering does it matter what native resolution your monitor runs or no?
I used 4:3 for years but decided to try 16:9 and my game improved immediately and a lot. I've been using it for 1 year and a half and I've never played it so well. It's personal preference, some people will prefer it too. There is no better res
same i also feel better and sharper with 16 9
i would love to play with higher clarity but is i enable even 2xMSAA my screen jitters a lot
How about antisotropic filtering? Do they use that or leave it off
Can i play 2560x1440 on 4:3 stretched ??
Or should i change to 1920x1080
I would like to see someone using 21:9 streched on 32:9 monitor. I think it would the best combo.
i switch between stretched and native resolutions depending on the map, usually stretched res at wingman maps and native on bigger maps
that's insane
Thanks for sharing your creativity with us 👍👀🙆
Is there an ECL equivalent for US?
msaa x8 tanks performance. The thing is that cs go is mostly cpu bound and its harder to max out GPU on low setting and with low res. My fps doesn't change with msaa x8 but my gpu usage is higher and my gpu draws more wats and there is more heat coming out of my pc.
when i had a bad pc i had to use 4:3 then when i got a better one i tried 16:9 for a month and ended up going back to 4:3 because it feels like movement is easier when it isnt
I was stuck at gn 4 and started to play 4:3 stretched and got to mg 2 super fast becuse it was more easy to hit heads
Ive been playing CS since 2000. One and the most important reason why i choose 1280x960 is old habits...
Since start I played 4:3 800x600 or 1024 res but that was cuz I had bad PC. When I got new PC I tried 1920x1080, but I didnt feel like it was best so I came back to 4:3 black bars just feels better.
i tried changing to 4:3 stretched 1440x1080 in csgo but it turned black screen for me :(
I do play 4:3 in 1280x1024 should i change it to 960
So they are all playing black bar? Or is there a way go get 1280x960 stretched like 1400x1080
Hey, in case you read this, on the website for the minimum FACEIT games for ECL it says:
LEGENDS: 700 games
Division 1: 400 games
Division 2: 250 games
Division 3: 100 games
does that mean Division 3 is the lowest and I will need 100 games to join? Because I played Valve matchmaking, and only 31 Matches (my friend 22) on FACEIT so far. I have troubles with FACEIT removing my subscription and without FACEIT premium I often got a toxic teammate, so in order to join ECL with my friend I have to play 69 (nice) more FACEIT games?
i heard some people said "streched resulations makes your GPU damaged" is it true ?
I play since 1.6 on 800x600 black bars .. now with 4xMSAA ,but didnt try 8XMSAA and it doesnt looks that different
What is the most suitable 4:3 for 27 inch?
I absolutely hate when I watch someone clutch and enemy peeks on the side, but my teammate can't see him.
Is that because they use stretched res
@@rezsogaming7224 yes, you have much smaller fov
the sens feel so much better when you use 4.3 i have tried 16.9 but i hadd to change sens cuz its was so diffrent feeld soo slow
How to stretch view on 4:3 ? in windows or cs lobby?
Fnatic (the dominant one in 2015) were all on 1024x768 blackbars, except flusha stretching the same res.
Resolution doesn't matter, its all preferance.
Should you play gpu or display render scaling for black bars?
as people know 4:3 you lose fov for the stretched effect but an alternative ive found and used to get somewhat of a stretched effect is using 16:10 (not 16:9)
(example is) when i play regular maps ill use 4:3 (Dust 2, mirage, inferno, nuke). but on big maps (insurgency, insurgency 2, all battle royale maps*) i use 16:10 for a bit more fov.
I do not usually play Native 1080p as for a long time ive had a pc that couldn't play at 1080p 100+FPS, now when i do try to play a 1080p i feel crosseyed.
Recommended resolutions to try Other than (4:3) 1280x960. (SOME OF THESE RESOLUTIONS YOU CAN GET REALLY GOOD IN GAME FPS)
(4:3)
600X800
1024x768
12801024
1440x1050
1440x1080
and higher if you have a higher monitor resolution.
(16:10)
1440x900
1080x1080 SUPER STRETCHED BOIIII*
1660x1050
1660x1080
and higher if you have a higher monitor resolution.
(16:9)
1600X900
1920X1080 NATIVE*
and higher if you have a higher monitor resolution.
for 16:10 you can also use 1728x1080 its rlly good bananagaming uses it too
Please make video about how to reduce sv var and choke in CSGO
Me and my friends are encountering it . And there is no good tutorial in youtube to fix it. Please make a video about how to reduce sv
For me it’s 16:9 if you have good skins and if not then 5:4 since it’s the most stretched that still lets you see