While Reddit can offer insights, nothing beats advice from a seasoned criminal defense attorney. Always prioritize safety, legality, and responsible gun ownership.
Ability, Opportunity, JEOPARDY and Preclusion is how I have advised clients/students when dealing with that/those Speed of Life decisions. Over all, well explained.
I have been listening for a long time about the legal intricacies of the self-defense laws in the US. In Costa Rica it’s all summarized in article 28 of our penal code as follows: Penal Code of Costa Rica. Legitimate defense. Article 28.-A person who acts in defense of his or her physical integrity or rights, whether these be his or her own or those of others, does not commit a crime, provided that the following circumstances occur: a) Illegitimate aggression; and b) Reasonable necessity of the defense used to repel or prevent the aggression. It will be understood that this cause of justification exists for anyone who carries out violent acts against the individual who, without any right and with danger to the inhabitants or occupants of the building or its premises, is found inside them, regardless of the damage caused to the intruder.
One question I have is about ability. I’m older than many folks, how could you gauge my ability? I’m a judo black belt, a combat veteran with training in unarmed combat how could a court reasonably perceive my ability to inflict harm?
If I have an injury that makes it very hard to defend myself does that change what I would consider the threat of great bodily harm or death. For example, if someone told me they were going to beat the h double L out of me I would know there would be very little chance of me stopping that person so I would know that I was going to be seriously hurt or killed. Would that be taken into consideration If I had to use deadly force to defend myself.
That five listed sounds like the five created by a use of force lawyer in Colorado. Andrew Blanchard. I think that's how you spell his name. Has a channel law of self defense.
There was a man in a wheelchair that murdered a man and got caught recently, just because he was in the wheelchair didn't stop him from killing a guy.🤷🤷🤷
So the gist of this is: There was nothing incorrect on the list -- you just needed a lawyer to help you understand it because your reading comprehension sucks? NB: The lawyer had no problem interpreting any of it and did not challenge any of it.
People who own a gun and carry a gun should always have a body camera on them and cameras for their yards,the more video evidence you produce the better your case will be it's that simple
While Reddit can offer insights, nothing beats advice from a seasoned criminal defense attorney. Always prioritize safety, legality, and responsible gun ownership.
Reddit is every extreme of the Internet. Has a lot of great, a lot of idiotic, and very little nuance
I appreciate the USCCA bringing in a real criminal defense attorney to verify these tips, ensuring viewers receive accurate information.
I appreciate they didn't give a 20 minute introduction. They spent less than a minute introducing then got right into it.
Ability, Opportunity, JEOPARDY and Preclusion is how I have advised clients/students when dealing with that/those Speed of Life decisions. Over all, well explained.
I have been listening for a long time about the legal intricacies of the self-defense laws in the US. In Costa Rica it’s all summarized in article 28 of our penal code as follows:
Penal Code of Costa Rica. Legitimate defense.
Article 28.-A person who acts in defense of his or her physical integrity or rights, whether these be his or her own or those of others, does not commit a crime, provided that the following circumstances occur:
a) Illegitimate aggression; and
b) Reasonable necessity of the defense used to repel or prevent the aggression.
It will be understood that this cause of justification exists for anyone who carries out violent acts against the individual who, without any right and with danger to the inhabitants or occupants of the building or its premises, is found inside them, regardless of the damage caused to the intruder.
Thanks for all the informative videos
One question I have is about ability. I’m older than many folks, how could you gauge my ability? I’m a judo black belt, a combat veteran with training in unarmed combat how could a court reasonably perceive my ability to inflict harm?
Thank you!
If I have an injury that makes it very hard to defend myself does that change what I would consider the threat of great bodily harm or death. For example, if someone told me they were going to beat the h double L out of me I would know there would be very little chance of me stopping that person so I would know that I was going to be seriously hurt or killed. Would that be taken into consideration If I had to use deadly force to defend myself.
I love the talks with Tom! Has he taken Mike to lunch yet?
Superb!
That five listed sounds like the five created by a use of force lawyer in Colorado. Andrew Blanchard. I think that's how you spell his name. Has a channel law of self defense.
There was a man in a wheelchair that murdered a man and got caught recently, just because he was in the wheelchair didn't stop him from killing a guy.🤷🤷🤷
👍💪👍💪🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
So many spelling errors with the on-screen commentary.
So the gist of this is: There was nothing incorrect on the list -- you just needed a lawyer to help you understand it because your reading comprehension sucks? NB: The lawyer had no problem interpreting any of it and did not challenge any of it.
People who own a gun and carry a gun should always have a body camera on them and cameras for their yards,the more video evidence you produce the better your case will be it's that simple
I'm sorry. A body cam every time I go to run errands and leave my house? Not realistic.
@@lauradavis2389 or you could have no video evidence to show the court and possibly end up getting convicted of murder
8th, 22 April 2024
Ya. Don't have him back on. He's so pc and afraid of offending his fans. They're only feelings they'll heal. I promise