Locke's Theory of Knowledge

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 сен 2012
  • Chapter Thirteen from Book Three, Part One of Bertrand Russell's "The History Of Western Philosophy" (1945).

Комментарии • 33

  • @JustinRCampbell88
    @JustinRCampbell88 3 года назад +3

    I love his re-evaluations of his own theories. It's good to know that genius exists in many places and at many times in history.

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 3 года назад +2

    Knowledge and Reason; apart from sensual pleasure and desire, significant, thank you.

  • @Quiz.Voyage
    @Quiz.Voyage Год назад +1

    Thank for this...

  • @Boylieboyle
    @Boylieboyle 4 года назад +3

    Really good, clear talk - thanks for uploading!

  • @homerfj1100
    @homerfj1100 9 лет назад +6

    Excellent
    You have to hand it to Russell.

    • @mendali
      @mendali 7 лет назад +2

      that cat knew how to use words good

  • @beverlygrace90210
    @beverlygrace90210 9 лет назад +6

    Thanks for this. Helped me a lot.

  • @langkuai2671
    @langkuai2671 4 года назад +2

    Could you also open the caption. For non native English speaker it would be very helpful. :)

    • @dhieuayuen1467
      @dhieuayuen1467 10 месяцев назад

      Read the History of Western Philosophy #JohnLocke

  • @ROGERWDARCY
    @ROGERWDARCY 4 года назад

    Cause and effect.

  • @nadjiguemar1
    @nadjiguemar1 11 лет назад +1

    Jean-Luc? Like fuck! John Locke? Fucking riiiiiiight!

    • @phuclevan5771
      @phuclevan5771 6 лет назад +1

      Skeptic you have to know that we are talking on scientific problem, here have not sex.

    • @ocholamwanafalsafa8627
      @ocholamwanafalsafa8627 3 месяца назад

      Which drug were you on😂?

  • @ianburnnes-foote2851
    @ianburnnes-foote2851 10 лет назад

    I think many of you have missed the point. And that is why this world exists, and Bruce is so cool.

  • @emile235
    @emile235 9 лет назад +10

    He looked like Jimmy Saville

  • @reaganwiles_art
    @reaganwiles_art Год назад

    Who's narrating?

  • @differous01
    @differous01 9 лет назад

    17:48 ff "Distinct species are not a fact of nature but of language; they are distinct, complex ideas with distinct names annexed to them. ... the differences proceed by continuous gradations.
    The boundaries of the species, whereby men sought them, are made by men. ... This point of view was not generally accepted until Darwin persuaded men to adopt the theory of evolution by gradual changes."
    [Bertrand Russell on Locke's Theory of Knowledge -1945]
    Just prior to this time someone else had other ideas:
    “From where do we get the right to believe, that from the very beginning Man was not what he is today? Looking at Nature tells us, that in the realm of plants and animals changes and developments happen. But nowhere inside a kind shows such a development as the breadth of the jump, as Man must supposedly have made, if he had developed from an ape-like state to what he is today.”
    [Hitler's Tabletalk Tischgesprache im Fuhrerhauptquartie]
    The two philosophies reflect the difference between monism and dualism;
    1. Locke would have us see 'Man' as a subset of the single set 'Apes',
    2. Hitler would have us see 'Man' as one set and 'Apes' as another.
    The former anticipated Darwin, the latter rejected Darwin yet both believed in a God.
    The only way for an individual to move from one philosophy to the other is by saying, in effect, "God is dead."

    • @differous01
      @differous01 7 лет назад

      Raymond Candelaria Was Edith Bratt a nihilist when she left her Anglican God for Tolkien's Catholic God? Star crossed love (Juliet leaving her folk, Luthien losing her immortality) may be deemed nihilistic, but it's also the essence romance.
      Anyone with a heart can relate to that, but if you need a scriptural justification consider how the Bride of Christ is represented; torn between loves...
      www.thelandofshadow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/jrrt-grave.jpg

    • @differous01
      @differous01 7 лет назад

      Raymond Candelaria Nietzsche got the idea of the death of God from Christian philosophy; Hegel considered it a moving higher into the mystery of God, a transcendence. Been there without the drugs thanks, but if they help you..

  • @nadjiguemar1
    @nadjiguemar1 10 лет назад

    MIT

  • @ggggggggjjjj
    @ggggggggjjjj 11 месяцев назад

    ленд-лиз это сохраненные жизни