The Simple Genius of the Interstate Highway System
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 авг 2021
- Sign up for a CuriosityStream subscription and also get a free Nebula subscription (the streaming platform built by creators) here: CuriosityStream.com/wendover
Watch a Nebula-exclusive companion video to this here: nebula.app/videos/wendover-pr...
Watch Extremities at / extremities
Buy a Wendover Productions t-shirt: standard.tv/collections/wendo...
Subscribe to Half as Interesting (The other channel from Wendover Productions): / halfasinteresting
RUclips: / wendoverproductions
Instagram: / sam.from.wendover
Twitter: / wendoverpro
Sponsorship Enquiries: wendover@standard.tv
Other emails: sam@wendover.productions
Reddit: / wendoverproductions
Writing by Sam Denby
Research by Sam Denby and Tristan Purdy
Editing by Alexander Williard
Animation by Josh Sherrington
Sound by Graham Haerther
Thumbnail by Simon Buckmaster
Select footage courtesy the AP Archive
[1] www.eh.net/eha/wp-content/upl...
[2] alu.army.mil/alog/2015/JANFEB... www.americanheritage.com/ikes... www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/sit...
[3] www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/sit...
[4] www.dot.state.al.us/publicati...
[5] www.brookings.edu/wp-content/...
[6] tripnet.org/wp-content/upload...
My dad used to say, "The interstate is incredible. You can drive non-stop from the Atlantic to the Pacific and not see a damned thing."
Pretty sure these roads were built to efficiently get you to your destinations, not for being a destination. If your dad didn’t see anything interesting it’s because he couldn’t be bothered to take exits and actually visit places. He chose to complain because of his lack of forethought.
@@zach11241 I'd rather drive US-50 over the close by interstates of 64, 44 and 70
@@zach11241 your comment is literally what his dad wanted to say. That it's so efficient that you won't see anything. All you're doing is agreeing while repeating what he said, but in more words/slower
Edit: pretty ironic you insulted someone's foresight but didn't follow your own advice lol
@@GolfClash2718 Well yeah. If I want the scenic route I'd take US-89 over I-15 but if I'm looking to get from Vegas to Idaho in less than a day I'm going to take I-15 every time.
This. The interstates are so boring.
People: You can’t put a price on a human life!!!
US Department of Transportation: $11.7 million
it's a fake/contrived number.
It is a surprisingly well thought number. High enough to not offend anyone. Low enough to be usable as a metric. And I think we can all agree that in reality most human life is worth much less than that if we consider their economic and social impact.
If I'm worth that much then why don't I get that money???
@@MCTogs Because that is only the value of your life as it stands for a safety perspective. Demanding that amount of money "since that's how much they say you're worth" only demonstrates a total lack of understanding what it even means
@@supernenechi sounds like government propaganda to me, if the department of transportation says I'm worth 11.7 million and I don't get a single penny then I might as well become a safety hazard
It's funny how back in 1919, trains were considered the dominant form of transport, with roads in desperate need of improved infrastructure. Now it's the opposite.
I was referring more to the transportation of people rather than goods. While I'm sure America's freight industry has done a fantastic job of keeping their tracks in good shape, you can't deny that the infrastructure for passenger service in the U.S. is absolutely abysmal.
@@IBeforeAExceptAfterK thats nost likely because there isnt enough demand for it
@@ronitjalihal2586 It's hard to create demand for something most Americans have never tried, or whose only experience was with a system so heavily neglected that it's only being held together with chewing gum and duct tape.
@@IBeforeAExceptAfterK Its also hard for trains to compete with planes in the distances Americans often travel.
@@homiej2548 You're forgetting about daily commutes and trips between cities which are relatively close to each other. That's where rail's niche is, not traveling across the country. Trains are supposed to compete with cars, not planes.
Fun fact: the interstates are numbered so that even numbers are west-east running and odd run north-south. Three digit interstates are loops for a given interstate. The lower number interstates are further south and/or west (i5 runs in the west coast states whereas i95 runs east coast states).
Not always though. i99 runs through Altoona, PA, and is farther west than i81, which runs through Harrisburg. i74 runs through Southern North Carolina, and is farther south than i64, which runs through Richmond, VA.
@@poisondog88 I believe though that the majority of i74 is further north than i64, but the bit in nc is just much further south and on its own not connecting much. But there are definitely exceptions
Surprised he didn’t mention this, the interstate is literally a grid across the US. I 10 from Los Angeles to Jacksonville, I 90 from Seattle to Boston. Pretty clever
And there’s a logic to the auxiliary routes too. If it is an odd number (I-390) it leaves the main interstate but doesn’t reconnect. If it’s an even number (I-405) it loops back to the main interstate
@@poisondog88 I-99 is an exception only because it was built so much later than everything else. The original plan from the 50s had 79 and 81, and there’s no other odd numbers between those, so they chose 99. Rep. Bud Shuster, the main guy that pushed for I-99, also used to ride trolley 99 when he was a kid so he liked that number
For comparison, Pete Kostelnick ran across America on foot with a world record time of 42 days, 6 hours, 30 minutes from San Francisco's City Hall to New York's City Hall in 2016.
Is that total or with rest
@@chrislambert9903 In total, running 3,067 miles. He slept 6 hours a night to cover more ground and faced snow storms, 35 mile per hour winds, and a major motor accident destroying his support vehicle.
Let’s think though, that was probably done on this road
Incredible! I could MAYBE do that on a bike or something after years of training but it would take me a month or 2 just to run to alabama from Georgia and I'm only 30 miles from the border lol.
No, he died in Nevada
I like how the highest ranking military officer in one of the greatest war mankind has fought and his conclusion was: "Man, infrastructure is really important"
Logistics is what wins wars, so it makes sense that he took that away from his wartime experience.
I heard from some serving soldiers that if you want big bucks when you go back to civilian life you go for a logistics related job role, as there is a lot of demand, and thus high wages for experienced people in that field once you get out.
6:20 Know where Gen Eisenhower “stole/copied” the invention of the Interstate highway system? From the leader of Germany in WWII (he who shall not be named lest censored) 🤬
There is an old saying, "Amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics." Many of the best Generals in history were such because they took that to heart.
He wasn't the highest rankng alone. He shared the rank with Macarthur who was the supreme allied commander of pacific theatre and became 5 star general 2 days before Eisenhower.
@@bthemedia And those Germans stole the ideas for the Nuremberg laws that disenfranchised the Jews from the Jim Crow laws of the South.
Fun fact: the I-5 was built through the Central Valley instead of along California's Pacific Coast so that it was less likely to be targeted in a naval/aircraft bombardment.
I never thought of that but it makes complete sense now that you mention it 🤔
@@metrofilmer8894 Considering the times and that they were military roads, that makes perfect sense. I remember that the original DARPA net lines were constructed near the Interstates, for the same reason. That became the Internet, of course.
The other thing is that Interstates, being flat and wide, can be emergency runways if air force bases or airports are attacked.
I have driven up PCH, a lot of time I was white knuckling my steering wheel through whindy roads where one side is a 200 foot cliff up and the other side is a 200 foot clip to the ocean the ocean. I think that is a reason as well. The cliffs wouldnt be so bad but how bad in snaked got to me.
@@CaseNumber00 It's not ideal for a four lane highway. It's routinely blocked by landslides. Not ideal to begin with.
Eisenhower gets seldom recognition for what he did for science in america...he was a visionary....father of NASA...father of interstate
He's the embodiment of pax Americana
Pity that the interstate is crumbling for how poor the maintenance in certain are is, Nasa is gettingittle funding so it can't really innovate as much and science is getting disregarded more and more
@Account NumberEight based and redpilled
@Account NumberEight And that makes the accomplishments of that era lesser somehow?
@Account NumberEight good one
That Eisenhower reveal was fantastic. What a legend.
ikr? I was like, "no way, no way... YES WAY HOLY SHIT"
@@janedoeYT I take it you like Ike.
The last truly great Republican.
@@vucub_caquix The absolute Chad even warned us about the military-industrial complex before he left
6:20 Yet Gen Eisenhower “stole/copied” the invention of the Interstate highway system from the leader of Germany in WWII… he who shall not be named lest censored. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichsautobahn
It's a shame we didn't take more from the Autobahn network, not going through city centers, allowing for no speed limits where practical, actually adhering to lane discipline, etc...
You would have to put a much higher investment into pretty much everything road related. I guess they thought it wasn't worth it.
For that to work you would also need to federalise driving standards. Your level of erratic driving is close to the Italiens, but with much bigger cars.
I don't know where you took that from, but the German Autobahns regularly go through city centres all over the place. Like, a lot. Also, lots of Autobahns actually do have speed limits, and the national debate on implementing an overall speed limit is getting ever closer to that being the case.
@@Semellie
He said "No speed limits where practical"
Letting highways passing trough cities is something i never understood.. such a weird concept.
You forgot to mention one important part of Eisenhower's life: His wife Maime was born and raise only about a mile from the Lincoln Highway. She fully understood how much of a lifeline having a trough road was to her upbringing.
@@johnperic6860 did you learn anything from this video? Those roads don’t all connect to each other like this
Another cool thing: they have long sweeping turns so you need to pay more attention and it’s harder to doze off. Every 5-10 miles though, they have a long straight section which is there in case the military needs to set up an emergency air base. There’s thousands of potential spots to turn into a runway all around the country. Brilliant design. Also, the interstates in West Virginia have parts that don’t comply with the regulations because they were built before the regulations came out and it would take too much work and money to change it.
Shoot, that is so cool to learn.
Were the roads built with that intention or did we just adapt to the way things were after they were built?
@@sidneyblack1036 the regulations can into effect in the 60s or 70s and most roads have been built since then or been upgraded. The West Virginia interstates are harder to upgrade because it involves removing part of the mountain.
@@sidneyblack1036 Interstate 64(east of Beckley) 79 and 77(the turnpike). The terrain does not make it simple to build a traditional Interstate there at all.
That part about requiring a straight section at regular intervals for the military is actually a myth. A quick Google search will bring up sites from the Federal Highway Administration, Reuters, etc. debunking it. Which is too bad, because it sounds pretty cool.
“A 7-hour trip from DC to Maryland”
Me, a Marylander: Did you just say SEVEN HOURS FROM DC TO MAR- you know what, that makes perfect sense and is still quite accurate
My bro used to travel from Northern VA for work to Greenbelt where he lives which easily took 1 hour and half hours.
"...on a monday morning."
495 traffic is fucking horrible
@@stovexlvii3579 I feel like we need to take infrastructure a step further and invest into more high speed trains. This could connect the country even more. Also it would reduce traffic a significant amount .
Traffic on the parkway can be a real bitch, no foolin'.
“Oregon has no major export ports.”
Shots fired PORTland!
If the interstate system didn't exist, there would be that many more ports! It is crazy to truck from Oregon to Oakland just get to a major port. Even if you get rid of the Jones Act, chances are much greater that goods would flow from Oregon and Washington to California via ship.
I mean Portland is a shithole
@@commisaryarreck3974 no one asked
@@commisaryarreck3974 make Portland weirder
@@commisaryarreck3974 is Portland a shithole? There I did ask him
Fun fact: Interstate 95 is the most recently completed interstate, having been completed in 2018 with the completion of the I-95/Penn Turnpike Interchange Project in Bristol, PA.
i live within I-95 and I-495’s reach. Wow!
Portions of I-73 in SC are still being worked on today!
That 12 mile run through the Rockies on I-70 is by far my favorite stretch of freeway and I've been on a lot.
The next big infrastructure project has to be the upgrade to railways and the addition of high speed rail.
It doesnt need to start big either, just start with HSR in the Acela corridor, then do Cali and Florida, and finally each coast and a trans-continental connection
Lol I just did the I 70 from Denver to gran junction today, Vail is def the most ghetto city in America 😂
So I think that there's not been a realization of the fact that high speed railways are slower and less efficient than flights at long distances especially across sparse terrain.
@@lukasnel4828 HSR is, indeed, slower than airliners at say, cross country flights, however, they are more environmental.
But nonetheless. What we need is HSR in the big metropolis areas. Northeast, Southeast, Texas triangle, West coast. Chicago hub. Way quicker, efficient, and environmental.
And then we need much better regional rail. Every small town used to have passenger train service to the nearest big city, now it's mostly just heritage lines and freight.
Look at Europe. There it is about the same conditions as what I mentioned above.
@@lukasnel4828 HSR beats out shorter trips, though. Seattle-Portland. Dallas-Houston. St Louis-Chicago-Milwaukee. Miami-Tampa. Etc.
The man whose idea it was to not have any stoplights on these highways is probably basking in glory in the heights of Heaven.
Highways don't have stoplights though. Thats why they're called highways. They're above the arterial roads
Probably Gilmore C. Clark, who basically followed the road logic of Central Park in Manhattan.
@@srirampatnaik9164 A highway is just a large road connecting cities, so a state highway may have traffic lights
@@srirampatnaik9164 those are freeways, not highways. Freeways are limited access, highways may or may not be.
@@tito_zz9217 Oh sorry, I confused it with expressways. But the interstates are essentially expressways?
Fun fact about the Interstates: On occasion, they were also used to experiment other things. The main one I know of the I-19, which was an experiment to see if America could convert to the Metric system. I was on it recently just to see it, and apparently, it's not too different from other Interstates, but most distance-related stuff is in meters/kilometers instead of miles. Exit numbers are based on the distance in kilometers (e.g. exit 101 is probably the last exit going north before you get to the I-10, even though the highway is only 62 miles long) and instead of mile markers, you get kilometer markers. The only thing that isn't in metric is speed limit signs, which are in miles per hour.
I live in tucson, I use i19 and i10 daily, its cool having the only km interstste in the country.
@@AtomicBoo i consider it kinda lucky and cool to have the only one in our entire country
The metric signs are completely off though. I measured them via Google Maps in the past and a simple 500 meter sign could be as much as 300 meters off, or more.
I think this exact topic is on a Half as Interesting video
I been on it too and I think also they use Km’s for the Mexicans driving on it …I’m Canadian and we use km’s too. I was surprised to see it myself lol
This is one of my favorite videos you have done. People take out interstate for granted. It really wasn't all that long ago that they even existed. Late 1950's is nothing compared to others. Eisenhower was the man of his time!
IT would be long days, weeks and months to get things done quickly
I'm with you. So few can remember a time without it.
I-95 had this strange discontinuity near Philadelphia. You would drive up I-95, then turn south in this sort of upside down U. You are shunted over to I-295, then cross into New Jersey on I-195 and rejoin 95 on the New Jersey turnpike.
They fixed this pretty recently --- fall 2018. I don't remember exactly how, but now I-95 connects to the Pennsylvania turnpike.
My father is a former military logistics specialist. He always told me that Ike's plan for the interstate system was to connect military bases, but also serve as emergency runways. This is really obvious on Oahu, where the interstates all terminate at military bases, and the section of H-1 near the airport is clearly engineered to accommodate landing a C-130 or C-17 cargo plane.
The runway thing is a myth. There are plenty of airports in the US to support emergency military traffic, which makes designing portions of the interstate for aircraft use unnecessary. The same cannot be said in Europe.
6:20 Yet Gen Eisenhower “stole/copied” the invention of the Interstate highway system from the leader of Germany in WWII (he who shall not be named lest censored) 🤬
@IWT what is strahnet designation?
@@EC-oe9bv I'd never questioned that idea, but with its 6 air strips, your point makes sense even for Oahu.
@@bthemedia So what, the Germans built a national highway first, and no no other country is allowed to build one? Do you realize how idiotic that sounds. This video even acknowledges that the US Interstate was inspired by the Autobahn.
"hey that guy in the convoy looks like Ike"
"Oh it is Ike."
We like ike.
@@michael_betts Ike for president, ike for president
I like.
Which one is he?
@@beback_ Guy on the right, I think.
As a resident of Salem oregon, I would just like to give a quick thanks to Dwight Eisenhower for all his hard work. We wouldn't be where we are today without him. Rest in peace.
One of the best Presidents, only appreciated in recent years it seems.
There you go! Let's thank the good people who made it possible.
Interstates serve defense purposes, too: If there are no suitable landing sites for military aircraft, for example if an invasion has disabled Air Force and civilian runways, planes can use the Interstate as a landing strip. I think there's a regulation that requires long, straight sections every hundred miles or so for this purpose.
The requirement is actually a myth according to the Federal Highway Administration. Although I’m sure much of it could be utilized as a landing strip if, God forbid, it was ever needed.
In my personal experiences it felt like every 25 miles or so.
Good luck doing it in WA state pot holes. Planes will be shredded.
its a myth
The "Eisenhower" Interstate Highway System's primary purpose initially, was to transport and move our nation's military from base to base and from coast to coast.
If only Cities Skylines was around back then so that they could've built the interstates with proper lane mathematics
Underrated comment 🤣
Hugo there
It's so horky borky as is
Well and the willingness to develop and use alternatives like public transport and such. A city in CS that mainly relies on an interstate like system is almost always prone to congestion, except when you have replaced half the city with highways
@@or2kr and increased taxes to pay for that public transit....
The construction of I-70 through Glenwood Canyon deserves a video of its own. The balancing of construction with environmental protection was truly amazing.
That stretch of road is super impressive. I’d love to see a video on it
And at this current moment , we cannot keep it open due to mudslides ….
While super impressive and beautiful, the recent fires and continuing extreme costs of keeping it open make it clear we should have just gone south through Cottonwood and then back north along the river to rejoin the Colorado at Glenwood. Leave the train going through the canyon and add the biking path and parking locations for nature stops and sight seeing but upgrading to a full interstate through there was a mistake.
@@simplyepic3258 I don’t have the exact links but believe a couple of semi truck driver videos on RUclips by Trucker John show it reasonably well.
As an engineer, driving thru Eisenhower tunnel on I 70 was a special moment to complete my coast to coast to coast road-trip. Super respect to the US interstate system, not only to the design and engineering, but also to the maintenance and vision. From China!
I think China would have had a similar explosion of durable commerce had it not half-arsed the HSR lines; passengers and mail only pay so much, cargo is far more profitable. Imagine if those all those viaducts were beefy quad tracks carrying bidirectional freight while G trains blow past them 🚄🚂
@@doujinflip HSR in China is start to shipping smaller packages. But the since the HSR is so important politically, there is not a chance that China will use if to carry freight. I am a railway bridge engineer I seriously think the HSR has been overly-babied for political reason. Building anything near, under and over it is such a painful process, that makes the HSR more or less inefficient. I do agree with you about the freight, we should build special HSR freight train to shipping high value cargo at 150mph, at least in some less important route. That makes the the train more profitable and more self sustainable
I live in Topeka KS. We were very lucky to be one of the first places in the country to have interstate highway. In fact were the first to have the test mile. My Dad took us out to drive on the test mile. By 1962 we drove to Washington State and down the west coast, largely on interstate highway . Eisenhower was from Kansas and the first interstate runs through his hometown of Abilene. Stop in and visit the Eisenhower library.
I REALLY appreciate that you have moved to a model of sharing a companion video on Nebula vs. an extended version.
With the extended versions I would debate if the frustration of scanning through the video to find the extra content was worth it. I usually wouldn't even try.
With the companion video, it is clear cut and easy. I believe I have watched every one you've released. Please tell your peers they should try this as well. It's increasing the value of Nebula and my engagement with the app.
amongus
I agree with you, even though I have a nebula subscription, I usually still watch from RUclips because it is more convenient, and it is easier searching for a companion video rather than the extended cut which can be anywhere in the video.
Completely agree, it was annoying trying to find the cut off point, especially because it was usually seemless
fact check true
This is the reason I unsubscribed from Nebula. I got so tired of watching a video to completion on RUclips, only to find out right at the end that I could have watched a better version on Nebula, but by that point it's not worth it anymore.
This might actually make me resubscribe again.
interstates between cities - fantastic. Interstates around cities - great (ring roads) interstates through city centers and urban neighborhoods (always low income) - DOG SHIT. The biggest failure of the interstate highway system is the insistance that freeways must go right through downtowns meanwhile taking up huge percentages of the total land available in an area already pressed for land. TRANSIT not urban freeways is the answer.
Yes, this is correct, but unfortunately a goal of the system in cities was to displace Black Americans
Transit is extremely expensive
@UCglcCBgsID4MBH5PNqjvVQA he didn't plan every detail, and he stated his regrets about how it happened
@@gvi341984 yeah but 20 lane highways are free right ?
@@gvi341984 compared to highways, it is the more sustainable option. There isn’t a highway in existence that is profitable.
I live in Colorado and I have to say, it has some of the absolute best driving in the US. Glenwood Canyon is a great example of that, as is Independence Pass near Aspen, not to mention all of the other roads through and around the mountains. I've also driven Route 66, nearly the full length of the PCH from San Diego to Washington, and numerous routes overseas for comparison, including SEA and the coast highway in Cape Town's peninsula.
The PCH does not go from San Diego to Washington. It goes from Dana Point to Leggett (approximately 1,050 km).
@@BritishMetric144 Highway 101, also known as the Pacific Coast Highway and the Oregon Coast Highway, and several other names, stretches from the border of Canada down to LA where it becomes Highway 1 / the Coast Highway, and becomes 5 in San Diego. I've driven from Astoria, Oregon (border of Washington) south to the border of California, and in 2019 I did Tijuana, MX to Monterey, CA up that same highway I just listed. Please do some research.
If you're talking Colorado mountain roads, you're right to include the Glenwood Canyon and Vail Pass sections of I-70. Also worth mentioning: Hwy 285 (everything west of Denver but especially Windy Point and Kenosha Pass), US 40/Berthoud and Rabbit Ears Passes, US 6/Breckenridge. Surely there are plenty of amazing drives I'm missing here, but these are my most memorable highlights as a 35+yr Coloradan and former Pine Jct resident/daily survivor of 285!
I work in Avon, and when the interstate and us6 were closed last week, I went through Independence Pass AND the canyon, it was awesome
As an Australian, I’m jealous with the design. It’s Crazy how way back in the 50’s, the highways were designed as all dual carriageway (4 lanes).
In Australia we obviously have heaps of really long highways but the only interstate/intercity highways that are dual carriageway the whole way is the Hume highway (Sydney to Melbourne) and the pacific highway (Sydney to Brisbane).
And even then, the Hume only finished upgrading to 2 lanes each way the whole way in 2013. And the pacific highway was even later than that.
So yeah pretty much all the regional highways here are single-lane except for those 2 and a few small ones that link places like Canberra, Bendigo, Ballarat, Geelong, Traralgon and Shepparton.
And yet America did it in the 50’s.
Just generally, one should not be jealous of anything that America did in the 50s. Unless your a oil baron or military officer, it did not turn out well for cities
@@BearsThatCare beauty perhaps yes but in other areas its quite useful.
One thing to keep in mind is that there needs to be the population to justify the infrastructure expense. The US population in the 1950s was ~150 million, whereas the current Australian population is ~25 million, and the size of Australia is similar to the size of the lower 48 states.
A total of 13 people live in Australia. How much road do you need?
@@ua2894 Really The Hume and The Pacific are enough, they link the 3 largest cities anyway, its probably cheaper to fly now with the price of petrol
A good portion lumber in Oregon is shipped on trains. Oregon’s got a lot of railroad throughout. Railroad is how it should be done. Shipping less than a carload by truck is way less efficient.
Yep
Also, Oregon is largely a semiconductor economy -- lumber and other natural resources are overstated as its exports
Depends on where the lumber is headed.
And Oregon does have a port city, Portland,
@@Artuchu The port of Portland has recently not operated as an export hub due to the longshorman's union causing shipping companies to move to California or Washington instead of striking a deal. This was in 2017. Some have come back, but most businesses are not taking interested in risking their supply chains again for the time being.
Fun fact: The guy who decided on green for interstate signs was colorblind and thought he was selecting blue. But it turned out to be a good thing since green is more reflected than blue.
That's the definition of a fun fact, thank you haha
Dopeeee
Also seems to be entirely made up… But the story that a colorblind guy is deciding colors for a whole country is amusing as a joke at least.
That is not only false but quite the opposite. William Potts, the invetor of the 3 color traffic light, chose these 3 colors because they are easier for color blind people to see the different hues.
@@leefinthewind2311 Right? So rare to see a fun fact that's actually fun.
This may sound weird but I am a HUGE fan of highways. Not because of this, but for a very long time I have been studying roadways like US, interstate, state routes, and even some county highways. When I watched this video, it was very interesting and everything is true. Thanks for making this video and I appreciate the love for highways.
i love them because its just a nice aesthetic lmao
Fellow neighbour here from the North🇨🇦. For business and leisure, I've taken several road trips throughout Canada and the United States, and I can certainly proclaim that the interstate system is superior to our own Trans-Canada highway. On most interstates, I was permitted to go at 75 mph (125 km/h). Also amazed by the amount of information provided in this video, as well as the fact that the creator incorporated both miles and kilometres to convey speed. President Dwight D. Eisenhower's and the labourers' efforts worked splendidly, and they will continue to benefit the future generations as well.
Does the Canadian government just not invest as much into your network due to how concentrated your population is relative to the US? (I could be wrong, but IIRC like 40% of the Canadian population is in Ontario?)
@@_colonial_ Yes, because a network expansion is not currently required because 90 percent of the Canadian population lives within 100 miles of the US border. The Trans-Canada Highway connects all major Canadian cities from east to west. The only investment they'll likely need to make in the near future due to population growth is to expand it from four lanes to six or eight lanes.
You should do a video on how the Olympic torch relay actually works. The back ups, the incidents, and the accidents.
I honestly really want a video on The Logistics of the Olympic Torch Relay now
The Internet Historian did a video on that
Mostly covering the incidents and accidents part though.
m.ruclips.net/video/YcuofODMCMU/видео.html
That would make a really cool Wendover video!
The absolute Chad that started it with a flaming arrow
Brilliant idea!
If there is one thing I really appreciate about these videos, is the conversion from Imperial to Metric. It's such a simple thing, but because I watch a lot of content from the US not having the conversions can get confusing. So just that bit of extra effort is so appreciated! :)
I find it rather annoying. Videos about the US should be in Freedom units, videos about the rest of the world in normal units. It drives me crazy to have conversions either way, as they aren't the units used in their areas.
I find it very annoying and distracting and makes it difficult to understand. When he says the numbers all so fast they blend together and mean nothing. What he should do is pick one of them and say that, then put a graphic on the screen with the other one so people can easily focus on one.
@@woodalexander Freedom units? Miles came from Imperial measurements and Roman ones. The Metric system won't kill you. I grew up on Miles and the old system but I can convert in a blink ...it isn't that hard.
@@aespa690 exactly !
@@marklittle8805 Metric won't kill be but in 'MURICA we use Freedom units. Everywhere else uses normal units. The units should be correct to the locality being talked about.
Can't believe I've just been watching HAI all these years when gems like this were out there. Your Wendover Productions jokes finally got to me and I'm so glad they did. Amazing video!
I grew up within a few hundred feet of the Interstate Highway System!! It was the sound to which I fell asleep at night, the reason a bit of soot could always be found in my windowsills, a focal point (on a map) in the part of town in which I lived, and a source of endless wonder and entertainment for me whenever my family and I drove over, near, or on it to get somewhere.
I've always been quite fond of it; I've come up with a bunch of grand upgrade schemes like aqueduct-style bridges for it to travel on over a large valley near where my house was, re-routing to make the journey on it straighter and more level, instituting the use of "speed range" signs instead of sticking to speed limits... the works.
However, I'd never taken the time to truly appreciate its simplicity and brilliance until watching this video.
To the creator: thank you for creating this gem. I commend you for your work and am glad that somebody else finds these giant stretches of road fascinating and awe-inspiring.
I've driven about 60% of the Interstate Highway System. So many epic sections from I-70 out in Colorado and Utah (Glenwood Canyon, Vail Pass, The San Rafael Swell), to the Grapevine along I-5 in Southern California, the Virgin RIver Gorge along I-15, the Franconia Notch along I-93 in New Hampshire, Interstate H3 in Hawaii, I-90 through Snoqualmie Pass, and the list goes on. Great video. FYI, if anyone is reading this, I and my friend Jim upload a multitude of time-lapsed driving videos under our FreewayBrent and FreewayJim names. I also have some footage from Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Cheers, Wendover Productions!
The US highway system is something beautiful
It's great to see the legends in here! As a traveler myself, I've enjoyed your videos over the past decade.
@@bighorn9119 the interstate system is communist and needs to be privatized and deregulated. It's inherently anti-american. 🌈
@@robertschnobert9090 what?
@@robertschnobert9090 😀
Moving from the US to the Dominican Republic has really made me appreciate this. It feels like a luxury when I am on trips back to the US
Im literally in DR rn, these highways are horrible. 40 miles here is 1+ hr, in the USA is 40 min
@@kingofkings1959 yeah but you're in the DR! Land of the best beaches, rum,cigar and princess enjoy!
Why’d you move to the DR if you don’t mind me asking
Why DR and not PR? sincere question.
@@erikdale9145 of course. I’m dominican I know
Thank you for sharing! This was very rewarding to see summed up so understandably.
Your comment at 15:25 reminded me of what General Mills did about 20 years ago. They had a massive production facility right smack in the middle of California in a small town called Lodi (yes the one in the CCR song) that they were closing down due to out of control union demands. So they started searching for a new location along the I-5 corridor as well as going east along the I-10 corridor in the southwest states. They almost chose a place in Oregon called Grants Pass but county officials (all business owners) forced them to stay out and so General Mills went the other way on I-10. Either way they required access to the interstate system and rail lines.
As a Canadian, I had no idea what roads could be until I drove from Michigan to North Dakota. Seriously, infrastructure is such a gamechanger, and we take it for granted so much.
literally
yeah, Canada could be awesome if we had more than 1 highway.
@@niubi42069the thing is, traffic is horrible near cities. It’s not so much the Infrastructure, just that there’s no people. If Canada and the US built good train systems, then the highways and trains would be used equally and traffic would be better.
@@niubi42069 Not much motivation when Canadians can just cross over and use I-90 and I-94.
The closest thing is BC's coquihalla which was modeled on Autobahn, Interstate and turnpike design standards but its a single special piece of road. Coquihalla design standards follow the autobahn's strict "no left exits period" policy though.
The “Interstate” part of the system was obviously important for the country. Putting it through the middle of cities was madness and has made US Cities the most unliveable in the OECD.
Really though would they have stayed not in the middle of cities? Where there's transportation infrastructure we've managed to build cities and towns on both sides.
@@9HighFlyer9 Nearly all other countries have built motorways around their cities. The US is usually cited as a reason to keep them out of cities.
@@gregessex1851 I'd say that it's probably not a great idea to plow through neighborhoods and lay down miles of concrete physically separating areas of the city. What's stopping development along a freeway that was built outside of the city? It happened with the rivers, the canals, railroads and highways. At that point you still end up with a freeway through the city.
@@9HighFlyer9 But then it happens semiorganically. People know it's there and can plan accordingly.
@IWT A failure to plan doesn't negate the opportunity.
As great as the interstate is, it should never had let to the US giving up on the rail system. Car travel is longer and pushing more Americans to drive wears down the road. We should’ve have had a healthy balance of rail AND road. That way if you want to drive you can but if you’d like to take rail (cheaper and often shorter) you’d have that option (plus we could’ve gotten high speed rail). Now we have to drive hours on terribly maintained roads or take an expensive airplane with long security.
We never gave up on our rail system though. It just got shifted to what was working, which was freight. We still have the largest rail system in the world and most of it is extremely successful. Besides rail wouldn’t have been cheaper and certainly wouldn’t have been quicker for most of the countries travel, maintenance wouldn’t have been meaningfully improved and the general threat of terrorism would have most likely made train travel just as slow with security. That’s not to say that we shouldn’t be spending more on passenger rail. I’ve always supported efforts to improve rail connections in different parts of the country
I agree still could have used the rail, Business along rail line are abandoned dumps and tracks ripped up, we are a throw away society.
Nice clip of I-90 into Mercer Island, WA from this Seattle resident. It's amazing how many of these nationwide Interstate shots that I've driven through over my 30 years of driving.
I'm really glad that you covered the negative impact that the interstate system had on cities. I would really love a video on the urban renewal that is coming about from the removal of freeways. One that I know of specifically is the one in Milwaukee which paved the way for the building of the new Bucks arena and surrounding entertainment district which has had a HUGE positive impact on the local economy and has made future development projects possible. It has honestly really brought the city together and it has made a nice gathering place that has a space for pedestrians that is separate from cars, which is one of the most important parts of the urban renewal movement
The people of San Francisco successfully shut down the construction of California SR 480 back in the 80s/90s, which turned an ugly overpass that encircled the city on its beautiful coastline into one of the best city roads in the country, complete with surface rail, bike lanes, and wide sidewalks. It helps that an earthquake destroyed it when it was almost done being built, too.
If you'd like to watch more that is critical of this, check out 'not just bikes' or eco gecko's playlist about suburbia
@@warw I know "City Beutiful" has done topics close to this but never exactly this point. I'll have to check those out
the interstate is spike driving through the heart of many major american cities. clogs them all up with cars. hopefully more cities will remove their highways in the future
@@poetryflynn3712 there's towns built along the interstate
route 66 travel was slow as
faster roads were necessary regardless
Most Wendover titles: The Amazing Logistics of
Today: The Simple logistics of
*simple genius
6:20 Yet Gen Eisenhower “stole/copied” the invention of the Interstate highway system from the leader of Germany in WWII (he who shall not be named lest censored) 🤬
Breeze I suggest you read the actual history of the Autobahn... prior to “the party” it was the “Lincoln Highway” equivalent and small scale... the party made it a strategic military asset for WWII - much like DARPA made the Internet.
Breeze here is a brief primer on Autobahn history - ruclips.net/video/ZGQwXjE29fc/видео.html
@@breeze9819 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichsautobahn
Eisenhower had a plan and a vision, and implemented it. He's massively responsible for the success that America has seen to this day.
Never really appreciated how incredible the interstate system is until I became a trucker. I can't imagine not having it
it would be over weeks to get things shipped
@@fgjr96waybut faster via rail
Ngl the highway system really separates the areas around Chicago. It feels like completely different states/areas just going to a different neighborhood.
That’s the inherent downside of the American highway system. Effective residential segregation between neighborhoods.
Keeps me safe lol.
@@theplayerformerlyknownasmo3711 and keeps me in a more dangerous area lol
Even where i live in Arizona, the Suburbs are behind the 1-10 and some fields and right across all that is the Ghetto main urban area, which looks a bit like Los Angeles, just in the Desert.
Chicago is a corrupt shit hole.
Regarding the numbering of interstate highways:
(1) 'primary' roads are all single- or double-digits, with the most 'major' ones ending in 0 or 5 (like I-5, I-80, or I-95)
(2) for these 'primary' roads, odd-numbered roads run north-south and even-numbered roads run east-west
(3) also for 'primary' roads, values increase from west to east (odds) and from south to north (evens); thus, I-80 runs along the northern part of the US while I-95 runs along the east coast
(4) three-digit interstate roads are offshoots of the 'primary' roads, with their last two digits signifying the 'primary' road; e.g.: I-295 and I-495 would both be offshoots of I-95 [these cannot repeat within a single state but can be reused by others, so one can have multiple I-295 roads in different parts of the country]
There's more
Roads that end in 0 are coast to coast
Roads that end in 5 are border to border
Three digit roads with an even number first go around a city (285 in Atlanta)
Three digit roads with an odd number first spur into and out of a city
In the UK we have 3ish numbered designations of roads:
M - Motorway (Like a US interstate) i.e. M1, M6, M5
Primary A-roads (Green signs) - Usually old major routes and connections between urban centres where a motorway isn't practical i.e. A59, A30, A39
Secondary A-roads - Usually link smaller towns + narrower i.e. A3083
B-roads - Usually connect villages to larger towns and the main route through a certain area i.e B3293, B3303
The first number of the road signifies where in the country it is i.e 3 for the south-west, 6 for the north-west, 1 for east coast. The number of numbers in a road designation usually indicates the seniority, i.e the A30 is more of a major route than the A394 or the A674, whilst the A1 is senior to all those.
@@keontre83 those last two points aren’t always true. 3 highways in Illinois disprove them. I-290 goes through Chicago, I-190 is just a spur to O’Hare airport, and I-355 doesn’t go into any major city and just serves as a connection between the northwest and southwest suburbs of Chicago
@@theleftuprightatsoldierfield there's exceptions to every rule.
Chicago, sitting right on the shores of a great lake, would of course provide exceptions. 190 does a pretty good job going around Chicago considered it goes all the way out to Bloomington, but it ends in Chicago because where else would it end?
To add to #4, if an offshoot begins in an even number, it circles a major city. If it begins in an off number, it connects two highways(not always 2 interstates)
thank you for mentioning the inefficient, poorly planned, and for some communities disastrous ways these highways tend to interact with cities. Important to learn about the good and the bad as we look forward.
So, you agree? An overwhelming good?
As a person who grew up 120 miles from the nearest Interstate, one of the most exciting parts of long road trips for me was the Interstate system, with its controlled access, opulently wide shoulders, elevated portions, multi-level interchanges, sometimes 3+ lanes in each direction, etc. It was clearly the Ritz of highways, and I felt privileged to be present on it. This is probably why I became an infrastructure nut. I was shocked to eventually discover that most people, even those who DRIVE, are far less excited about highways than I am. Those people probably live just a few miles from an Interstate and have been taking the system for granted their whole lives. Ungrateful swine!
I live in a city where two interstates come together and as a truck driver I always have appreciated the interstate system immensely.
I never take for granted the Palisades Interstate Parkway NY/NJ. It runs parallel to the Hudson River on top of high cliffs.the views are spectacular. I can be in Downtown Manhattan in 20 minutes ( speeding). It’s called a Parkway, because it has a lot of parkland on either side.
Lmao perspective
Interstates are great when going between cities. Highways are Awful when traveling inside a city. They were designed only for the first purpose, and do poorly at other purposes.
What country did you live in?
“Some lieutenant colonel” had me thinking, “wow, the disrespect.” Pretty good reveal there pal. We should have seen it coming.
It's especially impressive when you consider that the US is almost the size of Europe, *without* Alaska and Hawaii.
lmao where did you get that from? Europe is larger than the us
@@andreipopescul2439 Continental US: 3.797 square miles
Europe: 3.931 square miles
This is estimated so sources vary; my initial measure was inaccurate but *total* US with all 50 is larger than Europe.
@@burnttoast26 I think that's only the European Union, which is the majority but not the totality of the continent.
@@TheSpecialJ11 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe
That's all of Europe including Turkey.
@@burnttoast26 Um... 3.797 square miles? I kind of doubt America is that small
Thank you for providing the numbers not only in miles but also in kilometers. As a German I appreciate not having to look up/google every number. Thank you!!!
Per Wikipedia's Cannonball Run entry: As of October 2021, the overall record (NYC to LA) is 25 hours 39 minutes, with an average speed of 110 miles per hour (180 km/h), driven by Arne Toman and Doug Tabbutt along with spotter Dunadel Daryoush.
I personally love the interstate highway system and the way it connects cities. However, I also feel that has been a major roadblock for rail expansion in US which is comparatively better for the environment compared to car or an airplane. NYC-BOS is ~4 hours by car and ~1.5 hrs (+transfer from airport) by plane. Would be awesome to have a regular economically fared train that takes 2-3 hours or so.
I can tell you have never driven on I-95 in the State of Connecticut. The average speed on that section seems like only 25MPH so it has taken me like 7 hours to make the trip between NYC and BOS. Also there is the Amtrak Acela and Regional trains that take about 4 hours.
Trains are great and work excellently for city to city transport (and I think we definitely should invest in them) but if you live in even a remotely rural area then trains and other forms of public transport become infeasible. The sheer amount of rail you would have to lay to connect the rural US in a manner that's even rivals state highways would be incredibly carbon intensive and I'd imagine that in the end it would probably be no more efficient than just using the interstate.
@@mattguey-lee4845 My family and I have made that trip for years and we have never taken 7 hours, the most it has taken us, and this is with a Tesla (charging stop included) was 4.5 hours. We usually take Ct-15 to bypass some parts of I-95
@@brockcast4659 Completely agree to that. There needs to be a balance. Dense communities can be connected via trains. Having a train serve a remote location is not optimal. However, many govt. who have invested in it still try to connect them as it gives an opportunity for it to grow. Similar to 4 lane road systems extended to small rural communities when they were built. On paper it may not look optimal to build it for few hundred people. However, the expectation is for it to be the impetus for growth
@@mattguey-lee4845 I am actually from tri state area and I have used I-95 numerous times. I understand the traffic issue it has because of the busy corridor (try ct-15 it is relatively light on traffic and no trucks). The problem with Amtrak Acela is it is expensive (I have personally never traveled in it, so can not rate the experience) and regional trains are 4 hours from what I heard on paper. It does take a little longer than that. Also, another problem is greater boston area is not as well connected with rail transit as the greater new york area is. So, you end up needing a bus or a long cab ride from the south station.
I got another quirk of the Interstate Highway System for you. There’s a stretch of I-93 through Franconia Notch in New Hampshire that is the only two-lane freeway section of the entire IHS. It’s only one lane north and one lane south, and the speed limit drops to 45 mph. It is in conjunction with NH Route 3, and was granted the exception by an act of Congress to preserve Franconia Notch State Park, its trailheads, campgrounds, and scenic areas.
are you sure? thats interesting, but there are definitely stretches of I-25 in Colorado/New Mexico that are one lane north one lane south
There are a number of exceptions on the Interstate system. There is a traffic light on one in Syracuse NY during the fair season. A few rural ones in Texas have intersections so farmers can cross and access them.
@@bpugsy719 There may be others, but I think the distinction the is that this stretch of I-93 is the only “compliant” stretch because Congress approved it.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gaps_in_Interstate_Highways
I-93 is a two-lane divided parkway, or a "super two", through Franconia Notch in New Hampshire. A four-lane Interstate Highway was once proposed here, but the concept was abandoned because of environmental concerns, in part because of vibrations that could harm the Old Man of the Mountain rock formation (which collapsed in 2003 regardless). This section of highway was for many years marked as US 3 and "To I-93", but these have now been replaced with regular I-93 signs. The Federal Highway Act of 1973 exempts this 7.6-mile (12.2 km) stretch from the Interstate Highway standards that apply elsewhere, and this highway is considered to be I-93 for all practical purposes.[13] This section of I-93 in New Hampshire is now the only remaining multi-mile section of two-lane freeway on an Interstate Highway in the United States.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_two
@@johnathin0061892 The finer point may be a compliance thing. This stretch was approved by Congress, and therefore may be the only “compliant” exception to the interstate system.
I live in a remote part of the California desert. There are still reminders of life before the interstate system took over. Not quite ghost towns, but some small towns that used to serve US66 still exist in some sense. Before I-40 bypassed these towns they once thrived with gas stations, diners, and cheap motels. The buildings still stand as a sad reminder of the golden age of travel. Its sad to think of families that poured their lives into those businesses that fed motorists and kept their cars going.
Most travelers today only know fast food restaurants and big name hotels off the interstate exits. They have never eaten a greasy breakfast from a mom and pop diner or slept in a small motel room that reeks of cigarette smoke.
At the same time young travelers never creeped through the desert on US91 to Las Vegas before I-15 made it possible to blast that way at 80mph. Its undoubtedly a much safer trip but not necessarily as fun. I kind of miss stopping in all the little towns a long the way to spend a buck on a soda and Doritos.
Golden age of travel? Lol
Not much of a golden age when you have higher fatalities and slower speeds...
I still find those greasy mom and pop restaurants, my favorite kind. Still quite a few on US highways in Texas and New Mexico
Radiator Springs from cars is an example?
Driving that region sounds cool. Is it, in fact? Will it live up to my expectations when I finally get there?
Wendover doss it again! Thank you for all the amazing content
Ike campaigned for decades to build a national system of highways. The response from conservatives was always the same: "There is no business case for it." His proposed "System of Interstate Highways" was a nonstarter. Then he added two words to the title, and beat conservatives at their own game. Thus it became "The System of Interstate and Defense Highways". Ike was smart.
@Account NumberEight : Of course. That's where the money is, and has been for much of the past century.
@Account NumberEight : Some of it, certainly. The thing is that there is lots of money to be made providing products and services to governments at all levels honestly. One of the best ways to get into the top 0.1% income bracket is to provide a product or service to the federal government. Especially to the military-industrial complex.
And conservatives are STILL like that today...those mindless idiots want to keep our wages low because they think that having six hundred billionares controlling all the money is good for the economy.
@Account NumberEight Yes, that is where the bucks are, for the military. just reality, not criticism.
Proof that conservatives always set everything and everyone back. I don’t know why anyone likes conservatives. It was conservatives that supported slavery conservatives that wanted to succeed from the US and everything else. Even though the Conservative party used to be the democrats it flip flopped and now the Democratic Party is progressive.
I appreciate the history of the first ever Cannonball run
I hate the Cannonball Run. It encourages reckless behavior on America’s roads which lead to lots of suffering, injuries, and death.
@@evboto.5597 We do not care
@@evboto.5597 lol
@@evboto.5597 get off the road then
@@evboto.5597 cry
one of the most insane human achievements of all time is our road system. from my doorstep there is a continous mesh of concrete and asphalt leading to any and every destination on this contentent and even others. its almost difficult to fathom the scale of the US highway and street systems.
And one of the worst human achievements is how automobile dependent the US is.
@@JiiHate That's debatable
@@sweetembrace6706 meh my pfp was a random stock photo I needed to use to differentiate myself when using Google services years ago for discussions on projects.... That I have been to lazy to change. But I have found on the topic of whether cars are for good or for ill that opinions vary based on people's views of freedom and where the live. If you live in a city and have no desire to explore and go wherever you please without anyone to tell you otherwise. Sure I can see your poor view of roads and cars since all you see is the detriments. If you live in the rural country where your nearest neigbor is an hour walk and your nearest Red Bull a 20 minute drive, or you just don't like people telling you can and can't go. The road network is an extremely flexible and effective way to move goods and people esp. in the case of a crisis, without the fear of reprisal. Truely the road system is one of the best possible systems for a country with as much rural land as the US the strength of that system is the foundation of the econoic strength of the US.
@@wh0_am_152 If I were to live in a city, like 80% of the american population, I'd like to be able to get around without relying on the least efficient and most environmentally destructive option for my day to day needs. Sure, roads are an invaluable investment for rural areas, but once again, most people do not live in rural areas. So instead of trying to pretend cities are rural areas and ensuring cars are the only form of transportation, you could utilise the benefits of cities to make infrastructure suited to them, that people, not metal boxes, can actually live in. But no, we want the freedom to be forced to by a several thousand dollar car, which only really gives you the freedom to go where the government has decided to build roads.
@@user-cx9nc4pj8w Which is literally everywhere. Car ownership allows a society to be flexible and more able to respond to disasters, economic turmoil, and conflict, while also avoiding being under the government's thumb, making it harder for a tyrannical government to operate. Also just letting you know cities according to the 2020 census only harbor 30% of the US pop. Also if you are concerned about dirty we should stop exporting manufacturing to lower wealth countries such as China whom don't enforce many of the environmental regulations like we do and have been expanding coal capacity.
This is probably my fav Wendover Productions vid. I love driving/ road trips so it’s super cool to learn ab the background for interstates.
Honestly, it’s something we take for granted here in the US-so many other countries simply don’t have such a robust road infrastructure.
The US actually has the worst road infrastructure in the entire developed world.
Highest traffic fatality rate by far as well
@@johnperic6860 Stroads are completely inefficient and the US has a very underdeveloped public transport infrastructure and people who are pedestrians or cyclists are at danger as there are hardly any pavements or bike lanes and most other countries have developed public transport or at least a decent one and it has been proven that the US has the most underdeveloped infrastructure of any developed nation on the planet
If there's one place to remove the interstate highways it's the city centres
Yeah but it was too good an opportunity to destroy black communities for Robert Moses to pass up
Don't let this distract you from the fact that I get bullied because my classmates think my videos are the worst. Please don't agree, dear ben
That wouldn't make sense; why build highways then? Where would they be built?
@@gvi341984 Around cities? Not right through them?
City centres are destinations, not through-fares.
@@gvi341984 around the edges of cities, with less major roads going into the centres of them
I like the interstate system but we still need a metro and highspeed rail system that connects major urban centers.
AND to get as many of the dumbest, baddest drivers off of the roads as possible.
You ever drive down a busy freeway right before rush hour congestion officially starts backing up? Just a small handful of bad drivers with literally thousands of other drivers per hour is all it takes!
@@schwenda3727 And that is why I say unless you're an oil baron or a greasy car salesman then you should support increased investment in public transportation.
@@Androfier my grandfather who was in the military during the McCarthy era used to call my brother and I commies for wanting rail transit. Red baiting has never really died unfortunately
See the problem is .. the us is massive. A metro is just unfeisable. A rail less so but we'd need so much track I'd be impractical.
@@Androfier it is less effective in the rural areas because no one will use it. rural people want to go on their own time. they want to stop when they want and go when they want without being dependent on others.
Amazing video! explains accurately the history of the interstate highways in the US.
As someone who regularly drives through the Kansas i70 corridor, I appreciate that you used actual footage of the first interstate instead of generic b-roll.
About the deaths per mile comparisson, did that statistic include pedestrian deaths, as they and cyclists are the main victims of car related deaths due to poor infrastructure for everyone not in a metal box... and that could explain this difference as only cars are allowed on highways
No man,
I think the biggest reasons interstates are so relatively safe is the controlled access and divided nature between oncoming traffic. If someone oncoming falls asleep at the wheel on an interstate, I have a much better shot of avoiding them than if they do the same on a smaller, two lane state road at 70mph.
It's also an incredibly silly idea to suggest that the inner States don't contribute to that's on those personal roads because if the complete dependence on other transportation that the inner States provided America didn't happen then driving on those profile Road to be substantively less crowded and therefore safer
well on some interstates bikes are allowed as well (when there's no good alternative route, for example I-90 crossing the Columbia river)
@@prplt without cycle lanes?!! I am already uncomfortable on a road with a speed limit of 70 km/h on a painted cycle lane...
I happened to pickup a National Geographic Map of the US dated September 1956 at a national park last year they were clearing out. Verified this map shows none of the Interstate, but it shows initial construction of Topeka to Kansas City and some of the other initial plans in Kansas & Florida.
See i was always told it was KC to STL first, not Wichita to KC. I guess I was told wrong back then.
6:20 Missed that Gen Eisenhower “stole/copied” the invention of the Interstate highway system from the leader of Germany in WWII (he who shall not be named lest censored) 🤬
I'm old enough that Interstate 5 didn't exist when I was a child. To go to Portland, where we had family, from Orange County involved going up the PCH, which involved winding around mountains, to whatever Oregon had. Getting into Portland involved hours of switchbacks stuck behind semi trucks. I-5 shaved hours off the trip, I don't recall how much.
Where I lived, there was a 50 mile gap from the next town. It took them years to build it. It literally stopped at the edge of town.
The world you described without the interstate system sounds preferable in a lot of ways to the one we currently live in.
WE live in a rush society now, a road along the interstate would be hardly not much traffic
Evergreen truck: travels on interstate 5
Oregon: sweats profusely
Underrated as fuck
Don’t worry, it’s driven by a man.
I was on I95 last week going from the bottom of Florida to the top of Virginia. The drive was about 16 hours. Hearing it takes a coast to coast trip took 2 months before Interstates existed sounds terrifying.
Love that there was some footage of a German highway included, the kne where it panned from the parking bay over the road
I compare this nationwide standardisation effort with metros in the PRC, and I wish the USA could do it again with public transit in providing national standard designs and incentivising standard appropriate rolling stock (light rail is currently overtasked, too small to handle urban+suburban passenger load)
Here to appreciate Wendover putting both imperial and metric system in his explanations in the video. Good job, keep it up.
The interstates are great but I would still love a similarly large passenger rail network, preferably high-speed where possible, in addition. Trains are safer and less polluting than cars and easier to travel on than planes. It's like a happy medium.
agree, but important to remember that the biggest benefit from the intestates doesn´t come from domestic travellers but from cargo. Still would be nice to see (at least two different disconnected networks for the mainland since nothing will change that the us is a huge continental nation)
Europe's model did both, but without running the motorways through the center of cities. Wish the US had followed this a little closer.
True, but you also have to remember that the US is twice the size of Europe wjth half the population, so the lack of density makes it harder. In reality people will only take a train for trips of max 5 hours, otherwise planes are faster. Even if we had the highest speed train that exists, it would still take about 16 hours to go from coast to coast - flying is just faster. Where HSR DOES makes sense is corridors - northeast, Houston-Dallas, South Florida, etc
@@Matt-wc2mf not too late
@@anthonydpearson yepp, the best would be 2 separate systems for high speed. Since poor people would use bus or car and middle and upper classes would still use car or plane then the la-ny trip is for the very few enthusiast, for whom a regular low speed or even a steam powered train is enough to make most of us happy
Everyone in Colorado has been through the Glenwood section of I-70 at least once , and I'm not the only one who still is awed every time I do.
I remember when I-10 didn't pass thru the metro Phoenix area. It took a long time to travel from our western suburb of Litchfield Park in the 1970s to the inner city. Then 1-10 finally connected us (one new mile/exit each month) to the rest of the valley so that Santa Monica, CA ws not completely connected to Jacksonville, FL. They resisted it in the 1970s here but a few things changed that suddenly reamped things up in the 1980s when I was in high school.
They should’ve built a parallel high speed rail network in high traffic corridors (SF-LA, NY-Chicago) to relieve congestion and better spread out the load
NY to Chicago is far though, Detroit-Chicago and Boston-Dc would be more feasible
@@patricke825 NYC to Chicago has Albany, Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo, Erie, Cleveland, Toledo, Fort Wayne, And South Bend between them. That’s plenty of ridership potential.
@@thefareplayer2254 Why would anyone go via Upstate NY between NYC and Cleveland? It’s so out of the way.
@@thefareplayer2254 "Albany, Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo, Erie, Cleveland, Toledo, Fort Wayne, And South Bend" Hmmmm. We'll have to change the name from fly-over states to rail-through states.
California voters back in 2008 voted to create a high speed rail to connect SF to LA but Republican counties said it would cost too much ...even though CA voters voted for it to happen. To continue their argument, they organized and decided to sue at every chance they get when construction begins in a red county. This costs money from stalling the project and court/lawyer fees thereby inflating the initial costs of when the project was purposed. They then, and even now, keep pointing to the high costs of the project as proof as a waste of money and blah blah bad Dem leadership...which the Reps created themselves. I voted for this when I was 18 in 2008 hoping by now I would enjoying rides to N. California.
You started a war between train lovers and car lovers
Edit:Most likes I’ve gotten thanks guys
Why can't we have both trains and highways?
@@rajashashankgutta4334 yep. Trains from city to city, highways within the countryside and from country to city. The problem is the one-size-fits-all approach.
@@rajashashankgutta4334 because they are inherently incompatible. Having trains means that when you reach a destination you should be able to get around your destination without the need of a car, meaning good public transit. Having highways means you should be able to get around your destination by driving. While a balance is possible, Having both as the main form of intercity travel for the masses is infeasible
I love both
@@hwong1776 well you can use public bus service on highways(for those who can't drive for long time spans and to provide cheap public transport in relatively low traffic areas).
Regarding intercity travel, public bus service can be used to connect relatively low traffic countryside with each other and with neighbouring towns and cities.
The greatest economic distribution system ever designed would have been a federalized, and greatly expanded and specialized rail network.
But it wasn't because we chose a system of self destructing chaos disguised as freedom.
i love trains but back in the 50s and 60s they thought trains were to slow thanks to the "Interstate Control Commission" Trucks and Busses would be quicker😞😞
The interstate highway system was and is certainly needed. However, at the time of the conception of the system, the US ALREADY HAD a massive, developed transportation network… the railroads. Every other developing nation invests in rail infrastructure, yet the US continues to let it’s rail network crumble. In the Midwest, and along the coasts, there was an extensive railway network. The railroads crisscrossed and interconnected counties and states quite thoroughly during the 1st half of the 20th century. The construction of the highway system destroyed the rail network, with thousands of miles of track being abandoned or removed altogether. By the time the states and federal government stepped in and assumed ownership of the less profitable routes being abandoned, the rail network was already decimated. It’s a shame, really. Moving products and people by road is the most expensive way, in terms of tonnage per mile and fuel consumption per ton per mile. Had a comparable amount of planning been done with the existing rail network, we could have had a much more efficient and cost effective system of transporting agricultural and industrial commodities than what exists today.
My grandpa was born in 1932 and was a businessman in both the railroad and trucking industries and he always talked about how sad it is America gave up its incredible rail infrastructure. Rail really is the superior form of transport so long as you build your real estate to match, which we had.
Most things you see in the store still travel by rail, but the last mile is delivered by trucks. Look around big truck terminals and you'll see container cars and a diesel engine. Rail is more of a freight network then a passenger network. We have these things called big old jet airliner...dont' carry me too far away...Big ol jet airliner...cause it's here that I got to stay.
On the main railroad line between this town and the next one East, there are at least 100 trains that pass through here everyday. Most d-bags when they complain about the 'deterioration of rail' are only referring to passenger service. Americans don't care much for passenger rail outside of big-city subways. Rail freight, on the other hand, is stronger than ever.
Dead WRONG. The railroads are quite efficient at what they do best...MASS FREIGHT. There's no need for any Soviet-style "planning" with respect to railroads for that purpose, they do fine as is, as the market demands. Passenger service via rail was never a huge money maker for the railroads, save in a few markets, like the Northeast, like with the NY-Penn Central, where it actually made economic sense, the railroads more or less defaulted to private auto and later aircraft travel. One need look no further than the miserable example of Amtrak over the past fifty years to show the effect of getting the Government involved in passenger transport.
It's also short-sighted to evaluate movement of private individuals, whether it be for business, commuting, or pleasure travel, as an Army logistics officer would do, in terms of, say, planning the movement of a tank regiment with all its equipment and personnel. Trains work for private citizens when their linear routing works for their needs, but there can be but relatively few rail lines, train stations, and rolling stock, so, by definition, passenger train travel isn't very flexible. Automobiles are, and it's the motorist that determines it's value, not some smug "urban planner", for his transportation needs. Indeed, a private citizen driving his ride to wherever he can afford to go, for whatever reason he deems fit, driving on the highways and roads paid for by the FUEL TAXES he pays at the pump, is the most "liberal" and "democratic" means of "public" transportation. Is it "perfect"? Probably doesn't seem that way at rush hour, but neither is being jammed in with the rest of the sardines on a subway or commuter train all that great an experience, either.
@@selfdo Nice. I would've used less words.
This is twice as interesting
Nice afro
@@Student0Toucher thank you 😊
It's crazy how i was suddenly interested in learning about the interstate's history a week ago and been watching older videos and now one of my favourite channels drops a fresh video. Thank you so much for this!
I'm actually doing a challenge to drive the entire Interstate system (1-2-3 digits) and from their very start point to their very end, to the last inch. That includes also all the unsigned Interstate highways too.
Right now I've done all of the West, Midwest, lots in the East too, approximately 72-73% of the entire lenght of the system.
Im a trucker and i like Interstate system its just awesome 🤩
Good way to enjoy America landscape ,hills, mountains and valleys rolling from Cities and Cities, taking it easy.
As a Professional driver this subject is near & dear to my heart. Although, the top speed on I90 goes upto 75mph in South Dakota, I94 reaches a max speed of 75mph in North Dakota and 80mph in Montana.
You are correct that those are the speed limits, but the speeds reference in the video are only minimum design speeds used during engineering. The actual posted speed limits will vary. There are also examples of speed limits being lower than this design speed, mainly in the Northeastern states like NY and MA which have speed limits of 65 mph on I-90.
@@likesorange additionally, the "Effective" speed limit is what the police enforce. Where I'm from you drive 60 when its posted 55 (also the interstate is an hour away). And on the interstate 65 posted means that you can drive about 72 without fear.
I'm sure this effect is taken into acount when posting speed limits. (But in low limits like 45 and lower off the interstate I drive the posted limit)
Fun fact: once someone was caught doing 80+ in my school zone thats posted 20, I'm sure that was instant license pull.
There are some 80 mph zones in Utah as well
I90 thru SD is 80 MPH, and 70 in MN.
Does anyone even really pay attention to speed limits that much on freeways though? In California the spirit of the law is basically stick to the speed of traffic and you’re fine, which in the fast line is routinely upwards of 80-90. But that might be everywhere. California also doesn’t have a law against cruising in the left lane so.
The INSANE logistics of the interstate highway system
The complex simplicity of the insanely genious interstate system
12:00 the interstate acually kills people, because if there were no interstates, very much fewer people would drive their car. they wold use safer and/or faster methods, like trains or planes
There would be more accidents and deaths, people are impatient more these days, as we live in a I do what I want to do and who cares society
Thank you for this amazing gift
Man, that 1919 trip across the country sounded like an epic adventure. I've gone coast to coast myself, from West to East and back West. I spent an entire month zig-zagging across North America.
I can't imagine doing that back then. Sounds amazing.
As someone that drove 1,600 miles on the interstate the other day, I agree with the fact that the system is simply amazing!
What an irony! If America had the rail transport systems like Japan or China, you wouldn't have had to drive at all.
@@kmseyam7897 Japan has a density that is 10x higher than America. Not comparable at all.
@@kmseyam7897 Maybe I want to go on a road trip? I like a good rail network but trains cant go everywhere, especially in a large country like the US.
@@daelbows5783 And plus, people in the US are a lot more spread out. While some places can be served with rail and stuff, that can't be said with other places.
@@daelbows5783 then what about China?! They are building bullet Train routes to Lhasa,Tibet and xinxiang province which have similar population density to alaska!
ruclips.net/video/kDdG7ObinG4/видео.html
Btw, american east coast has enough population density, why hasn't there been a better high speed train system yet!? FYI, It is a matter of political will, not just population density.
For those wondering why Oregon doesn't have a major port even though we literally have a 'Portland' (where I live), its because long story short, our port died due to costs and Seattle/LA taking our business... they used to be quite important, but now we unload less cargo in an entire year than LA does in an hour.
I did wonder that.
Imagine if you guys were the Gateway of the West for major shipping i-305 and i-505 would be really needed in Oregon
@@fgjr96way That would be awesome
These interstate roads are amazing, but there's definitely room for improvement and making them even more breathtaking and efficient.