Fun fact: The reason why the monkey attacks in Japan occurred was literally because they were being fed in the first place. Monkeys live in a hierarchical system. When people feed monkeys, they are immediately seen as a low-ranking member of the troop. So, higher-ranking monkeys will always abuse their power & bully the lower-ranking members, in this case, us. Same thing happens wherever & whenever people & monkeys live together, from macaques in Thailand to baboons in South Africa, which are much worse than macaques cuz they’re some of the biggest of monkeys with canines as long as a man’s thumb!
The United States Federal Department of Fish and Game wouldn't allow such things to take place; killing people, stealing small children. An immediate response to this type of nuisance would be to wipe them out. So even if they did get smart and become an eminent threat to the security of humankind, it would be the evolved primate's death sentence.
When I was a kid I thought that jungle guerilla warfare meant that people were training gorillas how to fight using rifles. I used to have nightmares about it too.
"raven lord" I never got such a misconception like that but I did wonder why it is called guerrilla warfare. I wondered if it was because people behave like gorillas and hide in the jungles to capture their prey.
Chimpanzees are stronger because their muscles are structured differently. Chimps have more muscle mass in the large muscle category, whereas humans have a whole lot more small muscle control. Basically, humans sacrificed strength for dexterity and finesse. We have much better small muscle control which is needed to have the nimble finger control. Chimpanzees have difficulty doing small tasks, like threading a needle or assembling small parts. Humans developed this when making tools and weapons. We continued to evolve more small muscle control to the point we can play musical instruments and many other tasks that require the small muscle control. It’s most likely that our ape ancestors were as strong as any other primate, Neanderthals were far more powerful because they maintained more large muscle mass. Chances are that Neanderthals didn’t quite have the dexterity that our ancestors had. Maybe that’s why they didn’t make it in the long run. They were certainly able to make primitive tools, but without our dexterity, they were unable to make the more advanced tools our ancestors were able to. Another advantage humans have over apes is the small muscle control necessary to throw objects in an overhand motion with great accuracy. Humans actually commit a large section of our brains to this one task, it was so important as a hunter because missile weapons are far more successful than melee weapons when taking out prey from a safe distance. That allowed humans to be able to strike their prey while being outside of it’s ability to smell, hear or see us coming. Chimpanzee toss in an underhand motion and are terrible at aiming accurately. When chimps hunt, they use only their hands to kill their prey which places them at great risk of injury. Some of the chimps lose their lives hunting because they fall from the trees while chis g the monkeys who are superior climbers Some may lose their lives to infections from bites from the monkeys. It’s safer to kill from a distance, so it’s obvious why we developed that ability. The instinct to throw objects with accuracy begins at a very young age . Anyone who has been around toddlers knows that they can already throw toys and other objects with fairy good accuracy, even at the age of two. Our drive to hone this craft is so strong that we have invented hundreds of sports dedicated to this action, from baseballs, bowling balls, darts and the one that really shows how good we can be would be football. Thats because the quarterback must hit a moving target. That was an important skill to our ancestors and takes a lot of different small muscles and brain capacity to calculate where the target will be when the missile weapon arrives, even if it’s just a rock. Our ancestors were great rock throwers. Calculating the path of the running target and leading it with the proper amount to meet that moving target was a great advantage when hunting animals that will most likely flee once the Hunter is located. In order to evolve to be as smart as humans, chimpanzees and other primates would have to sacrifice their greater strength in order to have the dexterity to build high tech objects. They would also have to learn to control their tempers and aggressiveness in order to work better as a society. Human technology grew much faster when we learned to get along so we could share ideas to advance technology much faster. Apes would have to do the same, so by the time they’re as smart as us, they’ll most likely be as weak as we are. Our weakness is a big reason why we are the modern societies we are. Once we learned to throw with accuracy, humans became the most dangerous predator on the Serengeti plains. Being able to strike our prey or enemy from a distance makes even lions and other large predators fear humans naturally. Every animal learned that these little weak apes can injure you from a great distance, so you can’t strike back with all of your muscles, teeth and claws when you’re held at a distance. They must have instilled this into even their offspring, because nearly every animal on the planet fears humans naturally and will flee at the sight of us. Once they experience the pain we can deliver from a safe distance, they are far more likely to avoid us. Even our stronger cousins in the ape family learn quickly that we are nothing to mess with. That was just with spears, darts and arrows, long before we had firearms. The ability to use missile weapons made us a natural for firearms. It is the same ancient ability of aiming and hitting a moving target, which made us great hunters long ago, that allows us to accurately aim a firearm and even allow for the lead distance needed to hit a moving target.
Not only that, but once we injured an animal we had the ability to chase it to the point of exhaustion. We see this today with tribes running down healthy animals to the point the animal will collapse, the chase can take hours and most animals cannot maintain a quick pace thay long
Look at bonobos. They rarely harm their children like chimps. That’s why it’s impossible to generalise primates as being inherently savage. Each species is very unique. Gorillas are also apes and super strong, yet they have a very high threshold for violence and they don’t often attack people or even other gorillas.
Monkeys is similar to humans they also have hierarchy. They also have poor and rich on their hierarchy. You should def watch a documentary about them made by disney is really well made.
I watched a documentary where at this resort monkeys would steal alcoholic drinks. Some of them stole no drinks, some of them stole a few drinks where as a moderate percentage would get stinking blackout drunk. It seem to correlate to human behavior indicating that some monkeys are teetotalers, some were casual drinkers and some were skid row drunks.
"You can't do anything about it, because they're sacred animals" Well, there's your problem. The issue is not really about the monkeys. It's about human decisions. That is the problem. Humans absolutely do have options.
@@kie-skatemods4141 people said that about wolves, then the elk that wolves hunted started eating the landscapes barren, every native animal has it's place, heaven's if I know what a Chimp's is
No that's not truth those monkeys are in my village too and if they come to unleash havoc we throw stones at them call monkey catchers or use sticks yes they are sacred till they accept food peacefully if they misbehave we are free for action.
To point 2: Ya do realize that at one point in our evolutionary history, _we_ had that increased strength, right? Brains like ours take a lot of energy to develop and maintain, which meant we had to sacrifice something in order to follow our more dedicated tool-using evolutionary path. If there had been sufficient evolutionary pressure to require both the immense strength _and_ increased intelligence, we might have kept that strength as something other than an emergency boost in our fight-or-flight response. Plus, because our brains got bigger, we had to develop more complicated social structures since our babies required more time and effort to care for in their early stages of development. Comparatively speaking, the babies of other animals are far, far more capable after birth than a human infant is. Most other animals' babies can at least move about on their own within minutes of birth...ours take up to 2 years to do that with any semblance of skill. But even then, they can hardly care for themselves effectively until their mid to late teens! Most other animals? Some can take care of themselves as early as 6 months, for those that even require parental care to begin with! Evolution is all about trade-offs, and given the advantages of tool-use...maintaining immense strength is hardly necessary when you have access to--and the ability to invent--new tools with which to compensate or accomplish tasks you couldn't do before. It's far more likely that that any other species (on our planet at least) that developed to the point of human-esque sapience would have do so by trading in most, if not all, of their other capabilities in the process.
GOTTA GET THE SUPREME TO REPEAL THE BILL OF RIGHTS....WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIDENT ..... ALL MEN ARE CREATED.....YOU'RE ARGUING WITH LAW ... NOT 'THEORY ' .......
No, if they end up evolving human like inteilligence by that time we humans would have evolved too, so they would not blend at all. It is very unlikely it will ever happen because the world of today doesn't have the same conditions that allowed us to evolve the way we did. Also it would take millions of years or hundreds of thousands at least for other primates to maybe evolve more intelligence... I highly doubt we humans will even last that long.
You are referring to monkeys and chimps indescriminately. This is a huge mistake. Chimps are not monkeys they are apes and their behavior is very dissimilar. Chimps do not and cannot be allowed to intermingle with humans. A chimp attack would invariably be fatal. While they have been kept as pets while they are very young, it is illegal in most places to keep a mature chimp. While monkeys are intelligent, chimps have the distinction of being nearest to humans in that regard. Any discussion lumping chimps and monkeys together would have to be on primates in general as they share very few behavioral characteristics. nearist
we are monkeys apes and primates. these are all steps in the tree of life. just because you are an ape doesnt mean you are not a monkey anymore. just because something evolved from another thing doesnt mean you lose the name of your anchestors.
@@theflyingdutchguy9870 We are primates but not apes or monkeys. The difference is the evolution. We did not evolve from monkeys. We share a common ancestor. Theres a big difference. This is proven by fossils and our DNA.
@@iamposeidond We are apes. Apes are "any tailless primate of the families Hylobatidae (gibbons) and Hominidae (chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, gorillas, and human beings)."
As a chemical engineer I'm actually wondering how it's scientifecally possible to estimate a gorilla would be able to bench press 4000 pounds. You can measure the animals punch strenght and you would be able to guess how strong it is, but I say it's a wild take to say it can lift 4000 pounds. However 1 punch could definetetly 1 hit KO a human.
@@frankorobinson1540 My point is it's an estimation and I didn't see how they would be able to have a decent estimation. Also... youtube is no scientific paper. RUclips or natgeo will always take the maxima. If a paper says they estimate a gorilla would be able to lift between 2500-4000 pounds they'll take the maximum estimation value. Btw. Since oxygen, nitrogen and all the other substances (such as our food) in our atmosphere and on our planet are chemicals ofcourse we ingest chemicals. Glad I could educate you, bro. ;-)
I died laughing when he said "MaCock wasnt even hungry" and then he kept sayin it. I might be too immature for monkey knowledge. But then again, who named them that XD
i often hear ppl say that chimps are stronger as they can lift up to 1,260 lbs with their arms (human wr is 770 lbs) often is not mentioned that for example the human leg is still twice as strong as an arm of an chimp being able to lift 1,120kg (2400 lbs)
That is BS. Myth. These people have no idea how heavy 1000lbs alone is. Most humans struggle lifting 170lbs. This would be like a chimp bench pressing a fucking kodiac bear, (Which can weigh 1500lbs) that are multiple times stronger, larger, and heavier than chimps.
When I was 7 My aunt got bitten by a monkey and a monkey from behind scratched my neck. Luckily, my neck did not suffer any critical injuries and damage but my aunt took a few days to recover.
I highly doubt a gorilla could bench 4k pounds. They’re built more for dragging/pulling anyway, as opposed to pushing. Even then, to see a gorilla at full strength, we’d have to find a way to get them to train the actual lift; which is not exactly easy and thus makes gauging their strength relative to humans a bit more complicated.
So its OK if we volunteer you to find out? Im not saying your wrong, but if a chimpanzee can rip a woman’s face off and nearly tear her arm off in a fit of rage, Id say a gorilla could break you in half. That does not require 2 tons of force.
guinness world records lists 1800lbs as the most weight lifted by a gorilla. humans top out around 900 (trained obviously), though, a gorilla can throw is 990 lbs of force, where a human would max out around 100
You left out that we are the primates that evolved into humans. We are technically great apes. You pointed out now it would be dangerous for us if they suddenly MUTATED (not truly evolved in a normal way) to suddenly have only ONE change... have our brains without losing any of their traits in exchange. That's a parallel to Planet of the Apes.
We're not "technically great Apes" we ARE Great Apes, Chimps and humans evolved down separate branches of the Great Ape tree, We never evolved from Chimp's and they will never evolve into humans !
Evolution isn't an instant process. And with intelligence, it really is a first come, first serve kinda deal. Humans aren't so different than apes. Our entire history was brought up on bloodshed, domination, subjugation and slavery. We wouldn't be here today if those "inhumane" practices didn't pave the way over the last 10, 000 years. And we still do it today, but on species other than ourselves. And why we've abolished slavery and enacted social structures that ban intense violence only in the last 200 years. Only in recent history have we developed so far that we can have the relaxed first-world lives that we do with machines and complicated social structures and resource management at the governmental level and not resort to such wild behaviors in daily life on the basic individual level. Also: If we see apes becoming a threat to humans as if they were to develop some Superman-esque strength AND intelligence over the next million years, we would put a stop to it. Just like we've done to every other threat, even to our own kind. This is why I said it's a first come, first serve situation. They can't develop on a far off planet out of our sight for a million years and suddenly appear. Not to mention that evolution isn't a one way street. If we need more strength, we can evolve it alongside them and retain our intelligence. Humans are not the apex of evolution. We're still evolving today as we speak. We just don't have a need right now because there's no competition, as anything we need revolving such is done with infighting against our own species with tools and weapons. And we can get more strength even today with said technology. Exosuits can put even the strongest gorilla to shame. Muscle and bone will never be as strong as wire and steel. I'd be more worried about a sudden, evolutionless creation of super intelligent self-aware AI robots before stronk smirt monkeh suddenly becoming a thing.
By the time other apes become as intelligent as us now, humans would've already advanced thousands of years into the future. Humans would just engineer super weapons millions of times stronger than atomic bombs, Or simply genetically revert them back into feral animals.
When my great uncle was stationed in Japan in the 1950s him and a few others would scare these guys with fireworks... Worked for a min then the monkeys started to enjoy the light show lol
If you’re referring to humans we didn’t evolve from monkeys. We share a close ancestor to them (from Neanderthals then going even further back from that) hence why we are similar but not the same.
2:12 STOP, DROP, AND ROLL! It doesn't just work for fire (sometimes). It also works againt anything smaller than you are (usually). The more violently you roll, the harder it is to get a hold on you.
Hey, anyone reading this.Keep grinding ,stay positive, Life is a nonstop journey. Be proud of how far you've come and get excited for how much further you'll go. 🤞🏽🙏🏽!
SIR,I would like it to be known that i, for one, would give my whole hearted support to any monkey or ape, indeed ANY primate, that felt it needed to "come out" or "identify as" or "evolve" into a human being.I CANNOT and WILL not stand by as these creatures are belittled by a callous and uncaring world. SO THERE!. Your most humble servant, Mr. C. Darwin, London, England, This Twenty fourth day of November, MDCCCLIX. VICTORIAE REGINAE : ANNO REGNI VIGESIMO SECUNDO.
I wouldn't be so worried about monkeys shooting guns. The reason is, monkeys are stronger than humans but are way less precise in their movements. They are incapable of putting a thread through the needle hole and also won't be capable of aiming the firearm with precision of a few angle minutes (yes, you gotta be so damn precise to accurately use a firearm).
You do not need to be precise or accurate to kill someone with a gun. All that is needed is pointing in the general direction of someone and shooting. It only takes 1 bullet to kill someone if hit in the "Right" place, and guns have more than 1 bullet in the magazine.
@@Kampos94 Seems you didn't ever shoot a gun. Try to calculate the angle required to miss by 20-30cm from a distance of 25m and 50m (laterally 30cm from center point is enough to miss a human, unless one is obese, umm... I mean "body-positive" ;) ). Assuming you won't do the math, I'll give you a magnitude of the outcome: it's few to several minutes of a single degree. If that's not bloody accurate, then I don't know what is. I'm not saying guns cannot be lethal. But I know from experience that a total novice without skill or training can miss a human-sized target from 10 meters, which to some may seem like a point-blank shooting (so it should be 100% accurate). And the novice still has the advantage of precise finger/hands/arms movements in contrast to a monkey. Please go to a shooting range and find out yourself. It requires at least several hours of purposeful training (which I wouldn't expect from a monkey) to shoot somewhat accurately. Edit: My bad, I took an old Excel sheet I prepared to quickly assess spread on my targets. 60cm spread on distance of 25m is 1,38 degree. So I was wrong by a fold on the magnitude. Still it seems quite a non-random direction for me (definitely not a "general" direction).
I am from India and u missed a major news. In the state of maharashtra in district beed, there was a organised gangwar between langoors and dogs. So the story goes like this, the locals observed this. Once a pack of street dogs killed a baby langoor, and from then the Langoors have gone gangsta on dogs, they were kidnapping small puppies and throwing them from heights killing them, it was pure revenge the local villagers observed langoors taking puppies and throwing them from buildings and high trees, the langoors became so vile that they targeting small children as well. This became so big that forest and wildlife resuce groups were called in they tranquillised two alpha male langoors and some of thier other henchmens and released them in deep forest. I tell u thing is real u can check. Also in india they evolved so much that they also flying kites. Just yt it 🤣🤣🤣 some biologist suggest that they have entered stone age, and ain't going back.
@@catcat7910 tbh I would rather swim with sharks than dolphins, Sharks have a bad rep and can be really peaceful and shy + as long as I’m swimming vertical and keep my eyes on them I should be fine and if they’re swimming to close to me I just have to boop the snoot or swish some water in the gills to keep them at bay. Dolphins on the other hand are too smart for their own good , they can be really unpredictable at times especially male dolphins ;-;
@@cappuccinocappy While shark attacks on humans are much more rare than people think, they do happen and some of them are fatal. There are a small number of people that gets killed by sharks every year. As far as I know, no humans have ever been killed by wild dolphins, not even by orcas (killer whales). There is even exemplars of dolphins that have defended humans from sharks. I have enjoyed swimming with both sharks and dolphins, but I would not enjoy swimming with some of the more dangerous shark speciers (such as great whites and tiger sharks)
@@Kris_Lighthawk yes you’re also right about that , when a shark identifies a human in water as food it’s most likely over. both sharks and dolphins are still wild animals. But you know the things that I hear that dolphins do to their own kind makes me worry what they could do to us , some things I heard are really scary and the thing is , they know what they do, They have the capacity to understand what they’re about to do and sharks are more instinct driven if you know what I mean.
The irony of him asking in regards to the ants, "What's the point in trying to take someone else's spot when you already have such a great one?" Hmm, tell that to us humans. 🤨
I believe it's because humans compete with themselves, ants have also been known to go to war with other ant species, some species also enslaves others.
Bonobos monkey's wouldn't be so bad if they were more human like , maybe they would teach us humans a thing or two about setting our differences with hugs instead of violence.
The one that left the group started his own and actually started scouting out the previous group planning an attack with the others in his new group the old group started doing the same thing and made territories their actually getting smarter and learning warfare
We need more games with other related ape-like hominid species as enemies. Robert E. Howard got pretty creative with his ape men. In relatively recent pop media (especially games), aside from the obvious Planet of the Apes and Conan, I only remember Alundra (a.k.a. edgier Zelda) having ape men as recurring enemies. Hmm... Any other examples?
They aren't Enemies, but there is a whole Game where you play as Proto-Humans and slowly evolve into something closer to us (kind of a spoiler but the Game doesn't go all the way to Homo Sapiens). It's called Ancestors - The Humankind Odessey
Somehow it makes me feel more threatened as a human when the competitors are ape-like or related to us, as opposed to full alien species even if they're humanoids. Like planet of the apes, where the roles were reversed. I guess it's because we're related AND we actually competed long time ago with other hominids, so that fear is engraved into our DNA. Aliens are outsiders, apes are family.
As child I never liked primates I always felt they were human like before I even knew about zoology. Any time I went to the zoo I always felt uncomfortable looking at chimps gorillas etc.
I was told by a government worker that monkeys steal cameras. So I should be protective of my digital camera around monkeys. This was prompted by a monkey objecting to my use of a flash to get a better picture of it from about 6 feet away. I put my camera away to deescalate the situation.
A fun video with some big flaws. For starters, the video just imagines what would happen if apes evolved to a human level and compares how we'd fare/compete. The thing is humans are still evolving so by the time apes reached our current level we'd be far more evolved than we are today and that would have unknown advantages. Secondly, all of the negative behavior the video states as reasons not to want apes to evolve are behaviors humans today indulge in.
You make some good points, but evolution is not like leveling up and saying "more evolved" is a bit cringy. Evolution is simply, a species adapting to its environment. Those with the traits that help them live long enough in their particular environment live long enough to reproduce pass on those traits. It's not about "monkeys catching up to us". There is no reason for us to necessarily gain more intelligence in the future if we are not under evolutionary pressure to do so. In fact, due to technology, intelligence is less of a factor for survival in the past.
I agree with you except, yes humans are evolving, but not necessarily in a way we think. We make ourselves weaker and lazier the more technology we create.
Imagine Chimps become smart as human, then not just use technology but also made their own system of Martial Arts and hand to hand combat, pretty sure even the undefeated MMA fighter can't match
Well I feel you misrepresented the case of India because of which I am seeing some misinformed comments. 1) Macaques by nature are aggressive where ever they live on earth and those places face problem. This is irrespective of their sacred status. 😂😂😂 2) In India sacredness of any creature doesn't mean that you can't defend yourself that creature threatens you.😂😂😂 It just that those animal are taken care of little more than other animals and are not hunted like game animals or harmed unnecessarily like pests. So your point to show the problem was completely wrong.😂😂😂 3) Do remember the main reason for animals and human conflicts is over population of humans and destruction of habitat of animals. 4) Macaques are generally caught and kept out of the reach of population. Only few places face those problems and even those problems become worth while for attention temporarily few times. 5)Like any other country where animal and human interaction are common concerned departments, agencies,etc., take care of the matter.
That whole "we are more evolved" thing is wrong and dumb All animals are as evolved as us, at the end of the day all life started aroun 3.7 billion years ago and all species alive today are the evolved versions of that first life, we all have 3.7 billion years of evolution. We compared to monkeys evolved differently, in our case, evolution prioritised intelligence and edurance while other animals needed to prioritise other characteristics for survival. So no, we are not more evolved.
How come horses in the wild don't get long outrageous neglected hooves like domestic horses? Why is there a difference? We don't see adult wild stallions with elongated hooves?
Copying this from another site: "We all have heard “no hoof, no horse.” So we know that taking care of our horse’s hooves is very important. We clean, trim, and shoe them regularly to keep them healthy and comfortable. But then we wonder about horses in the wild that do not have our help to care for their hooves. How do wild horses maintain their hooves? Wild horses maintain their hooves by moving long distances, 20 to 40 miles (30 to 60 km) a day, over rough terrains. This keeps their hooves healthy by building hard hooves that do not need shoeing and wearing down (trimming) the hoof, which prevents overgrowth. Additionally, natural selection only allows the survival of the fittest. So wild horses tend to have genetically healthier feet. On the other hand, our domestic horses are not always born with good hooves because they are bred for other traits and do not have access to the same environment as wild horses, such as rough terrains and the possibility to roam for long distances. This results in more fragile hooves that need our care to keep them healthy."
There are so many things wrong with the title of this video from a scientific perspective that it borders on impressive. It requires a complete lack of knowledge of how evolution works to even attempt to parse the message the creators of the video are trying to convey.
For a look of what the future could hold with Apes being just like humans, as riding horses, fighting in wars, even making love. etc. In 1968 a movie called The Planet of the Apes with Charlton Heston was made showing what the world be like. 2 additional movies followed. It's a great movie to see what the future might hold.
Places in India and Indonesia. Monkeys have learned to mimic babies crying. So some hotels will tell people to never open their doors at night. The monkeys will cry like a baby. People check to make sure the baby is ok. Once the door opens monkeys ransack the place.
@@spencerrizzatto8188 I simply mean humans, homo sapiens, which are great apes/primates. have already "evolved into humans" and any other ape or even monkey or even anotehr sort of primate who evolves to human-like intelligence will not be a human, by definition, and if all primates who evolved human-like intelligence were called humans, what is the species we are a member of called and how do we differentiate ourselves from vervet monkeys or lemurs or orangutans with human-like intelligence?
Also highlighting that they’re violent and chaotic is just pointing out literally every animal, including humans. The only difference is that humans have developed the intellect to choose how to behave, instead of only acting on impulse. Having said that, plenty of humans do act on impulse.
1:01, imagine being a kid growing up in this part of the world and being stalked by a macaque. When I was a child, I used to think monsters were real. Kids being pursued by violent macaques is some monster shit!
Great to see someone being sensible and realistic about this, instead of virtue signaling. Thinking about this makes me wonder if we didn't wipe out some cleverer species that evolved before us.
Monkeys would not be much of a threat with our intellect for seven reasons. 1. They are outnumbered many times over (I mean, there are almost 8 billion humans) 2. They could not interface with much of our technology (as they do not understand our language. Additionally, our technology was not designed for their physiology, i.e.. cars or body armor) 3. Physical strength is much less important in the modern world (when we have guns,tanks,jets, and ICBMs being 1.35 times stronger and a bit faster ain't gonna do much) 4. Additionally, I'd argue endurance is much more important for covering ground and waging a modern conflict (which we have) than being physically stronger) 5. Apes can not speak even with our intelligence as their vocalcords are incapable of it , which would be a major hindrance in planning and socializing 6. Too aggressive. I don't think they would be capable of working together long enough or in great enough numbers with minimal infighting (after all humans took Melinnia to develop a sound moral and ethical code which we are still working on and is from perfect even though our relative intelligence has been the same for the past few melinnia. 7. Similar to 6. Apes are just not as gregarious as humans and could only work together in small tribes/clans as compared to humans that can socialize and work together in the 100s of million or even billions in case of India and China and if you want to look at things on a more macroscopic level nearly every human on earth can be seen as working together if you count international Cooperation and or participation in things like the global economy or supply lines.
If they evolved to our level, would their genetics also become closer to ours? Would we then all be genetically-compatible? Then, would humans, orangutans, gorillas, gibbons, chimps, baboons, and bonobos eventually interbreed to create a superspecies?
Wha ha! Funny explaining! So in short: They act like humans. -Love to fight for nothing -Being pissed al day -Steeling every thing they can even puppys
This video has so much information that proves that humans didn't evolve from monkeys, and we dont need to prepare for them evolving into humans. We just need to educate our own kind about the wildlife and whether to feed them or not.
"This Is Why You Never Want Monkeys to Evolve Into Humans" Having in mind the thumbnail doesn't show monkeys... I'm going to assume he doesn't talk about Monkeys in this video.
Fun fact: The reason why the monkey attacks in Japan occurred was literally because they were being fed in the first place. Monkeys live in a hierarchical system. When people feed monkeys, they are immediately seen as a low-ranking member of the troop. So, higher-ranking monkeys will always abuse their power & bully the lower-ranking members, in this case, us. Same thing happens wherever & whenever people & monkeys live together, from macaques in Thailand to baboons in South Africa, which are much worse than macaques cuz they’re some of the biggest of monkeys with canines as long as a man’s thumb!
Thank you!! We r traching animals these behaviors
Throughout the whole video, all that I was thinking about was genocide against the monkeys.
Awesome fact thanks for sharing! Makes a lot of sense! ❤️🌹👍
The United States Federal Department of Fish and Game wouldn't allow such things to take place; killing people, stealing small children. An immediate response to this type of nuisance would be to wipe them out. So even if they did get smart and become an eminent threat to the security of humankind, it would be the evolved primate's death sentence.
So we gotta take food from the monkeys? Show them who's the top?
When I was a kid I thought that jungle guerilla warfare meant that people were training gorillas how to fight using rifles. I used to have nightmares about it too.
I vaguely remember thinking that too. Machine guns like on the Vietnam War coverage I saw on TV.
As a kid, I thought that Chinese army does not have rifles, instead soldiers redirect bullets using kung-fu 😂😂
"raven lord" I never got such a misconception like that but I did wonder why it is called guerrilla warfare.
I wondered if it was because people behave like gorillas and hide in the jungles to capture their prey.
Gorillas use branches as tools so they could (with training) wield firearms
I like that idea
Chimpanzees are stronger because their muscles are structured differently. Chimps have more muscle mass in the large muscle category, whereas humans have a whole lot more small muscle control.
Basically, humans sacrificed strength for dexterity and finesse. We have much better small muscle control which is needed to have the nimble finger control. Chimpanzees have difficulty doing small tasks, like threading a needle or assembling small parts. Humans developed this when making tools and weapons.
We continued to evolve more small muscle control to the point we can play musical instruments and many other tasks that require the small muscle control. It’s most likely that our ape ancestors were as strong as any other primate, Neanderthals were far more powerful because they maintained more large muscle mass. Chances are that Neanderthals didn’t quite have the dexterity that our ancestors had.
Maybe that’s why they didn’t make it in the long run. They were certainly able to make primitive tools, but without our dexterity, they were unable to make the more advanced tools our ancestors were able to.
Another advantage humans have over apes is the small muscle control necessary to throw objects in an overhand motion with great accuracy. Humans actually commit a large section of our brains to this one task, it was so important as a hunter because missile weapons are far more successful than melee weapons when taking out prey from a safe distance.
That allowed humans to be able to strike their prey while being outside of it’s ability to smell, hear or see us coming. Chimpanzee toss in an underhand motion and are terrible at aiming accurately.
When chimps hunt, they use only their hands to kill their prey which places them at great risk of injury. Some of the chimps lose their lives hunting because they fall from the trees while chis g the monkeys who are superior climbers
Some may lose their lives to infections from bites from the monkeys. It’s safer to kill from a distance, so it’s obvious why we developed that ability.
The instinct to throw objects with accuracy begins at a very young age . Anyone who has been around toddlers knows that they can already throw toys and other objects with fairy good accuracy, even at the age of two.
Our drive to hone this craft is so strong that we have invented hundreds of sports dedicated to this action, from baseballs, bowling balls, darts and the one that really shows how good we can be would be football.
Thats because the quarterback must hit a moving target. That was an important skill to our ancestors and takes a lot of different small muscles and brain capacity to calculate where the target will be when the missile weapon arrives, even if it’s just a rock. Our ancestors were great rock throwers.
Calculating the path of the running target and leading it with the proper amount to meet that moving target was a great advantage when hunting animals that will most likely flee once the Hunter is located.
In order to evolve to be as smart as humans, chimpanzees and other primates would have to sacrifice their greater strength in order to have the dexterity to build high tech objects. They would also have to learn to control their tempers and aggressiveness in order to work better as a society. Human technology grew much faster when we learned to get along so we could share ideas to advance technology much faster.
Apes would have to do the same, so by the time they’re as smart as us, they’ll most likely be as weak as we are. Our weakness is a big reason why we are the modern societies we are. Once we learned to throw with accuracy, humans became the most dangerous predator on the Serengeti plains.
Being able to strike our prey or enemy from a distance makes even lions and other large predators fear humans naturally. Every animal learned that these little weak apes can injure you from a great distance, so you can’t strike back with all of your muscles, teeth and claws when you’re held at a distance.
They must have instilled this into even their offspring, because nearly every animal on the planet fears humans naturally and will flee at the sight of us.
Once they experience the pain we can deliver from a safe distance, they are far more likely to avoid us. Even our stronger cousins in the ape family learn quickly that we are nothing to mess with.
That was just with spears, darts and arrows, long before we had firearms. The ability to use missile weapons made us a natural for firearms.
It is the same ancient ability of aiming and hitting a moving target, which made us great hunters long ago, that allows us to accurately aim a firearm and even allow for the lead distance needed to hit a moving target.
You repeated yourself a couple times, but this was a great and valuable read.
Thank you!
@@deppjones2682 And how do you know this exactly?
I still can't thread a needle 😔
Not only that, but once we injured an animal we had the ability to chase it to the point of exhaustion. We see this today with tribes running down healthy animals to the point the animal will collapse, the chase can take hours and most animals cannot maintain a quick pace thay long
you could have just said the first part and cut it off bro you obviously have no life 😅😂😂
Look at bonobos. They rarely harm their children like chimps. That’s why it’s impossible to generalise primates as being inherently savage. Each species is very unique. Gorillas are also apes and super strong, yet they have a very high threshold for violence and they don’t often attack people or even other gorillas.
Chimps and the all most undocumented bondo ape ( bili apes) are hyper aggressive
Monkeys is similar to humans they also have hierarchy. They also have poor and rich on their hierarchy.
You should def watch a documentary about them made by disney is really well made.
I watched a documentary where at this resort monkeys would steal alcoholic drinks. Some of them stole no drinks, some of them stole a few drinks where as a moderate percentage would get stinking blackout drunk. It seem to correlate to human behavior indicating that some monkeys are teetotalers, some were casual drinkers and some were skid row drunks.
"You can't do anything about it, because they're sacred animals"
Well, there's your problem. The issue is not really about the monkeys. It's about human decisions. That is the problem. Humans absolutely do have options.
I won't even avoid monkey while driving or even emergency brake on it because my safety is more important
Sacred until you can make money off of their death
YOU can’t do anything about it. But I’m sure other can and has. Just wipe them out, we don’t need them
@@kie-skatemods4141 people said that about wolves, then the elk that wolves hunted started eating the landscapes barren, every native animal has it's place, heaven's if I know what a Chimp's is
No that's not truth those monkeys are in my village too and if they come to unleash havoc we throw stones at them call monkey catchers or use sticks yes they are sacred till they accept food peacefully if they misbehave we are free for action.
To point 2: Ya do realize that at one point in our evolutionary history, _we_ had that increased strength, right? Brains like ours take a lot of energy to develop and maintain, which meant we had to sacrifice something in order to follow our more dedicated tool-using evolutionary path. If there had been sufficient evolutionary pressure to require both the immense strength _and_ increased intelligence, we might have kept that strength as something other than an emergency boost in our fight-or-flight response.
Plus, because our brains got bigger, we had to develop more complicated social structures since our babies required more time and effort to care for in their early stages of development. Comparatively speaking, the babies of other animals are far, far more capable after birth than a human infant is. Most other animals' babies can at least move about on their own within minutes of birth...ours take up to 2 years to do that with any semblance of skill. But even then, they can hardly care for themselves effectively until their mid to late teens! Most other animals? Some can take care of themselves as early as 6 months, for those that even require parental care to begin with!
Evolution is all about trade-offs, and given the advantages of tool-use...maintaining immense strength is hardly necessary when you have access to--and the ability to invent--new tools with which to compensate or accomplish tasks you couldn't do before. It's far more likely that that any other species (on our planet at least) that developed to the point of human-esque sapience would have do so by trading in most, if not all, of their other capabilities in the process.
Thank you for this informative post , I was wondering why he did not bring this up
How does this only have 7 likes
GOTTA GET THE SUPREME TO REPEAL THE BILL OF RIGHTS....WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIDENT ..... ALL MEN ARE CREATED.....YOU'RE ARGUING WITH LAW ... NOT 'THEORY ' .......
@@bobshopes7099 :)
@Jonontoast yep, and more then often the thumbnails are the worst cheap clickbait edits
if they'd evolve into humans then they'd just blend in with us
Nah they will be like orcs more dominant.
@@edge3646 dude, idk why but i kinda agree
@@edge3646 bro the reason they will is because of the stuff you say 😭😭
Facts
No, if they end up evolving human like inteilligence by that time we humans would have evolved too, so they would not blend at all. It is very unlikely it will ever happen because the world of today doesn't have the same conditions that allowed us to evolve the way we did.
Also it would take millions of years or hundreds of thousands at least for other primates to maybe evolve more intelligence... I highly doubt we humans will even last that long.
Humans: Finally, we have researched agriculture!
Ants: That's cute.
You are referring to monkeys and chimps indescriminately. This is a huge mistake. Chimps are not monkeys they are apes and their behavior is very dissimilar. Chimps do not and cannot be allowed to intermingle with humans. A chimp attack would invariably be fatal. While they have been kept as pets while they are very young, it is illegal in most places to keep a mature chimp. While monkeys are intelligent, chimps have the distinction of being nearest to humans in that regard. Any discussion lumping chimps and monkeys together would have to be on primates in general as they share very few behavioral characteristics.
nearist
Was looking for this reply, good job sir! 👏🏿
Chimps have more traits similar to monkeys then not however they are not monkeys like you said. This video is very very poorly put together
we are monkeys apes and primates. these are all steps in the tree of life. just because you are an ape doesnt mean you are not a monkey anymore. just because something evolved from another thing doesnt mean you lose the name of your anchestors.
@@theflyingdutchguy9870 We are primates but not apes or monkeys. The difference is the evolution. We did not evolve from monkeys. We share a common ancestor. Theres a big difference. This is proven by fossils and our DNA.
@@iamposeidond We are apes. Apes are "any tailless primate of the families Hylobatidae (gibbons) and Hominidae (chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, gorillas, and human beings)."
As a chemical engineer I'm actually wondering how it's scientifecally possible to estimate a gorilla would be able to bench press 4000 pounds. You can measure the animals punch strenght and you would be able to guess how strong it is, but I say it's a wild take to say it can lift 4000 pounds. However 1 punch could definetetly 1 hit KO a human.
1800 lbs lifted by a gorilla has been observed and studies found gorillas have around 990 lbs of throwing force vs a humans 100 lbs of force
And do you ingest these so called chemicals, I think a guess of 4000 pound is a fair estimate.
@@frankorobinson1540 My point is it's an estimation and I didn't see how they would be able to have a decent estimation. Also... youtube is no scientific paper. RUclips or natgeo will always take the maxima. If a paper says they estimate a gorilla would be able to lift between 2500-4000 pounds they'll take the maximum estimation value.
Btw. Since oxygen, nitrogen and all the other substances (such as our food) in our atmosphere and on our planet are chemicals ofcourse we ingest chemicals. Glad I could educate you, bro. ;-)
They can't really. It's been stated that gorillas have an un measurable strength. We can take wild guess but there is no true way to measure.
Weird flex but ok.
I died laughing when he said "MaCock wasnt even hungry" and then he kept sayin it. I might be too immature for monkey knowledge. But then again, who named them that XD
1:04
This was what cracked me up.
Ikr. Macock's always getting in trouble. I keep macock's as far away as possible.
your just talking about the cocktail part aren't you lol
That's because he was pronouncing it wrong its pronounced ME CAK.
Trust me, humans are capable of that much cruelty. Many like me have PTSD from such incidents from other humans
Nah they would do the same shit far more often than us
If that is true why no one has ate you and chop you. Feel free to choose the order
PTSD and female you mock veteran PTSD
@@supergobgoblin424 PTSD doesn't only come from war 🤦
Cartel videos?
i often hear ppl say that chimps are stronger as they can lift up to 1,260 lbs with their arms (human wr is 770 lbs) often is not mentioned that for example the human leg is still twice as strong as an arm of an chimp being able to lift 1,120kg (2400 lbs)
That is BS. Myth. These people have no idea how heavy 1000lbs alone is. Most humans struggle lifting 170lbs. This would be like a chimp bench pressing a fucking kodiac bear, (Which can weigh 1500lbs) that are multiple times stronger, larger, and heavier than chimps.
@@wetube6513 were not talking about lifting with the arms tho
so the best way to kill them is to stomp on them before they can punch you
When I was 7
My aunt got bitten by a monkey and a monkey from behind scratched my neck. Luckily, my neck did not suffer any critical injuries and damage but my aunt took a few days to recover.
I highly doubt a gorilla could bench 4k pounds. They’re built more for dragging/pulling anyway, as opposed to pushing. Even then, to see a gorilla at full strength, we’d have to find a way to get them to train the actual lift; which is not exactly easy and thus makes gauging their strength relative to humans a bit more complicated.
I wonder what their deadlift is?
So its OK if we volunteer you to find out? Im not saying your wrong, but if a chimpanzee can rip a woman’s face off and nearly tear her arm off in a fit of rage, Id say a gorilla could break you in half. That does not require 2 tons of force.
@@lordgargamel4124 My thought EXACTLY.
Exactly if a ape can rip your arms and legs off in a fit of rage imagine what a Silverback could do if in a fit of rage ,
guinness world records lists 1800lbs as the most weight lifted by a gorilla. humans top out around 900 (trained obviously), though, a gorilla can throw is 990 lbs of force, where a human would max out around 100
90% of the bad things he said about these primates, humans do those things too. 😅
Just stay alert when you have to take the NYC subway, especially at night.
We are much more, look at the nuclear bomb
True but we don't need them as competition when we already have ourselves
@@scooterbob4432 Or District 8 in Budapest.
@@fransthefox9682 My late Mom and Dad visited Budapest in the mid 1970s and they enjoyed touring the beautiful city.
I love living in a colder country for that. Less insects, animals, vegetation... even less people, it's great!
Finland?
@@krzysztofrudnicki5841 canada
@@marsupialsr Canada is great
You left out that we are the primates that evolved into humans. We are technically great apes. You pointed out now it would be dangerous for us if they suddenly MUTATED (not truly evolved in a normal way) to suddenly have only ONE change... have our brains without losing any of their traits in exchange. That's a parallel to Planet of the Apes.
There’s no such thing as evolution people are created
We're not "technically great Apes" we ARE Great Apes, Chimps and humans evolved down separate branches of the Great Ape tree, We never evolved from Chimp's and they will never evolve into humans !
"Peace was never an option" - Monkeys, the moment they evolve
Evolution isn't an instant process. And with intelligence, it really is a first come, first serve kinda deal. Humans aren't so different than apes. Our entire history was brought up on bloodshed, domination, subjugation and slavery. We wouldn't be here today if those "inhumane" practices didn't pave the way over the last 10, 000 years. And we still do it today, but on species other than ourselves. And why we've abolished slavery and enacted social structures that ban intense violence only in the last 200 years. Only in recent history have we developed so far that we can have the relaxed first-world lives that we do with machines and complicated social structures and resource management at the governmental level and not resort to such wild behaviors in daily life on the basic individual level.
Also: If we see apes becoming a threat to humans as if they were to develop some Superman-esque strength AND intelligence over the next million years, we would put a stop to it. Just like we've done to every other threat, even to our own kind. This is why I said it's a first come, first serve situation. They can't develop on a far off planet out of our sight for a million years and suddenly appear. Not to mention that evolution isn't a one way street. If we need more strength, we can evolve it alongside them and retain our intelligence. Humans are not the apex of evolution. We're still evolving today as we speak. We just don't have a need right now because there's no competition, as anything we need revolving such is done with infighting against our own species with tools and weapons. And we can get more strength even today with said technology. Exosuits can put even the strongest gorilla to shame. Muscle and bone will never be as strong as wire and steel. I'd be more worried about a sudden, evolutionless creation of super intelligent self-aware AI robots before stronk smirt monkeh suddenly becoming a thing.
By the time other apes become as intelligent as us now, humans would've already advanced thousands of years into the future. Humans would just engineer super weapons millions of times stronger than atomic bombs, Or simply genetically revert them back into feral animals.
Slavery didn't get abolished, it just moved to a different system...
@@thedarkdojo5115 Monkey slaves smh😔
You wrote a paragraph there chief are you aiming for a highly liked comment?
Good comment, but please use some spacing.
You explained the same stuff we both as a species are capable of and are currently doing 🤣
U should watch the whole video
I agree we do even worst lol
@Andrynor Ω lmao rape is rampant in primates lmao
@@richabbloger1404 how many have you killed by your hands?
@@richabbloger1404 no
When my great uncle was stationed in Japan in the 1950s him and a few others would scare these guys with fireworks... Worked for a min then the monkeys started to enjoy the light show lol
thats racist to throw fireworks at the native.
@@Pepe-dq2ib you're racist for stating that
"This is why you never want monkeys evolving into humans"
Hate to break it to you but...
If you’re referring to humans we didn’t evolve from monkeys. We share a close ancestor to them (from Neanderthals then going even further back from that) hence why we are similar but not the same.
@@darkii154 We evolved from apes.
@@carinaekstrom1 Yes, hence why I said a close ancestor. I never said that ancestor wasn’t an ape, or was your response to the original comment?
@@darkii154 Ok, it was unclear to me if you meant that the "close ancestor" was actually an ape.
@@carinaekstrom1 we didn’t evolve from apes we are apes.
8:32 the gorilla did better bench press than the Hooman
5:42 - "Humans act this way too! More often than primates!" lol
Who wants to tell him?
Going by the video title, biology is not his strong point...
@@njones420 -"Corvettes drive really fast! Even faster than cars!" lol
2:12 STOP, DROP, AND ROLL! It doesn't just work for fire (sometimes). It also works againt anything smaller than you are (usually). The more violently you roll, the harder it is to get a hold on you.
Hey, anyone reading this.Keep grinding ,stay positive, Life is a nonstop journey. Be proud of how far you've come and get excited for how much further you'll go. 🤞🏽🙏🏽!
Thanks bro
Lion are the strongest ❌
Elephant are the strongest ❌
Orca are the strongest ❌
Monkey are the strongest ✔️
True, they even start using spear now, just imagine monkey intelligent in 100 years later, that would be the real life rise of the ape lol
SIR,I would like it to be known that i, for one, would give my whole hearted support to any monkey or ape, indeed ANY primate, that felt it needed to "come out" or "identify as" or "evolve" into a human being.I CANNOT and WILL not stand by as these creatures are belittled by a callous and uncaring world. SO THERE!. Your most humble servant, Mr. C. Darwin, London, England, This Twenty fourth day of November, MDCCCLIX. VICTORIAE REGINAE : ANNO REGNI VIGESIMO SECUNDO.
I wouldn't be so worried about monkeys shooting guns. The reason is, monkeys are stronger than humans but are way less precise in their movements. They are incapable of putting a thread through the needle hole and also won't be capable of aiming the firearm with precision of a few angle minutes (yes, you gotta be so damn precise to accurately use a firearm).
You do not need to be precise or accurate to kill someone with a gun. All that is needed is pointing in the general direction of someone and shooting. It only takes 1 bullet to kill someone if hit in the "Right" place, and guns have more than 1 bullet in the magazine.
@@Kampos94 Seems you didn't ever shoot a gun. Try to calculate the angle required to miss by 20-30cm from a distance of 25m and 50m (laterally 30cm from center point is enough to miss a human, unless one is obese, umm... I mean "body-positive" ;) ).
Assuming you won't do the math, I'll give you a magnitude of the outcome: it's few to several minutes of a single degree. If that's not bloody accurate, then I don't know what is.
I'm not saying guns cannot be lethal. But I know from experience that a total novice without skill or training can miss a human-sized target from 10 meters, which to some may seem like a point-blank shooting (so it should be 100% accurate). And the novice still has the advantage of precise finger/hands/arms movements in contrast to a monkey.
Please go to a shooting range and find out yourself. It requires at least several hours of purposeful training (which I wouldn't expect from a monkey) to shoot somewhat accurately.
Edit: My bad, I took an old Excel sheet I prepared to quickly assess spread on my targets. 60cm spread on distance of 25m is 1,38 degree. So I was wrong by a fold on the magnitude. Still it seems quite a non-random direction for me (definitely not a "general" direction).
@@michaniewiadomski7911 ikr? Shooting is not as easy as people playing in game, watching other or imagine if it was their first time
I am from India and u missed a major news. In the state of maharashtra in district beed, there was a organised gangwar between langoors and dogs.
So the story goes like this, the locals observed this. Once a pack of street dogs killed a baby langoor, and from then the Langoors have gone gangsta on dogs, they were kidnapping small puppies and throwing them from heights killing them, it was pure revenge the local villagers observed langoors taking puppies and throwing them from buildings and high trees, the langoors became so vile that they targeting small children as well. This became so big that forest and wildlife resuce groups were called in they tranquillised two alpha male langoors and some of thier other henchmens and released them in deep forest. I tell u thing is real u can check. Also in india they evolved so much that they also flying kites. Just yt it 🤣🤣🤣 some biologist suggest that they have entered stone age, and ain't going back.
I remember reading about that and wanted to check the comments talking about it :P
Give them a few hundred years and they'll be in the bronze age.
I’m an animal lover but there are 3 animals that I’ll never want to meet:
chimpanzees ,dolphins and Hippos
I don’t really mind dolphins, but I can’t say that I blame you. Dolphins are WILD
@@catcat7910 tbh I would rather swim with sharks than dolphins, Sharks have a bad rep and can be really peaceful and shy + as long as I’m swimming vertical and keep my eyes on them I should be fine and if they’re swimming to close to me I just have to boop the snoot or swish some water in the gills to keep them at bay. Dolphins on the other hand are too smart for their own good , they can be really unpredictable at times especially male dolphins ;-;
@@cappuccinocappy yeeah! Reminds me of that one time a dolphin tried to drown another person by simply "playing with her"
@@cappuccinocappy While shark attacks on humans are much more rare than people think, they do happen and some of them are fatal. There are a small number of people that gets killed by sharks every year. As far as I know, no humans have ever been killed by wild dolphins, not even by orcas (killer whales). There is even exemplars of dolphins that have defended humans from sharks.
I have enjoyed swimming with both sharks and dolphins, but I would not enjoy swimming with some of the more dangerous shark speciers (such as great whites and tiger sharks)
@@Kris_Lighthawk yes you’re also right about that , when a shark identifies a human in water as food it’s most likely over.
both sharks and dolphins are still wild animals. But you know the things that I hear that dolphins do to their own kind makes me worry what they could do to us , some things I heard are really scary and the thing is , they know what they do,
They have the capacity to understand what they’re about to do and sharks are more instinct driven if you know what I mean.
"If primates became as smart as humans"
Bad news for you. Already happened. They're called humans.
I would have to see the 4000-pound bench to believe it...
Imagine living thousands of years ago,
when Humans were literally at war with other species around the globe.
fighting for the future of the Planet 😮
thats a movie
someone gotta make that
@@eddiewilliams5188 That concept has been used in movies many times and even more so in novels and written stories.
@@obscurelyvague really? i hope your not talking about planet of the apes
cuz yes thats close but not what i mean
The irony of him asking in regards to the ants, "What's the point in trying to take someone else's spot when you already have such a great one?"
Hmm, tell that to us humans. 🤨
I believe it's because humans compete with themselves, ants have also been known to go to war with other ant species, some species also enslaves others.
@@chigstardan7285 And they actually farm other insects too, aphids for one. I find that fascinating lol
@@rosemarysynnott6544 wow, didn't know that! Thanks for the fun fact!
I only know about the leafcutter ants that farm too.
@@chigstardan7285 You're welcome.
Bonobos monkey's wouldn't be so bad if they were more human like , maybe they would teach us humans a thing or two about setting our differences with hugs instead of violence.
Yeeeeeah...........Bonobos are the most peaceful monkee........ resolved issues mostly by having sex..........
@@Mr-Ad-196 yes they do a lot of that too. But they also settle arguments with hugs, then they do it.. but it isn't always to get off
They’d rather start onlyfans, make prostitution legal, and make cheating normal than start fights.
Bonobos are apes, not monkeys! There is a big difference.
@@kentfarmer2911 Apes are a branch in the monkey family tree. So factually apes are a branch of monkeys.
The one that left the group started his own and actually started scouting out the previous group planning an attack with the others in his new group the old group started doing the same thing and made territories their actually getting smarter and learning warfare
Mycock usually gets out of control every once in a while too 😂🤣😂
We need more games with other related ape-like hominid species as enemies. Robert E. Howard got pretty creative with his ape men.
In relatively recent pop media (especially games), aside from the obvious Planet of the Apes and Conan, I only remember Alundra (a.k.a. edgier Zelda) having ape men as recurring enemies.
Hmm... Any other examples?
They aren't Enemies, but there is a whole Game where you play as Proto-Humans and slowly evolve into something closer to us (kind of a spoiler but the Game doesn't go all the way to Homo Sapiens).
It's called Ancestors - The Humankind Odessey
Somehow it makes me feel more threatened as a human when the competitors are ape-like or related to us, as opposed to full alien species even if they're humanoids. Like planet of the apes, where the roles were reversed.
I guess it's because we're related AND we actually competed long time ago with other hominids, so that fear is engraved into our DNA. Aliens are outsiders, apes are family.
As child I never liked primates I always felt they were human like before I even knew about zoology. Any time I went to the zoo I always felt uncomfortable looking at chimps gorillas etc.
We are primates.
8:32 if you can do what the human is doing with 440 pounds, you can benchpress more than a gorilla.
hes extending it all the way lmao
Hes doing 400 pound skull crushers
I live near Philly. I know all about the dangers of feral primates running wild.
I was told by a government worker that monkeys steal cameras. So I should be protective of my digital camera around monkeys. This was prompted by a monkey objecting to my use of a flash to get a better picture of it from about 6 feet away. I put my camera away to deescalate the situation.
Humans should evolve into monke
We fucked up, devolve into monke.
A fun video with some big flaws. For starters, the video just imagines what would happen if apes evolved to a human level and compares how we'd fare/compete. The thing is humans are still evolving so by the time apes reached our current level we'd be far more evolved than we are today and that would have unknown advantages. Secondly, all of the negative behavior the video states as reasons not to want apes to evolve are behaviors humans today indulge in.
apes can be much more vicious. civilization keeps most humans from being as vicious as the apes.
You make some good points, but evolution is not like leveling up and saying "more evolved" is a bit cringy. Evolution is simply, a species adapting to its environment.
Those with the traits that help them live long enough in their particular environment live long enough to reproduce pass on those traits. It's not about "monkeys catching up to us".
There is no reason for us to necessarily gain more intelligence in the future if we are not under evolutionary pressure to do so. In fact, due to technology, intelligence is less of a factor for survival in the past.
@@Nylak-Otter as opposed to the self-hating nihilistic one who will eventually wish the fate of self-hatred and nihilism on everyone else??
I agree with you except, yes humans are evolving, but not necessarily in a way we think. We make ourselves weaker and lazier the more technology we create.
They'll develope empathy along the way, just like our ancestors did when they first go down in the trees.
It is a bit scary how smart some primates can be. Especially when they want to be violent or something.
Imagine Chimps become smart as human, then not just use technology but also made their own system of Martial Arts and hand to hand combat, pretty sure even the undefeated MMA fighter can't match
I’ve always felt that the intelligence of primates is VASTLY overrated
It is, compared to ours. But it is quite high when compared with the rest of the animals.
Well I feel you misrepresented the case of India because of which I am seeing some misinformed comments.
1) Macaques by nature are aggressive where ever they live on earth and those places face problem. This is irrespective of their sacred status. 😂😂😂
2) In India sacredness of any creature doesn't mean that you can't defend yourself that creature threatens you.😂😂😂
It just that those animal are taken care of little more than other animals and are not hunted like game animals or harmed unnecessarily like pests.
So your point to show the problem was completely wrong.😂😂😂
3) Do remember the main reason for animals and human conflicts is over population of humans and destruction of habitat of animals.
4) Macaques are generally caught and kept out of the reach of population.
Only few places face those problems and even those problems become worth while for attention temporarily few times.
5)Like any other country where animal and human interaction are common concerned departments, agencies,etc., take care of the matter.
What's the Point of Laughing??
Exactly. They become aggressive because humans destroyed their natural habitat
If animals were able to speak, what would be the most rude animal?
humans. ofcourse.
I'm still waiting for humans to evolve into humans.
Chimps
flies
Chimps....the facials they make when communicating don't indicate very pleasant words
Mosquito
I'm getting shivers the way that mokey broke the hand and starts eating it. I have actually seen some gruesome content on the internet.
I'll have a bat waiting for those damned mycocks.
The joke is we're already the evolved monkeys
Not exactly, we have the same common ancestor but monkeys are a diff family
@@yellow_flash813 You can’t escape your ancestry, we are still monkeys, and apes, and hominids, and homo sapiens and whatever came before.
We evolved seprate from them.
That whole "we are more evolved" thing is wrong and dumb
All animals are as evolved as us, at the end of the day all life started aroun 3.7 billion years ago and all species alive today are the evolved versions of that first life, we all have 3.7 billion years of evolution.
We compared to monkeys evolved differently, in our case, evolution prioritised intelligence and edurance while other animals needed to prioritise other characteristics for survival. So no, we are not more evolved.
@@spencerrizzatto8188 The thing we evolved from was still a monkey
How come horses in the wild don't get long outrageous neglected hooves like domestic horses? Why is there a difference? We don't see adult wild stallions with elongated hooves?
Copying this from another site:
"We all have heard “no hoof, no horse.” So we know that taking care of our horse’s hooves is very important. We clean, trim, and shoe them regularly to keep them healthy and comfortable. But then we wonder about horses in the wild that do not have our help to care for their hooves. How do wild horses maintain their hooves?
Wild horses maintain their hooves by moving long distances, 20 to 40 miles (30 to 60 km) a day, over rough terrains. This keeps their hooves healthy by building hard hooves that do not need shoeing and wearing down (trimming) the hoof, which prevents overgrowth.
Additionally, natural selection only allows the survival of the fittest. So wild horses tend to have genetically healthier feet.
On the other hand, our domestic horses are not always born with good hooves because they are bred for other traits and do not have access to the same environment as wild horses, such as rough terrains and the possibility to roam for long distances. This results in more fragile hooves that need our care to keep them healthy."
Varying surfaces and the ability to change locations over distance will keep hooves in better condition.
i am 18 btw love your vedios!🥰
There really isn't a reason to not want this since there're already people who are savage like animals
That's why when someone says "Monkeys are cute", they automatically pass as a psycho to me.
We're also pretty cruel to animals such as crustaceans😭😭
Yet another brutal thumbnail from watop
There are so many things wrong with the title of this video from a scientific perspective that it borders on impressive. It requires a complete lack of knowledge of how evolution works to even attempt to parse the message the creators of the video are trying to convey.
Not just the title. There’s bad info all throughout the whole vid.
@ Leo Alexander : Herschel Walker explains it all so eloquently ! Check him out !
"they usually target old people"
*Grandpa casually pulls out a marksman rifle*
Grandpa still dies*
@@thuggceemurdaa grandpa forgot how to hold a gun, and pointed it at his head:(
@@TheTrueBoyal Bro Got Bored
For a look of what the future could hold with Apes being just like humans, as riding horses, fighting in wars, even making love. etc. In 1968 a movie called The Planet of the Apes with Charlton Heston was made showing what the world be like. 2 additional movies followed. It's a great movie to see what the future might hold.
eh I dont think a gorilla could bench press 4k pounds but I do think they are significantly stronger than us.
You are right they can lift about a 1800
i mean its been proven :/
@@itsjackson that a gorilla can bench 4 thousand pounds? It very much has not lol
@@anddudewaslike do a quick google search
@@itsjackson there has been no study or trial where a gorilla has benched 4 thousand pounds. Estimates don’t count.
You have no idea how violent and cruel humans can get.
Most of the primates you talked about were apes.
Places in India and Indonesia. Monkeys have learned to mimic babies crying. So some hotels will tell people to never open their doors at night. The monkeys will cry like a baby. People check to make sure the baby is ok. Once the door opens monkeys ransack the place.
I mean... humans legit dont need to kill elephants
but the ivory of the elefants are so shiny so they just chose violence xD
I can't handle it: Humans *ARE* Primates... we've already evolved into Humans, who wrote this episode and why did they start doing crack this morning?
I know. This was ignorant. Monkeys will never evolve into humans because humans are great apes.
I dont understand what you mean, there could be several things that you mean by that..
Basically if chimps had human level intelligence. Chimps could take over in theory
@@spencerrizzatto8188 I simply mean humans, homo sapiens, which are great apes/primates. have already "evolved into humans" and any other ape or even monkey or even anotehr sort of primate who evolves to human-like intelligence will not be a human, by definition, and if all primates who evolved human-like intelligence were called humans, what is the species we are a member of called and how do we differentiate ourselves from vervet monkeys or lemurs or orangutans with human-like intelligence?
If you evolve for more intelligence, you're strength is penalized as a consequence. The devs say it's logical, but I say it's lazy nerfing.
😂The Hannibal Lecter scene was spot on.
Also highlighting that they’re violent and chaotic is just pointing out literally every animal, including humans. The only difference is that humans have developed the intellect to choose how to behave, instead of only acting on impulse. Having said that, plenty of humans do act on impulse.
"Take a larger primate with you"
_I am_ the larger primate !!
1:01, imagine being a kid growing up in this part of the world and being stalked by a macaque. When I was a child, I used to think monsters were real. Kids being pursued by violent macaques is some monster shit!
BREAKING INTO MY HOUSE AND STEALING MY DOG?!?!! I’m suddenly pro gun
Hahahaha isn't that statement too late... the monke has created the ultimate rock...
I die inside every time he shows a clip of an ape when he says “monkey”
Humans are already slipping into state of major chaos.
Great to see someone being sensible and realistic about this, instead of virtue signaling. Thinking about this makes me wonder if we didn't wipe out some cleverer species that evolved before us.
Even the Anasazi were cannibals.
Monkeys would not be much of a threat with our intellect for seven reasons.
1. They are outnumbered many times over (I mean, there are almost 8 billion humans)
2. They could not interface with much of our technology (as they do not understand our language. Additionally, our technology was not designed for their physiology, i.e.. cars or body armor)
3. Physical strength is much less important in the modern world (when we have guns,tanks,jets, and ICBMs being 1.35 times stronger and a bit faster ain't gonna do much)
4. Additionally, I'd argue endurance is much more important for covering ground and waging a modern conflict (which we have) than being physically stronger)
5. Apes can not speak even with our intelligence as their vocalcords are incapable of it , which would be a major hindrance in planning and socializing
6. Too aggressive. I don't think they would be capable of working together long enough or in great enough numbers with minimal infighting (after all humans took Melinnia to develop a sound moral and ethical code which we are still working on and is from perfect even though our relative intelligence has been the same for the past few melinnia.
7. Similar to 6. Apes are just not as gregarious as humans and could only work together in small tribes/clans as compared to humans that can socialize and work together in the 100s of million or even billions in case of India and China and if you want to look at things on a more macroscopic level nearly every human on earth can be seen as working together if you count international Cooperation and or participation in things like the global economy or supply lines.
imagine a poop-thrower invents nuclear weapons and end us.
The embarrassment would be worse than dying.
If they evolved to our level, would their genetics also become closer to ours? Would we then all be genetically-compatible? Then, would humans, orangutans, gorillas, gibbons, chimps, baboons, and bonobos eventually interbreed to create a superspecies?
Conclusion:'Monkeys would turn into canibalistic kidnappers
The fact y’all said we already came from monkeys to what if is wild
Monkeys did evolve and are still savage toward other people.... we treat them as equals because they can speak.
Drunk monkeys can be a concern 😳
They already have!! Haven’t you all been to Philadelphia or Chicago?
Sounds like they are evolving!
"a monkey drank someone's rum, grabbed a knife, got on to the roof and started swinging it, threatening visitors. 'only males'."
My girl loves it when she gets attacked by macock.
Wha ha! Funny explaining!
So in short: They act like humans.
-Love to fight for nothing
-Being pissed al day
-Steeling every thing they can even puppys
luv the stylized whats up morphed into watop !?!?!
00:55 my brain removed the "ma" part for no reason 💀
They weren’t looking for food 😂
The traps jus didn’t work 💀
This video has so much information that proves that humans didn't evolve from monkeys, and we dont need to prepare for them evolving into humans. We just need to educate our own kind about the wildlife and whether to feed them or not.
100%
But sometimes people want to build their own "reality", which is sad.
It definitely didn't prove that. This video makes a lot of errors in regard to evolution, but I assume it is for comedic purpose
"This Is Why You Never Want Monkeys to Evolve Into Humans"
Having in mind the thumbnail doesn't show monkeys... I'm going to assume he doesn't talk about Monkeys in this video.
They woke up and chose violence