How a geothermal breakthrough could transform our energy grid

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024

Комментарии • 41

  • @Grist
    @Grist  2 года назад +1

    This was the last video in our new series called Proof of Concept. You can watch the all the episodes here: ruclips.net/p/PL8CdHFjBJ1d_eYffafogiy-YZehjq6xcs
    Thanks for tuning in! 📹🔬🙏 We're planning to bring this series back next year. We're starting the research process, so let us know what you're curious about and subscribe to our channel for a new video every month: ruclips.net/user/gristtv

  • @ladyselenafelicitywhite1596
    @ladyselenafelicitywhite1596 2 года назад +9

    I hope this takes off 🙋🏼‍♀️ what remarkable technology.

  • @THEScottCampbell
    @THEScottCampbell Год назад +1

    It's not "renewable"; it's perpetual and virtually eternal. The gyrotron tube allows for drilling three to six miles far cheaper and easier than ever before.

  • @Neuralatrophy
    @Neuralatrophy 2 года назад +3

    Combine it with heat pumps to recycle waste heat and you can raise the efficiency even more.

  • @thesilentone4024
    @thesilentone4024 2 года назад +6

    Ya I cant figure out why people can't get into this.
    I always hear its to deep theres no volcanos nere.
    Like come on people we drill for oil down to 4 miles sometimes drilling is way more affordable then ever before.
    Them na it will cost to much whats the point.
    🤦 why is it easier to drive a nail in a bord with your head then to convince these people its easy to start up and it can in fact benefit there life and potentially reduce there bills.

    • @peggysmiley1053
      @peggysmiley1053 2 года назад +1

      Just like driving 55mph results in your car emitting less pollutants, the other side of that coin is your increased mpg, which is saving you money. Maybe drivers could be coerced (fooled) if someone introduced this as the latest ‘Driving Hack’, lol

  • @PresidentialWinner
    @PresidentialWinner 2 года назад +2

    That last thing is truly pioneering. It will change the face of energy if it works.

  • @kurt2rsenjazz
    @kurt2rsenjazz 2 года назад +9

    That was very informative, Im glad this video and channel was recommended for me

    • @Grist
      @Grist  2 года назад

      Thanks, really glad you liked it

  • @Randomgen77
    @Randomgen77 2 года назад +4

    Very interesting. With climate change throwing hydro into chaos (see Glen Canyon) and battery storage technologies still in a supply conundrum, enhanced geothermal could be a strong bet to add base load stability in at least parts of the US.

  • @andjelatatarovic8309
    @andjelatatarovic8309 2 года назад +6

    Thanks for your channel! I'm excited to keep learning from it!

    • @Grist
      @Grist  2 года назад

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @michaeljames5936
    @michaeljames5936 Год назад

    Great video; made the whole geothermal-prospect thing, positively exciting.

  • @brucehescht1210
    @brucehescht1210 2 года назад +1

    Iceland has that all over

  • @alexvarghese3360
    @alexvarghese3360 Год назад

    What if there is an earthquake or some movement? Would it not destroy that source of energy underneath?

  • @Athanatoi
    @Athanatoi 2 года назад +1

    Unlimited Power!

  • @danielvonbose557
    @danielvonbose557 Год назад

    Every steam turbine run by fossil fuels could be run instead from steam from deep within the Earth! This means a geothermal well at every fossil fuels powered plant.

  • @meh23p
    @meh23p Год назад

    But what about the increased risk of earthquakes? That’s another known consequence of fracking. So how does this technology pumping water into rock compare to that?

  • @Cccoast
    @Cccoast 2 года назад

    But…. What is it’s effect on atmospheric temperature. Also, what affect does it have on local weather patterns?

    • @justinterested5819
      @justinterested5819 Год назад

      The suns sends in around 100Watt/m² in cold regions (Canada). Thats 100 000 000 000 Watt/km² (100GW). A Power Plant is nothing in comparison.
      Much more important is the (net plus) CO2 Emission and Impact on plant and wildlife.

  • @dalewolver8739
    @dalewolver8739 Год назад

    So you take heat and convert it into energy, where does the waste heat produced go? Into the atmosphere . What is causing the planet to overheat? Heat that is trapped. There are the laws of thermodynamics at play in any energy transformation process

  • @ming3.14
    @ming3.14 7 месяцев назад

    When you hear someone say: the earth is big, we are small, so we use a little bit of geothermal energy, it does not matter. Do you think it is scientific?
    When you hear someone say: geothermal energy is clean, and it is nearly unlimited, therefore renewable, do you think it is scientific or responsible? And what are the logical fallacies in this statement?

  • @awdrifter3394
    @awdrifter3394 2 года назад

    It would be funny if this tech is put into commercial use earlier than fusion reactor.

  • @agaragar21
    @agaragar21 2 месяца назад

    updates please !

  • @noodleboi6711
    @noodleboi6711 2 года назад

    So Hawaii could easily be self sustaining, this needs WAY more traction

  • @francescopaci9435
    @francescopaci9435 Год назад

    but doesn't the heat that escapes increase global warming?

  • @thewalnutwoodworker6136
    @thewalnutwoodworker6136 2 года назад

    How does this only have 5k views?

  • @lilaccilla
    @lilaccilla 2 года назад +1

    Talk to Icelanders

    • @vblaas246
      @vblaas246 Год назад +1

      Exactly. Still, the laser to melt rock is pretty cool.

  • @sunilmakaju5175
    @sunilmakaju5175 2 года назад

    I hope this tech doesn't kill earth

  • @wecare838
    @wecare838 2 года назад

    But isnt fracking alao not good for the environment?

    • @gene8172
      @gene8172 2 года назад +1

      This isn’t fracking. Sealed borehole with a closed loop heat exchanger.

  • @Andre-qo5ek
    @Andre-qo5ek 2 года назад +2

    I have wondered just how "renewable" geothermal is.
    We humans do it time and time again; we extract too much and throw off normal cycles.
    not even solar energy is "renewable" after all.
    its just a battery with 7.5 Billions years left on it.
    what do the studies say about us cooling the earth?
    "How long until the Earth’s core cools completely?
    Since bridgmanite is cooling at a rate faster than previously thought, 1.5 times higher, this gives “a new perspective on the evolution of the Earth’s dynamics,” Professor Murakami told ETH Zurich. This will have a knock-on effect for calculations of heat transfer of the stable mineral phases at the core-mantle boundary." from Why is Earth's core cooling faster according to scientists? - Greg Heilman
    we already heat up the atmosphere, now we want to cool the ground by releasing its heat??

    • @starmax1000
      @starmax1000 2 года назад +5

      Earth's core and mantle get heated up by radioactive materials and isotopes inside, but even those have an end. But I think that of geothermal ever gets exhausted, humanity will be long gone, since it might take billions of years since heat is released like that in even larger amounts all the time through vulcanism

    • @Grist
      @Grist  2 года назад +6

      According to this calculation on Wired by a physics professor, at the very low-end, the estimate is the Earth's heat will provide 17 billion years of 100% geothermal energy. This is longer than the sun will last. You can see the calculation here: www.wired.com/story/how-long-will-earths-geothermal-energy-last/

    • @Andre-qo5ek
      @Andre-qo5ek 2 года назад +2

      @@starmax1000 no doubt it will take a long time.
      but i have strong faith that profiteers and ignorance of consumption quantities will lead to another climate crisis, this time at our feet.
      200 years we messed up the climate with industry.
      i don't want to be short sighted with geothermal either. i want to keep in mind my progenitor 10,000 years down the line.
      edit:
      i guess i'll have to start thinking about my progenitors 170,000,000 years in the future (supposing a 1% energy consumption would start having negative effects on the planet. )

    • @Andre-qo5ek
      @Andre-qo5ek 2 года назад +2

      @@Grist Great response thank you!