Great. Latvian sounds beautiful. Make a comparison of Vedic, Old Polish, Latvian, Avestan, Latin. I suggest making more divisions of the text in the numerals and the Lord's Prayer and arrows with links to lexical links, so that the similarities and differences are more visible. It is worth mentioning in the description that this Lord's Prayer in the image of God - the Father of Heaven, although it was created on Semitic soil, has symbolic connections with the images of the Indo-European Father of Heaven - Dyaus Pitar, Jupiter, Diovis Pater, etc., which may be related to the formation of Hebrew literature in the captivity of the Indo-European Persians in Babylon, which, by the way, has its symbolic continuation in the image of Jesus Christ being visited by the Magi (Magi is a word and function from the Persian world). The similarity and difference of words meaning heaven are also interesting. Dyaus - debesis, Divi, Slavic "dziwy", or even the word "nebesa" (as debesiis, divi) after the d-n shift, reversed like the shift in the number nine. It results from the phonetic proximity between n and d, between which there is only a change of objects closing from the mouth to the tongue and teeth. Both are articulated in front. Many believe that the Baltic languages are the most archaic, which some wrongly associate with the similarity to Vedic Sanskrit, as if it were somehow ennobling. This is a wrong assumption, because archaic in no way means a better language. The Lithuanian or Latvian language is beautiful regardless of its supposed archaicity. Archaic is also not the same as similarity to Vedic, because some languages, whether Germanic, Latin, Slavic, Celtic or any other, have certain features that are more archaic than Avesta or Vedas. The Polish forms "gwiazda" - gwiazd "gwizdać" - gwizd are different from other Slavic and have avoided palatalization, and in Sanskrit (sziszkar - whistle) or in Latvian (zvaigzne-gwiazda, svilpe - whistle ) we already have a form with palatalization (lit. "žvaigždė švilpukas"). In this respect, Czech or Polish turn out to be more archaic than Latvian or Vedic. But, for example, in the case of the word "król" or "noszenie" it is not
Vedic Sanskrit sounds much closer to other indo European languages comparing to classical Sanskrit. Which shows how indo aryan immigrants sounded. Classical Sanskrit emerged later out of vedic Sanskrit including prakrit languages which gave birth to later indo aryan languages.
Well not really; the similarity can be exaggerated by simply choosing to use more IE cognates (e.g. water as ApaH instead of Jalam). Classical Sanskrit is very, and I mean VERY IE; it just uses a broader vocabulary. Vedic Sanskrit and its later classical Sanskrit are some of the most conservative IE languages. The Indo-Aryan migrants likely hadn’t spoken Vedic Sanskrit, but an archaic ancestor, sort of a middle man between PII, Old Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit. Some linguists call it Porto-indo-Aryan. There is no indication that the Vedic language itself originated from outside of the sub-continent; instead, there’s plenty of evidence, such as retroflexion, that Vedic Sanskrit evolved in the sub-continent from its ancestor.
Vedic Sanskrit vs Proto-Dravidian next please. Want to see how the language of the nomadic Aryan invaders differed from that of the Indus Dravidian farmers? 😍
Peak Proto-Indo-European levels these two extant languages are stationed at
PIE was centum both those are satem so not really. But many archaic features nevertheless.
Great duo thanks for sharing.
I sent the malagasy Vezo dialect audio samples and images
Still waiting for answers
You haven't replied yet 😢
Wait and don't spam or he will block you
@Motogpboy-n2o ok
Suggestion: Sioux language
Great. Latvian sounds beautiful. Make a comparison of Vedic, Old Polish, Latvian, Avestan, Latin. I suggest making more divisions of the text in the numerals and the Lord's Prayer and arrows with links to lexical links, so that the similarities and differences are more visible.
It is worth mentioning in the description that this Lord's Prayer in the image of God - the Father of Heaven, although it was created on Semitic soil, has symbolic connections with the images of the Indo-European Father of Heaven - Dyaus Pitar, Jupiter, Diovis Pater, etc., which may be related to the formation of Hebrew literature in the captivity of the Indo-European Persians in Babylon, which, by the way, has its symbolic continuation in the image of Jesus Christ being visited by the Magi (Magi is a word and function from the Persian world).
The similarity and difference of words meaning heaven are also interesting. Dyaus - debesis, Divi, Slavic "dziwy", or even the word "nebesa" (as debesiis, divi) after the d-n shift, reversed like the shift in the number nine.
It results from the phonetic proximity between n and d, between which there is only a change of objects closing from the mouth to the tongue and teeth. Both are articulated in front.
Many believe that the Baltic languages are the most archaic, which some wrongly associate with the similarity to Vedic Sanskrit, as if it were somehow ennobling. This is a wrong assumption, because archaic in no way means a better language.
The Lithuanian or Latvian language is beautiful regardless of its supposed archaicity.
Archaic is also not the same as similarity to Vedic, because some languages, whether Germanic, Latin, Slavic, Celtic or any other, have certain features that are more archaic than Avesta or Vedas.
The Polish forms "gwiazda" - gwiazd "gwizdać" - gwizd are different from other Slavic and have avoided palatalization, and in Sanskrit (sziszkar - whistle) or in Latvian (zvaigzne-gwiazda, svilpe - whistle ) we already have a form with palatalization (lit. "žvaigždė
švilpukas"). In this respect, Czech or Polish turn out to be more archaic than Latvian or Vedic.
But, for example, in the case of the word "król" or "noszenie" it is not
Hey Andy, okay, I'll send you a language in a while. :)
It's basically the same language. Only words are different, the rest is absolutely the same
'It's the same language, aside from the thing that constitutes language being different'
@@EVO6- bingo bongo
"It's the same language"
'Only the words are different"
OK then.
@@valevisa8429 absolutely. It's so obvious
Jā , tas tiesa 100% .
😄😄😄
Neredzu nekādu sakarību
Varbūt ja latvietis ēstu karstu kartupeli , sanāktu līdzīgas skaņas .
😄😄😄
1:40
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 0:14
Vedic Sanskrit sounds much closer to other indo European languages comparing to classical Sanskrit. Which shows how indo aryan immigrants sounded.
Classical Sanskrit emerged later out of vedic Sanskrit including prakrit languages which gave birth to later indo aryan languages.
Well not really; the similarity can be exaggerated by simply choosing to use more IE cognates (e.g. water as ApaH instead of Jalam). Classical Sanskrit is very, and I mean VERY IE; it just uses a broader vocabulary. Vedic Sanskrit and its later classical Sanskrit are some of the most conservative IE languages.
The Indo-Aryan migrants likely hadn’t spoken Vedic Sanskrit, but an archaic ancestor, sort of a middle man between PII, Old Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit. Some linguists call it Porto-indo-Aryan. There is no indication that the Vedic language itself originated from outside of the sub-continent; instead, there’s plenty of evidence, such as retroflexion, that Vedic Sanskrit evolved in the sub-continent from its ancestor.
Classical Sanskrit has been assimilated with Dravidian i think
Amazing. please do Proto-Germanic and Proto-Indo-Iranic or Vedic Sanskrit.
Vedic Sanskrit vs Proto-Dravidian next please.
Want to see how the language of the nomadic Aryan invaders differed from that of the Indus Dravidian farmers? 😍
Can You Do Vedic Sanskrit And Estonian?
It would make no sense due to Estonian's uralic roots. These two languages originated from indo-european but Estonian didn't.
Do Turkish and Urdu
Not related
Yenisei Kyrgyz language please
Make video on similarities between sanskrit and prakrit
Would have been more interesting to compare vocab that shows the languages' similarities, not just reading out a text
First