Stockpile Stewardship: Los Alamos
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2024
- "Heritage of Science" is a short video that highlights the Stockpile Stewardship program at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Stockpile Stewardship was conceived in the early 1990s as a national science-based program that could assure the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear deterrent without the need for full-scale underground nuclear testing. This video was produced by Los Alamos National Laboratory for screening at the Lab's Bradbury Science Museum in Los Alamos, NM and is narrated by science correspondent Miles O'Brien.
- Наука
Great interviews, thank you for sharing and for what you do!
Worked at this facility for two years. I'm glad to see some of the work I contributed is seen. DARHT
Nice video
thankyou Los Alamos for MCNP6
Wonder if it would be cheaper and more effective to just replace those wepons assemblies with new built and improved components
We should be able to test random warheads over the remote ocean. I'm not convinced these still work.
Sugerencia : Deberían traducirlos al Español.Toda esta información es muy interesante para toda latinoAmérica.
The question is: Does an ENEMY have confidence that the weapons will work? Without physical demonstrations from time to time surely it becomes a bit abstract and distant - not good for maintaining deterrence; or to quote Richard Rhodes: "Mutually assured destruction to the point of personal dread."
The "enemy" can find loads of test already conducted and recorded. Test above ground is bad news for everyone.
6:31 Go Broncos!!
this guy seems happy about nukes
Wow, sure is expensive alternative to real world under ground test. i WOULD SEND A WEAPON TOWARDS THE SUN AND TEST FIRE IT AND HAVE THE INFO SENT BACK.
To be able too say to the president= to be able too input code for programming, then and now all it meant?
Trump
Black Betty ran Bhutan
On owe black Betty can't got stamp
Encryption has no mind
Braun no noun
Oh black Betty
Rambhutan
Los Alamos needs to rehire James Doyle immediately. His academic freedom was violated, as was our right to a diversity of views. Tax payers should not be forced to subsidize a monopoly of views. I have the right to hear arguments for nuclear abolition from experts.
Censorship is unamerican.
What do you expect - remember how they did Oppenheimer after he renounced the bomb?
Technetiumalchemist I have reason to believe that powerful forces exist that can censor people who don't fit the mould. It is little discussed in our "democracy."