Inside the Psychologist's Studio with Steven Pinker
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2015
- Steven Pinker reflects on his storied career in psychological science. The interview with psychiatrist and author Sally Satel was recorded live at the 2015 APS Annual Convention in New York City.
Such a beautiful human being. It's always a pleasure to listen to Professor Pinker. He always brightens the mood.
I love to watch Steven's face as people throw compliments at him. <3
Steven Pinker has renewed my hope for humanity. When I become frustrated with human stupidity and pettiness I think about his brilliance. The Better Angeles of Our Nature has given me an optimistic view on the course of civilization that soothes my soul (puts my mind at ease).
Steve’s always great, but Sally did a great job on this interview. One of the best I’ve seen. Concise, intelligent and not overly concerned with being politically correct with every statement you say.
That "short manifesto" he mentions near the end turned out pretty well.
This was wonderfully thoughtful and inspiring. Thanks very much, Steven Pinker, Sally Satel, APS, film crew, and all who helped bring it together. Bravo!
steven thinker
What a thoughtful, serene, lucid, enlightened man! He's almost like an alien or a robot from the future sent to teach us....and then one finds out that he's an atheist, and you think, well yes, what else could he be? What is religion for, again? What does religion give you that Pinker doesn't already have? This calm, content, peaceful man.
by far, the smartest man with a dave mustaine haircut
Loving the intro music, especially the baseline, which I’m pretty sure is taken straight from “Backstreet’s Back”
Insightful, I especially liked traits to be a good writer/ teacher.
Grandissimo 😎
Sorry, I can't help posting this here. The "Süddeutsche Zeitung" is a relatively popular news magazine in Germany. A few years back they had an article about him, the
This is lit
All answers are, yes. Someone get him the play book please.
This is a re post. booooo
He is a good empiricist and Darwinist but like most empiricists today he does not understand consciousness as most scientists, philosophers or psychologists do not, it being described as The Hard Problem. Like most empiricists he is an atheist and approaches reality from that perspective.
4:35