The villain meta is here! 🟡🟣 [Disney Lorcana Gameplay]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025

Комментарии • 19

  • @DapperDraBy
    @DapperDraBy 11 месяцев назад +8

    This feels like it does finally have legs. Hades still feels to late but queen of hearts and chernabog really help this out.

    • @DapperDraBy
      @DapperDraBy 11 месяцев назад +1

      Been wanting theses gift box cards to not be useless. Hopefully princess rush with mulan has legs now too.

    • @beardedcat9744
      @beardedcat9744 11 месяцев назад

      Yeah it really needs more hopefully we get some cheaper villains next set

  • @jandewilde4777
    @jandewilde4777 11 месяцев назад +2

    Didn't have to fear the swords against me, was only playing inklands cards for a restricted event coming up soon. 😂 GG

  • @nickv4938
    @nickv4938 11 месяцев назад +3

    I'm testing a amber ruby royal villains midrange deck with shere Khan that can switch between challenging for lore and questing for lore with new queen of hearts. the little buff the grand duke gives helps taking locations out easier.

  • @jonathanmasters8895
    @jonathanmasters8895 11 месяцев назад +2

    As an Amber Amythest fan love all the AA decks you've done recently

    • @WintersLorcana
      @WintersLorcana  11 месяцев назад +1

      They just seem to have all the best combos lately haha

  • @beardedcat9744
    @beardedcat9744 11 месяцев назад +1

    Hey I think this is the deck I shared 😂 Might not be the best but it’s fun.

  • @Pandaman64
    @Pandaman64 11 месяцев назад +1

    Curious why not diablo since you're running 11 maleficent.
    Alternatively, why run 5 cost maleficent?

  • @omarmuniz1497
    @omarmuniz1497 11 месяцев назад +1

    According to the rules, bodygaurd is for characters, not locations.

    • @WintersLorcana
      @WintersLorcana  11 месяцев назад

      I know that haha
      I guess I must have said something that implied that bodyguards would be a problem xD

  • @NickRondo
    @NickRondo 11 месяцев назад +1

    Im feeling having higher than 15 Uninkable card.. its huge risk and it's more risky if you dont have any ways to discard those cards. What should i would do, personal choice btw.
    Remove both Hades Cost 8 + Both 2 Elsa Cost 8 for 4x Jafar Cost 7 ( vilain )
    Remove all Merlin Rabbit or Maleficient Cost 5 for 4x Jafar - Lamp thief ( Cost 3 ) for Jafar shift target.
    I love possibility of interaction between Jafar 7 and Maleficient 5.. Quest with Jafar ( 1 lore ) + Hard Cast Friend/or sing ( +3 Lore + Move dmg from target to opposing chartacter Maleficient passive effect ) + Quest with Maleficient ( +1 Lore ) - Draw card ( +1 Lore with Jafar ) = 6 Lore total.. if you have Queen 3 on play.. it's 8 lore total .. Lets says it's minor Jafar OTK :P

    • @WintersLorcana
      @WintersLorcana  11 месяцев назад +2

      18 is a lot for sure, but most of the deck costs five or less to play, so it's really not a huge problem. But I'd definitely make some changes before running it again. I like to think the decks I play for the channel are all "starting point" decks, so anyone watching can take them and make them into their own

    • @NickRondo
      @NickRondo 11 месяцев назад

      @@WintersLorcana trrueee

    • @kristinaglusick1844
      @kristinaglusick1844 10 месяцев назад

      So how would you tweak this to make it more efficient after playing it??

  • @NathanMckendree
    @NathanMckendree 11 месяцев назад +1

    What was wrong the last play? BBB a fox to replay the fox to take out the castle seems like a decent play.

    • @WintersLorcana
      @WintersLorcana  11 месяцев назад +2

      When you play Fox you have to return a character you control back to your hand. If you only have fox.. well perhaps you can see the issue now

    • @NathanMckendree
      @NathanMckendree 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@WintersLorcana Oh. Duh. I forgot about the mim bounce requirements

  • @Airdaman1
    @Airdaman1 11 месяцев назад +2

    lol I have a very similar deck...