90% sure these are all just faked numbers. I have better performance than these numbers at 4k res with a two year old 6950xt. Currently I'm using a 4080 super and with ray tracing/dlss enabled I'm still pulling higher numbers than some of these. In most games at high-ultra settings I can get around 100 fps in 4k.
@@nephilimslayer 6950 no frame gen, definitely no dlss or ray tracing and you are still looking at 60-80 fps in some 4k settings. That's what I mean, these are extremely low for not having ray tracing on. The 4080 with ray tracing is getting about what is listed. Turn it off and you're well ahead of this, even with dlss off. So the 4090? Look at different benches videos, they'll use some of the same games. These numbers are just too far off.
these are the top gpus in 2024 and they struggle to get 100fps at 1440p and 4k, optimization sucks in 2024
7900xt, 4k, 26fps in sh2 is wild...
@jamminen74 u can see 4k is not viable,
maybe the 5090 will do better at 4k gaming
90% sure these are all just faked numbers. I have better performance than these numbers at 4k res with a two year old 6950xt. Currently I'm using a 4080 super and with ray tracing/dlss enabled I'm still pulling higher numbers than some of these. In most games at high-ultra settings I can get around 100 fps in 4k.
@@SAwesome2 u are using dlss, this guy didnt use anything, not frame gen and not dlss
@@nephilimslayer 6950 no frame gen, definitely no dlss or ray tracing and you are still looking at 60-80 fps in some 4k settings. That's what I mean, these are extremely low for not having ray tracing on. The 4080 with ray tracing is getting about what is listed. Turn it off and you're well ahead of this, even with dlss off. So the 4090? Look at different benches videos, they'll use some of the same games. These numbers are just too far off.
I have a RX7900XT ASUS TUF Stalker 2 - 165,1 fps all epic settings
When testing AMD GPUs, Why do you guys pair it with Intel processors?😒
Make it make sense