I think using Sawyer Robertson’s stats from last year where he had virtually no experience and had a horrible O-line isn’t the most genuine argument for what he’s capable of. He’s a far more mature player than last year as someone who’s actually watched him rather than stat tracked him.
The 3 keys to winning last week were..... 1. RUNNING THE BALL 15+ times(should be 20+)....making the defense guess all gm..... 2 defense.....great solo tackling..zero run after catch 3 Qb protection...no sacks....#2 had time to read entire field Hopefully Prime will experiment again this week using more balanced offense Baylor is beatable but the buffs need to be physical by running.
Kevin, you have to actually watch the games so you stop sounding ignorant about the buffs. You keep saying they have a seriously struggling kicker because Mata is 2-4, but one was a long one he missed the other was blocked. Jace Feeley missed a 61 yarder that you keep attributing to Mata also. Mata hasn't looked stellar but he's still reliable inside 40 yards.
@@NickWhite-rc5wyoh boy. Should Charlie O be starting at running back too? The kicking game is inconsistent, regardless of it being Mata or Feeley. You realize Mata hasn't made a kick from beyond 29 yards, so the team is quite literally never in field goal range.
@@LockedOnBuffs pretty testy for getting called on having a one guy covering multiple teams part time aren’t ya? I have actually watched this team for 25 years, and I am a data analyst by trade so I know a guy that was 87.5% over the last two seasons going 21/24 shouldn’t be called inconsistent after starting 2-4 with one blocked when he’s kicking in front of a line that has been highly inconsistent. I actually watch the team so I know he’s very reliable under 40 yards, especially from the center and right hash but lacks the leg strength for much more than 42 yards and sometimes pushes kicks from the left wide right. I know that longer kicks have mostly been tried by Jace Feely who has a leg but not great aim and he badly missed the 61 yard attempt, but almost no CFB kickers have any business attempting that one. And don’t talk to me about the running backs either, unlike you I can name every CU back with at least 50 carries for the last 25 years. Micah looked good for a freshman, but Augustave is the more complete back and looked better than Welch running, catching, and blocking other than his fumble but his yards per carry is lower because Welch had 1 25 yard run where he wasn’t touched by a DL or LB where Augustave pounded out yards after contact and just looked like the more experienced player he is. You know this if you watched the game instead of just pulling up stats kid.
@@NickWhite-rc5wy 😂well your data is wrong. Per the teams site, ESPN, and CFBR he's 12-of-16 75% in his two years in Boulder on field goals. Also...your data for the running backs is wrong Welch had more yards after contact (37) and also had more average yards after contact after contact 4.11 to Augstave's 18 and 3. Welch also graded out as the better blocker.
@@LockedOnBuffs stop goofing stats for gotchas and read the comment, if you do you’ll see I have his numbers for his ‘22 year at JSU and last season because they are a representative sample size, but even using last year and this year proves my point not yours. Your YAC stats are worthless with this small of a sample size as well considering one jersey touch counts as contact. If you learn about stats you’ll see the smaller the sample size the more outliers influence them so this early in the season you have to take them all with a grain of salt and rely more on what you see on film. Through all of this you still haven’t refuted that you prepare for this show watching highlights and googling stats. Everyone that watched the game knows Augustave is clearly the more physical back, though which is good too.
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
We need to get pressure on the Baylor QB, and go up early. Don't give Baylor ANY chances to win. Go Buffs!!
I think using Sawyer Robertson’s stats from last year where he had virtually no experience and had a horrible O-line isn’t the most genuine argument for what he’s capable of. He’s a far more mature player than last year as someone who’s actually watched him rather than stat tracked him.
@@Strawboston I mean he's a tough evaluation. It's either off of last year with a big sample size or this year against a bottom tier G5 team
The 3 keys to winning last week were.....
1. RUNNING THE BALL 15+ times(should be 20+)....making the defense guess all gm.....
2 defense.....great solo tackling..zero run after catch
3 Qb protection...no sacks....#2 had time to read entire field
Hopefully Prime will experiment again this week using more balanced offense
Baylor is beatable but the buffs need to be physical by running.
Kevin, you have to actually watch the games so you stop sounding ignorant about the buffs. You keep saying they have a seriously struggling kicker because Mata is 2-4, but one was a long one he missed the other was blocked. Jace Feeley missed a 61 yarder that you keep attributing to Mata also. Mata hasn't looked stellar but he's still reliable inside 40 yards.
@@NickWhite-rc5wyoh boy. Should Charlie O be starting at running back too? The kicking game is inconsistent, regardless of it being Mata or Feeley. You realize Mata hasn't made a kick from beyond 29 yards, so the team is quite literally never in field goal range.
If they are within 30 yards they have a better chance of going for it
@@LockedOnBuffs pretty testy for getting called on having a one guy covering multiple teams part time aren’t ya? I have actually watched this team for 25 years, and I am a data analyst by trade so I know a guy that was 87.5% over the last two seasons going 21/24 shouldn’t be called inconsistent after starting 2-4 with one blocked when he’s kicking in front of a line that has been highly inconsistent. I actually watch the team so I know he’s very reliable under 40 yards, especially from the center and right hash but lacks the leg strength for much more than 42 yards and sometimes pushes kicks from the left wide right. I know that longer kicks have mostly been tried by Jace Feely who has a leg but not great aim and he badly missed the 61 yard attempt, but almost no CFB kickers have any business attempting that one. And don’t talk to me about the running backs either, unlike you I can name every CU back with at least 50 carries for the last 25 years. Micah looked good for a freshman, but Augustave is the more complete back and looked better than Welch running, catching, and blocking other than his fumble but his yards per carry is lower because Welch had 1 25 yard run where he wasn’t touched by a DL or LB where Augustave pounded out yards after contact and just looked like the more experienced player he is. You know this if you watched the game instead of just pulling up stats kid.
@@NickWhite-rc5wy 😂well your data is wrong. Per the teams site, ESPN, and CFBR he's 12-of-16 75% in his two years in Boulder on field goals. Also...your data for the running backs is wrong
Welch had more yards after contact (37) and also had more average yards after contact after contact 4.11 to Augstave's 18 and 3. Welch also graded out as the better blocker.
@@LockedOnBuffs stop goofing stats for gotchas and read the comment, if you do you’ll see I have his numbers for his ‘22 year at JSU and last season because they are a representative sample size, but even using last year and this year proves my point not yours. Your YAC stats are worthless with this small of a sample size as well considering one jersey touch counts as contact. If you learn about stats you’ll see the smaller the sample size the more outliers influence them so this early in the season you have to take them all with a grain of salt and rely more on what you see on film. Through all of this you still haven’t refuted that you prepare for this show watching highlights and googling stats. Everyone that watched the game knows Augustave is clearly the more physical back, though which is good too.