@@jfuent1890 thanks bro. I already buy s1000db, in Indonesia s2000db price 2 time from the s1000db. N when i heard the sound its not much diferent. So i think s1000db is enough for me. With r2000db i dont feel comfort when i listen to it. But its good enough for the price.
@@TheFrankbee I was talking about the r2000db (not the expensive s2000 pro) The s1000db that you purchase is superb anyway, congrats! Im a r2000db happy owner, and in a few days I'm wanna buy the s3000 pro. I'm really excited! :D
@@jfuent1890 yeah i see. Thats why i put what i fell with the r2000db. :) Well s3000pro is exelent speaker. But you need to consider KEF at the same price :) I have no enough money to buy it for now hahahaa.... Thanks for your input my friend. Describe what you feel when you have the s3000pro to me ok!!!
I bought the Airpulse A100's based on your videos and I am really happy with the transparency and the spaciousness at the highs and mids. The tweeters are remarkably analytical and precise and I am rediscovering all the music that I love. Negatives: They really only come alive at somewhat higher volumes for nearfield listening I feel. And I do find that they are lacking a little in the lower frequencies. While they never sound thin, you feel that something isn't there that you get with a bigger speaker on the music which does anything up to a 90 hertz. I did do a listening in the shop with a big subwoofer plugged in and that simply added another dimension. So right now I'm waiting on a sub to arrive so I can try to augment them to create a perfect sound bubble when I am working at my desk. I know the highs and mids are covered extremely well with the A100's. Thanks for your videos!
As my previous comparison between Edifier S3000Pro and Airpulse A100 was skewed due to my mistake (S3000Pro was recorded in "Classic" mode that boosts treble significantly colouring the sound signature) I decided to do a second take. This time S3000Pro is recorded in Monitor mode, which is much more neutral and natural sounding, and in my opinion better represents S3000Pro's capabilities. Let me know what you think about results of this comparison. What it helpful to redo it or was it a waste of time? Cheers!
@@DSAUDIOreview what about bedroom? I like the A100 because they're smaller and will fit on my desk better. I'm not going to ask which you like more. I am going to ask which one is better? Disregarding the bass,
S3000Pro has better bass for sure. but compared to A100 it seems there are something missing between the mid/bass driver and the treble driver. i.e worse crossover transition.
Hi guys, U got the best idea about HiFi testing on planet ! Speaking about sound is to subjective and pointless. If I may suggest something, please change presentation order: 1. Original track 2. First set. 3. Original track. 4. Second set. 5. First set. I think it would be the best way to hear the difference between original tracks and both sets. Keep up the good work and switch on the support channel option !
edifiers S3000 are more full bodied in the bottom end, but bass is considerably slower in its attack. the airpulse have a faster bass attack making everything more cohesive and natural. i prefer the airpulse.
I have both and while I haven't AB-ed side by side, the A100 has very clean and sweet mids. The S3000Pro is harsher. Although in saying that the A100 where I am costs 2x the S3000Pro.
I have both and while I haven't AB-ed side by side, the A100 has very clean and sweet mids. The S3000Pro is harsher. Although in saying that the A100 where I am costs 2x the S3000Pro.
IMHO, this kind of comparison is good but it becomes pointless when it is played back via the internet as what we are hearing is from the source of our own system!
Le S3000 est démonstratif et parfois arrogant mais conserve tout son raffinement. Le A100 est plus épuré et offre une meilleure lecture lorsqu’il y a beaucoup d’instruments. Les deux sont très bon. Le S3000 me semble musical et plaisant à écouter et le A100 est d’avantage analytique et transparent. Tres belle comparaison. Merci.
a80 and a100 sound very different? top, middle, bass? how much are they inferior in sound to the larger model? If you buy a T5 sub to a80, does it compensate for the bass well? a80 + T5 will bypass s3000pro and s2000mk3 in sound?
The 3000’s sound more darker and just a little more closed in. Air100 seem a bit more free and fun, And those highs on A100, so good. I already have dark sounding headphones. Want something bright. I’m ready to drop $800 on A100
absolutely a100 !!! listen to the voice how modern it sounds.so clean without drowning in bass.I wouldnt prefer a100 if i look a studio monitor.because that changes the songs quetly but any reason cant stop me from falling in love with this sound.
could be room acoustic related, but edifier a bit unprecise/uncontrolled in bass. Therefore Airpulse a bit lean. Apart from that both great! *but man, you need to correct your room response! >12 db difference 85 to 120 Hz.
You compared a lot of speakers.. you should also give rating to the tested speakers since you have extensive experience and understanding of speakers.. also update the list often to keep us updated
the point is for us to the rating... there are a dozen other channels where you can here them blather on. This is the one where it's a 100% up to us review for ourselves.
Very very close! In metal head the A100 tweeter sounds slightly better. Bass obviously lacks on the A100 but it's not too bad. I wonder how the A300 would go with bass. The ribbon tweeter is slightly better I guess. But not noticeably.
S3000 more balanced on whole freq, but the Airpulse wider stage and airy high freqs by ribbon. S3000 better for mixing, but Airpulse better for listening music, maybe:-)
The Airpulse A100 is a much more versatile and agile-sounding speaker, but I suspect that the tweeter will get fatiguing after lengthy listening sessions at moderate to high sound pressures. The S3000 is a little less exciting, it seems to me, but much more long-wearing.
2:06 there's a good deal here for vocals and highs. I'm not sure I can tell the difference in either through my current listening source. The bass on the S3000 comes through much fuller though. In the metal head track @ 6:29 the S3000 seems to lose a little in mid low muddiness, perhaps not as quick. Again I don't notice much difference in the classic wood track. Could be my listening source though.
if you are into music, it's a good choice and maybe you'll good to go for years without changing your system if you are contented with its performance and not bored of its sound. As for me I only use the R1280DB w/c I guess the entry level of monitor speakers made by Edifier but still loving its sound w/ a little tweak of eQ on my pc using equalizer APO.
I’ve heard people say that R1850db passes low frequencies even after attaching a sub to it. They say that at least this was the case with Edifier T5 sub. Is this the case with you also. What sub are you using fro Yamaha? What is the cut off frequency set?
It would be really nice if I could hear someone's opinion on the sonic differences as there is only so much a youtube video can tell you? Cannot seem to find many people comparing these or even many reviews for the a100, if anyone has any insight please do let me know.
so, after a few moths of experience with s3000 pro I decided to return to s2000 mkiii. I was so eager to advance to a300, but looks like I can't handle this price barrier in my head, that's just way too much for me and they're not that easily placed in a room which brings me additional business.
Don’t lol I just bought the a300 and they are not that great and I’m coming from s2000mkiii. The a300s are going right back. Very underwhelming speaker.
@@joeyh3291 that's quite curious to read, cause you're not the first to be dissatisfied with a300 according to the reviews. And how would you outline the main differences between 2000mkiii and a300, and why do you feel a300 is not, perhaps, worth its price? I also had 3000 pro and 2000mkiii sound morepleasant to my ear.
@@joeyh3291 and as I understood you're returning the a300s and what's the next model you're planning to purchase? because I don't think buying s2000 mkiii for the third time is a wise idea)))) there's a s3000 mkii model in China, but they're not openly purchased in Europe, but I don't think there's gonna be a huge improvement after s3000 pro...
@@user-on4bj2tr8f as I’m understand it now the bass on the airpulse line isn’t low I also returned a100 recently and the a300 today they both don’t have that boom in bass it’s tight and controlled obviously it has some bass but it you want that loud boom I wouldn’t recommend them. I can’t speak on the a300pro but I would imagine it might be a similar situation. Now the sound on the a300 was clear which was the only thing I liked about it but to me it wasn’t worth it. I spent 550$ USD on S2000MKIII. And to compare what edifier was charging 1500$ I was expecting to be wowed but not even close… it’s a shame. So I’m still on the search to replace my current speakers.
@@user-on4bj2tr8f yeah to me it seems like it’s either the s3000pro or the s2000mkiii which ever is people’s preference. I’m actually thinking about buying the s3000 pro again. Only reason I returned them the first time was because I felt the highs were too overly done but I guess I’ll just download an equalizer to rectify the issue.
@@rajeshjoshi7913 I really can, the AirPulse sounds wider than the S3000Pro through my laptop speakers (for example, the synth lead instrument in Mortals track kinda sounds sweeter and more transparent)
a80 и а100 сильно отличаются по звучанию ? верх, середина, басс ? насколько они уступают в звуке более крупной модели ? если к а80 купить саб T5 это хорошо компенсирует басс ? а80+Т5 обойдут по звучанию s3000pro и s2000mk3 ?
Czy ktokolwiek mierzył opóźnienia w S3000 w przesyłaniu sygnału pomiędzy kolumną główną a podrzędną? Czy czujesz różnicę w głośności grania kolumny nadającej sygnał a odbierającej? Przecież musi tutaj występować opóźnienie (latency).
Napewno w jakis sposób opóźnienie jest kompensowane, ponieważ podczas odsłuchu nie ma żadnej różnicy pomiędzy zwykłymi systemami połączonymi kablem i bezprzewodowo połączonymi S3000Pro. Wszystko działa sprawnie i bezproblemowo
@@DSAUDIOreview Dziękuję bardzo za odpowiedź. A sprawdzałeś może jak to się ma z synchronizacją odtwarzania filmów przez połączenie przez optyka, USB albo rca z np. ruchem warg aktora i głosem jaki jest potem odtwarzany? Czy występuje opóźnienie z audio? Generalnie jestem z nich bardzo zadowolony i nie wiem czy dokładnie wszystko przetestowałem, bo mam jeszcze czas, by je po prostu zwrócić. Czy jednak szukać czegoś z połączeniem "tradycyjnym" pomiędzy kolumnami? PS opóźnienie wynikające z przesyłu sygnału pomiędzy kolumnami wg testów jednego gościa to ok 30ms.
Не сильно круче, по отыграности + - так же, по характеру да, здесь это заметно из за того, что s3000pro в режиме монитора, этот режим самое сильно из всех 4 режимов урезает верхние частоты, поэтому тут они менее острые на фоне а100. Хотя отыгрывают всё ноты полностью. Для дома для компа предположу что для 99% пользователей s3000pro будут более предпочтительны, даже кто тут пишет за а100 уверен при лобовом прослушивании в живую не задумываясь возьмут s3000pro.
@@back_to_life0 Я уже почти скопил на s3000pro, они немного в цене подскочили за последнюю неделю, жду пока опять упадут, в магазине где покупал колонки до этого постоянно так, s2000mklll наоборот упали в цене, я их брал за 30.5к ру. А сейчас они чуть дешевле 27к.руб. что просто шикарно для такой техники, и А100 сегодня упали в цене до 48к.руб. вот стал думать может и а100 протестировать перед s3000pro, боюсь что обратно сдать не так просто будет, они лакированные и только в белом цвете там есть, будут заметны любые косяки, где-то налажаю и обратно не заберут. Интересно насколько отличительно играют а100 от а80, по размеру они не сильно отличаются, а мощность вообще таже 100ват. Басовик на пол-дюйма больше только и всё и ленточник чуть длиннее, что очень хорошо, так как направленность ВЧ излучателя в а80 оставляет желать лучшего, не знаю это беда всех ленточных твитеров или нет, но а80 должны были чётко играть тебе в уши, чётко направлены на тебя и на нужной высоте, повернул голову не так и стереопанорама рушилась, чего не происходило на s2000mklll вообще, они отлично играли в любой точке прослушивания, устал сидеть у компа, лёг на диван и всё замечательно, хотя разница в динамике всего пол-дюйма в сравнении с а80 ну и планарный твитер который похоже имеет куда большую направленность. Что даёт ему огромный плюс. Думаю тут история примерно аналогичная, только разница в динамике уже в полтора дюйма, и мощности более чем в 2 раза, думаю они очень объёмно и глубоко должны копать. Что даст им значительное преимущество при просмотре фильмов и некоторых музыкальных направлений.
@@back_to_life0 А мы с тобой переписывались недавно кстати, вспомнил твой ник, я с другого аккаунта сижу с телефона просто а не с компа, обсуждали R2850db и s2000mklll) Я рассказывал что покупал и те и те и а80, беру на неделю и сдаю, тестируют под свою комнату звук.
@@user-zr8ve6hd4c ) тогда жду от тебя инфу по с3000 , ты умеешь рассказать, чтобы было понятно. Как там будет 3000 после 2000 Почему кстати с360 не брал? Или я забыл ты вроди с351 слушал Всетаки отдельный саб дает куда глубже бас и куда проще его добиться, не нужно выкручивать регулятор низких и включать колонки 2.0 громче. Саб есть саб. Просто читал десяток комментов , что edifier t5 , отстойная гуделка, а вот про 351,360 таких комментов не было, хотя на аид сабы одинаковые по размерам и конструкции
> 10:17 < Frequency Response Graphs
Follow me on:
Instagram - instagram.com/digitalstereophony/
Facebook - facebook.com/DigitalStereophony/
If you have 250$ for bookshelf speaker, what you gonna buy? Please give me the best reference 😁🤭🤭
@@TheFrankbee
I have the r2000db and are NICE!
@@jfuent1890 thanks bro. I already buy s1000db, in Indonesia s2000db price 2 time from the s1000db. N when i heard the sound its not much diferent. So i think s1000db is enough for me.
With r2000db i dont feel comfort when i listen to it. But its good enough for the price.
@@TheFrankbee
I was talking about the r2000db (not the expensive s2000 pro)
The s1000db that you purchase is superb anyway, congrats!
Im a r2000db happy owner, and in a few days I'm wanna buy the s3000 pro. I'm really excited! :D
@@jfuent1890 yeah i see. Thats why i put what i fell with the r2000db. :)
Well s3000pro is exelent speaker. But you need to consider KEF at the same price :)
I have no enough money to buy it for now hahahaa....
Thanks for your input my friend.
Describe what you feel when you have the s3000pro to me ok!!!
I bought the Airpulse A100's based on your videos and I am really happy with the transparency and the spaciousness at the highs and mids. The tweeters are remarkably analytical and precise and I am rediscovering all the music that I love. Negatives: They really only come alive at somewhat higher volumes for nearfield listening I feel. And I do find that they are lacking a little in the lower frequencies. While they never sound thin, you feel that something isn't there that you get with a bigger speaker on the music which does anything up to a 90 hertz. I did do a listening in the shop with a big subwoofer plugged in and that simply added another dimension. So right now I'm waiting on a sub to arrive so I can try to augment them to create a perfect sound bubble when I am working at my desk. I know the highs and mids are covered extremely well with the A100's. Thanks for your videos!
+sub =?
@@Yap_Magnit I got a XTZ 8 inch one in white to match my airpulses. But REL is also a good brand.
As my previous comparison between Edifier S3000Pro and Airpulse A100 was skewed due to my mistake (S3000Pro was recorded in "Classic" mode that boosts treble significantly colouring the sound signature) I decided to do a second take. This time S3000Pro is recorded in Monitor mode, which is much more neutral and natural sounding, and in my opinion better represents S3000Pro's capabilities.
Let me know what you think about results of this comparison. What it helpful to redo it or was it a waste of time? Cheers!
Thank you!
Without a sub, the s3000pro is the best choice for a living room?
@@fontsRealisticSliders-fifa Yes. S3000Pro has great bass depth without any help
@@DSAUDIOreview what about bedroom? I like the A100 because they're smaller and will fit on my desk better. I'm not going to ask which you like more. I am going to ask which one is better? Disregarding the bass,
What is your own choice for music? A100 or s3000pro!
Aaah...great.
I would like to see edifier S360 vs S350. Thanks very much for your work.
yeah .....would be vry informative though s350 is 2yrs old.... don't onow whether the newer is better
This is the comparison everyone wants to see!
S3000Pro has better bass for sure. but compared to A100 it seems there are something missing between the mid/bass driver and the treble driver. i.e worse crossover transition.
Can't wait for this channel to get big and find a way to get a Neumann KU100 dummy head mic for the tests.Keep it up yo!
Hi guys, U got the best idea about HiFi testing on planet ! Speaking about sound is to subjective and pointless. If I may suggest something, please change presentation order: 1. Original track 2. First set. 3. Original track. 4. Second set. 5. First set. I think it would be the best way to hear the difference between original tracks and both sets. Keep up the good work and switch on the support channel option !
edifiers S3000 are more full bodied in the bottom end, but bass is considerably slower in its attack. the airpulse have a faster bass attack making everything more cohesive and natural. i prefer the airpulse.
they are both Edifier
I have both and while I haven't AB-ed side by side, the A100 has very clean and sweet mids. The S3000Pro is harsher. Although in saying that the A100 where I am costs 2x the S3000Pro.
@@ap5672do you have any updates between the two speakers?
S3000 pro in dynamic mode for sure.
I have both and while I haven't AB-ed side by side, the A100 has very clean and sweet mids. The S3000Pro is harsher. Although in saying that the A100 where I am costs 2x the S3000Pro.
To my ears via ATH AD2000X open back headphones:
s3000 win in the bass,
a100 has slight advantage in staging.
I concur using Focal Elear headphones.
S3000 cost nearly half the price of the A1000 making the 3000 a win win in my opinion. Also not need to purchase a sub and saving even more money.
@@pedecia Вы в какой стране живете, где S3000 Pro стоит дешевле A100 в два раза? У нас в РФ A100 чуть дешевле S3000 Pro.
AirPulse is also a sub-brand of Edifier, A100 line suppose to be superior in high frequency area, but they sound almost identical in this test.
agree.. i cant seem to spot the difference either
On metal head song, A100 highs much better. Analytical and more resolving. Listened on my IEM.
the difference is the size , a100 are way smaller and great for a desk
@@deadscene1 A100= 100WATTS RMS, S3000 PRO = 256WATTS RMS
@@rajeshjoshi7913 нормальные наушники нужны)
For my taste A100 has a bit sharper highs that doesn't sound pleasant. And bass response from s3000 is way better.
Edifier S3000Pro👍
Мав s3000pro не сподобалися! Через пів року продав. Звук поганий душний ріжущий на різних налаштуваннях! Неможливо слухати - вуха болять!
For my ears A100 sound more spacious and more sound stage But s3000 is more close up and forward sounding
IMHO, this kind of comparison is good but it becomes pointless when it is played back via the internet as what we are hearing is from the source of our own system!
Love the S3000. Don't need a sub and sound more open. Also half price compared to the A100. WOW what a bargain.
@@user-gn7yo4qn6x in english mate? Just letting you know I paid 550AUD for a pair.
Damn it! A100 is nicer and more transparent! Phil Jones is a good fellow!
I think you would have to do the test with 3000pro in all 4 modes. Every review I have seen recommends Dynamic mode besides this.
Лучше на режиме Монитор или Вокал.
Le S3000 est démonstratif et parfois arrogant mais conserve tout son raffinement. Le A100 est plus épuré et offre une meilleure lecture lorsqu’il y a beaucoup d’instruments. Les deux sont très bon.
Le S3000 me semble musical et plaisant à écouter et le A100 est d’avantage analytique et transparent.
Tres belle comparaison.
Merci.
a80 and a100 sound very different? top, middle, bass? how much are they inferior in sound to the larger model? If you buy a T5 sub to a80, does it compensate for the bass well? a80 + T5 will bypass s3000pro and s2000mk3 in sound?
T5 is 70w rms while the woofer of s3000pro puts out 120w rms each with same freq respnse of 38hz as T5
The 3000’s sound more darker and just a little more closed in. Air100 seem a bit more free and fun, And those highs on A100, so good. I already have dark sounding headphones. Want something bright. I’m ready to drop $800 on A100
Sir, which headphones do you have which are dark sounding?
@@sameermalik5322 I had a few. Right now I have Sony MDR-1am2
@@starg47 thanks, I will try them.
@@sameermalik5322 what visual statz said, were the same person
@@starg47 I didn't understand.
Super curious gor yhe Argon Audio Forte A4 and A5 test. Belief those are made by Dali.
thank you, your work helps us a lot.
Very close call between the two, in my opinion the a100 win but you wouldn’t be disappointed with either.
absolutely a100 !!! listen to the voice how modern it sounds.so clean without drowning in bass.I wouldnt prefer a100 if i look a studio monitor.because that changes the songs quetly but any reason cant stop me from falling in love with this sound.
could be room acoustic related, but edifier a bit unprecise/uncontrolled in bass.
Therefore Airpulse a bit lean. Apart from that both great!
*but man, you need to correct your room response! >12 db difference 85 to 120 Hz.
Everyone Must Have a100 and s3000pro !❤
A100 для музики на комп'ютерному столі,
S3000pro для кіно в кімнаті та для музики на більшій відстані і з більшою гучністю!
都買的意思嗎
S3000 is fuller. A100 have more open sound on my JVC fd01.
CAN DO edifier a80 vs a100?
have a pair of these and love then to bits.. purple are surprised by their sound quality even compared to their sound bars and lower end speakers
S3000Pro. It has presence in the midrange (forward vocals). The A100 sounds flat and boring.
You compared a lot of speakers.. you should also give rating to the tested speakers since you have extensive experience and understanding of speakers.. also update the list often to keep us updated
the point is for us to the rating... there are a dozen other channels where you can here them blather on. This is the one where it's a 100% up to us review for ourselves.
@@aceofspades6667 I agree with you
Yes
Very very close! In metal head the A100 tweeter sounds slightly better. Bass obviously lacks on the A100 but it's not too bad. I wonder how the A300 would go with bass. The ribbon tweeter is slightly better I guess. But not noticeably.
S3000 more balanced on whole freq, but the Airpulse wider stage and airy high freqs by ribbon. S3000 better for mixing, but Airpulse better for listening music, maybe:-)
Airpulse👍 with a couple of subwoofers sound really good
Hello help me 😱. Which better to TV for daily use ? My distance 3,5 meters, Thanks 😉
The Airpulse A100 is a much more versatile and agile-sounding speaker, but I suspect that the tweeter will get fatiguing after lengthy listening sessions at moderate to high sound pressures. The S3000 is a little less exciting, it seems to me, but much more long-wearing.
What the hell is "agile-sounding" and "much more long-wearing" ?
So which one is better in this video?...the Edifier or the AirPulse?
This channel is gold. Thank you sir. 🙏🙏🙏
S3000 pro is best in dynamic mode.
S3000pro for me. Better bass.
Sorry for irrelevant question. Is AirPulse now a brand of Edifier?
Yes
Airpulse is patiented by phill Jones. He has a collaboration with edifier. Edifier is just using the name legally not owning it.
Does Airpulse A100 play louder when you plug in a subwoofer?
The one with separate subwoofer always sound better closer to source than standalone stereo with only woofer and tweeter
When there is written soundtrack on ur screen then we get completely different and better sound can we know what and y
Airpulse sounds better to me. 50hz-40khz frequency range (according to its specification) seems to reveal something.
they're very close, A100 slight better on highs, S3000 slightly better on mid-bass.
2:06 there's a good deal here for vocals and highs. I'm not sure I can tell the difference in either through my current listening source.
The bass on the S3000 comes through much fuller though.
In the metal head track @ 6:29 the S3000 seems to lose a little in mid low muddiness, perhaps not as quick.
Again I don't notice much difference in the classic wood track.
Could be my listening source though.
My setup includes a the edifier 1850s with a Yamaha 8" sub for my small room. Anything else I can add to my set up?
You are good for now
if you are into music, it's a good choice and maybe you'll good to go for years without changing your system if you are contented with its performance and not bored of its sound. As for me I only use the R1280DB w/c I guess the entry level of monitor speakers made by Edifier but still loving its sound w/ a little tweak of eQ on my pc using equalizer APO.
Same Edi's at office with Tannoy TS8 sub (swapped for disappointing Tannoy Mx10). There's nothing more to add :)
I’ve heard people say that R1850db passes low frequencies even after attaching a sub to it. They say that at least this was the case with Edifier T5 sub. Is this the case with you also. What sub are you using fro Yamaha? What is the cut off frequency set?
It would be really nice if I could hear someone's opinion on the sonic differences as there is only so much a youtube video can tell you? Cannot seem to find many people comparing these or even many reviews for the a100, if anyone has any insight please do let me know.
A100 has better soundstage imo
speakers is not like headphone where sound stage is fixed, you can get slightly further to gain some soundstage imo
@@photovideooz4084 if a person is meticulous they can notice/hear even the very slight difference. 😉
so, after a few moths of experience with s3000 pro I decided to return to s2000 mkiii. I was so eager to advance to a300, but looks like I can't handle this price barrier in my head, that's just way too much for me and they're not that easily placed in a room which brings me additional business.
Don’t lol I just bought the a300 and they are not that great and I’m coming from s2000mkiii. The a300s are going right back. Very underwhelming speaker.
@@joeyh3291 that's quite curious to read, cause you're not the first to be dissatisfied with a300 according to the reviews. And how would you outline the main differences between 2000mkiii and a300, and why do you feel a300 is not, perhaps, worth its price? I also had 3000 pro and 2000mkiii sound morepleasant to my ear.
@@joeyh3291 and as I understood you're returning the a300s and what's the next model you're planning to purchase? because I don't think buying s2000 mkiii for the third time is a wise idea)))) there's a s3000 mkii model in China, but they're not openly purchased in Europe, but I don't think there's gonna be a huge improvement after s3000 pro...
@@user-on4bj2tr8f as I’m understand it now the bass on the airpulse line isn’t low I also returned a100 recently and the a300 today they both don’t have that boom in bass it’s tight and controlled obviously it has some bass but it you want that loud boom I wouldn’t recommend them. I can’t speak on the a300pro but I would imagine it might be a similar situation. Now the sound on the a300 was clear which was the only thing I liked about it but to me it wasn’t worth it. I spent 550$ USD on S2000MKIII. And to compare what edifier was charging 1500$ I was expecting to be wowed but not even close… it’s a shame. So I’m still on the search to replace my current speakers.
@@user-on4bj2tr8f yeah to me it seems like it’s either the s3000pro or the s2000mkiii which ever is people’s preference. I’m actually thinking about buying the s3000 pro again. Only reason I returned them the first time was because I felt the highs were too overly done but I guess I’ll just download an equalizer to rectify the issue.
This seems pointless via RUclips but like the music.
S3000 Pro 👍
Hi. What speakers you know does not have this frequency drop between 100 - 200 hz? Thanks
Its his room, all neutral speakers do that in his lousy room
Nice...keep up the good work.
sorry, for my stupid question, why the name / brand of the (SOURCE TRACK ??) was not said thx all and all sorry
download shazam then you know
Is the a100 ok to pair with svs pb2000?
hi, is the edifier a100sub out RCA or 3.5 jack
RCA sub out
pls keep doing reviews thanks
Да блин! A100 более приятно и прозрачней! Фил Джонс чертяга наваял молодец!
I can even hear the difference through my laptop speakers, wow!
Can you? 🧐
@@rajeshjoshi7913 I really can, the AirPulse sounds wider than the S3000Pro through my laptop speakers (for example, the synth lead instrument in Mortals track kinda sounds sweeter and more transparent)
s3000 no question
a80 и а100 сильно отличаются по звучанию ? верх, середина, басс ? насколько они уступают в звуке более крупной модели ? если к а80 купить саб T5 это хорошо компенсирует басс ? а80+Т5 обойдут по звучанию s3000pro и s2000mk3 ?
Да а 100 ярче и чище играют в этом их прелесть если уж камуто будет мало баса сабвуфер в помощь, думаю будет лучше чем напольники за такие деньги. 😉
@@user-gb4tu3ts1f спасибо за ответ, спустя столько времени =)
who can tell me the album and writer of the music "Deep"?
ruclips.net/p/PLvAQtW1hCnr-13tqb-3x6Z3GYGzAV5rKd
Please do svs ultra vs A100
S3000pro
Yeah! more bass and clarity. more exciting sound
DSAUDIO.review pls do comparison video edifier s3000 pro vs airpulse a80. Thnx 🙏
A100 has better midrange, which seems a little scooped on the 3000
S3000
Edifier wins, but is a very close versus.
我覺得聽起都一樣 是不是買3000好
Pioneer Dj Dm 40
iLoud
HI!
... and the winner is iLoud MTM (source) ;)
Agree
all of them don't sound anywhere near the originals. the planar tweeter is just crap.
A100 sounds better to me with a little deeper bass.
S3000pro VS A300pro
Neither neither nor for me.
Czy ktokolwiek mierzył opóźnienia w S3000 w przesyłaniu sygnału pomiędzy kolumną główną a podrzędną? Czy czujesz różnicę w głośności grania kolumny nadającej sygnał a odbierającej? Przecież musi tutaj występować opóźnienie (latency).
Napewno w jakis sposób opóźnienie jest kompensowane, ponieważ podczas odsłuchu nie ma żadnej różnicy pomiędzy zwykłymi systemami połączonymi kablem i bezprzewodowo połączonymi S3000Pro. Wszystko działa sprawnie i bezproblemowo
@@DSAUDIOreview Dziękuję bardzo za odpowiedź. A sprawdzałeś może jak to się ma z synchronizacją odtwarzania filmów przez połączenie przez optyka, USB albo rca z np. ruchem warg aktora i głosem jaki jest potem odtwarzany? Czy występuje opóźnienie z audio? Generalnie jestem z nich bardzo zadowolony i nie wiem czy dokładnie wszystko przetestowałem, bo mam jeszcze czas, by je po prostu zwrócić. Czy jednak szukać czegoś z połączeniem "tradycyjnym" pomiędzy kolumnami? PS opóźnienie wynikające z przesyłu sygnału pomiędzy kolumnami wg testów jednego gościa to ok 30ms.
@@iceberg20mr 30ms opoznienia (die Latenz) nie jest tragiczne (tragic).
Edifier, hands-down.
@@catji9266 Technically, yes, but the title makes the distinction. Most people understand that without the semantics.
@@catji9266 Got it.
How the heck do you compare two speakers using your cellphone's speaker or your headphones?? There's really no point to this video.
amt wins
Верха у а100 прям заметно круче!!!!но баса меньше сказывается литраж и размер динамика, но до оригинала обоим далековато, но а100 ближе))
Не сильно круче, по отыграности + - так же, по характеру да, здесь это заметно из за того, что s3000pro в режиме монитора, этот режим самое сильно из всех 4 режимов урезает верхние частоты, поэтому тут они менее острые на фоне а100. Хотя отыгрывают всё ноты полностью. Для дома для компа предположу что для 99% пользователей s3000pro будут более предпочтительны, даже кто тут пишет за а100 уверен при лобовом прослушивании в живую не задумываясь возьмут s3000pro.
@@user-zr8ve6hd4c 3000 pro , нетт, 2000мк3, да
@@back_to_life0 Я уже почти скопил на s3000pro, они немного в цене подскочили за последнюю неделю, жду пока опять упадут, в магазине где покупал колонки до этого постоянно так, s2000mklll наоборот упали в цене, я их брал за 30.5к ру. А сейчас они чуть дешевле 27к.руб. что просто шикарно для такой техники, и А100 сегодня упали в цене до 48к.руб. вот стал думать может и а100 протестировать перед s3000pro, боюсь что обратно сдать не так просто будет, они лакированные и только в белом цвете там есть, будут заметны любые косяки, где-то налажаю и обратно не заберут. Интересно насколько отличительно играют а100 от а80, по размеру они не сильно отличаются, а мощность вообще таже 100ват. Басовик на пол-дюйма больше только и всё и ленточник чуть длиннее, что очень хорошо, так как направленность ВЧ излучателя в а80 оставляет желать лучшего, не знаю это беда всех ленточных твитеров или нет, но а80 должны были чётко играть тебе в уши, чётко направлены на тебя и на нужной высоте, повернул голову не так и стереопанорама рушилась, чего не происходило на s2000mklll вообще, они отлично играли в любой точке прослушивания, устал сидеть у компа, лёг на диван и всё замечательно, хотя разница в динамике всего пол-дюйма в сравнении с а80 ну и планарный твитер который похоже имеет куда большую направленность. Что даёт ему огромный плюс. Думаю тут история примерно аналогичная, только разница в динамике уже в полтора дюйма, и мощности более чем в 2 раза, думаю они очень объёмно и глубоко должны копать. Что даст им значительное преимущество при просмотре фильмов и некоторых музыкальных направлений.
@@back_to_life0 А мы с тобой переписывались недавно кстати, вспомнил твой ник, я с другого аккаунта сижу с телефона просто а не с компа, обсуждали R2850db и s2000mklll) Я рассказывал что покупал и те и те и а80, беру на неделю и сдаю, тестируют под свою комнату звук.
@@user-zr8ve6hd4c ) тогда жду от тебя инфу по с3000 , ты умеешь рассказать, чтобы было понятно. Как там будет 3000 после 2000
Почему кстати с360 не брал? Или я забыл ты вроди с351 слушал
Всетаки отдельный саб дает куда глубже бас и куда проще его добиться, не нужно выкручивать регулятор низких и включать колонки 2.0 громче. Саб есть саб. Просто читал десяток комментов , что edifier t5 , отстойная гуделка, а вот про 351,360 таких комментов не было, хотя на аид сабы одинаковые по размерам и конструкции
por fin se fue esa propaganda en el medio todo el tiempo :) gracias
Air pulse the unbeatable
!
Both are too bright for me.
Watch Z review then you will know the differences.
Airpulse has no bass
Acredito que tenha graves, mas com menos extensão.
@@miguelmanuel9618 Sim, fiz uma hipérbole
@@Joao_Humberto qualquer um dos modelos é bastante bom
no difference...
A100