Hi sports friends! I hope you enjoyed my video. If you want to take another look at the watch, you can find it here: amzn.to/3WCfleh. If you buy the watch through this affiliate link, you’ll be supporting my channel, but of course, you won't have to pay any extra. Thanks a lot!😊
Great and honest review. I have the Grit X2 Pro and it is very nice functional watch. Apart from that the most important for us as athletes is the HR which i could say is average!
Honestly, I don't think more features always equates to a better product. For sure there are some things that V3 and Grit X Pro 2 could have that wouldn't go amiss (a better version of Race Pace that incorporates elevation, akin to Garmin's Pace Pro would be nice.), but if you compare it with the Apple Watch, which is also gaining attention, the Polar products are better value for the sports enthusiast. Garmin add stuff because they can, but there appears to be a chorus of voices that suggest there is just a little too much. Another way to consider a comparison between Garmin and Polar would be: garmin = more stuff, less focus. Polar = less stuff, more focus.
Agree to this, there should be a comparison of eco systems and specific training & recovery features as well. Garmin has more data but Polar gives you more tailored suggestions which is more important for regular runners.
Hi sports friends! I hope you enjoyed my video. If you want to take another look at the watch, you can find it here: amzn.to/3WCfleh. If you buy the watch through this affiliate link, you’ll be supporting my channel, but of course, you won't have to pay any extra. Thanks a lot!😊
Great vid. Love the channel name !!
Great and honest review. I have the Grit X2 Pro and it is very nice functional watch. Apart from that the most important for us as athletes is the HR which i could say is average!
Correct me if I'm wrong please. I know the price is high but its still on the cheaper end of watches with saffire glass?
Yes, that’s correct :)
Hello, what would you do.... FR965, Grit X2 Pro or Epix Pro 51mm?
Personally, I would go for the Epix Pro. But the Forerunner 965 is an amazing choice as well!
At this price point, which do you think is the best option. The polar, Garmin fenix 7 pro, Epix pro or Suunto?
For me personally, the Epix Pro probably. Or Forerunner 965
@@GermanAccentReviews-xn9yx ok thanks for the advice.
Honestly, I don't think more features always equates to a better product. For sure there are some things that V3 and Grit X Pro 2 could have that wouldn't go amiss (a better version of Race Pace that incorporates elevation, akin to Garmin's Pace Pro would be nice.), but if you compare it with the Apple Watch, which is also gaining attention, the Polar products are better value for the sports enthusiast. Garmin add stuff because they can, but there appears to be a chorus of voices that suggest there is just a little too much. Another way to consider a comparison between Garmin and Polar would be: garmin = more stuff, less focus. Polar = less stuff, more focus.
Agree to this, there should be a comparison of eco systems and specific training & recovery features as well. Garmin has more data but Polar gives you more tailored suggestions which is more important for regular runners.