A Mixed Equation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
  • 🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (SyberMath Shorts).
    Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡
    / @sybermath
    / @aplusbi
    ⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
    My merch → teespring.com/...
    Follow me → / sybermath
    Subscribe → www.youtube.co...
    ⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bG...
    If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
    in...
    #algebra #logarithm #exponential
    via @RUclips @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
    PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
    ▶ Trigonometry: • Trigonometry
    ▶ Algebra: • Algebra
    ▶ Complex Numbers: • Complex Numbers
    ▶ Calculus: • Calculus
    ▶ Geometry: • Geometry
    ▶ Sequences And Series: • Sequences And Series

Комментарии • 16

  • @tunneloflight
    @tunneloflight Месяц назад +8

    also x = ln(1/log(e))

    • @il_solito_anonimo9164
      @il_solito_anonimo9164 Месяц назад +2

      Well it's the same thing, because 1/log(e)->1/(In(e)/In(10))->1/(1/In(10))->In(10), so In(1/log(e))=In(In(10))

  • @SidneiMV
    @SidneiMV Месяц назад +5

    (1/logx)lnx = ln10
    eˣ= ln10
    *x = ln(ln10)*

  • @Khashayarissi-ob4yj
    @Khashayarissi-ob4yj Месяц назад

    With luck and more power to you.
    hoping for more videos

  • @Gordy-io8sb
    @Gordy-io8sb Месяц назад +1

    e^0=ln0/log0
    e^0=1/1
    e^0=1
    x=0
    I don't know, I'm bad with logarithms.
    E: I wrote this comment while running on like 4 or 5 hours of sleep -- I realize my mistake now.

    • @il_solito_anonimo9164
      @il_solito_anonimo9164 Месяц назад

      In0 and log0 are both equals to -infinity, so they don't exist in real, and complex, solutions. I think you changed the 0 and the 1, in fact log(1)=0

    • @Gordy-io8sb
      @Gordy-io8sb Месяц назад

      @@il_solito_anonimo9164 Wait, wouldn't -∞ * (-∞)^-1 just be 1?

    • @Monero_Monello
      @Monero_Monello Месяц назад

      ​@@Gordy-io8sb some infinities are bigger than others, you can't simplify them like that

    • @Gordy-io8sb
      @Gordy-io8sb Месяц назад

      @@Monero_Monello That's an elementary aspect of set theory. This is analysis. Also, you're not even using the statement correctly.

    • @Monero_Monello
      @Monero_Monello Месяц назад

      ​@@Gordy-io8sb whatever gets the point across is enough in my books

  • @Foamea45
    @Foamea45 Месяц назад

    e^x=lnx/(lnx/ln100 e^x=ln10=>x=ln(ln10)

  • @barberickarc3460
    @barberickarc3460 Месяц назад

    If you use change of base on lnx to logx/log(e) you see the x terms cancel and you have a constant on the right side, so you're fine to ln both sides and get x = -ln(log e) ≈ 0.834

  • @tejpalsingh366
    @tejpalsingh366 Месяц назад +1

    e^e^x= 10

  • @phill3986
    @phill3986 Месяц назад

    😊🎉😊👍👍👍😊🎉😊

  • @TheOldeCrowe
    @TheOldeCrowe Месяц назад

    eˣ = lnx/logx = lnx/(lnx/ln10) = ln10
    x = ln(ln10)