8 Ways Your Scientific Writing Will Annoy Reviewers--Part 1
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- There are many ways an author can annoy a reviewer of a scientific paper, but poor writing is guaranteed to elicit negative comments. In this two-part video I offer a sampling of examples of scientific writing that may irritate a reviewer and provide some guidance as to how to improve the writing. I’ve compiled these based on my own forty-year experience as a reviewer as well as what colleagues have told me bugs them. This is Part 1, which introduces the topic by providing a few examples of actual reviewer comments about poor writing. I cover four ways your scientific writing might aggravate a reviewer and what you can do to avoid it.
Share this video: • 8 Ways Your Scientific...
If you found Part 1 helpful, you might like to view "How to Annoy Reviewers with Your Scientific Writing--Part 2": • 8 Ways Your Scientific...
If you use video in your research or would like to make a video about your research, check out my other RUclips channel, The Scientist Videographer: / sciencevideography
Follow me on Twitter: @SciWri_KLMcKee
This video is four years old, yet it's extremely helpful. I'm very happy that I found your RUclips channel, and I'm grateful for the great videos that you make.
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you for these short gems. They are very useful
Glad you think so!
This is very concise and useful. Thank you very much for putting this together.
Please suggest some articles with excellent writing. I'd like to study their language to improve mine
Thank you so much for your suggestions!
Glad you like them!
Very useful. Many thanks.
Glad it was helpful!
Those quotes at the beginning made me chuckle
Those quotes are really the opposite of constructive feedback. Dont think we should allow this culture in academia...