Whew! This video is a tall cold glass of ice water on a sweltering day! My knee-jerk reaction when I see the word "Galatians" is to quickly scroll by, but my subconscious nudged me to pay attention. "Critical", it kept reassuring me. I took grew up in church going to David Lipscomb from k-12 so I was thoroughly saturated in Saul's writings. Then in 2000, I read my Bible cover-to-cover. Then again. Then again. After the 3rd time the inconsistencies started to be a problem. By 2005 I had completely rejected Saul. Funny things happen when you reject Saul. Family and friends disappear. It's been 10 years since I've had contact with my mother. BUT, I still have Yeshua and Torah! You are so gracious about this subject. Looking forward to hearing part 2! Thank you for your bravery. Shalom
Studied Revelation and the prophets and my eyes were opened by HaShem to keep Sabbath Saturday and from there the truth started opening up to me! Baruch HaShem 🙌
Glad you mentioned 2 Peter 3:14-17. There are 2 theories behind that. One is it was added in to backup Paul and the second is Peter was being sarcastic which is what I think after studying the Homilies. Just like Hebrews was most likely written by Barnabas not Paul. James is a rebuttal to Galations almost word for word.
That's why Peter warned about Paul's writings in 2Peter 3:16 to wit: He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
Yes I have read Peter's writings. I also realize Paul was a great Torah scholar. I also realize he was not our Messiah and one sided letters are difficult to follow. I thank you for your comment
I bought Lancaster's book many years ago, and only a handful of years into keeping Torah and faith of Yeshua outside of Christianity. The cognitive dissonance was so huge trying to figure out and rationalize Galatians, etc that I had to put it down. I give Paul the bebefit of the doubt though and absolutely will not throw him under the bus as you say and judge him negatively because I just don't know all the facts of what is really going on there. I know what the Torah and Yeshua says and just do that, even if it appears to contradict some of what Paul says.
His letters aren’t scripture. In any and every place where he appears to teach against the following of Torah we must, according to the plain teaching of the Bible, reject him. Otherwise, glean.
Except that he never went against Torah. He only said if you're Jewish stay Jewish (but follow the Messiah), and if you're a gentile, stay one and still follow the Messiah. Neither did Yeshua thought that gentile should become Jews. Having said that, Martin Luther did more damage than Paul.
I was a Mormon for several years and when I started hearing your description of Paul I was completely hit with the similarity between Paul and Joseph Smith. Deut 17 says two to three witnesses. I see that apply to the words of the prophets as much as a court proceeding. Mormons deny its applicability to Joseph Smith. I suspect Christians would deny its applicability to Paul.
I’m new to your channel and I love your content. I have a question since your not a Christian, how can we trust The Bible since the canon was their invention, which serves Church law. Shalom and May Yehovah Bless you.
Welcome to Lapid and thank you for watching. The establishment of the actual scriptures, the Tanak was not the work of the church but that of the Men of the Great Assembly- Jews - many of him are mentioned in the Bible such as Ezra, Nehemiah, Obediah, Haggai, Malachi, Zerrubabbel, Mordecai and others. It has been universally accepted by Jews for many centuries before the church. The church canonised Paul’s writings as their bible which we categorically reject. Hope that helps.
@@LapidJudaism Thank you, what about some apocryphal books? I’ve done some research and before the Catholics decided to play around with the scriptures, some other books were considered scripture and A few church Fathers commented on that.
Yes Rabbi at the end of the day they're all Catholic and the church fathers didn't really do us any favors really great study it's a just the plain truth Barruch Hashem 🔯
The Seventh Day Adventist church is a tricky christian denomination... They follow the law about clean and unclean foods yet uphold the teachings of Paul... I used to be a SDA but my eyes are now wide open about the lies circulating christianity. I left SDA on 2017. As you mentioned, the writings of Ellen g white is like a part of the Scriptures to them. They claim that the bible is the greater light while White's teachings are the lesser light. But from what I've witnessed inside this church, I beg to differ. Often times, they quote a lot from her teachings then back it up with the scriptures. There's even some sort of teachings that there are many worlds and in those worlds there are many Adam and Eve. The heck... The deal breaker for me was when I questioned the pastors asking them why we do not celebrate the biblical feast days and why are we taking part in christmas, valentines etc, instead. The answer that they gave me was: "we need to join them in order to gain them and besides those feast days were already nailed to the cross when the veil in the temple got ripped when JC died on the cross." Instead of standing your ground, you bend over to their belief so that you can gain their trust...? That explanation just doesn't sit right with me. From my understanding, keeping the law means keeping the feast days as well. I think this christian denomination is the most deceiving among any other denomination... They follow the law but they are mixed with lies. They boast that they are sabbath keepers and do not eat unclean foods, they even say that they are 'spiritual Israel'. For some reason, I just really cannot accept that spiritual Israel teaching. Many people from different christian denominations think that they are now on the right path when they join SDA since it's very 'unique' from other protestants/baptists etc. in a sense that they 'keep the commandments'. However from my perception, this is what I can see: From catholic to baptist/protestant to SDA. They are just going around in circles. They are still inside this christian system. They are just repeatedly falling for the same lie of ha satan. But thankfully יהוה took me out from this denomination... My cousins are SDA, my father is a catholic. I only have יהוה/ישוע with me since all of my relatives thinks that I am a heretic because I proudly declare that I am not a christian. But יהוה/ישוע is more than enough. Living in a catholic/christian country(Philippines), proudly declaring that you are not a christian means you are a satanist/demon-possessed person. But somehow, with יהוה beside me, I learned to stand my ground and not bend over to traditions of men. I hold on to this verse: כִּי אָבִי וְאִמִּי עֲזָבוּנִי וַיהוָה יַאַסְפֵנִי Also since I left christianity, I don't know but it's as if there's a force that is urging me to learn the Hebrew language. Right now I can read and write Hebrew letters and know a few biblical Hebrew words. I also downloaded a Hebrew bible. The Scriptures makes a lot of sense in it's own original language. Undoubtedly, Hebrew is the לָשׁוֹן הַקֹּדֶשׁ. I was so delighted when I saw your channel. Lots of insights from a real Jewish rabbi who believes in Yeshua.
Baruch HaShem. Let common sense, logic, the scriptures and HaShem guide you. Remember that ANY “gospel” that nullifies ANY commandment is, by biblical definition, a false gospel.
Well that was very good I personally read Paul Epistles 100 times I thought the reason that he was so a little Helter skelter was because he was dealing always with the pagan gentiles who became Christians those people went back and forth religion holidays and then kept God's holidays also it's like they kept Paul always upset... And if you our brothers with sinful people it will affect you emotionally and spiritually and I could always tell Paul talked like he was stressed out dealing with the pagans
It's a mess. I say that because Lancaster presents the truth of what Paul is saying and yet he does not seem to grasp the absolute heresy in it. Rather he seems to accept it. Crazy.
@@LapidJudaism The first thing that struck me as weird was in the Introduction. He said, "Paul's seemingly anti-Jewish or anti-Law rhetoric needs to be understood as internal dialogue within Yeshua-believing Judaism of his day." The problem with that is that Paul was the only one talking about it. The only "internal dialogue" was with himself (see Romans 7:15-25).
Agreed. The author goes on to say - many times - that Paul’s gospel was his and his alone. Different than the 12. He writes it as if it is somehow kosher. That’s just crazy.
Can say something (i believe) In Paul's time, there was a variety of religious beliefs (diversified) with all cast creed races with the godly beliefs. Their life style traveling import and export business are less compared to today's World, with Romans being similar to Western culture today. Later, Islam came into the picture, but the Gospel and the apostles started their mission in Jerusalem. The orthodox Jews were not believers in the new covenant. If someone were assigned to preach the Gospel to a pagan world, with the gifts of healing and writing letters, the main focus should be on teaching the salvation part that they had never heard of before. Paul also spoke of the future Kingdom in his letters, which he was guided by the Ruach in researching. All the apostles and even Paul witnessed the crucifixion of Y'Shua. Even though Paul was not an apostle, he was gifted at being a literate in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. At that time, the believers in Y'shua and Father YHWH were mostly gentiles, much like today's believers. As time passed, there was an eruption of adopting newsletters of Paul and apostles for the gentiles, which caused great confusion. The Romans forgot about the true name of Y'shua. In this world, only two religions adopted the Bible: Christians and Islam. Buddhism and Hinduism have their own teachings, with some sources matching those of Persia, Iran, and Egypt. The Roman Greeks had their own mythology, and their scholars believed in their own way, which was a mixture of junk. Today, we understand precisely what Paul was saying about the laws, which are true and agreed upon by all the apostles, especially Peter, the rock foundation of the house built. From the Old to the New Testament, both Roman Catholics and Protestants we are the only original have surpassed the core depths in research of what exactly doing today (by keeping the laws and believing in Messiach) the toughest time we do have more than any religious beliefs!
Uh no. Your wrote that all the apostles agreed with Paul especially Peter. That is simply not accurate at all. He was teaching a completely different “gospel”. Moreover you wrote that he was right about the laws and we all agree with him. No not at all. He was absolutely wrong 100% according to the Bible and we certainly do not agree with him, God forbid.
@@LapidJudaism oh ok! I need to read again been a while! And also Paul' is Pharase and he knows the difference of old and new covenant! While he was living he did followed the law attending the fest and Shabbat and working and preaching! He never knew Sunday was holy pagan day in his times and also all the apostals and even Paul never knew that Y'SHUA AND FATHER YHWH named will be called wrongly (pagan) in different languages!
I haven’t listen to the whole thing yet I’m halfway through but I don’t think that you have to reject Paul. I think you have to reject Christianity’s interpretation of Paul. I believe Christianity has missed interpreted Paul like Peter warned.
That is a very common thought but I have come to realize - in my evolution of understanding Paul - that it isn't true. Paul wrote what he wrote and he meant it. Btw, 2 Peter is well known to be a forgery. Even the wicked church fathers knew it and wrote about it. So it is not reliable to say the least. Not to mention the fact that the Greek there has been COMPLETELY mistranslated. Christianity exists precisely because of Paul's thoughts and letters. Watch the entire series on Galatians. It's important. There is a mental conditioning that makes people not want to "get rid of" Paul. Why? Because subconsciously he IS the faith. That is a the problem.
Sending you some pages from a book explaining Paul's writings. He was against the Rabbi's manmade laws, ie, Oral Torah. Against the circumcision of the Rabbis, making their converts blood their salvation. The book shows Sarah's words about Leah's son as a forshadow ( her son shall not be heirs with my son) of the Rabbinical proselytizing sons.
Was going to watch this..but I emailed you earlier, and I think maybe I was wrong in thinking you were the "Aaron to my Moses"..I cant picture you speaking with authority to the world from the Temple Mount, just stay "safe" where you are, criticizing with your Solomonish wisdom, and I will follow the Spirit to achieve the Will of the Creator of the Universe..and yes, that includes Paul..and Satan..and anything and everything else you can think of..if you change your mind, and choose to help Israel firsthand.. message me back..🎉
There quite literally are variations in the Dead Sea Scrolls. And that is besides the point anyways because they are written hundreds of years after the originals. Pure Ideology. Ye discerneth not after the Spirit@@LapidJudaism
@ExpiditionWild Ye not knoweth what thy speaketh. Please stop with the old English silliness. Seriously. Anyway, no there are not “discrepancies” in the Dead Sea scrolls. That is, in fact, one of the great marvels. As far as the Torah….yeah it’s 4,000 years old. So I am not concerned. We have enough verification. Knoweth Ye thus.
Lots of truth with some conflating of facts by omission. Historically it's true, that catholicism was enforced by fear, but considering that harlots were stoned to death, that Jesus was turned over to Rome to instill fear in anyone who would dare challenge the Sanhedrin, and many other disturbing examples, Judaism was also a religion promoted by fear.
1 also Jews consider gentiles to follow just "noahide" laws. 2. Jews made Talmud 400y after NewCovenant ( NT. book written by Jews in Israel ) B its in contradiction with the Tanakh as everything circled around the temple service and it got destroyed. 3 So called "Christians" were at the start Jews/Israelites like Paul(Saul) that was from the tribe of Benjamin. 4. It was "Family issue" at the start they went to Synagogue to discuss and some people believed some didn't ( topic: Yeshua is Messiah )
1. The Noahide thing is a myth. Not valid. I just finished a book on that topic which will be released soon. 2. The Talmud was compiled (key word) from the late first to the 4th century. Compiled….meaning the Oral law was written. It was not “created” At that time. Obviously you know very little about it. I have the entire set. Do you? Have you even read one daf? Do you know what a daf is? 3. Paul was a heretic who taught his own gospel (by his own admission). He forsook his Judaism and create a fake religion and a fake messiah. 4. The “family issue” is laughable nonsense.
Paul was a liar, a false “apostle” and he created a false religion. Christianity is NOT based upon the bible but on the words of a man. That’s the reality. You have a choice: follow the God of Israel or a man. We choose HaShem.
Lol. I (we) will never join that false religion. And we will continue to reach Christian’s to encourage them to abandon their false Messiah. Be well. Praying for your salvation.
@@LapidJudaism thanks for your understanding. Israelites still remain God's chosen people, through them, the world has know the true God. The problem is the veil about the true messiah.(Jesus christ).
Their is no veil. The problem is that your false Messiah, JC, abolished the Torah which - according to Deuteronomy 13 - makes him a false prophet. This is why Jews reject him. You are right, we Jews are still the chosen and we always will be to the exclusion of xtians. But one day you will join us and bend your knee to the true Messiah. One day you will walk in the Torah (Isaiah 2:3; Zechariah 14).
nothing more than a lashon hara hate rant. how disappointing to hear this blind ignorance, and how confident and closed minded you are to anything you disagree with. what a shame.
Dr. Berrie Wilson and Dr. James Tabor, as well as many other scholars disagree with you. You should do some reading of their works. They have 30-40 years of experience in this field.
This is a good read. I know that Christian typically struggle with accepting facts especially when they tend to slaughter sacred cows - or in this case, idols - but facts are stubborn things. The best policy is to embrace them and apply them. In this article, what I have said here is backed up with, well, facts. rabbigriffin.blog/2023/05/31/saul-of-tarsus/
@15:20 Fifteen minutes in, and the epistle to the Galatians has not been opened once. Nearly half-done with the video, and the topic has hardly even been addressed. Rather, there is preparatory work and polemics garnered, instead of simply addressing the topic of your video. This seems to be a consistent theme with your videos. Do you still love Christians when you relay it as an insult in your comments against them, demonize them with polemics, and breathe out the word like a curse word? Not in this video, but in your comments in other videos. I understand you believe you are "loving the sinner, but hating the sin", but I do not see love from your actions. Not just in this video, but many others. May Adonai give you wisdom, and may He be a light unto your path. Edit: After watching the full video, I see that the text wasn't even opened once. The entire video was preparatory polemics.
Have you ever heard the phrase "hate the sin love the sinner?" Have you ever used it. Can one hate false religion s but care for those trapped in it? Or, in your world, does hating a cult mean that you hate those who believe it and are in bondage? You know, you have come on this channel and made so many self-righteous comments. You throw around accusations and then when you get hit back you melt like a snowflake and cry about the way in which "you have been treated". Smh. You say that we don't provide any proofs and yet you have NEVER cited a single verse to support your guy Paul! No. One. Single>Verse.....EVER. Please son, we are not impressed.
Cristianity would not exist without missunderstanding Shaul...to begin with, the letter to the Galatians was not written to christians but to the congregation formed by jews and gentiles toghther who had a controversy about circumcision. Cristianity didn´t exist yet .
Whew! This video is a tall cold glass of ice water on a sweltering day! My knee-jerk reaction when I see the word "Galatians" is to quickly scroll by, but my subconscious nudged me to pay attention. "Critical", it kept reassuring me.
I took grew up in church going to David Lipscomb from k-12 so I was thoroughly saturated in Saul's writings. Then in 2000, I read my Bible cover-to-cover. Then again. Then again. After the 3rd time the inconsistencies started to be a problem. By 2005 I had completely rejected Saul. Funny things happen when you reject Saul. Family and friends disappear. It's been 10 years since I've had contact with my mother. BUT, I still have Yeshua and Torah!
You are so gracious about this subject. Looking forward to hearing part 2! Thank you for your bravery.
Shalom
Toda Rabbah for watching and commenting! Your words are so appreciated. Welcome home to Lapid!
Studied Revelation and the prophets and my eyes were opened by HaShem to keep Sabbath Saturday and from there the truth started opening up to me! Baruch HaShem 🙌
Amen.
Glad you mentioned 2 Peter 3:14-17. There are 2 theories behind that. One is it was added in to backup Paul and the second is Peter was being sarcastic which is what I think after studying the Homilies. Just like Hebrews was most likely written by Barnabas not Paul. James is a rebuttal to Galations almost word for word.
Agreed about James.
I am looking forward to this study because I have questions. Thank you.
I pray that it helps answer your questions.
Paul's writings were where I found the most confusion. They were conflicting to the rest of the gospels.
That's why Peter warned about Paul's writings in 2Peter 3:16 to wit:
He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
Yes I have read Peter's writings. I also realize Paul was a great Torah scholar. I also realize he was not our Messiah and one sided letters are difficult to follow. I thank you for your comment
Where can we find Hebrew manuscripts?
Love it Rabbi. Can't wait for Part 2. Baruch Hashem. Christianity the blinding of the nations.
I bought Lancaster's book many years ago, and only a handful of years into keeping Torah and faith of Yeshua outside of Christianity. The cognitive dissonance was so huge trying to figure out and rationalize Galatians, etc that I had to put it down. I give Paul the bebefit of the doubt though and absolutely will not throw him under the bus as you say and judge him negatively because I just don't know all the facts of what is really going on there. I know what the Torah and Yeshua says and just do that, even if it appears to contradict some of what Paul says.
Do we have to reject Paul's teaching or just view them for what his letters are?
His letters aren’t scripture. In any and every place where he appears to teach against the following of Torah we must, according to the plain teaching of the Bible, reject him. Otherwise, glean.
Except that he never went against Torah. He only said if you're Jewish stay Jewish (but follow the Messiah), and if you're a gentile, stay one and still follow the Messiah. Neither did Yeshua thought that gentile should become Jews. Having said that, Martin Luther did more damage than Paul.
I was a Mormon for several years and when I started hearing your description of Paul I was completely hit with the similarity between Paul and Joseph Smith. Deut 17 says two to three witnesses. I see that apply to the words of the prophets as much as a court proceeding. Mormons deny its applicability to Joseph Smith. I suspect Christians would deny its applicability to Paul.
I’m new to your channel and I love your content. I have a question since your not a Christian, how can we trust The Bible since the canon was their invention, which serves Church law. Shalom and May Yehovah Bless you.
Welcome to Lapid and thank you for watching. The establishment of the actual scriptures, the Tanak was not the work of the church but that of the Men of the Great Assembly- Jews - many of him are mentioned in the Bible such as Ezra, Nehemiah, Obediah, Haggai, Malachi, Zerrubabbel, Mordecai and others. It has been universally accepted by Jews for many centuries before the church.
The church canonised Paul’s writings as their bible which we categorically reject. Hope that helps.
@@LapidJudaism Thank you, what about some apocryphal books? I’ve done some research and before the Catholics decided to play around with the scriptures, some other books were considered scripture and A few church Fathers commented on that.
Yes Rabbi at the end of the day they're all Catholic and the church fathers didn't really do us any favors really great study it's a just the plain truth Barruch Hashem 🔯
The Seventh Day Adventist church is a tricky christian denomination...
They follow the law about clean and unclean foods yet uphold the teachings of Paul...
I used to be a SDA but my eyes are now wide open about the lies circulating christianity. I left SDA on 2017. As you mentioned, the writings of Ellen g white is like a part of the Scriptures to them. They claim that the bible is the greater light while White's teachings are the lesser light. But from what I've witnessed inside this church, I beg to differ. Often times, they quote a lot from her teachings then back it up with the scriptures. There's even some sort of teachings that there are many worlds and in those worlds there are many Adam and Eve. The heck...
The deal breaker for me was when I questioned the pastors asking them why we do not celebrate the biblical feast days and why are we taking part in christmas, valentines etc, instead. The answer that they gave me was: "we need to join them in order to gain them and besides those feast days were already nailed to the cross when the veil in the temple got ripped when JC died on the cross."
Instead of standing your ground, you bend over to their belief so that you can gain their trust...? That explanation just doesn't sit right with me. From my understanding, keeping the law means keeping the feast days as well.
I think this christian denomination is the most deceiving among any other denomination... They follow the law but they are mixed with lies. They boast that they are sabbath keepers and do not eat unclean foods, they even say that they are 'spiritual Israel'. For some reason, I just really cannot accept that spiritual Israel teaching. Many people from different christian denominations think that they are now on the right path when they join SDA since it's very 'unique' from other protestants/baptists etc. in a sense that they 'keep the commandments'. However from my perception, this is what I can see: From catholic to baptist/protestant to SDA. They are just going around in circles. They are still inside this christian system. They are just repeatedly falling for the same lie of ha satan.
But thankfully יהוה took me out from this denomination... My cousins are SDA, my father is a catholic. I only have יהוה/ישוע with me since all of my relatives thinks that I am a heretic because I proudly declare that I am not a christian. But יהוה/ישוע is more than enough.
Living in a catholic/christian country(Philippines), proudly declaring that you are not a christian means you are a satanist/demon-possessed person. But somehow, with יהוה beside me, I learned to stand my ground and not bend over to traditions of men.
I hold on to this verse:
כִּי אָבִי וְאִמִּי עֲזָבוּנִי וַיהוָה יַאַסְפֵנִי
Also since I left christianity, I don't know but it's as if there's a force that is urging me to learn the Hebrew language. Right now I can read and write Hebrew letters and know a few biblical Hebrew words. I also downloaded a Hebrew bible. The Scriptures makes a lot of sense in it's own original language. Undoubtedly, Hebrew is the לָשׁוֹן הַקֹּדֶשׁ.
I was so delighted when I saw your channel. Lots of insights from a real Jewish rabbi who believes in Yeshua.
Rev 2.2 tells us everything we need to know.
Great teaching, thank you🙋🏻♀️
I am listening And trying to think it out.
Baruch HaShem. Let common sense, logic, the scriptures and HaShem guide you. Remember that ANY “gospel” that nullifies ANY commandment is, by biblical definition, a false gospel.
Well that was very good I personally read Paul Epistles 100 times I thought the reason that he was so a little Helter skelter was because he was dealing always with the pagan gentiles who became Christians those people went back and forth religion holidays and then kept God's holidays also it's like they kept Paul always upset... And if you our brothers with sinful people it will affect you emotionally and spiritually and I could always tell Paul talked like he was stressed out dealing with the pagans
I do own a copy of Lancaster's book. I was kinda lost in the sauce with it. It would be interesting to look at again from Rabbi's point of view.
It's a mess. I say that because Lancaster presents the truth of what Paul is saying and yet he does not seem to grasp the absolute heresy in it. Rather he seems to accept it. Crazy.
@@LapidJudaism The first thing that struck me as weird was in the Introduction. He said, "Paul's seemingly anti-Jewish or anti-Law rhetoric needs to be understood as internal dialogue within Yeshua-believing Judaism of his day." The problem with that is that Paul was the only one talking about it. The only "internal dialogue" was with himself (see Romans 7:15-25).
Agreed. The author goes on to say - many times - that Paul’s gospel was his and his alone. Different than the 12. He writes it as if it is somehow kosher. That’s just crazy.
Very interesting indeed 😊
Interesting yet provocative...
Can say something (i believe)
In Paul's time, there was a variety of religious beliefs (diversified) with all cast creed races with the godly beliefs. Their life style traveling import and export business are less compared to today's World, with Romans being similar to Western culture today. Later, Islam came into the picture, but the Gospel and the apostles started their mission in Jerusalem. The orthodox Jews were not believers in the new covenant. If someone were assigned to preach the Gospel to a pagan world, with the gifts of healing and writing letters, the main focus should be on teaching the salvation part that they had never heard of before. Paul also spoke of the future Kingdom in his letters, which he was guided by the Ruach in researching. All the apostles and even Paul witnessed the crucifixion of Y'Shua. Even though Paul was not an apostle, he was gifted at being a literate in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. At that time, the believers in Y'shua and Father YHWH were mostly gentiles, much like today's believers. As time passed, there was an eruption of adopting newsletters of Paul and apostles for the gentiles, which caused great confusion. The Romans forgot about the true name of Y'shua. In this world, only two religions adopted the Bible: Christians and Islam. Buddhism and Hinduism have their own teachings, with some sources matching those of Persia, Iran, and Egypt. The Roman Greeks had their own mythology, and their scholars believed in their own way, which was a mixture of junk. Today, we understand precisely what Paul was saying about the laws, which are true and agreed upon by all the apostles, especially Peter, the rock foundation of the house built. From the Old to the New Testament, both Roman Catholics and Protestants we are the only original have surpassed the core depths in research of what exactly doing today (by keeping the laws and believing in Messiach) the toughest time we do have more than any religious beliefs!
Uh no. Your wrote that all the apostles agreed with Paul especially Peter. That is simply not accurate at all. He was teaching a completely different “gospel”. Moreover you wrote that he was right about the laws and we all agree with him. No not at all. He was absolutely wrong 100% according to the Bible and we certainly do not agree with him, God forbid.
@@LapidJudaism oh ok! I need to read again been a while! And also Paul' is Pharase and he knows the difference of old and new covenant! While he was living he did followed the law attending the fest and Shabbat and working and preaching! He never knew Sunday was holy pagan day in his times and also all the apostals and even Paul never knew that Y'SHUA AND FATHER YHWH named will be called wrongly (pagan) in different languages!
I haven’t listen to the whole thing yet I’m halfway through but I don’t think that you have to reject Paul. I think you have to reject Christianity’s interpretation of Paul. I believe Christianity has missed interpreted Paul like Peter warned.
That is a very common thought but I have come to realize - in my evolution of understanding Paul - that it isn't true. Paul wrote what he wrote and he meant it. Btw, 2 Peter is well known to be a forgery. Even the wicked church fathers knew it and wrote about it. So it is not reliable to say the least. Not to mention the fact that the Greek there has been COMPLETELY mistranslated.
Christianity exists precisely because of Paul's thoughts and letters. Watch the entire series on Galatians. It's important. There is a mental conditioning that makes people not want to "get rid of" Paul. Why? Because subconsciously he IS the faith. That is a the problem.
I’ll watch the whole series…
Sending you some pages from a book explaining Paul's writings. He was against the Rabbi's manmade laws, ie, Oral Torah. Against the circumcision of the Rabbis, making their converts blood their salvation.
The book shows Sarah's words about Leah's son as a forshadow ( her son shall not be heirs with my son) of the Rabbinical proselytizing sons.
The Oral Law is not man made Law. The entire premise is flawed.
I agree Paul teaches a dangerous gospel thats sends people to h3ll!😢
Toda Rabah Rabbi
2 Peter 3:16-18 I think
I thought this meant if one doesn't know the Torah, like the church one doesn't understand his letters. HELP!!!
Was going to watch this..but I emailed you earlier, and I think maybe I was wrong in thinking you were the "Aaron to my Moses"..I cant picture you speaking with authority to the world from the Temple Mount, just stay "safe" where you are, criticizing with your Solomonish wisdom, and I will follow the Spirit to achieve the Will of the Creator of the Universe..and yes, that includes Paul..and Satan..and anything and everything else you can think of..if you change your mind, and choose to help Israel firsthand.. message me back..🎉
There is a group called Apostolic that try to emulate the Apostles but instead actions are Catholic
You know we don't have any originals of any book in the Bible? Isn't that interesting?
We have the Dead Sea scrolls from 2,000 years ago. Absolutely no changes. Isn’t that interesting.
Not so for Paul’s letters. Over 500k variations.
There quite literally are variations in the Dead Sea Scrolls. And that is besides the point anyways because they are written hundreds of years after the originals. Pure Ideology. Ye discerneth not after the Spirit@@LapidJudaism
@ExpiditionWild Ye not knoweth what thy speaketh. Please stop with the old English silliness. Seriously.
Anyway, no there are not “discrepancies” in the Dead Sea scrolls. That is, in fact, one of the great marvels. As far as the Torah….yeah it’s 4,000 years old. So I am not concerned. We have enough verification. Knoweth Ye thus.
Pauls gospel tells it all
Is Paul a separatist? Keep Jews and Gentiles separated and not one under messiah?
Paul was just teaching a false gospel. One that brought division to be sure.
Please by and read “How Jesus became Christian” by Barrie Wilson, amazing insight into the topic
Doing so now. Thank you
Yes heard of Ellen G White... Mmnnn.... Run.... however the 7th Days have good knowledge of Revelation and Daniel.
Lots of truth with some conflating of facts by omission. Historically it's true, that catholicism was enforced by fear, but considering that harlots were stoned to death, that Jesus was turned over to Rome to instill fear in anyone who would dare challenge the Sanhedrin, and many other disturbing examples, Judaism was also a religion promoted by fear.
Scholars who have decades of experience in this specific discipline...disagree with you. See Dr. Berrie Wilson and Dr. James Tabor among others.
1 also Jews consider gentiles to follow just "noahide" laws.
2. Jews made Talmud 400y after NewCovenant ( NT. book written by Jews in Israel )
B its in contradiction with the Tanakh as everything circled around the temple service and it got destroyed.
3 So called "Christians" were at the start Jews/Israelites like Paul(Saul) that was from the tribe of Benjamin.
4. It was "Family issue" at the start they went to Synagogue to discuss and some people believed some didn't ( topic: Yeshua is Messiah )
1. The Noahide thing is a myth. Not valid. I just finished a book on that topic which will be released soon.
2. The Talmud was compiled (key word) from the late first to the 4th century. Compiled….meaning the Oral law was written. It was not “created”
At that time. Obviously you know very little about it. I have the entire set. Do you? Have you even read one daf? Do you know what a daf is?
3. Paul was a heretic who taught his own gospel (by his own admission). He forsook his Judaism and create a fake religion and a fake messiah.
4. The “family issue” is laughable nonsense.
Christians will never be uncomfortable but trust more in christ. Galatians is true and proves that apostle paul was right about Judaism.
Paul was a liar, a false “apostle” and he created a false religion. Christianity is NOT based upon the bible but on the words of a man. That’s the reality. You have a choice: follow the God of Israel or a man. We choose HaShem.
@@LapidJudaism. Don't believe in apostle Paul please. Let Christians be. Soon you will join Christianity.
Lol. I (we) will never join that false religion. And we will continue to reach Christian’s to encourage them to abandon their false Messiah. Be well. Praying for your salvation.
@@LapidJudaism thanks for your understanding. Israelites still remain God's chosen people, through them, the world has know the true God. The problem is the veil about the true messiah.(Jesus christ).
Their is no veil. The problem is that your false Messiah, JC, abolished the Torah which - according to Deuteronomy 13 - makes him a false prophet. This is why Jews reject him.
You are right, we Jews are still the chosen and we always will be to the exclusion of xtians. But one day you will join us and bend your knee to the true Messiah. One day you will walk in the Torah (Isaiah 2:3; Zechariah 14).
nothing more than a lashon hara hate rant. how disappointing to hear this blind ignorance, and how confident and closed minded you are to anything you disagree with. what a shame.
Dr. Berrie Wilson and Dr. James Tabor, as well as many other scholars disagree with you. You should do some reading of their works. They have 30-40 years of experience in this field.
This is a good read. I know that Christian typically struggle with accepting facts especially when they tend to slaughter sacred cows - or in this case, idols - but facts are stubborn things. The best policy is to embrace them and apply them. In this article, what I have said here is backed up with, well, facts.
rabbigriffin.blog/2023/05/31/saul-of-tarsus/
Facts!!! He is sooo close minded, it's pathetic
@15:20
Fifteen minutes in, and the epistle to the Galatians has not been opened once. Nearly half-done with the video, and the topic has hardly even been addressed. Rather, there is preparatory work and polemics garnered, instead of simply addressing the topic of your video.
This seems to be a consistent theme with your videos.
Do you still love Christians when you relay it as an insult in your comments against them, demonize them with polemics, and breathe out the word like a curse word? Not in this video, but in your comments in other videos.
I understand you believe you are "loving the sinner, but hating the sin", but I do not see love from your actions. Not just in this video, but many others.
May Adonai give you wisdom, and may He be a light unto your path.
Edit: After watching the full video, I see that the text wasn't even opened once. The entire video was preparatory polemics.
Have you ever heard the phrase "hate the sin love the sinner?" Have you ever used it. Can one hate false religion s but care for those trapped in it? Or, in your world, does hating a cult mean that you hate those who believe it and are in bondage? You know, you have come on this channel and made so many self-righteous comments. You throw around accusations and then when you get hit back you melt like a snowflake and cry about the way in which "you have been treated". Smh. You say that we don't provide any proofs and yet you have NEVER cited a single verse to support your guy Paul! No. One. Single>Verse.....EVER. Please son, we are not impressed.
@@LapidJudaism You used the phrase in the video, not me.
@@LapidJudaism I will also point out not a single scripture was brought up in this video. Not a single one.
Cristianity would not exist without missunderstanding Shaul...to begin with, the letter to the Galatians was not written to christians but to the congregation formed by jews and gentiles toghther who had a controversy about circumcision. Cristianity didn´t exist yet .