if you create a regular sized dice that contains a googol numbers, it'll be a sphere with sides so small it breaks the law of physics (probably, I haven't tried)
If I rolled all those dice, the odds of those dice landing on the same number is still greater than: •plugging in the USB correctly first try •having a test without double sided papers •finding happiness in life
I knew it was going to be a huge chunk but I'd never imagine it'd be much bigger than the observable universe. The magnificence of greater numbers are insane.
2:07 By this point, if that amount of dice were just floating next to each other in the middle of space somewhere, gravity would have rounded them into a planet
i dont think so. i dont think dice are dense enough. it would be more like one of those asteroids that are actually just a giant ball of dust floating in space.
@@the_Acaman i know you weren't replying to me but just so you know dice would not form a planet. planets form when particles and materials are attracted to young stars via gravity. overtime the particles accumulate to form planets. dice would not have anywhere near enough gravity to form a planet, and their small size and shape would not facilitate the accretion process required for planet formation.
If you travelled by the zettaverse, the probability of finding our universe and inside our universe find earth and in earth find your house, is still higher than yall finding your lost pegh-
When counting the volume of a cube, the amount of units also raises to the 3rd power: 🎲 size: 16 mm 🎲 volume: 16³ mm³ = 4096 mm³ Same with "37 quad. cubic light years", which should also be raised to 3rd power.
@@Bober26681 The unit is cubed, but the number is not. 37 quadrillion light years - that's the side length of a cube made of 10^100 🎲. (16 mm x cube root of 10^100). The volume should be 4.84 x 10^46 cubic light years.
0:55 When American use metric system. At left, you have 4 cube of 1 cubic meter, so it makes 4 cubic meters At the center, you also have 4 cubic meter, not 1.6 cubic meter. Because a cube with a side of 1.6 meters is 1.6*1.6*1.6=4 cubic meters.
for my calculations it'd probably just be 3.7x10^16ly to the power of 3.7x10^16ly which is probably about a number with quadrillions or quintillions of zeroes
I am going to cry and have a mental break down from this, I feel EVERY EMOTION that human beings have ever felt wrapped into one!!! I want to cry tears of ecstasy, horror, victory, defeat, anger, and sadness all AT ONCE. The sizes of these volumes make me have ALL of these emotions for so many different reasons.
Or if you were counting the numbers that the dice would have, you can get a extremelly high poly sphere and make it big. Then place the numbers in each polygon. Boom, you made a googol dice that you can actually use, you just need an extremelly powerful pc
okay, so it'd just be a sphere yeah? The sides would be of such miniscule size that they'd like be indistinguishable from one another except underneath micro-lenses. More still, the color of the damn thing would probably be gray, or at least some manner of off white. Edit: Referring to a googol-sided die
Good visualization! I can't even imagine the horror of what Graham's Number of dice would look like in the same way. Or even the number of zeroes in it. (for comparison, Googol has 100 of zeroes, they can be represented by 5x5x4 dice, but Graham's Number is totally different)
@@GunZnRifles Yes, that would be the next level probably ) But right now, how can it even begin to be calculated? In comparison, Graham's Number is calculatable, you just need enough memory to store its digits or at least its order, i.e. number of digits in it, or at least the number of digits in its order, ot at least the number of, lets say, digits in the height of its power tower, and so on. And its calculation can be done in steps, where every next step requires exponentially more memory (in fact this amount grows much more quickly than exponentially) to store the result, so it is possible to stop at some point and begin to have an idea about the requirement for the next 1 or 2 steps, or at least something to metaphorically compare the result in the next step to. The Three(3) by comparison is not yet calculatable at all.
I always thought that a island full of plastic would be bad for the ocean, but something tells me that a googol dice would probably not fit in the oceans. (Edit: wait 100 likes in 3 weeks ayyyoooooo)
The reason engineering notation is used is to quantify then manipulate extremely large or small quantities. If you did this same thing in reverse from the base unit, even the best theoretical physicists can't quantify or observe the fabric of matter that makes up all of existence
At 0:12 I think you mean the average die is 16x16x16 mm, which is 4096 mm3. A 16 mm3 die would have 2,5 mm sides, which would be hard to use. With 16 mm sides you would indeed get about 63 in a meter.
I was shocked seeing that we got to the observable universe without at 10^100 I could imagine some random number like 100000^100000000 and would be lost where it would go😂
for perspective, if you took two different decks of playing cards and combined them then there would be more than a googol ways to shuffle the big deck
Multiplying by the highest number (6) is equivalent to: 6*10^100 Then (10^100)^6 is bigger. A number past 2^1024 (2^^3). It is equivalent to: 1*10^600 It will be: 1 Novemnonagintacentillion
The Cube Would Be More Than 169.12 Sexvigintillion Cubic Light Years In Volume (Less Than A Googol Meters Containing 100 Duotrigintillion Dice On Each Side…), Which Would Be More Than 6 Unseptuagintillion Times Bigger Than The Known Observable Universe / About 46 Tresexagintillion Times Larger Than The Complete “Cosmic Inflation” Universe… (All Of The Stacked Dice Would Be Less Than 345 Paper Folds In Length, Which Is Why 5.25 < 7.58, Or The Estimated Amount Of Duotrigintillion Meters For Each Of Them…)
I heard that only about halfway through this list, it already exceeds the number of atoms in the known universe, making the rest of the list truly theoretical numbers.
You guys ever wonder if they actually properly calculate the sizes or if instead they just put a bunch of a pictures in such an order that it looks right when making these?
This is a very professional video, I [w]onder [h]ow you would mak[e]this u[n]believable [number] video in your spare time? Also I like the [facts] and comparisons in this [video].
618 Ton(s) of dice, has it's own gravitational pull from which no string of bad luck may escape. Never thought I'd see a dice:universe size comparison video.
i need to sleep but i also needs answers
y=u×122
U= 52! What is y
This is proof that all humans are the same
@@dddivievery number is the same distance from infinity
@@phrimphrao54 52 factorial or just 52?
SAME
if you create a regular sized dice that contains a googol numbers, it'll be a sphere with sides so small it breaks the law of physics (probably, I haven't tried)
It actually would break physics, the faces would be smaller than the Planck length, where physics break down.
The observable universe doesn't have a googol atoms
Just make the dice really big
@@ericgolightly8450 that's just a sphere honestly
@@KirikkSiSqdidn’t say it did
Watching a humongonongologongous dice in space with dramatic epic music at 4am without any sleep is making me struggle to not laugh. 🤣
Full of much humongousness.🤪
I honestly lost it when it got to the local group. Like it's so insanely incomprehensibly large I just burst out laughing
There's a actually such number.Googol is a really small number,it's just first from the googol numbers.@@hansignals9593
You laugh you win a googol dice.
How bro felt like after saying Humongonongologongous: 😈😈🧠🗣️🗣️💯💯💯😈😈😈🧐🧐🧐
Minecraft steve could probably carry a stack of inventory of that thing
He could carry a full inventory of shulkers full to the brim of stacks of these.
@@MDE_never_dieshe could carry a whole inventory of shulker filled with shulkers filled with shulkers filled with shulkers filled with these dice
Honestly it's not too far off although this is still far greater.
@@astragaming6947 you can't put a shulker inside a shulker
@@Nufetto exactly
I was gonna ask what a Googol-Sided dice would look like. Then realized that's called a sphere.
YOU CRAZY
YOU ERROR NAME
A googolhedron!
If I rolled all those dice, the odds of those dice landing on the same number is still greater than:
•plugging in the USB correctly first try
•having a test without double sided papers
•finding happiness in life
And all of them combined?
Man how I relate to that last part lmfao😂😭😔
@@MrMedia2024Offical OH MY GOD WHY DO PEOPLE DO THE MATH FOR THIS-
@@MrMedia2024Offical i dont think itll be close to a googolplex
@@MrMedia2024Offical Ok its actually 10^600
I love how when numbers get too big it just turns into months
Huge shoutout to the factory workers who had to make all those dice!
"dices"
Props to everyone for helping to stack all those dice
They used math
AND NO, DO *_NOT_* HARASS ME FOR NOT UNDERSTANDING WHAT A JOKE IS
@@carythestickmanimagine if they did stack the dice :0
and they would have to be really rich to afford all the dice
@@carythestickmanr/woooosh
my arms are tired
Lesson: Never underestimate large numbers.
log()s
@@ErdemtugsC 💀
Googol plex... (Googol×Googol)
@@yuanfurbax no it’s googol^10
@@ErdemtugsC oh ok. Good to know
Graham's number:
Hold my beer.
I knew it was going to be a huge chunk but I'd never imagine it'd be much bigger than the observable universe. The magnificence of greater numbers are insane.
2:07 By this point, if that amount of dice were just floating next to each other in the middle of space somewhere, gravity would have rounded them into a planet
i dont think so. i dont think dice are dense enough. it would be more like one of those asteroids that are actually just a giant ball of dust floating in space.
actually it would happen at the previous stage
@@the_Acaman i know you weren't replying to me but just so you know dice would not form a planet. planets form when particles and materials are attracted to young stars via gravity. overtime the particles accumulate to form planets. dice would not have anywhere near enough gravity to form a planet, and their small size and shape would not facilitate the accretion process required for planet formation.
@@yournotgully not how gravity works. that is how a planet forms, but that ain't how gravity works.
@@freerobux49 be more specific, what part of what i wrote do you think is wrong?
Now this is cosmic horror.
Horror of simple mathematic.
This isn't Cosmic Horror, it's existentialism. Cosmic Horror is the horror of the vast and Infinite unknown, not gigantic die.
If you rolled each dice, the probability that they all land on a six is still higher than the probability that you would get a girlfriend
If you travelled by the zettaverse, the probability of finding our universe and inside our universe find earth and in earth find your house, is still higher than yall finding your lost pegh-
(joke)
The burning question is if that were a Rubik's cube how long would it take to solve it?
Your life x1000000000000000000000
Simple: one googol life. See ya!
that one asian kid in your class will do it in 20 seconds
@@rubub8455 nowadays this is considered racism. You should not use these lines...
@@pwr4 What does this have to do?
I’ve been watching for 4 years & you never fail to make good videos. Thanks Yenji!
Giant sun 🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌻🌞🌻🌞🌻🌞🌻🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞 8
@@nicholaslionel6471what are you talking about?
4 years?! You know you can change the playback speed to "normal", right?
Ohhh dude you just have the video loop on
^^ yall are too clever XD
At first I was a lil disappointed that it wasn't a die with a googol faces but now blown away with big it quickly got lmao!
that would be a ball wouldnt it
@@wafrong Pretty much lol
When counting the volume of a cube, the amount of units also raises to the 3rd power:
🎲 size: 16 mm
🎲 volume: 16³ mm³ = 4096 mm³
Same with "37 quad. cubic light years", which should also be raised to 3rd power.
Isn't IT already raised to the 3rd power? It said cubic light years after all
@@Bober26681 The unit is cubed, but the number is not.
37 quadrillion light years - that's the side length of a cube made of 10^100 🎲. (16 mm x cube root of 10^100).
The volume should be 4.84 x 10^46 cubic light years.
Should have more faces, not an exact cubic shape
I Could Imagine The Pain Of All Those Dice Falling The Person Who Made It Would Be Devestated
Fun fact: The opposite sides of a dice would always add up to 7
*6
@@michaeldreemurrandhisaus2165 actually it’s 7. Since there is a 6 the other side would have to be at least 1.
Fun fact: The opposite sides of the googolplex dice would always add up to googolplex+
I don’t understand
viva el 7
When you realize getting more dice just makes the outside appearance infinity flatter
0:55 When American use metric system.
At left, you have 4 cube of 1 cubic meter, so it makes 4 cubic meters
At the center, you also have 4 cubic meter, not 1.6 cubic meter.
Because a cube with a side of 1.6 meters is 1.6*1.6*1.6=4 cubic meters.
This video creates a scale in our minds and makes incomprehensible numbers comprehensible.😊
I guarantee you have no comprehension of even the size of our solar system lol. It is crazy to put numbers in perspective like this though.
now we need a googolplex dice
Here’s what happens
The computer turns into a nuke
Are you crazy 💀☠️
@@robloxrules4524 Nuclear detonation imminent
impossible
Have you heard about Ungoogol
Now for a googolplex dice! What we have just seen would be tiny in comparison! Thank you for sharing an interesting video!
If 10^100 is larger than the observable universe, then 10^(10^100) is unfathomable.
@@jazzabighits4473 not just larger TRILLIONS of times larger
@@Mohdaman13googol times larger
Yes
for my calculations it'd probably just be 3.7x10^16ly to the power of 3.7x10^16ly which is probably about a number with quadrillions or quintillions of zeroes
Imagine, they have all been lined up properly. All of the dice facing the same way, except one.
Props to the cameraman for filming this!
(And the guys who stacked all those dices)
It's always a good day when Yenji Jem (the folding paper guy) uploads
Yes! Agreed, I love his videos. I’ve been watching him for 4 years. He never fails to make good videos. Thanks Yenji!
Props to everyone who stacked all these dice.
@@OH-STUNNERNobody did.
@@MatthewConnellan-xc3oj If you count god as nobody then you are right
@@MatthewConnellan-xc3oj it's literally a joke
'This is a die' 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 (0:08)
Die is = to dice
I said the same thing too
@@agustyastarguy7942me too lol
youngpeopleyoutube
It’s not that funny
The dice would most likely collapse and break under the weight of other dice, so there probably wouldn't be a beautiful googol dice cube
I am going to cry and have a mental break down from this, I feel EVERY EMOTION that human beings have ever felt wrapped into one!!! I want to cry tears of ecstasy, horror, victory, defeat, anger, and sadness all AT ONCE. The sizes of these volumes make me have ALL of these emotions for so many different reasons.
Credits to whoever had to manufacture a googol dice for this video!
props to the guy who stacked them all
its cool when you make a awesome video about a random object
So useful. Thank you for finally giving us the answer. I can die, now.
Or if you were counting the numbers that the dice would have, you can get a extremelly high poly sphere and make it big. Then place the numbers in each polygon. Boom, you made a googol dice that you can actually use, you just need an extremelly powerful pc
Just pick a random number between 10¹⁰⁰ and 6×10¹⁰⁰
Saved your PC for you
@@Unofficial2048tiles oh good, more incomprehensible math
@@Unofficial2048tiles not uniformly random, but the idea is right
Establish
jarty
okay, so it'd just be a sphere yeah? The sides would be of such miniscule size that they'd like be indistinguishable from one another except underneath micro-lenses. More still, the color of the damn thing would probably be gray, or at least some manner of off white.
Edit: Referring to a googol-sided die
the sides would be so small that they would basically break physics
Good visualization! I can't even imagine the horror of what Graham's Number of dice would look like in the same way.
Or even the number of zeroes in it. (for comparison, Googol has 100 of zeroes, they can be represented by 5x5x4 dice, but Graham's Number is totally different)
How about Tree(3) amount of dice?
@@GunZnRifles Yes, that would be the next level probably ) But right now, how can it even begin to be calculated?
In comparison, Graham's Number is calculatable, you just need enough memory to store its digits or at least its order, i.e. number of digits in it, or at least the number of digits in its order, ot at least the number of, lets say, digits in the height of its power tower, and so on. And its calculation can be done in steps, where every next step requires exponentially more memory (in fact this amount grows much more quickly than exponentially) to store the result, so it is possible to stop at some point and begin to have an idea about the requirement for the next 1 or 2 steps, or at least something to metaphorically compare the result in the next step to.
The Three(3) by comparison is not yet calculatable at all.
I think it can only be reached by using power tower recursion. Even taking the log base googol wouldn’t do sh#t.
How about a googolplexian@@michaellv426
Now It's Time For a Graham's Number Dice.
At this point this much dice would have it's own gravitational pull.
It's now a black hole
everything has its own gravitational pull.
@@yournotgully gravitational pull that's noticeable to people
respects to cameraman for going this far
Props to the person who bought and stacked the Dice
I never knew a googol amount of die combined is bigger than a theoretical multiverse. Thank you
ive always known it but its cool to show how a duotrigintillion is VERY close to a googol (10x smaller)
10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Dugtriogintillion
That's an interesting thing to have always known
That isn't close at all. The difference between them is still 9 duotrigintillions. That's a huge gap!
Dice it wouldn't be the size of the universe Googleplex of dice probably who Volume of r earth give or take a quarter lol
2:58 the way how the 10⁶⁹ just pops up from nowhere
It was there all along 😢
The cool thing about factorials is that X^93 seems CLOSE to X^100, when in reality it is so so so much smaller.
Yep it's decieving. +1 in the exponent is ×10 in reality, +2 = ×100, +3 = ×1000
X^100 is 10 million times larger than X^93
I thought the question was what would a D-Googol would look like. Lol
I always thought that a island full of plastic would be bad for the ocean, but something tells me that a googol dice would probably not fit in the oceans. (Edit: wait 100 likes in 3 weeks ayyyoooooo)
Correct.
Yes I think there might be slightly too many
The gravitational field strength is stronger than the gravitational field strength of earth so it will pull the earth into it and become a black hole
@@noiceooooo4731 the mass energy would be more than the universe probably lol
@@jazzabighits4473 many times more, like putting that thing anywhere near the observable universe would not be good for us
Look's cool! I might do this but with Pokemon.
BTW Did you see my request from the Every number is interesting video?
Huh
The teacher was right, when you master mathematics you can create a lot of content from it
cant imagine feeling smaller than an incomprehensible amount of stacked dice
1:18 avg minecraft block
That would be 1 meter
this just proves how rediculously big 1 googol is
I really did not know numbers was this big thank you for teaching me!
This calculation defied my mind, i cant calculate that fast, yet there is answers to it
imagine if someone knocked that cube over….
*giant person appears to do so*
*There is no more universe. Only dice.*
of faqk
3:03 nice
Yes
@@moneyman4555no
S L A M O
@@ShoddySleet74 last words from jtard:
The reason engineering notation is used is to quantify then manipulate extremely large or small quantities.
If you did this same thing in reverse from the base unit, even the best theoretical physicists can't quantify or observe the fabric of matter that makes up all of existence
At 0:12 I think you mean the average die is 16x16x16 mm, which is 4096 mm3. A 16 mm3 die would have 2,5 mm sides, which would be hard to use.
With 16 mm sides you would indeed get about 63 in a meter.
Now, the biggest question...
If we rolled them all, how much would we get?
i think about 4.83 x 10^271
or 4.37 x 10^248
0 probably we cant count that much
@@mr.beatboxer757 bruh how the hell woud it be 0 my guy
@@loganross2677 i suck at math :P
This is so cool!
I thought the video was going to be about a googol-sided dice 😅
Yes! Finally! The answer to question everybody was asking themselves everyday!
1:50 bro humans would lag if that collapsed
The Matrix ain't matrixing
true tbh@@ShoddySleet74
Today is June 10th, which means:
Happy birthday, Yenji Jem!
this is honestly 1 of the most intresting videos ive ever seen, good job
also i thought it was gonna be a dice with a googol sides
Milky Way when the freaking duovigintillion dice walks in
The maxium we could throw with those dices is like 6x10*106,
am i right?
I suppose if you’re summing them, it would be 6 googol, or 60 duotrigintillion.
@@YenjiJem o
@@YenjiJemand it’s 1/6 googol chance it lands on the same number
@@theresa.y5221You'll need outrageous luck to roll a 60 duotrigintillion
No just 6x10^100
3969 dice more like 3969 nice
6969
@@YenjiJem nice
I'm no diceologist, but I imagine that might be a little tough to construct using available materials.
I was expecting it to end with a "your mama" joke
Happy birthday, Yenji Jem! :)
When god wants to play a board game
He can’t keep getting away with this! *increases exponentially in size once more*
"Aw shucks looks like i got 58 Septillion."
I was shocked seeing that we got to the observable universe without at 10^100
I could imagine some random number like 100000^100000000 and would be lost where it would go😂
That's Pentecillion
These numbers can get really big if you just keep adding 0's.
what would be the biggest number besides infinity
@@WolfbeTheGoof what's the smallest positive rational number?
0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000…
for perspective, if you took two different decks of playing cards and combined them then there would be more than a googol ways to shuffle the big deck
props to the people who had to make the dice
Yenji Jem finally made a beyond universe comparison, xD
3:45 OH NO
i love how he says "die"
Yeah one dice is a die
@@CornbreadFish that was 7 months ago
@@Plutodatgameris there a law against replying to old comments or did you just have a bad day?
Music is on point with this video
Thanks to the camera man who left the observable universe and the guy who bought and set up the dice
Multiplying by the highest number (6) is equivalent to:
6*10^100
Then (10^100)^6 is bigger.
A number past 2^1024 (2^^3).
It is equivalent to:
1*10^600
It will be:
1 Novemnonagintacentillion
Pretty sure 2 tetrated to 3 is 2^2^2 or 16
There is one question:
What will a centillion dice look like?
The Cube Would Be More Than 169.12 Sexvigintillion Cubic Light Years In Volume (Less Than A Googol Meters Containing 100 Duotrigintillion Dice On Each Side…), Which Would Be More Than 6 Unseptuagintillion Times Bigger Than The Known Observable Universe / About 46 Tresexagintillion Times Larger Than The Complete “Cosmic Inflation” Universe… (All Of The Stacked Dice Would Be Less Than 345 Paper Folds In Length, Which Is Why 5.25 < 7.58, Or The Estimated Amount Of Duotrigintillion Meters For Each Of Them…)
1.00Cn (1.00 centillion)
179UCn (179 uncentillion / 1024-bit integer limit)
NO THNK YOU.
I heard that only about halfway through this list, it already exceeds the number of atoms in the known universe, making the rest of the list truly theoretical numbers.
Obviously, we all needed this useful information and looked it up. It’s not like we found it on our recommended page and kept wondering.😅
Just a one touch and....
but what happens if i just remove a dice from the base and it starts raining dices?
it’s raining dices from out of the sky 💀 dices no need to ask why 💀💀☠️☠️💀💀☠️☠️
@@WolfbeTheGoof Just open your mouth and close your eyes its raining dices
@@anarcho_Anarchist open your mouth, its raining dices
@@thanhtamnguyenthi7073it's raining dices, out in the street
dices, all you can eat
@@ShoddySleet74lettuce and chows, cheese and meat, its raining tacos yum yum yum yum yummity yum
i lost my mind when it hit the observable universe i couldn't stop laughing
You guys ever wonder if they actually properly calculate the sizes or if instead they just put a bunch of a pictures in such an order that it looks right when making these?
Who thought he meant a dice with a googol sides
Me
Me also, I was disappointed but stunned in shock.
This is a very professional video, I [w]onder [h]ow you would mak[e]this u[n]believable [number] video in your spare time? Also I like the [facts] and comparisons in this [video].
when number facts video?
The dramatic music on a dice size comparison video made me laugh
618 Ton(s) of dice, has it's own gravitational pull from which no string of bad luck may escape. Never thought I'd see a dice:universe size comparison video.
What about a googolplex dice?
1:40 i always made fun on the number
💀💀💀☠️💀☠️
69 sextillion
Hard to believe that's a real name for a number (69,000,000,000,000,000,000,000)
that's true, i saw a lot cubes made of dice all around the universe
This is the information i need to save a loved one in the future, very helpfull.