Hawaii gets robbed of one of the most insane comebacks in basketball history
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- During the college basketball game between Hawaii and Texas A&M Commerce, Hawaii trailed 53-46 with just 13 seconds left. They then scored a layup with under four seconds left to make it 53-48. They then got the bal back after an errant Texas A&M Commerce inbounds pass went out of bounds. They quickly hit a three to make it 53-51 with 1.8 seconds left. Then, Texas A&M Commerce somehow turned the ball over again on the inbounds pass and Hawaii secured the ball and hit the buzzer beating three to win it 54-53... but the refs blew the whistle before the shot as they ruled the Texas A&M Commerce player who touched the ball on the play was out of bounds. However, upon replay it was clear that he was not even close to being out of bounds. Hawaii instead how to inbound the ball but missed the potential game winning three and lost 53-51 in heartbreaking fashion.
Get your SportzCases here! - sportzcases.com?aff=203
Promo Code for 10% off: Procentral
Make sure to comment suggestions for future videos below. Enjoy!
Outro Song: https: • Congratulations (Instr...
Twitter: / psc_highlights
Instagram: / psc_highlights
Business Email: jaymichael23yt@gmail.com
(All rights go to ESPN, Fox, CBS, Universal Music Group, the NFL, NBA, NCAA & it's broadcasters. I do not own the music and the footage used in this video. No copyright infringement intended. For entertainment purposes only)
#CollegeBasketball
I have never seen that big of a late whistle for an out of bounds play in my life, and the ref wasn’t even looking at the play
@@AsylumSaint ok Sherlock, how is it hard to blow a whistle if you get hit him the head🤡
@@AsylumSaint lights knocked out? What were you watching
tell us all you know nothing about officiating without telling us you know nothing about officiating.
@@AsylumSaint if you don’t see the player or ball go out of bounce, you don’t call it. There are other refs and reviews for that reason.
In the nfl, if you are not 100% sure that it is an incomplete pass, you call it a fumble and potentially overturn the review later.
@@AsylumSaint my point is that the ref doesn’t see the player touching the ball as he is bumped by the player. If he tipped the ball back in and ran into the ref a millisecond after it would have been in bounds. One of the other refs should have made the call or the ref who called it out should have waited to review it. The other refs know the rules and were probably just waiting for the game to end to review it to avoid making the wrong call.
Hawaii’s sportsmanship at the conclusion of the game…respect.
Yea. It’s a tough sport to officiate. Cause if u blow the whistle, u have to call something, not like football where u can pick up flags.
Review the play after just like you do when a buzzer beater is hit
The ball was out of bounds, the ref knew it was because the player with the ball touched the ref who was out of bounds
They did. That's why they got the ball with 1.8 seconds left
@@duncachinoahimiha3889 the ball never went out of bounds 🤦🏻♂️.. and you can contact an official who is out of bounds and still be in bounds. It’s only out of bounds if the ball touches the referee directly. If someone was deemed out of bounds just for touching a person who is out of bounds then defenses could just step out of bounds and touch the person with the ball.
@@duncachinoahimiha3889 bro what LMAO. If a player is in the air, the ball is still in bounds. You know nothing about basketball. The ball can be over the baseline if the player does not make contact with the ground. The ref shouldn't have been standing there, the player never made contact with the floor with posession of the ball over the baseline. You are goofy asf.
The ironic thing is that the entire Hawaii coaching staff was screaming at the referee to blow the whistle for the out of bounds call. He blows the whistle right as the guy makes the shot. Then they’re like “Why did you blow the whistle!?”
That's hilarious.
Good point.
They wanted him to blow it when the guy caught it but he didn’t and Hawaii made the shot then he finally blows it
@@bouncyhousestudios9421i mean he blew the whistle before he made the shot to be fair
To be fair the head coach was only upset that he blew the whistle. He didn't complain about the out of bounds
Everyone: Going bonkers
Ref: Whistles at the exact moment he shot
When things like this are clearly wrong, the NCAA should have the power to override it.
Actually, this was the correct call. The official is contacted when he was out of bounds, which by rule is out of bounds.
@@BigCManMusic True. Ref shouldn't be standing in bounds on the play though. He had half his body on the field of play instead of getting out of the way.
@@BigCManMusic I mean like half
Of one foot is why is he standing next to the inbounder? His fuckup lead to a stupid but legit call it is his fault ultimately stop feeling sorry for the retard
This was clearly right
@@BigCManMusic Even when half of him is in bounds?
I had a bet on Texas A&M commerce but after seeing this I kind of wish this comeback happened. That’s insane
If you're placing bets on this game you may (definitely do) have a serious gambling problem
Absolute degenerate behavior
Everyone’s a critic lol
Who the hell bets on Texas A&M commerce?
Dude is likely lying. Hawaii was favored by 10.5.
For those wondering, here is the rule straight from the rule book:
Rule 7:
Section 1. Out of Bounds-Player, Ball
Art. 1. A player shall be out of bounds when he touches the floor or any object
other than a person on or outside a boundary line. An airborne player’s status
shall be where he was last in contact with the floor.
Art. 2. The ball shall be out of bounds when it touches a player who is out of
bounds, any other person, the floor or any object on or outside a boundary, the
supports or back of the backboard, or the ceiling or overhead equipment.
Art. 3. The ball shall be out of bounds when any part of the ball passes over the
backboard from any direction.
A player can touch another person out of bounds, but the ball cannot. Since only the player touched the referee and not the ball, It is not ruled out of bounds and play should have continued. By the letter of the law, Hawaii was robbed.
ref should have gotten out of the fking way
@@lilgoalie7 Totally! It's really weird, I am a high school referee, and the first lesson I was told was to always keep the entire play of field in front of you and NEVER let a player be behind you. Really strange positioning by the ref to be in the way like that.
It sucks but look at the coaches for Hawaii screaming at the ref to blow it dead because he was “out of bounds.” It sucks but had they not maybe he doesn’t blow it. Humans can be persuaded due to pressure especially if they didn’t witness it. Hopefully it doesn’t cost them a spot in the dance
Unfortunately the guy travelled to get behind the 3-point line, so the shot shouldn't have counted either way. At least with the out-of-bounds they had a better chance to win. Too bad they came up short. Everybody loves a good comeback.
While I conceptually agree to the letter of the law, I think this in praxis isn't full proof. Had the shot missed - I'm sure the public opinion would swing the other way in wanting the out of bounds call, which in my opinion, is a pretty favorable outcome in general.
The issue is that by these literal rules, one could make a case that players/coaches/refs could just hold up or push players back into the lines of the court on late game plays/traps to keep balance or keep the game in play.
Realistically, I see this mostly the refs fault for even being that close to the situation. Ultimately, I think the refs reviewed and called a logical call because even if he wasn't there, that player probably would have 1) stepped out of bounds, or 2) thrown the ball up and wasted a significant amount of time + a more unfavorable shot. The refs may have even been able to call a re-play because the ref interfered very evidently with the play.
Definitely sucks, but a 1.8s inbounds opportunity isn't so bad of a consolation either.
Should have ran a play for the guy that already made the shot
They did. #3 was open to the left of the big man that (for some reason) decided to take a fadeaway 3 from NBA range. SMH.
When I saw the score and time I thought you uploaded the wrong video. Hawaii should've had an all-timer
For anyone saying they were robbed: rules state that if player/ball contacts an official standing out of bounds, the play is dead and the ball is out of bounds
THANK YOU!!! So many idiots here getting their panties in a bunch in a game involving teams they don't follow/care about when they don't even know the rules and just want to hate on referees any chance they can...
@@KG-xt4oq The ref was standing in bounds though which was shitty. Technically the correct call, but get out of the field of play when the ball comes at you moron lol
That is the rule, YET this is a microcosm of what is wrong in today's world. Use common sense instead of going into "Chapter 5; paragraph 11; sub-section 2"
Soft as bunnies.
@@kalen1702 So where is he supposed to stand? How is he supposed to know where the players are going and where the ball is being passed? The coaches and players were screaming for an out of bounds call, then changed their tune when dude hit the shot, which wouldn't count anyway...the clock pauses at 00.7 seconds, so there's no way the shot would have been out of players hand before time runs out.
@@KG-xt4oq just sayin he sees the ball coming at him and moves towards the field of play instead of into the out of bounds section. Just thought that was odd reaction that caused the confusion that followed
I’ve got sympathy for the official here. He blew his whistle late because he got bumped into and almost fell over. The bench started yelling at him to make a call and he thought he saw the player step out of bounds with the ball. He got it wrong, but he didn’t have much to work with. It’s a tough job.
I don’t feel bad for the official at all, should be held accountable if anything.
@@patrickmosley9456 The Hawaii bench got exactly what they wanted. Had he not blown it and the kid shot an air ball out of bounds you’d be hissy the other way. Can’t win with fans
Bruh what. It was the refs fault for not being out of bounds. His negligence caused a violation to happen that robbed Hawaii of a game winner. Ref doesn’t deserve sympathy
The clock delayed a little at :0.7
1. the player traveled on the 3 even if they had let it play on.
2. the ref was standing out of bounds and the player touched him with the ball in hands, by rule the ball is dead right there.
3. because someone will say the ref was in the wrong spot, he is exactly where officiating teams tell you to stand, it was just a terrible inbounds pass.
learn the rules before you start complaining 😂
I thought that was a travel !
Well, for one, the official is in play, and he was standing out of bounds, so out of bounds to Hawaii is the right call.
For two, the shot wouldn't have counted anyway because the clock operator stopped it at 0.7 for just long enough for the player to get the shot off. He wouldn't have been able to with a running clock. If you count it out, the player had just left the ground and was on his way up when the clock actually hit zeroes, ball still completely in hand.
Hawaii should've drawn up a better play on the inbounds for that last attempt if they wanted to win. They didn't get robbed at all.
Yeah, 100% correct. Also Hawaii can’t complain when their coaches on the bench are screaming for them to call the out of bounds.
literally heartbreaking
Ref thought he stepped out just like #44 on Hawaii did too 😂
Same guy that airballed the redemption three LMAO
I reffed for a little bit. That ref should have never been in-bounds, or at least should have the ability to get out of the way. He was completely out of position. Baffling mistake from a D1 ref.
Hawaii kid traveled on the inadvertent whistle, anyway
It sucks for Hawaii but I think that was the right call. Player had the ball and made contact with ref who was out of bounds, so it’s a dead ball/out of bounds.
Correct
The referee should have backed up but didn't even see the ball coming
@@10thletter40 Agreed. Horrible job by the ref in not getting out of the way of the player. He can't ignore the out-of-bounds because of that.
A player shall be out of bounds when he touches the floor or any object other than a person on or outside a boundary line
A ref is a person, so it doesn’t count as out of bounds
No one cares
It's embarrassing for me to watch as a Knicks fan, but I think I'm about to rewatch the clip of Reggie Miller's 8 in 8.9 at the Garden.
T-mac it'll help
It looked like he was touching the ball and the ref at the same time. Since the ref is out of bounds and considered part of the floor, player is out of bounds.
So you're telling me that there would be a possibility when a player touches the ref that they'd have to review whether or not the ref's shoes were out of bounds?
yup. unfortunately for hawai'i this is the correct call. you know the rules
yeah this. could’ve been amazing though. tough!
I don't think that's correct, that only applies if the ball touches the ref. If that's a player standing there, it's not out of bounds.
@@AB-lc5ve i see your point. looked it up: “The player is out-of-bounds when he touches the floor or any object on or outside a boundary.” the player was touching the ball and the ref who was out of bounds at the same time, so it is out of bounds, correct call. but a bummer nonetheless.
I had Hawaii live ML and had no idea this happened….
Maybe if the whole bench wasn’t screaming out of bounds to the ref, he wouldn’t have called it. Teams own staff set them up.
Dang after this shot, Jovon hits an actual GW on Christmas!
Replays are needed
How come every vid on this channel either has 2 ads or a 15 second no skip ad?
they didnt even argue
To be fair, if the ref hadn't been there I doubt the player that ran into him would have fumbled the ball like he did.
Here’s what I think happened:
- Referee gets hit by commerce player
- As he gets hit, he flinches. In this case his eyes are likely closed in a the fraction of a second
- By the time his eyes are opened, he’s more worried about falling over and starts preparing his hands for the ground. You can see his hands start to move downwards in order to break his fall.
- While looking at the ground, Hawaii’s bench starts freaking out and pointing at the ground. Likely trying to argue for an out of bounds call. And at the same time the 3 is hit.
- So in that case, the only thing the ref sees after being hit by the Commerce player is the bench asking for a call. Ref assumes that out of bounds is the call he has to make (split-second adrenaline call) since it’s the only thing he’s seeing happening in front of him. No it’s not the correct call, but given the situation and information he’s able to take in: it’s the only call he dan reasonably make. (Side note: Hawaii’s bench was wrong about the out of bounds too if that’s what they are motioning for)
You know that ref got jumped after
That's why he will never make it past this level.
That is sickening 😳clearly in bounds
Ref is part of the floor and he still was touching the ball and ref at the same time. Since the ref was out of bounds, sonis the player
@@mdave9018 no the ball has to touch the ref
@@mdave9018 - the problem is that the referee was standing with one foot in bounds, and should not have been standing in bounds at all. Hawaii was punished for that mistake by the ref; how will that ref be punished? Not at all is my guess.
This is kinda poor positioning by the official, but it’s unfortunately the right call. The player touching the ball touched the official while the ref was out of bounds. The official is considered part of the floor so that makes the ball out of bounds. That’s the rule
The official probably should have been a step or two back but he is on the table/bench side, so he doesn't have a lot of room over there to work with. He has to assume he will be running down the court, not standing there for the entire play. But you're right: the blue player was out of bounds when he touched the official, who is out of bounds, so it's white's ball at the spot. The call was correct. Nobody got robbed. I'll never get over the idea that people's first instinct is to believe that the officials are wrong. As if a 3 point shot should just count because...it went in? Not understanding why it should count here. Ball is dead, whistle wasn't blown because official was hit by a player and for a split second didn't realize where he was. If he blows his whistle immediately and is inbounds, THEN he would have screwed up (no violation), but I guess if there was no shot, no one would have noticed. So then it would be OK?
that’s actually incorrect. If the ball touches the ref who’s out of bounds, the ball is out. In this scenario the player touched the ref. It was the wrong call
@@pinhead9196 the player is touching the ref while still touching the ball which in extension means the ref is touching the ball.
@@pinhead9196 you're right! I stand corrected. They changed the rule at some point within the last decade. The last time I worked NCAA the rule was different. From the 2007 rule book: "Art. 1. A player shall be out of bounds when he or she touches the floor or any object other than a player on or outside a boundary line." This is from Rule 7, which I forgot about as well. At some point the committees for both men and women changed "player" to person. I haven't paid enough attention to rules changes during that time (this is more of what they call editorial change).
So it doesn’t matter that the players feet were in bounds?
That ref would be getting a nice break from officiating if I were the commissioner of that association. Some things wrong here: 1. He's not even looking at the play anyway when the "catch and save" happens. 3. He gets contacted by a Texas A&M Commerce player, not the ball, while the official is standing out of bounds. For that play to properly be ruled to be out of bounds, the ref would have to have been hit by the ball or the player would have to hit the floor or an object which is out of bounds (Not a person out of bounds), while in contact with the ball OR the player be in the air when contacting the ball after the player was last in contact with an object or the floor out of bounds. None of this was the case. Total blown call and even worse since the ref wasn't looking at the play at all.
this is the most tamu-c way of winning a basketball game ever
You telling me this is a real school?
Ref's need to be held accountable... That's an unforgivable call.
Oh shut up. He traveled anyway nerd
I thought the Texas AM player stepped out of bounds with the ball but he didn't and that was why the ref blew the whistle. Should've been a Hawaii win and totally agree with previous comments, let's review it/the video and get it right.
The Texas A&M player made contact with the ref when the ref was out of bounds making him out of boumds. Dead ball. Accurate call.
This game had a lot less controversy than what appears…
The Hawaii player who picked up the loose ball (for the alleged potential game-winner) caught it and established his right foot as his pivot with his left foot off of the ground. Then he put down the left foot behind the 3-point line and followed by picking up and putting back down the right foot outside of the arc. Thus, it was an uncalled traveling violation. If you cannot see what I just described, then turn down the video playback speed to 0.25x and watch that segment of the play again!
Nothing related to traveling violation called after whistle was blown; my point was addressing the speculative “would’ve-could’ve-should’ve” alleged controversy of saying the officials ought to have allowed and counted that 3-point basket.
I just posted about this. Hadn't seen yours yet. Yes, major travel.
SoI'm good with the result.
Clearly he was in bounds
He the player or he the Ref? My understanding: The player touched the ref, who was straddling the line when the player touched the ball. That makes the ref an out of bound surface. So the player was out of bounds because he contacted the ref when he touched the ball. Which was why the ball went to Hawaii on the throw in because the last touch in bound was by the other team.
Only issue was if the ref shifted to his own right instead of backing up, that would have been a sweet play.
1) The official shouldn't be standing on the baseline on an inbounds pass.
2) He literally did not even see what happened because he was hit. Awful call regardless of what the rules are.
description doesn't do it justice
it was less than 4 seconds
Wow…the ref who wasn’t even looking blew the whistle…that’s ridiculous.
Alt title:
Hawaii robs their own player and team of one of the biggest comebacks in basketball history.
Ref gave into the pressure of the Hawaii bench screaming saying his foot was out of bounds
The thrill of victory ✌️ .. became the agony of defeat .. 😕
I would of lost my mind if I was the coach
Speaking ad a basketball ref you have to call out of bounds as soon as it happens, he called it a full second later as the player got ready to hit the game winning shot
Nothing wrong with waiting a second to make the correct call
Look at the bench, he missed the call by being hit thought that the actions leading to it meant it went out of bounds. The entire Hawaii bench was saying out of bounds
Lol well the Hawaii coaches were saying it was out so sucks for them
Then the ref walked off the court and kissed his betting slip.
Someone needs to hold the refs accountable. Would love to see a player coach or fan beat the shit out of one of them.
That airball😂
Plays like that should be able to review the replay.
911 what's your emergency. Me: a robbery was just committed . Hawaii lost the game by a b.s. call
Can we talk about the TAMU commerce kids celebrating like they didn't just have a historically awful collapse??
I hate to be that guy, but wasn’t the ball out of bounds first since the player bumped into the ref (who was out of bounds)? He probably took a while to blow the whistle because he got bumped.
Ref had that parlay
Right call, he hit the ref who was standing out of bounds, which makes the ref an extension of the sideline. Late whistle was because the ref had gotten hit in the head. Great job by the officiating crew.
Refs have way too much control over outcomes these days and need to be held accountable. They should go in front of the media after games and answer questions as players do since they're also such a big part of the game. Especially in the NFL.
That ref who blew the whistle should be suspended, even for one game. There needs to be accountability.
The call was correct. He touched the out-of-bounds official which according to the rules means the player was out of bounds
I thought it was the right call...
@@TryhardSteveYea except.. the official wasn't out of bounds.... his foot and half his leg was in bounds and interfered with the game. Then he blindly blew the whistle without even looking at the play.
The official blew the whistle. The rules say when the whistle is blown, play is stopped. But as the replays show, that official clearly had no business blowing that whistle. The ball never went out of bounds, the official who blew the whistle had his back turned to the play and didn't even see it. As a result, Hawaii was robbed.
The Hawaii player took at least 3 steps before shooting the ball, so the shot shouldn't have counted either way. The seemingly incorrect out-of-bounds call actually benefitted Hawaii by giving them more time and a better chance to score as opposed to the travelling violation. Too bad they came up short because everyone loves a good comeback... except the losing team.
This happens in football too, when someone fumbles the refs always blow it dead. It pisses me off so much bc over half the time it’s an actual fumble and if the defender ran it back for a TD it doesn’t count bc a brain dead ref blew his loud inhaler.
They don't always blow it dead. But they will.mpre often if it's inconclusive upon happening.
Yeah it is a shame! Damage was done already. A great play under odd circumstances! No use in going back and trying to correct it .. kind of a toss-up. Agree with the previous comment that the rule needs to be more clearly defined not just left up for interpretation on the fly. In is in and out is out , no in-betweens!- off the court/ on the court when it comes to referees being involved in the court of play , let alone obstructing the play!
Dude travelled so the whistle was right
Nice catch
I put a timer on it and if the clock hadn't stopped periodically at 00.7, he might've been too late with the shot anyway.
To me looked like the play was dead way b4 the shot-even the shooter didn't think it counted
Dude travelled to get the shot off anyways took three steps without dribbling to get behind the line
Nope. Gather step.
Not a blown call, player with ball touched ref who was out of bounds, ref part of the court, thus player out of bounds prior to shot.
The guy traveled and the clock for some reason stopped at 0.7 seconds for maybe a full second. No controversy
Refs have too much power in a game. Refs like that need to be fired
When in doubt, let ‘em play
Guy travelled on the stepback before he shot anyway, not that they would call it
Not really a controversy.......probably why Hawaii coach was chill after the game........when the player touched the ref WHO WAS OUT OF BOUNDS......BY RULE (which the announcers clearly don't know), the player is out of bounds....and that's what they called.
Hawaii should refuse to count the loss in their record book like other schools do for controversal outcomes
And accomplish what?
@@gregd6706 to be stubborn and to give prople a reason to look up why there is a discrepancy
@@briandonegan8480 Dude by the rules it was absolutely the CORRECT call.
@@gregd6706 I agree with you but that's not the point.
@@briandonegan8480 Wait what??? You agree with me that Hawaii was NOT screwed but you think they should "refuse to count the loss in their record book"??? Huh???
That official should be fired and banned. Obviously had something riding on the game.
Very unfortunate, but with the Texas player crashing into the ref it's understandable.
I was there! The refs done goofed on this one. Best sequence of entire season for Hawai'i so far.
How is it living in Hawaii?
Looking at it, u could have called a foul on Hawaii for shoving the dude near sideline. And yea he wasn’t out, but a tough call, he could see his foot on the line. Can’t really blame ref for this.
Clearly, replay review has to be part of the rules.
I wonder what the line on this game was if I was betting on this game I would be pissed if that screwed up the line
D2 school beats Hawaii? Wow
Hawaii coach should’ve got a tech though for being on the court during the inbounds play.
Should not have blown that whistle. That being said, the player who hit the three.clearly traveled to get behind the line.
I was at a local restaurant and saw the score early second half, thought oh snap, it's bad. It would be cool if they made a comeback. Left and saw the score when I got home that night, and thought mannn! If only!
Oh nooo shooter was in the air by the time the whistle came out, ouch
If the ref hadn't been standing in the way, A&M would have inbounded the ball.
Right call was made left leg was outta bound's. Right team won the game.
That’s too bad for Hawaii they did everything in their power and won that game bad call ref!
Crazy they didn’t call a timeout to draw up an inbound play
they started the clock late on the 3 pointer here. 0:22
They definitely pumped the crowd noise into there , like 25 people in there stands
Fasho lol
That official deserves to be fired, humiliated, publicly shamed, ok maybe that’s too far but he needs to be fired for sure
If it makes the Hawaii fans feel better, that was an obvious travel on the game winner that was whistled dead.
The ref wasn’t looking at the play.
For fuck’s sake.
Ummmmmm that basket needs to count......there's absolutely no reason it didn't. What utter BS
He was in a horrible position and then called it out of bounds while not even looking at the play
If a player or ball contacts an out-of-bounds official, then the player or ball is out of bounds by default.
@@TryhardSteve So if a Ref has one foot in bounds and one out of bounds, he is 'out of bounds'? want to make sure, I do not know the rules, though it would make sense.
That Commerce guy is an idiot. Under no circumstances should he have saved that there. Throw it down the court towards your own basket. They didn't deserve to win that one.
I made a live bet on the under 105.5 for this game, best believe I'm buying those refs dinner
Lmao at that final shot attempt. Wtf was that?