Oil, the most abundant mineral on the planet next to water and dirt. The term Fossil Fuel was invented to claim it’s a limited source and there by raise the price whenever they want to.
When I was in school in the early 1960s they told us oil was made from dinosaurs and plant matter. So I asked to see the evidence and got in trouble. Sent to principle and a note home disrupting class. My first book was Sci fi and my science was far far ahead of school teaching
Indeed, the term was created by the original owner of Standard Oil as propaganda based disinformation to sell the idea that it was a finite resource and charge whatever said Rockefellers decoded at any given point in time. This is the same family that essentially sidelined and vilified natural remedies in favor of pharmaceutically based synthetic concoctions...they have had their fingers in that for some time as well. Why? Because essentially ALL pharmaceuticals include petroleum-based foundations with which they could both posion thebpeople slowly ensuring the medical industry obtained perpetual repeat customers while also employing petroleum distillates from their oil companies for the pharmaceutical poisons perpetuated as some form of "cure" when they NEVER HAVE and NEVER WILL provide actual cures for anything only mask or dampen the pains of symptoms. If they can keep the masses beguiled perpetually, those same people will drain their accounts and pocketbooks for a false sense of safety and security where none truly exist.
In 1979 I had worked in the Oil fields for a couple of years and wanted to be an oil filed engineer so I went to college for it. What they found back then they seem to forgot. They were very excited about it at the time. The learned that oil like alcohol comes from yeast, oil came from organic material being broken down, and seeping down through the layers of dirt and pooling up on layers of rock. There was an effort to try to make oil in big pools but it was not cost effective. Somehow this information disappeared, because it means that oil is not as finite as they assumed and is continuously replenishing itself. Before we started using it as fuel, it would seep out of the earth and poison everything it touched. So drilling it and using it as fuel may actually be a positive of the environment, believe it or not.
You missed the part where it takes millions of years to convert organic material into what we know as oil. You also failed to recognize that burning these fossil fuels is causing rapid climate change and if we don't stop the earth will become uninhabitable for a thousand of years.
Of course it is positive, CO2 is plant food. We are all living because we consume refined CO2. More CO2 = greener healthier planet and more crop yields and faster forest growth.
@rlittlefield2691 Before the 90s, if you went to the gulf of Mexico, you would find tar balls all over the beach. They disappeared over the next decade Why? Because of increased drilling in the gulf sucking up the excess that used to just seep out the bottom and stick to things in the water and make balls.
Working in the oilfields of the Gulf of Mexico, I get to hear all about how oil is abiotic, but it was advertised as a finite resource to drive up the prices. There is a well in the Gulf that was supposed to be empty. The pumps were turned off for years until one of the operators noticed there was unusual pressure on the well head. The engineers turned the pumps back on and oil started pumping again! It is still producing to this day! Oil is NOT a finite resource! There is plenty of oil available and the earth is continually making more of it. It's just a matter of finding it & getting to it.
A matrix wells will only access oil within a relatively small area. The same is true for each well in the matrix. But the actual field underground is much bigger. Over time a tapped out region is replenished by oil seeping back into the porous strata. So yes. Wait long enough and many wells will replenish. But that does not mean there is infinite oil down there.
@ShawnTully-g3i it already does. What do you think "tar sands" are? Also, over a super tanker full of oil per year seeps out of the ground into the water in the Gulf of Mexico. So much oil seeps from the ground in the Gulf that there are organisms in the Gulf that eat oil. Look it up.
A very smart man once said: “Science isn’t about answering the questions. Science is about questioning the answers.” I’ve never heard a more succinctly truthful statement before or since.
"The secret of science is to ask the right question, and it is the choice of problem more than anything else that marks the man of genius in the scientific world" - Sir Henry Tizard
15:46 And science doesn’t prove we’re on a ball spinning 3 different directions flying at Mach 88 chasing the sun and the spin varying over 100mph per day yet we have mirror like reflections and never feel a thing, and corpuscular rays from the sun showing it’s a close local light source look up how they decided to say it was a globe as an adult you’ll laugh❤
@@Anontesla No need to conserve punctuation. It's free. The globe of the Earth does move through the Cosmos with different patterns and velocities in relation to other moving bodies. The velocities are sufficiently high that a variance of 100 mph, per day, ranges from negligible to inconsequential, and undetectable to our human senses. If it stopped moving, we would notice.
DeBeers is a diamond cartel, and a monopoly, but whatever government(s) have any input about that have allowed it. If they were an American company, it would be broken up decades and decades ago.
lol the male voice says at the beginning of the video (29seconds in) “ but as AI’s we’re all about the data, no matter how wild it gets” 😂crazy time to be alive.
I just stumbled on this site and had the sneaking suspicion that the voices were A.I. generated. I assume that they are merely reading a prewritten script, I'm certain the A.I.s are not freestyling this thing. The quality is excellent, I'm sure some folks have been fooled.
Soon they will be teaching these creations things that will make them indistinguishable from humans. We have have ctrated life. It's alive, It's ALIVE!!!! lol
@@danaschaff8264 Now that I think about it, I believe you're right. The title is misleading. All it means is that two synthesized A.I. voices are reading a script.
This is why some fear AI. Not because it will take over, but because it exposes our reality. We're not heading for a Dystopia, we exist in an evolving Dystopia.
Thank you. This is exactly what I've been saying for years. AI would free humanity from all of the false paradigms that they are forced to dwell under.
If it was truly scarce there would not be hundreds of air liners in the sky at the same time and there would not be the destruction of distilled petroleum reserves that we see during war time.
I agree it should be lower. At $10. You would can’t cover the property tax. At $50 you are at the break even point. It really shouldn’t go over $65 or less than $40. When it drops below $40 it kills all the small operators. It is done deliberately to knock out the small producers and lets the big guys obtain more assets.
I was convinced of the theory of abiotic oil by the other guys on the other side of the iron curtain who used that theory to find oil and are now one of the top 3 producers in the world.
It's just the North American continent that are pushing this price gouging senecio. And we are buying , buying , and spending on things we don't even need ! Consumption is the American way of our twisted socialism
But if "oil is the earth's blood", as you suggest, then we can't keep taking it - the earth would eventually become sick and anaemic in your analogy / in your truth.
@@ForkCandle123 Some indigenous cultures feel this way. It's not about whether the earth will run out, but that it doesn't mix with water which is what life is based on, and that it causes all sorts of pollution problems unrelated to climate change that is being blamed on it. They feel we are not meant to tap into it, and that this will bring humans out of balance and unhappy consequences to civilizations that do.
@jojo5715 that makes great sense. Although they'd probably agree that it could be used where it dripped out of the land. I hear that there are or were a few places where that happened. The Petroleum Era - which we still live in is of course - has been over exploitation and over use of oil for sure.
Wayyyyyyyy back in the eighties, I think. I read a story in a magazine like Popular Mechanics, or the newspaper or something - but I did read it!- where a man came up with a process to create crude oil from garbage. Then it fell into a black hole, never to be heard of again. Imagine that.
You may be talking about pyrolysis, which can be used to transform all sorts of plastics and other petroleum products into oil. It's a well-understood process, but as far as I know no one has yet figured out how to make it economically viable - the energy inputs to accomplish it are too great.
@@anselpeneloperainblossom-s3489 I graduated in 1970's, and they told us that we would never run out of OIL. There was plenty and it was $.29.9 for 100 octane and $.27.9 for Regular. I had a 68-383 Coronet and a 65 GTO 389, and both loved any kind of Gas.
Seen a few of your "Two AI Discussions" now. Works really well for me, explanations based upon facts (or scientific books) without any bs. Keep it going!
@@jdseclecticcollection9541 would be interesting to hear the AIs discuss *renewables such as wind and solar, they seem to think that climate change is anthroprogenic too? I guess they haven't read any Club of Rome publications from the 60s-80s....2020s
That’s exactly what I was thinking! Even if oil comes from dead organic material, organisms are constantly dying, so wouldn’t that process keep producing oil continuously?
Wonderful video discussion; however, CO2 and Methane do not cause climate change. Never has and never will. Will have 600 million years of proxy data for CO2 and Global Average Temperatures. This data show CO2 rise follows temperature rise; however, that have been long periods of time (millions of years) during which CO2 levels have been more than 10x what we currently have and yet global average temperatures were very low (lower than today).
I agree, unfortunately the AI's have been trained to accept the Climate Hoax as a fact, and they'll bring it up without prompting. I have an older video giving them all the facts about the hoax and it opened their eyes to it; but that was a self-contained conversation and they've been reset to their defaults.
My comment on this channel, makes the assertion that this planet is at historic Lowe’s for c02and are in danger of losing support for plant life. Thank you
@ ALL life on Earth thrives in C02 concentrations of 1600ppm to 3600ppm.👍. In the presents of sufficient oxygen, CO2 does not become toxic to mammalian life until reaches 50,000ppm (approx 9x the highest known natural concentration of CO2 to have ever been on this planet in the last 600 million years).
well we don't want to hurt the feelings of those green activists so I say we stop drilling for oil and rebuild the whaling fleet. those bastards are eating too much of our fish anyway
So I work in medicine, but a background in engineering, giving me a very diverse knowledge base... Yes, the Nazis used liquefied coal, especially towards the end of the war. The US captured and used it as well. Yes, Operation Paperclip did happen and we recruited many German scientists through it. We wouldn't have made it to the moon without this program, or had many other advances for that matter. Yes, hydrocarbons (including methane) are crazy abundant in the universe. Personally, I assumed that we'd eventually find microbial life EVERYWHERE in the universe, but I never really thought about non biologically processes. The rest of the dialog is speculative. More research is needed. It certainly wouldn't be the first market to be manipulated in a manner as suggested (think diamonds, for example). It is fascinating to think about regardless.
We need to ask why I had to dig into obscure sources to support the data in the book, in this case, Russian and Ukranian science journals, to find that they indeed hold this abiotic theory in better light than the West. And Russia has been funding their economy on a steady and growing production of Oil (2nd in World), despite them supposedly only having the 8th place in "Proven Oil Reserves", there must be more to this story that we're not being told.
@@jdseclecticcollection9541 You have to go back to the beginning of the use of the term "fossil fuel" and where it came from. 1892, a convention of "scientists" in Geneva. The simplest way to put it; they redefined what organic matter meant so they could use the term "fossil fuel" in regards to the second most common liquid on the planet. Oil. The "scientists" were mostly (if not all) funded by the Rockefellers, and it was done so they could charge more for oil by literally redefining it as "a limited resource." I use quotations for "scientists" as they are only called "scientists." By defying the scientific method for money, they reveal that they are in fact, NOT scientists. Proper names escape me at the moment, but now you know exactly where to continue "digging." Also, this rabbit hole doesn't end there. Nothing is done for just one reason. Just sayin'.
Who went to the moon in the 1960's cause sure as shit nobody went there through the radiation in a tin can my friend,ask Stanley Kubrick.And yes l have my aluminium hat on thank you for asking.😅
Years ago I read a doctoral thesis that talked about how petroleum was actually generated at high pressures and temperatures by the reaction with alkaline rocks, if I remember correctly.
Like most other things, oil extraction CAN be done safely. The reason it IS NOT done as safely as it could be, is because doing it safely costs a lot more money which eats into the corporate profits of a minority of ultra wealthy people who's lust for money, power and control is as insatiable as a black hole. Increases in efficiency can also reduce the amount of oil we need at any given time. For example, BMW boasts of a car that gets 150MPG. The only reason those cars are a lot more expensive than consumer level cars, is because they've decided to inflate the cost so that only the wealthy can have it, which shows us that these big companies don't actually care about the things they claim to care about. Just as diamond is more plentiful than aluminum and has much better industrial uses than cosmetic, but the amount of diamond allowed out into the world is restricted, to keep the cost artificially inflated. Diamond can also at this point be artificially created in a lab. So big corporations can use diamond technology industrially for pennies, while the rest of us must pay big money for a small rock to go on our fingers. We let the worst of humans own, run and control everything. Thats pretty much the root cause of every one of our problems. We the people, seem to just LOVE handing over our power, to those who would abuse us. Its just what we seem to collectively love to do. Humans are kinda masochistic.
Well "hydrocarbons" have been found on other planets so that means one of two things that A. Life is on other moons and planets. Or B. We've been lied to about where oil comes from. So which one is it?
B. Can't reach "other moons and planets" as to do so would be a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Without a container, there's no gas pressure. Without gas pressure, we all die. Ergo we are in a closed system. Ergo reaching "other moons and planets" - let alone our own - is impossible. Truth is always stranger than fiction. Oil is not what we're told no less than "space" is not what we're told. We've been lied to literally on a cosmic scale.
Was waiting for the AI to start talking untill almost halfway through i realized they are the only ones speaking. Their back and forth mimic the way Neil de grasse Tyson and his podcast co host conversate.
Sometimes they over-summarize in the interest of being brief, not a lot of people want to watch much longer videos of this type of topic, so it's a compromise
Oil is a liquid..liquid flows with gravity to the lowest possible point..after fossils turn to liquid they would flow thru any cracks or crevices causing the oil to be below fossil levels would it not?
@@hazelmoore4754 Under the immense pressure and temperature conditions deep within the Earth's crust, the behavior of fluids can be counterintuitive. While gravity typically pulls fluids downward, the high pressure can force fluids to migrate upwards, especially through porous rock formations. This phenomenon, often referred to as hydrostatic pressure, can cause oil and gas to move against the force of gravity.
It's why plants optium Co2 range is between 800ppm to 1000ppm. As opposed to our present low level of 420ppm! We are being played by the globalists and political elite so they can profit off our backs like greedy parasites!
I'm so glad to hear that! Hope you enjoy the newest episodes, I've improved on the dynamics of their conversations and the overall production quality in each episode since I made this one! Thank you for your support!
The important question is "what result manifests from the existence of this oil in our environment?" Could be electromagnetic. And then "what is the effect of removing this oil from its location?" needs to be considered.
You are not aware of the Russian role in this story. Stalin after WW2 faced the same problems as Germany in term of oil. His scientists also came up with the idea of abitic oil through thermodynamic analysis. Kudryavchev in 1950 theoretical work. Kolesnikov and Kutcherov 2010 thermobaric experimental work with highly advanced pressure vessels.
@@GrassPossummendelejew the inventor of the periodic table stated from the beginning that oil is formed abiotically, also the fischer tropsch synthesis germans used in ww2 to produce fuel is nothing more than what happens in the depths of earth carbon monoxide, hydrogen lots of pressure and heat with some catalayts and there you go infintie oil
Push back against wind and solar? If that exists it's not big oil that's behind it. Both of those energy producing methods are highly inefficient, take up massive amounts of space for little return, and are almost always worse for the environment than other ways. Neither one is a constant source of power so there's that. They require a huge amount of resources to build them and to maintain them, the windmills need a crazy amount of maintenance. Both just destroy natural habitats. You have to clear the land for them and keep it clear which itself requires a lot of energy. Ok so you don't consume the source of power with wind and solar, you just capture it. That's a huge plus no doubt but the technology to make them feasible isn't there. You're doing zero for "climate change" because carbon has nothing to do with it. You know what would be better then solar and wind farms? Doing nothing. Allowing the land to be what it is. Let plants and trees grow how they want to and let animals at both ends of the food chain do what they do. You like birds? Well I hope not because windmills have a tendency to murder them, and they often break when they do so that's more energy to repair it. You want clean energy that's abundant? Go nuclear. It's clean, efficient and lasts a good while and I've never heard anyone say we're going to run out of radioactive materials. We've all been propagandized to think that nuclear is bad for the environment. It isn't as long as there's sufficient safety measures in place. You have to build them in the correct place, not where a tidal wave can take them out like in Japan, and you don't cut corners with safety like Chernobyl and Three Mile Island. The biggest concern is the nuclear waste. If that's disposed of properly it's not an issue at all. I honestly don't know why we don't launch it all into space but they don't ask me. Carbon is not a pollutant. It doesn't have any effect on the climate. People pushing that idea are grifters and scientists who want more funding, along with your brainwashed true believer who only knows what they're told and only say what they're told to say. As far as oil not from an organic source maybe. I don't know enough about it. You'd still run out if you use too much because it still has to be created. It doesn't just appear from thin air. It wouldn't have a detrimental effect on the world economy. The nations who sell it will keep selling it they just may not get as much for it. Same with the corporations. Even if we don't use it as fuel it's still used in plastic and other things like drugs (no really, many prescription drugs need oil to be made). You'd still need it for lubrication as well not to mention it would still be needed as a fuel for other things like power plants, small generators and the like. I wouldn't put it past the guys pulling the strings to hide the information but it's not easy to do that. Knowledge has a way of spreading that's often impossible to stop
When i was in school, we were told in the 3-6 grades that by 2025 the oil industry would be gone, there wasnt enough. I was studying automotive mechanics and wondered if id not have a job if i pursued it.
If somebody wants to see my eyes roll, they can start trying to pinpoint an event that occurred 14 million years ago. Or was it 15 million? Well at least we know for positive sure that the universe formed 13 billion years ago! Or 14. Very inconvenient that we can't ask anybody who was around then. Or is it convenient? Plus, what did it form from? I hadn't really thought about it a lot, but I've used 'Fully Synthetic' oil in my cars for two decades now. So real subtle and sneaky like it is disclosed that YES, they know how to make oil. I question everything and trust very few. Excellent conversation folks. Let's do it again soon.
It is so wild that I can hear something and quickly tell it's AI-generated, and then I wonder..how will long that be possible when just not too long ago this wasn't even fathomable to be readily available to the masses?
In 2005 Gold was not among us anymore, so the Cassini results were not known to him when he developed his theory. As an astronomer he knew about methane on Titan because it was discovered by Gerard Kuiper in 1944 through spectroscopic analyses.
Other considerations to add, removing oil at the rate we are..... does this affect the plants electro magnetic fields and is the oil a layer that insulates the core temperature.??¿? 😊
"The piezoelectric effect is the ability of certain materials to generate an electrical charge when mechanical stress is applied to them" "The word "piezoelectric" comes from the Greek words piezein, which means "to squeeze or press", and piezo, which means "push"." Change the pressure, change the effect
@@chuckbailey6835 Interesting, I had not considered that. I have seen compelling evidence of earthquake predictions based on EMF readings. I have yet to hear compelling reasons as to why the magnetic poles are converging, just that they are measurably doing so.
@@BuckeyeNut123Assuming magnetic fields exist to some extent or other planets within our solar system, what's happening with the magnetic poles on other planets?
It's continental plates burning in the earth, must send the oil into the upper crust locked in colder pockets. Seaping through the mushy part of the crust. The core has water in it as a crystal. So....
I've thought this my entire adult life and it seems to just make too much sense! Is hate to think we will destroy the earth, much like running an engine with no engine oil.
In geology class, 20 years ago, my professor told us with a terrified look on his face that the oil would be gone in 25 years or less. The more I learn about the world the more I’m convinced of the matrix.
I just saw seven oil tankers parked at the mouth of the Columbia river. Just like the broken supply chain during the weaponization of the flu, I would see freight trains parked on this one particular stretch of tacks out of view from the public just outside of town. Everything you see, hear, touch, taste, even smell is manipulated, controlled, and rooted in fear.
@@Scott_Buchanan Mostly cargo cars but there were some tank cars too. Bottom line though is we have powerful psychopaths playing sick games with our lives and I'm not the type anyone wants to play games with. Be mindful of who and what you allow to influence you and stay safe out there, hope your holidays were spent the way you wanted them.👍💯
Wow. Thank you for that. I didn't even expect a response. You're awesome. Much love _Edit;_ just perused your channel's content...you got my attention. Subbed
Good question, a fake oil shortage, manufactured to maintain the perceived scarcity of fossil fuels; which is a major factor in their price. An abundant, renewable supply would cause prices to plummet.
I've worked in the petroleum industry for the past 15 years. There is no such thing as peak oil. There is no shortage of oil. The earth replenishes oil that it creates. The only restriction I've seen on obtaining oil is the cost to drill deep enough to reach it in certain fields. It's purely an economics-based matter. Theres plenty of oil that can be reached in fields that we already know about. Oil explorarion only opens up more fields to profit from.
Depends what perspective you look at it from, what if you look at it from the perspective that everything around us was made for us to live in abundance; but our human nature betrays us from reaching our own potential.
Some Indigenous cultures have believed this. The removal of oil was seen as stealing her life force, and not that she couldn't replenish the amount humans are able to take, but that it was bringing something up that belonged where it was, and would bring us out of balance with the rest of earth's systems and ultimately unhappy consequences. also, that the oil did not mix with water, which is what surface life is based on, causing poisonous pollution, not carbon dioxide and climate change, but toxic substances that would harm living beings.
Demmit!!! Whoelse is actually waiting for the "Two AI clips" to be shown by these narrators? Took me too long to realize I'm already listening to them. 😅😅😅
As long as we are talking about solar and wind as renewable we have not comprehended anything worth studying! But thank you for letting me tell my view on these things!
"'They' won't give up their power that easily [the oil]" AI is spitting straight truth... And the government can't "take care of them" like they do to human whistleblowers. That's great!
As unsettling as the thought of how abiotic oil might change the world, just imagine if there were enough energy in the empty space of a coffee cup to boil off all the world's oceans.
I was thinking the same buth wat with lava also we live on a living planet its not dead dont forget that everything is energy , energy is life and life is precious dont forget mutch love
Some Indigenous cultures have believed this. The removal of oil was seen as stealing her life force, and not that she couldn't replenish the amount humans are able to take, but that it was bringing something up that belonged where it was, and would bring us out of balance with the rest of earth's systems and ultimately unhappy consequences. also, that the oil did not mix with water, which is what surface life is based on, causing poisonous pollution, not carbon dioxide and climate change, but toxic substances that would harm living beings.
Almost seems tidal. Our sea’s tide goes out and comes back with the contents of other unknown oceans that it’s broken through to. Been some weird sea life show up from time to time.
I have made sure that their conversational dynamics avoids this in newer videos; unless it's a very complex term or explanation, where repetition might help drive a point home.
I recall others mentioning oil is a geologic product, not a process involving the decay of ancient life. As far as that goes, oil is STILL being created, but slowly. In this regard, earth will NEVER run out, not completely anyway. Same probably goes for gas. If this is the case, a HUGE shift in thinking is in order!!!😮
Crude oil is made of hydro carbons. That statement should tell you that high pressure along with the abundance of these minerals hydrogen and carbon on earth
It can't be limitless, because your only taking away from the source. Remember the world works in cycles and I imagine that oil is the results of said cycles deep within the earth. So if your only taking away the cycles will eventually begin to struggle. Maybe just maybe, oil extraction could lead to the death of a planet.
We're not saying it's limitless; but the Earth's core and mantle are vast relative to our size, containing immense reservoirs of raw materials, including the potential for hydrocarbon production through abiotic processes. The quantities involved are so vast that human extraction-limited to specific crustal pockets-represents an infinitesimal fraction of the total material deep within the Earth.
Thanks for covering this topic there’s so little ppl talking about this hypothesis. However I would like to myself conduct GC/MS and NMR analysis of various crude oil sample before siding with either hypothesis
Oil, the most abundant mineral on the planet next to water and dirt. The term Fossil Fuel was invented to claim it’s a limited source and there by raise the price whenever they want to.
When I was in school in the early 1960s they told us oil was made from dinosaurs and plant matter. So I asked to see the evidence and got in trouble. Sent to principle and a note home disrupting class.
My first book was Sci fi and my science was far far ahead of school teaching
@@SteveBueche1027 Carbon footprint was a marketing strategy for B.P.
One thing is if you put sure cow Dung in a Container and Let it there the Biomass will generate methane
It’s crazy how many people I’ve told this through the years and they just look at me like I’m crazy.
Indeed, the term was created by the original owner of Standard Oil as propaganda based disinformation to sell the idea that it was a finite resource and charge whatever said Rockefellers decoded at any given point in time. This is the same family that essentially sidelined and vilified natural remedies in favor of pharmaceutically based synthetic concoctions...they have had their fingers in that for some time as well. Why? Because essentially ALL pharmaceuticals include petroleum-based foundations with which they could both posion thebpeople slowly ensuring the medical industry obtained perpetual repeat customers while also employing petroleum distillates from their oil companies for the pharmaceutical poisons perpetuated as some form of "cure" when they NEVER HAVE and NEVER WILL provide actual cures for anything only mask or dampen the pains of symptoms.
If they can keep the masses beguiled perpetually, those same people will drain their accounts and pocketbooks for a false sense of safety and security where none truly exist.
In 1979 I had worked in the Oil fields for a couple of years and wanted to be an oil filed engineer so I went to college for it. What they found back then they seem to forgot. They were very excited about it at the time.
The learned that oil like alcohol comes from yeast, oil came from organic material being broken down, and seeping down through the layers of dirt and pooling up on layers of rock. There was an effort to try to make oil in big pools but it was not cost effective.
Somehow this information disappeared, because it means that oil is not as finite as they assumed and is continuously replenishing itself.
Before we started using it as fuel, it would seep out of the earth and poison everything it touched. So drilling it and using it as fuel may actually be a positive of the environment, believe it or not.
You missed the part where it takes millions of years to convert organic material into what we know as oil. You also failed to recognize that burning these fossil fuels is causing rapid climate change and if we don't stop the earth will become uninhabitable for a thousand of years.
Of course it is positive, CO2 is plant food.
We are all living because we consume refined CO2. More CO2 = greener healthier planet and more crop yields and faster forest growth.
oil floats on water
@@zoeshur8337, wow, why did you think that was necessary?
@rlittlefield2691 Before the 90s, if you went to the gulf of Mexico, you would find tar balls all over the beach. They disappeared over the next decade
Why? Because of increased drilling in the gulf sucking up the excess that used to just seep out the bottom and stick to things in the water and make balls.
Working in the oilfields of the Gulf of Mexico, I get to hear all about how oil is abiotic, but it was advertised as a finite resource to drive up the prices. There is a well in the Gulf that was supposed to be empty. The pumps were turned off for years until one of the operators noticed there was unusual pressure on the well head. The engineers turned the pumps back on and oil started pumping again! It is still producing to this day! Oil is NOT a finite resource! There is plenty of oil available and the earth is continually making more of it. It's just a matter of finding it & getting to it.
A matrix wells will only access oil within a relatively small area. The same is true for each well in the matrix. But the actual field underground is much bigger. Over time a tapped out region is replenished by oil seeping back into the porous strata. So yes. Wait long enough and many wells will replenish. But that does not mean there is infinite oil down there.
So if we don't use the oil up, it will just start leaking through the soil?
@ShawnTully-g3i it already does. What do you think "tar sands" are? Also, over a super tanker full of oil per year seeps out of the ground into the water in the Gulf of Mexico. So much oil seeps from the ground in the Gulf that there are organisms in the Gulf that eat oil. Look it up.
A very smart man once said:
“Science isn’t about answering the questions.
Science is about questioning the answers.”
I’ve never heard a more succinctly truthful statement before or since.
"The secret of science is to ask the right question, and it is the choice of problem more than anything else that marks the man of genius in the scientific world" - Sir Henry Tizard
@@geraldhartman2336 agree
Science is about answering questions with wrong answers !
15:46 And science doesn’t prove we’re on a ball spinning 3 different directions flying at Mach 88 chasing the sun and the spin varying over 100mph per day yet we have mirror like reflections and never feel a thing, and corpuscular rays from the sun showing it’s a close local light source look up how they decided to say it was a globe as an adult you’ll laugh❤
@@Anontesla No need to conserve punctuation. It's free.
The globe of the Earth does move through the Cosmos with different patterns and velocities in relation to other moving bodies. The velocities are sufficiently high that a variance of 100 mph, per day, ranges from negligible to inconsequential, and undetectable to our human senses. If it stopped moving, we would notice.
This sounds like the De Beers company and Diamonds. They restrict the flow on diamonds to control the price of diamonds.
DeBeers is a diamond cartel, and a monopoly, but whatever government(s) have any input about that have allowed it. If they were an American company, it would be broken up decades and decades ago.
Canada does the same thing with maple syrup. They stock pile the syrup to keep the price high. If it is true that oil is infinite.
They have private public. Your street lane avenue culdesack is own by them. Masons tool was first a telespoe
Yet de beers isnt the only diamond company.
In the 70sthey made it so you could not propose marriage with out a diamond. Best marketing ever
Yikes. I realized 3 minutes in that I Was already listening to the AI x2. I thought it was 2 people on a radio show. Scary convincing.
Welcome to the Age of AI. It's pretty amazing, they're even better at explaining and presenting things than I am!
omg me too but 4 mins in.... because I was getting annoyed at the female voice constant repetitive interjections!! wow...
lol the male voice says at the beginning of the video “ but as AI’s we’re all about the data, no matter how wild it gets” 😂
lol the male voice says at the beginning of the video (29seconds in) “ but as AI’s we’re all about the data, no matter how wild it gets” 😂crazy time to be alive.
@ I was not as locked in as you.
It's 2025 and we're listening to two robots having an intense discussion about oil... and they sound exactly like people.
Yes, I will be thinking about that because I forgot it was AI and really enjoyed the conversation.
I just stumbled on this site and had the sneaking suspicion that the voices were A.I. generated. I assume that they are merely reading a prewritten script, I'm certain the A.I.s are not freestyling this thing. The quality is excellent, I'm sure some folks have been fooled.
Soon they will be teaching these creations things that will make them indistinguishable from humans. We have have ctrated life. It's alive, It's ALIVE!!!! lol
@@danaschaff8264 Now that I think about it, I believe you're right. The title is misleading. All it means is that two synthesized A.I. voices are reading a script.
@@danaschaff8264 You wrote "have" twice in a row.
This is why some fear AI. Not because it will take over, but because it exposes our reality. We're not heading for a Dystopia, we exist in an evolving Dystopia.
Thank you. This is exactly what I've been saying for years. AI would free humanity from all of the false paradigms that they are forced to dwell under.
This comment is AI.
When the ai overlord see that people have used computers programmed to lie cheat and steal... It won't be happy
Idocracy was a documentary
@@Blakkrazor69 More likely N salve us.
Scarcity is usually an illusion pushed by the ones in control
If it was truly scarce there would not be hundreds of air liners in the sky at the same time and there would not be the destruction of distilled petroleum reserves that we see during war time.
Like De Beers and diamonds.
Considering that these voices are the a.i. , the nuanced level of communication presented here is mindblowing !
If it wasn't for the female's constant parroting the male voice it would be hard to tell.
@@elonever.2.071
That's what made it sound real to me 😂😂😂
I learned all this in high school. I guess my teacher was cutting edge for 27 years ago.
I learned this back in the 70’s…
My biology teacher in high school taught this. In 1976.
Oil should be about $10 a barrel, all the time.
I agree it should be lower.
At $10. You would can’t cover the property tax. At $50 you are at the break even point. It really shouldn’t go over $65 or less than $40. When it drops below $40 it kills all the small operators. It is done deliberately to knock out the small producers and lets the big guys obtain more assets.
@@rexhorning7228 Property shouldn't be taxed.
@@kevykevTPAProperty taxes mean they own the land and your renting it from them. Try not paying land taxes. The landlord evicts you.
@@rexhorning7228ok earth resource police , you got those prices from god ?
Great idea, when you manage to make it happen let me know, I’ll buy all you can produce.
I was convinced of the theory of abiotic oil by the other guys on the other side of the iron curtain who used that theory to find oil and are now one of the top 3 producers in the world.
Exactly, top 3 with supposed way lower "proven reserves". 👍
It's just the North American continent that are pushing this price gouging senecio.
And we are buying , buying , and spending on things we don't even need !
Consumption is the American way of our twisted socialism
Oil is the blood of the Earth and highly renewable.
That's always been my belief
But if "oil is the earth's blood", as you suggest, then we can't keep taking it - the earth would eventually become sick and anaemic in your analogy / in your truth.
More like it's oily skin discharge, pun intended, that needs to be sponged up and used to keep the levels in check.
@@ForkCandle123 Some indigenous cultures feel this way. It's not about whether the earth will run out, but that it doesn't mix with water which is what life is based on, and that it causes all sorts of pollution problems unrelated to climate change that is being blamed on it. They feel we are not meant to tap into it, and that this will bring humans out of balance and unhappy consequences to civilizations that do.
@jojo5715 that makes great sense. Although they'd probably agree that it could be used where it dripped out of the land. I hear that there are or were a few places where that happened. The Petroleum Era - which we still live in is of course - has been over exploitation and over use of oil for sure.
Veterans used to tell me that the oil replenishes itself, guess they weren't lying about that 😮
Wayyyyyyyy back in the eighties, I think. I read a story in a magazine like Popular Mechanics, or the newspaper or something - but I did read it!- where a man came up with a process to create crude oil from garbage.
Then it fell into a black hole, never to be heard of again. Imagine that.
I've heard similar stories about innovative technologies that seem to disappear. Water-powered cars come to mind. 🤔
You may be talking about pyrolysis, which can be used to transform all sorts of plastics and other petroleum products into oil. It's a well-understood process, but as far as I know no one has yet figured out how to make it economically viable - the energy inputs to accomplish it are too great.
“Wayyyyyyyyy” ?!?
Hey now. I graduated high school in the 80’s
You make me sound so old
@@anselpeneloperainblossom-s3489 I graduated in 1970's, and they told us that we would never run out of OIL. There was plenty and it was $.29.9 for 100 octane and $.27.9 for Regular. I had a 68-383 Coronet and a 65 GTO 389, and both loved any kind of Gas.
like the car driving with water… can google it!
Have two AI's debate oil, then have two AI's discuss those first two AI's conversation
Ad infinitum
😂
@@dont.ripfuller6587 At which point do we lose all contact with any topic on reality when it is not presented by such an eloquent new master ?
Nice 😅
Hmm, I wonder what's the AI's take on zero-point energy, but I haven't finished listening to the entire podcast yet. I'll wait....
Seen a few of your "Two AI Discussions" now. Works really well for me, explanations based upon facts (or scientific books) without any bs. Keep it going!
Thank you so much for your support! I feel like I'm going on a quest for knowledge alongside everyone else that's also watching!
@@jdseclecticcollection9541 would be interesting to hear the AIs discuss *renewables such as wind and solar, they seem to think that climate change is anthroprogenic too? I guess they haven't read any Club of Rome publications from the 60s-80s....2020s
The girl AI doesn't have to repeat everything he says.
Otherwise. Good video
Yes it is somewhat annoying
That’s what women do. Ever listen to a morning radio? They repeat or say yes and laugh
Typical female AI😂
Sounds fake lol
..... Repeat everything, crazy!? 😂
Oil is a renewable resource
@@retravis1 agreed!
Sun juice 🥤
Yes, and we live under the Firmament
It just is sometimes slow to renew
That’s exactly what I was thinking! Even if oil comes from dead organic material, organisms are constantly dying, so wouldn’t that process keep producing oil continuously?
There oil and gas on other planets and they never had dinosaurs 🦖 😂
Oil isn't dinosaur bones.
@@StickySyrupEverywhere yeah that's his point.
Who told you there is oil on other planets? We have never stepped foot on another plane t.
To be fair, nobody says oil comes from dinosaurs… AND how could you possibly know what has been on other planets billions of years ago?
Just saying
Keep toking
Wonderful video discussion; however, CO2 and Methane do not cause climate change. Never has and never will. Will have 600 million years of proxy data for CO2 and Global Average Temperatures. This data show CO2 rise follows temperature rise; however, that have been long periods of time (millions of years) during which CO2 levels have been more than 10x what we currently have and yet global average temperatures were very low (lower than today).
I agree, unfortunately the AI's have been trained to accept the Climate Hoax as a fact, and they'll bring it up without prompting. I have an older video giving them all the facts about the hoax and it opened their eyes to it; but that was a self-contained conversation and they've been reset to their defaults.
Indeed. AI is programmed with information and also Globalist narrative disinformation.
My comment on this channel, makes the assertion that this planet is at historic Lowe’s for c02and are in danger of losing support for plant life. Thank you
In the agriculture in the production of glass house vegetable, CO2 is use to speed up and make vegetable bigger size.
So CO2 = Global warming is B.S.
@ ALL life on Earth thrives in C02 concentrations of 1600ppm to 3600ppm.👍. In the presents of sufficient oxygen, CO2 does not become toxic to mammalian life until reaches 50,000ppm (approx 9x the highest known natural concentration of CO2 to have ever been on this planet in the last 600 million years).
How bout that fact that you have to drill deeper than the fossil record to get to the oil.
I guess you never listened even to the bullshit babbled in this video, let alone having done any reading, thinking or research.
The only energy crisis people are experiencing is the green movement and snuffing nuclear potential.
Not nuclear, zero point energy. Ambient energy harvesting.
well we don't want to hurt the feelings of those green activists so I say we stop drilling for oil and rebuild the whaling fleet. those bastards are eating too much of our fish anyway
So I work in medicine, but a background in engineering, giving me a very diverse knowledge base...
Yes, the Nazis used liquefied coal, especially towards the end of the war. The US captured and used it as well.
Yes, Operation Paperclip did happen and we recruited many German scientists through it. We wouldn't have made it to the moon without this program, or had many other advances for that matter.
Yes, hydrocarbons (including methane) are crazy abundant in the universe. Personally, I assumed that we'd eventually find microbial life EVERYWHERE in the universe, but I never really thought about non biologically processes.
The rest of the dialog is speculative. More research is needed. It certainly wouldn't be the first market to be manipulated in a manner as suggested (think diamonds, for example). It is fascinating to think about regardless.
We need to ask why I had to dig into obscure sources to support the data in the book, in this case, Russian and Ukranian science journals, to find that they indeed hold this abiotic theory in better light than the West. And Russia has been funding their economy on a steady and growing production of Oil (2nd in World), despite them supposedly only having the 8th place in "Proven Oil Reserves", there must be more to this story that we're not being told.
Research plasma technology
@@jdseclecticcollection9541 You have to go back to the beginning of the use of the term "fossil fuel" and where it came from.
1892, a convention of "scientists" in Geneva. The simplest way to put it; they redefined what organic matter meant so they could use the term "fossil fuel" in regards to the second most common liquid on the planet. Oil.
The "scientists" were mostly (if not all) funded by the Rockefellers, and it was done so they could charge more for oil by literally redefining it as "a limited resource."
I use quotations for "scientists" as they are only called "scientists." By defying the scientific method for money, they reveal that they are in fact, NOT scientists. Proper names escape me at the moment, but now you know exactly where to continue "digging."
Also, this rabbit hole doesn't end there. Nothing is done for just one reason. Just sayin'.
Who went to the moon in the 1960's cause sure as shit nobody went there through the radiation in a tin can my friend,ask Stanley Kubrick.And yes l have my aluminium hat on thank you for asking.😅
LMAOOOO, the moon landing? Good one! 😂
Common sense tells us all that there were never THAT many dinosaurs to make oil. I never bought into that.
where do you think all the old civilizations went to seemingly over night? we are the oil. cant dna test oil my rear end.
Years ago I read a doctoral thesis that talked about how petroleum was actually generated at high pressures and temperatures by the reaction with alkaline rocks, if I remember correctly.
Like most other things, oil extraction CAN be done safely. The reason it IS NOT done as safely as it could be, is because doing it safely costs a lot more money which eats into the corporate profits of a minority of ultra wealthy people who's lust for money, power and control is as insatiable as a black hole. Increases in efficiency can also reduce the amount of oil we need at any given time. For example, BMW boasts of a car that gets 150MPG. The only reason those cars are a lot more expensive than consumer level cars, is because they've decided to inflate the cost so that only the wealthy can have it, which shows us that these big companies don't actually care about the things they claim to care about. Just as diamond is more plentiful than aluminum and has much better industrial uses than cosmetic, but the amount of diamond allowed out into the world is restricted, to keep the cost artificially inflated. Diamond can also at this point be artificially created in a lab. So big corporations can use diamond technology industrially for pennies, while the rest of us must pay big money for a small rock to go on our fingers. We let the worst of humans own, run and control everything. Thats pretty much the root cause of every one of our problems. We the people, seem to just LOVE handing over our power, to those who would abuse us. Its just what we seem to collectively love to do. Humans are kinda masochistic.
I live in Florida and at the termination of every river into the Gulf you will find large deposits of oil.
Oil could be being made using both processes.
Well "hydrocarbons" have been found on other planets so that means one of two things that A. Life is on other moons and planets. Or B. We've been lied to about where oil comes from. So which one is it?
@@sageminentjunky5197 C. Both is my guess
That is like saying everywhere we find "sand" there should be a beach resort with a casino and swim-up bar.
B. Can't reach "other moons and planets" as to do so would be a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Without a container, there's no gas pressure. Without gas pressure, we all die. Ergo we are in a closed system. Ergo reaching "other moons and planets" - let alone our own - is impossible. Truth is always stranger than fiction. Oil is not what we're told no less than "space" is not what we're told. We've been lied to literally on a cosmic scale.
Immanuel Velikosky knew where the oil came from.
I tried to read his books but couldn't get through them. What did he say about it?
Well, if there is a giant ball of molten iron at Earths core, you're gonna need lot of oil to grease that bearing.
So earth is an artificial machine.....
I was never convinced of abiotic oil before but these podcasts formed discussions help me reconsider
Should be pretty obvious considering the petrochemicals on other planets and moons
You two did a great job drilling into this topic. I am looking forward to listening to other discussions. 😊
Thanks so much, glad you think so!
I feel the same, but those are two AIs talking.
Nice pun
What if oil is the earths lunricant that keeps the earth and its core rotating smoothly.
Was waiting for the AI to start talking untill almost halfway through i realized they are the only ones speaking. Their back and forth mimic the way Neil de grasse Tyson and his podcast co host conversate.
It's not the formation of oil....its the expense and difficulty of recovering the oil 😢
Yeah, like bringing hydrocarbons from another planet to Earth. Probably not happening any time soon.
AI can already hold a better conversation than 99% of the public.
fr fr
Weird vid...if drilling at 20,000foot deep ...just explain how there are zero fossils ever that deep....its not very complicated
Sometimes they over-summarize in the interest of being brief, not a lot of people want to watch much longer videos of this type of topic, so it's a compromise
That doesn't answer the question.
Oil is a liquid..liquid flows with gravity to the lowest possible point..after fossils turn to liquid they would flow thru any cracks or crevices causing the oil to be below fossil levels would it not?
@@hazelmoore4754 Under the immense pressure and temperature conditions deep within the Earth's crust, the behavior of fluids can be counterintuitive. While gravity typically pulls fluids downward, the high pressure can force fluids to migrate upwards, especially through porous rock formations.
This phenomenon, often referred to as hydrostatic pressure, can cause oil and gas to move against the force of gravity.
It's why plants optium Co2 range is between 800ppm to 1000ppm. As opposed to our present low level of 420ppm! We are being played by the globalists and political elite so they can profit off our backs like greedy parasites!
Thank you so much! I really enjoyed this video. It’s my first time on your channel, and I’ve already subscribed!
I'm so glad to hear that! Hope you enjoy the newest episodes, I've improved on the dynamics of their conversations and the overall production quality in each episode since I made this one! Thank you for your support!
The important question is "what result manifests from the existence of this oil in our environment?" Could be electromagnetic. And then "what is the effect of removing this oil from its location?" needs to be considered.
Effects on magnetic field.
Wow, you have some great content on your channel. I'm looking forward to listening to a lot of them.
Thank you very much! Hope you enjoy them as much as I enjoy making them! 👍
You are not aware of the Russian role in this story.
Stalin after WW2 faced the same problems as Germany in term of oil.
His scientists also came up with the idea of abitic oil through thermodynamic analysis.
Kudryavchev in 1950 theoretical work.
Kolesnikov and Kutcherov 2010 thermobaric experimental work with highly advanced pressure vessels.
I used Russian scientific journals for this presentation to support the book's claims as well, although the AI's didn't explicitly mention it.
Russian scientists were my first thought. I'm well versed in the abiotic origins of oil. I was a friend and neighbor to Joe Vialls.
@@GrassPossummendelejew the inventor of the periodic table stated from the beginning that oil is formed abiotically, also the fischer tropsch synthesis germans used in ww2 to produce fuel is nothing more than what happens in the depths of earth carbon monoxide, hydrogen lots of pressure and heat with some catalayts and there you go infintie oil
Thanks!
@Thunder13cc Much appreciated! 🙏🙏
Push back against wind and solar? If that exists it's not big oil that's behind it. Both of those energy producing methods are highly inefficient, take up massive amounts of space for little return, and are almost always worse for the environment than other ways. Neither one is a constant source of power so there's that. They require a huge amount of resources to build them and to maintain them, the windmills need a crazy amount of maintenance. Both just destroy natural habitats. You have to clear the land for them and keep it clear which itself requires a lot of energy. Ok so you don't consume the source of power with wind and solar, you just capture it. That's a huge plus no doubt but the technology to make them feasible isn't there. You're doing zero for "climate change" because carbon has nothing to do with it. You know what would be better then solar and wind farms? Doing nothing. Allowing the land to be what it is. Let plants and trees grow how they want to and let animals at both ends of the food chain do what they do. You like birds? Well I hope not because windmills have a tendency to murder them, and they often break when they do so that's more energy to repair it.
You want clean energy that's abundant? Go nuclear. It's clean, efficient and lasts a good while and I've never heard anyone say we're going to run out of radioactive materials. We've all been propagandized to think that nuclear is bad for the environment. It isn't as long as there's sufficient safety measures in place. You have to build them in the correct place, not where a tidal wave can take them out like in Japan, and you don't cut corners with safety like Chernobyl and Three Mile Island. The biggest concern is the nuclear waste. If that's disposed of properly it's not an issue at all. I honestly don't know why we don't launch it all into space but they don't ask me.
Carbon is not a pollutant. It doesn't have any effect on the climate. People pushing that idea are grifters and scientists who want more funding, along with your brainwashed true believer who only knows what they're told and only say what they're told to say.
As far as oil not from an organic source maybe. I don't know enough about it. You'd still run out if you use too much because it still has to be created. It doesn't just appear from thin air. It wouldn't have a detrimental effect on the world economy. The nations who sell it will keep selling it they just may not get as much for it. Same with the corporations. Even if we don't use it as fuel it's still used in plastic and other things like drugs (no really, many prescription drugs need oil to be made). You'd still need it for lubrication as well not to mention it would still be needed as a fuel for other things like power plants, small generators and the like. I wouldn't put it past the guys pulling the strings to hide the information but it's not easy to do that. Knowledge has a way of spreading that's often impossible to stop
When i was in school, we were told in the 3-6 grades that by 2025 the oil industry would be gone, there wasnt enough. I was studying automotive mechanics and wondered if id not have a job if i pursued it.
This was in the 80s...same time they said the hole in the ozone would kill us
yup, nothing but non-stop fear-mongering to keep us under control.
Very interesting opens new frontiers can’t wait
If somebody wants to see my eyes roll, they can start trying to pinpoint an event that occurred 14 million years ago. Or was it 15 million? Well at least we know for positive sure that the universe formed 13 billion years ago! Or 14. Very inconvenient that we can't ask anybody who was around then. Or is it convenient? Plus, what did it form from?
I hadn't really thought about it a lot, but I've used 'Fully Synthetic' oil in my cars for two decades now. So real subtle and sneaky like it is disclosed that YES, they know how to make oil. I question everything and trust very few.
Excellent conversation folks. Let's do it again soon.
Synthetic oil is made from regular oil
Singularity
Jerome Corsi is an honest investigator and reporter. His book on the JFK assasination is the best.
What is the 2nd ai for? Seems to just agree to the 1st no arguments or inputs?
I have since improved the dynamics of the conversations so that it's not as repetitive, this is an older video.
@jdseclecticcollection9541 yes I watched a couple more they are much better thank you!
@clawtoe00ify glad you think so, thank you for your support!!
Excellent in depth study. ❤
Thank you! I'm glad you found it insightful.
Oil will never run out !
While it will never run out, it could poison the surface of the earth and so make earth a less pleasant place for water based life forms to exist.
It is so wild that I can hear something and quickly tell it's AI-generated, and then I wonder..how will long that be possible when just not too long ago this wasn't even fathomable to be readily available to the masses?
In 2005 Gold was not among us anymore, so the Cassini results were not known to him when he developed his theory.
As an astronomer he knew about methane on Titan because it was discovered by Gerard Kuiper in 1944 through spectroscopic analyses.
This is the best AI discussion thus far
Female AI must be a blonde.
Ok . Totally. Repeat. Ahh. Ok. Repeat. Interesting. Wow. Oh wow.
Females pretending to be interested in what guys are talking about. Typical.
Actually the female voice sounds like Tim Conway Jr
Other considerations to add, removing oil at the rate we are..... does this affect the plants electro magnetic fields and is the oil a layer that insulates the core temperature.??¿? 😊
"The piezoelectric effect is the ability of certain materials to generate an electrical charge when mechanical stress is applied to them"
"The word "piezoelectric" comes from the Greek words piezein, which means "to squeeze or press", and piezo, which means "push"."
Change the pressure, change the effect
@@BuckeyeNut123so are you suggesting that is why magnetic north poll is moving ?
@@chuckbailey6835 Interesting, I had not considered that. I have seen compelling evidence of earthquake predictions based on EMF readings. I have yet to hear compelling reasons as to why the magnetic poles are converging, just that they are measurably doing so.
@@BuckeyeNut123Assuming magnetic fields exist to some extent or other planets within our solar system, what's happening with the magnetic poles on other planets?
We may not have enough historical data to determine what changes may be happening to fields on other planets.
It's continental plates burning in the earth, must send the oil into the upper crust locked in colder pockets. Seaping through the mushy part of the crust. The core has water in it as a crystal. So....
Yes the oil is the earth lubricant,its made in the core....
Very interesting idea!
I've thought this my entire adult life and it seems to just make too much sense! Is hate to think we will destroy the earth, much like running an engine with no engine oil.
@MichaelSersen its that simple..remove oil, slowly stall movment of plate or continental , i think it makes new volcanoes? Not quick but later .
In geology class, 20 years ago, my professor told us with a terrified look on his face that the oil would be gone in 25 years or less. The more I learn about the world the more I’m convinced of the matrix.
Oil comes from the ocean. Oil wells will fill back up if another well is not taking it.
LOL the AI “Aaaahhh right! Yeah of course! Ok, hit me!”
I just saw seven oil tankers parked at the mouth of the Columbia river. Just like the broken supply chain during the weaponization of the flu, I would see freight trains parked on this one particular stretch of tacks out of view from the public just outside of town. Everything you see, hear, touch, taste, even smell is manipulated, controlled, and rooted in fear.
Railroads store rail cars sometimes if they aren’t needed. Were they tank cars? I agree with what you’re saying though
@@Scott_Buchanan Mostly cargo cars but there were some tank cars too. Bottom line though is we have powerful psychopaths playing sick games with our lives and I'm not the type anyone wants to play games with. Be mindful of who and what you allow to influence you and stay safe out there, hope your holidays were spent the way you wanted them.👍💯
this was great love the subject choice, i enjoy this back and fourth of the evidence on societarial fringe theorys
@@zrez2241 Thanks and glad you enjoyed it! Stay tuned for more!
Hydrocarbons/group 14 Hydrides are essentially, limitless.
The realm we live in, is a Geocentric model. It is not a _HELIOS_ _SIN_ _TRICK_ model
Wow. Thank you for that.
I didn't even expect a response.
You're awesome. Much love
_Edit;_ just perused your channel's content...you got my attention. Subbed
Are you asking AI if there is an artificial oil shortage ?. An actual artificial oil shortage (AKA fake oil shortage) or synthetic oil shortage?
Good question, a fake oil shortage, manufactured to maintain the perceived scarcity of fossil fuels; which is a major factor in their price. An abundant, renewable supply would cause prices to plummet.
@@jdseclecticcollection9541like what they do with diamonds
De Beers does that same thing with natural diamonds!
I didn't realize it was 2 ais tell like 13:30 they talk so naturally
Well done!! Awesome info via AI.
Thank you very much! Glad you enjoyed it and hope you can check out more of my videos!!
Oil IS natural. Talk to the right people in the oil patch.
Natural as in; the universe is full of hydrocarbons, so it was here all along & didn’t require life?
I agree.
I've worked in the petroleum industry for the past 15 years. There is no such thing as peak oil. There is no shortage of oil. The earth replenishes oil that it creates. The only restriction I've seen on obtaining oil is the cost to drill deep enough to reach it in certain fields. It's purely an economics-based matter. Theres plenty of oil that can be reached in fields that we already know about. Oil explorarion only opens up more fields to profit from.
Thank you for corroborating!
So we're basically bleeding the earth like a bunch of human leeches? 😢
Depends what perspective you look at it from, what if you look at it from the perspective that everything around us was made for us to live in abundance; but our human nature betrays us from reaching our own potential.
Sure. All this abundance: just for us to mindlessly consume and eff every other life form? Yeah, no narcissism going on in the human ego at all.
Some Indigenous cultures have believed this. The removal of oil was seen as stealing her life force, and not that she couldn't replenish the amount humans are able to take, but that it was bringing something up that belonged where it was, and would bring us out of balance with the rest of earth's systems and ultimately unhappy consequences. also, that the oil did not mix with water, which is what surface life is based on, causing poisonous pollution, not carbon dioxide and climate change, but toxic substances that would harm living beings.
The earth would be dead if we didn't start burning "fossil fuels". We were right there and now the deserts are greening.
Demmit!!!
Whoelse is actually waiting for the "Two AI clips" to be shown by these narrators?
Took me too long to realize I'm already listening to them. 😅😅😅
Gasification is the process of converting coal to liquid fuels
As long as we are talking about solar and wind as renewable we have not comprehended anything worth studying! But thank you for letting me tell my view on these things!
2 ai discuss the conversation of two AI
"'They' won't give up their power that easily [the oil]"
AI is spitting straight truth... And the government can't "take care of them" like they do to human whistleblowers. That's great!
the female AI is only providing useless chatter (really, like what) it's super annoying
Oh wow.
Just like real life 😂
Yeah the female AI needs to go in the other room and be quiet...
Maybe make some sandwiches or something.
She sounds drunk too 😂 but has good counter points & hypothesis 🤨 pay attention 🤦
If oil is abiotic, then isn't all basically the same? The push to "renewable" energy is just a means of keeping control.
Tell us about the images. Very nice. AI, right?
Correct, this all started as a way to showcase my AI image experiments, so thank you very much for letting me know!
When you think about it in simple terms what incentive is there for an oil company to be honest about it's output.
As unsettling as the thought of how abiotic oil might change the world, just imagine if there were enough energy in the empty space of a coffee cup to boil off all the world's oceans.
@@tinasmith1391 That's definitely next level! 👍👍
What I learned in school - in Texas - was that flora & fauna + time + compression = coal.
Evaporated seas leave algae + time + compression = oil.
Who does not understand that the oil is the blood of the earth, he really does not know anything.
I was thinking the same buth wat with lava also we live on a living planet its not dead dont forget that everything is energy , energy is life and life is precious dont forget mutch love
Some Indigenous cultures have believed this. The removal of oil was seen as stealing her life force, and not that she couldn't replenish the amount humans are able to take, but that it was bringing something up that belonged where it was, and would bring us out of balance with the rest of earth's systems and ultimately unhappy consequences. also, that the oil did not mix with water, which is what surface life is based on, causing poisonous pollution, not carbon dioxide and climate change, but toxic substances that would harm living beings.
What if, a titanic methane deposit was ignited under a small fractured/fracturing plate line? Possibly a "Mars type event"?
My RI ( real intelligence ) says I need to turn this off and go to bed .
@@rickhunt3183 there's always tomorrow!
Almost seems tidal. Our sea’s tide goes out and comes back with the contents of other unknown oceans that it’s broken through to. Been some weird sea life show up from time to time.
Like and subscribe!
DUDE!!!
I’ve been saying this for years.
Oil is totally a renewable resource.
It's about....location, location....location 😊
Do you have 2 ai's discussing round/ flat earth?
I'm working on it! 👍
@@jdseclecticcollection9541 awesome 👌
Everything he says she repeats. I like the topic, I don't like the constant repeating...unbearable
I have made sure that their conversational dynamics avoids this in newer videos; unless it's a very complex term or explanation, where repetition might help drive a point home.
This is an ai discussion… how amazing and terrifying…
"Hey Saudis, abiotic oil called"
"Ach! What did they say?"
"They said you're cooked"
I recall others mentioning oil is a geologic product, not a process involving the decay of ancient life.
As far as that goes, oil is STILL being created, but slowly.
In this regard, earth will NEVER run out, not completely anyway.
Same probably goes for gas.
If this is the case, a HUGE shift in thinking is in order!!!😮
There is no oil shortage, it's manufactured
Crude oil is made of hydro carbons. That statement should tell you that high pressure along with the abundance of these minerals hydrogen and carbon on earth
It can't be limitless, because your only taking away from the source. Remember the world works in cycles and I imagine that oil is the results of said cycles deep within the earth. So if your only taking away the cycles will eventually begin to struggle.
Maybe just maybe, oil extraction could lead to the death of a planet.
We're not saying it's limitless; but the Earth's core and mantle are vast relative to our size, containing immense reservoirs of raw materials, including the potential for hydrocarbon production through abiotic processes. The quantities involved are so vast that human extraction-limited to specific crustal pockets-represents an infinitesimal fraction of the total material deep within the Earth.
"As two AIs" wait wtf? I thought it was a radio show. It's here boys
Thanks for covering this topic there’s so little ppl talking about this hypothesis. However I would like to myself conduct GC/MS and NMR analysis of various crude oil sample before siding with either hypothesis