AI powered robotic voice: "CAN YOU BELIEVE THEY USED TO LET HUMANS DRIVE THESE THINGS WITH THEIR MUSHY WET BRAINS AND BRITTLE NON-TITANIUM BONES? TERRIFYING." 🤖🤖🤖
Exactly, the world will have barely any humans left as mankind wiped out and only AI or clone babies will be made, turned into workers, eventually used as "sport fodder entertainment" of which one will be motorsports.
Facts, and if you think about bots/ai in racing games and the way the ai is designed, and the fact that ai racers in games has been around for almost 20+ years , I'm sure they could do that with that amount of budget too.
@@Dtmcbjskok but ai in racing games shift automatically (not ai), follow a human set racing line, rules are taught by humans (like for example yellow flag, the ai is forced to stay at 80kmh, and is forced not to overtake) and u also can't compare a game to real life😂
@@poo48 Yeah, in simulation ai can have access to position l data and you can only get this in real life with GPS or optical beacons. And ai can't be too bad to crash into a wall and then respawn or rubberband to overtake the player - irl is harsh.
@@Dtmcbjskyou dont know what the fk you talking about man, or you're missing lot of deatails on purpose, on the games, the pc creates the environment where the race take places, so they calculate the trayectory and the path, car data, track variables on a closed information environment, they already have all the data before even begins, only adapting to the race itself, in this, the car it self has to compilate a lot of information that he doesnt have when it begins, and have to evolve every second to overcome any obstacule... on trackmanie for example, wind, tyre pressure, humidity, temp of the track, temp of the tyre, engine fatigue, brake fading, are not variables, that is why, even when is an amazing goal are 2 differents leagues of IA
Here’s my take as a robotics engineer. A robot is only as good as its sensors. No matter how advanced the algorithm or how smart the AI is, if the sensor is poor, the robot will consistently fail. Improving sensors is challenging because we're working in a non-ideal environment, requiring a trade-off between reading speed and accuracy. A fast sensor typically has a high error rate, while an accurate sensor is often too slow, limiting the vehicle's speed.
I dont think that Sensors are the big issue here. You could use more than one Sensore for each reading to basically double reading speed. I really hope that they dont go the route where they install track sided sensors. This seems more like an AI development Problem. Racing is a good usecase for AI in my opinion. We could see perfect laps in a few years
@@PWATR I’m sorry, what? Using more than one sensor can double the reading speed??? That’s not how sensors work. You can't just magically double the reading speed by doubling the sensors. Doubling the sensors improves the accuracy of the readings but not the speed. You could even argue that doubling the sensors actually reduces the speed because now you’ll need a sensor fusion algorithm to decide on the most accurate readings. Here’s an example: you want to detect the road using a 120 fps wide-angle camera so it can cover the front, left, and right angles. Another car, however, uses three 120 fps narrow-angle cameras for the front, left, and right views. It's still the same 120 fps, not 360 fps just because you have three cameras. However, now that you have three cameras, you get more accurate readings with less noise.
@banban8481 ??? If I have a camera that takes a picture every second, I could use another one and time it half a second off. This would give me two pictures in 1 second. Of course this is just a simple example but you should get the point. In reality this is of course way harder to achive. But I really doubt that reading speed or accuracy are the big Problem here
I bet in 1 year there in IA races cars will go at full speed with no crashes and perfect lines. But the point is who is going to watch this ? This will be fun only for software engineers. Look at the movies. IA movies looks better but they don’t express even similar emotions compared to normal movie.
I think some info came out that the teams only had 4 months to work/create the software and everything else with cars they have never worked with so its impresive they even got them running
If thats true, then it sure is very impressive how far they got it. Im sure they will get it running waaay better in a year or 2 time. Maybe not full Max Verstappen good. But still very good,
@wyscigowiec4 No? Getting 4 months to work on a car you never have worked on before and developing the AI to a working state is impressive and I think the project will continue
They *are* engineers that have worked on maze solving competitions! The general consensus was they weren’t given enough time to plan and almost no time to test and iterate.
That's still completely different, the scale alone makes everything different just in terms of the momentum at hand, not to mention that the perfectly flat and perfectly clean surface of a maze means they pretty much just need to deal with dust on their tires, while dealing with a real car on a full sized race track they have to deal with hundreds of unknown variables, not to mention other vehicles. It just can't even be compared, especially considering how those maze bots drive and how much simpler their vision to drivetrain feedback loops are.
This is the only thing involving AI that I actually like. It's so stupid, but that's what makes it fun. Watching the AI in the cars trying to figure out what to do is more entertaining than an actual F1 race
@@smipythat AI's gonna be bombarded by tax officials all over the world because it's "parents" came from all over the world, $2M wouldn't even be enough to pay all the taxes, it would've ended up in a debt😂
This is just the beginning, I bet more engineers will join the competition eventually making the race better. I think it's an interesting prospect specially for people like me who are currently doing a major in AI and machine learning and if we can perfect this making cars make smart out of the box decisions this could really be over the top intelectual thriller
this is gonna end up being like the chess scene. AI will end up being faster than human drivers but people will still love to drive on their own and learn from the level of perfection that ai will reach
Its a tech demo... It was so often said in the stream that this is not to be treated like a race, but as live research. You couldnt have missed it if you tried
@@CommentGuard717 generally im also anti AI because it just is used to the detrament of workers, and not in a way that is usefull as a whole. Id be more then happy if AI was used to provide for us and Take away the necesity to work, but its just used for greed. In this case here its barely taking away anything.
@@mateuszzimon8216 Sure, one day. It feels like that they just cheaper out on everything and didn't teach it enough, even AI needs to be instructed like actual racers do (the yellow flag incident for example to tell the car it's safe to go) one day.
No this is the definition of research and technological advancement. Most of the tech in our normal cars have come from F1 and other racing competitions. Same will happen here
The fact that it exists and happened is amazing. No human interaction at all. Pretty wild stuff. I can’t even begin to understand how complex it was to make the car even go around a simple corner at 5 miles an hour was imagine it more than that speed.
Yeah. Unfortunately, some people overlook this fact and just choose to hate and make fun of it without realizing the sheer levels of ingenuity and intelligence poured into this project. Something they can never hope to grasp
@@jaymay7957 isn't that an inference any person can make? A super computer, for example, processes information way faster than any human brain ever can. Of course both humans and AI have different reaction times lol
This was actually an amazing project that I'll look forward to in the future. Yes, a bunch of money was wasted, and they were given little to no time to test and reiterate, but think about what was learned during this process. So much data and information was gathered during this event that will help speed up future projects. This single event will be used as the foundation for all branching Ai motorsports. Ai doesn't pick something up immediately. It takes multiple generations to learn and build on itself. That's why it's called artificial intelligence. It's a dynamically changing entity, not some stupid code.
Nah everything those goat lovers do over there is rife with corruption and cutting corners. They’re idiots who try to come up with grand ideas that literally nobody wants except the prince so he can go “look at this big building that doesn’t have a working sewer system!!” Biggest in the world but they couldn’t figure out how to work out plumbing yeah they’re a bunch of geniuses over there.
Real life B-Spec. I've seen many scenarios like this before. In order for this to work, you are going to need a computer programmer with absolutely no life, and like 1,000 of these cars to learn how to complete a lap.
Yeah, no, not really. That's not how machine learning works. It's all about repetition, and eliminating the bad results. The problem with real cars, as opposed to simulations, is that you cannot simply reset the scenario with the push of a button.
@@SeverityOne Well based on the original comment, that's what they're basically saying. That's why you need 1000 of those cars, because you can't just reset things.
idk lol real reasin making f1 fun to watch is human mistakes if there is an ai everything is completely perfect or everything is fucked up which both of them making it boring to watch i mean if every car is perfect that means there is no overtaking and then whats the point lol
@@Aren12321that's not true. The point of watching AI racing is to see specifically how the humans create the AI. Will it be a certain level of aggression? Will it learn that another car is programmed to do X at a certain turn so the other car will adapt to Y to overtake? Etc. Put it into chess terms. The greatest human ELO score of all time is 2880. And you get some cool chess out of him. You see things you've never seen before. But the highest AI codes rating is 3400+. Being approximately 600 points more means no human on earth can ever beat it for any reason. And when a 3400+ AI plays a 3400+ AI you see some WILD stuff! And yes, one often wins. It doesn't always end in a stalemate. AI racing is the same way. Once physical limitations of the human body are ignored. Once the cars can make decisions in milliseconds and adapt in real time. You're going to see some incredible racing. You'll see things you never dreamed you'd see when there were human drivers.
i am absolutely confident that ai will infact not take over the racing scene because its literally impossible to calculate the optimum for everything when it comes to racing
The simplest facts for the solution is to put magnets on the edge or inside of the track that stand up signals into the car telling us to do different things the same way the old Anki overdrive cars worked then you just have them use an advanced software to know when to overtake it’s not that complicated
I saw a lot of exploding rockets before we successfully went to the moon & back. I trust F1 engineering to be the 1st to create true autonomous driving. Something we all need.
In the first year of the Pentagon's Grand Challenge off-road autonomous (AI) car race, none of the cars finished. The second year, there were multiple finishers, but the pace was somewhat slow.
I cannot understand the point of these races and the millions spent to develop those cars. Everything has to do with safety nowadays. They went to the point where no driver or fans are allowed…
The organisers only gave them 3 weeks i think to actually code there systems for that race, no wonder they struggled.. I noticed the cars kept coming off pretty much on the same straight / corner... they also had drones flying near that corner, i wander if interferance from the hi powered wifi and other signals glitched there systems.
I think people are hating on this a bit too much. I'm as annoyed by constant AI overhype as much as the next guy, but I'm sure it was quite interesting as a research project for the developers and they probably figured out quite a few new things, and IMO that's all it really needs to be.
They only gave the engineers and programmers 2 weeks to work on the cars before the first race so there wasn’t really any proper testing or ANYTHING. This was the first test run on only 2 weeks and when they broadcast it and it was a total fail, the announcers felt so bad for the engineers and programmers because they were set up for failure. Interesting concept but idk what they were thinking in this case..
If you like my content, consider buying me a coffee.♥ buymeacoffee.com/mirosuave
F you and your coffee if your content isn't good enough to make $2.
❌Fastest car around the track
✅Which cars can make it around the track
None
Safety car
Which car can make it around the corner
Naw more like which car can make it past starting line😭😭😭😭
If there was a Tesla autonomous taxi on the race I would bet on it
Year 3024:
AI announcer: The first ever human F1 race took place.
In 31st century
AI powered robotic voice: "CAN YOU BELIEVE THEY USED TO LET HUMANS DRIVE THESE THINGS WITH THEIR MUSHY WET BRAINS AND BRITTLE NON-TITANIUM BONES? TERRIFYING." 🤖🤖🤖
Unfortunately I don't think we are going to make it to that year, however your post made me chuckle 🤭, gratitude 🙏
These are super formula cars
Exactly, the world will have barely any humans left as mankind wiped out and only AI or clone babies will be made, turned into workers, eventually used as "sport fodder entertainment" of which one will be motorsports.
"Lance strolls software" LMAO WHAT🙏😭
*Lance trolls software 😆
More like Daniil Kvyat software
more like Mahaveer Raghunathan software
@@WangMunanFhpsthat was the guy from formula 2
@@WangMunanFhps No, it was Stroll software, ask Ricciardo
Their first mistake was making an ai without training it in a game-like software 💀
BeamNG, by example ?
@@djubigbossAssetto Corsa
@@djubigboss BeamNG uses a point based road system training is not required as each vehicle detects objects in their path.
I suppose they were just too afraid to risk. They should have started from cheap cars.
The mistake was the AI 😭
Job title: "Racing Driver"
Chances of AI taking your job: #ERROR#
🥹
100%
@@ImARealHumanPersonsome wise words right there
@@Neo-fb5ryMore like 0%
Makes you wonder what sensors they are allowed to use because with high accuracy GPS they should not be going off track like that.
"how do we spend a lot of money and make this even more standard?"
"AI"
A lad with a pc: trained AI to play Trackmania better than humans
A whole team at a $2 million competition: can't make car not hit the walls
Facts, and if you think about bots/ai in racing games and the way the ai is designed, and the fact that ai racers in games has been around for almost 20+ years , I'm sure they could do that with that amount of budget too.
@@Dtmcbjskok but ai in racing games shift automatically (not ai), follow a human set racing line, rules are taught by humans (like for example yellow flag, the ai is forced to stay at 80kmh, and is forced not to overtake) and u also can't compare a game to real life😂
@@poo48 Yeah, in simulation ai can have access to position l data and you can only get this in real life with GPS or optical beacons. And ai can't be too bad to crash into a wall and then respawn or rubberband to overtake the player - irl is harsh.
The game conditions stay the same, while in real life the conditions change all the time.
@@Dtmcbjskyou dont know what the fk you talking about man, or you're missing lot of deatails on purpose, on the games, the pc creates the environment where the race take places, so they calculate the trayectory and the path, car data, track variables on a closed information environment, they already have all the data before even begins, only adapting to the race itself, in this, the car it self has to compilate a lot of information that he doesnt have when it begins, and have to evolve every second to overcome any obstacule... on trackmanie for example, wind, tyre pressure, humidity, temp of the track, temp of the tyre, engine fatigue, brake fading, are not variables, that is why, even when is an amazing goal are 2 differents leagues of IA
Here’s my take as a robotics engineer. A robot is only as good as its sensors. No matter how advanced the algorithm or how smart the AI is, if the sensor is poor, the robot will consistently fail. Improving sensors is challenging because we're working in a non-ideal environment, requiring a trade-off between reading speed and accuracy. A fast sensor typically has a high error rate, while an accurate sensor is often too slow, limiting the vehicle's speed.
They seem to have taken analog/film cameras as sensors.
The track itself also need sensors to determine the track limits
I dont think that Sensors are the big issue here. You could use more than one Sensore for each reading to basically double reading speed.
I really hope that they dont go the route where they install track sided sensors.
This seems more like an AI development Problem.
Racing is a good usecase for AI in my opinion. We could see perfect laps in a few years
@@PWATR I’m sorry, what? Using more than one sensor can double the reading speed??? That’s not how sensors work. You can't just magically double the reading speed by doubling the sensors. Doubling the sensors improves the accuracy of the readings but not the speed. You could even argue that doubling the sensors actually reduces the speed because now you’ll need a sensor fusion algorithm to decide on the most accurate readings.
Here’s an example: you want to detect the road using a 120 fps wide-angle camera so it can cover the front, left, and right angles. Another car, however, uses three 120 fps narrow-angle cameras for the front, left, and right views. It's still the same 120 fps, not 360 fps just because you have three cameras. However, now that you have three cameras, you get more accurate readings with less noise.
@banban8481 ??? If I have a camera that takes a picture every second, I could use another one and time it half a second off. This would give me two pictures in 1 second. Of course this is just a simple example but you should get the point. In reality this is of course way harder to achive.
But I really doubt that reading speed or accuracy are the big Problem here
I saw the race and not only i was laughing my ass off i was like 'what did they think what's going to happen 😂'
I bet in 1 year there in IA races cars will go at full speed with no crashes and perfect lines. But the point is who is going to watch this ? This will be fun only for software engineers. Look at the movies. IA movies looks better but they don’t express even similar emotions compared to normal movie.
If they have the technology to put it on the streets, it should be easier on a race track.
@@Speakout555well on the streets you go around 60 kmh, here around 300kmh
They’ve already beat the FPV world champ with an AI drone.
This won’t be long
@@RobiOby-y8y Are u sure? Google "What happen to Roborace", they make better than this
"AI is dangerous,it can destroy the world!"
AI:
its all fun and games till skynet becomes a thing
💯 unfortunately the world is to stupid not to find out
Well... that's some dangerous driving, man.
@@Dr.Mcstaby wtf is dat?
Terminator.@@greekcountryball1
I think some info came out that the teams only had 4 months to work/create the software and everything else with cars they have never worked with so its impresive they even got them running
If thats true, then it sure is very impressive how far they got it.
Im sure they will get it running waaay better in a year or 2 time. Maybe not full Max Verstappen good. But still very good,
The point is that FIA gave them only 4 months to show that it was unviable and to have an excuse to not make a series like this in the future
@wyscigowiec4 No? Getting 4 months to work on a car you never have worked on before and developing the AI to a working state is impressive and I think the project will continue
@@YavkataXD and he's saying the FIA did it on purpose
nice pfp hahaa
Love that they tested the concept on expensive open wheel race cars.. instead of something like a batch of disposable Crown Vics..
Lance Stroll software… absolutely brilliant 😂
Car proceeded to lick windows
Mazepin prob controlling these cars
Why Is everybody hating on stroll
@@canada87699 You have seen the guy drive, right?
Because hes bad!@@canada87699
Tbh this just takes away what racing is the drivers
I think we are safe 😂
You’re right
“Lance stroll software”💀
ChatGPT is for helping doctors pass medical exams, not to revive the spirit of Nicholas Latifi
chatgpt is better than doctors sometimes lol
@@playversetv3877 Some doctors call themselves therapists but ironically don't give a damn half the time.
They need to link up with the engineers that do competitive maze solving robots
Shit will get real quick
They *are* engineers that have worked on maze solving competitions!
The general consensus was they weren’t given enough time to plan and almost no time to test and iterate.
That's still completely different, the scale alone makes everything different just in terms of the momentum at hand, not to mention that the perfectly flat and perfectly clean surface of a maze means they pretty much just need to deal with dust on their tires, while dealing with a real car on a full sized race track they have to deal with hundreds of unknown variables, not to mention other vehicles. It just can't even be compared, especially considering how those maze bots drive and how much simpler their vision to drivetrain feedback loops are.
They'll achieve nothing. Those robots work on a completely different principle. Not even remotely related.
@@Maximum_777 identifying the differences doesn’t nullify the similarities.
"Lance stroll software" got me hard
Uhh, your comment is ambiguous. Did it make you laugh or, well the other one!
It did what?!
Bro I really thought that was F1 manager at the first part of the video 😂😂😂😂😂😂 but that got me
A prime example of all you need to do to win is to show up at the finish line.
They failed at that to.
"the car stopped 2M short of the finish line, we suspect this is because it thinks that's a wall.."
That Lance Stroll joke was ripped straight from FP1Will
nah
Fact: The cars used for this series are a modified version of the Dallara SF23s used in the Japanese series Super Formula.
Waste of a bunch of beautiful cars😭
@@sorosub4562Fr
This is the only thing involving AI that I actually like. It's so stupid, but that's what makes it fun. Watching the AI in the cars trying to figure out what to do is more entertaining than an actual F1 race
So who wins the $2M? The car?
The AI for its plan to conquer human race
@@smipythat AI's gonna be bombarded by tax officials all over the world because it's "parents" came from all over the world, $2M wouldn't even be enough to pay all the taxes, it would've ended up in a debt😂
The arabs😂
The people that designed the car and software. It’s not perfect but its potential can be useful in other areas.
@@NikoKyunKyun having to pay taxes are why it’s gonna switch from “conquer” to “exterminate”
To be clear... this is an Ai voice criticising Ai racing...
They could’ve just used Gran Turismo NPC programming and it would’ve been better 😂
From first GranTurismo
Or Forza
This is just the beginning, I bet more engineers will join the competition eventually making the race better. I think it's an interesting prospect specially for people like me who are currently doing a major in AI and machine learning and if we can perfect this making cars make smart out of the box decisions this could really be over the top intelectual thriller
Lance stroll performance 😂
this is gonna end up being like the chess scene. AI will end up being faster than human drivers but people will still love to drive on their own and learn from the level of perfection that ai will reach
They really made GRID 2 AI irl
“Lance stroll software” had me rolling😂😂
Its a tech demo... It was so often said in the stream that this is not to be treated like a race, but as live research. You couldnt have missed it if you tried
Thank you. This ain’t my favorite thing personally, but holy shit this comment section is thick
It's just anti-AI propaganda. There's a lot of it going around right now.
@@CommentGuard717 generally im also anti AI because it just is used to the detrament of workers, and not in a way that is usefull as a whole. Id be more then happy if AI was used to provide for us and Take away the necesity to work, but its just used for greed. In this case here its barely taking away anything.
Shitty ass tech demo.
“Lance Stroll software” 🤣🤣🤣 that had me rolling on the floor laughing!
Ai can't replace legends who race
Next time hire a guy that keeps making insane AI’s in Trackmania that are beating all the world records
Give the ai time to refine them learning the track and they're gonna be basically trackmania speeds with tas
Are you sure? This isn't first try to make autonomous race car
They was support series for Formula E
@@mateuszzimon8216 Sure, one day. It feels like that they just cheaper out on everything and didn't teach it enough, even AI needs to be instructed like actual racers do (the yellow flag incident for example to tell the car it's safe to go) one day.
But why would I watch AI race instead of humans?
@@Scientist-exe True, it's like... You only watch to gamble or something.
The lance stroll software got me 😂😂😂😂
This is the definition of wealthy people with to much time on their hands
Or in this case not enough time
This wealthy people put their money to future technology. U need to thanks them
No this is the definition of research and technological advancement. Most of the tech in our normal cars have come from F1 and other racing competitions. Same will happen here
@@hustla818 I already know that, it's a joke
?????? This is RnD
The progress of this will be really something to witness
Hmm I’m confused game dev could make race ghost with ai, but a wide open track like this is hard….
“Lance strolls software” is wild
racing is a sport, not a tech demo, if AI could play perfect basketball, people would still watch NBA
The cars look like the F1 cars in Monaco map of Overwatch
Latifi would still manage to Dnf this race if he was in it
Proof :
AI can't replace Humans
EXACTLY
Ai ain't shit
@@josematias1787for now
The announcer is AI
That's not artificial intelligence
That's natural stupidity
Should have one non professional driver just to show how good humans are in comparison
And people are angry that Elon's Tesla hasn't delivered full autonomous driving yet. And this as a confined racetrack with a known path.
They haven't been promising autonomous racecars since 2017
Lance strolls software caught me off guard 😂😂😂
The fact that it exists and happened is amazing. No human interaction at all. Pretty wild stuff. I can’t even begin to understand how complex it was to make the car even go around a simple corner at 5 miles an hour was imagine it more than that speed.
Yeah. Unfortunately, some people overlook this fact and just choose to hate and make fun of it without realizing the sheer levels of ingenuity and intelligence poured into this project. Something they can never hope to grasp
@@BoBo-pl3wwit’s made me realize ai will never have the reaction speed of a human brain.
@@jaymay7957 isn't that an inference any person can make? A super computer, for example, processes information way faster than any human brain ever can. Of course both humans and AI have different reaction times lol
I wonder what would happen if they had put the F1 24 AI Intelligence into the car
This was actually an amazing project that I'll look forward to in the future. Yes, a bunch of money was wasted, and they were given little to no time to test and reiterate, but think about what was learned during this process. So much data and information was gathered during this event that will help speed up future projects. This single event will be used as the foundation for all branching Ai motorsports. Ai doesn't pick something up immediately. It takes multiple generations to learn and build on itself. That's why it's called artificial intelligence. It's a dynamically changing entity, not some stupid code.
Wtf is wrong with you
Nah everything those goat lovers do over there is rife with corruption and cutting corners. They’re idiots who try to come up with grand ideas that literally nobody wants except the prince so he can go “look at this big building that doesn’t have a working sewer system!!” Biggest in the world but they couldn’t figure out how to work out plumbing yeah they’re a bunch of geniuses over there.
At least the F1 drivers can still keep their job at this time
Real life B-Spec.
I've seen many scenarios like this before. In order for this to work, you are going to need a computer programmer with absolutely no life, and like 1,000 of these cars to learn how to complete a lap.
Yeah, no, not really. That's not how machine learning works. It's all about repetition, and eliminating the bad results. The problem with real cars, as opposed to simulations, is that you cannot simply reset the scenario with the push of a button.
@@SeverityOne Well based on the original comment, that's what they're basically saying. That's why you need 1000 of those cars, because you can't just reset things.
“Lance stroll software”😂
L O L 😂😂😂 at who ever thought this was a good idea 😂😂😂
This Idea is good.
The result,.... has optimization potential.
Good idea? No
Hilarious idea? Hell yeah!
Some techbros who certainly have more money than braincells probably
It would be fun to watch this series
Why would anyone watch this?
idk lol real reasin making f1 fun to watch is human mistakes if there is an ai everything is completely perfect or everything is fucked up which both of them making it boring to watch i mean if every car is perfect that means there is no overtaking and then whats the point lol
@@Aren12321that's not true.
The point of watching AI racing is to see specifically how the humans create the AI. Will it be a certain level of aggression? Will it learn that another car is programmed to do X at a certain turn so the other car will adapt to Y to overtake? Etc.
Put it into chess terms. The greatest human ELO score of all time is 2880. And you get some cool chess out of him. You see things you've never seen before.
But the highest AI codes rating is 3400+. Being approximately 600 points more means no human on earth can ever beat it for any reason. And when a 3400+ AI plays a 3400+ AI you see some WILD stuff! And yes, one often wins. It doesn't always end in a stalemate.
AI racing is the same way. Once physical limitations of the human body are ignored. Once the cars can make decisions in milliseconds and adapt in real time. You're going to see some incredible racing. You'll see things you never dreamed you'd see when there were human drivers.
Lance stroll vs ai f1 cars would be funny
This video legitimately made me laugh out loud for real!
And I took that personal
~Lance Stroll
Good Start, hope to see better ones over the time - 😊
It’s like watching someone who’s only had their driver’s license for a month attempt to drive a race car.
In 1yr they will be faster then any human could imagine.
This is actually pretty fun to watch.
Whats the point of a safety car if there are no humans who need to be brought to safety?
That Lance Stroll comment was brutal. But accurate
Absolutely op on the car design for this format, A.I racing in near f1 spec cars is a life time away.
Everyone: ai is gonna take over the world
Me:… you sure about that😂
They’ll get better, it’s honestly a cool idea
i am absolutely confident that ai will infact not take over the racing scene because its literally impossible to calculate the optimum for everything when it comes to racing
Lance strolls software is crazy
The simplest facts for the solution is to put magnets on the edge or inside of the track that stand up signals into the car telling us to do different things the same way the old Anki overdrive cars worked then you just have them use an advanced software to know when to overtake it’s not that complicated
I saw a lot of exploding rockets before we successfully went to the moon & back. I trust F1 engineering to be the 1st to create true autonomous driving. Something we all need.
The star character in this whole thing was the vending machine
Dunking on Stroll is always good for a giggle.
In the first year of the Pentagon's Grand Challenge off-road autonomous (AI) car race, none of the cars finished. The second year, there were multiple finishers, but the pace was somewhat slow.
I cannot understand the point of these races and the millions spent to develop those cars.
Everything has to do with safety nowadays. They went to the point where no driver or fans are allowed…
Rather than Lance Stroll software it would be more accurate to say Logan Sargeant software
Would be kinda cool if they get things smoothed out
“Your scientist were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.” - Jeff Goldblum
Even tho it was a flop it’s still really cool to see and is a lot more interesting than some of the recent f1 seasons
"Lance Stroll software" I'm dead!!! 😂😂😂
F1: Fastest car around the lap
F1 Ai:which car can go around the lap
People dont understand how hard actually is to teach an AI how to drive
This is what the Royals in Abu Dhabi called a hobby .
Nahhh Lance Stroll software is crazy lmao!
The organisers only gave them 3 weeks i think to actually code there systems for that race, no wonder they struggled.. I noticed the cars kept coming off pretty much on the same straight / corner... they also had drones flying near that corner, i wander if interferance from the hi powered wifi and other signals glitched there systems.
I bet this will have a somewhat potential someday
I think people are hating on this a bit too much. I'm as annoyed by constant AI overhype as much as the next guy, but I'm sure it was quite interesting as a research project for the developers and they probably figured out quite a few new things, and IMO that's all it really needs to be.
maldonado's legendary ability was inserted into those ai cars 😂
They only gave the engineers and programmers 2 weeks to work on the cars before the first race so there wasn’t really any proper testing or ANYTHING. This was the first test run on only 2 weeks and when they broadcast it and it was a total fail, the announcers felt so bad for the engineers and programmers because they were set up for failure. Interesting concept but idk what they were thinking in this case..
That one guy with R.C and head tracking 🤑
Micromouse competition started the same. Now it is super competitive.
People misunderstood:
This wasn't meant to prove that ai can race but they were studies and experiments to study ai, just stop misinformation
that defeats the point of F1
ITS A SPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lance stroll software?? NAAAAAAAAAA LMFAOOO
ngl that looks entertaining to watch
Even those toy cars that follow the line you draw drive better💀
Wait so you’re telling me artificial intelligence cannot compete with real drivers? Color me surprised.