@@EdThorne i find your videos very informative so it's only fair that I help a bit. I think you saved a bunch from burning money on audio interfaces :D.
Audient does have input metering when mic monitoring is turned on in the app and is shown on the LEDs, but to make it work properly you have to turn the mic monitoring volume (in the app) to maximum
The high end RedNet series Converters is what put the new Scarlett over the top for me. The improvement to the preamps was enough that I put the 4th gen over pretty much all interfaces at the same price point, for home audio recording. I also do mostly vocals, so it makes sense for me I guess. Great video!
Over years i had at least multiple 2 channel audio interface. This replaces my 4 audiophile DAC’s even MQA from tidal sounded amazing. Over and beyond its call for sound duty. Audient iD24 brings my untreated room to life. This is my last audio interface. It even beat back RME Black DAC i send that one back after 2 days.
Thanks for the review, though I'd already bought the 2i2 (upgraded from 3rd Gen) - it's noticeably (to my ears) better than its predecessor - I looked at Audient too but the price point here in NZ influenced my decision. Scarlett $359/Audient $549. Interesting to hear they are much the same price in UK & Europe.
This was my exact scenario. Received the id14 today. Loved the m2 BUT I noticed…the higher I put up the headphone volume…the more distortion/degradation I got on my inputs. It’s very very subtle, but it’s happening nonetheless. At first I thought it could just be my unit but after sifting reddit/the internet I saw I wasn’t the only person with this problem. Like I said it is hardly noticeable…something you need to be listening hard and “testing” for but regardless, I don’t want it to be there.
@@ryandunham9282 I’ve noticed the Audient is for sure less noisy when I plug my AxeFx in to track guitars. I didn’t realize the interference I was getting with the motu till I made the switch. For $100 more the id14 is worth it. If you don’t need as many inputs I’d ever check out the id4. Pretty sure same preamps, tech and quality, just less I/O
Just set the audients ID button to control the volume of outputs 3&4. Then the knob will control the volume of the speakers you're on. That's how I have mine set up, but I use 3&4 to reamp. It's extremely convenient.
Even a Behringer, or an old Tascam interface, sounded better than the scarlett 18i20 I started with. Wild how lo-fi the inputs sound, like a cassette tape or something.
Very nice video! I'm looking to get an interface for around $200 USD and the 2i2 and ID4 MKII are possibilities. If anyone has any thoughts I'd definitely be open to user experiences with them. Currently using it for podcasting, streaming, and maybe one day music.
I honestly think the Audient's muting system to be a minus, since it requires you to be super aware of what you are doing. When you have some sudden loud noise you just want to kill the volume right away, not have to change the mode and then tap the switch or lower the volume. Independent controls are always better or a complete master control that will change all levels at once.
you say the headphone amp is weak on all the scarlett ,would using lower impedance headphones or attaching a portable headphone amp improve this? i know absolutely zilch about audio intrerfaces but have had to use portable headphone amps for higher impedance headphones for my DAP's which is why i wondered if that could also apply to an Audio I/O
So your opinion is what I'm looking for here, I bought a Scarlett 2i2 second gen in 2018 I think it was, one of a few suggestions by an employee at Long and McQuade in Winnipeg, Canada because I was looking for a way to listen to the music at production music websites through my powered monitors, so anything you'd like to add to that, I'd be grateful.
I've been using Focusrite Scarlet devices since Win10, but the latest version of Win11 (23H2) has been causing BSOD and many page faults (crackling audio when this happens) with the 2i2 (2nd Gen, and 3rd Gen) maybe the 4th gen has these problems sorted? I wasn't willing to spend any more money on focusrite, so i picked up an ID14 and I could not be happier. Zero issues so far. Awesome preamps, and much more volume with headphones. The loop back feature is also handy with teams, skype, etc without having to install 3rd party virtual inputs.
Yeah it's honestly even better than my Apogee One, which slightly edged the Audient on the DAC quality (made everything out of the speakers have huge headroom and depth), but the Audient preamps are better than Apogee, at least at that level. Really impressed me given that my id14 has the functionality of the Duet at half the price.
@@powermosfet if there is still power sent over usb, yes it stays on. I use a powered usb hub and it stays on and retains settings from the PC. Audient is amazing and works perfectly everything I have tried.
Oh, Darn! I just ordered the Scarlett 2i2 and saw this video afterwards. Is there any way to remedy the low Headphone volume, like an external amp or anything like that?
Hi I am buying first audio interface. Should i buy 3rd gen or 4rth (which is most costly)? Purpose: live streaming concerts and lections to zoom / RUclips, band (drums, keyboard, gitars), church. Source: mixing console, stereo pair (jack jack).
Focusrite conversion is better, but save for the Calrett+. I had the the Audient ID44 thinking it would replace my Clarett, but the Audient was so muddy when I tried to create a mix; I ended up making the thinnest mix on it. As soon as I went back to the Carett I could hear what I was missing.
I believe all Focusrite interfaces (inc Scarlett and Claretts) have their RedNet converters in so they will actually be the same. The headphone amps are the same too, I believe. The main difference is the preamps and ADAT expandability. The Claretts are very good!
@@samueloluyinkaojomu6548 You are right! I am comparing the 1st generation ID44 to an older generation Clarett. But the hype on the Audient range was the same, echoed all across RUclips, etc. I had even pre-ordered it. And I thought it would be a game changer. I had to block out the hype noise and just trust my ears before returning the Audient. Because the praise just didn't match what I was listening to. I liked the design, but the Clarett could eat the Audient's lunch any day in critical listening tests.
The only reason that would happen would be if you used low impedance headphones with a non-flat impedance curve with it. High impedance outputs + low impedance dynamic driver headphomes will mess with the frequency response, often in the bass area.
Stuff like ‘air mode’ are beyond irrelevant. I mean if you want EQ just add EQ. WTH would a fixed EQ setting be a bonus? There’s NEVER a reason to use it over adding personalised EQ to a track. Stupid ‘features’ like this are worth multiple negative points imo.
Hey , thank you for this very helpful comparison! Can you tell me, how the Audient iD14 handles active humbuckers? I want to replace my Presonus Audiobox (yes, I know it's shit LOL) Thank you!
Hey, great review! I wanna ask for your recommendation, I'm looking for the best sound you can get for headphones and speakers that can also power 250 ohms headphones (dt 1990) I don't mind about preamps and DI, I only care about sound quality, what would you say is a good pick for that (out of any interface)? Also, is a dedicated amp/dac like the topping is actually worth it over any of these? or is the difference negligible? I was looking at the new presonus quantum es2 aswell, maybe you could review this too to compare?
It does sound cleaner yes. More focussed and better separation. More dynamic range. Much cleaner headphone output with less distortion when using low impedance headphones. I got an id14 mk2 for £90 so it was a no brainer.
The id14 does sounds great, but sounds slightly more fuzzy and less focussed than mk2. No surprise when going from 117db to 125 dB dynamic range. The headphone output is more of a difference, equally as high quality as the main outputs...
It’s weak output power wise but it has the better sound due to the RedNet conversion. When recording I like a loud monitor mix so I’d want to use the Audient but for mixing for long periods you don’t want to mix loud so I recommend the Scarlett.
After listening to these recordings a few times, in my opinion, The Scarlet sounds like it's being attenuated too much. Towards the mid high to high range it sound like it's being digitally compressed too much compared to the Audient.
@@EdThorne Hi, Thank you for your reply. From the videos I've seen, the Lewit Connect 6 seems to be a very good product. Whereas Focusrite is often criticized.
What would you choose between Focusrite Scarlett Solo (Gen 4) and Audient iD4 (mkii)? I will not use them for recording, just for mixing in daw with my headphones.
I’m not sure what you thought this video was about? 😜 For mixing, check out this interface. Far better than these two for mixing: ruclips.net/video/n0fyFRl2R24/видео.htmlsi=VWHaxIE99vdEGA10
They are good but not even close to my black lion revolution 2x2 which can easy pass for a lynx hilo if you listen closely while using it its a all in one solution
Make sure the sample rate is synced between the Scarlett and your DAW, and don’t use above 75% input gain. Also, check your cable. Humming is likely to be a grounding issue from a damaged cable.
There’s an RTL chart on my website in the member area (link in the video description). I can’t remember off the top of my head but I think the Scarlett. The Motu’s have the best RTLs.
@@EdThorne The microphone certainly works but in my very personal opinion I find it not the best in terms of vocality. The nt1 with the same price offers (in term of voice recording) a quality that is difficult to find at that price
The scarlett as usual, is much inferior, if we compared with Audient, Motu and so on. Frankly I can't understand how anybody can recoment in ANY scenearios this red thing, even for beginners, wtf the impedance and power output are lame. For heavens sake don't buy scarletts, the red colour is not important!
When you consider the RME fireface 800 was cutting edge 20 years ago, and it has a dynamic range over 10dB less than the scarlet, I don't think it really matters so much anymore.
🌟 Hi-Resolution Audio Files & Specs/RTL Chart - edthorne.com/exclusive-content 🎬 Auto-Gain & Safe Mode Tutorial: ruclips.net/video/6axDCNkjtvE/видео.html 🎬 Ten Things You Didn't Know About Your Scarlett Gen 4: ruclips.net/video/OwNqH3ZtjjA/видео.html
very comprehensive. I love the Audient and I have an EVO SP8 but I think I may go with the Scarlett because of the headphone preamps. I primarily mix and create in headphones
Why does nobody ever review the quality and after care support for windows 11 drivers. Had to log a call with focusrite cause their windows 10/11 drivers are crap. In thr end downgrading to win7 drivers worked fine (go figure). Nobody talks about pops and crackles from bad drivers. No point banging on about preamp quality scores if the drivers are garbage. Also loopback and direct monitoring is very important and always missed off reviews😂
I have a Scarlett gen 3 solo running on win 10 optimised for best performance and after a few midi tracks I having to max out the sample rate to stop stutters and pops. In comparison to my Steinberg UR22C it is worse in this aspect. I’m sure they could improve the asio drivers?
@@Appleloucious FCPX reset to a default export setting when I updated it and I didn’t notice until someone else pointed it out. It’s been fixed. Thanks.
Thanks!
You are very kind, thank you! I probably get one of these a year, so that is appreciated!
@@EdThorne i find your videos very informative so it's only fair that I help a bit. I think you saved a bunch from burning money on audio interfaces :D.
Now if only all my 25k subscribers thought the same way 🫣🤣 I’m glad the videos are helpful 🙂
The Audient is the bomb. Especially with the ID24
That’s probably the best Audient there is (features to value ratio!).
@@EdThorne then you need to check out the new Audient Oria. It's feature packed
@@EdThorne What really is a difference between MK1 and MK2? Can't find any info anywhere and I am thinking between iD 44 and iD 24 because of that.
i have the audient and love it, theres 1 negative and that's there's no off switch on it
Audient does have input metering when mic monitoring is turned on in the app and is shown on the LEDs, but to make it work properly you have to turn the mic monitoring volume (in the app) to maximum
You are correct. I tested for this and missed it somehow. So annoying. Thanks.
The high end RedNet series Converters is what put the new Scarlett over the top for me.
The improvement to the preamps was enough that I put the 4th gen over pretty much all interfaces at the same price point, for home audio recording.
I also do mostly vocals, so it makes sense for me I guess.
Great video!
Over years i had at least multiple 2 channel audio interface. This replaces my 4 audiophile DAC’s even MQA from tidal sounded amazing. Over and beyond its call for sound duty. Audient iD24 brings my untreated room to life. This is my last audio interface. It even beat back RME Black DAC i send that one back after 2 days.
should i invest into the id24, i14, or id4 so i can use it with sm7b
@@ryandunham9282they're all 60db gain. Sm7b wants at least 57. You'll want an inline preamp to boost regardless.
@@ryandunham9282 id14 has optical input which can be useful to use with smart TVs compared to id4.
I said that if the Scarlet would outperform the Audient that I would eat the armrest off my mixing desk. It definitely would be emotional for me 😂🤣😅
It was close. Pros and cons for both, as explained.
Audient ,just ordered one.
id14 is love
I’ve got a lot of love for the Audient team. Lovely fellas.
been wanting to watch a comparison like this for a while, thanks Ed!
Hopefully it’s helpful🙂
As for self noise, independent testing from Get.Beautiful.Recordings has the Focusrite about twice as noisy as the ID14.
Thanks for the review, though I'd already bought the 2i2 (upgraded from 3rd Gen) - it's noticeably (to my ears) better than its predecessor - I looked at Audient too but the price point here in NZ influenced my decision. Scarlett $359/Audient $549. Interesting to hear they are much the same price in UK & Europe.
Audient are consistently a class above at their given price points across the board!
Very high quality.
Both are good, but I'll stick with my audient as it has a much more powerful headphone amp.
Better preamps too.
Always very informative and to the point, Ed. That's the way I like it.
Thanks. Hopefully it was informative.
The iD14 delivers a much much better Signal Quality
About a million percent better? Or only half a million percent better?
The audient id14 mk2 is the only budget interface I’d replace my Motu M2 with.
This was my exact scenario. Received the id14 today. Loved the m2 BUT I noticed…the higher I put up the headphone volume…the more distortion/degradation I got on my inputs. It’s very very subtle, but it’s happening nonetheless. At first I thought it could just be my unit but after sifting reddit/the internet I saw I wasn’t the only person with this problem. Like I said it is hardly noticeable…something you need to be listening hard and “testing” for but regardless, I don’t want it to be there.
@@joeylo should i just bite the bullet on the id 14 then?
@@ryandunham9282 I’ve noticed the Audient is for sure less noisy when I plug my AxeFx in to track guitars. I didn’t realize the interference I was getting with the motu till I made the switch. For $100 more the id14 is worth it. If you don’t need as many inputs I’d ever check out the id4. Pretty sure same preamps, tech and quality, just less I/O
Just set the audients ID button to control the volume of outputs 3&4. Then the knob will control the volume of the speakers you're on. That's how I have mine set up, but I use 3&4 to reamp. It's extremely convenient.
Excellent honest camparison of Scarlett and audient audio interfaces.
Thanks, Harvinder!
Nice one Ed
Thanks. Hope it was informative.
Even a Behringer, or an old Tascam interface, sounded better than the scarlett 18i20 I started with. Wild how lo-fi the inputs sound, like a cassette tape or something.
I can hear the toan better on iD14. The luscious creamy thick mids is better. Toan is stored in the audio interface.
Audient > Focusrite. They have waaay better preamps without noise literally, and much cleaner sound in general
Very nice video! I'm looking to get an interface for around $200 USD and the 2i2 and ID4 MKII are possibilities. If anyone has any thoughts I'd definitely be open to user experiences with them. Currently using it for podcasting, streaming, and maybe one day music.
Thanks. Wait for my next video. Strong contender in that!
I honestly think the Audient's muting system to be a minus, since it requires you to be super aware of what you are doing. When you have some sudden loud noise you just want to kill the volume right away, not have to change the mode and then tap the switch or lower the volume.
Independent controls are always better or a complete master control that will change all levels at once.
Why test the Scarlett consumer product? The Clarett+ is the Professional line from Focusrite!
I have just got rid of a clarret utter garbage to weak a signal
you say the headphone amp is weak on all the scarlett ,would using lower impedance headphones or attaching a portable headphone amp improve this? i know absolutely zilch about audio intrerfaces but have had to use portable headphone amps for higher impedance headphones for my DAP's which is why i wondered if that could also apply to an Audio I/O
So your opinion is what I'm looking for here, I bought a Scarlett 2i2 second gen in 2018 I think it was, one of a few suggestions by an employee at Long and McQuade in Winnipeg, Canada because I was looking for a way to listen to the music at production music websites through my powered monitors, so anything you'd like to add to that, I'd be grateful.
I've been using Focusrite Scarlet devices since Win10, but the latest version of Win11 (23H2) has been causing BSOD and many page faults (crackling audio when this happens) with the 2i2 (2nd Gen, and 3rd Gen) maybe the 4th gen has these problems sorted? I wasn't willing to spend any more money on focusrite, so i picked up an ID14 and I could not be happier. Zero issues so far. Awesome preamps, and much more volume with headphones. The loop back feature is also handy with teams, skype, etc without having to install 3rd party virtual inputs.
Yeah it's honestly even better than my Apogee One, which slightly edged the Audient on the DAC quality (made everything out of the speakers have huge headroom and depth), but the Audient preamps are better than Apogee, at least at that level. Really impressed me given that my id14 has the functionality of the Duet at half the price.
Does audient stay on even if you shut down the pc. Is it real? I 've read this in a comment.
@@powermosfet if there is still power sent over usb, yes it stays on. I use a powered usb hub and it stays on and retains settings from the PC. Audient is amazing and works perfectly everything I have tried.
Oh, Darn! I just ordered the Scarlett 2i2 and saw this video afterwards. Is there any way to remedy the low Headphone volume, like an external amp or anything like that?
Hi
I am buying first audio interface. Should i buy 3rd gen or 4rth (which is most costly)?
Purpose: live streaming concerts and lections to zoom / RUclips, band (drums, keyboard, gitars), church. Source: mixing console, stereo pair (jack jack).
For a first interface the gen 3 2i2 would do all that you need and should be cheaper compared to gen 4.
Focusrite conversion is better, but save for the Calrett+. I had the the Audient ID44 thinking it would replace my Clarett, but the Audient was so muddy when I tried to create a mix; I ended up making the thinnest mix on it. As soon as I went back to the Carett I could hear what I was missing.
I believe all Focusrite interfaces (inc Scarlett and Claretts) have their RedNet converters in so they will actually be the same. The headphone amps are the same too, I believe. The main difference is the preamps and ADAT expandability. The Claretts are very good!
I would guess you are using ID44 mki i cos the AD/DA chip on the Audient ID44 mkii and ID24 are top of the line. Using ESS converters.
@@samueloluyinkaojomu6548 You are right! I am comparing the 1st generation ID44 to an older generation Clarett. But the hype on the Audient range was the same, echoed all across RUclips, etc. I had even pre-ordered it. And I thought it would be a game changer. I had to block out the hype noise and just trust my ears before returning the Audient. Because the praise just didn't match what I was listening to. I liked the design, but the Clarett could eat the Audient's lunch any day in critical listening tests.
Same Opinion here on the Audient, although i realy want to love the Audient.
The only reason that would happen would be if you used low impedance headphones with a non-flat impedance curve with it. High impedance outputs + low impedance dynamic driver headphomes will mess with the frequency response, often in the bass area.
Why companies keep removing the usefull feature of balance between input/playback....
Would love to see comparison between the new Presonus ES2 and Audient id14?
Stuff like ‘air mode’ are beyond irrelevant. I mean if you want EQ just add EQ. WTH would a fixed EQ setting be a bonus? There’s NEVER a reason to use it over adding personalised EQ to a track.
Stupid ‘features’ like this are worth multiple negative points imo.
Any stereo DAW 100 Euros and over is almost indistinguishable these days.
I have the id24!
should i get a ID14, VOLT2 or SSL (not the plus one)
Great video comparison!
Which Scarlett: best to worst Gen2, Gen3, Gen4, then Gen1
Gen 3 for the preamps. Gen 4 for everything else.
Hey , thank you for this very helpful comparison! Can you tell me, how the Audient iD14 handles active humbuckers? I want to replace my Presonus Audiobox (yes, I know it's shit LOL) Thank you!
Hey, great review!
I wanna ask for your recommendation, I'm looking for the best sound you can get for headphones and speakers that can also power 250 ohms headphones (dt 1990)
I don't mind about preamps and DI, I only care about sound quality, what would you say is a good pick for that (out of any interface)?
Also, is a dedicated amp/dac like the topping is actually worth it over any of these? or is the difference negligible?
I was looking at the new presonus quantum es2 aswell, maybe you could review this too to compare?
The Topping E2X2 has THE best headphone amplifier on any interface under £1800!
Thanks Ed...I have the original Audient ID14...Is the MK2 worth the upgrade..or is the difference negligable?
No need of upgrading audient. Just buy UAD 1176 compressor.
Probably not. I’d jump up a level if you want a proper upgrade. Apollo Twin or RME.
@@HarvinderSingh-yy8th And a Neumann U47 while you're at it!
It does sound cleaner yes. More focussed and better separation. More dynamic range. Much cleaner headphone output with less distortion when using low impedance headphones. I got an id14 mk2 for £90 so it was a no brainer.
The id14 does sounds great, but sounds slightly more fuzzy and less focussed than mk2. No surprise when going from 117db to 125 dB dynamic range. The headphone output is more of a difference, equally as high quality as the main outputs...
Why if the Scarlett headphone output is weak, would you recommend it for headphone mixing? What is special over headphone mixing on the Audient?
It’s weak output power wise but it has the better sound due to the RedNet conversion. When recording I like a loud monitor mix so I’d want to use the Audient but for mixing for long periods you don’t want to mix loud so I recommend the Scarlett.
@@EdThorne Ah, OK, that makes sense. It just was not too clear why at the end of your video. Thanks for your reply 🙂
Great comparison and video!
As a newbie, is either of these interfaces able to record from a Moog Werkstatt?
TIA 😊
They both have 2 x line inputs, so as long as your synth has a line output, then yes.
After listening to these recordings a few times, in my opinion, The Scarlet sounds like it's being attenuated too much. Towards the mid high to high range it sound like it's being digitally compressed too much compared to the Audient.
Everyone remember that only the 2i2 and 4i4 has that 69db of gain, not the solo.
What does this mean for better vocals
I so wanted to skip to the conclusion, but you told me not to, so I didn’t. 😂
Haha. Thanks
Boom or ID4 for headphones monitoring?
any tips for an audio interface that allows two sets of monitors and doesn't collect dust in the volume control
Dyson make one I think… 😉🫣
I’d recommend the MOTU.
Stay away from presonus studio. All the potentiometers got crackling. It’s junk.
ID24 has four outputs
Hi,
I would have liked a comparison with the Lewitt Connect 6 interface. Thank you.
No-one uses it. These are the most popular devices in this price range.
@@EdThorne Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
From the videos I've seen, the Lewit Connect 6 seems to be a very good product.
Whereas Focusrite is often criticized.
How do these stack up with the Black Lion Revolution 2x2 ?
What would you choose between Focusrite Scarlett Solo (Gen 4) and Audient iD4 (mkii)? I will not use them for recording, just for mixing in daw with my headphones.
I’m not sure what you thought this video was about? 😜 For mixing, check out this interface. Far better than these two for mixing: ruclips.net/video/n0fyFRl2R24/видео.htmlsi=VWHaxIE99vdEGA10
Big difference in price: Audient, $285.95, Scarlett, $169.99
In Europe both cost the same price. You can find them around €185. 😕
They are good but not even close to my black lion revolution 2x2 which can easy pass for a lynx hilo if you listen closely while using it its a all in one solution
Audient must include MIDI port.
Audient sounded more realistic; the Scarlett sounds sterile, like something is missing
I think that’s the difference between analog and digital preamps. Exactly what you’ve described.
How did you manage and cancel out the humming and static sound in the scarlet? I experienced this issue with my Scarlett
Make sure the sample rate is synced between the Scarlett and your DAW, and don’t use above 75% input gain. Also, check your cable. Humming is likely to be a grounding issue from a damaged cable.
@@EdThorne thank you so much for the prompt replay and advice.
what audio interface should i buy to power the shure sm7b without having problems with sound?
The Scarlett Gen 4 has 60dB of gain which is plenty for an SM7b.
Which interface has the fastest round trip latency?
RTL chart available on my website. But the Gen 4 is faster.
So no question here the scsrlett has better converters
I wish the Scarlett would add ADAT. That feature alone puts the iD14 over the top for me, to be honest. I own a 4th gen 4i4.
The ADAT definitely sets the Audient’s apart.
they do have adat
@@nathanbuckner5660 not in the Scarlett.
@@robfoster5500 the Scarlett 18i8 and 18i20 has adat
@@nathanbuckner5660 right...but that's not the Gen 4 line. That's Gen 3. This video is about the Gen 4 stuff.
What is better with latency?
There’s an RTL chart on my website in the member area (link in the video description). I can’t remember off the top of my head but I think the Scarlett. The Motu’s have the best RTLs.
Ed, love your channel. But do you really use a Focusrite in your own studio? Why bother? Just stick to the Apollo ecosystem
Do I even need to answer this question? 😜 I use my Neve preamps into my X16.
Audient iD14 will be good for beyerdynamics dt 990 pro? i ve heard that this headphones are too quiet on some interfaces
Idk about the audient iD14 but the scarlett 2i2 4th Gen has enough headphones preamp for the DT 990 Pro (I have one myself)
Can you help me which one should I buy for rap vocals microphone Lewit 440 pure
Dont buy 440 pure I tried it and its result is inconsistent...Opt for Nt1
How can a microphone be inconsistent? It either works or it doesn’t…
@@EdThorne The microphone certainly works but in my very personal opinion I find it not the best in terms of vocality. The nt1 with the same price offers (in term of voice recording) a quality that is difficult to find at that price
The scarlett as usual, is much inferior, if we compared with Audient, Motu and so on. Frankly I can't understand how anybody can recoment in ANY scenearios this red thing, even for beginners, wtf the impedance and power output are lame. For heavens sake don't buy scarletts, the red colour is not important!
The red colour is not important 😂, like it's a decoration for the studio😂
The low end MOTU have noisy preamps and design flaws
They sound great, I’m having a lot of results!!
When you consider the RME fireface 800 was cutting edge 20 years ago, and it has a dynamic range over 10dB less than the scarlet, I don't think it really matters so much anymore.
I use Arturia…. Better than Scarlett by far
rme?
Not in this price point.
Audient >
First
Legend!
stay away from Focusrite stuff!!
🌟 Hi-Resolution Audio Files & Specs/RTL Chart - edthorne.com/exclusive-content
🎬 Auto-Gain & Safe Mode Tutorial: ruclips.net/video/6axDCNkjtvE/видео.html
🎬 Ten Things You Didn't Know About Your Scarlett Gen 4: ruclips.net/video/OwNqH3ZtjjA/видео.html
It’s all rubbish the only thing different is the price basically they’re all the same
what should i buy? just save up for babyface?
Good choice
very comprehensive. I love the Audient and I have an EVO SP8 but I think I may go with the Scarlett because of the headphone preamps. I primarily mix and create in headphones
Lol who record the tracks in 192k anyway?! Audio is definitely better with Audient for my ears.
Hmm.. always something.. would love Audient, and annoyed to power button.. hmm
I'm a beginner guitarist which should i buy as my first interface audient id4 mkII or scarlett solo 4gen?
ID sounds fuller and Scarlett sounds ligher. Scarlett designs the sound a little more than ID. ID is industrial recommended AI.
Even a gen 3 solo is fine. Unless you doing studio quality recording you will not notice a lot of difference in recorded sound quality.
The low headphone output on the 2i2 is ridiculous. I'm playing solo and can barely hear myself. So frustrating.
Yep, it's a real problem with the device. Check out this interface! ruclips.net/video/n0fyFRl2R24/видео.html
Which mic did you use in this video for vocal performance on both interfaces?
JZ Amethyst. In hind sight the Lewitt 440 Pure would have been a better choice (brighter and more budget friendly).
Thank you
Could someone explain gain staging please?
Why does nobody ever review the quality and after care support for windows 11 drivers. Had to log a call with focusrite cause their windows 10/11 drivers are crap. In thr end downgrading to win7 drivers worked fine (go figure). Nobody talks about pops and crackles from bad drivers. No point banging on about preamp quality scores if the drivers are garbage. Also loopback and direct monitoring is very important and always missed off reviews😂
Because most people are on Mac which doesn’t require driver support.
I have a Scarlett gen 3 solo running on win 10 optimised for best performance and after a few midi tracks I having to max out the sample rate to stop stutters and pops. In comparison to my Steinberg UR22C it is worse in this aspect. I’m sure they could improve the asio drivers?
Why are you only recording in 720p? It is 2024! XD
@@Appleloucious FCPX reset to a default export setting when I updated it and I didn’t notice until someone else pointed it out. It’s been fixed. Thanks.
I’ve been eyeing up the iD4 to carry around with me
Correct eying.