Multiple Regression in SPSS - R Square; P-Value; ANOVA F; Beta (Part 2 of 3)

This video illustrates how to perform and interpret a multiple regression statistical analysis in SPSS.
Multiple Regression
Regression
R-Squared
ANOVA table
Regression Weight
Beta Weight
Predicted Value
Video Transcript: and the ANOVA table is a test of whether this R-squared is significantly greater than 0. And if you look at the table here, what we want to do is we want to look at the column labeled Sig., and if this p value here which is what this is, is less than .05, then that means that the test is significant, the regression's significant, in other words, R-squared is significantly greater than 0. So since this is less than .05, we know that this value of R-squared is significantly greater than 0, and that means that our predictors are able to account for a significant amount of variance in college GPA. So, in other words, the regression model is significant. And we could interpret the results of the ANOVA table as follows, and you'll often see this written up in research reports or journal articles as the following, the overall regression model was significant and then here we have F 3 and 26, which you can see right here under df for Regression and Residual, respectively. Then we have an F value of 8.51, which you see here reported under F, and I rounded it to two decimal places. And then p is less than .001, since we see SPSS is rounded down here to .000, since it was less than .005. And then I also put the R-squared here at the end. This is very typical to do this, R-squared equals .50. And that of course came from the Model Summary table. OK so once again this tells us, overall, our regression analysis was statistically significant. When I take those three predictors together as a group, they predict college GPA significantly. Next we'll look at the Coefficients table. And this is the table now where, those first two tables, Model Summary and ANOVA, looked at the regression analysis overall, or the predictors taken as a set, the Coefficients table looks at each of the predictors individually. So whether a given predictor was significant on its own right, and so forth. And what we do here is we're going to look at each of our predictors and we want to zero in on the Sig. column, once again, which are the p-values for each of the tests. Now in this analysis the Constant is not important to us whatsoever. What we want to focus on are the three p values for SAT score, social support, and gender. So we're going to evaluate each of these tests at an alpha of .05. So looking at SAT score, we can see that that p-value which was rounded down to .000 and you can see in the yellow box there the exact value. This was definitely less than point .05, so that is significant. SAT score is a significant predictor of college GPA. And in just a few moments I'll explain exactly what that means. But let's go and look at the next two predictors first. Social support, with a p-value of .024, is also a significant predictor of college GPA, since this p-value is less than .05. And then finally, gender, with a p-value of .658, is not a significant predictor of college GPA. And that's not really that surprising if we think about it, because males and females typically don't differ significantly in their overall GPA in college. But I wanted to include this variable both to give you an example of a dichotomous variable and so that you could also see what a non-significant result looks like. We could summarize the results of the Coefficients table as follows,
RUclips Channel (Quantitative Specialists): / statisticsinstructor
Subscribe today!
RUclips channel: / statisticsinstructor
Inferential course: www.udemy.com/...
Descriptives course: www.udemy.com/...

[@georgiaemily7]

YOU ARE THE MAN!!!!!!!!! THE GOD OF STATS!!!!!! MY HERO!!!!!!!

[@mutonyig]

More than a man and a guru himself

[@hoangnguyenhuy2700]

Thank you very much, I am appreciating of what you did although it was 6 years from now.

[@mutonyig]

Thanks for simplifying what other videos are making look like rocket science

[@education_research101_optimism]

Thank you so much for the valuable knowledge and skills in statistical analysis.

[@ordinarygirl1087]

man you are the best i want to hug you lol thank youuuuuuuuuu

[@jackshepherd1211]

youve saved my life

[@alistairelias536]

This channel is the real deal.

[@ginnysinclair3289]

It would be great to have a video explaining how to read data that is not significant

[@angelaong685]

OMG!!! You saved my day. Thank you so much for this video

[@nofanfelani6924]

on the ANOVA table, what does the F value means?

[@dinaparker4560]

Very well done, Thank you.

[@nataliavoronova158]

Huge thanks!

[@christopheranderson1968]

Is .047 statistically significant? I'm no good sorting these sorts of numbers out.

[@kaohsiung99]

Typically, any value below .05 is significant. It's like saying we have a 5% chance of being wrong. In your case, it's like saying you are okay with the 4.7% chance of being wrong. That means you have a 95.3% chance of your hypothesis/model being correct.

[@user-jz2zh4ei5u]

if the hypothesis is directional, would the sig in ANOVA need to be halved before considering the real significance level？

[@sabeenabanoraein3339]

Very good 👍

[@mariajauslin1107]

but significant is not good right? I mean when the test is significant, this means that the Ho can be rejected?

[@kaohsiung99]

Typically, we want to reject the Ho. It means that our research question has been answered in the way we suspected it would be.

[@aqsashabbir1380]

Hi sir... I want to ask question from u.. My model have 5 IDV and 1 ID.. 4 IDV have signfcnt.. But one is insig. But all varibles have postve corelation... So what can i do now.. this model is good or not? And how to interprate in writing?

[@TonyStark-of8uw]

What is the difference in earning between male and female, given gender (female= 1) coefficient is -4 and intercep is 6?

[@tankgrl1980]

How do you get r2 and ANOVA table using UNIANOVA syntax?

[@sajeeb2005]

Here Gender is non-metric variable. so , Dummy coding should be done in this model rather using directly multiple regresssion.

[@syakierajml632]

If the anova table sig is shown as

[@csPinKie]

Nope, basically th e same

[@lettersforkumar]

why you didnt dummy code the categorical variable Gender? misleading example.

[@muffinsniper]

Because a categorical variable like gender has only two values and therefore needs no dummy coding? misleading comment.

[@jhabib39]

You are a natural communicator. Thanks soooo much!

[@SwaniSJ]

What's (Constant)?

[@collateralDamage111]

the Y axis intercept

[@medicalhealthcenter327]

Aa