🌌💭 What's your take on the Information Paradox? Do you think black holes really can delete information or is it just transformed in a way we don't understand yet? Let's discuss below! 👇 And don't forget to like, subscribe, and ring the bell for more cosmic mysteries! 🔔
Thanks for watching the video! Great reactions as always. This is an older Kurzgesagt video, so they were a lot more lax on how they presented their information. 1:55 I'm assuming they're referring to a stellar black hole that doesn't have an accretion disk. Kurzgesagt's videos were made to be easy to digest, and are prone to be misinformed sometimes. 11:05 It doesn't really matter whether the stone is ripped apart, as long as we know exactly how, we can essentially reverse engineer it into the exact same stone, i.e. information isn't lost. I think the analogy here is: much like how we can tell something went inside the pond when the water level rises, we can tell when something went inside a black hole when the event horizon grows. The problem is that we have no way of retrieving that information. My take on this is that information is still indestructible, just unreachable. Like an encrypted hard drive. 14:22 I can definitely recommend their video on String Theory, it's a fun watch.
@decomposedcorpse5186 Haha, you've got a keen eye for spotting the lax presentation style of older Kurzgesagt videos! But hey, sometimes a little misinformed charm adds to the fun of spotting and correcting, right? Again, thank you for the great video recommendation! In regards to the stone thrown in the pond analogy,. Wouldn't, for example, taking a black-and-white low-res photo of the rock and then vaporizing it be closer to the analogy of what might actually be going on with the "information transfer"? I guess the ripples on the surface of the pond would carry even less information than a picture and be only temporary once the waves stop propagating on the surface. Whereas the rock still fully exists intact at the bottom of the pond. But in either case, to me, it would appear the original information is lost not to just us but to existence itself since any object entering a black hole is torn apart atom by atom, no? (the debate on it being unreachable vs indestructible.) I'm going to find the video on string theory they've made and add it to my to-do list! Thanks!
Thank you! I appreciate the love and welcome to the family! Really cool suggestions! I've added this to my to-do list and will do a reaction to it soon!
🌌💭 What's your take on the Information Paradox?
Do you think black holes really can delete information or is it just transformed in a way we don't understand yet?
Let's discuss below! 👇 And don't forget to like, subscribe, and ring the bell for more cosmic mysteries! 🔔
Thanks for watching the video! Great reactions as always. This is an older Kurzgesagt video, so they were a lot more lax on how they presented their information. 1:55 I'm assuming they're referring to a stellar black hole that doesn't have an accretion disk. Kurzgesagt's videos were made to be easy to digest, and are prone to be misinformed sometimes.
11:05 It doesn't really matter whether the stone is ripped apart, as long as we know exactly how, we can essentially reverse engineer it into the exact same stone, i.e. information isn't lost.
I think the analogy here is: much like how we can tell something went inside the pond when the water level rises, we can tell when something went inside a black hole when the event horizon grows.
The problem is that we have no way of retrieving that information. My take on this is that information is still indestructible, just unreachable. Like an encrypted hard drive.
14:22 I can definitely recommend their video on String Theory, it's a fun watch.
@decomposedcorpse5186 Haha, you've got a keen eye for spotting the lax presentation style of older Kurzgesagt videos! But hey, sometimes a little misinformed charm adds to the fun of spotting and correcting, right?
Again, thank you for the great video recommendation!
In regards to the stone thrown in the pond analogy,. Wouldn't, for example, taking a black-and-white low-res photo of the rock and then vaporizing it be closer to the analogy of what might actually be going on with the "information transfer"? I guess the ripples on the surface of the pond would carry even less information than a picture and be only temporary once the waves stop propagating on the surface. Whereas the rock still fully exists intact at the bottom of the pond.
But in either case, to me, it would appear the original information is lost not to just us but to existence itself since any object entering a black hole is torn apart atom by atom, no? (the debate on it being unreachable vs indestructible.)
I'm going to find the video on string theory they've made and add it to my to-do list! Thanks!
@decomposedcorpse5186 Just reacted to a video on string theory based on your recommendation. Check it out! ruclips.net/video/LKrvKCanNM4/видео.html
Hi!!! I really like your videos can you react to: can you upload your mind and live forever by kurzgesagt?
Thank you! I appreciate the love and welcome to the family! Really cool suggestions! I've added this to my to-do list and will do a reaction to it soon!