Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

2024 Toyota C-HR review: 0-100 & POV test drive

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 июл 2024
  • 2024 Toyota C-HR review: 0-100 & POV test drive. For more info and insight, check out our full review here: drivingenthusiast.com.au/2024...
    2024 Toyota C-HR GXL specifications:
    103kW (140PS) 1.8-litre 4-cylinder hybrid
    CVT auto transmission with front-wheel drive
    Claimed 0-100km/h: N/A
    Official average fuel consumption: 4.0L/100km
    Tare weight: 1430kg
    Boot space: 388L/1155L
    Price: AU$42,990 (not including on-road costs, at time of upload)
    For all of our Vbox performance test results, see the full data table here: drivingenthusiast.com.au/perf...
    For all of our latest car reviews: drivingenthusiast.com.au/cate...
    And our latest car news: drivingenthusiast.com.au/cate...
    Follow us on social media for extra insights and updates.
    DE on Facebook: / drivingenthusiast
    DE on Instagram: / drivingenthusiastaustr...

Комментарии • 61

  • @James-xs9mn
    @James-xs9mn Месяц назад +18

    My god are we Aussies getting bent over with new car pricing post covid, 50K for this thing? Yikes.

    • @mvnorsel6354
      @mvnorsel6354 Месяц назад

      Are the prices lower in other countries? The Oz $ is low.

    • @rav05pimpin
      @rav05pimpin Месяц назад

      Where did the 7k mark up come from?

    • @James-xs9mn
      @James-xs9mn Месяц назад

      @@rav05pimpin Toyota Australia official site, current drive away for the GXL which is base model is $47,717 which is close enough to 50K. the next step up is 55K for the Koba and the GR Sport is an eye watering $60K Fucking nuts imo.

    • @peter_smith
      @peter_smith Месяц назад

      Unfortunately, this vehicle attracts the European car tax because it is made in Turkey. I have the GR-Sport model. Excellent vehicle and while it is somewhat expensive, the amount of tech onboard in this model is fantastic.

    • @peter_smith
      @peter_smith Месяц назад

      @@rav05pimpin Huge jump in onboard tech plus European car tax

  • @kamaldaruwalla6172
    @kamaldaruwalla6172 14 дней назад +2

    Great review! I have been looking for a review of the GXL model for a long time and finally stumbled upon yours.
    The straightforward, no frills explanation is what we need when carrying out our research, the reviewer does need to be over friendly or humorous, but to the point.
    Driveway @ $ 47 + K for a brand-new car sounds a lot, though not these days.
    What one gets in the base GXL version is a great looking car, bound to turn heads with a 360 degree camera, Wireless ACplay and AndAuto, 10 airbags, plenty of safety features, a great hybrid, 17 in. wheels (cheaper to replace), low service costs, a 388 litres boot and the clincher for me a space-saver spare tyre!
    As a 60s something urban dwelling female, that's all I need!

  • @bazinga615
    @bazinga615 Месяц назад +6

    Brilliant review quality. Thanks for not mincing your words and calling out brands that need highlighting for real world not matching their excel spreadsheets of specs. This new CH-R is now made in Turkey, I believe. How was the build quality?

  • @crez1988
    @crez1988 Месяц назад +3

    they should’ve given the option to have the 2.0L engine on the GXL and koba

  • @peter_smith
    @peter_smith Месяц назад +1

    You don't need to tape over the Driver Monitoring Camera ...it can be turned off in the settings menu. I leave mine on as it does Face ID to identify the driver. This allows the car to set driver seat position, HUD position, external mirror positions, air conditioning and radio station based on that drivers presets.

  • @dimitrisv3302
    @dimitrisv3302 6 дней назад

    How the floor is complete flat with rear seats down; when i test drive it it hasn't that option. There was a gap from the floor of the boot to the edges of back seats

  • @tonycoz2309
    @tonycoz2309 Месяц назад +2

    $43K for a small car!....what has happened to the price of cars over the last year or two!

  • @dingus2218
    @dingus2218 Месяц назад +2

    4.7L/100km after what you do to these vehicles is bloody good

    • @peter_smith
      @peter_smith Месяц назад

      After a fast run down the M1 from Brisbane to the Gold Coast followed by a drive from Southport to Tweed Heads I got my GR-Sport down to 3.9l/100km.

  • @TechHead03
    @TechHead03 Месяц назад +1

    We used to call these type of things "hairdresser cars" - all show, no go 🤭

  • @spiro5327
    @spiro5327 Месяц назад +1

    What will you do when road works iron out that bump that features on your reviews ? 😅

  • @rimloch3919
    @rimloch3919 Месяц назад +2

    Sport styling design but performance is far too slow😢 it would be nice and acceptable if at least 0-100km/h in 7 seconds area.❤

    • @peter_smith
      @peter_smith Месяц назад

      The 2.0L AWD version does 7.9s

  • @tonestar0183
    @tonestar0183 Месяц назад +1

    Anything over 10secs for 0-100 I feel is dangerous.

  • @sodazman
    @sodazman Месяц назад +2

    They're super slow, I would know because I bought my wife one.

  • @aygeeninty771
    @aygeeninty771 Месяц назад +1

    I don't think these Toyota Hybrids are amazing in terms of fuel efficiency. I use them at work as fleet cars and find them meh. Cars with diesel were so much nicer to drive like the Golf, Focus etc. Why do we do these things seriously 😂

    • @MattyClivingthedream
      @MattyClivingthedream Месяц назад

      In terms of highway consumption, diesel is great. But city, my experience they use double what a hybrid consumes and sometimes more than equivalent petrol. Add to the nasties that these thing pumped out and they should be banned.

  • @edaniel927
    @edaniel927 5 дней назад

    50k for a Toyota made in Turkey? Will not buy any Japanese car not made in Japan. Quality control will never be the same. Expected problems like any other European car.

  • @hartoz
    @hartoz Месяц назад +2

    It looks worse than the 1st gen CHR.
    Toyota make another vehicle for people who don't care about cars.

  • @waltermolina7115
    @waltermolina7115 Месяц назад +2

    42 m to stop!

    • @drivingenthusiastaustralia
      @drivingenthusiastaustralia  Месяц назад +7

      In damp conditions - as noted on the results page.

    • @zaamuro8408
      @zaamuro8408 Месяц назад +3

      It is wet...

    • @kareembaba7498
      @kareembaba7498 Месяц назад +1

      You didn’t read the read the results

    • @user-ke1kg3fe6d
      @user-ke1kg3fe6d Месяц назад

      Let's take a look at the Subaru Crosstrek...
      43.9m to stop !?
      On a dry road ???

    • @waltermolina7115
      @waltermolina7115 Месяц назад

      ​@@drivingenthusiastaustraliasorry, didn't saw it

  • @mrx168
    @mrx168 Месяц назад

    Those 0-100 times… yikes

    • @drivingenthusiastaustralia
      @drivingenthusiastaustralia  Месяц назад +3

      The 146kW GR Sport version would be interesting. I'll see if I can organise a test of that soon.

    • @mrx168
      @mrx168 Месяц назад +1

      @@drivingenthusiastaustralia looking forward to it

  • @Marc-ww6fw
    @Marc-ww6fw 7 дней назад

    Hey Toyota, keep this one in your showroom as well! Way overpriced just like all these new cars coming out that you rarely see on the road... Geez I wonder why! You'd have to have more money than brains for this one.

  • @KSGT2023
    @KSGT2023 Месяц назад

    EXPENSIVE, SMALL AND SLOW!

  • @BigPoppaAA
    @BigPoppaAA Месяц назад

    What an abomination in vehicle design inside out!

  • @mahcooharper9577
    @mahcooharper9577 Месяц назад +2

    It's pretty tasteless and not even an appealing type of car (not that I'm in their target demographic for it) but its nice to aee that they bothered to deaign and build it properly. I'd back it to be running a long time from now and retain its value which is a better way to go than buying a horrible (if cheap) throwaway Chinese junker.

  • @ytyndale3643
    @ytyndale3643 Месяц назад +1

    Wow this is just terrible, why are Toyota selling this slow expensive junk? Dangerous on our roads.

    • @peter_smith
      @peter_smith Месяц назад +3

      Strongly disagree. Try owning one and then make your comment rather than doing it after watching a ten minute video

    • @mahcooharper9577
      @mahcooharper9577 Месяц назад +1

      How fast do you really need it to be? It's a city car - look at the fuel consumption, it's not trying to be a sports car.

    • @ytyndale3643
      @ytyndale3643 Месяц назад

      @@mahcooharper9577 It's not even a general car, it has acceleration figures of general cars from the late 80's. Merging at high speed in these cars has become dangerous in 2024 because modern cars are generally quite quick.

    • @ytyndale3643
      @ytyndale3643 Месяц назад

      @@peter_smith I don't need to own it to appreciate the slow acceleration figures, imagine overtaking on a highway. You would put your foot down and it would barely move, too bad if a truck is coming the other way soon and then you have the problem of the person your overtaking toying with you because they can see you are struggling to get in front. It's very dangerous, people don't realize that acceleration can actually save your life in a car.

    • @mahcooharper9577
      @mahcooharper9577 Месяц назад +1

      ​@@ytyndale3643 0-100 in 10 seconds isn't quick but it is a long way from the slowest vehicle on the road. Delivery vans are slower than that, especially laden, and they cope fine getting on and off freeways. Let alone trucks etc.
      Brett tested a 2023 MG3 and without stalling it up it did 0-100 in 13.3 seconds. With brake hold 12.7 seconds. That's MUCH slower than this. Did you make the same comment on that? Are they dangerous too?