Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Is There Scientific Proof Of Noah's Ark Ever Existing? | Myth Hunters
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
- Three American Christians, including Apollo 15 astronaut Colonel James Irwin, undertook dangerous expeditions to Mount Ararat, driven by a belief that finding Noah's Ark would prove biblical events true. Irwin's moon mission profoundly impacted his faith, leading him to dedicate his life to promoting the Bible and embarking on a quest to find the Ark, although his expeditions ultimately yielded no tangible evidence.
Discover the past on History Hit with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly presented by world renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'TIMELINE' 👉 access.history...
You can find more from us on:
/ timelinewh
/ timelineworldhistory
/ timelinewh
This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
no.
just saved you 55 minutes of utter BS ⛵️
Wasn't going to watch it. I am an Irving Finkel fan
Just in the nick of time. I felt my brain shrinking.
Doin gods work down here 🤣🤣🤣
But really, the second my brain started to process "man who has been to space and participated in an Apollo lunar mission not only believes in the bible, but truly believed that every event in it took place, up to, and including Noah's Ark"
I was waiting for the ancient aliens guy to pop up. I'm out.
Thank you!
Not all heroes wear capes. Thank you.
Noah, the only man to use iron 6000 years before the Iron Age.
He thought ahead 😉
Well not exactly 6000 if the Bible dates Noah to about 4500 years ago, and the Iron Age is estimated to have begun 3200 years ago.
this video shows that flaw and accepts it.
How can people who are creationists believe in the "Iron Age"? That makes no sense to me at all. The Iron Age is part of the evolution of man.
@@robynw6307 Creationists aren't big on logic. Or evidence. Or anything remotely resembling science.
Fun fact: The estimated time period for Noah's Ark was 5,000 BCE.... The Bronze age was around 1200 -600 BCE. And the Iron age started around 600 BCE.
There was no way that Noah would have used iron fittings on his Ark.
True Fact: Noah lived in the time of the watchers and their children. Who taught man metal workings.
@@zachwells8994 They didn't exist and they certainly didn't teach them to smelt or work iron
@@gryph01 yeah i don’t argue about whats true.
@@zachwells8994 But you do spout BS like it's going out of style
@@ecocodex4431 Jesus Christ gives eternal life. What’s inside of you?
If the timeline is correct Noah lived in the late palaeolithic era. The biggest oceangoing vessels that were made with stone age tools were the Polynesian catamarans.
They were more advanced than stone age, you are looking at the wrong way
Here to read comments
The flood story in the Bible could be the adapted version (with God) of the flood story of the Sumerian story related to the end of the last ice age when the Gulf of Persia was flooded.
The story of flooding in Southeast Asia could also relate to the flood of the Sundaland during the end of the last ice age also.
The god damned story says the whole panet was 3-5 miles deep in water.. THERE ISNT ANY WHERE NEAR THAT MUCH WATER..
There were many floods throughout history we are meant to be under one now and going into an ice age but human activity has prevented it. Like civilizations that vanished through tsunamis and weather incidents man has intervened
@@gibbo822 It says 5 miles deep. thats 250x more water than has ever existed on earth including all the ice and underground water...
@@shambleslongplay3566
Was you there? We rely on experts....
Memba that thing that riddled the world and risked to wipe out man kind??? Meeeeemba? Flu was more deadly and guess what?? Less deaths
Noah's daughter Joan of Ark just swam alongside the boat.
You just cracked me up😂
Best comment. 😂
Totally logical. 👍🏼
They forgot to let the mosquitos drown too
I'm sure they're somehow important for the environment, but I really wish God had planned that part just a little differently.
Creationist: The World began in 4000Bc, your science is just a theory.
Also Creationist: Please use your science to validate my beliefs.
@@dcjway indeed, but with greater evidence
@@dcjway Theory with a whole lot of actual evidence of it.
@@rempseaheinamies9414 A theory has to fit certain criteria to be classed a real theory, otherwise, its not theory. Some people like to distinguish between a scientific theory and a religious theory like they are 2 version of a theory. This mostly false. The subject matter of a theory is irrelevant, it is the theory that is relevant in all discussions, the data presented, the explanations presented, the predictions and projections a theory must make, also must be falsifiable. Basically, a theory is a real theory if it has great explanatory power, doesn't matter if its scientific, religious, philosophical or otherwise.
@@cameronhesketh6814 nope that is complete nonsense... because having a religious theory already puts your argument outside the realms of provability.... so it's completely different to a scientific theory... for example the theory of gravity, you don't disagree with that do you?
"theory" is not the same word in "the theory of relativity", as when you say "in theory" like a verbal caveat implying you think it should work but are not certainv"well in theory if i cut this wire we will be okay!"... you might be confused over what theory means in a scientific context, maybe thinking of what is more likely a "hypothesis", it's a proposed explanation it should have good evidence and reasoning behind it though
theory is a missunderstood word
@@cameronhesketh6814 In science, to be classified as a hypothesis, it must be falsifiable. To be a theory, it must be a hypothesis that is backed up by a preponderance of evidence.
The word "theory" as used in the vernacular has no more veracity than just a wild guess.
It's a pity Shem couldn't hang on to the unicorns when they were loading up the Ark 😔
Its recorded unicorns existed in china and older literature. Anything extraordinary is commonly known to be hunted as sport or for self preservation.
@@zachwells8994 As were fire breathing dragons.
I have a problem figuring out who carried all the viruses and STDs
@@MasterCedar Viruses and stds. Well we can observe lives of sinful living, because of sin like continued drunkeness people develop conditions in their body. Diseases, sicknesses, weakness, fatigue, death. But we also are dealing with a gov thag creates viruses, we also have to be concerned with God who may strike an individual with a plague out of judgement because of ones actions or even a whole society. Only the righteous obtain everlasting life do you know and follow Jesus Christ?
Good thing they got Bigfoot
One of the greatest fallacies ever told...
Yet atleast one civilization on every continent has a story of a great flood.
@@chrisdavenport3621 Yes but not about the Noah's arch
@@chrisdavenport3621 So what? Why do other flood stories vary so greatly from the Genesis account? Flood myths are fairly common worldwide (though sparse in more arid locales), and if they came from a common source, we should expect similarities in most of them. Instead, the myths show great diversity. For example, people survive on high land or trees in the myths about as often as on boats or rafts, and no other flood myth includes a covenant not to destroy all life again.
@@plainsman just like every civilization that didn’t have their history written down, it was passed down from generations. No story is going to capture 💯 of the truth when maybe 10 people had told the story by time genesis was written. Anybody who says it didn’t happen cause it’s not National Geographic type accurate, needs to find a better argument slow enough for you to make some LOGICAL sense.
@@Mithra53 I don’t think I believe the ark story. My opinion is everyone knew there had been a flood but questioned how anything survived and a ‘saga’ like tale became factual to them after years of history passed down.
To believe something is true without evidence is irrational
Like 99% of science
@@tribe3828 your reply is irrational. You are definitely uneducated. Nothing exists without science. Just because science can’t explain nature doesn’t make all theories nit beliefs. Without science you would still be living in the Stone Age.
@@tribe3828 maybe you should go back 500 years and live like the native Americans did with only Stone Age technology. Because science is just a belief not technology. The truth is native Americans were the last people on the planet to live 10.000 years longer in the stone age than everyone else.
@@tribe3828 Says someone too science illiterate to actually read peer reviewed published research papers for comprehension.
@@tribe3828Remember that number if you find yourself on an operating table one day. Science is about truth and facts following the Scientific Method. Check it out one day. It may help you to understand how ridiculous response really is.
There is one single, fundamental point that makes every search pointless.... the Bible does NOT say that the ark came to rest on Mount Ararat. It says it came to rest in the MountainS of Ararat. Gen 8:4.... every time anyone returnes to Mount Ararat, they are colmpletely wasting their time just because they CANNOT READ.
ship length 6 km width 2 km rivet-like nail 15 tons 42,94302 47,47184
What makes any search pointless is the fact that the whole ark story is a fairy tale. The ark never existed and a world wide flood never happened.
@@Mutrino it's like you are saying the Atlantis city that disappeared into the ocean according to Plato is a fairy tale also?
The bible also say the whole panet was 5 miles deep in water because its absolute bs.
Hi, the Bible says *_on the mountains of Ararat_* in plural, this doesn't mean that it landed for sure on this mountain, *_Mount Ararat,_* the fact is that many geologists agree that this mountain was apparently never under water, but, there's still a possibility of *_Noah's Ark_* has landed in a different place, *_Iran._* Many people might think that the *_boundaries of Urartu (Ararat),_* the region where the Bible says *_Noah's Ark_* landed, it just reached *_Mount Ararat, Mount Judi, and the mountains in Eastern Turkey and Armenia,_* but, that's not true, there were times when *_Urartu_* expanded due to the conquests of its rulers, so, there's a few ignored places where *_Noah's Ark_* might have landed.
When something is impossible it's called a myth
Stop the music it’s distracting
One of the greatest Myths ever told.
Cinderella, now there is a story you can believe in.
But even the layman has to admit the global flood myth being found in ancient cultures across the world is a bit uncanny in its own right.
@@finalsecretofchrono1339, you do realise that they all have their origins in different time periods and the storiiiiies are different except for the flood part, these storiiiiies are also passed down over the centuries, embellished, exaggerated, plagiarised, changed...........and the "Worldwide" flood was nothing more than them 'thinking' that the whole world was under water because it stretched for as far as the eye could see and it was only 'their world' that was under water, they are storiiiiies, nothing more.
You can 'believe' whatever you wish, give Cinderella a try, that's a good story;......... give me evidence, logic and sanity any day.
It's not a myth if people from around the world all have a story about it. Face it with an open mind and don't look down at the ancestors, they're alot smarter than you give them credit.
We know where Mr. Irwin is at now, we can grieve his memory but be happy that he is with Jesus now. ❤
Oh, grow UP.
Ansolutely not. I oaised before it started to save you time. Watch some comedy
This is comedy
@@ML-dz5ix I was also going to say this is comedy.
Searching for the arks is no different than searching for Bigfoot, Loch Ness Monster, Atlantis etc. Which is a complete waste of one's life.
Bigfoot and Atlantis are far more believable than magic god ship that housed two of each species. By the way, just two animals can't produce lineage anymore so that too proves that this story is bs.
Well not quite, at least we know there is a Loch Ness😉
it depends if you have evidence and a real chance of finding it, religious people don't like evidence they like following their heart strings.... if a real piece of evidence existed, it would be worth it for archaeology... being the discoverer of something like that would make someone a famous archaeologist
Researching history is great if you have funding, but either you find it or you hit a dead end.
yesterday I just watched nat geo's Lochness episode. and the doc is a big disappointment
I guess if you believe in Noah’s Ark you’d fall for anything. All aboard the HMS Ponzi.
No. Save you an hour
😂😂
Oh, Behave!
We very well may live in a simulation. There seems to be many things we can not see. We don't even know if Math is real or man made. Keep an open mind, there were floods everywhere on earth it seems.
Wrong. Neither believers nor disbelievers can say for sure either way. It MIGHT be there - SOMEWHERE, AND it might NOT be there.
However, if all you are saying is that they do NOT have scientific proof, then you are correct. And that is also the conclusion of this film.
The answer to the question within the title of this documentary is... it depends. It depends on if you mean "do they CURRENTLY have proof, the answer IS no. But, the question remains - "IS there scientific proof of the ark?", there MIGHT be proof out there somewhere but we just haven't found it YET. Conversely, there might NOT be any proof out there because there is no ark there, or there is no ark anywhere because it's been destroyed, or it just never existed. It's not just a simple question. The different possible meanings in the question must be defined.
So No then? 🤡🤡🤡🤡
TLDR: No.
correct
TLDW*
If some wood or “timbers” were found on any mountain. That doesn’t mean there’s any arc. The irrational nature of this video is astounding.
Why dont you look up the timbers found. Shape of a boat with metal way up a mountain and pushed down in slides over time.
Not only a shape of a boat but the exact size as described
@@truesoulghost2777 let’s pretend it is a boat. How does that equate to the ark? Just because Egypt exists doesn’t mean the Bible is fact. Unfortunately for you the story about an ark has been debunked in several ways. The problem is that you are trying too make facts out of fiction. You have faith and belief in a fictional book of books.
@@truesoulghost2777Why would an ancient boat have anything metal?
One day you'll know the truth
@@Jerrynotjefff you don’t think it’s weird telling strangers about themselves? Please show evidence that any hod exists. You can’t because your god isn’t real. That’s the truth.
Five minutes into it and I had to stop watching. This is religious mythology!
🤣
How did the penguins get back to Antarctica after the flood? This is a fairy tale.
They road on the backs of big fish. (-:
Well according to Answers in Genesis the roos got to Oz by being blasted there by a volcanic eruption and there are penguins in Oz so perhaps they hitched a ride with the roos and some carried on to Antarctica.
Antartica didn't exist before the flood so.....
@@nathangent6921 That is a real help in aging the flood, if there was no Antarctica before the flood then the flood must have happened well over 200,000,000 years ago. Even you must admit that is a little before Noah's time.
@@MasterCedar Christians believe Noah existed about 2000 years before the creation and earth at that time had only one land mass which evolutionists call Pangea.
If you believe 2 termites were brought on a wooden boat & housed in wooden quarters, you are crazy!
A lot of scientist don't beleive in The Bible. NKJV Bible. Genesis 4:22
[22]And as for Zillah, she also bore Tubal-Cain, an instructor of every craftsman in bronze and iron. And the sister of Tubal-Cain was Naamah. This was before the great flood.
Both the old and new testaments of the babble are nothing but myths and legends designed to teach moral lessons to ancient people. The same is true of the Greek myths.
My question that boggles my mind is how was Noah able to wrangle animals like bison, bears, yak, lions, tigers, etc. from their home ranges to the Babylonian plains. It's too easy just to say it's magic.
ship length 6 km width 2 km rivet-like nail 15 tons 42,94302 47,47184
Congratulations and who are u,have u been maybe there? Don't judge if u think it's just a myth keep for urself. Nobody is interested what u think about truth
If you believe that two penguins walked from Antarctica to the Middle East to get on a boat built by a 600 year old man you should not be allowed out in public unsupervised
Penguin waddle or flap can't walk
Why would penguins need to get on an ark when they were on ice caps? Would there be fish on board? No. They would only need to bring on board animals that couldn't survive a flood. It's amazing the extents someone will go to in order to attack others' beliefs to make themselves feel superior.
@@timothydunn438
Kangaroos hopped from Australia then, did they?
@@londonlion5179 If you don't know that thousands of years ago there was no Australian continent, you should not be allowed out in public unsupervised.
I noticed that many have not heard of Peleg, who he was and what happened in those days. And to all educated ignorami concerning time, go find out why the speed of light has been slowing down since the beginning of Time and what that means for its measurement, what is C14 and why " million of years" is a joke.
Penguins weren't on the Ark since they are excellent swimmers and can stay in the open ocean for months.
Aboriginals never had a civilization, barely counted digits and yet they know what thousands of years mean 😱.
In all this is missed the most important part, that the reason for the Flood was the fallen ones messing with creation's DNA. If God protected life from the wicked back then by saving only those on the Ark, I'm sure He won't let TPTB to succeed in changing the code of life into an abomination at their second try either. This time they are promised fire.
@@G.Larus42
The Bible says that the world is 6000 years old. Are you seriously suggesting that Australia is less than 6000 years old? Make sure that you call nurse before going out to the shops
There’s a simple logical answer to the existence of the arc. If there was evidence of it being true then there wouldn’t be a question whether it is or not. Obviously the story has been debunked for many reasons.
No, if the humanistic nature of sin wasn't real, there would be no issue to question God’s truth. Despite all the evidence, sinful humans want to create their own beliefs that defy God, this is why everyone needs Jesus.
Well, there is plenty of evidence, but people don't believe it because they are biased and follow their presuppositions based on a sinful mindset.
@@LueRue06 do you understand what faith is? Maybe ask yourself why people believe a fictional book of books is fact and then tell who’s biased. The book is the claim so it’s illogical to use the claim as evidence. Meaning you can’t say atheists are sinners because sinning is a claim in the Bible. If sinning is real then where’s the evidence of it? Stop putting your fake beliefs on others.
@@LueRue06sinning is a claim of a fictional book it’s not humanistic. Until someone can prove that any god is real and exists then you’re just irrational. Somehow you think that everyone should be irrational like you. You are the problem with this world. Stop believing in things there’s no evidence that it’s real it just makes you irrational.
@@bigskunk801 Faith is putting your trust in someone despite the unknowns. Realize that EVERYONE has a bias, it would not be easy to change the way one sees something if they already have a set belief. The Bible carries evidence that corresponds with physical evidence as well as historical events that align with the times, locations, and such, but it starts with faith in God and in Jesus (our savior). Anyway, sin is a global humanist characteristic that WE ALL share, I'm not saying that only atheists are sinners, we all are. Sin is the wrongful act against moral and divine law, the Old Testament of scripture gives the foundation of what this means to sin against God, but ultimately, we all sin, we all disobey God, sin is a common trait we all share, its only natural to rebel. However, not believing in God, Jesus, and the Gospel, is what puts people at risk for eternal separation from God. Sin is doing what you know is wrong, but you do it willingly. Sin is going against morality and actively pursuing evil, whether it is something as small as lying, or something much larger. Sin is not a claim, it's a fact.
At least one civilization on every continent has a story about a great flood. People say there’s no science to prove it well how does every continent have people who talk about it?
Because bodies of water are generally where civilizations come about. Bodies of water flood. Floods can be devastating to that population. Therefore, flood stories.
There's scientific proof of a flood as terrible as Noah's and many old legends from every corner of the world about it with similar story lines 🥰
Of course it's real, like Hogwarts.
I remember getting the call to fix the luner rover, it was out in the middle of the desert and we worked all night. The only problem was we left a JEEP out there and someone took a picture.
How'd you get there, Willie Wonka's great glass elevator turned outer space vehicle?
And to think that they defiled that nice old desert just to make a fraudulent film about 'Noah'.
Is there scientific proof that the planet flooded 3 miles deep in water and then the water just vanished??
None. There IS abundant evidence that there was never a global flood.
They're still looking for the drain plug
There has never been anywhere near enough water on the planet to create such a preposterous idea.
And 12 years later, they still haven't found it.
Ive justbhave a joint. This is going to be hikarious.
Enjoy, friend.
I can tell by the way u are typing. Enjoy the vid lol.
😂
I'm about to have one too!! Need a laugh this morning 😂😂😂
Wasted weed my friend.
In studying Theological Bible Doctrine, it is not necessary for science to provide proof. It is regrettable that Timeline endorses this notion. Proving the existence of God is straightforward. Anti-Semitism does exist. The Nazis were completely defeated because of it. It is preferable to focus on science, history, and the like, rather than mocking spiritual life. Science is a human creation. The divine should be left to God. Wishing you a pleasant day.
¨Proving the existence of God is straightforward¨
Really? Wonder why no one has been able to do it to date... Also no one has really ever been able to even define what ¨God¨is...
@@thomasxxxxxx2345 Really?! God, creator of the heavens and earth, who created everything in six literal days, is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and loving. Furthermore, scripture aligns with Historical accounts like the Flood with scientific evidence-the rapid burial of fossils.
@@LueRue06 Where do you wanna start ? Loving ? Explain children who die of horrible diseases (not to mention assorted genocides conducted by God himself). Omnipotent ? Why did it take him almost a week to create "heavens and earth"? Omnipresent ? Where is he then and why can't he be detected?
Scripture does not align with much.. There is NO historical account of a global worldwide flood, though of course there are plenty of local floods that happen all the time
And I suppose coincidentally by a stroke of luck, this God happens to be from your particular religion, while the God(s) of all other religions are non existent ?
@@LueRue06 This is an absurdly rigid viewpoint that few of the early church fathers would have agreed with. For instance, since the time of the early church, many theologians have recognized that Genesis 1-3 presents a largely figurative depiction of creation. Augustine and Origen both understood, for instance, that the Bible did not describe literal twenty-four hour days. As Origen put it, “who would be so foolish as to believe that the days of creation are literal days when there is not even sun, moon, and stars until the fourth day”. The rest of your gibberish makes it clear how little you know about scientific reality as well.
I saw a 1972 doc on this subject; it was nonsense and it remains nonsense
The lunar rover didnt really have any issues on the moon like this video seems to imply. It had a bent steering rod, and Huston came up with a fix, and the fix was applied and it worked. No god or magic involved, just teamwork and cool headed astronauts.
thank god that he gifted them with the knowledge to fix it
Now we all know that the moon stuff is all Hollywood
BS. We all know it was all filmed here on earth. Things like a broken rover were invented for dramatic purposes. There is no need to lie anymore. We know it was filmed in a studio and the astronauts were all puppets. Heck Kennedy was a puppet too and so am I.
@@dollywilson1005 The nice thing about conspiracy theories is that there are so many to choose from. And that you don't need a single fact to start them.
@@dollywilson1005 Science literacy is clearly not one of your strong points.
Um no its hilarious it's even considered to be true. It's way out there as the wooden boat is actually smaller than the Titanic and all the animals would never fit on today's largest ship
Again, 2 of each kind of animal, cat: one kind, dog: one kind…they reproduced from there. That means that maybe a couple of Smilodons came off the ark and through God, tigers, caracals, panthers, and house cats were created through adaptation to the new environment.
We very well may be living in a simulation. There seems to be many things we can not see directly without advanced technology. We are always 80 milliseconds in the past. Math may only be man made. Denying the mystery of reality is easy but a shame. Keep an open mind. Be positive.
Besides, I use these to go to sleep so how dare someone tell me it is a waste, I despise closed mindedness and people shuting others down. Secular Athism has left the world depressed and anxious.
The thing is, Noah and his people lived before the Iron Age. The professor even mentioned in the video. The arc was made of wood, and we don't know what kind of woods they used to built it. The great flood happened more than 4,300 years ago according to biblical dates and bible scholars. Do you think the woods would last that long 4 millennia? This means that the arc decayed already and vanished into oblivion with no traces on it. The arc was not made of concrete, granite, marble, and other stones like the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt which lasted forever. But Noah's Ark was made of wood, it is gone already, disappeared. How could you find that boat made of wood that decomposed and decayed already unless those people preserved it like the mummification thing?
Well, many of us are still hoping and "wishing" that Noah's Ark could be found in its resting place.
It certainly was easier to walk on the moon... because math and science was involved to get there instead of exclusively relying on fables and faith. Makes perfect sense.
Yes, God uses mankind to do great things, like traveling to the moon, but it is only through faith that we can be Saved through Christ Jesus. And yes, there is lots of evidence supporting the Great Flood.
Religion - the greatest hoax ever perpetrated against mankind.
Some things are meant to be on faith and faith alone......
THAT is Self-Delusion. As Mark Twain so sagely pointed out, 'Faith is believing what you know ain't so'.
The true finder of the Noah's Ark and not only that was Ron Wyatt. Do your homework.
Famous kook, lol.
10:38 "....And so they started practising on the hills near their home in Colorado Springs....'
"Nope. No Noah's Ark here, either. This is good practice for not finding it when we go to Turkey."
I'll save you the hour of video. The answer is NO.
What did the lions eat...?
The Unicorns.
Noah's ark did not land on Mount Ararat. It's not what it says in the Bible it landed in the region of the mountains of Ararat.
This documentary is a thriller suspense drama. No answers to the question asked on the video's title. Sometimes i think that American or European documentary are influenced by the indian daily soaps. I wasted 50 minutes of my life watching something that doesn't have any conclusion
Only Americans would think this was true...
I'm Canadian and iknow it is true everything in the word of God 😊😊😊😊
Really? You're joking right?
@inasimard740 Huuuuh haaaaa !!
The internet loves a good troll...NOT.
Only anti-God thinks it's false...
I loved the story of Noah's ark when i was a kid, souly because of the animals.
But when i became a free thinking adult, this story is the reason i became an atheist eventually.
It makes no geographical sense.
Creationists are the best thing that ever happed to Atheism.
😂 you just bought into man made lies
If you look into it though, it makes all the sense in the world. Fossils were thrown about during the flood along with the sediments, and the flood, along with the earthquakes, hurricanes, and volcanic eruptions, it completely reshaped the earth. Everything died that was not on the ark and after the flood, the earth changed completely. God sent two of each animal kind onto the ark, so they would all fit there, and from the cat kind chosen, we now have tigers and lions, etc…one kind…
That's also how we get seasons, the result of the flood: winter and rain…
@@LueRue06 It makes no sense at all. Speaking of sediments, why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of unique sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, and a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, yet no such evidence exists.
The dimensions of the Ark are a geometrical figure onto which other numbers in the story can be placed to create a map of a voyage ... from Heliopolis to Patmos. This probably relates to a movement of people from Egypt to Greece during the chaos at the end of the Egyptian Old Kingdom (c. 2150 BC). Ararat can be seen as the farthest movement of these people following a sea route. From there they could have traveled across to Northern Mesopotamia ... then, as Abraham, back to Egypt. The original Exodus followed a roundabout route.
The Old Testament ... the Pentateuch ... is the work of the Jews who returned from their Babylonian captivity in the 6th century BC (some Jews, the peasantry, weren't taken into captivity) who, as it says in Kings, declared that it had been found buried in the Temple at Jerusalem, having been put there by Moses hundreds of years earlier. If there was a Moses could he have been someone from the Egyptian Old KIngdom ... prior to 2150 BC?
Drivel... don't waste any time here, "we don't care what mountain it's found on, we just want it found" classic drivel
It's such a stupid question I unsubbed
Those video should only be 30 seconds:
No, there isnt.
Here we go again, the Earth is not billions of years old. You take the Genesis account literally!!!!
The "door" in the side of the ark (womb) is the Yoni/Delta/Female doorway to heaven.
This doco would have more credibility if there was less invoking of religious faith and more reliance on balance of rationale and evidence.
No, plus chity production.
How many times have we heard someone has found it
It's like apocalyptic predictions. The nice thing about them is that there are so many to choose from -- and they're all wrong.
4:28 Where in the Bible is the age of the earth mentioned?
If you do not believe what the Bible (word of God) says, then you are mocking God by these things you are saying.
The bible is true and people will do anything to discredit it and deny it.
Not really, just work out the basic numbers for an Ark to house all those animals and food and you will come to the conclusion that it’s BS too.
Bible claims that there was water and plant life on Earth before the sun was created. Let that sink in.
@@rempseaheinamies9414
The Bible also claims that ' in the beginning there was light' 4 days before it claims that the stars and planets were created. Holy flood lights?
@@londonlion5179 Must be the ancient ones' construction folks arriving to create the universe.
@@londonlion5179 Ancient ones' constructors arriving to create the universe.
It would mean all the animals and humans are extremely inbred, something that can be quickly shown not to be the case......apart from some cut off, backwoods type places where everyone is related !
I was just thinking that. It would mean every living creature is inbred.
Noah brought his wife. And his sons and daughters brought their husbands and wives. No inbreeding.
No inbreeding. See another comment. Plus, there are so many other races around with hundreds of thousands of years that have passed since; please do not submit anymore fallacies.
Quick answer to title question. No.
I wouldn’t expect to find anything left of it either. We can safely conclude the Noah story wasn’t in the last 2000 years. I would think that boat would get salvaged for lumber to build a house wherever the new beach was. It certainly wouldn’t be on a mountain, I don’t climb if I can avoid it.
I can’t believe in 2024 we need a documentary that discusses whether a boat that fit two of every animal on earth is legit
and yet we were glued and binged
If there is such a thing as the ark, it will never be found. If you find it that proves God exists, and removes the need for faith which is the central tenet of the Abrahamic religions.
i wonder if their are pairs of dinosaurs in noahs ark and how they fit it
Easy.Just take the small juveniles and eggs.Heaps of room now.
@@nathangent6921 For millions of species. Mixed with the millions of species that currently exist. Would take a helluva big ark 😉
@@nathangent6921 Still a good trick since dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid strike 65 million years ago.
@@paulford9120 Again, not species, two of each kind, plenty of room now.
@@plainsman No evidence for any of that, but the flood, volcanic activity, earthquakes, etc…caused the rapid burial of the animals (and dinosaurs) outside of the ark. Rocks completely changed as the earth was wiped clean, this is why strata layers are found all throughout the earth, and fossils of the same species.
I like that this series does take the myths seriously but they use it more to explain the mindset of the people who believe in it and what it tells us about history more than the usual, "Could it be real?" and then basically leaving us with no better information.
Just because many truths can be revealed by the lies that a liar tells - doesn’t make those lies truths
@@L8rCloud Didn't say it did but thanks for weighing in with your philosophical claptrap, lol.
This is actually a dumber question than you think if you actually know anything about Christianity and correct hermeneutics 🤦🏿♂️
thanks for teaching me a new word
@@Charlie-phlezk it’s a super important one if you want to know why 99.9% of common critiques of Christianity are low tier Reddit level idiocy
Its ashame to see so many people on here that dont believe in God.
Which out of the thousands of gods do you refer to?
No because the koala only eats eucalyptus plants that only exist in Australia then the platypus is a mammal that lays eggs the fact you expect me to believe they traversed all the way from some Arab country to Australia is farcical
Crazy that so few people are motivated to find evidence for their fairytale
NO ARK…😊
We should remember the lessons of the Ark
I thought Ron Wyatt discovered the supposed "Noah's Ark in Turkey. If you are questioning that, then you feel the same way I do. In the Bible, God tells Noah how to build it in an extremely specific way. There was a height, width and length. Nowhere does God tell Noah to curve the bow or the stern. Therefore, the supposed ark that Mr. Wyatt found could not be Noah's Ark as it has a curved bow and stern.
What if some one will say that the Ark were and is not physically, as the Rain water weren't and is not Physical water...
No.
I like how all the comments about it being wrong and a waste of time to watch are literally posted within ten minutes of it being posted. Meaning that they never watched it. My guess is the bots are out in force on this video, and that the comments aren’t even real people.
My guess is that they only had to read the title of the video to realise that it was going to be a load of nonsense
@@londonlion5179 that’s crazy to say about something you’ve never watched obviously know nothing about.
@@jeremiahmartin9151
Nothing wrong with drawing your own conclusions from the title alone. Would you give an hour of your time to a video titled ' the moon is made of cheese'
I'm no explorer by any stretch and my simple faith tells me it is there. That's enough for me. I'm not certain why some of these Christians can't let it go at that and just have faith that it is there. Maybe they just like exploring is my only guess.
No.
The only evidence we have is that the story of Noah was most likely plagiarized from ancient Sumeria and the Epic of Gilgamesh where the story is sometning like 85% identical even though Gilgamesh's epic is 3 thousand years older. We can find stories of localized flooding in every culture. Apologists scream, "See, I told you so," but not so fast. You missed the part about "localized" flooding. There has never been a shred of evidence for a global flood. We still see localized flooding even today that kills thousands. It's a powerful force and easy to see why it has been immortalized in literature. Also, why it was attributed to Gods being upset.
If you believe this story is true without my having to mention a 600 year old man or lions, tigers, and bears walking peacfully onto a boat beside prey. Or that wooden boat surviving a major storm for 40 days on an open ocean. Or the animals we find today only on their continent without a single bone of theirs found on their journey to said continent. You shouldn't be allowed to vote.
It's funny how desperate Creationists are to have scientists verify their mythological beliefs. They don't really trust in faith. They want real answers.
A lot of them didn't quite get the concept behind the Doubting Thomas story.
@@paulford9120 Even so Jesus himself treated skepticism, even if it was very effective, as lesser than blind faith. Why? Who knows. Jesus himself was doing a tour among his followers to show them he was the real deal. He shouldn't have a reason to be negative about Thomas seeking the evidence Jesus was offering to everyone else.
You do understand most sre christians right or do you live under a rock
IN THE BEGINNING....MAN CREATED GOD!!!!😂😂😂😂
Is the Bible literally true? Not a chance. Is it allegory? Very possibly. Is it fantasy fiction? Also very possible.
They should use lidar mapping to find the ark
A whole documentary with no conclusion. As I understand it Ararat is a misreading of the text anyway, so even if it were true (spoiler alert: it's an old mesopotamian myth, so no) they're looking in the wrong place.
indeed.
Is there scientific proof that human life came from Nothing ??? Nope
Is there scientific proof that human life came from God??? Nope
@@donaldwesterhazy9333 “Evolutionary theory” is called a theory for a reason. Its make believe
You are correct. Life didn't come from nothing. No scientist has ever said that. The only ones saying that are YEC's and Kent Hovind
@@FelipeValdez-og2tgIn the scientific definition, a theory is the highest form of evidence.
A theory is that there is sufficient evidence to give us confidence that the hypothesis was correct.
In science, there is no proof. Proof is regulated to mathematics.
@@gryph01 same science that thought blacks were less than human in the early 1900’s ? who funded the research on evolution ? people with a bias
Our beliefs inform our actions, and our actions have consequences. Religion clouds the mind, it’s a recipe to grossly misjudge and mislead, and compels people to undertake the most absurd of acts, even at their own expense. They see what they want to see, yet they are completely blind to evidence.
Noah is 600 years old. He's a cartographer, and you say people living back then didn't have knowledge of iron. Now that's the wrong thought process
So presumable complete fantasy is the right thought process. OK, got it (cough).
Bwahahahahahahahahajajajajajajajhahahahaahahahahaha !!!!
TLDW: No! There is _0_ evidence that ANY magic sky wizard told a man to build a giant boat and fill it with animals because the magic sky wizard was gonna flood the entire planet.
This is a waste of research money and resources!
i knew a man who went up there driven by the same nonsence,he was never seen again,they found part of his tent.
Lol
The Bible is Philosophical Fiction!
It's a shame that you had to mention the moon landing it never happened.
The flood myth is a nice story. But to take it too seriously is just inane.
Well, luckily it is not a myth, but Jesus will come back, then you will wish you read the Bible and come to know Christ.
@@LueRue06 The flood myth was inherited from the Sumerians long before the Bible was written. Please do some extra studying on the matter.
@@LueRue06 There is copious evidence that there was never a global flood. Any other conclusion is just wishful thinking and self-delusion.
Carbon date is not accurate.