Climate Change Makes Days Longer
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 апр 2024
- Thanks to Opera for sponsoring this video. Click here opr.as/Opera-browser-SabineHo... to upgrade your browser for FREE!
Climate change has had some pretty weird consequences - beers are tasting worse, goats are shrinking, and flights are bumpier. Another unexpected outcome is that the rotation of the earth has slowed, making days longer. How does that work? Let’s have a look.
Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s4158...
🤓 Check out my new quiz app ➜ quizwithit.com/
💌 Support me on Donatebox ➜ donorbox.org/swtg
📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ sciencewtg.substack.com/
👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ / sabine
📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ sabinehossenfelder.com/newsle...
👂 Audio only podcast ➜ open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXl...
🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜
/ @sabinehossenfelder
🖼️ On instagram ➜ / sciencewtg
#science #sciencenews #climatechange 
Наука
I live in Helsinki, which is on the 60th latitude. If I walk 2 meters to the south, my mass gets farther from Earth's axis. This causes Earth's rotation to be slower until I walk back and the original rotation is restored.
You could use this power for good, but will you?
Oh boy, have you considered going on a diet? 😊
It's okay. In Helsinki, you got all day or night to get there 😊
Please consider us when you go for your walk..
You must be from America.
As a programmer who sometimes has to deal with leap seconds, I advocate for calibrating the mass distribution and thereby the speed of rotation of the earth, so that programmers like me will no longer have to deal with leap seconds.
If the day is shorter than 86400 seconds, we shift more mass toward the equator and slow down the day. If the day is longer than 86400 seconds, we freeze more mass at the poles and speed up the day. This way, we no longer set our time according to the earth, but the earth according to our time.
I feel this is a much more pressing matter than any concerns regarding global warming and am counting on your support for a binding UN resolution.
We could build a large snowman at the poles.
I suggest Greta Thunberg and Ricarda Lang as UN executives. They will do a most excellent job. Dealing with leap seconds had never been easier.
Typical programmer, kicking the can down the road. There's only so much water to freeze or melt, after that what?
@@2ndfloorsongs After that, we can start pumping magma up to build mountains where we need extra weight, and melting crust and pumping it down into the core where we need less weight. Easy peasy. I'm a programmer too, we're experts you know.
@@nycbearff no need to pump. Magma just spurts up anyways coz of the pressure. All we have to do is make a crussy in the crust
If you need precision down to seconds, over s time span of days, you should not base your calculations on the calendar seconds.
But now I got curious about Unix time and leap seconds
Someone somewhere is writing the script for the next global disaster movie where the Earth has stopped spinning due to climate change and they need some scientists and engineers to jump-start the rotation using nuclear bombs.
I think meteorites would be more effective.
Don´t forget Bruce Willis.
the Core? the movie had been produced several years ago.
carbon dioxide never the weather
nuclearfusiononearth.blogspot.com/2024/04/carbon-dioxide-never-weather.html
Photosynthesis evolved to metabolise carbon dioxide and into the carbohydrates of life in the cretaceous age are. At the cretaceous mass extinction carbon dioxide was at 10 parts per million.
I'm gonna need an unlimited supply of Xena tapes and hotpockets.
. . . but accelerates the Earth's rotation on weekends.
Wait... so if all humans travelled to the equator and started running in the direction opposite the rotation, would the rotation speed up due to the running or slow down due to the redistribution of the mass?
Climate change kinda caused this question.
Also swimming.
How about a giant highway ring across the equator that lets you drive from Mexico to Thailand or South Africa?
@@rupertchappelle5303 swimming? They can just run across the thin strip of tape holding the planet together.
Duh.
You glober heads are spinning out of control
No, science illiteracy hitched to conservative ideology caused the "question".
I assume this happened every time that each of the ice ages ended and at the height of the ice age, the opposite happened?
@ConontheBinarian why, were you there?
Mass redistribution by any means would cause this effect, yes.
@ConontheBinarian You are not very educated on this topic.
@@crouchjump5787 They were engaging with the conversation humorously. You can understand this from the context of their second comment. Why do you need to speak to others in a patronizing way? What do you get from that?
Probably, we have no way of knowing either way. And in the scheme of things the slowing of the earth's rotation is the least of our problems.
Earth day was only 23 hrs long in the Paleocene. It was already slowing down which causes less warmth to spin up to the poles.
There were no hours in Paleocene :-D
@@user-yy6kc2lb4k Wait how come your reply was posted 3 hours ago and the comment you are replying to is from 2 hours ago? Are you a time traveller?
youtube algorithms are idiotic 😂@@Welgeldiguniekalias
@@WelgeldiguniekaliasRelativistic effects.
@@user-yy6kc2lb4k There may not have been clocks but there were definitely hrs...
Thanks, hopefully the earth will slow, eventually reversing, turning back time, and making us younger. ❤
Except there was no leap-second when we transitioned from 2023 to 2024. The official atomic-time websites explain that earth has not been slowing down as anticipated so the adjustment was not required. So I’m not sure what this new climate scare is about.
There are some papers about the proposition that we should do away with leap seconds entirely; partly because the trends seem to be that we don’t need them (earth appears to be speeding up, surprisingly), and partly because of the complexity of setting back clocks in millions of internet servers. They propose that it would be easier if we just stuck to atomic time and forgot about any synchronization issues with the earth. Now we’re awaiting some kind of world consensus.
Similarly we should stop the summer/winter time madness everywhere
@@thijsvanleeuwen yeah because 2 weeks snow in michigan is normal
Well they say the ice is melting and that will slow the Earth, but it's not slowing, so I guess not as much ice is melting.
And all these "less '(or more)' than estimated" general claims seem to always lead into a theory of self inflicted apocalypse. But it could also mean that our estimates are not very good because we don't really know what the heck is going on.
Most predictions of climate change have been conservative. Reality has been much more apocalyptic.
@@nycbearff Time will tell.
From the studies I've seen, "man is causing climate change because what else could?" and things of that sort. It's extremely lazy and I've seen better highschool BS papers.
@@zanitzeukenWell, what are the alternatives? A Nobel prize await you!
@@zanitzeuken what studies have you seen
BBC had a special last year about earths rotation speeding up! Maybe the time keepers could agree on which It is? Speeding up or slowing down. Once we agree on the basics, then we can start spinning theories about what is causing the change. Or is the change so minor that it falls within the measurement process margin of error.
It never sped up, what you've been told is misleading.
The rate of it slowing down has slowed down. That's what they're calling "speeding up".
I'd really like to know what the estimated error was on the measurements leading to the conclusion that the poles have shifted 80cm over several decades... feels like a very precise measurement for something wehich must be quite hard to measure with a high degree of accuracy?
Sunny Houston said that climate change caused solar eclipse and earthquakes and now this. .
Extreme weather... by slowing the winds! Can't observe this, can only make it up.
Remember folks, wherever you are, it's heating up twice as fast as everywhere else!
Climate activists think they can collectively stop the earthquakes by sticking themselves to the ground.
@@jasongrundy1717total energy is going up, but energy is more equally distributed. She explains it in the video
@@eingyi2500 soo, we are suffering from equally distributed energy?
@@eingyi2500 Jason is referring to articles published in a lot of different countries in their local news papers. All articles claimed that the country the news paper was published in was warming twice as fast as all other countries.
I’ve been waiting for that wind effect. Now project that idea to attempts to generate electricity from ocean tides, waves, currents… ;-)
Obviously you need to eat a lot more baked beans...
@@seriousmaran9414 Bwahahaha!!!
Sorry all. But I wish I had intended it. I might have been able to be funnier! Cheers!
The more we build wind power to harvest energy from wind, the less windy it will be.
@@Munakas-wq3gp it isn't going to affect the wind that much, plus a lot of energy can be obtained from solar, far more than we need, including EV cars.
What is really needed is combined infrastructure, more storage, and faster permission to connect to the grid.
@@seriousmaran9414 It defies logic that harvesting energy out of a system doesn't effect it. It's already seen in geothermal cells which lose effect when the energy gets depleted locally due to the heat-pump operating for a few years.
Thanks for all the info, Sabine! 😊
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
I am now sure one day we will get: Climate Change ate my homework published in scientific journals.
"My head is spinning" 😂😂😂
hihi, says that and afterwards calculates "indefinite causal structures". She´s lovely.
This has to be more complicated. Glaciers have formed and melted before.
Sabine is only human....
@@Anton-tf9iw Im not dissing Sabine or anything. Honestly its a freaky idea and realizing glaciers have melted before helps me stay calm about it.
Apart from the dipolar geomagnetic field switching polarity- which it did very quickly at the Laschamp Event, then back again- curious minds may ask why the Earth has a magnetic field at all, when the outer core, thought to be mainly liquid iron and nickel, is far above the Curie temperature, or demagnetization point(s).
Had to have my daily video of, Sabina. Thanks again, Sabina. Peace ✌️ 😎.
This should have been released on April 1, it's hilarious!
Then again the belief in "the settled science" around many topics that make you pay more and lose rights seems to be the real joke with all of these mainstream topics.
Great video Sabine 👍👍
This is officially my favorite channel.
Good thing I’m American and am used to tasteless beer offerings
A earthquake can speed up and shift the rotation
🤡
a 300 megaton nuke maybe can too?
I thought the negative leap second was for the earth spinning faster? 🤔
The moon is rising in its orbit, and the earth is slowing down, due to the earth's rotational energy being transferred to the moon.
Sea levels have been going up at about 1.5 mm per year for the past 170 years (daily observation). The only way you get acceleration is math tricks, or by changing the observation method. For instance, changing from harbormasters and marks on a stick, to satalite measurements from space. Satalite measure is 3.5 mm per year, and harbormasters don't agree; go figure.
(The cumulative discrepancy between harbormasters and NASA is about two inches. Someone is going to notice.)
I concur. I used Google Chrome for a guess a decade and then I switched to Firefox a couple years ago. But I still had the same issue of too many tabs. So a few months ago I switched to Opera and I have been loving it for all the same reasons that Sabine described.
The Opera browser is owned by China. Everything you do in it will be recorded and noted by the Chinese government.
Opera is awesome. Been using it for years, glad they are a sponsor. Excellent channel
The Opera browser is owned by China. Everything you do in it will be recorded and noted by the Chinese government.
Hey Sabine! I love your videos and sense of humor. You make some very complex concepts understandable. Thank you!
I trust everything Sabine says except that she uses the Opera browser.
I trust everything Sabine says about Physics. And I discount everything she says about climate change.
I've used it off and on over the years, it's been useful. I'll give it a try again.
Using a CCP controlled browser.
+100 social credit
The Opera browser is owned by China. Everything you do in it will be recorded and noted by the Chinese government.
@@freesk8 Same here. It's laughable at this point. Just this past week in the news, some dullard on "The View" connected earthquakes and eclipses to climate change.
Opera is great. I have been using it for years now, and am totally happy with it.
Thanks Sabine, and actually as well as like and discuss (I'm already subscribed) I intend to share your video with a friend at the exact time code you put in for Opera, because I wanted him to see that its not just me that likes and uses Opera (and he's on Ubuntu too now).
As always "hat tip" and thanks
So you can have the axis of rotation wander, which it does, called the precession of the axis, you can have what I think is described here which is the axis wandering a bit [wrt to the universe] due to the movement of water, but you can also have the whole crust shifting where the axis is located on the surface which would also contribute to axis wandering, isn't that right? It's confusing.
And then you have the core shifting, or the whole shifting around the core. Theyve only just changed their mind last year about the nature of the core and its various parts. No current model would accurately predict the changes.
But really, isn’t any motion of the location of the North Pole technically southward? No wonder your head is spinning.
@@charliedulin You could have all kinds of core changes that might not be reflected in what this video is talking about, it could dick with the location of magnetic poles without doing anything to the axis of rotation poles.
Southern land masses (continents) are moving north, so eventually the world will fall upside down due to the extra weight :)
@@axle.student Something tells me you probably saw the spinning wet tennis ball proof of a flat earth. I think a lot of them also think the water would just fall off if it wasn't spinning but I don't want to look because it's just too horrible to contemplate being the same species.
I guess there's no real need to worry about this rotation thing since we are cleverly offsetting the effect by wiping out massive amounts of equatorial rain forest at a fever pitch. I figure it will be a wash in the end.
Can't wait for the giant penguin habitat carbon capture project built from rainforest trees. Which celebrity will be the public face?
@@RandyCampbell-fk3pf Flippant denial is just another form of idiocy.
@@astronautical1082 so is fanatical zealotry...
@@Unmannedair Nothing fanatical about the problem, except in denial and the kind of prideful ignorance behind it. Tell the reader about the importance of biodiversity and trends related to disruptive climate change to know your error is your own.
The earth is 20% greener than in the 80's.
WE ARE SCRUBBING HARDER AS WE EXPAND THE GASES SO THE EARTH SLOWS.
Fascinating!
One of the best illustrations, making the point.You put get efforts into enlightening "us dulls" Thanks! Peace,good health,full pantry,much laughter and sleep to you and yours
There lots of C02 on Mars right now but not on its moon phobos which is just as cold
A lot of confusion. Oponents of wind power claim now, after complaining about "infrasound", that the wind power plants also dangerously calm down the wind, but I think all these effects are teeny tiny. Thanks for the report.
They do calm down the wind of course, but you're right in that it's a very regional and small effect. I don't really see what's dangerous about calm wind tho.
@@SabineHossenfelder . Protesters representing the Kite Flyers Union and the Open Pollinator Society would like to have a word.
Windmills kill birds. Irritates me.
@@MikePhumanaut So do coal plants. So much pollution in addition to CO2, although maybe the modern designs' scrubbers work better.
@@SabineHossenfelder Maybe its that the reduced level of wind allows the land to absorb more heat?- if the planet really is slowing this would add to the effect also. I wonder what would happen to Cloud cover?
♫ ...When I lay me down at night
Knowing we must pay
Thoughts occur that this night might
Stay yesterday
Thoughts that we as humans small
Could slow worlds and end it all
Lie around me where they fall... ♫
I've told about it years ago: The mass redistributes would soon cause, more important than changes rotation, big changes than come among others, changes sea lever very different depending the far from ecuator, more earthquakes and tsunamis to come back to balance, and changes in atmosphere. But as usual, no one listens to me
In 2021 they claim it was the moon that slowed Earth's rotation lol
The moon is slowly moving away from the earth. I believe the figure is something like 8" 200cm-ish a year. Over the years this will have an effect on the earths rotation and, I would expect, seismic activity.
Trouble is our, so called, scientists always latch on to something to promote the current mantra. I'm sure there will be large government grants to pursue the climate B/S.
Well that's still the case?
@@Ryan-jn2os the moon is being pulled away from us ever so slowly .... I kind of thought this was common knowledge. That same force is slowing Earth's rotation. The moons rotation has slowed for example are you telling me that there's any usable atmosphere on the moon?
Who is they?
@@Arisaem so many like scientists from NASA who looked at extremely old records of moon position & shadows to actually get the opposite idea. Including stating that the climate change and melting would speed up rotation to somewhat offset it
My shoelaces are comming undone more often due to climate change.
When a hurricane stalls, the damage where it sits is multiplied. Same goes for thunderstorms - when they don't move, it will flood an area with feet of water, instead of inches.
If a storm is a hurricane, wouldn't that imply it to be a thunderstorm?
@@Apollorion No. A hurricane is a large rotating mass of air & water.
@@larry785And so is the Earth's atmosphere.
But due to the relevant high speeds of the winds occurring in a hurricane together with the enormous rainfall also occurring there, I'd say it still is a storm. It also evolved from a tropical storm by growing in strength and size whilst over hot waters.
The other day I was facing east and dropped a fluffer.
A. Did I speed up or slow down the rotation?
B. Did I create a hurricane in some other country?
C. Will my friends ever find out?
Actually, ice floats in the sea thus lying above the mean water level of the sea. Thus when it melts it will decrease the angular momentum and speed the earth up, not slow it down.
Sure. But most of the ice on Earth was previously concentrated near the North and South poles, which lies nearer to the axis of rotation of Earth. You do not find random icebergs floating along the Equator. So when this ice melts on the poles, the liquid mass tends to distribute itself along the equator and thus slows down the rotation of Earth.
That is one counterargument to your rebuttal.
The other counterargument is: suppose that ice is indeed present along the Equator, and this ice melts, it would be more-or-less inconsequential to the angular momentum since the mass distribution along the radius is barely affected (as much as redistribution from nearer the axis of rotation anyway)-- the solid ice has exactly the same mass as the liquid water. Sure, one can of course argue that "technically, there would still consequentially be a slight change in angular velocity", so for the sake of argument, "yes, one would be technically correct".
Yeah. Besides sea surface height is being monitored by satellites and one look at such map proves that the claim of water from melting ice moving to equator is baseless and the whole study is practically useful only as toilet paper (if you first soften the paper with water from melting ice)
You mean the angular speed. The angular momentum is conserved.
you do know they take into account all the pluses and minuses. We also emit cooling gases, we have to use those in our calcs of total AGW. If you want to submit a proper paper debunking them, id love to read it and then watch sabine's eventual video on it.
@@AstralTraveler You have read the paper ?-all of it?
Winds calming down, rotation slower, mantle faster, I'm super confused.
Compensation is that heads and minds are spinning in opposite directions, right?
And the worst thing is the effect on coriolis power.
Bad news for students and exams.
Question. Would that be the interaction of the Climate change multiplier. Leading up to the stalling of the Ocean currents. The amount of mass of the oceans stopping their circulating patterns should be the largest (Proportional) amount interacting with the Earth / Moon rotational decay. Question?
I enjoy your sense of humor.
Back in the 70s the poles were growing
Not under communism
At this point, I'm convinced they will blame my messy morning shits on climate change.
Oh, how fascinating climate science can be!
The it's the beauty of chaotic systems!
And how do we know this isn't a normal cycle of the planet? If it's 3 years later than the PREDICTION, then the prediction was wrong!! How is that not a POSSIBLE alternative explanation?
Clearly there's no point in explaining this to you because you're a science denier, but it's plain and simple if you just look at the graph. It has always gone up pretty regularly. Now it's hit a plateau and is going down. Clearly something has changed.
@@Zombie-lx3sh Science denier? Oh, yes. OK. Ad hominem attacker.
@@Zombie-lx3sh Yes, the earth's normal cycle has advanced a bit. That's whats changed.
I’ve just retired and have nothing to do and all day to do it in, a day here and there is nothing to me most days I have check what day it is.
Thank you!
Finally some good news about climate change. I always did feel like the days were too short.
Wait a minute, so you just said that the angular momentum is conserved across the core the surface the atmosphere and the water... So it didn't slow down... The surface slowed down and something else sped up. And that could have been a lot of things. Seems a bit premature to blame it on climate change when we haven't even got the core mapped properly. 🤨
How do we know this change didn't happen because of some geophysical alteration in the mantle?
Sunny Houston said that climate change caused solar eclipse and earthquakes and now this. 😅
Didn't watch it she explains how it works
Sunny is as good with science as she is fair.
Sunny Houston is a TV Host, not a scientist. Sabine talks about science. You talk about cultural wars.
Climate change can cause earthquakes. Consider this - as we remove tons of mass from the poles, they experience uplift while as all that mass collects on the equator in the form of liquid - it will push down on the crust. Obviously this could definitely cause shifts in plate tectonics.
@@Arisaem This video has nothing too do with earthquakes caused by climate change. It's about redistribution of mass to the equators and that's slowing down the rotation by a very tiny amount. Milliseconds we are talking here just watch the video people.
This is excellent news, I need more time in my day!
It is really fascinating that a species can impact the Earth in such ways. It’s a little horrifying to be that species. If it was another species we could just force them to stop with violence since that is something we are exceedingly good at. How do we stop ourselves?
That's if it's true and as for other species they have damage their environment in the past which lead to population reduction, so natural self regulation of the environment
You’re not wrong, it is the difference of scale that is striking to me.
If the rotation would have sped up, that would have been blamed on climate change too
Yeah centrifugal force is a density identity for air if the air density expands it increases heat. And it's an indication to a decrease in gravity a pound force expression to mass distribution over a volume. In the form of air. With or without a measurement. A visual method is seen and used when expressing physics.
As T²/R³ is an expression of astronomical unit representation to inertia and what part rotation period plays in inertia. Both in rotation period daily and rotation period yearly in Intermediate axis. Revolutionary or not. A ration of identity is used for the calender cross section identity of the physics in the field in relation to daily living. 365 days as 365/1 and 1/365
1/360 1/100 all equatable fractals to retranslate the subject of sub language imagery to it's purpose
A day
One reciprocal expression of intermediate axis
Intermediate axis: timely quoted Dvanebikov effect or tennis racket theorum
3.33333333 1.66666666666 6.666666666 ratios to equate a circumference in arc travel to a diameter length.
The year flips in the same way
It's midpoints can be seen at the seasonal high noons
Jun 21 and Dec 21 the sun sits at 12oclock dead center of the sky 2x the entire year. Not every day
The sun visually rolled backwards and forwards again
They say...due to axis tilt.
I say it's a pole flip as Dvanebikov effect intermediate axis that occurs in like 2 hours
The moment it's sitting still. It's spinning you. It tracks back (that does go against rotation polarity laws for rigid body gyroscopics and it recorrects it's orientation. 2x a year. Natural. Ignored.
The same has been true periodically for millions of years, due to the fact, that for some time now, most of the land has been drifting towards the northern half of the globe and that on the other hand 6:04 leaves “climb” the tread in spring and sommer and fall down in a autumn and Winter. I lost the link, but as I remember, that accounts for some milliseconds difference, too. And, of course, there was COVID, with thousands of planes staying on the ground.
4:12 typo. Mantel is the shelf above a fireplace. Mantle is (among other things) the layer of Earth below the crust.
Hmm, I wonder who was the funding agency behind the "study"?
Nice to see climate change is the catch all for all perceived problems. Funny how just a couple of months ago I was reading a headline that said the Earth's rotation was speeding up and clocks couldn't keep up. The junk that makes headlines is really getting out of control. 🤦♂
when academia is nothing but D ei hires and wokies you get this
@@rhetorical1488 Laughably inept right wing idiocy. "Woke" is another term for developmental maturity and conservatives lack it as badly as the symbol they want to normalize immaturity; the former president.
@@astronautical1082 found the triggered snowflake with terminal tds🤣 how unnatural is your hair color.
@@astronautical1082 Both can be true.
It's because we've had the shortest day on record in the past two years. Set a new record (2022) and broke it the next year (2023).
That was a measurement. She's talking about a hypothesis or maybe a theory, about what might happen when xyz happens.
? Slower rotation ought to influence magnetic fields and van Allen belts too?
Thank you for looking at this! I've wondered how the redistribution of water, may affect the earth. I had not thought of how our wells, have contributed to this; but mostly about the artics. And I was curious if it has an affect on tectonic plates and potentially volcanism. And it sounds like it does, sense it is affecting the earth core, crust, rotation speed etc. Caring about how it affects people around the world.
I love this channel's insights, language, clarity, humor, etc. Thanks so much.
Wind speeds are predicted to go down, but hurricanes are definitely going up. Yep that climate clap trap for you.
"Climate change slows expansion of Universe" well placed sources
say.
Somebody wrote in 62' "The Earth makes, my friend, the blowing of the wind" and they gave him a Nobel for this
I've been using Opera for years. 😊👍
Except Antarctic sea ice coverage is currently at a 20 years high!! By hey why bother with facts...
I find it funny that Sabina complained about the screwed up state of the sciences a few videos back, but swallows every climate change study hook, line and sinker.
As they said in BSG, "This has happened before, and it will happen again."
I predicted this ages ago and published it in several youtube comments. Heat makes things expand. A warming earth therefore gets bigger, so like the dancer analogy, slows down to conserve angular momentum.
I also predict that unless we curb warming, at some time the crust will reach its elastic limit resulting in massive earthquakes all over the world.
But no one listens to me.
C'mon Sabine - We just broke modern records of the shortest and second shortest days in June and July of 2022 - This climate hysteria is just out of control. Google the island of Tuvalu that climate scientists said was going to shrink or disappear but was just reported to have grown larger. Please track down a copy of the movie "Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth)" on RUclips that was recently released that includes PhD researchers in the climate field using government data.
lmao. you only need 3 names to be absolutely certain that climate change exists and is bad... Eunice Newton Foote, Tyndall and Hansen.
I can tell you now that the 'climate hysteria' is very much under played not over.
Most people will refer to the IPCC. but we can safely say that they are clearly wrong now.
We have Hansen's latest work, an actual quantum physics explaination of why co2 is so good at heat trapping.
And now there is another climate paper confirming Hansen's Forcings.
Even if we went carbon zero today... the earth will continue to heat at a rate of at least 11 hiroshima bombs per second until such time as we reach the CURRENT +10 thermostat based on the new climate forcing.
NONE of these claims of this warming or this sinking or that bleaching mean a damn thing. The climate is so massive and has so many nuances and even counter tipping points that it is EXCEPTIONALLY hard to predict such things because the earth may move that heat somewhere unexpected.
The earth itself has countered many of our fear with sinks we did not even know existed....but we have been given all possible chances by nature to correct our mistake. Too late now, hothouse is certain and people alive today that you care for will starve to death before we die of old age.
If you do not believe this then you simply have not learned enough about the immutable physics of it all that has absolutely nothing to do with human opinions on what will happen and when.
Science will do it's absolute best to give us accurate data, but it can only be as accurate as reality and if the earth itself throws a curveball then of course predictions will be misplaced.
what most people do not even register is that we are already about 3.5 if you remove all the dimming. It is already over as soon as we hit a war or pandemic or civil unrest enough to reduce industry.
Copium is bad for your health, you know?
Did Prager fund that? 😂
Suggestion, put on a new shirt and wash that old tie die pinky that’s been over used by now! Certainly the counter rotation of the laundry bin will contribute to climate change and slow the rotation of the planet 🌎, after all we all use a little change couldn’t we?
This means that the days are longer.
Still 24 hours, but longer.
Each seconds takes more time to switch to the other.
OPERA looks interesting! I love opera!
Oh brother! Big thumbs down for feeding the completely unnecessary "climate change" hysteria beast!
Your view’s becoming increasingly aged over time as the effects of our insatiable consumption of fossil fuels continue.
The global south are in much less denial about our predicament because it’s hitting them harder, however if it hasn’t been so obvious for you yet it soon will be.
Cope
You guy are so ridiculous, if topic climate is named you're attracted to that like flies are attracted to a heap of shit, to make a bit trouble. Happily not successful🤣
Conservatives are like little, noisy children except for the obesity.
Weak minded, what are you doing in a science channel if you can't cope with how science works?
The part with "the next leap second will also be the first negative leap second" confused me. Looking closely at the graph (and its colors) clarified it. It is predicted to be a negative leap second anyway, i.e., the rotation is getting faster anyway (after a period of slowing down), but is doing so somewhat _later_ because of the climate change.
Awesome! Now I will have more time to get things done and the warmer it gets, the more time I can wear my speedos.
always my first stop for comic relief
Negarive leap seconds? Congratulations, you gave every software engineer a new nightmare.
I knew it would eventually be known. I figured we’d be slowing down because of several things. Think about how air vibrates when heated and doesn’t flow well when it’s so hot and mixed with stuff. It’s a bit more unstable and ruins the flow and then a cascade could happen where we can’t stop it.
You can also group tabs in chrome :) Do like the idea of workspaces in opera though.
3:51 Lucky we are creating all those wind-farm generators ;)
I wonder what the cloud cover will be like in the future :)
Slower rotation sounds good for the economy. We'll have more time per day to work!
No ,more hours of work doesn't equate more productive it's actually less especially with less sleep
This makes this whole ULT thing so weird to me. The graph indicates that the rotation slows somewhere in the ball park of 1 millisecond per day, and we seem fine in adjusting positioning satellites etc to that, but NASA makes such a fuss over a 58 micro(!)second time dilation per day on the moon that they urgently need a Universal Lunar Time?
Why??
Fascinating talk. Maybe I should try Opera again? I've been using Firefox, Chrome and Safari for decades. I still like Firefox, and Chrome is not bad, but I'll try Opera.
Thank you for highlighting the exceedingly irrelevant studies of climate loons Sabine! Always a good time!
and i have a serious question. why did they find polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the rossetta mission to 67p when polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are what comes off of my bbq when i cook meat? just kinda wondering. thanks.
In the title photo, I read: ‘small humans big insects.’
God forbid they consider the original prediction was wrong.
It’s probably better to refer to the relative angular accelerations of the various layers of the earth.
In summary, the article states that climate change is *helping* UTC time keepers by delaying the need for a negative leap second from mid-2025 to 2029.
Hi Sabine. I’m interested in you making a video about abiogenesis. How did life from atoms?
What is that mechanism in physics that allows life to form? What type of energy sustains life? If it’s not the usual electromagnetism, nuclear energy, etc that we understand through physics
I mean, no special energy sustains life, if that's what you're talking about.
Sunlight? Chemicals from the earth? Water?
@@Hudoi-1 How is chemical energy that sustains life harnessed? Whats a plausible mechanism for which life can arise from inorganic material?
We understand so much about physics and law of the universe, but it doesn’t explain the process or emergence of “life”. Forget evolution of life, the question of how did life emerge at all is a big mystery.
Why can’t we make our own self sustaining life ?
@@aznstride4325 No, it isn't a mystery. Just... Research it. If you wanna know, just start on the wiki page for abiogenesis. It isn't "solved", but it's not like we don't know how life came about at all. There are many theories, but it's hard to know exactly because we literally can only guess - or we'd need a time machine.
And the reason why we can't make our own "self-sustaining" life is because we can't manipulate small enough molecules with enough precision to mass produce such things as DNA/RNA, required to make life. Life is pretty complex as it is.
@@aznstride4325 There is nothing about life that we cannot reproduce.
We just can't manipulate matter well enough.
@@Hudoi-1 it’s a big mystery. Origin of life is probably one of the biggest mystery along side physics unification (which won’t solve it)
We aren’t completely clueless, we can make RNA but it’s extremely complex to do anything more than that. The theories we have are extremely limited and the environmental conditions required by the theory weren’t conditions that existed in early earth.
I would say we’re extremely clueless still. But yes progress is being made, but this is an interesting topic (at least for me) to talk about
Multiple monitors also help with your browsing habits if someone falls into the habit of loading up so many tabs that their name disappears.
Instead of browser tabs, pull them all out of the browser as their own respective window and use a vertical taskbar. Though, that's not for everybody.
City of Rio de Janeiro was the last Sommer max temp 56°C and velt as 62,3°C 🔥
that is great i do not want to go to bed too early
Its odd because the other study was said opposite. It sped up. However, the waterway flow was from pre-existing situation. Superior, china river, or any that was spread by man. Both to slow the affect of climate under damaging concern..