The Strongest Country of every century (1st - 21st) Explained In 18 Minutes
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 май 2024
- 00:00 1st-5th
01:24 6th
02:07 7th
02:44 8th-9th
03:21 10th
04:39 11st
05:51 12nd-13rd
06:28 14th
07:52 15th
09:38 16th
10:45 17th
11:21 18th
12:23 19th
14:24 20th
17:35 21st 
Игры
Watch the full Adventure Time story (made by my friends) ruclips.net/video/PEpwTl8I3kk/видео.htmlsi=eZITcynnGut5cyqL
1:36 byzantium wasnt established by Constantine it was an ancient thracian settlement
The map in 1:46 is a fake , because explain how America appears on it if it had not been discovered yet.
Islam>
12th century: nothing changed
13th century: everything changed💀
yep, Genghis Khan
Tbh Eastern Rome during the 12th century deserves credit, the Komnenians are chads
🗿🇬🇷Byzantine Empire🤝🗿🇮🇷Sasanian Empire
Rashidun caliphate jumpscare
@@jaywee6430Umayyad caliphate jumpscare
Timurids, Ottoman, Golden horde: Traitor 😡
Sasanian Empire: 😒
It's always the external issues 💀
+ Internal
But indeed, internal issue was a huge problem for every empires back than
Britain was absolutely the strongest country of the 19th century and not France
To be honest while Britain was very rich it never had quite the same military might or cultural influence even at it's peak, in fact it is already very generous to give it the spot of "strongest" just for it's economic prowess. The most questionnable place would be the Russians, as they surely never reached the top in any significant indicator albeit perhaps population.
Awesome memes subbed
Cool video man. I like your content a lot
Cool profile pic
@@nibiru27 You must love Big Brother. It is not enough to obey him: you must love him.
@@user-os2yp6ph2z literally 1984
Hidden gem of a channel!
12:51 "belgium" *circles netherlands* "netherlands" *points to north germany*
LOL
u got a good eye ngl
Thank you for informations
Thank you!
Great video thank you
Cool vid. There are some mistakes, but overall its great for beginners
Wish you add the military budget for the US but great video!
Thats so nice towatch thanks body!
napoleonic Empire
*insert royalist here*
Colonial Empire
*insert napoleon here*
wtf
Poland overslept again
10:44 Qing Dynasty ruled by the Manchurian not The Han. The Yuan Dynasty was ruled by the Mongolian
what bugged me is tye complete neglect of the dutch empire wich was incredibly powerfull during the 1600s they had almsot the entire spice trade, had a HUGE naval fleet (bigger then spain france and england's fleet combined) and ruled various colonies,
"Byzantine" empire doesn't exist. It was not any continuation of the eastern roman empire. It WAS the eastern roman empire up until 476. After that it was THE Roman Empire.
4:00 the earliest threat fun fact were the hungarians causing raids as west of italy 😮
Weird that you brought up decolonisation and the downfall of the British Empire in the 18th century, even though that didnt happen until the mid 20th century. Britain's strength and dominance only increased during the 19th century after defeating Napoleon and establishing itself as THE colonial empire in the world. Reaching it's territorial height of around 1/4 of the world's landmass in 1920.
i think he just brings up every countries downfall and here he didn't mean that the British empire fell in the 18th century but rather that at one point it did fall
By 1920 it had already been weakened and increasingly displaced by other countries such as the USA. WW2 ended with the British
The British were without a doubt the most powerful country in the 19th Century and that never got mentioned
Iran was one of the most powerful countries in the world during the Safavid period
Bro learn and research more history on the balkan peninsula before you start blasting bullshit
The china and India we're so underrated, no cap
8:03 and yet Still they paid abusive taxes to their Northern Neighbor the Aztec Empire
Very good speech
how am i supposed to explain my source to my history teacher
1:46 maps in that time were way more advanced than that, it's just a religious representation.
0:12 0:13 added to my sabaton random images playlist
LOL😭
The flag of the Confederation of the Rhine had a flag similar to Sierra Leone but with a darker shading
“I have ten million power in rise of kingdoms.”
Fun fact: the Spanish Empire and the Portuguese Empire once combinated by a few years, making it the biggest empire ever existed
Anyone else notice there’s like 4 channels exactly like this that literally make the exact same videos
Yes
Parthian and Sassanian are the both Persian with Persian culture
13:33 Spain, dude,Spain ,☝🏼
I think he did a good job explaining the US
The fact pre-columbian civilizations fell was because the same pre-columbians who attacked the mayor civilizations, and 300 horses
Fake
@@Galletas-my3sv fake is your father figure
@@crushingwasledghammer66 Boy, besides, they weren't civilizations, they were states.
9:45 🇪🇦 9:50
The only thing that bugged me was that you didn't talk about the US territorys who aren't "states", but are also part of the united states.
Why do you explain some parts slowly?
5th century is definitely the huns and 9th would either be the abbasids or the carolangian empire their alliance could’ve easily collapsed Byzantium I don’t think it’s even close
Guptas defeated both Huns and Sassanins
@@parthb.714 they were not much contribution from guptas to defeat huns, there were other small indian kingdoms who expelled hunns from india
The Byzantine Empire was my favorite… but I didn’t know that they believed that this what the world was like 💀☠️: 1:45
I don’t think that’s a Byzantine map and fairly legible early modern German is on it so it’s probably from like the 1500s or something
First and Second Bulgarian Empires left the chat
@Atakan-ln2xv your not important to society 😑
@Atakan-ln2xv your mom doesn't love you, your dad left you, your grandma doesn't love you and you'll grow up to be Adam Sandler
Where is the VOC??
Here comes the people who glazes on middle eastern empires
First Bulgarian Empire left the chat.
The Empire of Japan wasn't even close to being the strongest in that century, all they did was fighting poor and underveloped China, they had some initial success but were getting pushed back when the Chinese managed to actually give their troops decent equipment.
6:45
Truely the Swelly Orange the Magnificent
Intresting how the Ottomans stayed at the top for a long period of time
De verdad piensas que el imperio otomano fue más importante que el imperio español 😂
Персы одни из самых недооценненных народов ,они сейчас в сложном положении ,но они сного заявят о себе 🇹🇯🇮🇷🇦🇫❤️🔥
Cant tell if this channel is one of those ai content farms or not
The voice seems kinda fake, and there were definitely some AI images in there
it definitely is
You forgot about Macedonian empire 😡
I have put the countries AD only😭😭
That was in B.C.
Can you read and hear
@@drexplained0 What about Gupta Empire?
Lol almost f by some locals of brahmin city near multan
Missed the Gupta empire beat the Persians and pushed back the Huns after initial loss
WHERE MY BOY BULGARIAN EMPIRE EVEN YOU FORGOTTEN ABOUT ITT 😭😭😭😭
Out of the entire century, they were definitely not the strongest
Perhaps he is a Byzaboo who is still salty for what the Bulgarians had done in 811 and then the early 900s!
3:30 Thats me!
Very good video but I think you can also could mention about Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth if only because in XVII century Commonwealth have terriory from baltic sea to black sea and have a very strong army (Winged Polish Hussars), but the video is still very good :))
Ottoman empire was stronger that's why u guys attacked us from behind
"ottoman empire was the best country in 16th century"
Meanwhile Ottomans were scared of Poles and losed war with poland
Ottomans defeated Poles many many times. What are you talking about? 16th Century Ottomans are unbeatable alone.
@@MarkhasSteelfort Are you from poland or turkey? or you are from America
@@FS22_BS I'm from Balkans. I would like to add that, Poles were surely strong, arguably the strongest Christian state at the time but considering the coalitions fought by Ottomans, I would say they are stronger as an Imperial power.
@@MarkhasSteelfort Poles saved europe from ottomans
@@FS22_BS You are aware of the fact that they Poles were part of a coalition right? Poland didn't beat Ottomans alone. It was the Holy League and they were fighting for a long time. Ottomans were already at logistical capacity, they couldn't have gone any further than Vienna. Poles did break the siege but they couldn't save themselves from the people they saved.
Bulgaria was the strongest country during the 10th century. The Byzantine empire hasn’t won a single battle during the reign of emperor Simeon the great
Hahahahaha
In what universe is Bulgaria ever the world's strongest empire.
@@Holy_VHS_Tape Diring the first half of the 10th century. Yes, it was for a short time but it’s a fact that the Byzantine empire couldn’t defeat Bulgaria even with an army two times bigger. You can watch a video about the battle of Achelous (917)
@@Holy_VHS_TapeIn this, the fact that most "history lovers" only know Bulgaria from WW1 does not mean that it is false.
Seljuks,Ottomans based. 🇹🇷
Every where I go I see you fella 😶
One more time .... seljuks are 🇮🇷🇹🇷 not only 🇹🇷
@@King.Of.Persia leader are Turks also Seljuks ancestors from🇹🇲. İran ?? İranian people just a living in the seljuks. Seljuks conquered the iran. Maybe a mixed Culture but Seljuks still🇹🇲🇹🇷🇦🇿 Turkic Empire but mixed iranian culture...
@@NationalistTurk.-nq1sb mixed and become iranian , like safavid
Sassanid honest reaction:Bruh
Iberian península its not just Spain thank you very much
All century
1st century=0ad
2nd century=100ad
3rd century=200ad
4th century=300ad
5th century=400ad
6th century=500ad
7th century=600ad
10 likes for part 2
What?
You forgot of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, in 17th century it was strongest country in the world that contained 90% of balkans, belarus, ukraine and some part of russia (including moscow 1610-1612) it had almost 1million km² and had scariest army (hussars)
After Ottomans, yes. Their only major success against Ottomans was the 2nd Siege of Vienna and the army was a coalition so it wasn't just Poles. Ottomans were facing against combined major powers of Europe while the Commonwealth had regional rivalries were fighting against Ottomans occasionally. If the same European coalition hit the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth they would be annihilated.
@@MarkhasSteelfort in general polish-lithuanian commonwealths army rank was 1 and i doubt ottomans would handle getting moscow while fighting with russia, polish-lithuanian commonwealth was also very much invaded and wont of course most wars, polish-lithuanian commonwealth solos ottomans
@Sandomer21 You have got to be kidding me. Ottoman vassal Crimean Khanate burned Moscow few times.
Also, history has shown that Ottomans fought against many coalitions and won. Their army structure is very organized and it is supported by a solid logistical system, which is legacy of Roman Imperial land system. The Commonwealth has never faced coalitions or crusades like the Ottomans did. Even with weakening Sultans, no one was able to match Ottoman power on land until 1700.
I would say that after the Ottoman army, it is either the Spanish or the Polish Commonwealth land army that is strongest.
Very good.
I have a question why is Bengal Sultanate isn't consider a superpower in 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th century when it made 12% of global gdp in 14-15th century and 15% in 17-18th century and 3rd largest population and one of the best navy but Russian empire with a population less then even main land France and also poor was a Superpower??
I don't know about the centuries, but I know they didn't exist in the later half of the 18th century
They were a great power in India not in the world. Not to offend anybody but India has been a pretty backward country through its entire existence. The Mughals were a great power because it was by far the most populated country since China descided to collapse again. And the Timurids (partly India) were great because "Tamerlane" was a great military leader like Napoleon or Ghensis Khan.
bengal sulthanate was a part of delhi sulthanate and mughal for a long time , in 1720s i think it got independence from mughal s but soon in 1757 bengal was annexed by british
@@jemoedermeteensnor88 sounds like a typical westerner comment on south asia.
@@kumaraanu it was independent from mid1300s-late1500s and from early 1700s to mid 1700s and it was a vassal state semi independent under them
2:53 thats the flag of Penghu county of Taiwan lmao
This is realistic but the Bulgarian empire in the 9th century defeated the Byzantine so i guess bulgaria should be it.
I like The Roman History 🇮🇹
Can't wait to see some kazaks trying to claim golden horde because they was majority of population
Proud to see the Mughal Empire in the list ❤❤❤
Máozédōng wànsuì. Zhōnghuá rénmín gònghéguó guāngróng lǐngxiù wànsuì! Zìyóu cànlàn de yángguāng yīn nǐ ér cànlàn. Láiyīn héhé shǐdálín. Shàngdì bǎoyòu gònghéguó
Can you do the same for the bc period? Dehli sultnate replled the mongols and you forgot the Gupta empire who eventually beat back the Huns and was replaced by the rajput kingdoms who stopped both Arabs and Huns and Turks for a while
Sure the Delhi Sultanate repelled the Mongols, but it was like their first point for the standings against the Mongols 20 if you know what I’m saying
@@rkdehart7351 no they also beat the rajput warriors and other rajput kingdoms
@@rkdehart7351 they repelled mongol inversions for a good 100 years
@williamFromBirmingham every Indian empire like Gupta was richer than Europe combined and Gupta was the golden age.
@williamFromBirmingham Gupta was a superpower in the 4th & 5th centuries. They defeated the Huns in Gupta-Hunnic War. These were the same Huns who had completely destroyed the Western Roman Empire. Not only militarily but also they were by far the largest economy in the world. Chess & Zero also originated from the Gupta Empire
There is very little impartiality in this video, right? (to give some examples according to the creator as a summary).
-Spanish Empire: slaves (it was one of the powers of the time that had the least), killing natives (the vast majority died from diseases to which they were not immune or killed by other natives), stealing gold (the Spanish took much less than is thought, the Romans took more gold from Spain than Spain from Latin America), obtaining wealth (the Iberian Peninsula hardly benefited, most of what was extracted stayed in the colonies).
Conclusion: nothing good from what is implied.
-British Empire: exploration (the Spanish empire should not have had that XD), trade (the Spanish empire also traded a lot, like it opened new trade routes for all of Europe), colonies (it does not say anything bad about the treatment of the British) , a very important role in world history, shaping cultures, economies and political systems (all this is also contributed by other empires, the Spanish one too and it is not said).
Conclusion: everything is good as it is implied.
I say all this not to deny the importance of the British Empire, I am simply struck by the treatment given to some empires compared to others in a completely false way.
The spanish empire abolished native american slavery in 1512 burgos laws, That most died for other Native Americans is false (From the Spanish territories), Not counting diseases, 2 Million (lowest estimate) died as a direct cause of Spain.
Spain discovered much more than the United Kingdom, discovery of America, First circumnavigation in history, Congo River, western coast of the Americas, from Alaska to Tierras de Fuego, Chile, Amazon, Antarctica, maybe Australia, Oceania (first), Hawaii and most Pacific Islands, Philippines, China and Japan, all of Southeast Asia. India and Sri Lanka (Iberian Union), Middle East and the Persian Gulf. Most of the current territory of the USA. Caribbean, Atlantic Ocean, Pacific, (the English did not have access through Spain)
Se la ha chupado demasiado a España en el siglo XVI,cuando Portugal aun después de Elcano tenía el comercio mundial en sus manos y el Imperio Otomano se soleaba a todos en Europa solo tras el tornaviaje en 1565 y Lepanto cambian las cosas.
@@danielguerrero894 el comercio mundial estaba bastante repartido, no solo en manos de Portugal, pero bueno que veo que tus comentarios van en el sentido de negar todo lo relacionado con España.
Us military during 2nd world war where?
Temurids empire 14 century
brother, charlemagne was the the first holy roman emperor...not otto...
gupta empire (1st to 5th)
vijayanagara empire(14th-15th)
chola empire(10th-13th)
is the strongest during their era
That’s just not true lol
"Why the **** you lying, why you always lying Mnmm omg stop ***** lying!"
The Strongest In Indian subcontinent, not in the world, don't cry about that
USA:IF GOD HAD WANTED U TO LIVE HE WOULS NOT HAVE CREATED ME!!!
So you are telling me that if there were no internal and external problems , every human would be a Christian Turk nowadays.
15:00 Switzerland
The Mughal emperors were basically just timurids 😊
the ballsdex France😅
I know what BC, BCE, AD, and CE are, but what is AC?
After Christ, It's like AD
@@drexplained0 how does AC relate to AD or CE?
It's supposed to mean Ante Christum, or before Christ in Latin. It's misused in this video.
Agustus look like trump tbh
You're just hallucinating🤫
Were Polish - Lithuanian comonwealt
I think in 12th Century Cholamandalam Empire was the strongest empire. And it was declined at the end of 12th Century AD. Also, isn't Gupta Empire stronger in 3rd to 5th Century AD?
yeah bro this person is terribly underestimating india. we had the more man power and bigger economy for most of the history
@@kumaraanu Having more economy and having more money doesn't mean that we are a superpower. And I'm not blaming the creator here because he might not have knew about Cholas. Everyone can have a mistake not only him. And everytime, India doesn't have to be the strongest country.
@@kumaraanu Cholas and their descendants (Dravidians) was never connected with India. Cholas never even knew about India. They only cared about Dravida Rajya (Dravidia) and Southeast Asia. So, Cholas aren't Indian they're Dravidians.
@@kumaraanu @Dr. Explained never underestimated India in any ways. He just only made a mistake which is basically common for any RUclipsr.
Funny how Umayyads are shown as GigaChads, they were a controversial bunch.
12:34: You used the flag of the late Kingdom of France for the "French Napoleonic Empire." Also, France didn't dominate the 19th century (perhaps the beginning), but it was the British who were dominant. France really peaked during the 17th and 18th centuries. True, the first decade of the 19th century seemed dominated by France, but after Napoleon's defeat, the French made sure to respect the balance of power. By the time Napoleon III rose to power, France was still a great power but not as powerful as during the French and Napoleonic Wars for a number of reasons, notably population decline. Before the Revolution, it was the most populous and most prosperous country in Europe, but all the wars drastically impacted the population. It also didn't help that France was plagued by instability, and they were eventually outclassed by Germany.
Overall, I don't think you can reduce the history of an empire, let alone a country, to only one century.
Okay. Which country will be the next strongest in the 22nd century?
Ottoman empire
@@popbob4100 It'll be Neo Ottoman Empire which means Turkey rejects NATO membership and starts getting every land.
@@popbob4100 It'll be more like the Neo Ottoman Empire which means Turkey will reject their NATO membership and start getting back their land that was originally theirs.
🙋🏻♂️🇩🇪
@@popbob4100 Ok.
Well.....Rome was a kingdom and then a Republic for a few centuries before not only that time didn't actually fall until the fifth crusade wrecked the city causing the ottomens to conquer their last great city like thousand years after Western half of their empire fell so the Romans were damn near 2,000 years of existence but what do I know...🤷
failed to mention australia, sending a complaint to your parents.
People who don’t watch this video: they won’t learn it
i would have to disagree with you on the British Empire
id say there century was the 19th not the 18th as the Pax Britannica was 1815 to 1914
Yes, in the 18th century things were equal in Europe between the French, the British and the Spanish. From the beginning of the 19th century, Spain fell in level in terms of power compared to the other two.
@@SergioSP-kc8bd I agree id say France was a little more powerful than Britain but the seven years war was the turning point
@@gordonmcintosh8333Remember that later France became the greatest power because of Napoleon, The Spanish empire in 1780-1805 planned a Hispanic "commonwealth" and gave independence in America and adapted, Ferdinand Vll, King of Spain, was the reason that Spain definitely lost any possibility of being a counterweight to the UK.
@@Galletas-my3sv of course under Napoleon the French were the power but that for was 15 years of the 19th century the other 85 Britain was the power and while i understand Napoleon was not beat by Britain alone he did lose
@@SergioSP-kc8bd En el siglo XVIII España fue el escudero de Francia,mucho territorio pero no estaba en primera fila.
What does AC stand for? How's it different from AD (Anno Domini)?
After Christ
16 century poland?
They were good but Ottomans were in another league.
19th century was UK
3rd Century AC.