Idealism is dual to realism. Noumenal (rational, analytic) is dual to phenomenal (empirical, synthetic) -- Immanuel Kant. Certainty (mind, deductive) is dual to uncertainty (matter, inductive) -- Heisenberg, Kant, Descartes.
In Bergson, Russell himself is prone to a category fallacy. The analysis (or theory) of "irrationals" is not per se irrational in itself. That should be very evident; a fortiori for a logician.
Convergence (mind, syntropy, intellect) is dual to divergence (matter, entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics. Randomness (entropy, chance) is dual to order (predictability, syntropy). Teleological physics is dual to non-teleological physics.
Russell gives an intelectual approach to an intuitive theory. Static analysis to fluid notions. Superficial denial to profound states. He just wanted his Nobel prize for debunking the one Bergson won.
Idealism is dual to realism.
Noumenal (rational, analytic) is dual to phenomenal (empirical, synthetic) -- Immanuel Kant.
Certainty (mind, deductive) is dual to uncertainty (matter, inductive) -- Heisenberg, Kant, Descartes.
In Bergson, Russell himself is prone to a category fallacy. The analysis (or theory) of "irrationals" is not per se irrational in itself. That should be very evident; a fortiori for a logician.
If chance favors the prepared mind, then, Bergson is wrong.
Bergson
Convergence (mind, syntropy, intellect) is dual to divergence (matter, entropy).
Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics.
Randomness (entropy, chance) is dual to order (predictability, syntropy).
Teleological physics is dual to non-teleological physics.
Russell gives an intelectual approach to an intuitive theory. Static analysis to fluid notions. Superficial denial to profound states. He just wanted his Nobel prize for debunking the one Bergson won.
Image, that's what they have been protecting